The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service New England Region
Solicitation 47PB0019R0002 JFK Operations and Maintenance Exhibit 1 Proposal Checklist Cover Sheet
OFFEROR NAME:
PROPOSAL DATE:
| PROPOSAL ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE SOLICITATION |
| Per |
| On Pg. |
| YES |
| 1. Is the Offeror not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for Federal Agency contract awards? |
| Section 6.1.1.h |
| 157 |
| |_| |
| 2. Does the Offeror meet the NAICS Code 561210 size standard (less than $38.5 million in average annual receipts)? |
| Section 6.1.1 |
Section 7.1.1.a 150-153
| 3. Has the Offeror submitted evidence of its status as a Small Business, SDB, HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB? |
| Section 7.2.1.4 |
| 171 |
| |_| |
| 4. Has Offeror refrained from taking exceptions to the solicitation or any requirements of the scope of work? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.11 |
| 167 |
| |_| |
| 5. Is the Solicitation Form (SF-1449) signed and dated? |
| Section 7.1.1.b |
Section 7.2.1.1
| 6. If Teaming Arrangement (Joint Venture or Partnership), has each member signed the SF-1449? |
| Section 7.2.1.3.b |
| 171 |
| |_| |
| 7. Minimum 60-day acceptance period for offer abided by? |
| Section 7.1.1.c |
| 167 |
| |_| |
| 8. Has the Offeror refrained from requesting use of Government-furnished property, materials, or information not provided for in the solicitation? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.11 |
| 167 |
| |_| |
| 9. Are all the Amendments signed and dated or acknowledged on the SF-1449?? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.9 |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 10. If Teaming Arrangement (Joint Venture or Partnership), has each member signed and dated all Amendments or acknowledged them on the SF-1449? |
| Section 7.2.1.3.b |
| 170 |
| |_| |
| 11. Has the correct number (1 Price / Business and 1 Technical) of proposals been submitted? |
| Section 7.4 |
| 172-173 |
| |_| |
| 12. Is the Price and Business Proposal a separate file from the Technical Proposal? |
| Section 7.4.b |
| 173 |
| |_| |
| 13. Are the proposals correctly formatted? |
| Section 7.2.1.7 |
Section 7.4
| 14. Is the Solicitation Line Item spreadsheet completely filled-out and matching the Line Items on the SF-1449? |
| Section 7.2.1.2 |
| 170 |
| |_| |
| 15. Has an Excel file and a PDF copy of the Solicitation Line Item spreadsheet been submitted? |
| Section 7.2.1.2 |
Section 7.4
| 16. Have all recurring monthly prices been rounded to the nearest dollar? |
| Section 7.2.1.2 |
| 170 |
| |_| |
| 17. If the Offeror has completed annual Reps and Certs in SAM.gov, have they completed only paragraph (b) for FAR 52.212-3? |
| Section 6.1.1 |
| 148 |
| |_| |
| 18. If the Offeror has not filed in SAM.gov, have they correctly filled-out all Representations and Certifications (FAR 52.212-3)? |
| Section 6.1.1 |
| 148-164 |
| |_| |
| 19. If Teaming Arrangement, has each member submitted Representations and Certifications (FAR 52.212-3) or indicate filed in SAM.gov? |
| Section 7.2.1.6 |
| 172 |
| |_| |
| 20. Did the Offeror submit the required Certified Financial Statements and Interim Reports, or GSA Form 527? |
| Section 7.2.1.5 |
| 171 |
| |_| |
| 21. If Teaming Arrangement, has each member submitted Certified Financial Statements and Interim Reports, or GSA Form 527? |
| Section 7.2.1.5 |
| 171 |
| |_| |
| 22. If Teaming Arrangement, has the entity submitted an executed copy of the agreement with original signatures? |
| Section 7.2.1.3 |
| 170-171 |
| |_| |
| 23. If Teaming Arrangement, does the agreement specify what resources each party will contribute? |
| Section 8.1.3 |
| 177 |
| |_| |
| 24. If Teaming Arrangement with Significant Subcontractor(s), are the roles and responsibilities of each Team Member explained? |
| Section 7.2.1.3.a |
| 171 |
| |_| |
| 25. Subcontracting appears to comply with FAR 52.219-14 service contract limit of 50% of prime personnel costs? |
| Section 4.1.2 |
Section 7.2.1.3.b
| 26. Technical Approach to Performing All Statement of Work Requirements narrative (25 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.i |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 27. Management Approach - Organizational Chart with Key Personnel (1 page max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 28. Management Approach - Staffing Plan (3 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 29. Management Approach - Key Personnel Resumes with licenses and certifications list (5 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 30. Management Approach - GSA's NCMMS Management narrative (2 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 31. Management Approach - Construction Management narrative (2 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 32. Management Approach - Proposed Subcontractors and Work to be Performed List (2 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 33. Management Approach - Quality Control Plan with Key Elements (5 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 34. Management Approach limit of 20 pages observed? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.ii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 35. Corporate Capability narrative of similar projects (7 pages max) submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.4.iii |
| 166 |
| |_| |
| 36. Has information (15 pages max) on no more than 3 Past Performance projects been submitted? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.10 |
| 167 |
| |_| |
| 37. If no Past Performance submitted, has the Offeror affirmatively stated no relevant Past Performance? |
| Section 7.1.1.b.10.i |
Section 8.1.1.a
| 38. Will the proposal be emailed with return receipt requested? |
| Section 7.4.A |
| 173 |
| |_| |
| 39. Does the proposal email abide by the 20 megabyte attachment limit? |
| Section 7.4.A |
| 173 |
| |_| |
| 40. If the proposal has been split into multiple emails, are the emails numbered as part of a series? |
| Section 7.4.A |
| 173 |
| |_| |
Signature:
Name Date Title Company
Note: This checklist is not intended to supersede or alter any of the requirements of the Solicitation, nor to serve as a comprehensive repository of all such requirements, but only to aid Offerors by highlighting common deficiencies and issues encountered in reviewing proposals. Offerors are solely responsible for reviewing and verifying all referenced requirements within the Solicitation itself.
image1.png
