J.27 Engineering Proposal Evaluation Questions.pdf
PDF 915 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Power Systems Installation Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-21-R-00088
About this file
This document outlines evaluation criteria for proposals submitted in response to a Federal Aviation Administration solicitation seeking design and installation services for power systems and ancillary equipment. Offerors must submit qualification packages for categories including uninterruptible power supply, engine generator, and fuel storage tank installation and design projects. The packages require project cost breakdowns, schedules, cutover plans, and narratives describing previous relevant work. Evaluation criteria include questions to assess whether the offeror's submissions adequately address staff experience, drawings, studies, compliance, and completeness. Proposals are due by March 10, 2021 for consideration under Solicitation 6973GH-21-R-00088.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENGINEERING PROPOSAL EVALUATION
CONTENTS
UPS INSTALLATION:
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
UPS DESIGN:
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
EG INSTALLATION:
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
EG DESIGN:
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
FST INSTALLATION
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
FST DESIGN
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
CPDS INSTALLATION:
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
CPDS DESIGN:
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
ELD INSTALLATION
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
ELD DESIGN
CATEGORY 1
CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3
UPS INSTALLATION:
CATEGORY UPS SIZE RANGE
Category 1 10 kVA to 160 kVA
Category 2 60 kVA to 225 kVA or more
Category 3 Two (2) or more, 200 kVA to 550 kVA
The Offeror must submit an Installation Package that includes Project Cost, Construction
Schedule, Cutover Plan and Narrative on a previously completed project, as follows:
The Offeror must breakdown the Project Costs by engineering discipline (Architectural, Electrical, Mechanical, Civil, Structural, Geotechnical, and other disciplines as required) and include
1. Quantity (Units of Measure, Number of Units, Labor Hours per task)
2. Material Costs (Per Unit and Total)
3. Labor Cost (Per Unit, Labor Rate and Total)
4. Additional Costs (Disposal, Storage Space, Transportation, Mobilization/Demobilization, Temporary Equipment and any other costs).
The Offeror’s Construction Schedule must show proper sequence of tasks, milestones, dates and duration.
The Offeror’s Cutover Plan must include description of Shutdown(s) or Cutover(s), any assumptions and sequence of work.
The Offeror’s Narrative must describe a previously completed 3-Phase UPS Installation, addressing questions in the respective Categories, within the following size ranges the Offeror is applying for outlined above.
CATEGORY 1
1. Does the submitted Category 1 UPS project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror break down the Project Cost by Engineering Discipline?
3. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Quantity in sufficient detail?
4. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Material Costs in sufficient detail?
5. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Labor Costs in sufficient detail?
6. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Additional Costs in sufficient detail?
7. Is the Project Cost organized and structured in a way that pricing can be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
8. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows the proper sequence of tasks and durations?
9. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows Milestones and Dates?
10. Does the Offeror submit a Cutover Plan that includes a description of Shutdown(s) or
Cutover(s), any assumptions and a sequence of work for the project submitted?
11. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe UPS Size, Manufacturer, and Model number of the unit installed?
12. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Flooded/Wet cell batteries or installing Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) batteries?
13. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system in order to keep facility operational during construction?
14. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing Battery Cabinets or Battery racks with seismic requirements?
15. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience wiring UPS SYNC Control?
16. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with verifying voltage, phase rotation and insulation resistance tests?
17. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with documenting and establishing any and all associated paperwork for enacting manufacturer’s warranty?
18. Is the overall Category 1 Installation package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and misrepresentations?
CATEGORY 2
1. Does the submitted Category 2 UPS project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
2. Does the Offeror break down the Project Cost by Engineering Discipline?
3. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Quantity in sufficient detail?
4. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Material Costs in sufficient detail?
5. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Labor Costs in sufficient detail?
6. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Additional Costs in sufficient detail?
7. Is the Project Cost organized and structured in a way that pricing can be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
8. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows the proper sequence of tasks and durations?
9. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows Milestones and Dates?
10. Does the Offeror submit a Cutover Plan that includes a description of Shutdown(s) or
Cutover(s), any assumptions and a sequence of work for the project submitted?
11. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe UPS Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit(s) installed?
12. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Flooded/Wet cell batteries or installing Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) batteries?
13. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system in order to keep facility operational during construction?
14. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing Battery Cabinets or Battery racks with seismic requirements?
15. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience wiring UPS SYNC Control?
16. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with verifying voltage, phase rotation and insulation resistance tests?
17. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with documenting and establishing any and all associated paperwork for enacting manufacturer’s warranty?
18. Is the overall Category 2 Installation package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and misrepresentations?
CATEGORY 3
1. Does the submitted Category 3 UPS project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
2. Does the Offeror break down the Project Cost by Engineering Discipline?
3. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Quantity in sufficient detail?
4. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Material Costs in sufficient detail?
5. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Labor Costs in sufficient detail?
6. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Additional Costs in sufficient detail?
7. Is the Project Cost organized and structured in a way that pricing can be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
8. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows the proper sequence of tasks and durations?
9. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows Milestones and Dates?
10. Does the Offeror submit a Cutover Plan that includes a description of Shutdown(s) or
Cutover(s), any assumptions and a sequence of work for the project submitted?
11. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe UPS Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit installed?
12. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Flooded/Wet cell batteries or installing Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) batteries?
13. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system in order to keep facility operational during construction?
14. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing Battery Cabinets or Battery racks with seismic requirements?
15. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience wiring UPS SYNC Control?
16. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with verifying voltage, phase rotation, insulation resistance tests, load tests and load sharing?
17. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Parallel/Redundant UPS
Systems or other redundancy configurations?
18. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience integrating UPS SCADA system with
Power Control and Monitoring Systems?
19. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with documenting and establishing any and all associated paperwork for enacting manufacturer’s warranty?
20. Is the overall Category 3 Installation package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, UPS DESIGN:
CATEGORY UPS SIZE RANGE
Category 1 10 kVA to 160 kVA Category 2 60 kVA to 225 kVA or more
Category 3 Two (2) or more, 200 kVA to 550 kVA
The Offeror must submit a Design Package, as follows:
The Offeror’s Design Package must include Narrative, Reports and Drawings Submittals as outlined below. All Drawing Submittals must meet NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards, and
Specifications as applicable.
The Offeror’s Narrative must describe their experience in designing three-phase UPS systems within the size ranges for the respective Categories the Offeror is applying for as listed above.
The Offeror’s narrative must show their experience in developing Drawing Submittals, Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) procedures, panel schedules, and Power Analysis Studies. A summary should be provided if there were anomalies or deviations to the design, and how they were resolved.
Report Submittals (In accordance with FAA Order 6950.27A and/or the latest version of IEEE
Standards) o Power Analysis Studies Report; Short Circuit Analysis (SCA), Protective Device
Coordination Analysis (PDCA) and Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA).
o Design Data Handbook
Drawing Submittals (As applicable) o Title Sheet o Drawing Index sheet.
o Demolition drawings o Control Diagram(s) o Electrical Installation Details.
o Electrical Panel Schedule(s) (Existing and New).
o Electrical Floor Plan and/or Equipment Layout (Existing and New) o Equipment Schedule o One-line electrical diagram(s) (Existing and New) o Cable and Conduit Schedule o Grounding Details per Code or FAA Orders/Standards o Temporary One-line diagram and Temporary Layouts
1. Does the submitted Category 1 UPS project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
2. Does the Offeror’s design narrative describe their experience with the Design and
Drawing Submittals on the project submitted?
3. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Power Analysis Studies on the project submitted?
4. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) on the project submitted?
5. Does the Design Package show an existing panel schedule, and describe any changes that need to be made to the panel schedule?
6. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe a summary associated with any deviations or anomalies in the design?
7. Does the Design Package provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
8. Does the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?
9. Does the Design Package include provisions for a load bank? If so, is there sufficient information for proper wiring and operation?
10. Does the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide sufficient information for proper installation?
11. Does the Design Package describe how the UPS was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)
12. Does the Design Package show appropriate NEC or FAA grounding or surge protection
IAW Standards, Specifications and Orders, in sufficient detail?
13. Is the Design Package compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable?
14. Does the Design Package provide an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?
15. Does the Design Package provide a Cable and Conduit schedule in sufficient detail?
16. Does the Design Package provide an Electrical Floor Plan and/or Equipment Layout with sufficient detail that shows where the new equipment will be installed with proper equipment clearances?
17. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment and its appropriate rating so that the part/model number given for the equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained?
18. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility in sufficient detail?
19. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram and layout in sufficient detail that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?
20. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Short Circuit Analysis (SCA) detailed enough to determine the fault current, and the various ratings of the electrical equipment?
21. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis
(PDCA) detailed enough to demonstrate a properly coordinate system?
22. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA) detailed enough to identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?
23. Is the overall Category 1 design package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and misrepresentations?
1. Does the submitted Category 2 UPS project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror’s design narrative describe their experience with the Design and
Drawing Submittals on the project submitted?
3. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Power Analysis Studies on the project submitted?
4. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) on the project submitted?
5. Does the Design Package show an existing panel schedule, and describe any changes that need to be made to the panel schedule?
6. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe a summary associated with any deviations or anomalies in the design?
7. Does the Design Package provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
8. Does the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?
9. Does the Design Package include provisions for a load bank? If so, is there sufficient information for proper wiring and operation?
10. Does the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide sufficient information for proper installation?
11. Does the Design Package describe how the UPS was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)
12. Does the Design Package show appropriate NEC or FAA grounding or surge protection
IAW Standards, Specifications and Orders, in sufficient detail?
13. Is the Design Package compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable?
14. Does the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?
15. Does the Design Package Provide a Cable and Conduit schedule in sufficient detail?
16. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Layout with sufficient detail that shows where the new equipment will be installed with proper equipment clearances?
17. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment and its appropriate rating so that the part/model given for the equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained?
18. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility in sufficient detail?
19. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram and layout in sufficient detail that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?
20. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Short Circuit Analysis (SCA) detailed enough to determine the fault current, and the various ratings of the electrical equipment?
22. Is the submitted Power Analysis Report detailed enough and provide organized Time Current
Curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices?
23. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment AFRA detailed enough to identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?
24. Does the submitted Arc Flash Risk Assessment involve calculating the Incident Energy levels at all pertinent locations in the electrical system, based on the voltage level, the available fault current, and the duration of the arcing fault?
25. Is the overall Category 2 design package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and
1. Does the submitted Category 3 UPS project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror’s design narrative describe their experience with the Design and
Drawing Submittals for the project submitted?
3. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Power Analysis Studies on the project submitted?
4. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) on the project submitted?
5. Does the Design Package show an existing panel schedule, and describe any changes that need to be made to the panel schedule?
6. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe a summary associated with any deviations or anomalies in the design?
7. Does the Design Package provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
8. Does the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?
9. Does the Design Package include provisions for a load bank? If so, is there sufficient information for proper wiring and operation?
10. Does the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide sufficient information for proper installation?
11. Does the Design Package describe how the UPS was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)
12. Does the Design Package show appropriate NEC or FAA grounding or surge protection
IAW Standards, Specifications and Orders, in sufficient detail?
13. Is the Design Package compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable?
14. Does the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?
15. Does the Design Package Provide a Cable and Conduit schedule in sufficient detail?
16. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Layout with sufficient detail that shows where the new equipment will be installed with proper equipment clearances?
17. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment and its appropriate rating so that the part/model number given for the equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained?
18. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility in sufficient detail?
19. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram and layout in sufficient detail that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?
20. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Short Circuit Analysis (SCA) detailed enough to determine the fault current, and the various ratings of the electrical equipment?
22. Is the submitted Power Analysis Report detailed enough and provide organized Time Current
Curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices?
23. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment AFRA detailed enough to identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?
24. Does the Arc Flash Risk Assessment involve calculating the Incident Energy levels at all pertinent locations in the electrical system, based on the voltage level, the available fault current, and the duration of the arcing fault?
25. Is the overall Category 3 Design Package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and
EG INSTALLATION:
CATEGORY EG SIZE RANGE
Category 1 20 - 700 kW
Category 2 400 - 1000 kW or more
Category 3 Two (2) or more, 500 - 1500 kW
The Offeror must breakdown the Project Cost by engineering discipline (Architectural, include
1. Quantity (Units of Measure, Number of Units, Labor Hours per task)
2. Material Costs (Per Unit and Total)
3. Labor Cost (Per Unit, Labor Rate and Total)
The Offeror’s Cutover Plan must include description of Shutdown(s) or Cutover(s), any assumptions and sequence of work.
The Offeror’s Narrative must describe a previously completed Engine Generator (EG) installation addressing questions in the respective Categories, within the following size ranges the Offeror is applying for outlined above.
1. Does the submitted Category 1 EG project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
2. Does the Offeror break down the Project Cost by Engineering Discipline?
3. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Quantity in sufficient detail?
4. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Material Costs in sufficient detail?
5. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Labor Costs in sufficient detail?
6. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Additional Costs in sufficient detail?
7. Is the Project Cost organized and structured in a way that pricing can be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
8. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows the proper sequence of tasks and durations?
9. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows Milestones and Dates?
10. Does the Offeror submit a Cutover Plan that includes a description of Shutdown(s) or
Cutover(s), any assumptions and a sequence of work for the project submitted?
11. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe EG Size, Manufacturer, and Model number of the unit installed?
12. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with demolition, removal, and disposal of existing EG, and associated interior and exterior equipment and systems, per drawings and State requirements?
13. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system in order to keep facility operational during construction?
14. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing all flanges, bolts, gaskets, insulating material for exhaust system and fittings to provide a complete exhaust system?
15. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Automatic Transfer
Switch (ATS)?
16. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing temporary power (EG, ATS, fuel tank, conductors and other ancillary equipment as required) to allow for removal and replacement of the existing EG and provide enough fuel (based on EG burn rate of GAL/HR) in order to keep facilities operational during construction?
17. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience wiring controls for proper EG operation, such as an Environmental Control Panel, Exhaust Fans, and/or Heaters?
18. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing fuel piping, valves, and priming, painting, and labeling the piping to indicate the type of fuel and direction of flow of all fuel lines?
19. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe providing and installing NFPA placards appropriate for the tank, identifying the fuel in the tank, and installing labels that specify the fuel type?
20. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience creating wall penetrations and performing required modifications for, exhaust fans, intake, and exhaust damper assemblies to include properly sealed, fire rated walls?
21. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing EG associated lightning protection, grounding, bonding and shielding system and connecting to existing counterpoise/earth electrode systems compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?
22. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing equipment to facilitate servicing, maintenance, and repair or replacement of equipment components? Connect equipment for ease of disconnecting, with minimum of interference with other installations?
23. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of engine generator (voltage, frequency, phase rotation and load testing)?
24. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with documenting and establishing any and all associated paperwork for enacting manufacturer’s warranty?
25. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with permitting, permitting process and regulatory compliance in sufficient detail if applicable?
26. Is the overall Category 1 Installation package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies,
1. Does the submitted Category 2 EG project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror break down the Project Cost by Engineering Discipline?
3. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Quantity in sufficient detail?
4. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Material Costs in sufficient detail?
5. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Labor Costs in sufficient detail?
6. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Additional Costs in sufficient detail?
7. Is the Project Cost organized and structured in a way that pricing can be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
8. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows the proper sequence of tasks and durations?
9. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows Milestones and Dates?
10. Does the Offeror submit a Cutover Plan that includes a description of Shutdown(s) or
Cutover(s), any assumptions and a sequence of work for the project submitted?
11. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe EG Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit installed?
12. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with demolition, removal, and disposal of existing EG, and associated interior and exterior equipment and systems, per drawings and State requirements?
13. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system in order to keep facility operational during construction?
14. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing all flanges, bolts, gaskets, insulating material for exhaust system and fittings to provide a complete exhaust system?
15. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Automatic Transfer
Switch (ATS)?
16. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing temporary power (EG, ATS, fuel tank, conductors and other ancillary equipment as required) to allow for removal and replacement of the existing EG and provide enough fuel (based on EG burn rate of GAL/HR) in order to keep facilities operational during construction?
17. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience wiring controls for proper EG operation, such as an Environmental Control Panel, Exhaust Fans, and/or Heaters?
18. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing fuel piping, valves, metering connections to E/G and priming, painting yellow, and labeling the piping to indicate the type of fuel and direction of flow of all fuel lines?
19. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe providing and installing NFPA placards appropriate for the tank, identifying the fuel in the tank, and installing labels that specify the fuel type?
20. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience creating wall penetrations and performing required modifications for, exhaust fans, intake, and exhaust damper assemblies to include properly sealed, fire rated walls?
21. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing EG associated lightning protection, grounding, bonding and shielding system and connecting to existing
22. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing equipment to facilitate servicing, maintenance, and repair or replacement of equipment components? Connect equipment for ease of disconnecting, with minimum of interference with other installations?
23. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of engine generator (voltage, frequency, phase rotation and load testing)?
24. Does the installation have a test plan to check all of the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?
25. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with documenting and establishing any and all associated paperwork for enacting manufacturer’s warranty?
26. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with permitting, permitting process and regulatory compliance in sufficient detail if applicable?
27. Is the overall Category 2 Installation package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies,
1. Does the submitted Category 2 EG project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror break down the Project Cost by Engineering Discipline?
3. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Quantity in sufficient detail?
4. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Material Costs in sufficient detail?
5. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Labor Costs in sufficient detail?
6. Does the Offeror submit a Project Cost that includes Additional Costs in sufficient detail?
7. Is the Project Cost organized and structured in a way that pricing can be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
8. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows the proper sequence of tasks and durations?
9. Does the Offeror submit a construction schedule that shows Milestones and Dates?
10. Does the Offeror submit a Cutover Plan that includes a description of Shutdown(s) or
Cutover(s), any assumptions and a sequence of work for the project submitted?
11. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe EG Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit installed?
12. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with demolition, removal, and disposal of existing EG, and associated interior and exterior equipment and systems, per drawings and State requirements?
13. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system in order to keep facility operational during construction?
14. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing all flanges, bolts, gaskets, insulating material for exhaust system and fittings to provide a complete exhaust system?
15. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Automatic Transfer
Switch (ATS)?
16. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing temporary power (EG, ATS, fuel tank, conductors and other ancillary equipment as required) to allow for removal and replacement of the existing EG and provide enough fuel (based on EG burn rate of GAL/HR) in order to keep facilities operational during construction?
17. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience wiring controls for proper EG operation, such as an Environmental Control Panel, Exhaust Fans, and/or Heaters?
18. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing fuel piping, valves, metering connections to E/G and priming, painting yellow, and labeling the piping to indicate the type of fuel and direction of flow of all fuel lines?
19. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe providing and installing NFPA placards appropriate for the tank, identifying the fuel in the tank, and installing labels that specify the fuel type?
20. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience creating wall penetrations and performing required modifications for, exhaust fans, intake, and exhaust damper assemblies to include properly sealed, fire rated walls?
21. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing EG associated lightning protection, grounding, bonding and shielding system and connecting to existing
22. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing equipment to facilitate servicing, maintenance, and repair or replacement of equipment components? Connect equipment for ease of disconnecting, with minimum of interference with other installations?
23. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of engine generator (voltage, frequency, phase rotation and load testing)?
24. Does the installation have a test plan to check all of the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?
25. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with documenting and establishing any and all associated paperwork for enacting manufacturer’s warranty?
26. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with Parallel/Redundant EG Systems or other redundancy configurations?
27. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with integrating Parallel/Redundant EG systems with Power and Control Monitoring Systems?
28. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with permitting, permitting process and regulatory compliance in sufficient detail if applicable?
29. Is the overall Category 3 Installation package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and
EG DESIGN:
CATEGORY EG SIZE RANGE
Category 1 20 - 700 kW Category 2 400 - 1000 kW or more
Category 3 Two (2) or more, 500 - 1500 kW outlined below. All Drawing Submittals must meet NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable.
The Offeror’s Narrative must describe their experience in designing Engine Generator(s) within the size ranges for the respective Categories the Offeror is applying for as listed above. The
Offeror’s narrative must show their experience in developing Drawing Submittals, Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) procedures, panel schedules, and Power Analysis Studies. A summary should be provided if there were anomalies or deviations to the design, and how they were resolved.
Report Submittals (In accordance with FAA Order 6950.27A and/or the latest version of IEEE
Standards) o Power Analysis Studies Report; Short Circuit Analysis (SCA), Protective Device
Coordination Analysis (PDCA) and Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA).
o Design Data Handbook
Drawing Submittals (As Applicable) o Title Sheet o Drawing Index sheet.
o Control Diagram o Electrical Demolition Drawings o Electrical Installation details.
o Electrical Panel-board schedule.
o Equipment Layout (Existing and New) o Equipment Schedule o Existing single-line electrical diagram.
o Cable and Conduit Schedule o New single-line electrical diagram.
o Control, heater and battery charger one line diagrams.
o Mechanical Drawings o Grounding Details per Code or FAA Orders/Standards.
o Temporary One-line diagram and Temporary Layouts
1. *Does the submitted Category 1 EG project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
2. Does the Offeror’s design narrative describe their experience with the Design and
Drawing Submittals for the project submitted?
3. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Power Analysis Studies on the project submitted?
4. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) on the project submitted?
5. Does the Design Package show an existing panel schedule, and describe any changes that need to be made to the panel schedule?
6. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe a summary associated with any deviations or anomalies in the design?
7. Does the Design Package provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
8. Does the control schematic/diagram show sufficient detail for proper installation and operation?
9. Do the mechanical drawings show the exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation in sufficient detail to build a fully functioning Code compliant system?
10. Do the mechanical drawings show the fuel system in sufficient detail to build a fully functioning Code compliant system?
11. Does the design provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
12. Does the design show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?
13. Does the design include provisions for a load bank? If so, is there sufficient information for proper wiring and operation?
14. Does the drawings indicating Remote Monitoring, and if so is it properly wired?
15. Does the Design Package describe how the EG was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)
16. Does the design show appropriate NEC or FAA grounding and surge protection IAW
Standards, Specifications and Orders, in sufficient detail?
17. Are the Drawing Submittals compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable?
18. Does the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?
19. Does the Design Package provide a Cable and Conduit schedule in sufficient detail?
20. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Layout with sufficient detail that shows where the new equipment will be installed with proper equipment clearances?
21. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment and its appropriate rating so that the part/model number given for the equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained?
22. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility in sufficient detail?
23. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram and layout in sufficient detail that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?
24. Does the Design Package indicate location of steel reinforcement bar, all new for proposed penetrations, dowel, and anchor locations?
25. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Short Circuit Analysis (SCA) detailed enough to determine the fault current, and the various ratings of the electrical equipment?
26. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis
(PDCA) detailed enough to demonstrate a properly coordinate system?
27. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment AFRA detailed enough to identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?
28. Is the overall Category 1 Design Package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and
1. *Does the submitted Category 2 EG project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror’s design narrative describe their experience with the Design and Drawing
Submittals for the project submitted?
3. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Power Analysis Studies on the project submitted?
4. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) on the project submitted?
5. Does the Design Package show an existing panel schedule, and describe any changes that need to be made to the panel schedule?
6. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe a summary associated with any deviations or anomalies in the design?
7. Does the Design Package provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
8. Does the control schematic/diagram show sufficient detail for proper installation and operation?
9. Do the mechanical drawings show the exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation in sufficient detail to build a fully functioning Code compliant system?
10. Do the mechanical drawings show the fuel system in sufficient detail to build a fully functioning Code compliant system?
11. Does the design provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
12. Does the design show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?
13. Does the design include provisions for a load bank? If so, is there sufficient information for proper wiring and operation?
14. Does the drawings indicating Remote Monitoring, and if so is it properly wired?
15. Does the Design Package describe how the EG was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)
16. Does the design show appropriate NEC or FAA grounding and surge protection IAW
Standards, Specifications and Orders, in sufficient detail?
17. Are the Drawing Submittals compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable?
18. Does the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?
19. Does the Design Package provide a Cable and Conduit schedule in sufficient detail?
20. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Layout with sufficient detail that shows where the new equipment will be installed with proper equipment clearances?
21. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained?
22. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility in sufficient detail?
23. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram and layout in sufficient detail that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?
24. Does the Design Package indicate location of steel reinforcement bar, all new proposed penetrations, dowel, and anchor locations?
25. Do the design drawings show the layout of the switchgear in the space with designated safe clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?
26. Do the design drawings address points of egress if breaker sizes are 1,200A or above per the
NEC?
27. Do the design drawings show a building controls diagram and how it’s integrated with the new power system?
28. Does the installation have a test plan to check all of the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?
29. Do the design drawings show the connections to the building fire control panel?
30. Does the design address fire pump testing with the new power system, and are the acceptable voltage drop parameters as outlined in NEC listed as part of the test plan?
31. Does the new design incorporate controls for an elevator? If so, does the elevator control panel have connections that need to be made to the new power system to alert passengers that the facility is on E/G power?
32. Does the new design incorporate controls for an elevator? If so, does the ATS send a pre-transfer signal to the elevator so that it can stop at the next floor and pause while the ATS performs a transfer?
33. Does the new design incorporate controls for an elevator? If so, does the design address voltage drop on E/G power when the elevator is operated?
34. Does the design for the new power system have a remote radiator? If so, does the design show how the coolant piping will be supported between the E/G to the radiator?
35. Does the design for the new power system have a remote radiator? If so, does the design show flexible connections being made at the E/G and the radiator for the coolant piping?
36. Does the design for the new power system have a remote radiator? If so, does the E/G show a
Cold Air Charge System as part of the design of the remote radiator?
37. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Short Circuit Analysis (SCA) detailed enough to determine the fault current, and the various ratings of the electrical equipment?
38. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis
(PDCA) detailed enough to demonstrate a properly coordinate system?
39. Is the submitted Power Analysis Report detailed enough and provide organized Time Current
Curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices?
40. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment AFRA detailed enough to identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?
41. Does the Arc Flash Risk Assessment involve calculating the Incident Energy levels at all pertinent locations in the electrical system, based on the voltage level, the available fault current, and the duration of the arcing fault?
42. Is the overall Category 2 Design Package free from errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and
1. *Does the submitted Category 3 EG project meet the requirements in Section 1.1 of
SOW?
2. Does the Offeror’s design narrative describe their experience with the Design and Drawing
Submittals for project the submitted?
3. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Power Analysis Studies on the project submitted?
4. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe their experience with Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) on the project submitted?
5. Does the Design Package show an existing panel schedule, and describe any changes that need to be made to the panel schedule?
6. Does the Offeror’s narrative describe a summary associated with any deviations or anomalies in the design?
7. Does the Design Package provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
8. Does the control schematic/diagram show sufficient detail for proper installation and operation?
9. Do the mechanical drawings show the exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation in sufficient detail to build a fully functioning Code compliant system?
10. Do the mechanical drawings show the fuel system in sufficient detail to build a fully functioning Code compliant system?
11. Does the design provide a demolition drawing that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?
12. Does the design show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?
13. Does the design include provisions for a load bank? If so, is there sufficient information for proper wiring and operation?
14. Does the drawings indicating Remote Monitoring, if so is it properly wired?
15. Does the Design Package describe how the EG was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)
16. Does the design show appropriate NEC or FAA grounding or surge protection IAW
Standards, Specifications and Orders, in sufficient detail?
17. Is the Drawing Submittals compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and
Specifications as applicable?
18. Does the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?
19. Does the Design Package provide a Cable and Conduit schedule in sufficient detail?
20. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Layout with sufficient detail that shows
21. Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained?
22. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility in sufficient detail?
23. Does the Design Package provide a Temporary One-Line diagram and layout in sufficient detail that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?
24. Does the Design Package indicate location of steel reinforcement bar, all new proposed penetrations, dowel, and anchor locations?
25. Do the design drawings show the layout of the switchgear in the space with designated safe clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA or FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?
26. Do the design drawings address points of egress if breaker sizes are 1,200A or above per the
NEC?
27. Do the design drawings show a building controls diagram and how it’s integrated with the new power system?
28. Does the installation have a test plan to check all of the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?
29. Do the design drawings show the connections to the building fire control panel?
30. Does the design address fire pump testing with the new power system, and are the acceptable voltage drop parameters as outlined in NEC listed as part of the test plan?
31. Does the design for the new power system have a remote radiator? If so, does the design show how the coolant piping will be supported between the E/G to the radiator?
32. Does the design for the new power system have a remote radiator? If so, does the design show flexible connections being made at the E/G and the radiator for the coolant piping?
33. Does the design for the new power system have a remote radiator? If so, does the E/G show a
Cold Air Charge System as part of the design of the remote radiator?
34. Does the design contain Parallel/Redundant EG Systems or other redundancy configurations?
35. Does the Design show modifying existing Power and Control Monitoring Systems?
36. Is the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Short Circuit Analysis (SCA) detailed enough to determine the fault current, and the various ratings of the electrical equipment?
37.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .