FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION .pdf
PDF 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RENTAL OF TWO (2) SEA WATER PUMPS
- Solicitation number
- N4215826Q0021
About this file
This document is an evaluation criteria section for a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for commercial items procurement.
The Government will award the contract to the responsible quoter whose quotation conforms to the RFQ and provides the best value, considering price and other factors. Evaluation will be based on three factors: Technical Capability, Delivery, and Price. Technical acceptability is determined by reviewing technical certifications to ensure all identified technical requirements are met. Quotations rated as "Acceptable" meet all requirements, while those rated "Unacceptable" do not. Vendors with unacceptable technical capability are disqualified from further consideration and their quotations will not be evaluated for other factors. The vendor's proposed price will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness, with all prices required to be fair and reasonable as determined by the Government. For technically acceptable quotations, delivery schedule and price are considered of equal importance in determining the award. However, price has the potential to become more significant during evaluation as the degree of equity among respondents' non-cost quotations increases, or when a quotation's price is significantly high and diminishes value to the Government. If all respondents submit equal or generally equivalent non-cost quotations, price may become the determining factor for award selection. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the low bidder based on best value determination.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR OFFERORS .pdf | ||
| Solicitation - N4215826Q0021.pdf | ||
| TECHNICAL CAPABILITY.pdf | ||
| STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation — Commercial Items is applicable to this procurement. The Government will award a contract resulting from this Request for Quotation (RFQ) to the responsible quoter whose quotation conforms to the RFQ and will be the most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:
1. Technical Capability;
2. Delivery;
3. Price
Technical acceptability will be determined by reviewing the technical certifications submitted for each item to ensure that all of the technical requirements identified are met. Technical acceptability will be defined as follows:
Technical Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Quote meets all of the requirements identified.
Unacceptable Quote does not meet all of the requirements identified.
Contractors who fail to possess acceptable technical capability will not be considered for award and the other elements of their quotation will not be evaluated.
Price: The vendor’s proposed price will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness. All prices must be considered fair and reasonable as determined by the Government.
For purposes of award amongst all of the technically acceptable quotations, delivery schedule will be considered to be of equal importance when compared to price.
NOTE: Quotations determined to be technically unacceptable shall not be further evaluated for award. Of the technically acceptable quotations, the Government reserves the right to award to other than low based upon a selection determined to be the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered.
Although price is considered to be equal in importance to delivery, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The importance of price will increase as the degree of equity in a respondent’s non-cost quotations rise. The importance of price will also increase when a quotation’s price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might have been gained under the other aspects of the quotation. If at any point in the evaluation all respondents are determined to have submitted equal or generally equivalent non-cost quotations, price may become the factor in determining the contractor selected for award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .