Appendix_N_-_CAF_CAS_Blue_1_and_Mission_Lead_Evaluation.pdf

BLUE 1

Validation

Yes No

Contractor Flt

Lead Concur?

Yes No

CAF ADAIR “BLUE 1” CONTRACTOR EVALUATION

INSTRUCTIONS: This evaluation supports AMIC’s Program Management on the CAF ADAIR Contract. This form is filled out by the Contractor Flight Lead, for the entire formation, during the debrief. Blue 1 must validate all responses and Contractor Flight Lead Concur/Non-Concur with Blue 1’s validation. Then Contrator Site Lead concurs/does not concur and provides the completed, signed form to the GFR. This Evaluation form becomes UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO whenever data is inserted.

This form is an integral part of the contract surveillance program. Data collected here is utilized in both Program Management Reviews and Award Fee Boards for program oversight. This form is designed to be user friendly, and expeditious day-to-day. Firewall “Yes” answers equates to contractor meeting performance requirements and should be the norm. A “No” answer doesn’t mean failure to perform unless there was negative consequences to the blue formation and/or blue training. Blue Flight Leads are encouraged to provide subjective feedback whenever contractor performance is “poor” or goes “above and beyond.”

1) Contractor available 15 minutes prior to brief?

- If “NO,” valid reason? (ie – excused/base lockdown)……………................................................……………………..

2) Were all Contractor pilots in the brief?

- If “NO,” valid reason? (ie – excused/base lockdown)……………….....................................…………………………

3) If only conducting a coord brief, was the Contractor represented?

4) Contractors ready 5 minutes prior to step?

- If ‘NO’ valid reason? (ie – step early, alternate location)…………….......................................…………

5) ADAIR Flight takeoff IAW schedule (-30/+15)?

- If ‘NO’ valid reason? (ie – ATC delay, IFE inbound)………………….....................................…..…………………..

6) On station as fragged prior to vul, properly equipped and configured?

- If ‘NO,’ valid reason? (ie – IFE)…………………………………………………..........................................…………..

7) Threat presentations IAW brief and AFTTP 3-1, ATRG and/or CTRS?

8) TOT +/- 1 minute or tactically valid delay?

9) >90% accuracy on declared shots IAW AFTTP 3-1?

10) >90% accuracy on declared kills IAW AFTTP 3-1?

N/A

CONTRACTOR FLIGHT DATA

Contractor C/S:_____________ Date Flown: ______________

# in Flight: _____ Base (of launch): _____________________

(Low End) (High End)

B-Course Syllabus Ops Unit MQT Ops Unit LFE*/Wg Exercise USAFWC Syllabus

B-Course LFE* CT OT & E Named Exercise WIC Spin-Up*

Ops Unit FLUG/IPUG GFR Qual’d WIC Spin-UP* Ex: ___________________

* LFE = 4 blue fighters, 4 red fighters, and 2 strikers, with certified C2 in integrated air/surface threat, with Mission CC. See PWS para

3.3.6.2.2.2. and 3.2.6.2.5. / * WIC Spin-Up: See PWS para 3.3.22.2.6.

# valid shots___ ÷ # shots taken ___ = _____ %

# valid kills ___ ÷ # kills called ___ = _____ %

# valid pres_____ ÷ # pres _____ = _____%

BLUE 1 Comments Contractor Flight Lead / Site Lead Comments

BLUE 1

Yes No

Contractor Flt

Lead Concur?

11) Contractor punish blue mistakes accordingly?

12) Kill remove IAW ROE…………………………………………………………………….……………………………………

13) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d airborne corrected immediately?

- If “NO,” describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Imact:

14) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d airborne reported in debrief?

- If “NO,” describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Impact:

15) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d in debrief appropriately addressed?

- If “NO,” describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Impact:

16) Contractors available 15 minutes prior to mass debrief?

- If “No,” valid reason? (ie – excused, ATC delays)……………………………………………………………………..

17) Video cued for debrief?

18) Ready to validate execution?

19) Did Contractor maintain air discipline?

20) Did Contractor performance support an effective blue air mission?

COMMENTS: If “NO” to any of the above, provide comments (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NEEDED):

BLUE 1 VALIDATION

Blue 1 C/S: ______________________

Name: _________________________

Signature: ______________________

Blue 1 Validation: I validate contractor’s performance on this evaluation is accurate.

CONTRACTOR CONCURRENCE

Ctr Site Lead:____________________

Signature: ______________________

Contractor Concurrence (Check One):

Concurs w/ Blue 1 Evaluation

Does NOT concur

Consider total effects of items #1-19 above. If marking “no” to this question, consider the need to complete a SNP (Red Air) Gradesheet and/or an AFTO Form 781 ‘NEPT - Support’ write-up per the RTMs.

