Enterprise_Resource_Planning_Software_Modernization_(re-solicitation)_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf
PDF 357 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Enterprise Resource Planning Software Modernization (re-solicitation) State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- RFP- 26 - 078
- Issued by
- Pinellas County, Florida
About this file
This is an addendum to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City of St. Petersburg, Florida, for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software Modernization to replace its current Oracle E-Business Suite system with a fully SaaS cloud-based solution. The City seeks integrated, modular functionality covering Finance, Procurement, Human Capital Management, Budgeting and Planning, with vendors required to either provide all modules or facilitate integration of third-party solutions. The solicitation requires comprehensive implementation services including project management, system design, hardware provisioning, interface development, systems integration, data migration, testing, implementation, training, and maintenance. A dedicated project manager must be assigned for the project duration with mandatory quarterly onsite two-day reviews and attendance at module kickoff and go-live events. The pre-proposal meeting was scheduled for January 6, 2026, at 10:00 am via Microsoft Teams. Questions were due by January 20, 2026, at 12:00 pm, with responses provided by January 22, 2026. Proposal submissions are due electronically by March 3, 2026, at 3:00 pm through the City's online procurement portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete. Evaluation and shortlisting was scheduled for March 4, 2026, with an anticipated recommendation of award to City Council on September 17, 2026.
Evaluation will be weighted across 11 criteria totaling 100 points, with implementation cost weighted at 11 percent, annual support cost at 7 percent, and set-asides for Small Business Enterprise (2%), Minority Business Enterprise (2%), and Women Business Enterprise (2%). Vendors must meet seven minimum qualifications, including successful implementation of the proposed solution for multiple comparable state and local government agencies within the last three years, completion of at least five Oracle EBS data migrations of similar data volume, certification as an implementation partner of the proposed software vendor, post-deployment support experience, capability to adapt to changing state and federal regulations, cloud/SaaS hosting services experience, and ability to meet insurance requirements. The current environment consists of 3,201 full-time employees, 603 contingent workers, and 2,727 retirees, with approximately 3.4 terabytes of data requiring migration with a minimum of three passes prior to go-live. The City currently operates Oracle EBS on a locally hosted Solaris platform and utilizes various third-party systems including OpenGov, B2G, GovMax, Neighborly, and Kronos that will require integration consideration. Specific award amounts are not stated in the solicitation; however, vendors must provide cost proposals for implementation services, hardware, licenses, hosting, data migration, annual support and maintenance for years one through five, and other associated costs.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP- 26 - 078
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SOFTWARE
MODERNIZATION (RE-SOLICITATION)
City of St. Petersburg
P.O. Box 2842
St. Petersburg, FL 33731
RELEASE DATE: December 16, 2025
DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: January 20, 2026
RESPONSE DEADLINE: March 3, 2026, 3:00 pm
RESPONSES MUST BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete
City of St. Petersburg
Enterprise Resource Planning Software Modernization (re-solicitation)
I. Introduction
II. Solicitation Information
III. Evaluation Criteria
IV. Vendor Questionnaire
V. Scope of Work
VI. Cost Proposal
VII. General Terms
Attachments:
A - Appendix A - Statement of Work
B - Attachment 1 to Appendix A - Pension Management System Requirements
C - Attachment 1 - EBS Interfaces
D - Attachment 2 - Security Questionnaire
E - Attachment 3 - Submittal Response Form
F - Base Agreement
G - Current Oracle License Count
#RFP- 26 - 078
Title: Enterprise Resource Planning Software Modernization (re-solicitation)
1. Introduction
1.1. Summary
The City of St. Petersburg is requesting proposals from qualified vendors to provide functionality to replace its current Oracle E-Business Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software system with a fully
SaaS Cloud-based solution. Vendors are to participate in its implementation of a replacement software for
Oracle E-Business Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software.
As the City balances its needs for full integration versus best-of-breed functionality, it is soliciting proposals for the following:
Turnkey, fully integrated, modular functionality for:
• Finance,
• Procurement,
• Human Capital,
• Budgeting and Planning
The City is looking for the Integrator/Vendor to provide an integrated solution by either offering all modules themselves or facilitating the integration of modules they do not offer. The City recognizes that this project will have a significant impact on the City staff and is looking to minimize that impact insofar as possible. To the extent the Vendor is able, the City is looking for the Vendor to conduct a thorough business analysis at the start of each module and to provide the City with a pre-configured system using its best practices and experience as a model. The City is expecting to review and test this pre-configured system, requesting minimal changes as required. Overall services associated with the implementation of all proposals must include: project management, system design, hardware, interface development, systems integration, data migration, testing, implementation, training and maintenance. The City is looking for the Vendor to provide a project manager for the duration of the project and expects the project manager to be onsite at least quarterly for a two-day onsite project review with the City; onsite visits should include kickoff and go-live for each module.
1.2. Background
The City’s Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) applications run on a locally hosted Solaris platform maintained centrally by the Department of Technology Services (DoTS). Our Oracle EBS environment has been running with the city since 2003 and has been maintained by installing the most current releases. Oracle EBS is nearing its end of life and will need to be replaced within the next few years.
Current employee counts are as follows:
Full Time Employees: 3,201
Contingent workers: 603 (part-time workers which are not benefit eligible)
Retirees: 2,727
1.3. Contact Information
Steven Poceous Purchasing Manager Email: steven.poceous@stpete.org Phone: (727) 551-3896
Department:
Technology
1.4. Timeline
*Timeline is subject to change
Solicitation Published December 16, 2025
Pre-Proposal Meeting (Non-Mandatory) January 6, 2026, 10:00am
Microsoft Teams https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00
YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40t hread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0 c77-92ef-4eea-a024-
3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c7
3f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d
Deadline for Questions January 20, 2026, 12:00pm
Deadline for Question Response January 22, 2026, 12:00pm
Deadline for Submittals March 3, 2026, 3:00pm
Evaluation/Shortlisting March 4, 2026, 10:00am
Anticipated Recommendation of Award to
City Council
September 17, 2026 mailto:steven.poceous@stpete.org tel:(727)551-3896 https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmEwZGE0NDUtZTJjMC00YzgyLWE0MmUtMGUwY2Y0MmE2ODBm%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f3fe0c77-92ef-4eea-a024-3f1a4f814e08%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2248f5c73f-5658-4bd2-9d4e-d2e7af8d61f6%22%7d
2. Solicitation Information
2.1. Submission or Receipt of Proposal
Proposals will be received through the City’s online bidding system no later than 3:00 pm on Tuesday, March 3, 2026.
2.2. Standard for Award
The City will award to one vendor whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the City, taking into consideration the price and the evaluation criteria set forth in this solicitation. All awards are contingent on the Vendor meeting the minimum qualifications outlined in this solicitation.
The City reserves the right, at any time, to evaluate more vendors for inclusion on the list of approved vendors. All Vendors must meet the minimum qualifications outlined in this solicitation.
2.3. Selection Process
A. Short-Listing. Where there are multiple responsive proposals to the solicitation, a short-listing of two or more Vendors may be made. Negotiations as outlined in City Code Section 2-193 (g) will begin with the selected Vendors on the short-list. If there is only one responsive proposal, negotiations may proceed with a single Vendor.
B. Negotiations. The City may conduct discussions (negotiations) with short-listed Vendors to clarify and understand proposals and to provide responses to post-proposal opening and modifications to the solicitation specifications that are in the best interest of the City and that do not significantly change the scope or purpose of the project for which the solicitation was issued
(“negotiation subjects”). During the negotiation process, short-listed Vendors will be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and revision of proposals related to negotiation subjects for the purpose of preparing their best and final offer which may be requested and received by the City prior to the conclusion of the negotiation process. If modifications are made as a result of these discussions, they will be put in writing. Following discussions, the City may set a time and date for the best and final offers from those Offerors with whom discussions were held. Proposals may be reevaluated after receipt of the best and final offers.
C. Award without Discussion. The City may award the Agreement on the basis of initial proposals received, without discussions. Therefore, each initial proposal should contain the Vendor’s best terms in relation to all relevant evaluation criteria.
2.4. Submittal Requirements
Please see attachment: Proposal Submittal Requirements https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete/projects/220792
3. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated based solely on the following evaluation criteria:
No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)
1. Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the purpose, scope, and deliverables of the project and identified potential issues
Points Based 10 (10% of Total)
2. Organizational capacity and experience with implementing systems for those that are similar in size and complexity to St.
Petersburg
Points Based 15 (15% of Total)
3. Satisfied RFP requirements Points Based 20 (20% of Total)
4. Management plan for the project Points Based 16 (16% of Total)
5. Implementation cost Points Based 11 (11% of Total)
6. Annual support cost Points Based 7 (7% of Total)
7. Financial stability Points Based 10 (10% of Total)
8. Acceptance of Base Agreement Points Based 5 (5% of Total)
9. SBE Points Based 2 (2% of Total)
10. MBE Points Based 2 (2% of Total)
11. WBE Points Based 2 (2% of Total)
4. Vendor Questionnaire
4.1. General Information
4.1.1. Is the Vendor registered with the Florida Department of State, Division of
Corporations (Sunbiz) in accordance with Florida Statute §607.1501?* ☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.2. Is the Vendor a City of St. Petersburg certified SBE? * If you have submitted an application and it is pending, please send an email to osd@stpete.org. In the subject line- provide the solicitation number and due date.
☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.3. Is the Vendor a City of St. Petersburg certified MWBE? * If you have submitted an application and it is pending, please send an email to osd@stpete.org. In the subject line- provide the solicitation number and due date.
☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.4. Address for Headquarters location.*
*Response required
4.1.5. Address of office providing service, if different than above.
4.1.6. Contact Information for Contact Person.*
This person must be capable of committing the company to an agreement with the City.
• Name
• Title
• Phone
*Response required
4.1.7. Description of nature of company’s business.*
*Response required
4.1.8. Year the Company was Founded.*
*Response required
4.1.9. Number of years company has operated under the current name.* mailto:osd@spete.org mailto:osd@spete.org
*Response required
4.1.10. Number of years company has been in the present business.* *Response required
4.1.11. Company’s bank of record.*
*Response required
4.1.12. Describe any litigation that the vendor has been a party to in the last five years where it was alleged that the offeror breached a contract for similar services with a client/customer and describe any contracts for similar services that the vendor failed to complete for similar services. Describe the facts and status of any such litigation or contract. * Type N/A if not applicable.
*Response required
4.1.13. Identify any government entity that has debarred or otherwise prohibited the vendor from responding to its competitive solicitations within the last five years. Describe the circumstances surrounding such debarment or other prohibition. * Type N/A if not applicable.
*Response required
4.1.14. The vendor acknowledges that it has read, understands and will comply with
Florida Statute §448.095 pertaining to required use of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security E-Verify system. Should the City terminate the contract with the vendor for violation of §448.095, vendor may not be awarded a contract with the City for at least one year.* ☐ Please confirm
*Response required
4.1.15. The vendor acknowledges that its solicitation response is subject to Public
Records laws (Chapter 119, Florida Statutes).* ☐ Please confirm
*Response required
4.1.16. Will vendor allow other agencies to piggyback the contract if awarded?* ☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.17. The vendor hereby makes all certifications required by Florida Statute
§287.135 related to scrutinized companies.* ☐ Yes
☐ No
4.1.18. Is vendor required to provide any disclosures to the City regarding a foreign country of concern pursuant to Florida Statutes §286.101 (3)(a)? * ☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.19. If YES, please provide the disclosure(s) in accordance with the requirements of
Florida Statute §286.101 (3)(a).
4.1.20. The vendor certifies that it takes no exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation.* ☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.21. If exceptions are taken, specify in space below.
4.1.22. Has the vendor identified any trade secrets or confidential information in its solicitation response?* ☐ Yes
☐ No
*Response required
4.1.23. If yes to the above question, please upload your redacted proposal here.
4.1.24. Please upload your proposal
4.1.25. I currently have the required insurance coverage as specified in the solicitation and will be able to provide a Certificate of Insurance if awarded. * ☐ Please confirm
5. Scope of Work
5.1. Overview
The following sections outline the Scope of Work (SOW) for this solicitation, detailing the requirements for a new ERP solution that encompasses Finance Administration, Human Capital Management (HCM), Procurement, Budget Management, Grants, Loans, and Pension Management capabilities. Additionally, it includes the services necessary for implementing, supporting, and hosting the solution. The proposed solution and its associated services aim to replace the current core ERP systems and processes, as well as to replace or integrate with other existing third-party solutions and technologies used by the City of St.
Petersburg (the City). The primary ERP system currently in use by the City is Oracle EBS, which this
RFP intends to replace. A list of other systems and corresponding interfaces utilized by the City can be found in C - Attachment 1 - EBS Interfaces . The outcome of this procurement will result in an ERP
Solution that meets the City’s requirements as defined in these sections, as well as provide a foundation to fulfill future business needs.
See Appendix A for the complete Statement of Work
5.2. Solution
The City seeks a unified ERP suite (the Solution) to address the majority of the required capabilities outlined. If a vendor believes that a specific capability, such as Pension Capabilities or Loan Management
Capabilities, can be effectively addressed with a third-party solution integrated into the core ERP suite, they are welcome to propose this as part of the Solution. At this point, the City will not consider vendors proposing point solutions that address only specific capabilities without integrating others.
5.3. Minimum qualifications
At a minimum, vendor must meet the following qualifications:
A. Have successfully implemented, in the last 3 years, the proposed cloud/SaaS solution for multiple state and local government agencies comparable in size to the City of St. Petersburg as described in the Scope of Work and provide references to these implementations.
B. Have successfully completed at least five (5) data migrations from Oracle EBS into a modern
ERP of similar data amount as described in section 2.5.1.10 of the statement of work and provide references for such projects.
C. Be a certified implementation partner of the proposed software vendor(s).
D. Have successfully provided post-deployment support services, in the last three (3) years, for multiple state and local government agencies comparable in size to the City of St. Petersburg as described in this Scope of Work.
E. Have supplied support services that will adapt to the changing state/federal regulations and policy changes for municipalities comparable in size to the City of St. Petersburg as described in this
Scope of Work.
F. Have provided cloud/SaaS hosting services for municipalities comparable in size to the City of
St. Petersburg as described in this Scope of Work.
G. Have the ability to meet insurance requirements.
6. Cost Proposal
IMPLEMENTATION FEE
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure Unit Cost Total
1 Implementation Services (including training) 1 ea
2 Hardware (if any) 1 ea
3 Perpetual License (if any) 1 ea
4 Recurring Licenses during implementation 1 ea
5 Hosting during implementation 1 ea
6 Data and associated document migration (currently at 3.4TB) min 3 passes prior to go-live
4 per pass
TOTAL
USAGE FEE
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure Unit Cost Total
1 Support/Maintenance Cost - Year 1 1 year
2 Support/Maintenance Cost - Year 2 1 year
3 Support/Maintenance Cost - Year 3 1 year
4 Support/Maintenance Cost - Year 4 1 year
5 Support/Maintenance Cost - Year 5 1 year
OTHER ASSOCIATED COSTS
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure Unit Cost Total
1 Environments (development, testing, training, production) as they are created
1 per occurrence
2 User license per module 1 ea
3 3rd party software (interface development) 1 per occurrence
4 Cost to move to a higher server tier (if needed) 1 ea
7. General Terms
7.1. Vendor Registration
Vendor must register online with the City of St. Petersburg via their online sourcing system at https://procurement.opengov.com/signup and subscribe to City's Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete for solicitation notifications. Prior to an award of an
Agreement resulting from this solicitation, Vendor shall be registered with the Florida Department of
State, Division of Corporations to do business within the State of Florida in accordance with Florida
Statute 607.1501.
7.2. Solicitation Review
Vendors are required to carefully review this solicitation for defects and questionable or objectionable material. Comments concerning defects and questionable or objectionable material must be made in writing to the Procurement Analyst of record for this solicitation and received by the City at least 10 days before the solicitation submission deadline. This will allow issuance of any necessary addendum. A protest based on omission or error, or on the content of the solicitation, will be disallowed if these faults have not been brought to the attention of the City, in writing, at least 10 days before the time set for submission deadline.
7.3. Solicitation Response Preparation
Vendors are expected to examine this solicitation and all related documents. Failure to do so is at the
Vendor’s risk. Each vendor shall furnish the information required by this solicitation. Vendor(s) shall retain a copy of all documents for future reference. All solicitation responses must be submitted with the
Vendor’s legal name and by an officer or employee having the authority to bind the Vendor by his or her signature.
The City will not pay any costs associated with the preparation, submittal, presentation, or evaluation of any solicitation response.
7.4. Questions
All questions must be submitted via City's online sourcing system's Question & Answer feature no later than 12:00 pm on Tuesday, January 20, 2026. Questions will be answered via City's online sourcing system no later than 12:00 pm on Thursday, January 22, 2026. More complex questions may require a written addendum to the solicitation. Explanations or instructions will not materially alter this solicitation unless they are in writing. Oral explanations or instructions given before the award of an Agreement will not be binding. If necessary, a written addendum to this solicitation will be issued and posted on the
City’s online sourcing system at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete/projects/220792 for download by Vendors.
7.5. Amendments
Any amendments issued for this solicitation will be posted as an addendum on the City’s online sourcing system at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete/projects/220792 and notifications will be released to vendors who are following the project by clicking "Follow". Vendors must submit their responses to the most current version of the solicitation as amended, if applicable.
https://procurement.opengov.com/signup https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/stpete
7.6. Submission of Solicitation Responses
Solicitation responses will be received through the City’s online sourcing system. E-mail or in-person submittals will not be considered unless approved before the solicitation submission deadline by the
Procurement and Supply Management Director. Late proposals and modifications will not be considered;
however, solicitation responses may be modified online at any time prior to the submission deadline.
Failure to follow the instructions in this solicitation is cause for rejection of the submittal.
7.7. Mistakes in the Solicitation
Solicitation responses may be modified or withdrawn in the online application portal prior to the time and date set for the solicitation opening. Correction or withdrawal of solicitation responses after the solicitation opening because of an inadvertent non-judgmental mistake in the solicitation requires careful consideration to protect the integrity of the competitive solicitation process and to assure fairness. If the mistake is attributable to an error in judgment, the solicitation response may not be corrected. Solicitation response corrections or withdrawals by reason of non-judgmental mistakes are permissible but only to the extent they are not contrary to the interest of the City or the fair treatment of other vendors.
7.8. Information Designated a Trade Secret and/or Confidential and/or Proprietary
All solicitation responses (including all documentation and materials attached thereto or provided in connection with this solicitation) submitted to the City are subject to Florida’s public records laws (i.e., Chapter 119, Florida Statutes), which requires disclosure of public records, unless exempt, if a public records request is made. Solicitation responses (including all documentation and materials attached thereto or provided in connection with this solicitation (even if in a separate electronic file)) submitted to the City cannot be returned. DO NOT LIST YOUR ENTIRE SOLICITATION RESPONSE AS TRADE
SECRET AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL. The City will not consider solicitation responses if the entire response is labeled a Trade Secret and/or Confidential and/or Proprietary.
If Vendor believes that its solicitation response contains information that is a trade secret (as defined by
Florida law) and/or information that is confidential and/or proprietary and therefore exempt from disclosure, then such information must be submitted in a separate electronic file and comply with the following requirements. In addition to submitting the information in a separate or electronic file, Vendor must include a general description of the information designated as a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary and provide reference to the Florida statute or other law which exempts such designated information from disclosure in the event a public records request.
The City does not warrant or guarantee that information designated by Vendor as a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary is a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary and exempt from disclosure. The City offers no opinion as to whether the reference to the Florida statute or other law by
Vendor is/are correct and/or accurate. Please be aware that the designation of information as a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary may be challenged in court by any person or entity. By designation of information as a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary Vendor agrees to defend and indemnify the City, its employees, agents, and elected and appointed officials (“Indemnified Parties”) against any and all claims, demands, and actions (whether or not a lawsuit is commenced) arising out of or in connection with Vendor's designation of information as a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary and to hold harmless the Indemnified Parties for any award to a plaintiff for damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and for costs and attorney's fees (including those of the City Attorney’s office) incurred by the City by reason of any claim, demand, or action arising out of or related to the Vendor's designation of information as a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary.
Failure to comply with the requirements above shall be deemed as a waiver by Vendor to claim that any information in its solicitation response is a trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary, regardless of whether such information is labeled trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary. Vendor acknowledges, understands, and agrees that all information in Vendor's solicitation response (not including information submitted in a separate electronic file and designated trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary in accordance with the requirements in this section) will be disclosed, without any notice to Vendor, if a public records request is made for such information, and the City shall not be liable to Vendor for such disclosure.
Vendor acknowledges and understands that Vendor's proposal, including the information submitted in a separate electronic file and designated trade secret and/or confidential and/or proprietary in accordance with the requirements in this section, will be distributed to the evaluation committee members, City staff, and City consultants to allow Vendor's entire solicitation response, including the information submitted in a separate electronic file, to be evaluated and considered for award of the Agreement. The entire contents of the Vendor's solicitation response, including the information submitted in a separate electronic file, may be discussed at meetings that are open to the public, subject to the requirements set forth in
Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.
7.9. Bonds
Vendors will need to furnish all bonds as indicated in the solicitation, if applicable.
7.10. Cash Discounts
When the City is entitled to a cash discount, the period of computations will commence on the date of delivery, or receipt of a correctly completed invoice, whichever is later. If an adjustment in payment is necessary due to damage, the cash discount period shall commence on the date final approval for payment is authorized. If a discount is part of the Agreement, but the invoice does not reflect the existence of a cash discount, the City is entitled to a cash discount with the period commencing on the date it is determined by the City that a cash discount applies.
7.11. Award
The solicitation will be awarded based on the requirements outlined in the scope, the criteria or factors identified in the solicitation, and the standard for award for the solicitation. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all parts of the solicitation response, waive informalities, and request re-solicitations on the services or products outlined in the scope. The City reserves the right to award the
Agreement on a split-order, lump-sum, or individual item basis, or such combination as shall best serve the interest of the City unless otherwise specified.
Pursuant to Florida Statute sec. 287.05701, the City will not request documentation of a Vendor’s social, political, or ideological interests, consider such interests, or give preference to a vendor based on such interests.
7.12. Acceptance Period
Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, the solicitation response may be held by the City for a period of ninety (90) days after the submission deadline and will continue in full effect and not be subject to withdrawal during that period until an Agreement has been executed with a Vendor. If no Agreement has been executed within the ninety-day period, any solicitation response may be withdrawn or nullified by either the City or the Vendor, or be deemed to be confirmed and extended in time for as long as permitted by the Vendor submitting each solicitation response.
7.13. Right to Reject
Vendors must comply with all the terms of the solicitation, all applicable provisions of the City of St.
Petersburg City Code, and all applicable federal and state laws. The City may reject any solicitation response that does not comply with all material and substantive terms, conditions, and performance requirements of the solicitation.
The City may waive minor informalities that (i) do not affect responsiveness; (ii) are merely matter of form or format; (iii) do not change the relative standing or otherwise prejudice other vendors; (iv) do not change the meaning or scope of the solicitation; (v) are trivial, negligible or immaterial in nature; (v) do not effect a material change in the work; or (vi) do not constitute a substantial exclusion or modification of a requirement or provision in the solicitation.
7.14. Vendor Complaints
All complaints or grievances should be first submitted in writing to the Procurement & Supply
Management Director, by email at Stephanie.Scarbrough@stpete.org or by mail to P. O. Box 2842, St.
Petersburg, FL 33731 who will promptly investigate the validity of the complaint and present the findings in writing to the person who submitted the complaint.
7.15. Protest
(a) All protests related to a solicitation or award must be first submitted in writing to the POD no later than seven
(7) days preceding the date of the City Council meeting approving the contract, or no later than seven (7) calendar days following the selection of the successful bidder if the contract does not require City Council approval.
(b) The POD will consider the protest if it is timely filed and contains the following:
(1) Sufficient information to identify the solicitation or award that is the subject of the protest;
(2) The grounds that demonstrate how the procurement process is contrary to law or how the solicitation document is unnecessarily restrictive or legally flawed;
(3) Evidence or supporting documentation that supports the grounds on which the protest is based; and
(4) The relief sought.
(c) If the protest meets the requirements of subsection (b) of this section, the POD will investigate the validity of the protest and present the findings in writing to the person or entity that submitted the protest. Otherwise, the
POD will promptly notify the person or entity that submitted the protest that the protest is untimely or that the protest failed to meet the requirements of subsection (b) of this section and give the reasons for the failure.
(d) If the person or entity is dissatisfied with the POD’s response, the person or entity may then make an appeal to the City Administrator, who will hear the appeal. The City may not establish appellate jurisdiction of the courts; however, if allowed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or other rule or judicial decision, the decision from the City Administrator is the final decision of the City and may be subject to judicial review in the manner provided by law.
7.16. Public Entity Crimes
A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not (i) submit a solicitation response on an Agreement to provide any goods or services to a public entity, (ii) submit a solicitation response on an Agreement with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, (iii) submit a solicitation response for leases of mailto:stephanie.swinson@stpete.org real property to a public entity, (iv) be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under an Agreement with any public entity, or (v) transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017 for Category Two for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.
7.17. Nondiscrimination
Vendors for the City of St. Petersburg are required to comply with all applicable laws regarding discrimination in employment, including Pinellas County Code Section 70-53 (a)(1) (prohibiting discrimination in employment based on race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, or disability) and all other applicable federal, state and local laws. Vendors are encouraged to provide workplaces free of discrimination in terms of conditions of employment, including benefits.
7.18. Prohibited Communication
Vendors and their employees, agents, contractors, and representatives are prohibited from lobbying City
Council, the Mayor, City staff, selection committee members, and City project consultants relative to this solicitation until the solicitation selection and award processes have been completed. Non-compliance with this provision may result in disqualification from consideration of the award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not prohibit the Vendor from (i) providing public comment in accordance with applicable laws and City policies at public meetings where public comment is permitted, (ii) communicating with the assigned Procurement Analyst, (iii) making a presentation during a selection committee meeting if requested by the selection committee, or (iv) submitting a dispute or complaint in accordance with the requirements set forth in this solicitation.
7.19. Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
It is the policy of the City of St. Petersburg to purchase recycled and environmentally preferable goods.
Environmentally preferable goods are defined as “products or services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose.” This includes products that contain recycled content, reduced toxicity and pollution, conserve energy, conserve water, prevent waste, and promote sustainability and resiliency initiatives.
This policy does not require the City to specify environmentally preferable products or services when it can be demonstrated that they are not in the best interest of the City compared to products and services that are not as environmentally preferable. Best interests include but are not limited to, service life, life cycle cost, product effectiveness, or compatibility. This policy will be carried out consistent with the
City’s obligations and purpose, and with an overall intent to obtain competitive prices and to provide value to the taxpayer.
7.20. Health In All Policies
Pursuant to Executive Order EO-2018-04, it is the policy of the City to apply the consideration of health, health impacts, and the social determinants of health to the City’s decision-making, including policy development and implementation, budgeting, and the delivery of services and procurement of supplies and construction. Vendors are encouraged to propose services, supplies, and construction that promote health to the greatest extent practicable in their responses to City solicitations. Vendors are further encouraged to provide workplaces that promote the health and well-being of their employees.
7.21. American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Public Notice
In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of St. Petersburg will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in the City’s services, programs, or activities. If Vendor requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to adequately respond to this solicitation. Vendor should contact ADA Coordinator Lendel Bright at (727)-893-7229 or email at lendel.bright@stpete.org as soon as possible but no later than 72 hours before the applicable deadline.
7.22. Background Checks
In the event the solicitation or Agreement requires criminal history checks, Vendor will be responsible for conducting a criminal history check for each employee or subcontractor for which a criminal history check is required.
7.23. Disqualification
The City reserves the right to disqualify Vendors before or after opening, upon evidence of collusion with intent to defraud or other illegal practices on the part of the Vendors.
7.24. Taxes
The City of St. Petersburg is exempt from any taxes imposed by the State and/or Federal Government.
Exemption certificates will be provided upon request.
7.25. Compliance with State and/or Federal Requirements
All Vendors entering into a contract with the City with permit(s) issued by a state or federal agency, shall comply with the requirements set forth in the permit(s).
7.26. E-Verify
Vendor shall comply with Florida Statute §448.095 pertaining to required use of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security's E-Verify system, and that should the City terminate§ the contract with the Vendor for violation of §448.09(1), Vendor may not be awarded a contract with the City fort at least one year.
7.27. Exceptions to Terms and Conditions
If the Vendor takes exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation and refuses to withdraw such exceptions, the City may deem the Vendor nonresponsive if the City determines that negotiating with the
Vendor to address such exceptions may affect the fair treatment of other vendors.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .