Solicitation Amendment FA462020R00020003 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

1 18

0003 4/17/2020 A004848 FA462020R0002

FA4620

FA4620 92 CONS LGC

110 W ENT ST STE 200

ADMINISTRATIVE ONLY NO REQUISITIONS

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA 99011-5320

United States HEATHER ROGERS, Email: heather.rogers.9@us.af.mil Telephone: 657-4871

FA462020R0002

3/26/2020

See Section G

SEE CONTINUATION PAGE

Contracting Officer Email: richard.hedrick.2@us.af.mil Telephone: (509)247-4867

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this solicitation amendment is to:The Purpose of This Amendment Is:

1. Extend the proposal due date from 27 April 2020 at 2:00 PM Pacific to 11 May 2020 at 2:00 PM Pacific.

2. Update Block 10 of solicitation from 1442;

-E. Enter prices on Attch 1.2 Price Schedule -K. Past Performance due date has been extended from 27 April 2020 at 2:00 PM Pacific to 11 May 2020 at 2:00PM Pacific

3. Update Attch 1.3 SOW from 28 February 2020 version to 17 April 2020 version.

4. Add TAB G B1001, B1003, B1005 and B1007 As Built Drawings to Section J and Attachment 1 Seed Project RFP

5. Answer Seed Project questions.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Contract Description

A. Project Title: MACC (Multiple Award Construction Contract) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity. \nB.

Government anticipates target of 6 awards. This acquisition is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside.\nC. All questions must be submitted NLT 10 days prior to RFP closing date.\nD. Project Performance Period: One (1) Base Year and four (4) Option Years. \nE. Enter prices on Attachment 2, Price Schedule. \nF. Bid Bond required-see Section I, FAR 52.228-1 & Section H, Para

1.19. Bonding Capacity: Single project $10M/

Aggregate $20M.\nG. Section L, “Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents” and Section M, “Evaluation Factors for Award,” for proper proposal preparation. \nH. Guaranteed minimum amount of $500.00 will be met via contractor’s participation in the MACC Orientation Seminar.

Reference Section H, Paragraph 1.1. Total aggregate maximum amount expendable under all MACC contracts awarded shall not exceed $95 million. \nI. A Pre-Proposal site visit will be conducted virtually. In addition to the Seed Project documents listed in Section J, Attachment 3, we will provide a video of the jobsite on or about 3 April 2020 via AMRDEC SAFE .

Interested parties will need to contact the POCs in Section L, 1.3 for access to the AMRDEC SAFE System.\nJ. Sections K, L, and M will not be part of any resultant contract. \nK. Past Performance is due by 27 April 2020. \nL. Magnitude of Seed Project is between $5,000,000.00 and $10,000,000.00.\nM. NAICS code is 236220 with SB size standard is $39.5M\nN. This acquisition will be a Total Small business Set-Aside to vendors with a registered Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) registration in Washington, Oregon, or Idaho.

A. Project Title: MACC (Multiple Award Construction Contract) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity. \nB.

Government anticipates target of 6 awards. This acquisition is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside.\nC. All questions must be submitted NLT 10 days prior to RFP closing date.\nD. Project Performance Period: One (1) Base Year and four (4) Option Years. \nE. Enter prices on Attch 1.2, Price Schedule. \nF. Bid Bond required-see Section I, FAR 52.228-1 & Section H, Para 1.19. Bonding Capacity: Single project $10M/ Aggregate $20M.\nG.

Section L, “Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents” and Section M, “Evaluation Factors for Award,” for proper proposal preparation. \nH.

Guaranteed minimum amount of $500.00 will be met via contractor’s participation in the MACC Orientation Seminar. Reference Section H, Paragraph 1.1. Total aggregate maximum amount expendable under all MACC contracts awarded shall not exceed $95 million. \nI. A Pre- Proposal site visit will be conducted virtually. In addition to the Seed Project documents listed in Section J, Attachment 3, we will provide a video of the jobsite on or about 3 April 2020 via AMRDEC SAFE . Interested parties will need to contact the POCs in Section L, 1.3 for access to the AMRDEC SAFE System.\nJ. Sections K, L, and M will not be part of any resultant contract. \nK. Past Performance due date has been extended from 27 April 2020 at 2:00 PM Pacific to 11 May 2020 at 2:00PM Pacific\nL. Magnitude of Seed Project is between $5,000,000.00 and $10,000,000.00.\nM. NAICS code is 236220 with SB size standard is $39.5M\nN. This acquisition will be a Total Small business Set-Aside to vendors with a registered Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) registration in Washington, Oregon, or Idaho.

Section C - Specification/SOW/SOO/ORD

The Requirements text has been modified to:

Solicitation Seed Project Questions and Answers:

Question #1: The replacement of existing roll up doors is in the SOW. I can not find dimensions for the tug door. Can you provide these dimensions?

Answer 1 Ref Tab A5 - Dimension extrapolated from as-builts - 16ft- 9in x 10ft - 3in

FA462020R00020003

Question #2: Will the contractor be following design specs that you are providing, or will the contractor be responsible for the plumbing/mechanical design as well?

Answer 2 YES; the contractor is responsible for the plumbing/mechanical design.

Question #3: Since this is a virtual site visit instead of the normal approach, will the government provide a list of attendees for participating companies?

Answer # See Amendment 0002 Answer#16 Question #4: Tab A Planning Charrette Report, Page 44/59 - The Hazardous Materials Inspection report states that the red colored paint on the interior of the facility is lead based. The Attch 1.3 SOW, Page 2, 2.0 Hazardous Materials Section, also mentions lead based paint. While all three areas show Lead based paint there is no mention of what extent this is to be removed. Are we to assume complete removal of all lead based paint (all red paint on the building structure), throughout the entire building?

Answer 4 NO; only as required to accomplish that particular aspect of work needed Question #5: The roof structure, post transition (storage to fuel cell function) will be burdened with several new loads consisting of, at a minimum, Fire Protection Piping, misc. mechanical and electrical items, as well as fall protection rails and connection points. Without field observations, and measurements how are contractors to determine the remaining capacity of the roof Structure and how much additional support will be required to address these or any new loads?

Answer 5: See Attachment 13 B1001, B1003, B1005 and B1007 As Built Drawings as a reference; fire suppression insulation projects at similar hangars require no structural modification.

Question #6: Facility exit doors articulated in the Option 3A Floor Plan indicate (3) risers at each stair indicating the adjacent interior floor elevation is 18-21 inches above grade and main floor elevation. This Option 3A Floor plan does NOT make allowances for ADA:ABA (required on page 13 of 59 PDF page count; Planning Charette) compliant access ramps at a slope of 1:12. How does the Government plan on approaching ADA accessibility into these spaces and how shall ramps be directed?

Answer #6: Not required.

Question #7: REQUEST: Can the government confirm/provide the amount of existing insulation within the building at exterior walls and the roof?

Answer #7: No existing insulation within building at exterior walls and roof.

Question #8: BACKGROUND: Tab A Planning Charette Report Tab A under Vehicular Parking reads:

Adequate Parking is within the vicinity of the hangar. Additionally, the same report in paragraph 2.1 General Description READS in part....the analysis of antiterrorism standards TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE RENOVATION will be guided by UFC 4-010-1 and that given the buildings construction standoff distances should be extended AS FAR AS IS PRACTICAL and that access control shall be implemented IF access roads, PARKING, or trash need to be closer to the building. Adequate parking is within the vicinity of the building What is the distance of the vicinity referred to?

Answer #8: Normal UFC and standard facility design for parking (occupancy, standoff, etc.)

Question #9: How is ADA access to the building being addressed?

Answer#9: Not required.

Question #10: If the Standoff distance via UFC 4-010-1 required greater separation how does a contractor bid moving parking and trash vs incorporating access control?

Answer#10:Comply with UFC and standard facility design for parking (occupancy, standoff, etc) Question #11: If access control is utilized where does it get tied into and how is the connection to be accomplished without sufficient material in the RFP or obtained during a physical site visit Answer#11: Comply with UFC and standard facility design for parking (occupancy, standoff, etc); review aerial photo.

Question #12: BACKGROUND: Tab A Planning Charette Report Tab A (page 6 of 59 PDF page count) Paragraph 2.5 Concept READS IN PART: the workspace is to be separated from the hangar with a CMU wall a minimum of 10 feet high. What substantiates the need for a 10-foot-high CMU wall; is it a certain fire rating and if so what is the reported area separation requirement in terms of an hourly rating?

Answer#12: Must comply with UFC and NFPA Question #13: If the CMU is required for an hourly separation rating, for bidding purposes (equal bids /assumptions) what is the required rating for the ceiling structure of the support spaces?

Answer#13:Must comply with UFC and NFPA

Question #14: BACKGROUND: Tab A Planning Charette Report Tab A (page 12 of 59 PDF page count) Paragraph 3.2 User and Facility Requirements under Finishes (exterior walls, interior walls, ceilings READS IN PART: The many holes in the metal panels as well as open joints between panels are to be repaired.

Damaged panels are to be replaced and painted. holes in the metal panels are to be repaired while damaged panels are to be replaced and painted Without adequate physical observation via an on-site physical visit or adequate As-Built records how are bidders (for bidding phase) to determine the amounts of area to be replaced versus the amount of surfaces to be replaced?

Answer #14: See Revised SOW dated 17 April 2020, 3. Page 6, Section 4.5 Architectural and Structural Works, F. Roof Panels Repair

a. Added 4. For bidding purposes, assume 600 small holes/punctures cross the hangar were observed.

b. Added 5. For bidding purposes, assume no more than 25ft, 10ft x 12ft panels require replacement Question #15: Holes could be argued is a form of damage. Logic would state that ALL holes are a form of damage BUT ALL damages are not holes. Who and how is it determined which panels get replaced and which panels get repaired? For the purposes of equal and fare bidding.

Answer #15: See Answer #14.

Question #16: Background: Roofing: Tab A Planning Charette Report Tab A (page 13 of 59 PDF page count) Paragraph 3.2; User and Facility Requirements under Roof READS: The existing roofing material (metal roof panels) is to remain in place. Numerous holes occur in the metal panels and these are to be patched. ...Panels beyond repair shall be replaced and painted. For the purposes of equal bidding how are Contractors to determine the amount of repair and the amount of replace to budget?

Answer #16: See Answer #14.

Question #17: Additionally, post award, who determines if a panel is too damaged to be repaired in place?

Answer#17: Following post-award, with vendors field observation and notifying CO/COR, government will determine if a panel is beyond repair Question # 18: Background: Tab A Planning and Scoping of Building B1007; Aircraft Fuel Systems Maintenance Hangar (22 May 2018) Section B project Description under Project Narrative (page 35 of 59 PDF page count) READS IN PART: The support spaces require a 1-hour rated separation from the hangar area by a concrete masonry (CMU) wall a minimum of ten feet high as well as being raised above the floor of the hangar by eighteen inches. Clarify: The mens and womans restrooms (heads) appear to be accessed from a exit corridor leading to a presumed exit that does NOT indicate (depict) an exterior stair. It is assumed that the restroom finish floor is 18 inches above the Hangar finish floor which means the presumed exit corridor is slopping upwards from the hangar finish floor to first the mens then the womens restroom. Since the resumed doors into the restroom run in parallel to the exit corridor/ramp the door threshold would slope which is NOT compliant with ADA requirements. There are landings required at each restroom.

Answer#18: This is part of the design-build process; ABA ADA compliance not required Question #19: CONFIRM; that there should be stairs at the exterior of the Exit Corridor accessing the mens and womens restroom.

Answer#19: This is part of the design-build process.

Question #20: clarify: please clarify the relationship of the Janitors room related to the same slopping exit corridor Answer#20:This is part of the design-build process.

Question #21:clarify: the relationship of the Plumbing Room and the Exit Corridor ramp.

Answer#21:This is part of the design-build process.

Question #22: is the access to the Plumbing room only from the exterior Answer #22: This is part of the design-build process.

Question #23: Per SOW, Section1B, states, During the pre-proposal site visit, MACC contractors shall visit the site and become familiar with the project requirements. Government-furnished information is not guaranteed to represent actual conditions and shall therefore be field verified prior to incorporation into the design. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure designed elements, layouts, etc. are compatible with existing site conditions. Since the site visit is a virtual video, how will the various teams be able to field verify?

Answer#24: See Answer #17 Amendment 0002 Question #25: Would the government consider scheduling a physical site visit for field verification?Answer#25:

See Answer #17 Amendment 0002

Question #32: There are references that the existing lighting has been recently replaced and no addition high bay lighting is required. There is also a performance requirement within the design standards that dictates the lighting be complaint to UFC 3-530-01. Is it assumed that we perform modeling and adjust layout and augment the existing lighting?

Answer#32:Yes.

Question #33: Is there any information regarding the existing layout and fixture specifications?

Answer#33:This is part of the design-build process.

Question #34: Question relates to the plumbing and HVAC for the project. Will the contractor be following design specs that you are providing, or will the contractor be responsible for the plumbing/mechanical design as well.

Answer#34:YES, this is part of the design-build process; the contractor is responsible for the plumbing /mechanical design.

Question #35: BACKGROUND: required exits per NFPA within the main hangar space. It can be noted within the Option 3A Floor Plan issued within the RFP that there are NO accessible exits from the main hangar space from the southernmost wall of the CTK room on the West side of the hangar and the southernmost wall of the Plumbing room on the East side of the hangar space. NOTE: All exits on the northern half of the plan can only be accessed by the support spaces behind the elevated 10 foot high CMU wall. CLARIFICATION: For purposes of equal bidding please clarify where additional exits should be located per the interpretation of NFPA per the government.

Answer#35: This is part of the design-build process.

Question #36: SUBJECT: Tab A Page 3 of the Comparative Analysis (page 50 of 59 per PDF Page Count) States for the issue Mezzanine Floor the required is 1-Hour Rated. QUESTION/CLARIFICATION: please verify that the mezzanine space is NOT enclosed and that ONLY the ceiling/floor assemble between the support spaces below the mezzanine and the mezzanine floor needs to meet the 1-Hour rating.

Answer#36:This is part of the design-build process.

Question #37: SUBJECT: Tab A Paragraph titled Structural page 2 of that section READS IN PART: Existing roof trusses: the roof trusses can support 2.2 psf added loading WITHOUT ANALYSIS (emphasis added for clarity). Again, this is very minimal BUT IS LIKELY ADEQUATE to support fire sprinklers, lighting and lightweight insulation overbuild. QUESTION/CLARIFICATION: For the purpose of bidding shall ALL contractors then assume that no strengthening of the roof is required and if so proven an incorrect assumption later on it (strengthening of the roof structure) will be added as a scope change? If not bidding contractors need more information on the roof framing system including but not limited to the gauge and types of roof trusses installed. PLEASE NOTE that the assumption above does NOT include Draft Curtain, heating elements and Lighting in the load assumptions.

Answer#37:See Attachment 13 B1001, B1003, B1005 and B1007 As Built Drawings as a reference; fire suppression insulation projects at similar hangars require no structural modification.

Question #40: SUBJECT: Spaces on the Option 3A Floor Plan. QUESTION: Are the ONLY access points to the CTK, CELL RM, and COMP via the access corridor or are there other means of access? Please NOTE the requirement of the project to meet ADA means an 18-foot-long RAMP is needed/required to access any and all spaces that are 18 inches above the Hangar floor elevation.

Answer#40:This is part of the design-build process; ABA ADA compliance not required Question #41: SUBJECT: Elevated floor spaces 18 inches above Hangar floor. QUESTION: Given that there are extensive implications related to ADA and any/all access to the elevated support spaces. Will you please explain the reason for elevating these spaces? Is it for explosion proof power outlets and lighting controls? ADA ramps are required at a 1:12 slope and will be located all around the facility in order to comply UNLESS a waiver is granted.

Answer#41:This is part of the design-build process; ABA ADA compliance not required Question #42: Attch 1.3 SOW does NOT mention the addition of windows or additional daylighting. The Tab A Planning Charrette Report, Page 41/59, Environmental - States that adding additional daylighting will enhance the working environment. In addition, the Tab A3 Elevation Model shows an elevation drawing with translucent wall panels on the hangar door side of the building. Since daylighting/translucent wall panels are NOT specifically noted on the Attch 1.3 SOW, please confirm if daylighting/translucent panels, etc. are part of the scope and confirm what the overall intent/requirements are.

Answer#42:Natural daylighting should be used to at least the same level as that shown in the concept design in order to reduce lighting and heating requirement; This is a 100% D/B project Question #43: The Tab A Planning Charrette Report, Page 46/59, shows a possible layout for the new/added Support Space within the building (with the Support Area on one side of the hangar). However, the Tab A Planning Charrette Report, Page 6/59 and the Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan show a split-layout (with the Support Space on two opposite sides of the hangar). Please confirm that the Option 3A Floor Plan (as shown on the Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan) is the layout that shall be provided by the Contractor for the seed project.

Answer#43: This is part of the design-build process.

Question #44: The Attch 1.3 SOW, Page 6/10, 4.5, D. - It appears that the Contractor is to repair damage to the metal WALL panels, please confirm that is the requirement. In addition, can the Government please provide a quantity of wall panel repairs that should be assumed for bidding purposes? This is needed, since the Contractors do not have the access/ability to visit the site for field verifications. Also, quantities of wall panel repairs cannot be determined by the virtual site visit video.

Answer #44: See Answer #14.

Question #45: The Attch 1.3 SOW,Page 6/10, 4.5, F. - The Contractor is to repair existing punctured or damaged ROOF panels. Can the Government please provide a quantity of roof panel repairs that should be assumed for bidding purposes? This is needed, since the Contractors do not have the access/ability to visit the site for field verifications. Also, quantities of roof panel repairs cannot be determined by the virtual site visit video.

Answer#45: See Answer #14.

Question #46: The Attch 1.3 SOW, Page 6/10, 4.5, D. - the Contractor is to repair damage to the CMU walls.

Can the Government please provide a quantity of CMU wall repairs that should be assumed for bidding purposes? This is needed, since the Contractors do not have the access/ability to visit the site for field verifications. Also, quantities of CMU wall repairs cannot be determined by the virtual site visit video.

Answer#46:See Revised SOW 17 April 2020, Page 6, Section 4.5 Architectural and Structural Works, D.

Exterior CMU Wall Repairs

a. Added 1. For bidding purposes, assume 100 LF of CMU Wall requires repair Question #47: The Plan A2 Site Plan Map appears to show some new site work. However the Attch 1.3 SOW does not outline any scope of work associated with site/civil work. Please confirm/itemize the required site/civil work for the Building 1007 Seed Project.

Answer#47:This is part of the design-build process.

Question #48: Does this project need to comply with Washington State Energy Code, or are there other minimum insulation value requirements we must comply with?

Answer#48:Must comply with UFC and Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Tab D Question#49: Will this building be air-tested?

Answer#49: As required for hazmat abatement.

Question#50: What are and/or where do we find the various needed Mechanical and Electrical needs for the Janitors closet i.e.: Mop Sink, Lighting, Power Outlets, etc.

Answer#50: This is a 100% D/B project; the contractor is responsible for the electrical/mechanical design.

Question#51: Is compressed air required within the facility and if so where is the compressor to be located, where are desired air drops needed and what is the system demand needs; both volume and pressures? Not mentioned specifically in Task Order, but references in UFC 4-211-01.

Answer#51:Must comply with UFC and Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Tab D Question#52: SUBJECT: HVAC System(s) Is preconditioned air required? Not mentioned specifically in Task Order, but references in UFC 4-211-01.

Answer#52: Must comply with UFC and Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Question#53:SUBJECT: Floor Drains Are drains required in CTK (tool) room or Cell Room?

Answer#53:Yes, refere to Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Question #54: Approximate number of holes in metal panels to be repaired.

Answer#54: See Answer #14.

Question#55: Open joints between panels to be repaired.

Answer#55:Yes.

Question#56: Approximate square footages of roof and wall panels damaged beyond repair that will require replacement and painting.

Answer#56: See Answer #14.

Question#58: The SOW 4.3.1 states that a 16 water main runs parallel along the west face of B1007. However, on Appendix D C101, that line is shown as 12in. Please clarify.

Answer#58: Confirmed; 16 water main does in fact run parallel along west face of B1007.

Question#59: Please confirm that the two-hour wall is only required at the locations where the block-looking line is shown on the floor plan. This appears to begin in the corner near the CTK and following to the center of the nose area.

Answer#59: This is part of the design-build process; must comply with the UFC and NFPA Question#60: Are there any fire rating requirements for the roof?

Answer#60: This is part of the design-build process; must comply with the UFC and NFPA Question#61: Page 33 of TAB A Planning Charette states that Safety features... raising the floor of the support facilities eighteen inches above the hangar floor.... On the diagrammatic plan, the stairs to the mezzanine are shown, but no ramps or stairs to the lower levels. Is the floor required to be raised 18 inches?

Answer#61: This is part of the design-build process; ABA ADA compliance not required Question#62: Does ABA apply to this facility?

Answer#62: This is part of the design-build process; ABA ADA compliance not required Question#63: Page 50 of TAB A Planning Charette states that 10 foot CMU walls are required at all exterior walls. Attachment 1.3 the SOW, states that exterior walls are to be repaired only. Please clarify.

Answer#63:See Revised SOW 17 April 2020, Page 6, Section 4.5 Architectural and Structural Works, D.

Exterior CMU Wall Repairs

a. Added 1. For bidding purposes, assume 100 LF of CMU Wall requires repair Question#65: Page 50 of TAB A Planning Charette states that windows are to be added. Due to ATFP requirements, please provide minimum square footages at each room.

Answer#65: This is part of the design-build process; must comply with the UFC, AFMAN 32-1084, Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility Question#66: Page 16 of TAB A Planning Charette states that lightening protection is required. However, this does not appear in the scope of work. Please confirm whether lightening protection is required.

Answer#66: Confirmed per Tab A PCR; Lightning protection does not exist in the current hangar and should be installed according to UFC 4-211-01. System include roof air terminals and down conductors to ground grid.

Question#67: Per UFC 4-211-02 and UFC 4-211-01, it is up to the local base to determine requirements for containment of fire suppression foam. Please confirm if this will be required as part of this project. If this is required, are there any limitations for the location of the collection tanks for the fire suppression foam?

Answer#67: Yes; must comply with the UFC and NFPA Question#69: Page 12 of TAB A Planning Charette states that, In wet areas, ceramic tile floors and walls are proposed. Is this required? What are the floor finishes in the other areas, carpet or resilient flooring?

Answer#69:Must comply with UFC and Base Design Standards Question#70: Page 12 of TAB A Planning Charette identifies several areas that are required to have acoustical tile ceilings. In the other areas will it be required to paint the bottom of the concrete pan deck and exposed utilities?

Answer#70:Must comply with UFC and Base Design Standards Question#71: What is the required ceiling height of the new interior spaces?

Answer#71:Must comply with UFC, Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility and Base Design Standards Question#72: Page 50 of TAB A Planning Charette states, Confirm existing slab is satisfactory for Fuel Cell operation. Repair expansion joints and damaged areas in preparation of applying an epoxy surface. Will the existing 0.36% slope be acceptable?

Answer#72:Must comply with UFC, Standard Design for AF Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar Facility

Question#73: Page 50 of TAB A Planning Charette states, Confirm existing slab is satisfactory for Fuel Cell operation. Repair expansion joints and damaged areas in preparation of applying an epoxy surface. Since the contractor was not able to perform a site visit, please provide square footage of concrete repair anticipated, to be used for bidding purposes.

Answer #73: See Revised SOW 17 April 2020 , 4. Page 7, Section 4.6 Flooring. There is approximately 3200 SF of concrete that requires repair.

Question#74: Page 51 in TAB A Planning Charette states that, From data provided by the Government, it has been determined that adequate water is available. However, page 36 states that, Data provided on the available water supply indicates that adequate water flow is available but a fire pump will be necessary to meet the pressure requirements. Please clarify if a fire pump is required.

Answer #74: A Fire pump is required as referenced in TAB A.4 Question #136: What is the size width x height of each of the hangar doors and the tail door opening?

Answer #136: Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal Hangar Door Leaf - 20ft x 19ft - 6in;

Tail/Tug Door - 16ft - 9in x 10ft - 3in Question #137: What is the size of the other rolling steel doors?

Answer #137: Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal Dimension - 18ft - 3in x 29ft - 9in.

Question #138: What is the frame depth of the existing doors?

Answer #138: Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal Frame Depth: 7in Question #139: What is the size of the bottom wheels?

Answer #139: Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal Wheel Radius: 4.5+/- Question #141: What is the spacing between the purlins that support the roof panels?

Answer #141: Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal Spacing between the purlins that support roof panels - 6 feet.

Question #142: Floor slab preparation requires repair of expansion joints and damaged areas in preparation of applying epoxy surface. As a walk-through was not allowed, for bidding purposes is it possible to provide assumed quantities?

Answer #142: Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal. There is approximately 3200 SF of concrete that requires repair Question #176: The replacement of existing roll up doors is in the SOW. I cant find dimensions for the tug or tail door. Can you provide these?

Answer #176:Extrapolated from TAB A.5 As Built Drawing Submittal. Dimension - 16ft- 9in x 10ft - 3in Question #177: TORFP 10. Wage determination states to use the most current for Spokane County. There will be a new wage determination in June, and we have to hold our bid until December 31 2020. What happens if the MACC is not awarded before the wage determination changes in June? Answer#177:See Amendment 0001, question 5 Question #203: Tab A Planning Charrette Report, Page 12 of 59: Finishes Remarks states, The many holes in the metal panels as well as open joints between panels are to be repaired. Damaged panels are to be replaced and painted.The term many is difficult to bid. To level the playing field, consider providing a quantifiable % or square footage of replaced materials, for example - 5% of roof panels and 5% of wall panels shall be assumed for replacement. In the event, the envelope continues to deteriorate, prior to the award of the contract, it will also help to better define quantities and reduce the risk for all parties involved.

Answer#203: See Answer #14:

Question #216: Since we were unable to visit the site ourselves and for bidding purposes, can the government quantify the amount of holes to patch and how many panel joints need to be repaired in the roof and wall panels?

Answer#216: See Answer #14 Question#255:Extent of lead abatement is also unknown and unable to be quantified as we dont know the extent of the structural modifications until engineering has been completed.

Answer#255: NO; only as needed Question #256: Is the epoxy flooring to extend into to the built out rooms, (with exception of the restrooms)?

Answer#256: No; epoxy flooring will only extend into fuel cell/mx functional areas; other surfaces must comply with UFC and BDS Question#257: Does each door need to move independently or can the system Bi part with one operator on the leading door to drive 5 panels?

Answer#257: Not required.

Question 258:It appears the leading (middle) door of each bi-part is on the inside of the stack is that correct?

Answer#258: Not required.

Question#260: An exact match of the exterior roof and wall panel profile may not exist in the current sheet metal market due to the age of the panels. Will providing a slightly mismatched panel profile be acceptable or do they all need to be replaced? Patching larger holes is a short-term fix and there is no guarantee of long-term weather tightness.

Answer#260: Panel profiles must comply with UFC, Question#261: Is there an existing geotech report that will be provided for trench compaction and pavement sections or should we include with our cost proposal?

Answer#261: No; This is a 100% D/B project Question#262:Comparative analysis of conversion of existing hangar to a fuel cell indicates that bird intrusion prevention is required is that correct?

Answer#262: This is a 100% D/B project; refer to UFC 4-21-01 - 3-3.6 Question#263: Floor slab preparation requires repair of expansion joints and damaged areas in preparation of applying epoxy surface. As a walk-through was not allowed, for bidding purposes is it possible to provide assumed quantities?

Answer#263: See revised SOW dated 17 April 2020, 4. Page 7, Section 4.6 Flooring a. Added 1. For bidding purposes, assume 3200 SF of existing concrete flooring requires repair of expansion joints and surfaces.

Question#264:Since we cannot inspect the facility and determine the quantity of wall and roof panels that will need repaired or replaced will you provide a set qty to use for proposal purposes or a unit price for this scope of work?

Answer#264: See Answer #14

Section J - List of Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1. MACC Seed Project FOPR Letter as of 17 April 2020

1.2 Price Schedule

1.3 MACC Seed Project SOW as of 17 April 2020

A. TAB A - Planning Charette Report TAB A.1 - Course of Action Option 3A Floor Plan TAB A.2 - Site Plan Map TAB A.3 - Elevation Model TAB A.4 - Utility Plan TAB A.5 - As-Built Drawing Submittal B. TAB B - Type A Pad Mount Oil-Insulated Switchgear Reference C. TAB C - Base Switchgear Map D. TAB D - Corrosion Control_Fuel Cell Mx Hangar Facility Standard Designs E. TAB E - Hazardous Materials Inspection Report F. TAB F - Standard Restroom Fixtures Cut Specification Reference G. TAB G - B1001, B1003, B1005 and B1007 As Built Drawings

2. Past Performance Information

3. Past Performance Cover Letter and Questionnaire

4. Subcontractor/Teaming Arrangement Release

5. MACC Orientation Seminar Task Order 0001 SOW, dated 16 January 2020

6. MACC Specifications, dated 7 January 2020

7. Fairchild AFB 2018 Base Design Standards

8. Fairchild AFB IFS 2019 G. TG. TAB G

9. Fairchild AFB Climate Weather Data

10. Wage Determinations:

A. WD WA20200017 Building - Spokane County B. WD WA20200076 Heavy (includes sewer & water) - Spokane County C. WD WA20200001 Highway - Statewide

11. Task Order Procedures

12. 2020 MACC Virtual Preproposal Site Visit/Conference - FA462020R0002

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1.1 Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, and representations and certifications in addition to those identified as evaluation criteria. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

1.2 This is an all-electronic solicitation release. Hard copies are not available. The Government will post amendments to the solicitation to the Electronic Posting System (EPS) at https://fbohome.sam.gov. /It is the responsibility of each offeror to review the web page for notice of amendments, updates or changes to current information.

1.3 A Pre-Proposal site visit will be conducted virtually. In addition to the Seed Project documents listed in Section J, Attachment 1, we will provide a video of the jobsite on or about 3 April 2020 via AMRDEC SAFE. Interested parties will need to contact the following POCs for access to the video:

- Heather Rogers, 92 CONS/PKB, (509) 247-4871, email heather.rogers.9@us.af.mil

- Brian Fernandez, 92 CONS/PKB, (509) 247-3859, email brian.fernandez.2@us.af.mil

- Richard Hedrick, 92 CONS/PKB, (509) 247-4867, email richard.hedrick.2@us.af.mil

Failure of a prospective offeror to submit any questions or review the virtual site visit will be construed to mean that the prospective offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is specifically amended in writing. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of any such amendment as described in contract clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors- Competitive Acquisition, of this RFP shall apply. Notice to Offerors: Offerors are encouraged to submit all questions and requests for clarifications no less than ten (10) days prior to the RFP closing date. The decision whether to respond to questions and requests for clarification made less than ten (10) days prior to the RFP closing shall be at the sole discretion of the contracting officer.

1.4 Joint Venture Offerors: If the offeror is a joint venture, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the joint venture agreement with proposal. The agreement shall include information, which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture. The joint venture must be approved by the Small Business Administration (SBA), prior to award. Joint venture agreements must be received by the Small Business Administration (SBA) prior to proposal due date and approved before award of a resulting contract. If a joint venture is contemplated, then the assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) must be advised as soon as possible. Ensure the agreement is submitted in sufficient advance to the BOS to permit adequate time for a regulatory compliance review. Any corrections and/or changes requested must permit adequate review time by the BOS before the proposal due date. No corrections and/or changes are permitted after the time for submission of offers.

1.5 Teaming/Partnering Offerors: If the offer is based on a teaming/partnering relationship, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the teaming/partnership agreement. The agreement shall include information, which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/partnering relationship.

1.6 Mentor-Protege Program Offerors: For information regarding the Small Business Administration's (SBA) Mentor-Protege Program see: http://www.sba.gov/ and CFR Title 13, Chapter 1, Part 121 and125. For information regarding the Department of Defense (DoD) Funded Mentor Protege Program see:

https://www.acq.osd.mil/

1.7 Incurred Expenses: The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

1.8 In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals and will destroy all extra copies. No destruction certificate will be provided.

1.9 All proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation.

Any commitments made in the proposal shall become a part of the resultant contract. In no case shall words like "we will comply with the requirements of the contract," or equivalent statements, be acceptable to meet the requirements of this RFP. Failure to comply with these instructions may result in the Government summarily rejecting the offeror's proposal.

1.10 The past performance proposal (Volume I) and price proposal (Volume II) shall include the documents required. The price proposal must be based on the offeror's own proposal for the seed project and the Government's specifications as set forth herein. The Government will evaluate the price proposal in accordance with Section M. Offerors must be received by this office no later than the date and time indicated in Block 14 of the most recent SF30 (Amendment).

Volume Submission Requirements:

CD/DVD I (complete proposal)

- Volume I (30 page max) - Past Performance

- Volume II (Unlimited page limit) - Price and Contract Forms

CD/DVD II (complete proposal)

- Volume I (30 page max) - Past Performance

- Volume II (Unlimited page limit) - Price and Contract Forms

Submit to address shown below--

92 CONS/PKB

ATTENTION: Heather Rogers

110 West Ent Street Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-8568

1.11 The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Therefore, only a limited amount of pricing information is required in the initial proposals. Upon examination of the initial proposals (offers), the contracting officer will review this determination. If, in the contracting officer's opinion, there is adequate price competition, no additional price information, except for final proposal revisions, if requested by the Contracting Officer, will be elicited and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1(b) applies, offerors may be required to prepare, submit, and certify cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-4.

1.12 Submitted materials will be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

Requirements of the RFP, MACC Specifications, Seed Project SOW, and CLINs contained therein; Government standards and regulations pertaining to the Seed Project SOW; and evaluation criteria for award in Section M of this RFP. No material shall be incorporated by reference or reiteration of the RFP. Any such material will not be considered for evaluation. Materials shall be presented in a manner which allows it to standalone without need for evaluators to reference other documents. Format of the proposal volumes shall be as follows:

- All typing (including that on charts, graphs, and tables, etc.) shall be no smaller than 12 pitch.

- Two columns of text per page are acceptable.

- Elaborate format and color representations are not desirable.

- Past Performance shall be limited to 30 pages.

- The price proposal is not limited as to the number of pages.

Page limit includes: All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc. The covers for each volume, tables of contents, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tales will not be included in the page count if they are inserted solely for the reader's ease in locating parts/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked "This page intentionally left blank" will not be counted. Cross references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections.

2.0 SPECIFIC PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:

2.1 VOLUME 1 PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance Volume is due NO LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME INDICATED IN BLOCK 14 OF

THE MOST RECENT SF30 (AMENDMENT).

2.1.1 Contents of Past Performance Volume

The offeror shall submit a Past and Present Performance Volume containing the following:

-Table of Contents -Summary Page describing the role of the offeror, teaming partner, and /or joint venture partner that the offeror is required to provide Past Performance Information Sheets on, in accordance with paragraph 2.1.2 below.

-Past Performance Information Sheets completed in accordance with Attachment 2, in Section J, "Attachments."

- Past/Performance Questionnaire completed in accordance with Attachment 3, in Section J, "Attachments."(See paragraph 2.1.4 below.)

-Organization Structure Change History--See paragraph 2.1.6 below.

2.1.2 Past Performance Information Sheets: Submit information on contracts you consider most relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the proposed effort. Each relevant contract shall have been performed during the past three years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. The offeror shall submit up to five (5) Past Performance Information packages (using Attachment 2) identifying active or completed contracts, either Government or commercial, for each prime, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner (within the same division or cost center). The offeror shall provide experience data for itself and for any proposed division, or teaming contractor or partner or key personnel whose effort on this contract will significantly influence performance of the proposed construction and/or design-build effort. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past and present performance.

2.1.3 Relevant Contracts: Past Performance Information sheets referenced in 2.1.2 above shall include information on contracts that you consider relevant as defined in Table 4 of DoD Source Selection Procedures in demonstrating your ability to perform under the multiple award construction contract program. Provide data for up to five relevant contracts held within the last three years for each entity the offeror wants the Government to consider. Performance Information Sheets for each contract is limited to three (3) pages. Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance. Note that the Government will not consider performance on an effort that concluded more than three years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. Relevant past performance information must demonstrate design/build construction experience with multiple disciplines, such as new construction, renovation, alteration and repair, with associated architectural and engineering work, such as airfield, pavement, renovation, repair, additions/upgrades, along with specific work in heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), electrical, mechanical and other major trades. Projects shall be similar in size, scope, and complexity as those anticipated under this contract, i.e., having a project values of $1M and above, and include projects with the Federal Government, state and local government agencies, and commercial customers. A "Design-build" project is defined as a single contract that requires the prime contractor to engage architectural, engineering services and construction services to complete the project with the prime contractor being the single point of responsibility.

2.1.4 Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaires: The Government requests the offeror to send out Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaires to each of the Points of Contact (POCs) identified in the Past Performance Volume for the contracts the…