Solicitation N4008526R0033 Amendment 0002.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

Created On:

22 Jul 2026, 17:46 PM Greenwich Mean Time

J 1 17

0002 22 Jul 2026 See Continuation Sheet N40085

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE, NORFOLK VA 23511-0395

NORFOLK, VA 23511-0395

UNITED STATES

Krystal Goodman, Email: krystal.s.goodman2.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 757- 341-1657

SCD: PAS:

N4008526R0033

25 Jun 2026

See Section G - Contract Administration Data

N4008526R0033 Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Beaufort and Laurel Bay Base Operation Support

This amendment is issued to:

-Extend the submission deadline to August 5, 2026.

-Incorporate DFARS clause to Section I and DFARS provisions to Section K.

-Reference Annex 1503020 Pest Control and remove reference to Annex 1503060 Pavement Clearance in Section M.

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 28 Jul 2026 05 Aug 2026

N4008526R00330002

Section I - Contract Clauses

Additional Information/Notes

The following clauses were added:

DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

252.240-7007 Prohibitions Relating to Chinese Military Companies. (DEVIATION 2026-O0025) Jun 2026 Deviation 2026-O0025 Jun 2026

Section K - Representations, Certification, & Other Statements

The following clauses were added:

DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

252.240-7995 Prohibition on Contract Awards with Entities That Contract with Lobbyists for Chinese Military Companies--Representation.

(DEVIATION 2026-O0025)

Jun 2026 Deviation 2026-O0025 Jun 2026

252.240-7996 Prohibition on Contract Awards to Chinese Military Companies-- Representation. (DEVIATION 2026-O0025) Jun 2026 Deviation 2026-O0025 Jun 2026

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

BASIS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis for Award

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value--the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.202(a)(2)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a Deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the Deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-price factors will result in an overall rating of Unacceptable for the non-price factors, unless corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a Significant Weakness or multiple Weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board's assessment of the identified Weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the Weakness (s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

M.2 Evaluation Factors for Award

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 - Management Approach

Factor 2 - Corporate Experience

Factor 3 - Safety

Factor 4 - Past Performance

Note: The distinction between experience and past performance is that corporate experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that is comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant contracts, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. All technical factors are of equal importance to each other and when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating when combined are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors' non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal's superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Proposals will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness as follows:

(1) . All pricing information required by the solicitation has been provided, all mathematic Completeness computations are correct and the pricing application understood, prices are on an "all or none" basis, and failure to submit a price on an item or a number of items may cause this factor and the entire offer to be determined unacceptable.

(2) . Price analysis comparisons indicate the offered price to be fair and reasonable, balanced Reasonableness across option years, and balanced amongst all Recurring and Non-recurring Exhibit Line Items.

Unreasonable, unbalanced or incomplete pricing may cause a proposal to be determined unacceptable.

(b) Non-Price Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Management Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit a narrative response that clearly demonstrates its understanding of and approach to accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement. Each of the topics below shall be included in the narrative and tabbed in the non-price proposal and discussed separately. Your narrative for this Factor shall be no more than 25 single-sided pages.

a. Phase-In Transition Plan. The phase-in transition period is 90 days as per F.2 of the RFP. Describe what you will do to "start-up" performance in accordance with the contract requirements.

1. Include a schedule of phase-in key events that starts on the first day of the transition period and goes to the 90th day. In addition to the key events, your schedule shall address the Section F Deliverables submission requirements.

2. Provide a phase-in transition plan narrative that includes, but is not limited to:

a. The roles and responsibilities of personnel involved in the phase-in period;

b. Your plan to complete personnel/staffing actions; and

c. Your plan to have on hand adequate equipment/material to begin services on the start date of the period of performance.

NOTE: The incumbent contractor shall address the required elements of the Phase-in Transition Plan tailored to how they will successfully continue services while meeting new contract requirements.

b. Workforce Management. For each of the following, clearly:

1. Describe how you will staff the organization including lines of management authority, supervision, span of control and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and subcontractors. Also, describe the controls and/or processes in place to ensure continuity of services that addresses staff and technician training; staff recruitment, retention and replacement; staffing contingencies during times of surge work to provide service requirements noted in Annex 1502000 Facility Investment, Annex , and 1503020 Pest Control 1700000 BSVE in this solicitation. The narrative shall include, at a minimum, Project Manager, Quality Manager, Site Safety and Health Officer, and on-site supervisor(s) and to whom they will report directly to for this contract. Your proposal shall be compliant with and demonstrate an understanding of the reporting and dual-hatted personnel restrictions in Section C, Annex 0200000, Management and Administration Spec Item 2.7.1 Key Personnel and its Sub-annexes 2.7.1.1 through 2.7.1.6.

2. Describe the controls and/or processes you will have in place to ensure your ability to provide the necessary materials (in accordance with the solicitation; Annex 0200000 Management and Administration, Spec Item 2.5 Contractor Furnished Items; Annex 1502000 Facility Investment, Spec Item 2.3.1 Workmanship and Material Standards; Annex 1602000 Electrical, Spec Item 2.3.1 Work Coordination; and Annex 1700000 BSVE, Spec Item 2.3.3.5 Replacement Material, Parts, and Equipment), complete and ready for use, at the start of the contract period. Your proposal shall demonstrate a reasonable plan for having equipment to perform the contract requirements in place to commence work on the performance start date.

3. Describe your plan to recruit and maintain a qualified workforce.

4. Describe your methodology for managing and performing the large-scale IMP and PM programs required by and compliant with Annex 1502000 Facility Investment, Annex 1503020 Pest Control, Annex 1602000 Electrical, and 1700000 BSVE. The narrative shall address, at a minimum, your detailed plan for data workflow and management as required in Section C, Annex 0200000, Spec Items 2.6.8 and Spec Item 2.6.9, it's sub-Spec Items, and any referenced Section J Attachments.

5. Describe your plan to manage competing priorities, including surges, for non-recurring task orders at various locations in this contract, without adversely affecting recurring work.

6. Describe the work to be performed as the prime contractor (self-performed) as well as work to be performed by each subcontractor proposed. The work to be performed, the subcontractors to be utilized, and their roles, shall be clearly identified. Offerors are advised they will be responsible for being compliant with

FAR 52.219-14, Limitation on Subcontracting, during contract performance. NOTE: The Offerors shall clearly state in their narrative if they plan to self-perform 100% of the work as the prime.

c. Quality Management. Provide a summary of your "Quality Management System" (QMS). Your summary shall address:

1. The practices and resources you will use to ensure full compliance with all Performance Objectives and Performance Standards as described in Section C, Annex 0200000 - Management and Administration).

2. Your plan to implement, audit, surveil, and inspect work performance and your strategy for taking corrective action when necessary.

3. Specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract to ensure successful performance for all deliverables of this contract.

4. Methods to be used to document, measure, control, and improve the quality management processes.

5. Your plan for training employees in the quality management processes.

6. The processes that will be used to ensure consistent satisfactory performance of subcontractors.

7. A description of their roles and responsibilities of the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program.

8. A quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and lines of authority for all quality management personnel.

9. For Offerors that are joint ventures and/or teams with offices in a variety of locations, describe how the QC effort will be implemented across the various team offices. Describe from which office the QC program will be managed/coordinated and the plan/methods to ensure effective QC and communication between offices.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Management Approach factor shall be evaluated based upon the following criteria. The proposal provides a feasible management approach with the capability to, at least, meet solicitation performance objectives and standards.

a. Phase-In Transition Plan: The Government will evaluate the feasibility of the Offeror's Phase-In Transition Plan as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The following will be evaluated to determine feasibility:

1. your schedule of key events that is compliant with the solicitation requirements and includes Section F Deliverables submission requirements,

2. a. the roles and responsibilities of personnel involved in the phase-in period,

b. your plan to complete personnel/staffing actions,

c. your plan for having equipment/material to begin services on the start date of the period of performance.

Note: The evaluation of the incumbent contractor's Phase-in Transition Plan shall be focused on how they will successfully continue services while meeting new contract requirements.

Failure to address any of the information requested in Solicitation Submittal requirements, paragraph a may .result in a lower rating

b. Workforce Management. The Government will evaluate the feasibility of the Offeror's workforce management narrative as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The following will be evaluated to determine feasibility:

1. Your plan to staff the organization including lines of management authority, supervision, span of control and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and subcontractors. The controls and /or processes you will put in place to ensure continuity of services that addresses staff and technician training;

staff recruitment, retention and replacement; staffing contingencies during times of surge work to provide service requirements noted in Annex 1502000 Facility Investment, Annex 1503020 Pest Control, and 1700000 BSVE in this solicitation. Your proposal's compliant with and demonstrate an understanding of the reporting and dual-hatted personnel restrictions in Section C, Annex 0200000, Management and Administration Spec Item

2.7.1 Key Personnel and its Sub-annexes 2.7.1.1 through 2.7.1.6.

2. Your controls and/or processes you will put in place to ensure your ability to provide the necessary materials (in accordance with the solicitation; Annex 0200000 Management and Administration, Spec Item 2.5 Contractor Furnished Items; Annex 1502000 Facility Investment, Spec Item 2.3.1 Workmanship and Material Standards; Annex 1602000 Electrical, Spec Item 2.3.1 Work Coordination; and Annex 1700000 BSVE, Spec Item 2.3.3.5 Replacement Material, Parts, and Equipment), complete and ready for use, at the start of the contract period. Your reasonable plan for having equipment to perform the contract requirements in place to commence work on the performance start date.

3. Your plan to recruit and maintain a qualified workforce.

4. Your methodology for managing and performing the large-scale IMP and PM programs required by and compliant with Annex 1502000 Facility Investment, 1503020 Pest Control, Annex 1602000 Electrical, and 1700000 BSVE. The narrative shall address, at a minimum, your detailed plan for data workflow and management as required in Section C, Annex 0200000, Spec Items 2.6.8 and Spec Item 2.6.9, it's sub-Spec Items, and any referenced Section J Attachments.

5. your plan to manage competing priorities, including surges, at various locations in this contract.

6. the work to be performed as the prime contractor (self-performed) as well as work to be performed by each subcontractor proposed.

Failure to address any of the information requested in Solicitation Submittal requirements, paragraph b may . result in a lower rating

c. The Government will evaluate the feasibility of the Offeror's "Quality Quality Management.

Management System" (QMS) summary, a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The following will be evaluated to determine feasibility:

1. the practices and resources you will use to ensure full compliance with all Performance Objectives and Performance Standards as described in Section C, Annex 0200000 - Management and Administration.

2. your plan to implement, audit, surveil, and inspect work performance and your strategy for taking corrective action when necessary.

3. your specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract to ensure successful performance for all deliverables of this contract.

4. your plan for training employees in the quality management processes.

5. the processes that will be used to ensure consistent satisfactory performance of subcontractors.

6. methods to be used to document, measure, control, and improve the quality management processes.

7. your description of their roles and responsibilities of the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program.

8. a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and lines of authority for all quality management personnel.

9. for Offerors that are joint ventures and/or teams with offices in a variety of locations, describe how the QC effort will be implemented across the various team offices. Describe from which office the QC program will be managed/coordinated and the plan/methods to ensure effective QC and communication between offices.

Failure to address any of the information requested in Solicitation Submittal requirements, paragraph b may . result in a lower rating

A Quality Management System that fails to demonstrate a sufficient response to quality controls may result in a .lower rating

An Offeror that receives a CPARS Overall Quality Rating of Very Good or better, or an average rating of Very Good or better in "Section 1. Quality" in its Past Performance Questionnaire, for the contract submitted under Factor 2, Corporate Experience, . may be rated higher

A Quality Management System demonstrates an approach to quickly and successfully correct inadequacies in quality of performance may result in a higher rating.

(2) Factor 2, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information. Submit a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of five (5) contracts that best demonstrate the relevant prime contractor experience of the Offeror and/or the Offeror's corporate affiliate(s) that are similar in Size and Scope /Complexity to the work requirements as defined below. Experience of the Offeror or its corporate affiliate(s) performed as a subcontractor will not be considered. Contracts submitted in excess of the maximum will not be considered. Additionally, the Government will consider only the first five contracts if more are submitted.

For the purposes of this evaluation, a relevant contract is further defined as follows:

Size: A contract with a yearly value of at least $5,000,000 for recurring services.

In addition to meeting the Size, each contract submitted does not require demonstrated Scope/Complexity:

experience with all of the following, but, collectively they shall demonstrate experience with labor, supervision, management, tools, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, incidental engineering, and other items necessary to provide services as described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for ALL of the following: Facility Investment (Sub-Annex 1502000), Pest Control (Sub-Annex 1503020), Electrical (Sub- Annex 1602000), and Base Support Vehicle and Equipment (BSVE) (Annex 1700000).

The attached Corporate Experience Data Sheet (Attachment J-0200000-19) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit contract information. Offerors are only permitted to submit one contract per Corporate Experience Data Sheet. If the Offeror submits more than one contract on one Corporate Experience Data Sheet, the contract will be considered Not Relevant. The Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each Corporate Experience Data Sheet shall not exceed three (3) single-sided pages. If more than three (3) single-sided pages are submitted, the Government will only consider the first three (3) single-sided pages.

Contracts submitted for the Offeror shall be ongoing (having been performed for a period of at least one year from the date of issuance of this solicitation) or completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this solicitation. Contracts with periods of performance beyond one year shall be clearly defined as multi-year contracts or as base contracts with option periods. If the contract has option periods, state which contract period is in progress (e.g. base, 1st option, etc.). If the Corporate Experience Data Sheet does not clearly demonstrate that the contract meets the above requirements, the Government may deem the contract Not Relevant.

For all submitted contracts, the description of the contract shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the requirements of this RFP as it relates to Size and Scope/Complexity, as defined above, or the Government may consider the contract Not Relevant. If an Offeror intends to submit recurring work completed/issued off an Indefinite Quantity/Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) contract as a qualifying contract, the Offeror is limited to submitting the IDIQ contract itself. The Government will not consider or evaluate any task orders whether submitted individually or collectively.

In accordance with 13 CFR 125.2(g), Offerors may utilize the prime contractor experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor(s) to demonstrate experience under this evaluation factor if that Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement as defined above. In order to utilize the experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor(s), the offeror must specifically identify the proposed small business first tier contractor(s) in its proposal in accordance with this Factor. The Offeror or its small business first-tier subcontractor, shall have been the prime contractor on all submitted contracts. The Offeror is not permitted to use the experience of a large business subcontractor or large business corporate affiliate in place of its own experience if the Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement as defined above.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant experience should be submitted for contracts completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have shared experience, contracts may be submitted for each JV member. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all JV members may be rated lower (except for offerors covered by Mentor- Protege Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration or pursuant to 13 CFR 125.2(g)). If the Offeror is submitting experience for individual JV partners in which the company was a partner in a different JV entity, the Offeror must specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted contract was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and demonstrate that the work meets the Size and Scope /Complexity as defined above, or the contract will be considered Not Relevant. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) contracts combined.

Offerors proposing as Mentor-Protege Joint Ventures shall provide a copy of the letter from SBA approving their Mentor-Protege Agreement and submit their proposal in accordance with SBA regulations for approved Mentor-Protege agreements. Failure to provide a copy of the SBA approval letter will result in a Deficiency.

Offerors that are not submitting as a JV may submit a contract where it performed as a JV with another entity but must clearly demonstrate how it works on that contract met Size and Scope/Complexity, as defined above, or the contract will be considered Not Relevant.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience of corporate affiliates (affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1449)) or first-tier small business sub-contractors (pursuant to 13 CFR 125.2(g):

The Offeror shall submit a signed copy of the partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment. The copy shall be signed by both the Offeror and the corporate affiliate or first-tier small business sub-contractor.

- The proposal shall include a narrative that clearly demonstrates that the corporate affiliates or first-tier small business sub-contractors will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. The following shall be included in the narrative:

- The named and specific technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment) committed to the performance of this contract and that those resources will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/areas of this contract.

- A description of the specific roles of the corporate affiliates or first-tier small business sub-contractors in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract.

Note: Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.

Failure to submit this information may result in a lower rating.

The Government will not consider any contract submitted for this Factor 2 if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror's relevant corporate experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP as defined above. The minimum standard for this Factor has been met when the Offeror has demonstrated adequate experience by submitting at least one relevant contract of similar Size and Scope/Complexity, as defined above, on which the Offeror or its corporate affiliate or first-tier small business sub-contractors (pursuant to 13 CFR 125.2(g)) was the prime contractor. At least one relevant contract shall also meet the compliance requirements of this Factor as defined above.

A Deficiency will be assigned to any Offeror that does not meet the minimum requirements of at least one (1) relevant contract as defined above and as such will receive a rating of UNACCEPTABLE. An Offeror with an UNACCEPTABLE rating in any Factor will not be eligible for award.

The degree to which the offeror demonstrates relevant corporate experience as related to this solicitation will be evaluated:

(i) Proposals that do not aggregately demonstrate relevant experience in sub-annexes: Facility Investment (Sub-Annex 1502000), Pest Control (Sub-Annex 1503020), Electrical (Sub-Annex 1602000), and Base Support Vehicle and Equipment (BSVE) (Annex 1700000), as related to this solicitation .will result in a Deficiency

(ii) Contracts for which an Offeror successfully demonstrates relevant corporate experience in performing and managing a large contract with recurring and non-recurring services totaling $10M or greater annually may be

.rated higher

(iii) Any single contract that successfully demonstrates relevant corporate experience in Facility Investment (Sub-Annex 1502000), Pest Control (Sub-Annex 1503020), Electrical (Sub-Annex 1602000), and Base Support Vehicle and Equipment (BSVE) (Annex 1700000), as related to this solicitation . may be rated higher

(iv) Offerors that demonstrate experience without relying on corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister subsidiaries, sister companies, or parent companies) or first-tier small business subcontractors may be rated higher.

(v) Contracts completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates or first-tier small business sub-contractors in any capacity other than as prime contractor .will not be considered relevant

(vi) Contracts completed by a proposed subcontractor, other than a first-tier small business subcontractor pursuant to13 CFR 125.2(g), . will not be considered relevant

(vii) Contracts completed by the offeror's corporate affiliates or first-tier small business sub-contractors for which a properly signed copy of the partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and/or a narrative addressing all required elements has not been provided will not be considered relevant.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY) as well as a safety narrative, as described further below.

, the Offeror shall submit separate DART and TCR rates for the specified five For a partnership or joint venture

(5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Offerors that fail to submit DART rates and TCR for each business entity that is part of the partnership /joint venture/teaming agreement will be assigned a Deficiency and will be rated Unacceptable.

Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000 and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

DART RATE = Number of DART Incidents x 200.000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked

TCR RATE = Number of TCR Incidents x 200.000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

3. Technical Approach to Safety: The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to seven (7) single-sided pages and shall address the following:

a. Describe the Offeror's approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. A description of the roles and responsibilities of the site safety and health officer and any other key personnel responsible for the safety management system.

c. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

d. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror's own in-house workforce).

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC's Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five complete calendar years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a Deficiency.

b. Consistent Low Risk or Very Low Risk DART rates may be considered a Strength.

c. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) may be considered a Strength.

d. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a Weakness or Significant Weakness (i.e., MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

e. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0

Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99

Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99

High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0

Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

2. TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five complete calendar years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the Offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a Deficiency.

b. Consistent Low Risk or Very Low Risk TCR rates may be considered a Strength.

c. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) may be considered a Strength.

d. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a Weakness or Significant Weakness (i.e., MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

e. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49

Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49

Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49

High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99

Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

3. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes of the roles and responsibilities of the site safety and health officer and any other key personnel responsible for the safety management system.

c. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor's safety performance in their selection process.

d. Describes a logical management plan to hold both themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

e. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to seven (7) single-sided pages. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

f. A Technical Approach to Safety narrative, missing in its entirety will result in a Deficiency.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC's Contractor Incident Reporting

System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

For contracts submitted for Factor 2, Corporate Experience:

a. IF CPARS EVALUATION ARE AVAILABLE, THEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. The Offeror shall submit all CPARS evaluations available for that contract, not just the most recent.

b. IF THERE ARE NOT CPARS EVALUATIONS, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in this solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each Factor 2 contract. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a contract(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective contract(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Krystal Goodman, via email at prior to proposal closing krystal.s.goodman2.civ@us.navy.mil date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN CPARS EVALATIONS ARE AVAILABLE.

The Offeror may include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years (from the date of issuance of the solicitation) such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to:

- Past performance information provided by the Offeror, as solicited;

- Past performance information obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition;

- Past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for the Offeror's team members (e.g., partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the proposal;

- Inquiries of owner representative(s);

- Interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and/or Fee Determining Officials;

- Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS);

- Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS); and

- Any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment J-0200000-20.

IMPORTANT: It is the responsibility of the Offeror to provide accurate points of contact for each identified contract and current telephone numbers and/or email addresses. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or invalid phone number could result in a firm being considered less qualified.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government's inability to contact any of the Offeror's references or the references' unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government's evaluation of this factor.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on contracts submitted under Factor 2, Corporate Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Such explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on the quality of performance on the relevant contracts submitted under Factor 2, Corporate Experience, and past performance on other contracts currently documented in known sources.

The quality of performance is informed by the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained for any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.)