N4425519R6006_PWS_Attachment_I_Pt._McIntyre_rev.1.doc
DOC document 164 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LTMOM
- Solicitation number
- N4425519R6006
About this file
This document outlines the statement of work for a long-term monitoring, operations, and maintenance contract at the former Distant Early Warning Line Station at Point McIntyre, Alaska. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest is seeking environmental services to fulfill annual post-construction monitoring requirements at the site, which was used as an Arctic research station until 1980 and underwent environmental cleanup from 2004 to 2015.
The statement of work details tasks such as conducting land use inspections, surveying benchmarks, sampling groundwater monitoring wells, inspecting an on-site thermistor temperature monitoring system, and preparing associated monitoring reports. Deliverables include work plans, an environmental protection plan, waste management plan, accident prevention plan, and draft and final monitoring reports. Performance will be evaluated on criteria such as quality, schedule, management, regulatory compliance, and safety. The period of performance for response is 13 months from award.
N4425519R6006_PWS_Attachment_I_Pt._McIntyre_rev.1.doc
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N44255-19-R-6006 PWS Attachment I_rev.1
Pt McIntyre LTMOM
ATTACHMENT I
Long-Term Monitoring and Operation & Maintenance for Former Distant Early Warning Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska
STATEMENT OF WORK
LONG-TERM MONITORING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Contract #: N44255-19-R-6006, PWS Attachment I, Point McIntyre LTMOM Date: February 13, 2019
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND NORTHWEST
1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE SUITE 203
SILVERDALE WA 98315 1101
Long Term Monitoring
Former Distant Early Warning Line Station Point McIntyre, Alaska
INTRODUCTION:
NAVFAC NW is acquiring environmental services to fulfill the annual post-construction monitoring requirements, which will take into account the results and recommended changes to the monitoring program included in the First Five Year Review (Reference 1), at the Former Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line Station at Point McIntyre, Alaska. Sampling requirements for this site have been revised and reduced based on the recommendations made in the First Five-Year Review.
BACKGROUND:
The Former Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line Station at Point McIntyre is location on Gwydyr Bay of the Beaufort Sea, along the arctic coast of Alaska. The site is located approximately 4 miles northwest of the West Dock of Prudhoe Bay and 15 miles northwest of Deadhorse, Alaska. The site occupies approximately 17 acres on relatively flat terrain at an elevation of about 10 feet above mean sea level.
The Point McIntyre DEW Line Station was built during the 1950s by the Department of the Air Force on federal withdrawal land as a supplemental station to the Main DEW Line Station located at Cape Lisburne, Alaska. Several buildings, an airstrip, a fuel tank, and miscellaneous utilities were constructed at the site, which was positioned immediately adjacent to Gwydyr Bay. The Point McIntyre DEW Line Station was deactivated in 1958 and the land was transferred to the Department of the Navy for use as an arctic research station in 1965. Use of the facility ceased in 1980. Demolition of site structures and environmental cleanup of soil contamination at the site was completed in 2004. Following these activities, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) concurred with a no further action determination for the site, with the exception of the eroding landfill. Coastal erosion that exposed the shoreline side of the landfill and redistributed debris along the beach was documented in a series of environmental investigation and action documents, culminating in a Feasibility Study (Reference 2), Record of Decision (Reference 3), and Remedial Design (Reference 4).
The chosen remedial alternative for this site was excavation of the eroding landfill on the shoreline, segregation of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, placement of the non-hazardous waste in a new Freezeback Landfill in the onsite airstrip approximately 1200 feet inland, and offsite disposal of the hazardous wastes. The remedial action activities were conducted in the summer of 2013, 2014, and 2015, and the work is summarized in the 2013 After Action Report (Reference 5), 2014 After Action Report (Reference 6), and 2015 After Action Report Addendum (Reference 7). The first three annual post-construction monitoring events were conducted in the summers of 2015, 2016 and 2017 (References 8 through 10).
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this SLIN is to conduct the annual post-construction monitoring activities as described below.
APPLICABLE DIRECTIVES AND DOCUMENTS
| REF |
| TITLE |
| DATE |
| 1 |
| Final First Five Year Review, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| July 2018 |
| 2 |
| Final Feasibility Study, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| May 2009 |
| 3 |
| Final Record of Decision, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| May 2012 |
| 4 |
| Final Landfill and Stabilization Design, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Oct 2012 |
| 5 |
| Final After Action Report, Landfill Removal and Freezeback Landfill Construction, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Aug 2014 |
| 6 |
| Final After Action Report, Landfill Removal and Freezeback Landfill Construction (2014 Field Season), Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| July 2015 |
| 7 |
| Final After Action Report Addendum, Landfill Removal and Freezeback Landfill Construction (2015 Field Season), Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Apr 2016 |
| 8 |
| Final Post-Construction Monitoring Report 2015, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| May 2016 |
| 9 |
| Final Post-Construction Monitoring Report 2016, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Jan 2017 |
| 10 |
| Final Post-Construction Monitoring Report 2017, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Mar 2018 |
| 11 |
| Final Post-Construction Monitoring Plan, Rev 1, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| July 2015 |
| 12 |
| NAVFAC NW Standard Operating Procedures |
| Current Version |
| 13 |
| Final Appendix F, Management and Monitoring Approach Sampling and Analysis Plan, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| July 2017 |
| 14 |
| Polar Bear – Human Interaction Plan, Landfill Removal and Freezeback Landfill Construction, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| June 2018 |
| 15 |
| North Slope Borough Department of Planning and Community Services, Land Management Regulations Permit, Permit number 13-436 amendment 6, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Mar 2015 |
| 16 |
| United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Letter of Effect Determination for Threatened and Endangered Species, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Dec 2017 |
| 17 |
| USFWS Marine Mammal Office Letter of Authorization for Incidental Take, LOA 17-INT-10, Former DEW Line Station, Point McIntyre Alaska |
| Aug 2017 |
| 18 |
| 2017 Environmental Protection Plan, Former Distant Early Warning Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| Aug 2017 |
| 19 |
| 2017 Waste Management Plan, Former Distant Early Warning Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| July 2017 |
| 20 |
| US Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) EM 385 1-1, (Current Version) |
| Nov 2014 |
| 21 |
| Plans for 2016 Long-Term Monitoring and Inspections, Including: |
· Accident Prevention Plan
· Appendices to Accident Prevention Plan including Site Safety and Health Plan and Activity Hazard Analyses July 2016
| 22 |
| 2017 Site Safety and Health Plan, Former Distant Early Warning Line Station, Point McIntyre, Alaska |
| July 2017 |
| 23 |
| North Slope Environmental Field Handbook, BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BPXA), Caelus Energy Alaska Inc., ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc., Eni Petroleum Co. Inc., ExxonMobil Alaska Production Inc., Hilcorp Alaska LLC, Savant Alaska LLC (Current Version) |
| Aug 2016 |
| 24 |
| Alaska Safety Handbook, ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc., Armstrong Energy, BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., Brooks Range Petroleum, Caelus Energy Alaska, Eni US Operating Co. Inc., ExxonMobil, Hilcorp Alaska (Current Version) |
| Feb 2018 |
| 25 |
| Email: Remote Access Thermistor System Setup, Email is between Michael O’Hare (TetraTech) and Kendra Leibman (NAVFAC NW), Steve Gray (TetraTech), Andrew Schmeising (TetraTech), and Cory Byerley (RST Instruments). |
| Sep 26, 2014 |
| 26 |
| Thermistor Datalogger Communication Instructions, Operators Manual, CR800 Measurement and Control System, Revision 5/13 |
| Sep 2014 |
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the general requirements detailed in the basic contract, the contractor shall meet the terms and conditions of site specific performance work statement. The performance requirements summary found in the “Performance Requirements Summary” in Table 1 at the end of this performance work statement will be used to evaluate how well the contractor meets the performance requirements of this task order.
The contractor shall provide the technical effort in the work areas listed below per the tasks and their associated schedules as described below.
