Greenville SC AE SOW CONTRACT MODIFICATION_6-17-16_FINAL_R04.pdf

Statement of Work for

Architect-Engineer Contract Modification

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

Project Name: New United States Courthouse – Greenville, SC

Project Number: NSC00216

Region: Southeast Sunbelt - Region 4

Building Name: Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. United States Courthouse

Building Address: New U.S. Courthouse: Located at the corner of East North Street and

North Spring Street in Greenville, SC

SOW Writer: Bill Cushist

Date: June 17, 2016

A-E Statement of Work Contract Modification United States Courthouse Project Greenville, South Carolina

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3

1.1 Reference Materials 3

2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3

2.1 Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) 3

2.2 Budget 4

2.3 Schedule 4

2.4 A-E Team 4

3 SCOPE OF SERVICES 4

4 ADMINISTRATION 4

4.1 Design Schedule 4

5 Owner’s Project Requirements 4

6 APPENDIX A – Scope of Work for Modification - Program Changes 5

7 APPENDIX B – Scope of Work for Modification – LEED Climate Change 8

8 APPENDIX C – Scope of Work for Modification for Sustainable SITES Initiative 9

ATTACHMENT 1 Design Schedule

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed Courthouse will be designed and constructed for the United States District Courts and various other court-related agencies. The program for the building is for 193,000 gross square feet including 70 inside, secured parking spaces. This includes 7 courtrooms (5 District and 2 Magistrate) and 9 Judges Chambers (7 District and 2 Magistrate). The District Court is currently housed in the C.F.

Haynesworth Courthouse located at 300 E. Washington St, Greenville, SC 29601.

The proposed site is located in Greenville, SC, and is approximately 1.97 acres. The site is bounded by East North, North Irvine, East Coffee and North Spring Streets. It is in close proximity to the existing United State Courthouse, nearby public parking structures and legal professional offices. This new Courthouse will be an anchor for revitalization and future development in the CBD, and its design must be compatible with that context. Further its design must reflect the dignity, enterprise, vigor, and stability of the Federal Government.

1.1 Reference Materials

Greenville, SC NSC00216 Meeting Matrix Greenville, SC Anycourt Program dated February 23, 2016 Greenville, SC US Marshals Service Requirements Greenville, SC Crosswalk dated June 2, 2016 Greenville, SC Program Rearrangement PDF Document Greenville, SC Design Milestone Schedule U.S. Courts Design Guide Requirements, dated June 2008, amended June 3, 2016 U.S. Attorneys Design Guide, dated October 2015 USMS Pub 64 Volumes 1 and 2 2014 Version; Volume 3 2005 Version P100 March 2016 P120 2007 Fit For Purpose in the Changing Climate 6.03.2016 GSA Site-Based Climate Risk and Adaptation Assessment Decision Resource RCP CMIP Greenville, SC 06.03.2016

All reference documents provided with the base contract, unless otherwise modified herein.

Base Contract

2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR)

The design services under this Statement of Work must comply with the GSA owner’s project requirements (OPR) documentation provided in Section 5. The owner’s project requirements are provided as a general description of the project and supplements Section 5, Owner Project Requirements in the base A/E Scope of Work.

2.2 Budget

The design to budget for this project is $79,000,000. All design submissions must conform to this established budget without compromising the program for the project. See FAR Clauses 52.236-22, Design Within Funding Limitations, and 52.249-8, Default (Fixed Price Supply and Service), for the GSA rights and remedies enforceable if the design exceeds the established budget.

2.3 Schedule

The design phase shall last approximately 22 months.

2.4 A-E Team

At a minimum, subject to the GSA approval, the A-E shall provide experts in disciplines listed in PBS-P100, GSA BIM Guides, and as otherwise required in this Statement of Work, with credentials as indicated, as they apply to this project. The A-E shall utilize the personnel named in its offer to perform the services required under this contract. In the event that any of the personnel named in the accepted A-E proposal (incorporated into this contract by reference) become unavailable, the A-E shall promptly submit a complete written resume for a proposed substitution, any other information necessary for the GSA to approve or disapprove, and a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitution. A-E shall obtain the GSA written consent before making any substitution for subcontractors and outside associates or consultants specifically identified and agreed to during negotiations. GSA holds the right to approve, disapprove or terminate this contract due to a proposed A-E team member becoming unavailable.

