AMENDMENT 0009.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT J 1 5

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 0009 09 Jul 2026 SEE CONTINUATION SHEET

6. ISSUED BY Code N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK, VA 23511

UNITED STATES

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N4008526R0053

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04 Mar 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning _1 _ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

DESIGN-BUILD, MARINE CORPS BARRACKS INITIATIVE (PACKAGE #1) MARINE CORPS AIR STATION, CHERRY

POINT, NORTH CAROLINA

The Phase II proposal due date of 14 July 2026 NLT than 2:00 EDT remains unchanged.

SEE CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.1-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

N40085-26-R-0053

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:

1. Phase II proposal due date of 14 July 2026 NLT 1400 EDT remains unchanged.

2. Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) responses (attached separately)

1. PHASE II PROPOSAL DUE DATE OF 14 JULY 2026 NLT 1400 EDT REMAINS UNCHANGED.

2. PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY RESPONSES:

Question

Reference Question Government Response

Page Section Paragraph

243 RFP Part 3 Section

3.1.2.13

RFP Part 3 Section 3.1.2.13 states that the project site is located within

AICUZ 65 to 70 dBA DNL noise zone. Can the GOVT please confirm?

Confirmed

244 RFP

UFC 3-

101-01 Table 3-1

The limited sound isolation performance of commercially available wall-mounted PTACs may result in the building façade not conforming with the composite sound isolation performance requirement in Table 3-1 of UFC 3-

101-01, particularly in the 2+0 and accessible rooms.

Table 3-1 of UFC 3-101-01 requires that the building façade elements provide 1/3 octave band transmission data from 80 Hz to 4000 Hz in order for a composite OITC rating to be determined.

Can the GOVT confirm that the project site is required to meet the requirements of Table 3-1 of UFC 3-

101-01 and, if so, can the GOVT provide a PTAC manufacturer that they know have sound transmission loss sound data from 80 Hz to 4000

Hz for the PTAC unit alone that can comply with Table 3-1 requirements when installed in a wall?

See response to PPI #92.

245 RFP

UFC 3-

101-01 Table 3-1

Is the project required to use wall-mounted PTACs in these rooms even though there may not be commercially available mitigation options for the PTACs that would allow building façade (wall, window, See response to PPI #92.

and PTAC) to comply with the composite sound isolation performance requirement in Table 3-

1 of UFC 3-101-01? If so, can the

GOVT provide intel on PTAC units that will comply along with the

PTAC unit’s sound transmission loss sound data from 80 Hz to 4000 Hz?

Otherwise, please confirm that the project is required to meet the requirements of Table 3-1 of UFC 3-

101-01 and provide amended RFP language for an alternative HVAC system that should be used?

GOVT

Response to PPI 200

UFC 1-

200-02

Paragraph

4-2

The Government's response to PPI

No. 200 states that LCCAs are required throughout design as stated in UFC 1-200-02. UFC 1-200-02

(Paragraph 4-2) states "In Design

Build projects, the LCCA is prepared for each building in the project during the development of the solicitation package, or Request for

Proposal. The resulting system and feature selections are incorporated as requirements in the DB RFP." Per

UFC 1-200-02, the requirement of the DB team to perform LCCA's is limited to post Award effort and effort to justify deviations from the

RFP requirements. As previously stated, the results of any LCCAs completed during the DB team's post

Award design effort is not a biddable

RFP requirement. Can the GOVT provide the results of the LCCA's they've prepared for this RFP effort?

If not; then relative to on-site renewable energy, solar domestic hot water, outdoor water use, outdoor water meters, and alternative water sources; can the GOVT provide biddable quantities, assumptions, guideline values, etc. to be used by

Primes to hard bid this Project?

RFP is result of LCCAs.

Propose per RFP.

GOVT PPI

Responses 19 and 185

Please review your responses to PPI's

19 and 185. The questions have to do with whether or not the windows in the 2+0 Rooms are required to be operable. The response to PPI 19 states they are not to be operable while the response to PPI 185 states they are to be operable. Can the

GOVT provide one clear response as to whether or not operable windows are required at the 2+0 Rooms and also advise as to requirements for operable windows at any other

Building locations?

See response to PPI#242 and

Amendment 0008.

RFP

Attachment

H

A101002

Deep

Foundation s

Attachment H Section A101002

Deep Foundations states that the building and first floor slab must be entirely supported by a pile foundation system and that "a foundation system using only pile supported grade beams will not be permitted". Please clarify whether a pile supported grade beam system supporting a structural slab is acceptable, or if discrete pile caps are required at all pile locations, with grade beams spanning between pile caps.

The foundation system using pile caps and grade beams must be provided. Therefore, discrete pile caps are required at all pile locations, with grade beams spanning between pile caps. A pile supported grade beam system supporting a structural slab is not acceptable.

249 RFP Part 3

Chapter

3.1.2.13

AICUZ

Per RFP Part 3 Chapter 3.1.2.13

AICUZ, the project site is in a 65-

70db Day-night average Sound Level

(DNL). Additionally, RFP ESR

B202001 Windows says provide a minimum of 30% window to wall ratio for each space on an exterior wall. Per UFC 3-101-01 Table 3-1 the composite isolation of building facade and roof is OITC 35 & STC

42. Please confirm that the RFP requirement is to provide high-rated

OITC and STC window or storefront assemblies to meet the AICUZ and

UFC 3-101-01 requirements.

The requirements in UFC 3-

101-01, Table 3-1 must be met due to the facility being located in an AICUZ

250 RFP Part 3

Chapter

3.1.2.13

AICUZ

and

UFC 3-

101-01

Table 3-1)

Please confirm that the RFP (UFC 3-

101-01 Table 3-1) requirement is to provide high-rated OITC and STC window or storefront assemblies to meet the AICUZ and UFC 3-101-01 requirements. These requirements will lead to custom order windows which will likely lead to higher costs and substantially longer lead times.

The requirements in UFC 3-

101-01, Table 3-1 must be met due to the facility being located in an AICUZ

251 RFP Part 3 Chapter 5

Room

Requireme nts

The Part 3 Chapter 5 Room requirements for 110 Laundry and

E10 requirements do not list the type of washer of dryer.

Please confirm the count of washers and dryers is 1 per every 12 residents per FC 4-721-10N 5-3.2.

Also please confirm the washer and dryer will be standard-duty commercial-grade to price the infrastructure supporting them.

See Part 6 (Document D-1)

RFP

Attachment

H

A101002

In addition to the vibration monitoring and mitigation requirements identified in RFP

Section A101002, are there any noise, operational, or work-hour restrictions that could limit driven pile installation at the project site?

See Part 2; Div 01 Specs

(established work hours)

Amend

0006 vs

Amendment 0006, Pre-Proposal

Inquiry Response No. 13, states that the Government will consider alternative solutions that align with

Response to clarify PPI #13.

Regarding example 1, that not only should the Exterior

Factor 5, including “load-bearing studs in panelized or volumetric systems,” in lieu of the prescribed

CMU or cast-in-place concrete backup walls, provided the project conforms to FC 4-721-10.

Amendment 0008 revises Part 3A, Section B201001, Exterior

Enclosure, to require exterior closure consisting of “a combination of brick masonry, concrete unit masonry, or non-structural / architectural precast concrete” to match installation standards referenced in Part 3, Section 4.3 Exterior Character.

Amendment 0008 PPI Response No.

28 also states that “Non-structural precast concrete is allowed.” These responses appear to create a conflict or potential change in allowable design solutions. Amendment 0006 appears to allow alternative industrialized construction approaches with load-bearing wall systems where the proposed solution complies with FC 4-721-10 and maintains the required performance, while Amendment 0008 appears to limit precast concrete exterior wall elements to non-structural architectural precast only. Please clarify whether load-bearing precast concrete exterior wall panels are permitted as part of the proposed design solution where the complete exterior enclosure complies with the

BEAP, FC 4-721-10, applicable

UFCs, structural code requirements, and the RFP’s performance requirements.

Enclosure comply with FC 4-

721-10 and maintain the required performance, but also match installation standards referenced in Part 3, Section

4.3 Exterior Character.

Amend

Based on the volume of PPI responses affecting design and pricing efforts we request an extension of 3 weeks to adjust design, proposal, and pricing solutions.

Phase II proposal due date remains unchanged.

(End of Summary Changes)