Solicitation Amendment FA462020R00020004 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

1 9

0004 4/23/2020 A004848 FA462020R0002

FA4620

FA4620 92 CONS LGC

110 W ENT ST STE 200

ADMINISTRATIVE ONLY NO REQUISITIONS

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA 99011-5320

United States HEATHER ROGERS, Telephone: 657-4871 Email: heather.rogers.9@us.af.mil

FA462020R0002

3/26/2020

See Section G

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Answer additional Seed Project questions from vendors.

2. Update Attch 1.3 SOW from 17 April 2020 version to 22 April 2020 version.

Contracting Officer Email: richard.hedrick.2@us.af.mil Telephone: (509)247-4867

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section C - Specification/SOW/SOO/ORD

The Requirements text has been modified to:

Question #77: Attch_1.2_Price_Schedule reflects a single bid item CLIN 0001. Per SOW Paragraph 2, item 1a, states, Asbestos Containing Materials, including Pipe Insulation, Pipe Joints (including elbows and tees), Door Sealant and Cement Board CLIN Item 0002): 1500 SF. According to TAB A, Page 20 of 59, states, A Hazardous Materials Inspection report was conducted by Fulcrum Environmental Consulting, Spokane, WA dated April 26, 2018. The Scope of work was limited to Asbestos Containing Materials and Lead Containing Materials. Asbestos was not found on the site, but LBP was found. Are we to assume there will be a revised bid schedule to include CLIN 0002?

Answer #77: No, there will not be a revised Attch 1.2 Price Schedule based on the information provided Fulcrum Environmental Report dated April 26,2018. Please see updated SOW dated 22 April 2020.

Question #78: Attachment 1.3 SOW 4.5 D and F, requires repairs or replacement to the existing roof and wall panels. Since the contractor was not able to do a site visit and examine the roof and wall conditions, please provide for bidding purposes:

Answer #78:Please see updated SOW dated 22 April 2020.

BACKGROUND: TAB_1A_Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan: Restrooms Question #85:

CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding each restroom requires lockers please CLARIFY how many lockers are required in each restroom. Additionally, are lockers to be purchased and installed under construction /building funding OR a separate FandE Budget as an additive feature?

BACKGROUND: Mezzanine above administrative/support spaces Question #81: CLARIFICATION: What are the design loads needed at the mezzanine? Please include BOTH dead loads and live loads in the response.

Answer #81:Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

BACKGROUND: TAB_1A_Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan: Restrooms Question #83: CLARIFICATION: Please CONFIRM ADA/ABA accessible requirements for each restroom.

Answer #83:ADA compliance not required Answer #85:Lockers will be purchased and install separately apart from construction funding BACKGROUND: TAB_1A_Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan Question #86: CLARIFICATION: Are canopies of ANY type required over any of the doors exiting the building from either the supports spaces OR the main hangar bay?

Answer #86:Canopies not mentioned/required per Tab A Planning Charette Report BACKGROUND: TAB A, Planning Charette Report: Comparative Analysis and Floor Slab - Servicing Areas PDF Page count 50 of 59.

Question #87: CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please CLARIFY under Floor Slab -Servicing Areas READS: Raise Floor OR level floor and provide positive pressurization. This seems to indicate that bidders have the option to NOT install elevated finish floors at 18 inches above the Hangar floor and can propose a design that uses mechanical positive air pressure in lieu of elevated floor construction. Is this accurate and true?

Answer #87:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with the UFC and NFPA 409 BACKGROUND: TAB A, Planning Charette Report: Comparative Analysis and Exterior Walls PDF Page count 50 of 59.

Question #88: CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please CLARIFY under ISSUES and Exterior Walls READS: 10 ft. high CMU walls perimeter of the aircraft Maintenance Bay and under REQUIRED

FA462020R00020004

READS: New Walls are Required. If the support spaces are constructed 18 inches above the finish floor of the Maintenance Bay and are themselves defined by 10 ft-0 inches high CMU walls around their perimeter that the support spaces CMU walls will be 18 taller (higher) than the adjoining CMU walls around the Maintenance Bay. Please CONFIRM this is an acceptable outcome!

Answer #88:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with the UFC and NFPA 409 BACKGROUND: TAB A, Planning Charette Report: Comparative Analysis and Exterior Walls PDF Page count 50 of 59.

Question #89: CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please CLARIFY under ISSUES and Exterior Walls READS: 10 ft. high CMU walls perimeter of the aircraft Maintenance Bay and under REQUIRED READS: New Walls are Required. For equal bidding please CLARIFY and CONFIRM that exterior walls about the support/administrative spaces need NOT also go to 10ft -0 inches above the adjacent finish floor.

Answer #89:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with the UFC and NFPA 409.

Question #91: Reference the new security gate shown on TAB A2 Site Plan: Does this gate need to be crash rated?

Answer #91:Gate must comply with the UFC.

Question #92: Are any temporary containment procedures required for containment of the foam water solution during High Expansion Foam (HEF) system acceptance testing?

Answer #92:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with the UFC and NFPA Question #93: Are we to provide lockers in the mens and womens rooms?

Answer #93:No; Lockers will be purchased and install separately apart from construction funding Question #94: Is it intended to have a usable mezzanine space above the support facilities?

Answer #94:Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #97: Please confirm which edition of the UFC 4-010-01 Antiterrorism Force protection Standard is to be considered for use? The latest edition would be 12 December 2018. Is this the document to be utilized? a.

Glazing requirement for windows and daylight translucent panels being considered. b. Door openings at exterior wall would swing out c. No strengthening or hardening of shell.

Answer #97:Yes, must comply with the latest UFC and NFPA. However, daylighting is not required within the aircraft maintenance bay area.

Question #100: Plans shows stairs on each side of aircraft space near support spaces. What is the use of these?

Answer #100:Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #102: Is a mezzanine intended for above the support spaces adjacent to aircraft hangar?

Answer #102: Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #103: If a floor level is intended to be above the support spaces - what is the intention / use of it? Storage, Office Area? Design loading considerations of storage vs office space and thus cost impacts. If office space to be above - Exit calculations may require an additional stair above CTK Cell room side as travel distances and occupant load will dictate.

Answer #103: Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #104: Confirm to what level ABA is to be required? Floors of Support rooms are 18 inches off of hangar floor. Stair access from hangar floor to support spaces cannot be considered. Ramps to be considered. Only portions may be met, as ramp configuration for ABA would need to be 18 ft in length to comply. Ramp access into building support spaces from exterior? Exterior access into building to Comply with

ABA. If office build out is intended to be above support spaces - ABA to be considered? Accessible Route.

Restrooms - ABA to be considered? Accessible Route?

Answer #104: ABA/ADA compliance not required.

Question #109: In 1.3 SOW paragraph 4.5.D it states to Repair existing exterior CMU low walls extended up to the eave line in accordance with comparative analysis of TAB A. TAB A analysis of Exterior Walls (p. 50) states that for a Fuel Cell 10ft high CMU walls are required at the perimeter exterior of the Aircraft Maintenance Bay and that the existing condition is CMU walls 54 1/2 inches high with corrugated metal panels above on steel framing and that New walls are required per UFC 4-211-01 - 3-3.2.3. Will the exterior 54 1/2 inches CMU walls need to be raised to 10ft for this proposal?

Answer #109:The new 10-ft interior wall, which separates aircraft from support facilities, is separated/adjacent to the exisiting, exterior 54 1/2 inches CMU walls Question #110: TAB A Planning Charette Report in the Structural section (p. 44) states that Structural scope on this project will also include design of independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, and the structure of associated steel handrails and stairs. TAB A1 - Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan also shows three sets of stairs that appear to be leading to this referenced mezzanine, but no mention is made of it in the drawing. Is the structural mezzanine and associated stairs required for this project and if so what will the loading requirements and other design parameters be?

Answer #110:Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #111: In 1.3 SOW paragraph 4.5.B it requires a separate Fire Protection Equipment Room with direct exterior access and lists all of the components to be contained in the room and that proposed location is indicated on TAB A.1. On TAB A.1 there is an area designated as F. PUMP and EQUIP in the PLUMBING ROOM this space will not meet the requirements of the equipment called out and does not have direct exterior access. Is this space what is intended for the Fire Protection Equipment Room or can as much area as needed of the PLUMBING ROOM be used and does it still require a direct exterior access?

Answer #111: This is an 100% D/B Project; Tab A.1 Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan only provide a notional concept for vendors to develop/design.

Question #112: 1.3 SOW paragraph 4.5.E requires upgrading of existing northern and western wall near Bldg 2036 to 2-hour rated separation in accordance with comparative analysis of TAB A. TAB A comparative analysis (p. 49) states that if the setback is less than 30 feet a 2 hour exterior wall separation is required. The existing condition states that building B2036 is less than 60 feet from B1007 so requires the 2 hour separation wall while TAB A2 Site Plan Map shows that there is more than 30 feet separation between the buildings. Is the 2 hour fire separation required and if so what are the exact limits of this 2 hour rated wall as the building has multiple north and west facing walls in that area?

Answer #112:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with the UFC and NFPA 411.

Question #114: TAB A2 Site Plan shows a new security gate installed in the existing fence for the new asphalt paving tug route. What security controls are required for operation of this gate?

Answer #114:Must comply with UFC 4-010-1.

Question #117: The RFP Option 3A floor plan note #12 says to demolish existing panel boards and provide a new 1600 amp main switchboard with (2) new 400 A panelboards. The building currently is fed from two different utility transformers (one 480V and one 208V) is the intent to only have one 1600A 480V service (since only one new switchboard is called out) which will have a step down transformer inside the building to serve the 208V loads from one of the new 400A panelboards? Therefore, the 208V transformer will no longer be needed?

Answer #117:This is a 100% D/B project; voltage is determined by design based on required equipment (hangar door, fire suppression systems, etc.); refer to UFC, NFPA, Tab D Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control /Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Question #118: Reference Attachment 7 Fairchild AFB 2018 Base Design Standards: Division 04 - Masonry, paragraph B. states, When developing specifications for this section, use the Fairchild Base Design Standards sectional information developed by the 92nd Civil Engineer Squadron Engineering Flight. (other sections state this as well). Please provide the Fairchild Base Design Standards sectional information developed by the 92nd Civil Engineer Squadron Engineering Flight.

Answer #118:The mentioned sectional information refers to the subsequent Section 042000 - Unit Masonry (page 180/409 of BDS) Question #119: Reference Attachment 1.3 SOW: Section 2.0 paragraph A directs us to assume for bidding purposes 1500 SF of Asbestos Containing Materials, including pipe insulation, pipe joints, door sealant and cement board. Costs for abatement of these items will vary. Please clarify quantities of ACM for each of these items, to be used for bidding purposes.

Answer #119:Based on the information provided Fulcrum Environmental Report dated April 26,2018. Please see updated SOW dated 22 April 2020.

Question #121: Is existing and new structural steel to be cleaned, prepped and painted? In comparison photos of fuel cell maintenance facility in Bangor, all exposed structural steel was prepped and painted.

Answer #121:Must comply with UFC and Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility.

Question #124: What type of flooring does the user want in the support facilities? Wet areas, (mens and womens restrooms will receive ceramic tile) I didnt see anything on the specs for the garage doors. Did I overlook something? Or, do I need to site visit to confirm measurements?

Answer #124:This is a 100% D/B Project; surfaces must comply with UFC and BDS.

Question #127: Are there any specific space/room requirements for the new support spaces available that need to be considered in the design? (i.e. power/data requirements, etc.)

Answer #127:This is a 100% D/B Project; refer to Tab A. Planning Charette Report BACKGROUND: TAB A1, Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan reflects approved space adjacencies, and when compared to the Adjacency requirements in Tab D Corrosion Control Fuel Cell Mx Hangar Facility Standard Design, they differ form that in Tab A1.

Question #129: CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please CLARIFY if the Tab A1 Floor plan is schematic and if it is the contractors responsibility to adjust the reflected layout to conform the Tab D Facility Standard Design.

Answer #129: This is an 100% D/B Project; Tab A.1 Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan only provide a notional concept for vendors to develop/design.

BACKGROUND: TAB A, Planning Charette Report: Comparative Analysis and Fuel spill containment PDF Page count 50 of 59.

Question #130 :CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please CLARIFY under ISSUES and Fuel spill containment READS: 10 ft. high CMU walls perimeter of the aircraft Maintenance Bay and under REQUIRED READS: Not required as FAFB has other procedures for cleaning up spills. There is no reference to trench drain containment for Hi-Ex foam discharge. For equal bidding please CLARIFY and CONFIRM Whether a containment trench drain is required along the length of the south hanger doors, and please provide FAFB design criteria for the trench construction.

Answer #130:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with the UFC and NFPA.

BACKGROUND: Hanger Doors - There is no reference to the required work at the hanger doors, other than repair of the Door Roller assemblies and providing insulation.

Question #132: CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please CLARIFY. What is the existing conditioning of the weather stripping, gasketing, brushes at the each of the panels? Is there a requirement to replace repair any portion of these items/ and if so, please quantify?

Answer #132: Refer to Tab A. Planning Charette Report.

Question #133: Is there a required air infiltration improvement where pre and post testing to determine the level of improvement, achieved by corrective effort?

Answer #133: Refer to UFC, BDS, and Tab D. Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility.

Question #150: Follow up questions to responses regarding pricing requirement to be included on the CD at time of submission.

a. Will the Government permit contractors to submit in hard copy format by handwriting pricing on Attachment

1.2 and Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices/Cost Pricing Schedule along with the CDs at time of submission?

b. Or, will the Government allow contractors to upload their proposals via AMRDEC SAFE by the due date and time so that contractors are able to provide competitive pricing?

Answer #150: Proposals are to be submitted as instructed in Section L. Pricing shall be submitted on Attch

1.2. The Government will not permit contractors to submit hard copy documents. Section L states for 2 copies of CDs to be submitted by due date of proposals, Proposals submitted through anything other than instructed in Section L, to include AMRDEC SAFE will be considered non responsive.

Question #156: SUBJECT: (2) Hour Wall; Course of Action 3A Floor Plan

h. QUESTION/VARIFY: Please VERIFY that the thickened dashed line running along the north wall adjacent to CTK, Cell Room, and Comp Room then turning North along and around the COMM and ELECT room terminating at the Roll Up door defines the Limits of the Exterior 2 Hour Wall. NOTE there is no legend or arrow connecting the words 2 Hour Wall to that graphic depiction of the dashed thickened line.

Answer #156: This is a 100% D/B project; Tab A and A1 are notional concept Question #157: SUBJECT: Existing Exterior Doors

i. VERIFY/CONFIRM: that the (2) Existing Exterior Doors located at the Breakroom and the Exit Corridor adjacent to the CTK Room, Cell Room, and COMP Room has an existing threshold at the Maintenance Bay Finish Floor level and that since support spaces are now to be eighteen Inches (18 inches) above the Maintenance Bay Finish Floor these doors and door frames will have to be modified and raised a minimum of eighteen inches (18 inches) higher than their current locations.

Answer #157: This is a 100% D/B project; Tab A and A1 are notional concept.

Question #159: SUBJECT: Epoxy Flooring; Course of Action 3A Floor Plan

k. CLARIFY/CONFIRM: There is a General Note placed within the Maintenance Bay that READS: New Epoxy Coating added to Existing Concrete Floor: CLARIFY there are numerous types and application methods to installing an Epoxy Floor to an existing concrete slab Please CLARIFY the Type of Epoxy Coating required;

as an example a 3 -Part or 5-Part epoxy coating application.

Answer #159: This is a 100% D/B project; Tab A and A1 are notional concept Question #160: SUBJECT: Existing Roof Trusses

a. VERIFY/CONFIRM Since limited information is available/provided pertaining to the design of the existing roof trusses and the in person preproposal site visit was not possible can the Government please VERIFY that the spacing of roofing framing elements is at 21 ft-8 in as they scale on the Course of Action 3A Floor Plan?

Answer #160: Assume Tab A1 is accurate Question #161: Is there an available list of equipment going into CKT, Cell room and Comp room? Equipment Schedule and layout locations?

Answer #161: No, there is not a list of equipment.

Question #162: Appendix-A 12 Electrical indicates New 1600A Main Switchboard - Please advise voltage required 480V or 208V?

Answer #162: This is a 100% D/B project; voltage is determined by design based on required equipment (hangar door, fire suppression systems, etc.); refer to UFC, NFPA, Tab D Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Question #163: Documents indicate (2) transformers exist 480V and 208V 3-phase - Please advise if we are to provide Service Entrance Equipment from each and what size (in amperage)?

Answer #163:This is a 100% D/B project; voltage is determined by design based on required equipment (hangar door, fire suppression systems, etc.); refer to UFC, NFPA, Tab D Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control /Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Question #164: Please define areas for classifications - Hazardous and Non-Hazardous locations?

Answer #164:This is a 100% D/B project; refer to UFC 4-211-01.

Question #165: Documents indicate to convert existing manually operated hanger doors into electric powered operated, what about the roll-up doors? If the roll-up doors are to be converted to electric powered are they to be tied to the fire alarm system?

Answer #165:No electric conversion of roll-up doors per Tab A.

Question #168: SOW section 4.3 paragraph A item #01 states the existing 16 inch water main shall be the point of connection for new water service to the hangar; TAB A.4 Utility Plan does not show a 16 inch main, does it exist?

Answer #168:Confirmd; 16 inch water main does in fact run parallel along west face of B1007 Question #170: Page 19 of the Planning Charette Report refers to Table 1-1 of UFC 1-200-02 to determine if third-party certification is required for High Performance and Sustainable Building. Per that table this project would require third-party certification, such as LEED. The UFC allows for a number of third-party systems including: Green Globes, LEED, and Living Building Challenge.

a. Please confirm that third-party certification is to be included in the scope of this project, and if so, please confirm that any of the acceptable systems will be allowed on this project.

b. If there is a specific system required, please clarify the required certification level for that system.

Answer #170:Per UFC 1-200-02, para 4-2.2, \1\Existing building assessment is detailed in Chapter 3. \4\Code an existing building meeting the HPSB Guiding Principles (all Required and 40% of Additional elements) as Yes (1) Question #171: Questions pertaining to the mezzanine:

a. Are all areas above the new support spaces included in the mezzanine? If not, please clarify the required minimum area for the mezzanine.

b. Please confirm that the mezzanine deck is to be a steel and concrete deck.

c. Please clarify the intended use of the mezzanine.

d. Will the mezzanine be used for storage?

Answer #171:Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #181: Site plan questions. The site plan provided lacks graphics to indicate what paving is to remain and what is replaced or is new. Please provide clarification/details.

Answer #181:Per Tab A Planning Charette Report (Page 21/59), Project does not include any airfield pavement repair beyond work necessary for adding fire hydrants at Hangar 1007 per UFC 4-211-01.

Question #182: Given this hangar is used by active duty maintenance personnel, will ABA accessibility standards be required in the design? This criteria can add a lot of costs for no apparent reason.

Answer#182:ABA/ADA compliance not required.

Question #183: Fire code exiting on hangar doors: Can exiting be accomplished via new doors installed in the hangar bay doors?

Answer #183: This is a 100% D/B project.

Question #184: Mezzanine clarification: The size and load capacity of the mezzanine is not indicated in the design documents. Please provide necessary information so that we can include correct mezzanine costs in our proposal.

Answer #184: Per Tab A. Planning Charette Report (page 44/59), independent masonry walls supporting a steel and concrete deck framed mezzanine, along with associated steel handrails and stairs, are required. Available space can be used for excess Plumbing, HVAC, electrical, communications, fire suppression equipment, per comparative analysis (page 49/59). Loads must comply with UFC and NFPA.

Question #186: TAB A states it appears that 480V power is no longer fed into the hangar. Is there a functional raceway into the hangar?

Answer#186: Assume no functional raceway.

Question #191: Regarding the Overhead Rails for Fall Protection: What are the required Areas of Coverage?

(Fuselage, Wings, Stabilizers ) Answer#191:This is a 100% D/B project; Refer to UFC, NFPA, and Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control /Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility.

Question #192: Regarding the Overhead Rails for Fall Protection: Required Number of Simultaneous Users Per Coverage Area. Is there 480 Volt 50 Amp three phase power available?

Answer#192: This is a 100% D/B project; voltage is determined by design based on required equipment (hangar door, fire suppression systems, etc.); refer to UFC, NFPA, Tab D Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control /Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility.

Question #194: The concept site plan shown in Tab 4A indicates an existing 12 inch water main on the West side of Building #1007 while the virtual site video and Section 4.3.A.1 of the Statement of Work indicates a 16 inch main. Please clarify the correct main size on the West side of Building #1007.

Answer#194:Confirmed; 16 inch water main does in fact run parallel along west face of B1007.

Question #195: The Planning Charette Report indicates that Building #1007 will also need to meet the specific fire separation and egress requirements of UFC 4-211-01. Paragraph 3.0 of the Statement of Work states to bring Building #1007 into compliance with fire protection and life safety codes insofar as practicable. The Request for Proposal documents do not specifically indicate that the Fire Protection Life Safety Design Analysis required by UFC 3-600-01 is to be performed, in which all facets of fire protection and life safety are evaluated for conformance. Is it the intent to evaluate all facets of fire protection / life safety or only address specific items? What determines as far as practical when considering this project?

Answer#195:All facets of fire protection and life safety are to be evaluated for conformance Question #196: The Functional Adjacency Diagram paragraph contained in Section 2.4.D of the Air Force Corrosion Control / Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Standard Design document indicates the facility is to feature two separate Hangar Bays separated by a fire wall. All other Request for Proposal documentation indicates that this is a single hangar that would not have a fire wall to divide that hangar in half. Please confirm that the fire wall mentioned in this reference does not apply to this project.

Answer#196: Follow Tab A.1 Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan notional concept with single aircraft hanger; however, per Tab A. Planning Charette Report, Comparative Analysis (page 49/59), north/west wall near B2036 must be upgraded to 2-hr rating, while support spaces require a 1-hour rated separation from the hangar area by a CMU wall a minimum of 10 feet high as well as being raised above the floor of the hangar a minimum of eighteen inches. Must comply with specific fire separation of UFC 4-211-01.

Question #204: AsBuilt drawing sheet A-1 has a note stating, Exterior walls: CMU walls to 54-1/2 inches high with cement fiber panels above to roof line. AsBuilt drawing sheets A-2, A-3, A-4 have notes throughout indicating corrugated metal siding. Throughout other RFP documents, the siding is referred to as metal siding. The video appears to show original 1950s cement fiber panels. Repairing cement fiber panels and replacing them would be very different from repairing/replacing metal panels. Please clarify whether exterior wall panels are metal or cement fiber. If they are original cement fiber panels from the 1950s, have they been tested for asbestos content?

Answer#204: Exterior wall panels are metal.

Question #205: Tab A Planning Charrette Report, Page 13 of 59: Requirements for Correction of Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Deficiencies under Remarks states Improvements to the hangar shall be designed to be ADA compliant. However, Option 3A Floor Plan provides no provision/location for ramps or stairs outside of the aircraft clearance line to Admin areas. Tab A, Page 33 of 59 requires raising the floor of the support facilities eighteen inches above the hangar floor. Attachment 6 states Provisions for the physically handicapped will be included in this design in accordance with the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) FED-STD-795 to the maximum extent possible. Are ABA/ADA compliant alterations in this facility considered to be technically infeasible, or shall ramps be provided between the aircraft clearance line and the Admin areas, as well as all locations where stairs are shown, to be ABA/ADA compliant?

Answer#205:This is a 100% D/B project; ABA/ADA compliance not required.

Question #208: Other than the hangar floor receiving epoxy coating and the restrooms receiving tile, what floor coverings if any will be required in the support spaces and eye wash station areas?

Answer#208:This is a 100% D/B project; must comply with UFC, BDS, and Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility.

Question #210: Please clarify the new height of the exterior CMU walls. SOW states the low walls are to be extended up to the eave line (approx. 30 ft), but Tab A Charette states the low walls are to be extended up to 10 ft.

Answer#210:The new 10-ft interior wall, which separates aircraft from support facilities, is separated/adjacent to the existing, exterior 54 1/2 inch CMU walls Question #211: What is the height of the existing purlins above the exterior low CMU walls? If it is below 10 ft it will need to be relocated to accommodate the new CMU wall.

Answer#211:Refer to Tab A.5 As-Built Drawing Submittal.

Question #212: Please confirm the existing and new CMU exterior walls will need to be grout filled to meet the 2hr fire rating.

Answer#212: Yes; per Tab A. Planning Charette Report, Comparative Analysis (page 49/59), north/west wall near B2036 must be upgraded to 2-hr rating, while support spaces require a 1-hour rated separation from the hangar area by a CMU wall a minimum of 10 feet high as well as being raised above the floor of the hangar a minimum of eighteen inches. Must comply with specific fire separation of UFC 4-211-01.

Question #218: Please confirm we are building to the Fuel Shop standards rather than the Corrosion Control standards for restroom areas.

Answer#218:Fuel Shop Standards is correct.

Section J - List of Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1. MACC Seed Project FOPR Letter as of 17 April 2020

1.2 Price Schedule

1.3 MACC Seed Project SOW as of 22 April 2020

A. TAB A - Planning Charette Report TAB A.1 - Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan TAB A.2 - Site Plan Map TAB A.3 - Elevation Model TAB A.4 - Utility Plan TAB A.5 - As-Built Drawing Submittal B. TAB B - Type A Pad Mount Oil-Insulated Switchgear Reference C. TAB C - Base Switchgear Map D. TAB D - Corrosion Control_Fuel Cell Mx Hangar Facility Standard Designs E. TAB E - Hazardous Materials Inspection Report F. TAB F - Standard Restroom Fixtures Cut Specification Reference G. TAB G - B1001, B1003, B1005 and B1007 As Built Drawings

2. Past Performance Information

3. Past Performance Cover Letter and Questionnaire

4. Subcontractor/Teaming Arrangement Release

5. MACC Orientation Seminar Task Order 0001 SOW, dated 16 January 2020

6. MACC Specifications, dated 7 January 2020

7. Fairchild AFB 2018 Base Design Standards

8. Fairchild AFB IFS 2019 G. TG. TAB G

9. Fairchild AFB Climate Weather Data

10. Wage Determinations:

A. WD WA20200017 Building - Spokane County B. WD WA20200076 Heavy (includes sewer & water) - Spokane County C. WD WA20200001 Highway - Statewide

11. Task Order Procedures

12. 2020 MACC Virtual Preproposal Site Visit/Conference - FA462020R0002