RESPONSE Attachment V1.1.docx

DOCX document 231 KB Posted

Attached to
EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Construction - Salt Lake City VAMC Project 660-21-700
Solicitation number
36C77623B0041
Issued by

About this file

This document contains questions from a contractor regarding an access control portion of an EHRM infrastructure upgrades construction project at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center. The contractor is seeking clarification on access control doors, hardware sets, existing access control panels and readers, required functions and formats, and responsibilities for providing equipment. The project involves upgrading 37 doors with access control, using current HID RP40 readers and Software House iStar 16 panels. The contractor must field verify available inputs and outputs on existing panels, provide backup batteries, and install all new cabling for relocated or new doors while being allowed to splice existing cabling for doors with panels in the same location.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RESPONSE Attachment V5.1.docx DOCX document
Construction Wage Rates- Salt Lake County- 08-11-2023.pdf PDF
ADDENDUM No 01.pdf PDF
Bid opening call-in information.pdf PDF
RESPONSE Attachment V5.1 No. 30 Snippet.JPG JPG image
2017 AHERA 3-Year Reinspection v2.2 2017_1205_BT.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RESPONSE V10 - Technical Questions.docx DOCX document
RESPONSE Attachment V7.2.docx DOCX document
36C77623B0041 0004.pdf PDF
RESPONSE Attachment V2.1.docx DOCX document
RESPONSE Attachment V7.1.docx DOCX document
RESPONSE Attachment V3.1.docx DOCX document
36C77623B0041 0003.pdf PDF
36C77623B0041 0003.pdf PDF
36C77623B0041 0002.pdf PDF
660-21-700 PreConstruction Site Visit Sing In Sheet 2023 07 14.pdf PDF
36C77623B0041 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 13-Utah Tax Memo-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 7-Part 6 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 12-Construction Wage Rates-Salt Lake County- 04-14-2023.pdf PDF
Attachment 14-Limitations on Subcontracting-EHRM-Salt Lake City.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2-Part 1 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 15-Contractor Safety-Environmental-EHRM-S.L.C..docx DOCX document
Attachment 1-Specifications-(1 of 1)-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 6-Part 5 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 3-Part 2 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 9-Part 8 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 5-Part 4 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
36C77623B0041.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - Site Visit Instructions.pdf PDF
Attachment 11-Asbestos Site Survey-EHRM Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 10-Part 9 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 4-Part 3 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Attachment 8-Part 7 of 9-Drawings-EHRM-Salt Lake City.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

I am looking at the Access Control portion of the project, Division 281300. We are an authorized/certified dealer/installer for Software House, the facility’s current and specified system.

I am finding 37 doors of access control called out in the documentation. There are two hardware sets listed in the Division 87100. Set B01-3 and B03-6 (included below). In that division section is listed the door numbers. I have questions about all doors with added clarification on two. Should door GB24-14 be marked GA24-14? RESPONSE: Yes. Where is Door GB28-14? It is not shown in the documents. RESPONSE: It should be GA28-14 and is located in the same corridor, GA00-14, as GA24-14. It is the door to the new Biomed closet. Are there other doors requiring access control that are not indicated in the Division 8 specifications? RESPONSE: No new doors require access control at this time, however, door GA14C-03 will use hardware set B01-1 instead of B03-6 reducing the total number of doors with access control by 1.

Are there specific Software House models of panels are required by the facility? RESPONSE: Current panels are wall mount iStar 16 Panels.

Does the facility have sufficient licensing for these additions? RESPONSE: Yes. - AND OR - What is the current Software House license level and how many readers are currently in use?

Where in each building are the existing access control panels located? RESPONSE: See construction drawing set. Are there available reader, inputs and outputs on each existing panel in the associated areas for the new doors? RESPONSE: Awardee to field verify. During the on-site tour we were not allowed to open the existing access control panels. If new panels are required what room number do you want the panels located? RESPONSE: See construction drawing set.

The specifications instruct to match existing type of reader. The facility is currently using HID RP40 readers. Is there a sub-model required, what is the part number? Would they rather use HID’s new SIGNO class reader instead of the older RP40? RESPONSE: No. If you/they don’t know specific model numbers, what functions/credential formats are required? RESPONSE: SN200-82271-24V LNL have the reader, dps, and rex built in.

The Division 8 hardware sets show card reader “BY SECURITY INTEGRATOR.” Does this mean all other hardware is to be provided and installed by the Division 8 supplier? RESPONSE: Yes.

The Division 8 hardware sets show one power supply per door “AQD series.” Please confirm that this is what is wanted. Typically one power supply, sized appropriately will accommodate multiple doors if installed centrally. It is also more cost effective to use one centrally mounted power supply. There are no batteries indicated in the hardware specifications. Will battery backup be required? RESPONSE: Yes, backup batteries required. If required, who is to provide the back up batteries? RESPONSE: Integrator to supply backup batteries. System should use a common (sized appropriately) power supply for all door associated with said panel. To include battery back-up. Power supply per door not required.

Please indicate on the drawings where existing access control panels are currently and to where they will be required to be relocated if required. Please indicate how many current doors of access control are on each of the to be relocated panels. Will junction boxes and splicing of existing access control cabling be allowed for the relocated access control panels? Replacing all existing cabling to doors where the panel is being relocated will greatly increase the installation costs.

RESPONSE: Splicing not allowed. All new doors or relocated doors are to have new cable. If existing cabling can be pulled back to a new door without the need for splicing is allowed.

Doors
HW Set
1A04-01
B01-3
1A15A-01
B01-3
1D42B-01
B01-3
1E02-01
B01-3
2A11-01
B01-3
2C08-01
B01-3
3A11B-01
B01-3
3A11C-01
B01-3
3C08A-01
B01-3
4A05A-01
B01-3
4A11A-01
B01-3
4C08-01
B01-3
5B08A-01
B01-3
GA16-01
B01-3
GC01-01
B01-3
1A13B-03
B01-3
1B13-03
B01-3
2A15B-03
B01-3
2B07-03
B01-3
GA12C-03
B01-3
GB09-03
B01-3
1A02A-07
B01-3
2A08A-08
B01-3
1A15C-09
B01-3
1A16-14
B01-3
1C26-14
B01-3
2A17-14
B01-3
2C18A-14
B01-3
2C32-14
B01-3
3A08-14
B01-3
3C16-14
B01-3
BA04F-14
B01-3
GB24-14 / GA24-14?
B01-3
GB28-14
B01-3
GC31-14
B01-3
GA14C-03
B03-6B01-1
1A12-05
B03-6

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .