N4008525R2507 Amendment 0002.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 23 Sep 2025 07 Oct 2025

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule

The following changes to Limits have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Government Obligation to Order Maximum USD 975,000,000.00 USD +975,000,000.00 Contractor Obligation to Deliver Maximum USD 975,000,000.00 -975,000,000

N4008525R25070002

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

AMENDMENT 0002

The Amendment is issued to incorporate the following:

1. Update Instructions to Offerors section 4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD, Factor 1, Corporate

Experience and Factor 5, Small Business Utilization and Participation (changes denoted in red below).

2. Provide responses to PPIs (additional PPI responses will be forthcoming via Amendment(s)).

3. Extend the proposal due from 23 September 2025 to 07 October 2025 at 1400 EDT. The PPI cutoff date of

09 September 2025 remains unchanged. See updates to Instructions to Offerors section 5.3 PRE-

PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs) (changes denoted in red below).

4. Provide site visit log. The site visit log is attached separately and titled “25R2507 (P1538 Seed Project) Site

Visit Log.”

1. See updates to Instructions to Offerors section 4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD as denoted in red below:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(1) Construction Experience:

From:

Projects submitted for the offeror shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Ongoing projects will not be considered. If the contract completion date is not clearly identified, the

Government may deem the project Not Relevant.

To:

Projects submitted for the offeror shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Ongoing projects will not be considered. If the contract completion date is not clearly identified, the

Government may deem the project Not Relevant.

(2) Design Experience:

Projects submitted for the DOR shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Submitted projects that were not completed within this timeframe will be considered "Not Relevant". For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design

Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C). The project will be considered "Not Relevant" if the design completion date is not clearly provided.

Projects submitted for the DOR shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Submitted projects that were not completed within this timeframe will be considered "Not Relevant". For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design

Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C). The project will be considered "Not Relevant" if the design completion date is not clearly provided.

(5) Factor 5, Small Business Utilization and Participation:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1. All offerors (large, non-profits, AND small businesses) shall use Attachment E (Historical Small Business

Utilization) to demonstrate their historical utilization of SBs. Each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate

Experience, shall be included on Attachment E. Failure to include each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate

Experience, on Attachment E, or the failure to fully complete Attachment E for each project may result in a deficiency. Only complete Attachment E. Information provided in a different format and/or on a form created by the offeror will not be evaluated. Attachments or addendums to Attachment E will not be evaluated. Offerors are permitted to expand portions of the form, as needed, to provide sufficient response. Instructions regarding how to complete Attachment E are included at the beginning of the attachment.

1. All offerors (large, non-profits, AND small businesses) shall use Attachment E (Historical Small Business

Utilization) to demonstrate their historical utilization of SBs. Each Construction Experience project submitted under

Factor 1, Corporate Experience, shall be included on Attachment E. Failure to include each Construction Experience project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, on Attachment E, or the failure to fully complete

Attachment E for each Construction Experience project may result in a deficiency. Only complete Attachment E.

Information provided in a different format and/or on a form created by the offeror will not be evaluated.

Attachments or addendums to Attachment E will not be evaluated. Offerors are permitted to expand portions of the form, as needed, to provide sufficient response. Instructions regarding how to complete Attachment E are included at the beginning of the attachment.

2. PPI Responses:

Date

Submitted

Reference

Question Government Response

Page Section Para.

08/18/25 8 00 21 00 Subcontracting Plan: Please confirm that the values/percentages and the commitments to subcontract in the subcontracting plan relate to the seed task order, not the basic MACC.

The Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) relates to the basic MACC as a whole, not to the seed Task

Order.

08/18/25 15 00 21 00 5(i)(2) Factor 5: This factor reference the total "contract" value vs the "task order" value. Please confirm that

Factor 5 values/percentages and firm subcontracting commitments relate to the task order, not the basic MACC.

Factor 5 values/percentages and firm subcontracting commitments relate to the basic

MACC as a whole, not to the seed Task Order.

08/18/25 8 (1)

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements

The RFP requests FAPIIS

Certification in the Price Proposal, but that website is no longer active and has been replaced with the

Responsibility/Qualification section of SAM.gov. Please confirm that Offerors should include the

Responsibility/Qualification section of SAM.gov in the Price

Proposal.

Confirmed. Offerors should include the

Responsibility/Qualification section of SAM.gov in the

Price Proposal.

08/18/25 15 Factor 5 Factor 5 - Small Business

Participation and Utilization under item 1 states, "Each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, shall be included on Attachment E."

Typically such subcontracting information is only requested for the Construction Experience portion of the factor (not Design) since the Construction Experience represents the Offeror responsible for the management of the subcontracting program. Please confirm that Attachment E is only required for Construction

Experience projects.

Confirmed. Attachment E is only required for Construction

Experience projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate

Experience. See Amendment

0002 for clarification.

08/18/25 Attachment C, Box 4

Please confirm that the "Design

Completion Date" on Attachment

C needs only to be completed on the Design Experience project sheets, and not on the Construction

Experience project sheets.

Confirmed. The "Design

Completion Date" on

Attachment C is only required for Design Experience projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience.

08/20/25 10 Factor 1, Corporate

Experience

(1)

Construction

Experience

Will the government please confirm that if a project was performed as the Prime (being responsible for 100% of the construction) for a public-private agency, then that will be considered work as a Prime

Contractor for the solicitation?

Yes, projects performed as the

Prime will be considered work as a Prime Contractor.

08/22/25 10 of 61 Factor 1 (2) Design

Experience

Submission instructions say

"Offerors shall clearly state the

Architecture-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the

Designer of Record (DOR) for future task orders under this

MACC. Given the anticipated size, scope, and complexity of the

MACC over the contract period, please confirm that contractors may team with more than one

DOR to ensure adequate design capability and capacity to meet the contractual requirements for various project types and locations.

Confirmed. Offerors may team with more than one DOR. All

DORs must comply with RFP requirements.

08/22/25 10 of 61 Factor 1 (2) Design

Experience

Submission instructions say

"Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant projects performed by the designer of record (DOR) that best demonstrate the DOR's experience in a diverse range of design tasks similar in size and scope/complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC. If the

Offeror is proposing more than one

DOR, and identifying them in

Factor 2: Management Approach, is the Offeror to present a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) relevant projects in Factor 1 for each DOR identified, or, is the Offeror to present a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) design projects total, from their proposed

DOR pool?

If the Offeror is proposing more than one DOR, the

Offeror is still limited to submitting a minimum of three

(3) up to a maximum of five (5) projects total for Factor 1, Design Experience.

08/26/25 RFP page 8 of 61

Responsibility

Determination

Information

We respectfully request the option to email our financial statements directly to the contracting officer instead of including them as part of our price proposal. Thank you.

Yes, Offeror's may submit financial statements via email instead of including them as part of the price proposal.

However, emailed submissions of financial statements must still comply with the proposal due date.

08/29/25 RFP page 12 of 61

Factor 1, Corporate

Experience

Under the Basis of Evaluation, it states that relevant projects that demonstrate the ability to perform multiple projects simultaneously may be considered more favorably.

Please provide further clarification on this criteria and advise how we should best demonstrate this within

Attachment C.

The RFP states "simultaneous projects must have been submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience." More favorable consideration for this element will be evident based on project Award and

Completion dates included on

Attachment C.

08/29/25 RFP

Attachments

H & G

Please confirm that Attachment G is for P-1538 SOF Armory seed project small business participation only and that Attachment H relates to the overall MACC small business participation and our commitment to achieve the outlined goals.

The Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) relates to the basic MACC as a whole, not to the seed Task

Order.

08/29/25 RFP page

10-11 of 61

Factor 1, Corporate

Experience

If we have a relevant D-B project completed together by the Prime

Contractor and Designer of

Record, should we include under both the Construction experience and Design experience, since this would receive a more favorable rating under both sections?

Please bid per RFP. "Relevant projects where the offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not previously worked together."

09/02/25 10 00 21 00 1 1) Section 00 21 00, (1) Factor 1, corporate experience: (i) (1)

Construction Experience (2) states, (on page 10 paragraph 1) “Projects submitted for the offer shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the issuance of this RFP.”

QUESTION: Understanding the length of these projects will the government please consider

Projects that have been completed within the past eight (8) years

Projects for Construction

Experience that have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP will be considered. See Amendment

0002.

09/02/25 11 00 21 00 2 Section 00 21 00, (1) Factor 1, corporate experience: (i) (2)

Design Experience (1) states, (on page 11 paragraph 2) “Projects submitted for the DOR shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the issuance of this RFP.” QUESTION:

Understanding the length of these projects will the government please consider projects that have been completed within the past eight (8) years

Projects for Design Experience that have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this

RFP will be considered. See

Amendment 0002.

09/03/25 RFP page

10-11 of 62

Factor 1, Corporate

Experience

Would it be acceptable to incorporate more than one design firm into our proposal/org chart, especially if it helps to further demonstrate small business participation, so as long as we are able to clearly demonstrate how the two firms would collaborate and/or divide individual task orders? We feel this would be an added benefit to the

Government due the large capacity of the MACC, overall duration, and unknown timing/potential overlap of individual task orders.

Especially considering that the

RFP strongly encourages participation of the prime on every task order.

Confirmed. Offerors may team with more than one DOR. All

DORs must comply with RFP requirements.

09/04/25 14 of 61 (4) Factor 4 2 3) Section 00 21 00, (4) Factor 4, Past Performance: (i) Solicitation submittal requirements states, (on page 14 paragraph 2), “offers shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQ or CPARS previously submitted for other

RFPs. However, this does not preclude the government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.”

Our interpretation of the above

RFP excerpt is as follows: PPQ's of previously submitted for other

RFP's are admissible as long as they follow all requirement in this

RFP, are submitted on the standard attachment D, and NOT incorporated simply by reference.

If the above interpretation is inaccurate, please consider allowing PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs given in many instances project points of contact are no longer with the respective federal agency.

PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs will not be considered. Newly completed PPQs must be included for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 - Corporate

Experience. As stated in the

Solicitation, "If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed

PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the

PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s)."

09/04/25 Solicitation Please confirm that the Small

Business Subcontracting Plan should be completed for the entire

MACC and not the individual seed project value.

The Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) relates to the basic MACC as a whole, not to the seed Task

Order.

09/04/25 15 00 21 00 (5)(i)2. Please confirm if dollar values and subcontracting commitments within the Small Business participation Commitment

Document relate to the seed project or basic MACC.

Dollar values and subcontracting commitments within the Small Business participation Commitment

Document relate to the basic

MACC as a whole.

09/04/25 8 00 21 00 4.3.(a) Please confirm if dollar values and subcontracting commitments within the Small Business

Subcontracting Plan relate to the seed project or basic MACC.

The Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) relates to the basic MACC as a whole, not to the seed Task

Order.

09/04/25 15 00 21 00 (5)(i) Please confirm if Attachment E is to be submitted for just construction experience or for both construction and design experience.

Attachment E is to be submitted for each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience for

Construction Experience only.

See Amendment 0002 for clarification.

09/08/25 13 00 21 00 4.(3)(ii) As written, the Basis of Evaluation for Safety rates (DART and TCR) appears to favor declining trends over consistently very low rates.

This suggests an Offeror whose rates trend from Moderate Risk to

Low Risk may receive a higher rating that an Offeror whose rates remain Very Low Risk year-after-year. As this is counter to the

Government's intent to hire the safest contractors, please consider revising the wording.

DART and TCR trends that remain at Low Risk or Very

Low Risk for the five (5) previous complete calendar years indicated in the

Solicitation may also indicate a

Strength.

09/08/25 Bid date Subs are asking for some more time as other government projects have just moved dates to the day before this project and they will not be able to turn this around the next day they are asking for end of that week.

See Amendment 0002 for revised proposal due date.

09/08/25 15 of 61 (5) Factor 5 2 Section 00 21 00, (5) Factor 5, small business utilization and participation: (i) Solicitation submittal requirements, 1. states, (on page 15 paragraph 3), “1. All offerors (large, non-profits, AND small businesses) shall use

Attachment E (Historical Small

Business Utilization) to demonstrate their historical utilization of SBs. Each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, shall be included on Attachment E. Failure to include each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate

Experience, on Attachment E, or the failure to fully complete

Attachment E for each project may result in a deficiency..”

This section requires small business utilization and participation information from all

“Offerors”. Our understanding of the offeror is the organization or corporation that is submitting the offer as a prime contractor and executes the 1442. Additionally, this section also requests an attachment E for “each project submitted under factor 1”.

QUESTION: Please confirm/clarify that the government would like to see an attachment “E” completed and submitted only for projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience by the offeror/contractor?

Confirmed, Attachment E is to be submitted for each project submitted by the Offeror under

Factor 1, Corporate Experience for Construction Experience only. See Amendment 0002 for clarification.

09/09/25 General Please extend the bid date three additional weeks due to manufactures and subcontractors bid schedules.

See Amendment 0002 for revised proposal due date.

09/09/25 General After award, the Contracting

Officer will provide a NTP to the awardee. What is the approximate duration between issuing the award and issuing the NTP?

See Block 11 (Page 1) of the

Solicitation. The contractor shall begin performance within

15 calendar days after receiving award.

09/09/25 General For planning the preliminary project schedule, what is the anticipated award date?

Use an estimated contract award date of 30 DECEMBER

2025. Please note, this is an estimated date for proposal purposes only and not dispositive of an anticipated/actual award date.

08/27/25 SF 1442 Contractor is requesting 21 days extension to work on proposal documents specifically the PPQ's, teaming agreements, etc. request to make sure all these are available and timely for the proposal technical.

See Amendment 0002 for revised proposal due date.

08/27/25 Site Visit Will you provide the site visit sign in sheet?

See Amendment 0002 for Site

Visit Log.

08/27/25 SF 1442 Will you allow RFI follow up request to contractor questions on the government responses?

Sometimes a little clarification is needed.

PPI follow up after government responses have been posted

(via amendment) will not be provided.

08/27/25 SF 1442 Will you be providing RFI responses to all contractor submitted questions in amendments?

Responses will be provided to all PPIs received prior to the cut-off date via amendments posted to SAM.gov and PIEE.

There is no guarantee that PPI's submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

08/27/25 SF 1442 When does the government expect to award the seed project so that we can create a preliminary schedule for staffing, pricing, scheduling, planning, etc.?

Use an estimated contract award date of 30 DECEMBER

2025. Please note, this is an estimated date for proposal purposes only and not dispositive of an anticipated/actual award date.

08/27/25 SF 1442 00 00 00 Section 00 00 00 of SF 1442 notes

DPAS rate of DO-C2 8-6-2025.

Does this DPAS rating apply to the entire MACC/IDIQ period and to the Seed Project P-1538 SOF

Armory at Camp Lejeune?

The DPAS rating of DO-C2 applies to the entire

MACC/IDIQ period. This includes any Task Orders solicited under the MACC.

09/06/25 SF 1442 Bid

Guarantee

Page 42 of 62 in SF 1442 bid guarantee."(a) failure to furnish a bid guarantee in proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of bid."

For this RFP solicitation, will the government accept a 'digital copy' of the officially signed bid guarantee (SF-24) with the proposal submission documents?

Further, is the contractor to mail the 'original signed' bid guarantee to the contracting officer and at the address noted on this SF-1442 prior to submission of bid (even though the digital copy is included in the proposal submission documents)? A better solution is that the contractor mail the 'official signed' bid guarantee to the contracting officer at the address noted on SF-1142, even though the

'mailed' version may not arrive the same day of proposal submission date? (This mailing will be the

'original signed' bid guarantee where the 'digital copy' is included in the proposal submission.

Please bid per RFP. Mailed submission of the bid guarantee is not required. The Bid

Guarantee in accordance with

FAR Clause 52.228-1 is to be included with the Price

Proposal (see Price Proposal

Solicitation Submittal

Requirements) in PDF format.

09/06/25 SF 1442 On 8/27/25 contractor requested 21 days extension to allow time for

PPQ's to be provided. Today, 9/6 is 10 work days to submission, which will not be enough time to flow down the amendment and PPI government responses prior to 9/23 current submission date.

Contractor ie requesting 28 days extension to allow time for official

PPI Reponses and by amendment to be flowed down to sub trades and vendors to allow time for scope and price review.

See Amendment 0002 for revised proposal due date.

09/09/25 Page 3 Attachment G Item 1. Is the Subcontracting Plan based on the seed project? For example, when the Total Contract Value is requested in Item 1, is it referencing to the seed project?

The Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) relates to the basic MACC as a whole, not to the seed Task

Order.

09/09/25 RFP

Solicitation

Many NAVFAC commands and other DOD agencies have provided a separate due date for submission of the Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (SBSP), several days after the proposal due date, so that the offerors can finalize their SBSP based on final bid day pricing. It is our experience that final pricing from subcontractors and vendors is often not received until bid day, allowing offerors to submit their best final pricing for the

Government. This often leads to not having sufficient time to finalize the SBSP, which is based on offerors' final bid day pricing.

To provide the Government with an accurate SBSP based on actual bid day final pricing, we request that the Government allow submission of Attachment G:

Small Business Subcontracting

Plan within three days after the proposal due date, by 2:00 p.m.

EDT on 26 September 2025.

Please bid per RFP. The Small

Business Subcontracting Plan

(SBSP) is to be submitted with the Price Proposal Package, which is due by the proposal due date indicated in the

Solicitation.

09/09/25 To provide the Government with the best price and non-price solutions for this IDIQ program and seed project, we request an extension of the proposal due date to at least 10 days after receipt of all PPI responses to allow sufficient time for NAVFAC to provide all PPI responses and offerors sufficient time to review and coordinate those responses with subcontractors and vendors to provide the best pricing solutions for the Government.

See Amendment 0002 for revised proposal due date.

09/09/25 RFP Proposal

Deadline

Extension Considering the time needed to analyze/review PPI responses once received from the Government; we respectfully request a two week extension to the proposal due date.

This will allow for a more complete proposal and accurate pricing for the seed project.

See Amendment 0002 for revised proposal due date.

09/09/25 RFP Project

Duration

The Solicitation, Offer, and Award

Form dated 8/6/2025 indicates that

"The contractor shall begin performance within 15 calendar days and completion within 365 calendar days after receiving award.

General Bid Notes "b" indicates

835 calendar days after award of contract. Confirm is it is 835 and not 365 calendar days.

The 365 calendar days indicated in Block 11 relates to the MACC as a whole and represents the base year of the

MACC IDIQ. The 835 days indicated in the General

Requirements and on the Price

Proposal Form represents the duration of the seed Task

Order.

3. The proposal due date is extended from 23 September 2025 to 07 October 2025 at 1400 EDT. The PPI cutoff date of 09 September 2025 remains unchanged. See updates to Instructions to Offerors section 5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL

INQUIRIES (PPIs) as denoted in red below:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist by the date specified herein in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. There is no guarantee that PPI's submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes. Submit all questions to james.a.godwin41.civ@us.navy.mil. Use of the PPI Log template is required. The PPI Log Template (Attachment A) can be found on Contract Opportunities under the Attachments section.

PPI Questions shall be submitted no later than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the proposal due date.

All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist by the date specified herein in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. There is no guarantee that PPI's submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes. Submit all questions to james.a.godwin41.civ@us.navy.mil. Use of the PPI Log template is required. The PPI Log Template (Attachment A) can be found on Contract Opportunities under the Attachments section.

PPI Questions shall be submitted no later than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the original proposal due date of

23 September 2025.

(End of Summary of Changes)

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE, NORFOLK VA 23511-0395

NORFOLK, VA 23511-0395

UNITED STATES

JAMES GODWIN, Email: james.a.godwin41.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 7573411999 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS:

The proposal due date of 23 September 2025 NLT 2:00 PM EDT has been extended to 07 October 2025 NLT 2:00 PM EDT. See Continuation Page(s).