GFR MISSION EFFECTIVENESS

GFR:_________________________

Signature: ____________________

Did CTR performance support an effective blue air mission?

Yes NO

Supporting

Documents

Attached

Mission Lead

Validation

Yes No

Contractor Lead

Concur?

Yes No

CAF Contracted Close Air Support “Mission Lead”

CONTRACTOR EVALUATION

INSTRUCTIONS: This evaluation supports AMIC’s Program Management on the Contracted Air Operations (CAO) Contract. This form is filled out by the Contractor

Flight Lead, for the entire formation, after the debrief. The mission lead must validate all responses and Contractor Flight Lead Concur/Non-Concur with the Mission Lead’s validation. The Contrator Site Lead concurs/does not concur and provides the signed form to the GFR. This Evaluation form becomes UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO whenever data is inserted.

This form is an integral part of the contract surveillance program. Data collected here is utilized in both Program Management Reviews and Award Fee Boards for program oversight. This form is designed to be user friendly, and expeditious day-to-day. Firewall “Yes” answers equates to contractor meeting performance requirements and should be the norm. A “No” answer doesn’t mean failure to perform unless there was negative consequences to the JTAC/TACP and/or JTAC training. JTAC Mission Leads are encouraged to provide subjective feedback whenever contractor performance is “poor” or goes “above and beyond.”

1) Contractor available prior to brief?

- If “NO,” valid reason? (ie – excused/base lockdown)……………................................................……………………..

2) Were all Contractor pilots in the brief?

- If ‘NO’, valid reason? (ie – excused/dislocated)……………….....................................………………….……………

3) If only conducting a coord brief, was the Contractor represented?

4) On station/check-in as fragged prior to vul (proper config/equipment)?

- If ‘NO,’ valid reason? (ie – IFE, Mx, ATC)…………………………………………………

5) Scenario execution IAW brief/Mission Lead/Instructor inputs?

- If ‘NO’, valid reasons? (ie-wx, comm, IFE)……………………………..……………………………………………..

6) CAS execution IAW JP 3-09.3, JFIRE, SPINS?

- If ‘NO”, valid reasons?

7) >85% valid attacks IAW AFTTP 3-1 and on-time (per JP3-09.3)?

- If ‘NO’, valid reasons?

8) 100% weapons on correct target and on-time (per JP 3-09.3)?

- If ‘NO’, valid reasons? (ie – JTAC talk-on to wrong target)……………………

CONTRACTOR FLIGHT DATA

Contractor C/S:_____________ Date Flown: ______________

# in Flight: _____ Base (of launch): _____________________

(Low End) (High End)

JTACQC CT Combined Live Fire Ex WIC Syllabus

Ops Unit MQT OT & E Named Exercise/GF-E/GF-W/JRTC/NTC WIC Spin-Up

Ops Unit JTAC-I Upgrade Exercise: ___________________

# attacks ___ ÷ # valid attacks ___ = _____ %

# live deliveries ___ ÷ # live deliveries on target ___ = _____ %

Mission Lead Comments Contractor Lead / Site Lead Comments

Mission Lead

Yes No

Contractor Lead

Concur?

9) Were Contractor TR violations ID’d and corrected immediately?

- If ‘NO’, describe violation(s): Callsign/Violation/Imact:……………………………………………………………….

10) Contractors available for debrief?

- If “No,” valid reason? (ie – excused, dislocated, ATC delays)………………………………………………………….

11) Contractors pepared for debrief?

12) Ready to validate execution?

13) If mission was cancelled/delayed, did contractor contact Mission Lead ASAP?

- If ‘NO’, valid reason?

13) Did Contractor performance support an effective mission?

COMMENTS: If “NO” to any of the above, provide comments (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NEEDED):

MISSION LEAD VALIDATION C/S:

Name: _________________________

Signature: ______________________

Blue 1 Validation: I validate contractor’s performance on this evaluation is accurate.

CONTRACTOR CONCURRENCE

Ctr Site Lead:____________________

Signature: ______________________

Contractor Concurrence (Check One):

Concurs w/ JTAC Mission Lead Evaluation

Does NOT concur

GFR MISSION EFFECTIVENESS

GFR:_________________________

Signature: ____________________

Did CTR performance support an effective blue air mission?

Yes NO

Consider total effects of items #1-12 above. If marking “no” to this question, consider the need to complete a SNP (Support) Gradesheet and/or a “non-effective” TACTICS log per the RJP.