See also FAR 52.244-4 regarding subcontractors and outside associates and consultants.

3 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The A-E shall perform all services described in this Scope of Services (including services required under exercised options, if any), in accordance with applicable requirements and provisions set forth in the General Requirements above.

4 ADMINISTRATION

4.1 See Attachment 1 for the design milestone schedule.

5 OWNER’S PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

The following supplements Section 5, Owner’s Project Requirements, of the base contract:

● Per Section 1.3.10 of the Randolph Sheppard Act, PBS P100 Facilities Standards for the Public

Building Service, states:” The A/E must coordinate design with the vending facility operators to meet the needs of vendors covered by the act.”

● Reference Section II, Scope of Services, within this Statement of Work for specific owner and end user requirements

● The Government intends to utilize the Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) project delivery method for procurement and execution of construction and related services. Beginning with the construction document phase of design, the Government intends to develop early work packages such as early site, demolition, utilities and foundation. The A-E shall perform all professional services necessary for the preparation of separate complete bid documents, including all drawings and specifications, and cost estimating services for site demolition, including utilities and soil remediation; a foundation package and construction documents for the new U.S. Courthouse.

6. APPENDIX A – SCOPE OF WORK FOR MODIFICATION – PROGRAM CHANGES

I. GENERAL

The concept design for the new Greenville, SC Courthouse has been on hold while GSA awaited construction funding of the project. Prior to placing the project on hold, the concept design yielded several iterations for the Courtroom layout and the exterior site plan that continued to go through the process of “vetting” with GSA and the Courts. As of February 2016, the program for the District Court, to include Courtrooms and Chambers, United States District Clerk’s Office, Circuit Library, U.S.

Probation and the United States Marshals Service space has changed. In addition, while the project was on hold, more current versions of the USMS Publication 64 (2014), GSA’s P100 (2016), the U.S.

Courts Design Guide and the U.S. Attorney’s Design Guide have been released. The A/E’s contract is hereby modified to incorporate the current program of requirements, code and/or standard changes.

The final concept design documents shall be updated to reflect these changes in scope with the updated Final Concept Design presented to the GSA PBS Commissioner for approval.

Costs for accomplishing this modification to the A/E base scope of work are requested from the A-E for this project.

II. SCOPE OF SERVICES

A. The A/E shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, and other services as necessary for successful performance of the services requested herein.

1. Revise final concept design documents to incorporate the new program. See the attached U.S. Courts Anycourt; Greenville, SC Crosswalk; and the US Marshal’s revised program of requirements. The attached “Greenville, SC Program Rearrangement” document is also provide as a reference document and offers proposed design solutions in response to the current program of requirements; this document is attached as a reference document only to facilitate the A/E’s restacking and re-blocking of the building. Additional program requirements are provided as follows:

A. General:

One of the district courtrooms shall be designed to meet requirements for multi-defendant trials within the U.S. Courts Design Guide size standards (i.e.

2400 net square feet).

B. First Floor Reduce USMS in accordance with the new program. In addition, the A-E shall revisit the location of the USMS space within the building above the first (1st) floor.

C. Second Floor

Reduce Probation to 12,748 useable square feet (usf), in accordance with the attached Anycourt program.

2. Update the design to meet the USMS Pub 64 2014 version Volumes 1 and 2, U.S.

Courts Design Guide requirements updated June 3, 2016, U.S. Attorney Design Guide Requirements dated October 2015, LEED climate change requirements, and the P100 2016 version.

3. Update the Final Concept Design submittal and other deliverables such as the Revit

Model to address the following Concept Design Review Comments raised by the U.S.

District Courts:

A. Address the following:

1. Evaluate and provide recommended solution(s), to include estimated costs, for

ABAAS accessibility/adaptability at the court reporter/courtroom deputy bench in the Courtroom. The proposed solution(s) must be adaptable within the required 6 inch height. In addition, the AE shall ensure that the use of ramps and/or lifts in the Courtrooms are seamlessly integrated into the design of the Courtroom.

2. Provide an alternate Concept Design that allows the Law Clerk to sit adjacent to the Judge at the Judge’s Bench, i.e. at the same level and height as the Judge (elbow clerk design). The alternate bench design shall also include an estimate for the increase in cost from the current bench design. In addition, the length of the court reporter/courtroom deputy station shall be a minimum of 10’ to accommodate three people.

3. Develop adjacencies that support the sharing of the computer room and supplemental computer HVAC systems for the U.S. District Clerk’s Office and U.S. Probation Office.

4. Provide samples of metal panels and/or local building locations that have similar exterior metal panels for the Judges’ visual understanding of proposed exterior materials.

5. Demonstrate that access gates can accommodate a boom lift and other required maintenance equipment.

6. Provide photo realistic color definition renderings that visually depict and illustrate exterior materials and finishes.

B. Re-visit the following areas/issues in the final concept design of the building:

1. Design of the site and building shall include consultation with local planning officials, meeting Tier 2 standard as outlined in P100, Section 2.2.2 for Collaborative Design Process.

2. The courts intend to reuse their existing furniture. Consideration of furniture layouts provided by the Courts shall be taken in the design of the space floor plans and layout.

3. Examine means to separate lobby pedestrian entrance and exiting traffic and provide suggested alternatives

4. Provide a different solution for service access to the lower level roof. The current solution of rear symmetrical stairwells (back to back facing stair) as the service access to the lower level roof is redundant.

5. The mop closets should be strategically located throughout the building.

6. Ensure the large grand jury witness room complies with the design guide standards.

7. Revisit the layout of the Visiting Judges Chambers space to ensure functional space is provided for the copier and other office equipment.

8. Provide bookcases in Senior District Chambers per the U.S. Courts Design Guide requirement.

9. Ensure all programmatic spaces at the Magistrate Courtroom floor (i.e. transcriber office and equipment storage) meet the new Anycourt requirements.

10. Confirm adjacency and sound traveling from the District Jury Room water closet to the Courtrooms and mitigate if necessary.

11. Verify that Circuit Library technical services meets U.S. Court Design Guide requirements.

12. Compare using an outward opening gate (as designed) versus a motorized sliding gate at the loading dock entry and exit.

13. Confirm the Switch Gear room is appropriate height for the conduit needed above in the ceiling and for equipment that will be installed

14. Confirm adjacency and sound traveling from the Magistrate Jury Room water closet to the Courtrooms and mitigate if necessary.

15. Show built in bookcases in the law clerk offices for each of the US District and

Magistrate Judges’ Chambers that meet the U.S. Courts Design Guide requirements.

B. Final Concept Design Deliverables:

1. 50% Final Concept Design Submittal - Revise final concept design documents, narratives, calculations and cost estimate(s) to reflect the new program, updated codes and standards and address the above design review comments and issues.

2. 95% Pre- Final Concept Design Submittal

3. 100% Final Concept Design Submittal

C. Meetings -

1. Project Restart/ Kick off Meeting (Greenville)

2. 50% Concept Design Review Meeting (Greenville)

3. Design Peer Review (for new submittal)(Greenville)

4. 95% Concept Design Review Meeting (for new submittal)(Greenville)

5. Pre-Commissioner Review and Preparation Meeting (already covered in scope; see the attached Meeting Matrix).

6. Art In Architecture Panel Meeting

7. Final Concept Cost Estimate Reconciliation Meeting

III. SCHEDULE

The services and changes herein shall be provided in accordance with the attached updated Project Milestone Schedule. The Meeting Matrix also has been updated to reflect the changes and is attached to this Statement of Work

IV. FEE AND PAYMENT:

The Fee is in this “Request for Proposal” is for the effort associated with all direct and indirect expenses.

Fees will be paid based on services rendered.

7.0 APPENDIX B – SCOPE OF WORK FOR MODIFICATION – LEED CLIMATE

CHANGE

I. SCOPE OF SERVICES

A. The scope of work for these design services entails providing a LEED climate change study and recommendations.

Climate Change Risk Analysis Study

In accordance with, E.O. 13653, and E.O.13693 and requirements of the A-11 Circular Sections 25.5 and 31.9; the Climate Change Risk Analysis Study must evaluate the existing and future climate impacts to this federal investment. Provide professional recommendations based on the existing design and program (no redesign or new design) manage these impacts to maintain mission continuity and secure the investment over the life of the asset within the limits of scope and budget for this project. The expected service life of this asset is to the end of century (2069 - 2099 projections). Use the appendix section “Fit for Purpose in a Changing Climate” document for additional direction and climate profile details. For brevity and limiting the perceived effort, a template response form is available and GSA is available to assist and clarify during this study. The outcomes of the study must enable GSA to document climate change risks over time based on the existing design and the implications to asset management and capital improvements to implement phased adaptation to a changing climate.

B. Meetings:

One meeting will be required to discuss findings and what elements can be included in the design without an impact to current budget, program of requirements and site.

II. SCHEDULE

Milestone Schedule.

III. FEE AND PAYMENT:

The Fee in this “Request for Proposal” is for the effort associated with all direct and indirect expenses.

IV. REFERENCES

Fit For Purpose in the Changing Climate, dated 6.03.2016 GSA Site-Based Climate Risk and Adaptation Assessment Decision Resource RCP CMIP Greenville, SC dated 06.03.2016

8. APPENDIX C – SCOPE OF WORK FOR MODIFICATION – SUSTAINABLE SITES

INITIATIVE

I. GENERAL

GSA has committed to participate in the Sustainable Sites Certification Program (SITES™), managed by Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI) for its capital construction program. Through integrative design and application of sustainable design principles, all new construction projects should achieve, at a minimum, a SITES silver rating through the Green Building Rating System of the U.S. Green Building Council. GSA’s use of the SITES framework allows our land-based projects to better protect ecosystems and enhance the mosaic of benefits they continuously provide our communities, such as climate regulation, carbon storage and flood mitigation. Pursue specific SITES credits appropriate to the goals of GSA and specifically for the type of project being planned, designed and constructed.

The site for the Greenville, SC courthouse has been acquired. Certification associated with site civil and landscape components must achieve the following prerequisites to the maximum extent practicable within the established project budget to comply with SITES and the P-100 Facility Standard 2016. These design and construction considerations should be considered at the restart of the final concept design phase. The project must protect floodplain functions, preserve wetlands, limit development on designated prime soils, reduce potable water use, preserve threatened or endangered species, create a soil management plan, eliminate the use of wood from threatened tree species, restore disturbed site soils, employ an integrated site development process, control construction phase pollutants, utilize noninvasive plants, and plan for sustainable site maintenance. Some of these considerations may not apply to this particular project but will need to be documented in the certification process.

II. SCOPE OF SERVICES

The Lead Designer/A-E Team shall register the project with the GBCI at the restart of the final concept design phase and maintain the SITES™ rating checklist through completion and approval of the final design concept. This project must be certified through the GBCI with a minimum design target rating of Silver and achieving at a minimum the SITES™ certified rating.

The A-E will maintain the SITES™ rating checklist throughout the design process, and provide all GBCI consulting services required to assist the GSA in obtaining the targeted SITES certification level.

The A-E will submit documentation to the GSA and GBCI for the project to receive SITES™ credit related to design activities at completion of design. The A-E is responsible for executing the design documentation, including the provision of specified products, systems and materials, as necessary to achieve anticipated sustainability goals (silver) and for preparing related documentation to support the GSA and GBCI for construction credits within one year of building occupancy for a final SITES™ rating.

A. Deliverables:

1. Incorporate requirements into the revised concept submittals required in this Statement of Work.

B. Meetings One meeting will be required to discuss SITE elements that can be included in the design without an impact to current budget, program of requirements and site.

III. SCHEDULE

Milestone Schedule.

IV. FEE AND PAYMENT:

The Fee is in this “Request for Proposal” is for the effort associated with all direct and indirect expenses.

V. REFERENCE

Green Building Rating System of the U.S. Green Building Council All reference documents provided with the base contract, unless otherwise modified herein Base Contract

END OF SCOPE OF WORK