The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
STATEMENT OF WORK
LONG-TERM MONITORING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Contract Number: N44255-19-R-6006, PWS ATTACHMENT K, NBK-Bremerton LTM Date: TBD
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND NORTHWEST
1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE SUITE 203
SILVERDALE WA 98315 1101
NBK-Bremerton Terrestrial LTM and O&M
INTRODUCTION
NAVFAC NW is acquiring environmental services for the purpose of fulfilling the Long Term Monitoring (LTM) requirements, remedy inspections and remedy improvements at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility, Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton, and Fleet & Industrial Supply Center Puget Sound (FISC) at Bremerton Washington. The area occupied by these Navy commands is hereafter collectively referred to as Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton (NBK-Brem). The goal of the LTM phase of the Navy’s IR Program for NBK-Brem is to ensure that all program remedies stay protective through monitoring, institutional controls inspections, and maintenance.
BACKGROUND
Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton has six operable units (OU): OU A, OU B Marine, OU B Terrestrial, OU C, OU D (Harborside Fountain Park), and OU Naval Supply Center (OU NSC). NBK-Brem also has a Petroleum Management Plan (PMP) (Reference 1) with coverage across portions of the entire complex. Operable Unit D (OU D) was formerly part of NBK-Brem, but has been transferred to the City of Bremerton Washington by quit claim deed, which includes Land Use Controls (LUC) applicable to any party using and/or modifying this property in any manner. Formal agreements are in place so that the City of Bremerton completes the annual Land Use Control Inspections at OU D. The shoreline of OU D was incorporated into OU B Terrestrial (OU B T) for monitoring purposes. Monitoring Well (MW) LTMP-5 (724) is the designate point of compliance for OU D groundwater monitoring. All six OUs are post-Record of Decision (ROD) since May 2005 and all have Remedies in Place (RIP).
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this task order is to continue with the required monitoring of NBK-Brem Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) and institutional and land use control inspection requirements as outlined in the RODs and the updated Petroleum Management Plan (Reference 1). The work for this task order shall incorporate information from the updated Operation and Maintenance Plan (O&M) and Institutional Control (IC) Plan (Reference 2). This task order shall also update previously completed documents such as Uniform Federal Policy Sampling and Analysis Plan (UFP SAP) (Reference 3), Accident Prevention Plans/Site Safety and Health Plans (Reference 4), the LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan (Reference 5), Data Summary and Trend Analysis Report (Reference 6), and Remedy Inspection Report (Reference 7). The Contractor shall also assist the Navy in completing remedy improvements and maintenance, providing well installation/repair as needed, and producing reports and data submittals as indicated within. An update of the LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan shall include updates from the previous Trend Analysis report, recommendations from the Five Year Review (Reference 8), guidance from the Remedial Project Manager (RPM), lessons learned, consideration of data, inclusion of other supported monitoring needs, optimization reports, consideration of past descriptive reports, and strategy for insuring requirements, objectives, and needs are achieved amid the typical work environment on this site.
APPLICABLE DIRECTIVES AND DOCUMENTS
| 1 |
| Final 2017 Petroleum Management Plan |
| April 2017 |
| 2 |
| Operation and Maintenance and Institutional Control Plan; Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex Superfund Site, Bremerton Washington |
| July 2018 |
| 3 |
| Final Tier II UFP Sampling and Analysis Plan |
| July 2018 |
| 4 |
| Accident Prevention Plan, including Site Safety and Health Plan Monitoring, Inspections and Improvements at OU A, OU NSC, OU B T, PMP, and OU C |
| July 2018 |
| 5 |
| LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan for OU A, OU NSC, OU B T, PMP, OU C, and OU D |
| August 2018 |
| 6 |
| 2017 Data Summary and Trend Analysis Report |
May 2018
| 7 |
| 2017 Annual Remedy Inspection Report |
July 2018
| 8 |
| Fourth Five-Year Review, Bremerton Naval Complex, Bremerton, Washington |
| September 2017 |
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
The contractor shall provide the technical effort in the work categories per the tasks and their associated schedules as described below. The contractor shall be responsible for subcontractor bid adequacy. It is expected that the contractor will provide adequate insight to any subcontractor in preparing for work on NBK-Brem.
Task 1 Project Management Provide project management for the duration of this project. The project is estimated to last for 15 months. The work included in this task is intended to cover all administrative and management efforts for the entire SLIN. This task will include one meeting (PreCON/MUM).
The contractor’s proposed work schedule shall be part of the proposal. The work schedule shall be regularly updated and provided to the RPM in native format (MS Project). Invoices shall include task percents complete in a format similar to the work schedule.
1 x PreCON/MUM Meeting
The contractor shall deliver draft and final plans and reports directly to the regulators and stakeholders after the Navy conducts a final review of the “redline” version of the plan or report and agrees the documents are ready for delivery. This excludes internal draft plans and reports and excludes the Accident Prevention Plan and Site Safety and Health Plan (APP/SSHP) and the Non-LTM plans and reports which are for delivery to the Navy only.
Task 2 Project Plans, Project Reports, and Meetings The contractor shall update all NBK-Brem OU project plans as indicated in Subtasks 2.1 – 2.3. Project reports have been indicated in Subtasks 2.4 and 2.5. Note the Deliverable Schedule describes the number of iterations for each plan. Meetings used to support development of the project plans are covered in Subtask 2.6. Informal meeting support shall be provided as described in Subtask 2.7. All documents shall refer to all monitoring wells by both number and alternate nomenclature.
Subtask 2.1 Tier II Uniform Federal Policy Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) One SAP shall be developed and followed for the entire duration of the NBK-Brem Long-Term Monitoring work. Development of the SAP shall be per the UFP-QAPP guidance. The annual SAP shall support environmental sampling and analysis for Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) and Environmental Restoration (ER) work at NBK-Brem. The final format shall be in a three-ring binder to allow breakout for specific field events, updates, and corrections. Graphic representation of conceptual site models for each OU and specific zones of interest shall be included. The SAP shall be developed in internal draft, draft, and final versions. The final will act as the document to which project work is accomplished.
Development of SAP Plans shall include two meetings to ensure regulator and NAVFAC NW RPM acceptance as shown in Subtask 2.6. SAP development shall include regulators, stakeholders, and NAVFAC NW RPM and others as approved by the RPM.
1 x Technical Report Complex (SAP Internal Draft, Draft, and Final)
Subtask 2.2 Long-Term Monitoring, Inspection and Improvement Plan An annual LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan shall be prepared for NBK-Brem. Development of the LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan shall include one meeting to ensure stakeholder and regulator inclusion and acceptance as shown in Subtask 2.9. In addition to traditional contents, this plan shall include recovery plans for field work interference, facility requirement difficulties, sampling anomalies, analytical outliers and invalidated data occurrences. Sampling locations and events shall be clearly identified and certified as accurate by the contractor. Monitoring well descriptions and identification shall be de-conflicted due to ambiguous information. A descriptive explanation of monitoring requirements, purposes, and information use shall be included. Development of the LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan is expected to require one meeting to support objective clarification.
1 x Technical Report Medium
Subtask 2.3 Accident Prevention Plan (APP) & Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP) One APP/SSHP shall be developed and followed for the entire duration of the NBK-Brem Long-Term Monitoring work. Development of the APP/SSHP shall be considered acceptable by the NAVFAC NW Safety Officer, or their assigned representative, prior to beginning any field work. Development of the APP/SSHP is expected to require one meeting with the Navy RPM, NTR, contractor and document reviewing Health & Safety Officer to support safety objective clarifications. The contractor shall use the “Template Accident Prevention Plan, Including Site Safety and Health Plan” as a foundation for this document. The contractor shall adhere to all NAVFAC NW instructions, EM 385-1-1, and SOPs. Any documentation referenced by the APP/SSHP must be 1) physically available to work crews during all field work, and 2) meet the standards of NAVFAC NW guidance, instruction, and SOPs at a minimum.
Safety shall be considered of primary importance in all activities conducted by the contractor.
1 x Health and Safety Plan
Addendums to the original APP/SSHP shall be prepared on an annual basis to update the original plan with new information.
1 x Addenda/Correction for Existing Document
All reports in this Task shall be developed in internal draft, draft, and final versions.
Subtask 2.4 Trend Analysis Report The contractor shall submit a trend and analysis reports on an annual basis. Reports shall include relevant historical data collected in previous years, but the contractor shall specifically consider and discuss recent data trends and seasonal effects on concentrations. Tables previously moved from other reports shall be included in the trend analysis report appendices to ensure complete data and information availability. The contractor shall analyze groundwater constituent concentrations and their change over time on a location specific basis, for each operable unit.
The trend analysis shall include all data collected prior to issue of the draft report. All data required to make decisions based on the applicable decision criteria shall be presented within the discussion. Additional data and information shall be included by appendix.
Data shall be reported to the Method Detection Limits (MDLs) matching the certification levels of analytical labs used. Reporting limits shall also be presented. Where applicable, discussion of reported value reliability, interpretation and trends shall be included. Trends shall be reported using graphs, figures and tables for comparisons of detected concentrations to the established regulatory levels prescribed in the RODs. The contractor shall also provide recommendations for changes to optimize the sampling and monitoring program in an easy to acquire format (such as bullets, tables, etc.).
Submission schedules shall adhere to the Deliverables Table below. Development of the trend analysis shall include at least one meeting to ensure stakeholder and regulator inclusion and acceptance as shown in Subtask 2.6.
1 x Technical Report Complex
Subtask 2.5 Remedy Inspection Report The contractor shall provide one inspection report after all remedy, land use control and institutional controls, wet weather, OU A winter inspections have been completed as described in the Deliverables Table below. The report shall be in accordance with project work plans including the Operations and Maintenance and Institutional Controls Plan, and the Long-Term Monitoring, Inspection, and Improvement Plan. The report shall include any inspection difficulties not initially overcome. A brief description of solutions attempted and plan of action to correct failed inspections shall be included. More complete information may be included in appendix format if not efficiently reportable otherwise.
1 x Technical Report Complex Est. Oversized plates
Subtask 2.6 Meetings Supporting Plan Development, Execution, and Reporting Meetings used to support the development of the project plans include the following:
2 x 4 Hr Technical – SAP (1 during development, 1 post performance) 1 x 4 Hr Technical – LTM, Inspection and Improvement Plan
| 1 x 4 Hr Technical – APP/SSHP |
| 2 x 4 Hr Technical – Sampling and Execution Coordination |
2 x 4 Hr Technical – Trend Analysis Report
| 2 x 4 Hr Technical – Remedy Inspection Report as determined necessary by the RPM |
| 1 x 4 Hr Technical – Project Lessons Learned (post performance) |
| Total = 11 x 4 hr Technical Meetings |
Meetings not specifically placed in Table 7.0 are intended to have greater schedule flexibility. In the event specific meetings are not used for specified purposes, they may be used elsewhere within the task order. These meetings may be conducted in person or by phone conference as approved by the RPM. Proposed meeting times shall be incorporated in the contractor’s schedule. The contractor shall provide meeting minutes to the RPM as shown in the Deliverables Schedule below. Corrections provided or forwarded by the RPM shall be incorporated in the final minutes.
Presentations will be included for the Project Management Team Technical Group and one presentation for Navy only for mid-year review of task order accomplishments and recommendations. Assume one presentation for every plan and report to be prepared for presentation to the stakeholders. Each presentation is assumed to be one hour in length. There are currently 4 plans and reports that are planned for distribution and review to the stakeholders. Each presentation will be in Power Point or similar format. The purpose of each presentation is to summarize the plan and report and to further explain technical aspects of the work to the stakeholders. Since preparation for presentation is assumed to be 3 hours and 1 hour to present.
Total = 4 Presentations x 4 hr
Subtask 2.7 Informal Meeting Supporting Operation and Execution Less formal meeting time to support operations and execution between PMs is provided for use throughout the SLIN. The primary participants shall be assumed as the NAVFAC NW RPM and the contractor’s PM or Task Order Manager. The contractor shall provide minutes of decisions and problem solutions per base contract schedule guidance via email.
Task 3 Project Sampling and Analysis The contractor shall provide all the necessary field crews, sampling equipment, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), security, transportation, technical oversight, and laboratory coordination, per the LTM Plans developed under Subtasks 2.1 and 2.2. The attached spreadsheet “NBK at Bremerton Sampling & Analysis” specify the locations, quantities, the types of field measurements, sampling, analysis for OU A, OU NSC, PMP, OU C, OU D, and OU B T. Meetings supporting sampling and analysis effort are shown in Subtask 2.9.
This task encompasses the costs and efforts to mobilize for LTM Terrestrial field sampling event including free product measurements in OU C. The contractor shall keep the Navy RPM and NTR informed of the scheduled sample days.
Task 4 Remedy Inspections The contractor shall inspect the remedies for OU A, OU B T, OU D, and OU NSC per all the requirements as specified in the updated O&M and IC Plan, the base contract and each applicable OU ROD. The contractor shall provide all the necessary field crews, equipment, PPE, security, transportation, and technical oversight and inspect the remedies per the updated plans in this SLIN.
The government will conduct security, excavation, real estate, ground water extraction, and construction site/project type inspections. The government will provide the results of these inspections to the contractor so that all the inspection results can be combined into the Annual Remedy Inspection Report. Augmentation to the government effort is provided in Subtask 4.4 below.
Subtask 4.1 OU A, OU B T, OU D, OU NSC Wet Weather Inspection Inspect OU A, OU B T, OU D, and OU NSC storm water systems during a wet weather event.
Note: OU D is currently owned and inspected by the City of Bremerton. Inspections should not be intrusive but shall cover those items reviewed during the site walk (“stone” pavers, concrete, asphalt, vegetation presence [as designed], obvious water infiltration, new excavations, etc.).
| Subtask 4.2 OU A, OU B T, OU B M, OU D, OU NSC Remedy Inspections |
| Inspect OU A, OU B M, OU B T, OU D, and OU NSC annually. |
Note: OU D is currently owned and inspected by the City of Bremerton. Inspections should not be intrusive but shall cover those items reviewed during the site walk (“stone” pavers, concrete, asphalt, vegetation presence [as designed], obvious water infiltration, new excavations, etc.).
Surveying shall be accomplished using equipment consistent with standards of the surveying industry.
| Subtask 4.3 OU A Winter Inspection |
| Inspect OU A during the winter in accordance with the most recent O&M and IC plan. |
Subtask 4.4a Land Use Control Inspections The contractor shall notify the NAVFAC NW RPM and NTR of excavation activity as encountered and observed. The intent is to assist the NAVFAC NW RPM and NTR in the opportunity to observe excavation and LUC related impacting activities. Estimate effort as conjunctive with field events scheduled for work accomplished within this task order.
Subtask 4.4b Institutional Control Inspections The contractor shall complete IC inspections for all the inspection frequencies and evaluation criteria identified in the O&M and IC Plan
Task 5 Project Waste Management Subtask 5.1 Waste Disposal Collect, store and dispose of all waste accumulated from this SLIN in accordance with the Waste Information Sheet (WIS) and most recent base instruction as required. This task is for actual management and/or disposal of waste following storage and characterization as required by the most recent guidance at the time of disposal. This SLIN shall include costs associated with waste collection, handling/management, storage and disposal. This SLIN shall include all waste generated/managed by this contractor on behalf of the ER program for the duration of this SLIN. The contractor shall adhere with facility guidance and instructions for management of waste (example: Satellite Accumulation Areas (SAAs) or similar). The contractor shall prepare all documentation (as previously required) and in a manner satisfactory to the facility waste managers, NAVFAC NW and, if required, appropriate regulators. All regulatory guidelines for waste handling, movement, timelines, and management shall be met. Actual effort to complete preparation of waste management documents and field preparation shall be included and described appropriately.
Task 6 Mobilization This Subtask encompasses the costs and efforts to mobilize for field sampling events, remedy inspections, other field work assigned. This includes the one-time mobilization. Mobilization costs not provided will not be considered.
Subtask 6.1 Mobilization for Field Work This Subtask encompasses the costs and efforts to mobilize for field sampling events, remedy inspections, and other field work assigned and is considered one-time mobilization.
Deliverable Requirements The contractor shall manage and dispose of wastes resulting from the work performed under this contract per Navy activity instructions and guidelines. They shall also comply with all applicable installation instructions and criteria regarding badging/security, outages, excavation permits, or other specific project exigencies. Timelines for the various procedures and requirements vary among each installation.
In addition to the general requirements, the contractor shall meet the terms and conditions of site specific performance work statement and performance requirements summary found in Table 7.0 below; “Deliverable Schedule.”
Deliverables shall be mailed directly to all recipients by the contractor as identified by the RPM for each deliverable. The contractor shall provide the RPM with the opportunity to review a sample of each deliverable prior to the contractor mailing directly to the recipients.
The period of performance of this SLIN is 15 months.
All deliverables shall undergo a technical review for technical accuracy of text, data tables, figures, photos, graphics and appendices, and trend analyses and appropriateness of conclusions and recommendations prior to submittal to the Navy and Agencies (if applicable) for review.
In addition, all deliverables shall undergo technical editing for consistency, organization, concise presentation of data, figures, photos, graphics, and information in appendices, and the accuracy of the table of contents and acronyms and abbreviations list prior to submittal to the Navy and Agencies (if applicable) for review.
Table 7 Deliverable Schedule
| TASK |
| DELIVERABLE ITEM / EVENT |
| DURATION |
(days* from award or prior task, or actual date) Number of Hard/Electronic Copies
Task 1 Project Management
| Project Schedules |
| Monthly (per Base Contract) |
| 0/1 (Distribution) |
Task 2 Project Plans
Subtask 2.1 LTM QAPP/SAP
| Response to Comments |
| 15 |
| - |
| Stakeholder Meeting1 |
| TBD Within Review Period |
| - |
| Response to Comments |
| 15SR |
| 0/1 |
| Stakeholder Meeting |
| TBD Post Performance |
| - |
Subtask 2.2 LTM, Inspection, and Improvement Plan
| Response to Comments |
| 15NR |
| 0/1 |
| Stakeholder Meeting1 |
| TBD Within Review Period |
| - |
| Response to Comments |
| 15SR |
| 0/1 |
Subtask 2.3 APP & SSHP
| Navy H&S Meeting1 |
| TBD Within Review Period |
| - |
| Response to Comments |
| 15NR |
| 0/1 |
Subtask 2.4 Trend Analysis Report
| Response to Comments |
| 15NR |
| 0/1 |
| Stakeholder Meeting1 |
| TBD Within Review Period |
| - |
| Response to Comments |
| 15SR |
| 0/1 |
Subtask 2.5 Annual Remedy Inspection Report
| Response to Comments |
| 15NR |
| 0/1 |
| Response to Comments |
| 15SR |
| 0/1 |
Subtask 2.6 Meetings and Presentations Supporting Plan Development, Execution, and Reporting
| Each Report Meeting |
| TBD |
| - |
Subtask 2.7 Informal Meeting Supporting Operation and Execution
| Each Report Meeting |
| TBD |
| - |
Task 3 Project Sampling and Analysis
Sampling and Analysis Event
| Waste Stream Authorizations |
| 35FS |
| 1/1 |
| Validated Data Submission |
| 65FWC |
| 0/1 |
Task 4 Remedy Inspections
Subtask 4.1 OU A, OU B T, OU NSC Wet Weather Inspection
| Access/Photo Authorizations |
| 35FS |
| 1/1 |
Subtask 4.2 OU A, OU B T, OU B M, OU D, OU NSC Remedy Inspection
| Access/Photo Authorizations |
| 35FS |
| 1/1 |
Subtask 4.3 OU A Winter Inspection
| Access/Photo Authorizations |
| 35FS |
| 1/1 |
Subtasks 4.4a/b Land Use Control and IC Inspections
| Completed Checklist submission |
| 15PW |
| 0/1 |
Task 5 Project Waste Management
Subtask 5.1 Waste Disposal
| Letter Report of Completed Waste Disposal Actions |
| 15PW |
| 0/1 |
Task 6 Mobilization
Subtask 6.1 Mobilization for Task Order Field Work
| Preparatory Meeting |
| TBD |
| - |
*Days are calendar days 1 Scheduling is dependent on stakeholder availability. Stakeholder meetings intended to be face-to-face primarily.
2 A copy of this document shall be delivered directly to the regulators and stakeholders (EPA, WADOE, Suquamish Tribe) after the Navy conducts a final review of the “redline” version of the plan or report and agrees the document is ready for delivery.
3 Letter Addendum to original report shall be submitted after analysis and validation is complete.
Note: Durations do not preclude early submission when possible. When early submissions occur, the next due date duration begins unless otherwise agreed in writing.
#Awd Calendar days from award of task order.
#FWC Calendar days from completion of field work.
#NR Calendar days from submission of Navy review.
#SR Calendar days from submission of Stakeholder review.
#SM Calendar days from completion of Stakeholder meeting.
#FS Calendar days BEFORE start of field work for this event.
#PW Calendar days from completion of waste disposal actions.
#MC Calendar days from completion of meeting.
#AC Calendar days from completion of analysis and validation.
The submittal of all deliverables, sampling data, and laboratory data packages required under this TO shall comply with Navy’s most recent (SOP) as described in section C7.2.1 of the Contract. A current copy of the Gantt chart shall be provided to the (RPM) and Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) via email on a monthly basis.
POINTS OF CONTACT:
Address:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest 1101 Tautog Circle Silverdale, Wa. 98315 Fax:(360) 396-0857
Points of Contact will be identified by separate correspondence N44255-19-R-6006 PWS ATTACHMENT K NBK-Bremerton LTM
Table: Performance Requirements Summary*
GENERAL CONTRACT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY:
AQL: Acceptable Quality Level
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Unsatisfactory |
(Did not Meet AQL) Marginal (Met AQL, but with difficulty) Satisfactory (Met AQL) Very Good (Exceeded AQL) Exceptional (Greatly Exceed AQL)
| Quality |
| Inferior quality of service/deliverables such that deficiencies were a detriment to the Navy mission. |
| Marginal quality of service/deliverables with a substantial number of deficiencies without detriment to the Navy mission. |
| Acceptable quality of service/deliverable |
| Quality of service/deliverable was such that it enhanced the Navy’s mission beyond AQL. |
| Quality of service/deliverable was such that it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission beyond the AQL. |
| Schedule |
| Missed scheduled events/deliverable dates |
| Meet scheduled events/deliverable dates but required Navy intervention |
| Meet scheduled events and deliverables as specified in task. |
| Scheduled event/deliverable requirements occurred earlier than scheduled |
| Early scheduled event/deliverable requirements with beneficial results for the government. |
| Management |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management were not able to fulfill contract/task performance requirements |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management were able to fulfill contract/task performance requirements, but required Navy intervention |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements and did so with actions/ideas that benefited the Navy beyond AQLs. |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements and did so using actions/ideas that greatly benefited the Navy beyond the AQLs. |
| Regulatory Compliance |
| Lack of regulatory compliance resulted in the Navy receiving a notice of non-compliance or violation |
| Lack of regulatory compliance threatened the Navy’s compliance or placed the Navy at risk of non-compliance or violation |
| Complied with Regulations and Codes |
| Exceeded Regulatory Compliance requirements to the benefit of the Navy |
| Exceeded Regulatory Compliance requirements such that it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission and/or relationship with Regulatory Agency |
| Safety |
| Loss time incidents occur without reporting MISHAP; demonstrated blatant disregard for safety of employees |
| Required excessive safety oversight and failed to fully implement EM-385-1-1. |
| Complied with EM 385-1-1 and contract requirements regarding safety |
| Contractor management and employees take active role in identifying, preventing and reporting safety mishaps, near misses, and good catches. |
| Safety Program exceeds expectations to the point where it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission. |
[*All task orders will be evaluated in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using the general contract evaluation criteria identified above. Additional or more detailed criteria may be developed for each task order Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any additional task order specific criteria shall have the evaluation criteria clearly noted in the table 5.1 above.] Appendix 1: NBK-Brem Monitoring Well Network
| Operable Unit |
| Well ID |
| Location Xref |
| Ecology Tag |
| Northing (ft) |
| Easting (ft) |
| Installation Date |
| Ground Elevation (ft MSL) |
| Casing Elevation (ft MSL) |
| Depth to Top of Screen (ft) |
| Screen Length (ft) |
| Depth to Bottom of Screen (ft) |
| Background |
| 346 |
| PS11-MW01L |
| BBF 024 |
| 210816.6 |
| 1193695.4 |
| 4/22/1991 |
| 132.7 |
| 134.5 |
| 295 |
| 5 |
| 300 |
| OU A |
| 203 |
| PS03-MW03 |
| BBF 013 |
| 207019.2 |
| 1189695.4 |
| 12/6/1990 |
| 11.2 |
| 11.24 |
| 7 |
| 9.5 |
| 16.5 |
| OU A |
| 204 |
| MW204 |
| BBF 012 |
| 206822.4 |
| 1189284.1 |
| 5/12/1993 |
| 10.76 |
| 10.43 |
| 8 |
| 15 |
| 23 |
| OU A |
| 206 |
| MW206 |
| BBF 014 |
| 207153.9 |
| 1189841.7 |
| 4/28/1993 |
| 9.32 |
| 9.06 |
| 8 |
| 15 |
| 23 |
| OU A |
| 241 |
| MW241 |
| BBF 015 |
| 207607.4 |
| 1190206.8 |
| 6/14/1994 |
| 10.64 |
| 10.65 |
| 6 |
| 15 |
| 21 |
| OU B T |
| 432 |
| PS07-MW03 |
| BBF 032 |
| 210621.1 |
| 1196141 |
| 3/18/1994 |
| 11.49 |
| 11.1 |
| 30 |
| 20 |
| 50 |
| OU B T |
| 433 |
| PS07-MW04 |
| BBF 033 |
| 210628.8 |
| 1196429.4 |
| 4/6/1994 |
| 11.57 |
| 10.99 |
| 48 |
| 15 |
| 63 |
| OU B T |
| 707 |
| OUB MW18 |
| BBF 008 |
| 210612 |
| 1195441.8 |
| 10/17/1995 |
| 11.83 |
| 11.42 |
| 45 |
| 20 |
| 65 |
| OU B T |
| 410R |
| NA |
| APS 279 |
| 208419.9 |
| 1193634.2 |
| 10/5/2007 |
| 11.9 |
| 11.9 |
| 55.7 |
| 10 |
| 65.7 |
| OU B T* |
| 8092 |
| VI-809 |
| TBD |
| 208346.2 |
| 1190895.7 |
| 15.62 |
| 15.33 |
| 4.75 |
| 15 |
| 19.75 |
| OU B T* |
| 8102 |
| VI-810 |
| TBD |
| 208277.3 |
| 1191003.2 |
| 15.49 |
| 15.16 |
| 4.75 |
| 15 |
| 19.75 |
| OU B T* |
| 8113 |
| VI-811 |
| TBD |
| 208460.0 |
| 1190889.4 |
| 15.61 |
| 15.41 |
| 2.75 |
| 10 |
| 12.75 |
| OU B T/PMP |
| 704 |
| OUB-MW15 |
| BBF 034 |
| 210618.6 |
| 1196900 |
| 8/22/1995 |
| 11.79 |
| 11.43 |
| 6 |
| 15 |
| 21 |
| OU B T/PMP |
| 720 |
| LTMP-1 |
| BBF 001 |
| 207686.3 |
| 1190425.5 |
| 7/19/2004 |
| 11.3 |
| 11.02 |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| 20 |
| OU B T/PMP |
| 721 |
| LTMP-2 |
| AKG 515 |
| 207692.6 |
| 1190840.4 |
| 7/21/2004 |
| 11.33 |
| 11.03 |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| 20 |
| OU B T/PMP |
| 722 |
| LTMP-3 |
| AKG 514 |
| 208197.2 |
| 1191356.6 |
| 7/21/2004 |
| 11.07 |
| 10.76 |
| 4 |
| 15 |
| 19 |
| OU B T/PMP |
| 723 |
| LTMP-4 |
| BBF 029 |
| 210016.1 |
| 1195015.6 |
| 7/20/2004 |
| 11.48 |
| 11.19 |
| 43 |
| 20 |
| 63 |
| OU B T/PMP |
| 724 |
| LTMP-5 |
| AKG 517 |
| 209755.7 |
| 1197728.6 |
| 7/22/2004 |
| 12.07 |
| 11.92 |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| 20 |
| OU C |
| 219 |
| GMWT-10 |
| BBF 020 |
| 209712.7 |
| 1193396.5 |
| 4/8/1997 |
| 89.4 |
| 91.16 |
| 118 |
| 25 |
| 143 |
| OU C |
| 223 |
| GMWT-14 |
| BBF 021 |
| 209604.6 |
| 1193339.7 |
| 4/17/1995 |
| 74.2 |
| 76.05 |
| 108 |
| 25 |
| 133 |
NBK-Brem Monitoring Well Network (continued)
| Operable Unit |
| Well ID |
| Location Xref |
| Ecology Tag |
| Northing (ft) |
| Easting (ft) |
| Installation Date |
| Ground Elevation (ft MSL) |
| Casing Elevation (ft MSL) |
| Depth to Top of Screen (ft) |
| Screen Length (ft) |
| Depth to Bottom of Screen (ft) |
| OU C |
| 224 |
| GMWT-15 |
| BBF 017 |
| 209462.9 |
| 1193377.5 |
| 4/18/1997 |
| 67.5 |
| 67.5 |
| 89 |
| 25 |
| 114 |
| OU C |
| 247 |
| GMWT-7 |
| BBF 023 |
| 209709.2 |
| 1193401 |
| 4/1/1997 |
| 53.8 |
| 54.99 |
| 84 |
| 26 |
| 110 |
| OU C |
| 311 |
| GMWT-9 |
| BBF 022 |
| 209441.8 |
| 1193488.6 |
| 4/4/1997 |
| 49 |
| 50.21 |
| 73 |
| 25 |
| 98 |
| OU C |
| 717 |
| GMWT-19 |
| BBF 019 |
| 209665.6 |
| 1193268.1 |
| 10/20/1998 |
| 90.6 |
| 90.14 |
| 117 |
| 25 |
| 142 |
| OU C |
| 718 |
| GMWT-18 |
| BBF 018 |
| 209538.2 |
| 1193323.1 |
| 10/23/1998 |
| 81.5 |
| 81.5 |
| 117 |
| 25 |
| 142 |
| OU C |
| 735 |
| GMWT-22 |
| BBF 011 |
| 209201.9 |
| 1193328.1 |
| 7/21/1999 |
| 12.1 |
| 12.08 |
| 34 |
| 20 |
| 54 |
| OU C |
| 736 |
| GMWT-23 |
| BBF 030 |
| 209184.7 |
| 1193477.2 |
| 7/23/1999 |
| 11.9 |
| 11.91 |
| 45 |
| 15 |
| 60 |
| OU C |
| 737 |
| GMWT-24 |
| BBF 031 |
| 209050.2 |
| 1193707.4 |
| 7/23/1999 |
| 18.4 |
| OU C |
| 738 |
| GMWT-25 |
| BBF 010 |
| 208967.3 |
| 1193494.5 |
| 7/26/1999 |
| 12 |
| 11.98 |
| 34 |
| 25 |
| 59 |
| OU C |
| GMWT-26 |
| NA |
| ARK 523 |
| 209173.1 |
| 1193464.4 |
| 4/11/2006 |
| 12.1 |
| 12.09 |
| 60 |
| 30 |
| 90 |
| OU NSC |
| 310R |
| NA |
| BBF 025 |
| 208473.3 |
| 1193220.8 |
| 10/10/2007 |
| 11.9 |
| 11.93 |
| 58.7 |
| 10 |
| 68.7 |
| OU NSC |
| 380 |
| MW380 |
| BBF 006 |
| 208269.3 |
| 1193175.3 |
| 6/27/1994 |
| 11.99 |
| 11.4 |
| 14 |
| 20 |
| 34 |
| OU NSC |
| 386 |
| MW386 |
| BBF 005 |
| 208696.5 |
| 1192516 |
| 7/12/1994 |
| 12.14 |
| 11.77 |
| 12 |
| 20 |
| 32 |
| OU BNSC/PMP |
| 392 |
| MW392 |
| BBF 003 |
| 208190.1 |
| 1192046.3 |
| 7/21/1994 |
| 11 |
| 11 |
| 6 |
| 20 |
| 26 |
| OU NSC/PMP |
| 392R |
| NA |
| BBF 004 |
| 208191.4 |
| 1192035.3 |
| 8/14/2008 |
| 11 |
| 11.24 |
| 25.5 |
| 10 |
| 35.5 |
| PMP |
| 382 |
| MW382 |
| BBF 009 |
| 208849.9 |
| 1193175.9 |
| 7/5/1994 |
| 12 |
| 12.07 |
| 38 |
| 20 |
| 58 |
| PMP |
| 406 |
| PS08-MW02A |
| BBF 035 |
| 209824.2 |
| 1196818.3 |
| 1/15/1991 |
| 10.83 |
| 10.5 |
| 13 |
| 9.5 |
| 22.5 |
| PMP |
| 406R |
| NA |
| BAN 056 |
| 209823.8 |
| 1196814.7 |
| 10/12/2007 |
| 10.9 |
| 10.9 |
| 23.2 |
| 10 |
| 33.2 |
| PMP |
| 412 |
| PS10C-MW01 |
| BBF 027 |
| 208256.3 |
| 1193992.9 |
| 2/8/1991 |
| 11.64 |
| 11.49 |
| 14.5 |
| 9.5 |
| 24 |
| PMP |
| 425 |
| OUB-MW04 |
| BBF 007 |
| 210731.6 |
| 1195809.9 |
| 4/5/1994 |
| 12.2 |
| 11.79 |
| 47 |
| 20 |
| 67 |
| PMP |
| 428R |
| NA |
| ALN 644 |
| 209005.2 |
| 1194172 |
| 1/31/2007 |
| 8.7 |
| 8.24 |
| 44 |
| 20 |
| 64 |
| PMP |
| 709 |
| OUB-MW23 |
| BBF 028 |
| 208369.5 |
| 1194430.2 |
| 8/14/1995 |
| 10.29 |
| 9.94 |
| 8 |
| 20 |
| 28 |
| PMP |
| 713 |
| OUB-MW-20 |
| BBF 026 |
| 208161 |
| 1193836.8 |
| 8/28/1995 |
| 11.8 |
| 11.48 |
| 8 |
| 20 |
| 28 |
| PMP |
| 718 |
| OUB-MW-25 |
| BBF 002 |
| 208310.1 |
| 1191312.4 |
| 8/30/1995 |
| 12.19 |
| 11.92 |
| 7 |
| 20 |
| 27 |
| PMP |
| 725 |
| PMP-1 |
| AKG 516 |
| 209027.4 |
| 1190745 |
| 7/22/2004 |
| 12.23 |
| 18.36 |
| 3 |
| 15 |
| 18 |
| PMP |
| 715R |
| NA |
| ALN 643 |
| 207763.9 |
| 1191143.2 |
| 1/29/2007 |
| 15 |
| 14.75 |
| 9 |
| 20 |
| 29 |
| OU NSC |
| 3111/ |
| MW386 |
| BBF 016 |
| 208186.6 |
| 1192897.9 |
| 4/13/1993 |
| 11.2 |
| 11.25 |
| 18 |
| 10 |
| 28 |
Notes:
Horizontal Position based upon Department of the Navy Naval Station Bremerton "Horizontal and Vertical Control Data" PWO Drawing 64583 dated July 11, 2006 and subsequent well surveys Vertical Datum based upon PSNS PWO Drawing 64583 (NGVD 1929) dated July 11, 2006 as noted above, and subsequent well surveys Blank cells occur where information is not available 1/ - Well 311 (MW386) appears to not be part of the LTM program. Well 311 (GMWT-9) is part of OU C.
2 These three new wells were installed as part of a vapor intrusion study. Continued sampling shall be accomplished with the LTM efforts.
* Not part of CERCLA or MTCA monitoring network.