TASK 01
Project Management
Subtask 0101 Project Management
The contractor shall perform all necessary project management tasks associated with this work. The period of performance for this work is 13 months. Project management shall include: routine project administration, correspondence, scheduling, mobilizing the project team, cost tracking, budgeting, preparation of monthly invoices, and overall management of the project. In addition, the contractor shall coordinate with the Navy and other personnel to manage tasks required for completing the project. The Program Manager shall be responsible for communicating with the Navy’s Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and Remedial Project Manager (RPM) of any problems that arise and to identify corrective solutions. The contractor shall maintain schedules and staffing levels for responsive performance. A project schedule shall be coordinated with the Navy RPM, and it shall be provided in electronic format, compatible with Adobe Acrobat and MS Project. An initial schedule shall be prepared then updated monthly and forwarded to both the Navy RPM and COR.
SubTask 102 Project Meetings The contractor shall conduct a Preconstruction/Mutual Understanding Meeting (PreCON/MUM) prior to the field work. The contractor shall send the meeting agenda no later than five working days before the meeting. The contractor’s Task Order Manager and Field Team shall attend the meeting. The meeting shall take place via teleconference and the contractor shall assume the meeting will be 2 hours in duration. The contractor shall take notes at the meeting and send the meeting notes to the Navy RPM no later than five days after the PreCON/MUM.
The contractor shall conduct one meeting after the field event to discuss the results of the 2017 post-construction monitoring event and the Navy’s comments on the Internal Draft of the Post-Construction Monitoring Report. The contractor shall send the meeting agenda no later than five working days before the meeting. The contractor’s Task Order Manager and Field Team shall attend the meeting. The meeting shall take place via teleconference and the contractor shall assume the meeting will be 4 hours in duration. The contractor shall take notes at the meeting and send the meeting notes to the Navy RPM no later than five days after the post-field event meeting.
TASK 02
Work Plans
The contractor shall prepare Draft and Final Work Plans as described in Subtask 0201, 0202, 0203, and 0204. The contractor shall submit the Draft Work Plans to ADEC, Tuzzy Consortium Library, and the Navy for review and comment, except as noted below. The contractor shall prepare responses to comments for the Internal Draft and Draft Work Plans and submit electronically to the Navy for review. The contractor shall submit the Final Work Plans to ADEC, Tuzzy Consortium Library, and the Navy after the responses are approved by all stakeholders and incorporated into the Final Work Plans.
Subtask 0201 Post-Construction Monitoring Plan The contractor shall comply with the Final Post-Construction Monitoring Plan (PCMP) for the post-construction monitoring event (Ref 11). The PCMP provides descriptions of post-construction activities for site inspections, surveying, groundwater, thermistor, and shoreline erosion monitoring.
The PCMP also describes laboratory analytical testing for groundwater samples collected from specific locations at the former eroding landfill location to assess the quality of water migrating from the former eroding landfill location to Gwydyr Bay (see the Management and Monitoring Approach SAP in Appendix F of Reference 11). The contractor shall meet all the laboratory analytical requirements in Appendix F, but may use a different analytical laboratory and data validators as listed; however, the contractor shall utilize a laboratory that is accredited by both the Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) and ADEC. Additionally, the contractor is to include costs for shipping samples to the laboratory in their proposal for this SLIN. NOTE: In 2016 the Navy received approval from ADEC to eliminate Hexavalent Chromium and Tributyltin from the groundwater analytical list, so the contractor shall not analyze for these analytes.
The contractor shall utilize level IV data validation (Reference 12) and complete ADEC checklists for this effort. The contractor shall annually update the Management and Monitoring Approach (MMA) SAP (found in Appendix F of Reference 11). This will be done to capture any changes to the MMA SAP (such as utilizing a different laboratory or data validator as listed in the current MMA SAP or utilizing a different laboratory or Analytical Method to accommodate changes in regulatory cleanup standards) that would be necessary for the Navy to effectively manage the site. The contractor shall use Reference 13 as an example of an updated MMA SAP.
In addition to Draft and Final Work Plans, the contractor shall provide the Navy Remedial Project Manager (RPM) with an internal draft Management and Monitoring Approach (MMA) SAP. The Navy RPM will upload the Internal Draft MMA SAP to the NIRIS document review module for the NAVFAC LANT Chemist review. The contractor shall also provide an electronic red-lined Draft Final copy to the Navy RPM and upload it to the NIRIS Document Review Module for final NAVFAC LANT approval.
Provisions are also included in the PCMP for soil sampling in the event that breaches in the Freezeback Landfill containment are observed; however, the soil sampling is NOT part of the scope of this SLIN.
Subtask 0202 Environmental Protection Plan
The contractor shall develop Internal Draft, Draft and Final site-specific Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) that ensures that the work performed by the contractor is in compliance with environmental protection regulations applicable to this project. The EPP shall include a short discussion of the following items: Applicable Regulations, Biological Resources, Spill and Release Procedures, and Training. The contractor shall comply with the Point McIntyre Polar Bear – Human Interaction Plan (Reference 14), North Slope Borough Land Use Permit (Reference 15), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Letter of Effect Determination for Threatened and Endangered Species (Reference 16). If the contractor utilizes a different mode of transportation than described in Reference 15 to get to/from the site from the general road system, such as a helicopter, then the contractor shall update the Reference 15 at least 60 days before the field event. The contractor shall submit the revised permit application to the North Slope Borough for approval, and then the contractor shall follow the revised permit. This North Slope Borough permit will expire after the 2019 field work. At this time, the contractor shall submit an application to renew this permit for field work occurring after 2019. If the contractor utilizes a different mode of transportation than described in Reference 16, then the contractor shall notify the government and reinitiate informal consultation with the USFWS to update the Letter of Effect Determination (Reference 16) at least 60 days before the field event.
The contractor will request a new Letter of Authorization (LOA) for Incidental Take for each field event. The contractor shall then comply with the LOA for the duration of each field event. In August 2017, the government received a Letter of Authorization for Incidental Take (Deterrence) of Polar Bears (17-INT-10) from the USFWS Marine Mammal Office for the 2017 field activities at Point McIntyre (Reference 17). The contractor can use this letter as an example for what to expect in a Letter of Authorization for Incidental Take. The contractor shall use the Plans for 2017 Long-Term Monitoring and Inspections, Environmental Protection Plan (Reference 18) as a point of reference for producing the 2019 EPP. For the 2020 and subsequent years’ EPP Plans, the contractor can use the prior year’s EPP as a point of reference for the current year’s EPP.
Subtask 0203 Waste Management Plan
The contractor shall develop Internal Draft, Draft, and Final site-specific Waste Management Plan (WMP) that ensures that investigative derived waste is handled by the contractor in compliance with the waste management regulations applicable to this project. The contractor shall document in the WMP the contractual, legal, and risk-management requirements in the generation, storage, sampling and analysis, waste typing, transportation, treatment, and ultimate disposal of all waste for each task order; and to assure that waste generated in the course of the fieldwork is safely managed and disposed in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. The contractor shall use the 2017 Waste Management Plan (Reference 19) as a point of reference for producing the 2019 Waste Management Plan. For the 2020 and subsequent years’ Waste Management Plans, the contractor can use the prior year’s Waste Management Plan as a point of reference for the current year’s Waste Management Plan.
Subtask 0204 Accident Prevention Plan/Site Safety and Health Plan
The contractor shall develop an Accident Prevention Plan/Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP). This plan must comply with the most current version of US Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) EM 385 1-1 (Reference 20). The APP/SSHP does not require ADEC or the public review, so the contractor shall deliver this plan to the Navy only. This plan will be developed in Draft and Final versions only as a separate document. The contractor shall use the 2016 and 2017 Point McIntyre APP/SSHP (Reference 21-22) as points of reference for producing the 2019 APP/SSHP. For the 2020 and subsequent years’ APPs/SSHPs, the contractor can use the prior year’s APP/SSHP as a point of reference for updating the current year’s APP/SSHP.
TASK 03
Field Work
Subtask 0301 Mobilization/Demobilization
The contractor shall conduct all the necessary subtasks to mobilize and demobilize all personnel, equipment, and materials to conduct the annual post-construction field work successful per the approved work plans. All field contract personnel performing work onsite under this SLIN must complete the North Slope Training Cooperative (NSTC) Unescorted Course prior to mobilization to the site. The contractor shall provide a Bear Guard/Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) III to be on site for all project activities and the contractor shall abide by the most recent version of the North Slope Environmental Field Handbook (Reference 23), Alaska Safety Handbook (Reference 24), and all approved work plans and permits/authorizations. The contractor shall obtain all necessary access agreements for mobilization/demobilization to/from the Point McIntyre site. The contractor shall also obtain all the necessary access agreements for the Navy Remedial Project Manager to conduct oversight of the project. In 2013-2018, the Navy’s contractors have been required by the British Petroleum (BP) Exploration (Alaska), Inc. to obtain a Prudhoe Bay (PB) West Dock User Contract. This contract is required for moorage at West Dock. The contractor is responsible for obtaining the permit/contract that will enable the government to use the West Dock as a launching point for field work.
Subtask 0302 Land Use Visual Inspection
The contractor shall complete a land use inspection checklist and take photographs to document the results of the land use inspection. The checklist to be completed for the land use inspection is included in Appendix A of the Post-Construction Monitoring Plan (PCMP) (Reference 11). The contractor shall take photographs to document the overall site conditions from designated monuments that were installed during the remedial action as well as other locations deemed appropriate to document specific conditions identified during the inspection. The contractor shall take the photographs in each direction indicated by the directional arrows in the PCMP (Reference 11).
Subtask 0303 Level Survey of Site Benchmarks
The contractor shall conduct a level survey between the three survey permanent control points that were installed during the remedial action in order to ensure that notable settlement or monument movement has not occurred since the remedial action. The contractor shall note any disturbance and repair any damaged survey benchmarks. This work must be conducted by a licensed professional surveyor in the State of Alaska. Horizontal and vertical accuracies for the surveying work shall be similar to the accuracies of past surveying work completed at this site (Reference 8-10).
Subtask 0304 Groundwater Sampling
The contractor shall conduct groundwater sampling at the five groundwater monitoring locations (GWML-1, GWML-2, GWML-3, GWML-4, and GWML-5). If the wells are damaged, missing, or run-dry, the contractor shall replace the wells and survey the location and elevations of the new wells. For the well installation effort, the contractor is to assume that all 5 wells (5 feet maximum in length) will need to be reinstalled. The contractor shall utilize the same well installation and groundwater sampling standard operating procedures that were approved in the PCMP (Reference 11). The contractor shall only provide results for pentachlorophenol using Method 8270D SIM. The contractor shall select a lab whose SIM method’s limit of quantitation (LOQ) value is less than ADEC’s pentachlorophenol groundwater cleanup level listed in 18 AAC 75.345 Table C (January 2018 version).
For the 2017 field event, the Navy developed a table (see below) detailing the quantity and type of analyses for groundwater. The contractor shall use this table as a reference when developing costs, but shall also consult the PCMP to ensure that the information in the table below is correct. Additionally, the contractor shall also confirm with the Navy Remedial Project Manager and the PCMP prior to completing each field event that all the analyses contained in the table below are appropriate.
| Analytical Parameter |
| Analytical Method |
| Quantity of Samples |
| Total Sample Quantity |
| Volatile Organic Compounds – Benzene |
| 8260 C |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD, 3 TB |
| 10 |
| Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Low-Level) – naphthalene & 2,4 – dinitrotoluene |
| 8270D |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
| Pentachlorophenol |
| 8270D SIM |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
| Diesel Range Organics (Small Volume) |
| Method AK 102 |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
| Arsenic |
| 6010C or 6020A |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
| Cadmium |
| 6010C or 6020A |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
| Reductive precipitation procedure (prior to analysis of Metals by 6020A) |
| 1640 |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
| Cyanide |
| 9012B |
| 5 FS, 1 FD, 1 MS/MSD |
| 7 |
Subtask 0305 Thermistor Monitoring System Inspection
A total of 14 thermistor strings (140 thermistor points) are installed in the Freezeback Landfill. The layout and details of the thermistor temperature monitoring system is in the 2014 After Action Report (Reference 6). The thermistor strings are connected to a single data logger through cabling that is buried in the waste and exterior containment berms surrounding the Freezeback Landfill. The thermistors automatically collect data (daily) at 12:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (Alaska Daylight Time [AKDT] in summer and Alaska Standard Time [AKST] in winter) and transmit the information to the data logger for storage. The system is telemetered for remote system monitoring using a cell modem and network. The contractor shall ensure that the data logger automatically transmits data to the workstation twice weekly at 12:00 p.m. (AKDT/AKST) on Mondays and Fridays for periodic downloading. At this time, the data is automatically uploaded to a website for the Navy to view the data at all times (www.ptmacthermdata.com).
The contractor shall use only one workstation to perform downloads and collect the raw data, since only one terminal can connect to the modem at any given time. The contractor shall ensure that the thermistor data is downloaded to the datalogger, transmitted to the workstation, and uploaded to the website successfully for the duration of each task order under this SLIN. Refer to Reference 25 and 26 for instructions to setup the datalogger communication for Loggernet and Geoviewer.
Prior to departing Deadhorse, AK, the contractor shall ensure data is being transmitted and uploaded to the website. If data transmissions stop during this task order, the contractor shall notify the government. The contractor shall then investigate why the data transmissions have stopped and provide a remedy to the government.
During the field work, the contractor shall inspect the thermistor cables for damage by walking the length of all installed cable and noting any disturbance or potential breach in the installed transfer cable. The contractor shall include the notes from this inspection in the Land Use Checklist, which is in Appendix A of the PCMP (Reference 11). The contractor shall document the inspection with photographs. The contractor shall notify the NAVFAC NW RPM immediately if any cable is damaged or potentially damaged. The contractor shall replace the batteries in the thermistor data-logger and the telemetry battery power supply (this powers the modem) with the appropriate batteries made provided by RST Instruments. The replacement battery must be fully charged and capable of collecting and transmitting a minimum of one year of data from the thermistor temperature system prior to losing charge at the current data download frequency (twice a day at 12:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. [AKDT/AKST]).
TASK 04
Post-Construction Monitoring Report
The contractor shall prepare an Internal Draft, Draft, and Final Report. The contractor shall submit an Internal Draft Report to the Navy for review and prepare responses to all comments on the Internal Draft Report. The contractor shall submit the Draft Report to ADEC (Anchorage, AK), the Tuzzy Consortium Library (Barrow, AK), and the Navy (Silverdale, WA) for review and comment. The contractor shall prepare responses to all comments on the Draft Report and provide them to the Navy for review. The contractor shall submit the Final Report to ADEC, Tuzzy, and the Navy.
The report shall contain the findings from the land use visual inspection, level survey of site benchmarks, groundwater sampling/analysis, thermistor monitoring system inspection, and the shoreline erosion monitoring. The contractor shall include a comparison of the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and all subsequent years’ groundwater data with the appropriate cleanup levels. The contractor shall include the survey data for newly installed wells, depth to water, and any unusual observations in and around the well locations (i.e., soil staining, sheen, odors, etc.). The contractor shall include charts of temperature readings verses time (date) for each thermistor string (10 points on each chart). For any data that exceed freezing temperature (32 degrees Fahrenheit), the time frame that the temperature was exceeded, location, elevation, and thermistor identification number will be identified and reported immediately to the NAVFAC NW RPM, as well as included in the report.
All analytical data generated by the laboratory shall be reviewed by the Contractor’s Project Chemist to ensure the validity of the reported data prior to submittal to Naval Installation Restoration Information Solution (NIRIS). NIRIS data submittals shall be coordinated with the Command NIRIS Regional Data Manager (RDM) for inclusion into NIRIS. The contractor shall acquire a PKI e-Token (smart card), complete the Navy’s Information Assurance (IA) training, and obtain a NAVFAC Portal and NIRIS account prior to uploading the NIRIS Electronic Data Deliverable (NEDD) files to the DataChecker. NIRIS shall include installation-wide data related to:
· Environmental tabular data: The contractor shall submit all relevant environmental tabular data using the NIRIS NEDD format as outlined in the current NEDD SOP. The contractor shall identify the appropriate NEDD tables to populate and obtain approval from the RPM to ensure completeness. All location information shall be provided in X-Y coordinates. All flagged analytical results shall be explained in the body of the report.
· Environmental geospatial data: The contractor shall submit all spatial information in accordance with the current U.S. Navy Data Model and in accordance with the most recent NAVFAC NW SOPs (Reference 12). The following minimum requirements apply:
· Contractor-defined feature class (GIS layers) may only be submitted if the content is not addressed in USN Data Model, Environmental Sections 4-5, otherwise the content must be compliant with the standard.
· All geospatial data shall be submitted according to the following installation-specific geodetic parameters:
· Coordinate System: Alaska State Plan, Zone 4
· Horizontal Datum: NAD 27
· Vertical Datum: NOAA MLLW, 1983-2001 epoch
· All field surveys shall incorporate at least 2 control points as defined in NAVFAC NW SOPs (Reference 12).
· All geospatial data shall be delivered in ArcGIS V9.3 File Geodatabase format (or more current File Geodatabase format).
The contractor shall distribute the annual LTM report to the recipients in the table below. The contractor shall confirm the recipients of the project report for NAVFAC Northwest and ADEC with the current Navy remedial project manager.
DELIVERABLES
The period of performance and deliverable durations for each task order under this SLIN are shown below. The period of performance is 13 months from the date of award for each task order.
All deliverables shall undergo a technical review for technical accuracy of text, data tables, figures, photos, graphics and appendices, and trend analyses and appropriateness of conclusions and recommendations prior to submittal to the Navy and Agencies (if applicable) for review.
In addition, all deliverables shall undergo technical editing for consistency, organization, concise presentation of data, figures, photos, graphics, and information in appendices, and the accuracy of the table of contents and acronyms and abbreviations list prior to submittal to the Navy and Agencies (if applicable) for review.
| Task or Subtask |
| Deliverable or Event |
| Duration |
| No. Hard Copies / Electronic Copies |
| 0101 |
| Initial Project Schedule |
| Within 5 days of award |
| 0/2 Navy RPM and COR |
| 0101 |
| Monthly Schedule Updates |
| Monthly |
| 0/2 Navy RPM and COR |
| 0201, 0202, and 0203 |
| Internal Draft Work Plans (PCMP, EPP, and WMP) |
| 20 |
| 1/1 each plan Navy RPM |
| 0201, 0202, and 0203 |
| Navy, LANT Review |
| 15 |
| 0201, 0202, and 0203 |
| Draft Plans (PCMP, EPP, and WMP and APP/SSHP) |
| 15 |
| 1/1 Navy RPM |
1/1 ADEC
1/1 Tuzzy
| 0204 |
| Draft APP/SSHP |
| 15 |
| 2/2 Navy RPM |
| 0201, 0202, 0203, and 0204 |
| Navy, LANT & Stakeholder Review |
| 15 |
| 0201, 0202, 0203, and 0204 |
| Response to Comments |
| 10 |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 0201 |
| Draft Final PCMP |
| 10 |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 0201 |
| Navy Review (LANT only) |
| 7 |
| 0201 |
| Response to Comments |
| 7 |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 0201, 0202, and 0203 |
| Final Plans (PCMP, EPP, and WMP) |
| 7 |
| 2/2 Navy RPM |
1/1 ADEC
1/1 Tuzzy
| 0204 |
| Final APP/SSHP |
| 7 |
| 2/2 Navy RPM |
| 0102 |
| Draft PreCON/MUM Agenda |
| NLT 5 days ahead of the meeting |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 0102 |
| PreCon/MUM Meeting |
| 1 |
| 0102 |
| PreCON/MUM Meeting Minutes |
| Within 5 days after the meeting |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 03 |
| MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION |
| 3 |
| 03 |
| Field Event (NOT INCLUDING MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION or WEATHER DAYS) |
| 4 |
| 03 |
| Sample Analytical Results |
| 30 |
| 03 |
| Analytical Results Validation |
| 20 days after receipt of sample analytical results |
| 04 |
| Internal Draft Post-Construction Monitoring Report |
| 25 |
| 1/1 Navy RPM |
| 04 |
| Navy Review of Post-Construction Monitoring Report |
| 15 |
| 0102 |
| Draft Post-Field Event Meeting Agenda |
| NLT 5 days ahead of the meeting |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 0102 |
| Post-Field Event Meeting |
| 1 |
| 0102 |
| Post-Field Event Meeting Minutes |
| Within 5 days after the meeting |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 04 |
| Response to Comments |
| 15 |
| 0/1 by email Navy RPM |
| 04 |
| Draft Post-Construction Monitoring Report |
| 15 |
| 1/1 Navy RPM |
1/1 ADEC
1/1 Tuzzy
| 04 |
| Stakeholder Review of Post-Construction Monitoring Report |
| 20 |
| 04 |
| Response to Comments |
| 15 |
| 0/1 Navy RPM |
| 04 |
| Final Post-Construction Monitoring Report |
| 10 |
| 2/2 Navy RPM |
1/1 ADEC
1/1 Tuzzy
Note:
Days are working days
The submittal of all deliverables, sampling data and laboratory data packages, required under this Delivery Order shall be in accordance with the NAVFAC NW’s most recent Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (Reference 12).
POINTS OF CONTACT:
Specific points of contact will be provided upon award of this task.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest
ATTN: TBD
1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 203
Silverdale, WA 98315 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Contaminated Sites Program
ATTN: TBD
610 University Avenue
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3643 Tuzzy Consortium Library
ATTN: Christine Burke
P.O. Box 2130
Barrow, AK 99723
Table 1: Performance Requirements Summary
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Unsatisfactory |
(Did not Meet AQL) Marginal
(Met AQL, but with difficulty) Satisfactory
(Met AQL) Very Good
(Exceeded AQL) Exceptional
(Greatly Exceed AQL)
| Quality |
| Inferior quality of service/deliverables such that deficiencies were a detriment to the Navy mission. |
| Marginal quality of service/deliverables with a substantial number of deficiencies without detriment to the Navy mission. |
| Acceptable quality of service/deliverable |
| Quality of service/deliverable was such that it enhanced the Navy’s mission beyond AQL. |
| Quality of service/deliverable was such that it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission beyond the AQL. |
| Schedule |
| Missed scheduled events/deliverable dates |
| Meet scheduled events/deliverable dates but required Navy intervention |
| Meet scheduled events and deliverables as specified in task. |
| Scheduled event/deliverable requirements occurred earlier than scheduled |
| Early scheduled event/deliverable requirements with beneficial results for the government. |
| Management |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management were not able to fulfill contract/task performance requirements |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management were able to fulfill contract/task performance requirements, but required Navy intervention |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements and did so with actions/ideas that benefited the Navy beyond AQLs. |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements and did so using actions/ideas that greatly benefited the Navy beyond the AQLs. |
| Regulatory Compliance |
| Lack of regulatory compliance resulted in the Navy receiving a notice of non-compliance or violation |
| Lack of regulatory compliance threatened the Navy’s compliance or placed the Navy at risk of non-compliance or violation |
| Complied with Regulations and Codes |
| Exceeded Regulatory Compliance requirements to the benefit of the Navy |
| Exceeded Regulatory Compliance requirements such that it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission and/or relationship with Regulatory Agency |
| Safety |
| Loss time incidents occur without reporting MISHAP; demonstrated blatant disregard for safety of employees |
| Required excessive safety oversight and failed to fully implement EM-385-1-1. |
| Complied with EM 385-1-1 and contract requirements regarding safety |
| Contractor management and employees take active role in identifying, preventing and reporting safety mishaps, near misses, and good catches. |
| Safety Program exceeds expectations to the point where it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission. |
1 | Page
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .