Solicitation - N4008525R2638.pdf

(See ).

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR

INFORMATION CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER

CODE

6. PROJECT NUMBER

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

4. CONTRACT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY

11. The contractor shall begin performance within

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and

b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

is, is not required.

local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.

calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

INVITATION FOR BID

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

Created On:

22 Dec 2025, 19:15 PM Greenwich Mean Time

N4008525R2638 22 Dec 2025 1 65

1810892

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE, NORFOLK VA

23511-0395

NORFOLK, VA 23511-0395

UNITED STATES

Kristy GERREK, Email: kristy.l.gerrek.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 757-341-0089

N40085

Kristy GERREK 757-341-0089

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date)

Project Title: DESIGN-BUILD P1678 NATO JFCNF PHASE II INTERIM MODULAR FACILITY, NSA NORFOLK, VA Project Location: NSA NORFOLK, VA

SOLICITATION NO: N4008525R2638

THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) IS FOR PHASE ONE FACTORS 1-4 ONLY. OFFERORS WHO HAVE BEEN SELECTED FOR PHASE TWO WILL BE NOTIFIED

DIRECTLY TO SUBMIT FACTORS 5-6 AND PRICE PROPOSAL.

THIS ACQUISITION IS BEING SOLICITED ON AN UNRESTRICTED BASIS WITH FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.

ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS SOLICITATION SHALL BE DIRECTED VIA EMAIL TO KRISTY GERREK AT KRISTY.L.GERREK.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL.

15 640

FAR 52.211-10

1 02:00 PM

05 Feb 2026

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement by the Government in writing within stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT

NUMBER

DATE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

26. ADMINISTERED BY

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print)

31c. DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022) BACK

31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES

CODE AT

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

10 U.S.C. 3204(a) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) ( )

20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

DESIGN-BUILD P1678 NATO JFCNF PHASE II INTERIM MODULAR FACILITY, NSA NORFOLK, VA

Defense Priorities Allocation System (DPAS) Priority Rating: DO-C2 Date: 22 Dec 2025

N4008525R2638

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule

Additional Information/Notes

Item Supplies/Service Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

BASE PRICE: Total Price for line items 0001A-0001C for the entire work for P1678 NATO JFCNF Phase II Interim Modular Facility in accordance with the RFP, complete, but excluding work provided in another Priced line Item.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Project

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 1 - Unit Price for handling, stockpiling, sampling, analysis, treatment and disposal of impacted non-hazardous contaminated soil media (including, but not limited to, PFAS, petroleum, VOC's and metals) at a RCRA D permitted licensed facility as necessary, complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another line item.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1,000 Project

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 2 - Unit Price for undercut and temporary stockpiling of geotechnically unsuitable subgrade soils and replacement with imported structural fill material, aggregate base course or with #57 crushed stone, complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another Line Item.

Disposal of impacted surplus soil media will be covered under Line Item 0001C & 0002.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

2,500 Project

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 3 - Unit Price for demolition, excavation and disposal of buried concrete and debris greater than 1/2 cubic yard in size, encountered within planned excavation limits and not identified in the Contract Documents, complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another line item.

(Note: Pieces of buried concrete and debris encountered within the planned excavation limits smaller

750 Project than 1/2 cubic yard in size shall be considered to be incidental to the work).

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 4 - LUMP SUM PRICE:

FF&E - General Package. Price for providing work in connection with labor, material, equipment, transportation and supervision required for the Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E), complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another Priced line item.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Project

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 5 - LUMP SUM PRICE:

Price for providing Audio Visual System (A/V) Equipment. Price for equipment, testing, and associated training in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another Priced line item. The equipment includes, but is not limited to, items such as flat panel monitors, projectors, wall input boxes, touch screens, push button control panels, microphones, speakers and the communication cabling connecting these devices together.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Project

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 6 - LUMP SUM PRICE:

Price for providing Electronic Security System (ESS). Price for equipment, testing, and associated training in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another Priced line item. Include the price for supporting permanent infrastructure under the Base Price.

Interior supporting infrastructure includes items such as conduit, junction boxes, electronic door strikes, door hardware, mounting hardware, and power connections.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Project

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 7 - Asbestos Removal: Total Price for line items 0008A-0008C.

1 Project

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

Option Line Item

Option Item No. 8 - Unit Price for handling, stockpiling, sampling, analysis, water treatment and disposal of hazardous contaminated soil media that requires transport and disposal at a RCRA C permitted licensed facility, complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work provided in another line item.

Centralized Unique Program Identification (CUPID): 000 Program Code: C20 Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1,000 Project

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 SITE VISIT

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

4.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

6. ATTACHMENTS: MAY BE LOCATED ON CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES AND PIEE UNDER ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A - Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log Template

Attachment B - PIEE Vendor Access Instructions

Attachment C - Construction and Design Experience Project Data Sheet

Attachment D - Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment E - Historical Small Business Utilization (provided with Phase II)

Attachment F - Small Business Participation Commitment Document (provided with Phase II)

Attachment G - Individual Small Business Subcontracting Plan (provided with Phase II)

Attachment H - JFCN IMF DB RFP Volume 1 & 2 (provided with Phase II)

Attachment I - P1678 NATO Price Proposal Form (provided with Phase II)

Attachment J - SECNAV 5212 (provided with Phase II)

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This acquisition is being solicited on an unrestricted basis, with Full and Open Competition.

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 236220 and the size standard is $45,000,000.

1.1.3 In accordance with DFARS 236.204(iii), the magnitude of construction for this project is between $100,000,000 to $250,000,000.

1.1.4 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal and will be advertised utilizing FAR Part 36.3, Two Phase Design Build Selection Procedures and FAR Part 15 - Contracting by Negotiations resulting in a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for construction services.

This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source whose performance provides the best value to the Government.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

Description of Work:

This design-build project provides needed administration and operational spaces for NATO Joint Force Command Norfolk's Facilities (JFCNF) to continue mission capabilities. This project will provide a permanent modular constructed facility and must meet the requirements of permanent construction as outlined in the applicable codes and standards.

Support elements for the new JFCNF building includes site preparations for clearing and earthwork, excavation, cut and gill, grading, paving, and storm water improvements. The current site is vacant, and all utilities will need to be brought to the site for tie-in to the new facility.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior 2.

to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value--the proposal most advantageous to the Government, cost /price and other factors considered.

2.2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. This procurement will utilize two-phase design-build selection procedures as prescribed in FAR Subpart 36.3, 2.

where non-price Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase I, and non-price Factors 5-6 and price will be evaluated in Phase II.

Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II, unless corrected through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider non-price Factors 2-6 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and 6) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). Subfactors 2a, 2b, and 2c are of equal importance. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance /performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

2. 5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-cost/price factors will result in an overall rating of "Unacceptable" for the non-cost/price factors, unless corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board's assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Phase I:

Factor 1 - Technical Approach

Factor 2 - Experience

Subfactor 2a - General Construction Experience

Subfactor 2b - Permanent Modular Construction (PMC) Experience

Subfactor 2c - Design Experience

Factor 3 - Past Performance

Factor 4 - Safety

Phase II:

Factor 5 - Technical Solution

Factor 6 - Small Business Utilization and Participation

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. As stated in the solicitation for this two-phase design-build procurement, Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 5-6 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, it will not be considered for Phase II, unless deficiencies in proposal are corrected through discussions. In making the best value award decisions after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price.

The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and 6) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation /performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). Subfactors 2a, 2b, and 2c are of equal importance. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

After evaluating Phase I proposals, the source selection authority shall select the most highly qualified offerors and request that only those offerors submit Phase II proposals. In accordance with FAR 36.303-1(a)(4), the solicitation shall state that a maximum of five (5) offerors will be selected to submit Phase II proposals unless the contracting officer determines that a number greater than five (5) is in the Government's best interest.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors' non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal's superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Price Proposal (Phase II):

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy via PIEE of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below. The Price and Non-price proposals shall be submitted in separate files and submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF). In addition, non- price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered, likewise, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.

All submissions shall include the following:

1. Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide a cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, Offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address with its proposal.

2. Completed Price Proposal Form. The Offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all line items. Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442.

3. Bid Bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

4. SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00 45 00 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal. Please also submit the representation and certification for 52.209-13 - Violation of Arms Control Treaties or Agreements- Certification separately. It is not included in the annual representations and certifications in the System for Award Management.

5. FAPIIS. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete, as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

6. VETS-4212 registration. Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS-4212) for the 2024 /2025 filing cycle, if the Offeror is required to submit.. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

7. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Reference FAR 52.219-9 ALT II and DFARS 252.219-7003).

In accordance with FAR 19.7, all other than small businesses shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) utilizing the template provided as Attachment G. Acceptability of the SBSP will be considered a responsibility matter.

The SBSP will not be evaluated or rated by the SSEB, but reviewed by a Small Business Professional/Authorized Representative and the Contracting Officer for acceptability. The SBSP shall be negotiated and/or accepted within the time specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure to negotiate an acceptable subcontracting plan within the time limit prescribed by the Contracting Officer will render the Offeror ineligible for award of the contract. The SBSP will be incorporated into the resulting contract.

NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent, challenging, small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition consistent with efficient and effective performance of the contract. These targets are based on a percentage of total planned subcontract dollars.

Small Business (SB) 40%

Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 5%

HUBZone SB 3%

Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) 9%

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 5%

The SBSP shall be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Utilization and Participation factor. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c)(i), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, those small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in the SBSP.

Please note that SBSP goals and the participation rates provided in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) WILL NOT be the same. The participation rates within the SBPCD are provided as percentages of the total contract value; subcontract plan goals are provided as a percentage of planned subcontracting dollars. While the percentages will differ, the types of products/services identified in the SBSP, should be the same as those products/services identified in the SBPCD. Likewise, the planned small business subcontract dollars in the SBSP will be equal to (or in some cases greater than) the extent of small business participation identified in the SBPCD.

8. Bank Reference. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror's firm has a line of credit, provide information on how many figures the offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures - exact line of credit is not required).

9. Financial Statements. The Offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

10. Facilities and Equipment. Provide a description of offeror's facilities and equipment.

11. Other Work. Provide a list of offeror's other work presently under contract.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (See Attachment I- Price Proposal Form). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00 21 16 of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Although required to be submitted with offeror's price proposal, Items 3 through 11 above will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information will be utilized by the Government in the responsibility determination and for considering responsiveness to the solicitation requirements.

Non-price Proposal:

All submissions shall include the following:

The Offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy via PIEE of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below. The Price and Non-price proposals shall be submitted in separate files and submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF). In addition, non- price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered, likewise, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.

Offeror shall provide a cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, Offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address with its proposal.

Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated.

For Phase I, offerors shall only submit information for Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Note: If proposing as a Joint Venture (JV), please submit the POC, UEI, and CAGE Code for each JV partner.

Factor 1 - Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

1. Provide a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract. Include a brief description of the role and responsibility of each entity not to exceed (1) one single sided page. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, Experience, that entity must be named in the organizational chart. Please refer to Factor 2 for any limitations on submitting experience of proposed subcontractors.

The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

2. In addition, the offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protege agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment signed by each member of the offeror's team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). Letters of commitment for the Designer of Record shall be addressed from the Designer of Record to the Offeror. The Designer of Record's letter of commitment shall be signed by the Designer of Record's signing authority.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror's technical approach will be used as a means to review the organizational structure and roles and responsibilities proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Factor 2 - Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: This Factor contains 3 Subfactors for which the Offeror must provide information; General Construction Experience, Permanent Modular Construction (PMC) Experience, and Design Experience.

Subfactor 2a: General Construction Experience:

Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for this subfactor that best demonstrate their experience on relevant projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to this RFP.

With the exception of 13 CFR 125.2(g), experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered. Furthermore, the Offeror's experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A final construction cost of $100,000,000 or greater.

Scope: New construction of a two-story or greater commercial, industrial, or institutional building.

Complexity: Relevant projects shall demonstrate design experience requirements as shown below:cumulatively with all

- Deep Foundations piles

- Structural support slabs

- Structures with excessive soil settlement (weak and compressible soils)

Note: While each project must also meet Size and Scope as defined above, the Offeror's proposal shall, cumulatively, demonstrate experience with of the elements listed under "Complexity". All elements do not have to be included under all one project; experience may be demonstrated collectively through all projects submitted meeting size and scope.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly provides the final construction cost and addresses how the project meets the scope/complexity requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall have been completed within the from the date of issuance of past ten (10) years this RFP. Projects which are not complete as of the date of issuance of this RFP will be considered "Not Relevant".

Additionally, projects completed prior to ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this RFP will be considered "Not Relevant."

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project. The submission of a multiple award and/or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contract as a whole will be considered Not Relevant.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider submissions via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.

Subfactor 2b: Permanent Modular Construction (PMC) Experience:

Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for this subfactor that best demonstrate their experience on relevant projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to this RFP.

Experience of a teaming partner specializing in modular construction may be utilized to demonstrate experience in this subfactor for PMC. With the exception of 13 CFR 125.2(g), other subcontractor experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered in this subfactor. Furthermore, the Offeror's experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A final construction cost of $50,000,000 or greater.

Scope/Complexity: New construction of a two-story or greater commercial, industrial, or institutional Permanent Modular Construction (PMC) building.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly provides the final construction cost and addresses how the project meets the scope/complexity requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall have been completed within the from the date of issuance of past ten (10) years this RFP. Projects which are not complete as of the date of issuance of this RFP will be considered "Not Relevant".

Additionally, projects completed prior to ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this RFP will be considered "Not Relevant."

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project. The submission of a multiple award and/or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contract as a whole will be considered Not Relevant.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider submissions via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.

Subfactor 2c: Design Experience:

Offerors shall clearly state the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designer of Record (DOR) for this contract. Provide the full name of the firm, address, UEI number, and CAGE code. The Offeror shall submit a letter of commitment signed by the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designed of Record (DOR).

Failure to provide a DOR letter of commitment will render the proposal .UNACCEPTABLE

The Offeror may utilize experience of the identified design subcontractor as the Designer of Record in order to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects performed by the proposed design firm as the for this subfactor that best demonstrate their experience on relevant Designer of Record projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to this RFP. The design firm must have been the DOR on all submitted projects.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A final construction cost of $100,000,000 or greater.

Scope: New construction of a two-story or greater commercial, industrial, or institutional building.

Complexity: Relevant projects shall demonstrate design experience requirements as shown below:cumulatively with all

- Deep Foundations piles

- Structural support slabs

- Multi-level Permanent Modular Construction (PMC)

- Structures with excessive soil settlement (weak and compressible soils)

Note: While each project must also meet Size and Scope as defined above, the Offeror's proposal shall, cumulatively, demonstrate experience with of the of the elements listed under "Complexity". All elements do not have to be included all under one project; experience may be demonstrated collectively through all projects submitted meeting size and scope.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly provides the final construction cost and addresses how the project meets the scope/complexity requirements.

Projects submitted as the Designer of Record is defined as having been 100% completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C). The project will be considered Not Relevant if the design completion date is not clearly provided.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project. The submission of a multiple award and/or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contract as a whole will be considered Not Relevant.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider submissions via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.

Note for Factor 2:

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined for each element of the factor. Offerors may submit experience where a member of the JV performed as a JV with another entity, but must clearly demonstrate how its work on that project met size, scope, and complexity as defined above. Likewise, Offerors that are not submitting as a JV may submit a project where it performed as a JV with another entity, but must clearly demonstrate how its work on that project met size, scope, and complexity as defined above. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined for each element of the factor.

For a JV, the offeror shall submit the signed JV agreement. For an 8(a) Mentor-Protege Joint Venture, the offeror shall submit the signed U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Mentor-Protege approval letter and signed JV agreement.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement and clearly describe the role that firm will have in the performance of the contract. If meaningful involvement is not demonstrated, experience of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will not be considered.

In accordance with 13 CFR 125.2(g), small business Offerors may utilize the experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor(s) to demonstrate experience under this capability evaluation if the Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement as defined above. In order to utilize the experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor(s), the offeror must specifically identify the proposed small business first-tier contractor(s) in its capability package in accordance with this notice. The Offeror or, if a small business Offeror, its small business first-tier subcontractor, shall have been the prime contractor on all submitted projects. The Government notes that 13 CFR 125.2(g) is specific to only small business Offerors and named small business first-tier subcontractors. As such, the small business Offeror is not permitted to use the experience of a large business subcontractor or large business corporate affiliate in place of its own if the small business Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement as defined above.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror's demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant general construction, permanent modular construction, and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror's relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review the first five (5) projects for general construction, the first five (5) projects for permanent modular construction and the first five (5) projects for design. Any projects submitted in excess of five (5) for general construction experience, five (5) permanent modular construction experience, and five (5) for design experience will not be considered. An offeror that does not submit a minimum of two (2) relevant projects for each subfactor as defined above will receive a rating of "Unacceptable" and will not be eligible for award.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) and/or modular constructors have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Factor 3 - Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Recent, relevant projects are determined within the requirements for Factor 2 - Experience.

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 (all projects submitted for General Construction, Modular Construction, and Design Experience subfactors). The offeror shall include all completed CPARS evaluations (interim and final) for a project. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2 - Experience.

The Offeror should provide completed PPQ's in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information.

However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Offerors should ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Kristy Gerrek, via email at kristy.l.gerrek.civ@us.navy.mil prior to proposal closing date.

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 - Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Such explanations shall not exceed four (4) pages in total. Information beyond this page limitation will not be considered.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

Sources of Past Performance Information for evaluation for the offeror, the Designer of Record subcontractor (if any), and any PMC subcontractor will be considered. Sources that may be used are as follows:

- Past performance information provided by the offeror, as solicited;

- Past performance information obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition;

and

- Past performance information obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases;

the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment D.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government's inability to contact any of the Offeror's references or the references' unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government's evaluation of this factor.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror, the proposed Designer of Record subcontractor (if any), and proposed PMC subcontractor performed on the projects submitted under Factor 2 - Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in Contractor's performance. In the case of Offerors for which there is no information on past performance, or where past performance information is not available or so sparse that no meaningful assessment can be performed, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably, and will instead receive a "Neutral" rating (See FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). The Government may determine that a "Substantial Confidence" or "Satisfactory Confidence" past performance rating is worth more than a "Neutral Confidence" past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent with stated selection criteria.

The Government will consider the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand.

Factor 4 - Safety:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required.

Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' [CY2021, CY2022, CY2023, CY2024, CY2025] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.

Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job…