ATTACHMENT 01 - Volume 2 - WI ANG F-35 B400 ATFP Type B-3.pdf

Type B-3

Volume 2 – Antiterrorism Report

F-35: Alter Building 400 AMXS

Wisconsin Air National Guard 115th Fighter Wing Dane County Regional Airport

Truax Field Air National Guard Base

Madison, WI

NGB Contract: W9133L-16-D-0005

Task Order: W50S9F-20-F-0002

WI ANG PN: XGFG182009

January 21, 2022

Table of Contents

Project Information

1. Anti-Terrorism (AT) Standards

Standard 1. Standoff Distances

Standard 2. Unobstructed Space

Standard 3. Drive-Up/Drop-Off Areas

Standard 4. Access Roads

Standard 5. Parking Beneath Buildings or on Rooftops

Standard 6. Progressive Collapse Avoidance

Standard 7. Structural Isolation

Standard 8. Building Overhangs

Standard 9. Exterior Masonry Walls

Standard 10. Windows and Skylights

Standard 11. Building Entrance Layout

Standard 12. Exterior Doors

Standard 13. Mail Rooms

Standard 14. Roof Access

Standard 15. Overhead Mounted Architectural Features

Standard 16. Air Intakes

Standard 17. Mail Room Ventilation

Standard 18. Emergency Air Distribution Shutoff

Standard 19. Equipment Bracing

Standard 20. Under Building Access

Standard 21. Mass Notification

2. Appendix C Recommendations

3. Summary of Criteria:

Volume 2 - Antiterrorism Report F-35: Alter Building 400 AMXS th Fighter Wing, WI ANG

Truax Field, Madison, WI

Antiterrorism Narrative

PROJECT INFORMATION

1. ANTI-TERRORISM (AT) STANDARDS

The purpose of this narrative is to describe the compliance path for UFC 4-010-01, dated 12 December 2018, with Change 1, dated 19 August 2020. This standard establishes the minimum engineering standards that incorporate antiterrorism (AT) based mitigating measures where no identified threat or level of protection has been determined in accordance with UFC 4-020-01.

The intent of UFC 4-010-01 is to reduce collateral damage and the scope and severity of mass casualties in the event of a terrorist attack. These standards provide cost effective, implementable, and enforceable construction standards to protect personnel against terrorist attacks.

While complete protection against all potential threats for every inhabited building is cost prohibitive, the intent of this standard may be achieved through various means, including design and construction practices.

When the facility, or a portion thereof, complies with the definition of an inhabited facility, implementation of these standards is mandatory for all new DoD construction, is recommended for all DoD building renovations and is required for all DoD building renovations where the project costs exceed 50% of the replacement cost of the existing building in accordance with UFC 3-701-01. Note: the 50% cost is exclusive of the costs identified to meet these standards. Implementation of these standards are also required when the occupancy level changes from low occupancy to inhabited or on glazing replacement projects or HVAC/Controls upgrade projects. None of the UFC applicability exceptions apply to this facility.

Application of these standards as noted above, are required for buildings or portions of buildings being routinely occupied by 11 or more DoD personnel and with a population density of greater than one person per 430 gross square feet. The standards contained within this document do not establish the Design Basis Threat or Level of Protection for DoD buildings – this is governed by UFC 4-020-01 which establishes the Design Basis Threat and Level of Protection for individual projects.

The philosophy of these standards is to build a baseline level of resistance to terrorist attack into all DoD inhabited buildings. That philosophy affects the general practice of designing inhabited buildings. While these standards are not based on an identified threat or level of protection, they th are engineering solutions intended to provide the easiest and most economical methods to minimize injuries and fatalities in the event of a terrorist attack. The primary methods to achieve this outcome are to construct superstructures to avoid:

1. Progressive collapse,

2. Minimize hazardous flying debris,

3. Provide effective building layout,

4. Limit airborne contamination, and

5. Provide building mass notification.

Prevent Building Collapse:

Provisions for preventing building collapse are essential to minimizing mass casualties of building occupants. Those provisions apply regardless of standoff distance or the ability of buildings to resist blast effects since structural systems that provide greater continuity and redundancy among structural components will help limit collapse for any extreme loading events.

Minimize Hazardous Flying Debris:

In past explosive events where there was no building collapse, a high number of injuries resulted from flying glass fragments and debris from walls, ceilings, and fixtures (non-structural features).

Flying debris can be minimized through building design and avoidance of certain building materials and construction techniques. The glass used in most windows breaks at very low blast pressures, resulting in hazardous, dagger-like fragments. Minimizing those hazards through reduction in window numbers and sizes and through enhanced window construction has a major effect on limiting mass casualties. Hazardous fragments may also include secondary debris from such sources as barriers and site furnishings.

Provide Effective Building Layout:

Effective design of building layout and orientation can significantly reduce opportunities for terrorists to target building occupants or injure large numbers of people.

Limit Airborne Contamination:

Effective design of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems can significantly reduce the potential for chemical, biological, and radiological agents being distributed throughout buildings.

Provide Building Mass Notification:

Providing a timely means to notify building occupants of threats and what should be done in response to those threats reduces the risk of mass casualties. Effective designs will include means for both local and remote origination of information.

The terrorist threats addressed in these standards are further assumed to be directed against DoD personnel. Threats to other assets and critical infrastructure and specific threats to facilities are beyond the scope of these standards, but they are addressed in UFC 4-020-01. The following are the terrorist tactics upon which these standards are based:

External Explosive Threats:

These minimum standards are not based on a specific Design Basis Threat identified against the facility being designed. These minimum standards provide collateral damage protection for threats directed against other nearby facilities.

th

Mail Bombs:

Explosives in packages delivered through the mail can cause significant localized damage, injuries, and fatalities if they detonate inside a building. No assumption as to the size of such explosives is made in these standards. Provisions for mail bombs are limited to specifying locations of mail rooms so that they can be more efficiently hardened if a specific threat of a mail bomb is identified in the future.

Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Weapons:

For the purposes of these standards, these weapons are assumed to be improvised weapons containing airborne agents employed by terrorists. These standards do not assume comprehensive protection against this threat. They provide means to reduce the potential for widespread dissemination of such agents throughout buildings in the event of an attack either outside buildings or in mail rooms.

The following 21 Standards represent engineering solutions intended to lessen the risk of mass casualties and collateral damage resulting from terrorist attacks. Implementation of these standards will provide some protection against a wide range of threats and should reduce injuries and fatalities. The standards in this chapter provide the minimum protective measures for DoD inhabited buildings. Engineers, security and antiterrorism personnel must consider site-specific threats, mission related issues and constraints that might dictate measures beyond these minimums. Use UFC 4-020-01 to establish project requirements and determine if these minimum standards are adequate or if additional mitigation measures are required. The engineering risk analysis conducted as part of UFC 4-020-01 should be consistent with the terrorism risk analysis conducted by the installation security/AT staff.

Standard 1. Standoff Distances

For these standards, standoff distances are now only applicable to installation perimeters. The minimum standoff distance for new construction and additions to existing buildings to the installation perimeter is 50 feet when there is not an established clear zone outside of the installation perimeter.

The provision of this standard which permits use of an established clear zone outside of the installation to meet the aggregate 50 feet is not being utilized for this project. This facility is sited such that the distance to the installation perimeter is in excess of the 50-foot minimum and as such is not a design consideration.

Standard 2. Unobstructed Space

The unobstructed space around this facility has been established at a minimum of 33 feet. The standard indicates aggressors will not typically attempt to place explosive devices in areas near buildings where those explosive devices could be visually detected by building occupants. The facility has been designed to not provide obstructions or building features which may allow for concealment from observation of explosive devices 6 inches (cube) and larger around buildings and underneath building overhangs. This does not preclude the placement of site furnishings or plantings around buildings, it only requires conditions such that any explosive devices placed in these unobstructed spaces would be observable by building occupants or passers by either from within the buildings or as they walk into or around it.

Site Features:

As this is an existing facility located within the flightline, additional trees & shrubs other than those already present will not be included in the design. Obstructions such as mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, and other landscaping features are permissible in this unobstructed space th provided said explosive devices may be seen from at least one direction. Equipment has been evaluated for the capacity to conceal objects underneath and inside equipment. Voids into which explosives could be inserted or space underneath equipment large enough to conceal objects will be specified to have said equipment secured when in the unobstructed space or included in an AT compliant enclosure.

Trash Containers:

Trash containers will not be located within the flightline or within the unobstructed space.

Enclosures:

If walls or other screening devices with more than two sides are placed around electrical or mechanical equipment within the unobstructed space, enclosures will be provided as follows:

1. Enclosures must have four sides and a top.

2. Openings in screening materials and gaps between the ground and screens or walls making up an enclosure will not be 6 inches or greater.

3. Surfaces of the enclosures will be secured such that unauthorized personnel cannot gain access.

4. Where opaque top enclosures are provided, they will have a pitch of at least 1 vertical to

2 horizontal to increase visibility of objects thrown onto them and to increase the likelihood that the objects will slide off. Alternatively, if the vertical surfaces of the enclosures are transparent and at least 7 feet high, a top enclosure is not required.

Parking:

Parking is allowed within the unobstructed space. Parking may be temporarily eliminated within the unobstructed space at a higher Force Protection Condition (FPCON).

Adjacent Existing Buildings:

Adjacent existing buildings will not be located within 33 feet of this new facility.

Standard 3. Drive-Up/Drop-Off Areas

This standard has been removed and no longer applies.

Standard 4. Access Roads

This standard has been removed and no longer applies.

Standard 5. Parking Beneath Buildings or on Rooftops

In compliance with Standard 5, parking does not exist beneath this facility or on the rooftop of this facility – as such this Standard is not applicable.

Standard 6. Progressive Collapse Avoidance

As this is an existing facility, the requirements of this Standard and UFC 4-023-03 are not applicable to this project.

Standard 7. Structural Isolation

Structural isolation minimizes the possibility that collapse of one part of a building will affect the stability of the remainder of the building. Low occupancy portions of inhabited buildings are designed to comply with this Standard to ensure their respective superstructures are structurally independent from the inhabited portions of the buildings. Since this is an existing facility with no planned additions, this standard is not applicable to this project.

th

Standard 8. Building Overhangs

Building overhangs (and breezeways) do not exist and have not been provided with inhabited spaces above them where people could gain access to the areas underneath the overhangs and as such, this Standard is not applicable.

Standard 9. Exterior Masonry Walls

No new, exterior masonry walls are anticipated in the design of this facility; therefore, this standard is not applicable. Should any new, exterior masonry walls be constructed, all shall have vertical and horizontal reinforcement distributed throughout the wall section. The vertical reinforcement ratio shall meet or exceed 0.05% and be spaced at no more than 4 feet on center with reinforcement within 16 inches of the ends of walls. Horizontal reinforcement ratio shall meet or exceed 0.025%, and consist of either joint reinforcement spaced no more than 16 inches on center, or consist of bond beam reinforcement spaced no more than 4 feet on center, with reinforcement within 16 inches of the top and bottom of the wall. For conventional cavity wall construction, this reinforcement needs only exist at the inner (structural) wall.

Standard 10. Windows and Skylights

Windows were observed to have been recently replaced and it is believed they exceed the requirements of the 2018 AT/FP standards. All new glazing will comply with this Standard. All glazing in exterior building elements such as storefronts, doors, windows, curtain walls, clerestories, and skylights be included, all glazing will have no less than 1/4-inch nominal polycarbonate or laminated glass. The 1/4-inch laminated glass will consist of two nominals 1/8-inch glass panes bonded together with a minimum of a 0.030-inch interlayer of a material designed for blast resistance. For insulated glass units (IGU), polycarbonate or laminated glass will be utilized for the innermost pane. For laminated glass, a glazing frame bite will be provided in accordance with ASTM F 2248. For polycarbonate, a glazing frame bite of no less than 1.5 times the polycarbonate thickness will be provided.

Monolithic glass or monolithic acrylic used as a single pane or as the inner pane of a multi-pane system will not be utilized. Spandrel glass when backed by a structural wall or spandrel beam, translucent fiberglass panels, other lightweight translucent plastics, and glass unit masonry are not required to comply with this standard.

Glazing in vestibules that are exterior to buildings required to comply with these standards will be designed to meet the provisions of this standard. In addition, any windows, inner doors, sidelights, and transoms that are interior to the exterior vestibules will also be designed to meet the requirements of this standard.

Standard 11. Building Entrance Layout

The building’s existing main entrance is not located facing uncontrolled vantage points (off installation) with direct lines of sight.

Standard 12. Exterior Doors

Exterior doors are believed to exceed the requirements of the 2018 AT/FP standards. All new doors will comply with this Standard. All exterior doors into inhabited areas open outwards in order to comply with both these AT standards and accessibility standards. If a door swing were to be required to open inwards, the door will be positioned such that it will not be propelled into inhabited spaces (or provide other means) to ensure they do not become hazards to building occupants. All glazing in exterior doors will comply with Standard 10.

th

Note: There are not any UFC 4-010-01 antiterrorism requirements for overhead doors.

Standard 13. Mail Rooms

This facility is not the initial recipient of mail or supplies and this standard is not applicable to the design of this facility.

Standard 14. Roof Access

Existing roof access is only provided via fixed, internal access.

Standard 15. Overhead Mounted Architectural Features

No existing overhead mounted features are present. However, should some be included, overhead mounting features weighing 31 pounds or more (excluding distributed systems such as suspended ceilings that collectively exceed that weight) are mounted using either rigid or flexible systems to minimize the likelihood that they will fall and injure building occupants. Systems are mounted such that they resist forces of 0.5 times the component weight in any horizontal direction and 1.5 times the component weight in the downward direction. In addition to this requirement, architectural feature mountings for forces such as seismic forces are also applicable.

Standard 16. Air Intakes

All existing air intakes will either be located at least 10 feet above the ground or will be extended to comply with this standard.

Standard 17. Mail Room Ventilation

This facility is not the initial recipient of mail or supplies and this standard is not applicable to the design of this facility.

Standard 18. Emergency Air Distribution Shutoff

An emergency shutoff switch in the HVAC control system will be provided. The switch will initiate a response in HVAC systems and low leakage dampers leading to the outside regardless of hand/off/auto (HOA) position within 30 seconds of switch activation subject to the guidance below.

1. Switch activation may, but is not required to, shut down HVAC systems that do not draw air from the outside and do not serve mail rooms.

2. Switch activation will not shutdown HVAC systems, but will close dampers leading to the outside for systems whose continued operation assists in preventing the spread of airborne contaminants and that do not serve mail rooms.

3. Switch activation will not shutdown HVAC systems, but will close dampers leading to the outside for systems whose continued operation provides safety of egress pathways.

Shutoff switch (or switches) will be located to be easily accessible by building occupants by locating them similarly to building mass notification system (MNS) local operating consoles (LOC) (see UFC 4-021-01 for additional information on MNS LOCS) so that the travel distance to the nearest shutoff switch will not be in excess of 200 ft. (61 m). Shutoff switches will be well labeled, and of a different color than fire alarm pull stations.

Outside air intakes, relief air, and exhaust openings will be provided with low leakage dampers that are automatically closed when the emergency air distribution shutoff switch is activated. The low leakage dampers will have maximum leakage rates of 3 cfm/square foot with a differential pressure of one inch of water gage across the damper. Low leakage dampers will be located at the building envelope or as close as possible to the building envelope. If shutting down an exhaust system will violate building or fire codes or create an unsafe condition, then the exhaust system may continue to operate. As an example, not applicable to this project, the installation of dampers in kitchen th exhaust ductwork, where the dampers can become laden with grease, may be a violation of fire codes. Also, kitchen hood exhaust fans may have to continue to operate to avoid potential fire hazards.

Switch activation will not shut down HVAC systems, but will close dampers leading to the outside for systems that serve critical areas where cooling, heating, and / or airflow requirements must be maintained to prevent mission failure, or loss of data, or unsafe conditions such as computer rooms.

Switch activation will not shutdown HVAC systems and will not close dampers leading to the outside for critical systems whose continued operation is required by code or other safety protocols such as bio containment laboratories, radio isotope spaces, or other hazardous material or explosive hazard spaces.

Switch activation may, but is not required to shutdown HVAC systems and may, but is not required to close dampers leading to the outside for systems that serve one or more normally unoccupied spaces whose access is directly to the outside such as electrical, mechanical, and fire pump rooms.

All new buildings required to comply with these standards must have a system that allows fan coil units to be shut off in an emergency. Fan coil units and air conditioners do not require low leakage dampers.

Standard 19. Equipment Bracing

All overhead equipment, utilities and other fixtures weighing 31 pounds or more (excluding distributed systems such as piping networks that collectively exceed that weight) shall be braced using either rigid or flexible systems to minimize the likelihood that they will fall and injure building occupants. All equipment mountings will be designed to resist forces of 0.5 times the equipment weight in any horizontal direction and 1.5 times the equipment weight in the downward direction.

This standard also requires equipment mountings to be designed for forces required by other criteria such as seismic standards.

Standard 20. Under Building Access

There are not any opportunities for aggressors to place explosives underneath this facility as a means of access is not provided.

Standard 21. Mass Notification

This facility will have a timely means to notify occupants of threats and instruct them what to do in response to those threats. To achieve that goal, this facility provides capability to provide real-time information to building occupants or personnel in the immediate vicinity of the building during emergency situations. The information relayed must be specific enough to determine the appropriate response actions and be capable of being originated both locally at the building and from a remote location. Building Mass Notification System is specified in accordance with UFC 4- 021-01.

th

2. APPENDIX C RECOMMENDATIONS

In addition to the above standards, the following Recommended AT Measures (located in Appendix A) have been provided in the design of this facility:

RECOMMENDATION 1. VEHICLE ACCESS POINTS.

The number of access points should be kept to the minimum necessary for security and operational purposes. This limits the number of points at which access must be controlled at increased Force Protection Conditions or if the threat increases in the future. This work will largely be part of a future project planned by the Installation at the parking lot to our south.

RECOMMENDATION 2. HIGH-SPEED VEHICLE APPROACHES.

To facilitate vehicle speed reduction, unobstructed vehicle approaches which create direct paths to building should be avoided and/or mitigated. The energy of a moving vehicle increases with the square of its velocity; therefore, minimizing a vehicle’s speed enables the vehicle barriers used to be lighter and less expensive. This work will largely be part of a future project planned by the Installation at the parking lot to our south.

RECOMMENDATION 3. DRIVE-UP/DROP-OFF AREAS.

Drive-up and drop-off areas were located away from large glazed areas of buildings to minimize the potential for hazardous flying glass fragments in the event of an explosion. Building geometries such as reentrant corners in the vicinity of parking and drive areas were laid out to minimize the possibility that explosive blast forces could be increased due to being trapped or otherwise concentrated. A couple of parking spaces will be provided as part of this project and the remainder of this work will be part of a future project planned by the Installation at the parking lot to our south.

RECOMMENDATION 4. BUILDING LOCATION.

Activities with large visitor populations provide opportunities for potential aggressors to get near buildings with minimal controls and limit opportunities for early detection of aggressor activity. To limit opportunities for aggressors, separation distances were maximized to the extent practical between buildings required to comply with these standards and areas with large visitor populations.

This facility does not have a large visitor population.

RECOMMENDATION 5. RAILROAD LOCATION.

This recommendation is not applicable as the facility is not near a railroad.

RECOMMENDATION 6. ACCESS CONTROL FOR FAMILY HOUSING.

This recommendation is not applicable as this is not a family housing facility.

RECOMMENDATION 7. STANDOFF FOR FAMILY HOUSING.

This recommendation is not applicable as this is not a family housing facility.

RECOMMENDATION 8. BUILDING SEPARATION.

This facility is separated from adjacent buildings by at least 33 feet in order to minimize the possibility that an attack on one building causes injuries or fatalities in adjacent buildings.

RECOMMENDATION 9. VISITOR CONTROL.

Locations in buildings where visitor access is controlled is kept away from sensitive or critical areas such as where high-risk or mission-critical personnel are located, or other areas with large population densities of DoD personnel.

th

RECOMMENDATION 10. ASSET LOCATION.

To minimize exposure to direct blast effects and potential impacts from hazardous glass fragments and other potential debris, critical assets and mission-critical or high-risk personnel should be located away from the building exterior.

RECOMMENDATION 11. ROOM LAYOUT.

In rooms adjacent to the exterior of the building, personnel and critical equipment are positioned to minimize exposure to direct blast effects and potential impacts from hazardous glass fragments and other potential debris.

RECOMMENDATION 12. EXTERNAL HALLWAYS.

External hallways were not utilized in order to avoid large numbers of exterior doors leading into inhabited areas of buildings.

3. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA:

In conclusion of this AT narrative, it is important to note that UFC 4-020-01 has not been released for use, and as such, no protection has been identified for this project, nor is being provided, in excess of the minimum standards described in the current version of UFC 4-010-01. Appendix B and Appendix C of the current UFC 4-010-01 contain information for specific blast analysis/design from prior UFC versions as they await inclusion in the new UFC 4-020-01. Since UFC 4-020-01 has not been approved for release, it is not currently known how these Appendices will be included or applied on a project by project or installation level. Please advise the A&E immediately, if this project has a specific blast condition, or other elevated Antiterrorism/Force Protection measure which must be analyzed or included in the design of this facility in accordance with the following:

UFC 4-010-01 Paragraph 1-15.1 States:

Determining the Design Basis Threat is an installation function requiring programmers, antiterrorism officers, and members of the threat working group. Determining the facility Design Basis Threat is the first step in planning antiterrorism requirements. However, without a defined level of protection, only the minimum standards apply. The Design Basis Threat and level of protection are unique for each individual facility and are based on the threat likelihoods and the values of the assets in the building. Use UFC 4-020-01 to determine the Design Basis Threat and level of protection for individual projects. The process outlined in UFC 4-020-01 will determine if the minimum AT standards are adequate or if additional protective measures are required.

UFC 4-010-01 Paragraph 1-17.2 States:

UFC 4-020-01 presents processes for developing the design criteria necessary to incorporate security and antiterrorism into DoD facilities and for identifying the cost implications of applying those design criteria. Those design criteria may be limited to the requirements of the minimum standards, or they may include protection of assets other than those addressed in the minimum standards (people), aggressor tactics that are not addressed in the minimum standards, or levels of protection beyond those required by the minimum standards. The cost implications for security and antiterrorism are addressed as cost increases over conventional construction for common construction types. The changes in construction represented by those cost increases are tabulated for reference, but they represent only representative construction that will meet the requirements of the design criteria. The manual also addresses the tradeoffs between cost and risk. The Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual is intended to be used by planners as well as security and antiterrorism personnel with support from planning team members.

th

The following security standards are applicable to the design and construction of this project, as indicated in the above basis of design narrative:

UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings, with change 1, 08-19-2020 UFC 4-020-01 DoD Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual, 09-11-2008 UFC 4-021-01 Design and O&M: Mass Notification Systems, with Change 1, 01-01-2010

These additional security standards are applicable to the design and construction of this project, as indicated elsewhere in the basis of design narrative UFC 4-010-03 Security Engineering: Physical Security Measures for High-Risk Personnel, 02-08-2011 UFC 4-010-05 Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities Planning, Design, and Construction, with Change 1, 10-01-2013 UFC 4-010-06 Cybersecurity of Facility-Related Control Systems, with Change 1, 01-18-2017 UFC 4-020-02 FA Security Engineering: Concept Design (FOUO), 03-01-2005 UFC 4-020-03 FA Security Engineering: Final Design (FOUO), 03-01-2005 UFC 4-021-02 Electronic Security Systems, 09-11-2019 UFC 4-022-02 Selection and Application of Vehicle Barriers, with Change 1, 08-09-2010 UFC 4-022-03 Security Fences and Gates, 10-01-2013 UFC 4-023-10 Safe Havens, 06-01-2016 UFC 4-024-01 Security Engineering: Procedures for Designing Airborne Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Protection for Buildings, 06-10-2008

Attachment 1 – Antiterrorism Site Map

Base Perimeter (Red Lines – Physical Barrier and/or Patrolled Perimeter)

New Facility (Blue Lines – Concept)

Shortest distance to shoulder of Taxiway to the North and West is > 1,000 feet.

Shortest distance to physical (fence) boundary to the East is > 500 feet.

Shortest distance to physical (fence) boundary to the South is > 1,000 feet.

ATTACHMENT 2

SF

Y - N No

Y - N No

Y Yes N - 270 229

Designed (ft.)

>50 feet

0 feet

>33 feet

STD REQUIREMENT YES NO N/A

Is the facility located at the required distance from the installation perimeter? X

Are trash containers located at the required distance away from the facility? X

Are there any obstructions within the required standoff distance of the facility that would allow for concealment from observation of explosive devices 6 inches or greater in height?

X

Are enclosures within the unobstructed space closed on all four sides and the top? X

Is the enclosure secured? X

This standard is not applicable and has been removed in the 12 December 2018 version. X

This standard is not applicable and has been removed in the 12 December 2018 version. X

Is parking permitted beneath or on the rooftops of inhabited buildings? X

Is this facility New Construction?

Is there a Clear Zone outside the Installation Perimeter?

Not Applicable.

ACCESS ROADS

PARKING BENEATH BUILDINGS OR ON ROOFTOPS

Existing (ft.) Required (ft.)

This standard is not applicable to this facility as currently designed; no such areas exist.

STANDOFF DISTANCES

Not Applicable.

The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC 4-010-01 will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. The standards below are minimums set for DoD funded projects.

DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Construction Standards - Checklist

List triggers here: Major Investments; HVAC Systems

Project Title: WI ANG - F-35: Alter Building 400 AMXSDate: January 21, 2022 Project No. XGFG182009

Is the facility defined as an Inhabited Building?

Facility Occupancy: Shops/Admin/Hangar Bay 61,787.00

If No, which "trigger(s)" listed in Chapter 1 (verify) drives compliance with these standards?

Instructions: This checklist shall be completed in its entirety for each design submission. For each standard that is marked with either not applicable (N/A) or "No", a justification shall be provided in the "comments/remarks/notes" box. For standards that are applicable and marked as "Yes", provide a narrative in the design analysis describing how the project complies with the standard.

DRIVE-UP/DROP-OFF AREAS

As noted above, the perimeter is greater 50 feet away and the minimum stand-off is 50' from the perimeter if no clear zone is present outside the perimeter.

33 ft

30 ft to 0 ft

20 ft to 50 ft

COMMENTS/REMARKS/NOTES

Distance to:

There are not any obstructions which will allow for concealment.

Electrical transformers and mechanical equipment will be tamper resistant or outside of the unobstructed space.

Not Applicable. A fence is not required around electrical and mechanical furnishings within this space provided the equipment provide no opportunity for concealment (per UFC 4-010-01, 3-3.1)

Not Applicable.

UNOBSTRUCTED SPACE

As noted above, the trash containers will be located outside the 33' unobstructed space requirement.

Installation Perimeter Established Clear Zone outside Installation Perimeter

Trash Containers

>50'

N/A

N/A

Routine Occupancy

Density (<1:430 gsf)

1 ANGETL 15-01-02 1 May 15

STD REQUIREMENT YES NO N/A

Are all vertical, load-carrying columns and walls able to sustain a loss of lateral support at any of the floor levels?

X

Can the facility withstand a removal of one primary exterior vertical or horizontal load-carrying element without progressive collapse?

X

Are floors designed to withstand a net uplift equal to the dead load plus one-half the live load? X

Are building additions structurally independent from adjacent existing buildings?

X

If not, has analysis been completed which shows collapse of either the addition or the existing building will not result in collapse of the remainder of the building?

X

Are low occupancy areas of inhabited facilities designed to be structurally independent of the inhabited areas?

X

Do building overhangs (or breezeways) exist with inhabited spaces above them where people could gain access to the areas underneath?

X

Do all external masonry walls have vertical and horizontal reinforcement distributed throughout the wall section? X

Is the vertical reinforcement ratio at least 0.05%, spaced no more than 48 inches with reinforcement within 16 inches of the ends of the walls?

X

Is the horizontal reinforcement ratio at least 0.025%, consisting of either joint reinforcement spaced no more than 16 inches, or bond beam reinforcement spaced no more than 48 inches, with reinforcement within 16 inches of the top and bottom of the wall?

X

PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS

This standard is not applicable to this facility as it is an existing facility;

however, due to ANG past requests, we will design the entire facility to these standards for an inhabited facility.

Not Applicable; there are not any overhangs with opportunities to park under them.

Not Applicable; there are no new exterior, structural masonry walls in this project.

Not Applicable; there are no new exterior, structural masonry walls in this project.

BUILDING OVERHANGS AND BREEZEWAYS

EXTERIOR MASONRY WALLS

Not Applicable; there are no new exterior, structural masonry walls in this project.

This standard is not applicable to this facility as it is an existing facility.

STRUCTURAL ISOLATION

BUILDING ADDITIONS

COMMENTS/REMARKS/NOTES

STRUCTURAL DESIGN - Standards 6 - 9

PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE AVOIDANCE

Not Applicable. There will be no building addition.

Not Applicable. There will be no building addition.

This standard is not applicable to this facility as it is an existing facility.

This standard is not applicable to this facility as it is an existing facility.

2 ANGETL 15-01-02 1 May 15

Do all glazing in exterior building elements such as storefronts, doors, windows, curtain walls, clerestories and skylights have no less than 1/4 inch nominal polycarbonate or laminated glass?

X

Does the 1/4 inch laminated glass consist of two nominal 1/8 inch glass panes bonded together with a minimum of a 0.030 inch interlayer of a material designed for blast resistance? And is insulated glass units (IGU), polycarbonate or laminated glass utilized for the innermost pane?

X

For laminated glass, is the glazing frame bite provided in accordance with ASTM F 2248?

For polycarbonate, is the glazing frame bite no less than 1.5 times the polycarbonate thickness?

X

Is the building’s main entrance facing uncontrolled vantage points with direct lines of sight to an uncontrolled vantage point? X

(As an alternative design to the above): Is a means provided to block the lines of sight using other mitigation such as walls, screening or vegetation?

X

Do all exterior doors into inhabited areas open outwards?

X (As an alternative design to the above): Are all doors positioned such that they will not be propelled into inhabited areas?

X

Does all glazing in exterior doors comply with Standard 10? X

Are the mail rooms located on the perimeter of the facility? X Are the mail rooms and loading docks located away from heavily populated portions of the facility?

X

(New Bldgs) : Has roof access been limited to controlled internal access? X

(Existing Bldgs) : Has the exterior roof access been secured with a locked cage or similar mechanism?

X

Are overhead-mounted features weighing 31-lbs or more mounted to resist forces of 0.5 times their weight in any horizontal direction and 1.5 times their weight in the downward direction?

X

Existing roof access is limited to controlled internal access.

No overhead mounted architectural features are present; as such, the existing building is in compliance with this standard.

All exterior doors open outward.

All glazing in exterior doors shall comply with Standard 10.

Not applicable based upon compliance with the above standard.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

WINDOWS AND SKYLIGHTS

BUILDING ENTRANCE LAYOUT

EXTERIOR DOORS

MAIL ROOMS AND LOADING DOCKS

ROOF ACCESS

Per UFC 4-010-01 dated 12 December 2018 chapter 3, standard 10, all new glazing will meet section 3-11.1 and will not be required to be designed for blast resistance.

Per UFC 4-010-01 dated 12 December 2018 chapter 3, standard 10, all new glazing will meet section 3-11.1 and will not be required to be designed for blast resistance.

OVERHEAD MOUNTED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

This standard is not applicable to this facility as it is an existing facility.

The main entrance does not face uncontrolled vantage points with direct lines of sight.

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Standards 10 - 15

Not required based upon compliance with the above standard.

COMMENTS/REMARKS/NOTES

Per UFC 4-010-01 dated 12 December 2018 chapter 3, standard 10, all new glazing will meet section 3-11.1 and will not be required to be designed for blast resistance.

3 ANGETL 15-01-02 1 May 15

For both new and existing bldgs, are outside air intakes located at least 10-ft above the ground?

X

Does the mail room have a separate, dedicated air ventilation system? X

Does the mail room have a dedicated exhaust system that maintains negative air pressure? X

Does the mail room have ventilation system outside air intakes, relief air, and exhausts with low leakage isolation dampers? X

Can the dampers be automatically closed to isolate the mail room?

X Do the low leakage dampers have a maximum leakage rate of 3 cfm/sq-ft with a differential pressure of 1 inch of water gage across the damper?

X

Have separate switches or methods of control to isolate mail rooms in the event of a suspected or actual chemical, biological, or radiological release in the mail room been provided?

X

Have the walls and doors between mail rooms and loading docks and inhabited areas been provided with seals and gaskets? X

Does the facility have an emergency shutoff switch in the HVAC control system that can immediately shut down the air handling system throughout the building?

X

Are the switches located where they are easily accessible by the building occupants, the travel distance to the nearest shutoff switch will not be in excess of 200 feet?

X

Are shutoff switches labeled and of a different color than fire alarm pull stations? X

Do all outside air intakes have relief air and exhaust openings with low leakage dampers that are automatically closed when the emergency air distribution shutoff switch is activated?

X

Do the low leakage dampers have a maximum leakage rate of 3 cfm/sq-ft with a differential pressure of 1 inch of water gage across the damper?

X

Where air handling equipment is being replaced or upgraded, does the design meet all provisions of Standard 18?

X

Do critical area air handling units close with low leakage isolation dampers? X

Dampers for the HVAC system will be provided as required.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

HVAC equipment will comply.

Controls for the HVAC system will be provided as required.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

Controls for the HVAC system will be provided as required.

MAIL ROOM AND LOADING DOCK VENTILATION

EMERGENCY AIR DISTRIBUTION SHUTOFF

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

There is no mail room or loading dock in this facility.

Existing outside air intakes are either located at least 10-ft above exterior grade, or will be extended to comply with this standard.

ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL DESIGN - Standards 16 - 21

AIR INTAKES

Controls for the HVAC system will be provided as required.

Controls for the HVAC system will be provided as required.

No critical areas identified. Comm Room heating and cooling equipment does not have outside air, opens only to the exterior, is not an occupied space and will not mix with facility air systems.

4 ANGETL 15-01-02 1 May 15

Are all equipment mountings designed to resist forces 0.5 times the equipment weight in any horizontal direction and 1.5 times the equipment weight in the downward direction?

X

Are crawl spaces, utility tunnels, and other means of under building access controlled? X

Does the capability exist to provide real-time info to building occupants during emergency situations? X

ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL DESIGN - Standards 16 - 21 (Cont'd)

This facility will have a timely means to notify occupants of threats and instruct them what to do in response to those threats. Design of this system will be in accordance with UFC 4-021-01.

MASS NOTIFICATION

ADDITIONAL NOTES

All electrical equipment mountings will be designed as required.

Not Applicable as this facility has no such spaces.

EQUIPMENT BRACING

UNDER BUILDING ACCESS

5 ANGETL 15-01-02 1 May 15