DRAFT_CAF_CAS_Appendix_N_-_CAF_ADAIR_Blue_1_Evaluation_2_Apr_2018.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO: DO NOT DISTRIBUTE OUTSIDE OF CONTRACT CHANNELS.

BLUE 1

Validation

Yes No

Contractor Flt Lead Concur?

Yes No

CAF ADAIR “BLUE 1” CONTRACTOR EVALUATION

INSTRUCTIONS: This evaluation supports AMIC’s Program Management on the CAF ADAIR Contract. This form is filled out by the Contractor Flight Lead, for the entire formation, during the debrief. Blue 1 must validate all responses and Contractor Flight Lead Concur/Non-Concur with Blue 1’s validation. Then Contrator Site Lead concurs/does not concur and provides the completed, signed form to the GFR.

This form is an integral part of the contract surveillance program. Data collected here is utilized in both Program Management Reviews and Award Fee Boards for program oversight. This form is designed to be user friendly, and expeditious day-to-day. Firewall “Yes” answers equates to contractor meeting performance requirements and should be the norm. A “No” answer doesn’t mean failure to perform unless there was negative consequences to the blue formation and/or blue training. Blue Flight Leads are encouraged to provide subjective feedback whenever contractor performance is “poor” or goes “above and beyond.”

1) Contractor available 15 minutes prior to brief?

- If “NO,” valid reason? (ie – excused/base lockdown)……………................................................……………………..

2) Were all Contractor pilots in the brief?

- If “NO,” valid reason? (ie – excused/base lockdown)……………….....................................…………………………

3) If only conducting a coord brief, was the Contractor represented?

4) Contractors ready 5 minutes prior to step?

- If ‘NO’ valid reason? (ie – step early, alternate location)…………….......................................…………

5) ADAIR Flight takeoff IAW schedule (-30/+15)?

- If ‘NO’ valid reason? (ie – ATC delay, IFE inbound)………………….....................................…..…………………..

6) On station as fragged prior to vul, properly equipped and configured?

- If ‘NO,’ valid reason? (ie – IFE)…………………………………………………..........................................…………..

7) Threat presentations IAW brief and AFTTP 3-1, ATRG and/or CTRS?

8) TOT +- 1 minute or tactically valid delay?

9) >90% accuracy on declared shots IAW AFTTP 3-1?

10) >90% accuracy on declared kills IAW AFTTP 3-1?

N/A

CONTRACTOR FLIGHT DATA

Contractor C/S:_____________ Date Flown: ______________ # in Flight: _____ Base (of launch): _____________________

(Low End) (High End) � B-Course Syllabus � Ops Unit MQT � Ops Unit LFE*/Wg Exercise � USAFWC Syllabus � B-Course LFE* � CT � OT & E � Named Exercise � WIC Spin-Up* � Ops Unit FLUG/IPUG � GFR Qual’d WIC Spin-UP* Ex: ___________________

* LFE = 4 blue fighters, 4 red fighters, and 2 strikers, with certified C2 in integrated air/surface threat, with Mission CC. See PWS para

3.3.6.2.2.2. and 3.2.6.2.5. / * WIC Spin-Up: See PWS para 3.3.22.2.6.

# valid shots___ ÷ # shots taken ___ = _____ %

# valid kills ___ ÷ # kills called ___ = _____ %

# valid pres_____ ÷ # pres _____ = _____%

BLUE 1 Comments Contractor Flight Lead / Site Lead Comments

BLUE 1

Validation

Yes No

Contractor Flt Lead Concur?

Yes No

11) Contractor punish blue mistakes accordingly?

12) Kill remove IAW ROE…………………………………………………………………….……………………………………

13) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d airborne corrected immediately?

- If “NO,” describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Imact:

14) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d airborne reported in debrief?

- If “NO,” describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Impact:

15) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d in debrief appropriately addressed?

- If “NO,” describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Impact:

16) Contractors available 15 minutes prior to mass debrief?

- If “No,” valid reason? (ie – excused, ATC delays)……………………………………………………………………..

17) Video cued for debrief?

18) Ready to validate execution?

19) Did Contractor maintain air discipline?

20) Did Contractor performance support an effective blue air mission?

COMMENTS: If “NO” to any of the above, provide comments (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NEEDED):

BLUE 1 VALIDATION

Blue 1 C/S: ______________________

Name: _________________________

Signature: ______________________

Blue 1 Validation: I validate contractor’s performance on this evaluation is accurate.

CONTRACTOR CONCURRENCE

Ctr Site Lead:____________________

Signature: ______________________

Contractor Concurrence (Check One):

Concurs w/ Blue 1 Feedback

Does NOT concur

Consider total effects of items #1-19 above. If marking “no” to this question, consider the need to complete a SNP (Red Air) Gradesheet and/or an AFTO Form 781 ‘NEPT - Support’ write-up per the RTMs.

GFR MISSION EFFECTIVENESS

GFR:_________________________

Signature: ____________________

Did CTR performance support an effective blue air mission?

Yes NO

Supporting Documents Attached

Supporting Documents Attached