B08_Attach_14_PSP.pdf
PDF 288 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ACAD 312255 - Rehabilitate Schoodic Water System
- Solicitation number
- 140P2022R0043
About this file
This document contains a request for proposal for rehabilitation services at Acadia National Park. The National Park Service seeks proposals to rehabilitate the water and wastewater systems at Schoodic Park, including sewer pump stations, collection systems, water distribution systems, SCADA controls, generators, hazardous materials abatement, and related site work. Offerors must provide pricing for base line items and optional line items on a lump sum or unit price basis. Proposals are due by the date and time specified in the solicitation. The contract will be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal follows the solicitation instructions and is most advantageous to the government considering price and other factors.
View the file
Other files
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ACADIA NATIONAL PARK
Solicitation 140P2022R0043 Rehabilitate Schoodic Water and Waste Water Systems
May 3, 2022
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
Proposal Submission Package
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
DENVER SERVICE CENTER
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2022R0043
Offeror Company Name
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Title Title
Project Location City, State
Brief Project Description
Description
Project Owner Company Name POC: First & Last Name Phone: (XXX) XXX-XXXX
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
Contractor Name
Role on Referenced
Project (Prime or Sub)
Trade
Price (list for each contractor’s specific work)
Performance Period
(calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work) Original Final Original Final
Sparky’s Electrical Company Prime Prime $XXX,XXX $X,XXX,XXX XX XX
ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co Subcontractor Plumbing & Mechanical
$X,XXX,XXX $X,XXX,XXX XXX XXX
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. 140P2022R0043
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
Notice to Contractor
Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the
Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
OFFEROR INFORMATION
Company Name Company
Street Address Address
City City
State State
Zip Code XXXXX
Unique Entity Identifier
(UEI) Number / SAM
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone
A. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER
PROJECT EXPERIENCE)
Project Title Title
Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description
B. REFERENCE:
Name First, Last
Position / Title Title
Organization Agency or Company
Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address Email
Signature Signature
Date XX/XX/XXXX
C. EVALUATION
Rating Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area Rating
Quality
Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Schedule (& Time Management)
Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, Cost Control
Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, Management
General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)
Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, Regulatory Compliance
Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.
Overall Comments:
D. RETURN:
Return by Date and time listed in RFP
Name Tony Jasper and Jen Braaten
Title Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist
Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email Tony_Jasper@nps.gov and Jennifer_braaten@nps.gov
General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:
SURETY
Name of Surety:
Address of Surety:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
CORPORATE BANK
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
CORPORATE BANK
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
INSURANCE COMPANY
Name:
Address:
Name of Agent:
Types of Policies:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Address:
Name of Contact:
Area of Specialized Work:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Address:
Name of Contact:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Types of Material:
Contract Price Schedule Template National Park Service (NPS) - Denver Service Center (DSC) | 3-13-18
Solicitation Number:
PARK - PMIS: ACAD 312255
(Project Management Information System)
Developed Area: Schoodic
Project Title: Rehabilitate Schoodic Water and Wastewater Systems
Notice: Offerors are required to submit, a minimum, an offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line items and all option line items. Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. For all unit-priced line items, provide the unit price and the extended total price. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of error in summation, the total of the corrected amounts govern. Round totals and extended prices to whole dollars.
Contract Line
Item Number
(CLIN)
Contract Line Item (CLI) Title Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price
1 Sewer Pump Stations Rehabilitation 1 Lump Sum $0.00
2 Sewer Collection System Rehabilitation 1 Lump Sum $0.00
3 Water System Rehabilitation 1 Lump Sum $0.00
4 Campus SCADA Head End System 1 Lump Sum $0.00
5 Campus Generator Controls and SCADA System 1 Lump Sum $0.00
6 Temporary Potable Water Supply 1 Lump Sum $0.00
7 Hazardous Materials Abatement 1 Lump Sum $0.00
8 Rock Excavation 250 CY $0.00
9 Insulation Board (4-foot by 8-Foot by 2") 6000 Square Foot $0.00
TOTAL BASE PRICE (Contract Line Item Number 1 through 9) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $0.00
Option 1, Campground Sewer System
Rehabilitation 1 Lump Sum $0.00
Option 2, Replace Campground Sewer Force Main with Reroute 1 Lump Sum $0.00
Option 3, Replace Campground Sewer Force Main in Place 1 Lump Sum $0.00
Option 4, Replace Cabins Sewer Force Main in
Place 1 Lump Sum $0.00
TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item Number 10 through 13) ----------------------------------------------------------- $0.00
TOTAL PROPOSED PRICE - BASE PLUS ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item Number 1 through 14) -------------------------- $0.00
All measurement and payment information is included in Division 01 Specifications Section 01 27 00 Definition of Contract Line Items.
| B08_Attach 14_PSP |
| B08_CPS_Blank |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .