N4008525R2507.pdf

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date)

11. The contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See ).

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

b. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

AMOUNTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT

NUMBER

DATE.

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print)

31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31c. DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014) BACK

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

N4008525R2507

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

DB/DBB, IDIQ MACC for General Construction Services to Serve NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic's Marine Corps Installations (MCI) East AOR

Defense Priorities Allocation System (DPAS) Priority Rating: DO-C2 Date: 06 Aug 2025

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule

Additional Information/Notes

Allowed Per Order Minimum: 5,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Maximum: 150,000,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Contractor Obligation to Deliver Maximum: 975,000,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Government Obligation to Order Minimum: 5,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Item Supplies/Service Estimated Quantity

Unit Unit Price Amount

DESIGN-BUILD/DESIGN-BID-BUILD

(DB/DBB), INDEFINITE

DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ)

MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

(MACC) FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION

SERVICES TO SERVE NAVFAC

MID-ATLANTIC'S MARINE CORPS

INSTALLATIONS (MCI) EAST AOR,

INCLUDING NORTH CAROLINA AND SOUTH

CAROLINA

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

975,000,000 Project

Section 00 20 00 - Instructions for Procurements

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction). (Alternate I) (Feb 1995) Alternate I (Feb 1995)

Alternate I . If an organized site visit will be conducted, substitute a paragraph substantially the same as the following for paragraph (b) of (Feb 1995) the basic provision:

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-

Please refer to Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS, 5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, 5.1 SITE VISIT.

(c) Participants will meet at-

Please refer to Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS, 5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, 5.1 SITE VISIT.

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

5.1 SITE VISIT

5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

5.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5.5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

6. ATTACHMENTS

6.1 ATTACHMENT A - PPI LOG TEMPLATE

6.2 ATTACHMENT B - PIEE VENDOR ACCESS INSTRUCTIONS

6.3 ATTACHMENT C - CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

6.4 ATTACHMENT D - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

6.5 ATTACHMENT E - HISTORICAL SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

6.6 ATTACHMENT F - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION COMMITMENT DOCUMENT (SBPCD)

6.7 ATTACHMENT G - SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (SBSP) TEMPLATE

6.8 ATTACHMENT H - P1538 SPECS

6.9 ATTACHMENT I - P1538 DWG

6.10 ATTACHMENT J - PRICE PROPOSAL FORM

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.1.1 THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ISSUED AS "UNRESTRICTED" FOR FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION. THE NAICS CODE FOR

THIS PROCUREMENT IS 236220 AND THE SIZE STANDARD IS $45M.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2.1 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in accordance with the requirements designated by sections of the FAR 15.203.

This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source(s) whose performance provides the best value to the Government. This acquisition will be solicited as a competitively negotiated procurement as "Unrestricted" for full and open competition.

1.2.2 The Government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals at any time prior to award; to negotiate with any or all offerors; to award the contracts to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; to award to other than the offeror submitting the highest technically rated proposal; and to award to the offeror submitting the proposal determined by the Government to be the most advantageous (best value) to the Government. OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT AWARD MAY BE MADE WITHOUT DISCUSSION OR ANY CONTACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms. Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the offeror to revise its proposal.

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

1.3.1 This acquisition will result in the award of a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Design-Build/Design-Bid- Build (DB/DBB) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for General Construction Services primarily in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic's Marine Corps Installations (MCI) East AOR. Work may be required in other areas in the area of responsibility of NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic if deemed necessary. The Government intends to award approximately five (5) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offerors whose proposals represent the best values after evaluation in accordance with the factors and their relative importance, unless more or less than five (5) is determined to be the best value to the Government.

1.3.2 Construction projects to be performed under this MACC will primarily consist of general building type projects and may be either Design-Bid- Build or Design-Build. General construction of DB and DBB projects include, but are not limited to, new construction, demolition, repair, alteration, and renovation of buildings, systems and infrastructure and may include civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, and communication systems. Types of facilities include administrative, industrial, maintenance, warehouses, hangars, communications, personnel support, recreation, lodging, dormitory, medical, roads, etc. in support of NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic's Marine Corps Installations (MCI) East AOR.

1.3.3 The completion date for the IDIQ contracts is one (1) year from the date of contract award with four (4) one-year option periods, not to exceed 60 months. The total five-year (base and four 12-month options) estimated construction cost for all contracts is not to exceed $975,000,000 for the life of the contract. Projects for the MACC have an estimated construction cost between $25,000,000 and $150,000,000; however, smaller and larger dollar value projects may be considered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. The Government guarantees an award amount of $5,000 to each successful offeror.

1.3.4 After award of the initial contracts and "seed" project, the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders based on best value, using the tradeoff process or lowest price technically acceptable (to include lowest price), to be determined on each task order. Only the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders.

1.3.5 The intent of this contract is that all MACC Contractors participate in pre-proposal conferences and site-visits and submit proposals on each task order. Contract awardees will be expected to submit a proposal for all Task Order Requests for Proposal (RFP) received from the Government.

However, in the event a MACC awardee is unable to submit a proposal on a particular RFP, the contractor is required to notify, in writing, the Contracting Officer who issued the RFP and the ACO for the basic contract within five (5) working days from receipt of the RFP. A MACC awardee can only elect to withdraw from submitting a proposal on three (3) task order RFPs during the course of each year of the contract (base plus four options). Additional withdrawal requests, in excess of three (3) per year, may result in the Government choosing not to exercise remaining option terms.

1.3.6 Each task order will contain project specific evaluation factors that will vary depending on the unique requirements for each task order.

Additionally, each task order will cite a specific completion date and associated liquidated damages.

1.3.7 Contractor Performance Information: Contractor's performance will be evaluated using the respective contractor performance evaluation report entry system located on the website http://www.cpars.gov/. Prior to commencement of work the contractor is required to provide the government with the name, phone number and email address of the "Contractor's Representative" that will be responsible for receipt and review of draft performance evaluations prepared by the government in the appropriate system. It is the contractor's responsibility to keep this contact information current.

2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT

2.1 The initial project ("seed project") that will be awarded as the first task order concurrently with the basic contract is P-1538, SOF Armory located at MARSOC Complex, Stone Bay, Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. The work consists of the construction of an SOF Armory building, supporting site infrastructure extensions, and distribution and improvements. Site infrastructure includes domestic water distribution, sanitary sewer distribution, and communications utility distribution. Site improvements include POV parking lots, tactical drives and aprons, Armory compound fencing and MARSOC installation fencing perimeter, and incidental related work.

*Solicitation Section 00 73 00 will include the General Requirements for the seed project.

Pursuant to FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds, the Government's obligation under this solicitation, or any task order or contract that might result from the solicitation is entirely subject to, and contingent upon, the availability of appropriated funds. Should the Government be unable to award the seed project, the Government guarantees an award in the amount of $5,000 to each successful offeror upon award of the Multiple Award Construction Contracts. This minimum guarantee is over the full term of the contract, including option years. No legal liability on the part of the Government shall arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer and a task order or contract is awarded by the Contracting Officer. Any offeror proposing on this solicitation does so at its own cost and with the full knowledge that a task order for the seed project, might not result from this solicitation.

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract(s); to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract(s) to the offeror(s) submitting the proposal(s) determined to represent the best value--the proposal(s) most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. All technical factors, when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a Deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the Deficiency is corrected through discussions, if held. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-cost/price factors will result in an overall rating of "Unacceptable" for the non-cost/price factors, unless corrected through discussions, if held. Proposals may be found to have either a

Significant Weakness or multiple Weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board's assessment of the identified Weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the Weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 - Corporate Experience Factor 2 - Management Approach Factor 3 - Safety Factor 4 - Past Performance Factor 5 - Small Business Utilization and Participation

The distinction between Corporate Experience and Past Performance is Corporate Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past Performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, 3, and 5) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the offerors' non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal's superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy via PIEE of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below. The Price and Non-price Factors shall be submitted in separate files and submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF). Price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

Cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address;

Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged;

Price Proposal Form for the Seed Project;

Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management

(SAM);

Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS) VETS-4212 for the2023/2024 filing cycle;

Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million; and Responsibility Determination Information (see below).

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs). Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442. All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.

(i) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, offeror shall provide a cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address, with its proposal.

(ii) Completed Price Proposal Form for the Seed Project that includes all contract line item numbers (CLINs).

(iii) Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the seed project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(iv) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00 45 00 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal. The Contracting Officer will verify the Offeror's registration in SAM at time of submission of an offer and at the time of contract award, unless an exemption applies under FAR 4.1102(a).

(v) FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(vi) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report (2023/2024 filing cycle) has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

(vii) Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable): If the offeror is a JV, clearly submit the name of each entity that comprises the JV (offeror).

For each entity, provide the complete name of the firm, address of the entity, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address. Provide a copy of the signed JV agreement.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. Although required to be submitted with offeror's price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm's responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. In a separate Tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror's firm has a line of credit - provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures - exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror's facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror's work presently under contract.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN INFORMATION (Reference FAR 52.219-9 ALT II and DFARS 252.219-7003)

In accordance with FAR 19.7, all other than small businesses shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) utilizing the template provided as Attachment G. Acceptability of the SBSP will be considered a responsibility matter. The SBSP will not be evaluated or rated by the SSEB but reviewed by a Small Business Professional/Authorized Representative and the Contracting Officer for acceptability. The SBSP shall be negotiated and/or accepted within the time specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure to negotiate an acceptable subcontracting plan within the time limit prescribed by the Contracting Officer will render the offeror ineligible for award of the contract. The SBSP will be incorporated into the resulting contract.

NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging, small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition consistent with efficient and effective performance of the contract. These targets are based on a percentage of total planned subcontract dollars. These goals will be incorporated into the solicitation.

Small Business (SB) 40% Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 5% HUBZone SB 3% Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) 9% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 5%

The SBSP shall be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Utilization and Participation factor. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c)(i), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, those small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in the SBSP.

Please note that SBSP goals and the participation rates provided in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) WILL NOT be the same. The participation rates within the SBPCD are provided as percentages of the total contract value; subcontract plan goals are provided as a percentage of planned subcontracting dollars. While the percentages will differ, the types of products/services identified in the SBSP, should be the same as those products/services identified in the SBPCD. Likewise, the planned small business subcontract dollars in the SBSP will be equal to (or in some cases greater than) the extent of small business participation identified in the SBPCD.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for the seed project. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see attached Price Proposal Form). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of

Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-price Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the offeror that best demonstrate your experience on relevant projects (similar in Size and Scope/Complexity as defined below).

Experience shall be that of the offeror, performed as the Prime Contractor. Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for Construction Experience. Furthermore, experience of the offeror while working as a subcontractor will not be considered.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A final construction cost of $25,000,000 or greater. At least one (1) relevant project must have a final construction cost of $75,000,000 or greater. Final construction cost is defined as the total price paid by the customer for the construction services, including original contract award amount and any modifications executed during performance. See also the notes below regarding projects that include both new construction and renovation work.

Scope/Complexity: Individual projects shall demonstrate experience with at least one of the following to be considered relevant:

New construction of either a commercial building or an industrial building (a "New Construction Project").

Renovation of a building that includes repairs or alterations to multiple building systems and infrastructures (e.g. mechanical, electrical, architectural, fire protection) (a "Renovation Project").

In addition to meeting the above Size and Scope/Complexity, submitted relevant projects shall, cumulatively, demonstrate the following characteristics:

(1) Experience with both a New Construction Project (at least one (1) relevant project) and a Renovation Project (at least one (1) relevant project).

(2) Experience with a Design-Build (DB) project (at least one (1) relevant project).

Notes:

The offeror must clearly identify the building systems repaired or altered in each Renovation Project within their narrative. The project may be determined Not Relevant if the Government is unable to determine which building systems were repaired. Additionally, work that is strictly ancillary to a main system will not be considered as multiple systems (e.g. electrical work ancillary to mechanical installation).

Projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will be considered Not Relevant.

Submitted projects may include both new construction and renovation. However, if a submitted project contains both new construction and renovation work, the offeror shall clearly delineate the dollar value for the portion of the final construction cost associated with the new construction work and the renovation work in the project description. In order for a project to be considered relevant as a New Construction Project, the new construction work must independently meet the above Size and Scope/Complexity requirements. Likewise, in order for a project to be considered relevant as a Renovation Project, the renovation work must independently meet the above Size and Scope/Complexity requirements. A project may be determined not to satisfy relevancy requirements for new construction or renovation if the Government is unable to determine whether the project meets the respective requirements.

Projects submitted for the offeror shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Ongoing projects will not be considered. If the contract completion date is not clearly identified, the Government may deem the project Not Relevant.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly identifies whether or not the project is new construction or renovation, the final construction cost, and addresses how the project meets the Size and Scope/Complexity requirements. The absence of any such information may result in the Project being considered Not Relevant, which could result in a rating of UNACCEPTABLE for this Factor.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project and will not be considered; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate Construction and Design Experience, the offeror must submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design or the Government may not consider the project. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages. Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), recent/relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have such experience, recent/relevant experience may be submitted for individual JV partners. Experience submitted for individual JV partners in which the company was a partner in a different Joint Venture entity may be submitted to demonstrate relevant project experience;

however, the offeror must specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted project was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and demonstrate that the work meets the above Size and Scope/Complexity requirements or the project may be considered Not Relevant.

Offerors who fail to submit experience for all JV members may be rated lower (except for offerors covered by Mentor Protege Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration). Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

For a JV, the offeror shall submit a signed JV agreement. For 8(a) Mentor-Protege Joint Venture, the offeror shall submit the signed SBA Mentor- Protege Approval Letter and signed JV agreement.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the Project Data Sheet shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The Project Data Sheet shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies shall commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the Project Data Sheet shall clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The Project Data Sheet shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the offeror in performance of the contract. Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.

(2) Design Experience:

While the seed project is not design-build, design-build projects may be contemplated under this MACC. Therefore, the offeror is required to address the design firm to be proposed on future projects.

Offerors shall clearly state the Architect-Engineer firm that is proposed to be utilized as the Designer of Record (DOR) for future task orders under this MACC. Provide the full name of the firm, address, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), and CAGE code. The designated firm will be required to be utilized as the DOR on future design-build task orders under the resulting MACC, unless a substitution is approved by the Contracting Officer for the proposed task order.

Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant projects performed by the that best designer of record (DOR) demonstrate the DOR's experience in a diverse range of design tasks similar in Size and Scope/Complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant design project is further defined as follows:

Size: A design project with a final construction cost of $25,000,000 or greater. At least one (1) relevant project must have a final construction cost of $75,000,000 or greater. Final construction cost is defined as the total price paid by the customer for the construction services, including original contract award amount and any modifications executed during performance. See also the notes below regarding projects that include both new construction and renovation work.

Scope/Complexity: Individual projects shall demonstrate experience with at least one of the following to be considered relevant:

New construction of either a commercial building or an industrial building (a "New Construction Project").

Renovation of a building that includes repairs or alterations to multiple building systems and infrastructures (e.g. mechanical, electrical, architectural, fire protection) (a "Renovation Project").

In addition to meeting the above Size and Scope/Complexity, submitted relevant projects shall, cumulatively, demonstrate the following characteristics:

(1) Experience with both a New Construction Project (at least one (1) relevant project) and a Renovation Project (at least one (1) project).

Notes:

The offeror must clearly identify the building systems repaired or altered in each Renovation Project within their narrative. The project may be determined Not Relevant, if the Government is unable to determine which building systems were repaired. Additionally, work that is strictly ancillary to a main system will not be considered as multiple systems (e.g. electrical work ancillary to mechanical installation).

Projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will be considered Not Relevant.

Submitted design projects may include both new construction and renovation. However, if a submitted project contains both new construction and renovation work, the offeror shall clearly delineate the dollar value for the portion of the final construction cost associated with the new construction work and the renovation work in the project description. In order for a project to be considered relevant as a New Construction Project, the new construction work must independently meet the above Size and Scope /Complexity requirements. Likewise, in order for a project to be considered relevant as a Renovation Project, the renovation work must independently meet the above Size and Scope/Complexity requirements. A project may be determined not to satisfy relevancy requirements for new construction or renovation if the Government is unable to determine whether the project meets the respective requirements.

Projects submitted for the DOR shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Submitted projects that were not completed within this timeframe will be considered "Not Relevant". For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C). The project will be considered "Not Relevant" if the design completion date is not clearly provided.

For all submitted projects, ensure that the project description clearly identifies whether or not the project is new construction or renovation, the final construction cost, and addresses how the project meets the above Size and Scope/Complexity requirements. The absence of any such information may result in the Project being considered Not Relevant, which could result in a rating of UNACCEPTABLE for this Factor.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery /indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project and will not be considered; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate Construction and Design Experience, the offeror must submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design or the Government may not consider the project. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages. Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the Project Data Sheet shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The Project Data Sheet shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies shall commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the Project Data Sheet shall clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The Project Data Sheet shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the offeror in performance of the contract. Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.

The offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor as the Designer of Record in order to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The offeror must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. If the agreement/letter is not provided or meaningful involvement is not demonstrated, experience of the proposed designer will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror's demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror's relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review the first five projects submitted for Construction Experience and the first five projects submitted for Design Experience. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not previously worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate the ability to perform multiple projects simultaneously (simultaneous projects must have been submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience) may be considered more favorably than those who do not have experience performing multiple simultaneous projects.

The offeror may receive more favorable consideration if it demonstrates four or more Relevant projects.

(2) Factor 2, Management Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall submit a detailed narrative Management Plan describing how the offeror intends to successfully complete the work under this MACC.

The narrative plan shall not exceed ten (10) pages and, at a minimum, must address the following:

Offeror's strategy for successful execution of the work awarded under the resulting contract.

Offeror's strategy for managing multiple concurrent projects and managing the geographic coverage of the contract requirements.

Offeror's plan for accomplishing the varied scope of work (address both Design-Build and Design-Bid-

) for general construction projects.Build (fully designed) The offeror shall provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms they will perform with under this contract. (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. (The organizational chart is not part of the page limitation).

Offeror's plan for responding to proposed task orders that may have short response times or are solicited simultaneously.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The narrative will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror's management approach will contribute to successful performance for this contract.

Proposals providing greater detail and demonstrating a greater understanding of the requirements, as outlined above, may be rated higher. Failure to address all elements set out above will render the proposal Unacceptable.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture;

however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' [CY2020, CY2021, CY2022, CY2023, and CY2024] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no DART rate, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above Moderate Risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000 and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

DART RATE=(Number of DART Incidents x 200,000)/(Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked)

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' [CY2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above Moderate Risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

TCR RATE=(Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000)/(Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked)

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the offeror's approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the offeror's own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) pages.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC's Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors.