Atch 50-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 846 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Nellis AFB Paving IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- FA486125R0006
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Nellis and Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR) Paving Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract, solicitation number FA4861-25-R0006. The four-page form is designed to collect detailed performance information from a previous contractor, covering key evaluation areas including management, schedule, cost control, and quality.
The questionnaire requires the evaluator to rate the contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, such as communication effectiveness, adherence to contract schedules, cost management, warranty responsiveness, and compliance with technical requirements. The form includes sections for contractor and customer identification, with radio button ratings for performance metrics ranging from "Did Not Meet" to "Exceeded" in each category. Evaluators are also prompted to provide written remarks for ratings at the extreme ends of the performance scale, allowing for nuanced feedback about the contractor's past performance.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 50
ATTACHMENT 50-PAST
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA4861-25-R0006
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
Nellis and NTTR PAVING IDIQ
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code under which contract was performed:
C. Contract number / Program Title:
D. Contract type (ex: FFP, Cost, T&M):
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No
F. Was it a design-build contract? Yes No
G. Period of Performance:
H. Performs duties as: prime contractor sub-contractor
I. Initial (at time of award) contract value: $ (Basic plus all options)
J. Current/final contract value: $ (Basic plus exercised options)
K. Reasons for differences between initial contract value and final contract value:
L. Description of work provided:
M. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Evaluation or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract? Yes No
N. To help determine program relevancy, please indicate below the work the contractor has or is performing under this contract by placing an “X” in the appropriate block:
A-E Design work
Civil (pavements, site utilities) and/or Structural work
Electrical and/or Communications work
ATTACHMENT 50-PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA4861-25-R0006
Mechanical (plumbing, HVAC) work
Fire Protection work
Security (secure rooms for classified work) and/or Force Protection work
New Construction (including building additions)
Interior renovation
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or Agency Name:
B. Customer or Agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator’s name:
B. Evaluator’s title:
C. Evaluator’s phone/fax number:
D. Evaluator’s email address:
E. No. of months evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by marking the performance scale indicated in the appropriate block. The scale is defined as follows:
* Please provide comments for each response you indicated as “Did Not Meet” or “Exceeded” in response to the questions below.
A. Management:
Did Not Meet Met Exceeded N/A
A1. Communicated with Government team and with on-site supervisors to ensure accurate/timely information flow.
ATTACHMENT 50-PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA4861-25-R0006
A2. Required minimal Government direction regarding contract and technical requirements already available to them (i.e. they read/understand the contract in its entirety).
Remarks:
B. Schedule Did Not Meet Met Exceeded N/A
B1. Adhered to contract performance schedule, to include timely submission of submittals, close-outs, etc B2. Contractor was responsive to warranty calls and quickly fixed legitimate problems
Remarks:
C. Cost Control Did Not Meet Met Exceeded N/A
C1. Met and performed within originally awarded contract costs.
C2. Alerted Government of potential unforseen costs/changes before they occur, and submitted cost proposals timely.
Remarks:
D. Quality Did Not Meet Met Exceeded N/A
D1. Complied with quality control plan and followed contract quality assurance requirements.
ATTACHMENT 50-PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA4861-25-R0006
D2. Complied with technical requirements and contract specifications.
D3. Ensured poor performance by subcontractors or in-house personnel is not repeated.
Remarks:
Evaluator’s Signature Date
| ATTACHMENT 53-PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FA4861-16-R-A300 |
| SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104 |
| SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 4: EVALUATION |
| * Please provide comments for each response you indicated as “Did Not Meet” or “Exceeded” in response to the questions below. |
| Contractor: |
| Cage Code under which contract was performed: |
| Contract number Program Title: |
| Contract type ex FFP Cost TM: |
| Period of Performance: |
| undefined: |
| Currentfinal contract value: |
| K: |
| L: |
| Customer or Agency Name: |
| B: |
| commands: |
| Evaluators name: |
| Evaluators title: |
| Evaluators phonefax number: |
| Evaluators email address: |
| Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: |
| Remarks: |
| Remarks_2: |
| Remarks_3: |
| Remarks_4: |
| Date: |
| Group12: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Group13: Off |
| Group14: Off |
| Group15: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .