Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 56211: Waste Collection, FY2025
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 89% of FY2025 NAICS 56211 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $4,434,129,213 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 56211 or a code under it
- Contractors
- 937 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Ashbritt Inc. $1.83 billion, 39.7% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV · Free to reuse with credit to GovTribe (CC BY 4.0)
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ashbritt Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,830,121,525 | ||
| 2 | $1,743,744,486 | |||
| 3 |
JBW Group LLC
Top agencies
|
$234,464,362 | ||
| 4 |
Tmsab LLC
Top agencies
|
$169,307,091 | ||
| 5 | $55,280,128 | |||
| 6 | $18,321,610 | |||
| 7 | $17,346,523 | |||
| 8 | $13,745,349 | |||
| 9 | $10,406,915 | |||
| 10 | $9,907,172 | |||
| 11 |
Waste Management Collection and Recycling Inc
|
$9,523,211 | ||
| 12 | $9,056,585 | |||
| 13 | $8,694,476 | |||
| 14 | $8,661,187 | |||
| 15 |
Edco Disposal Corp
Top agencies
|
$8,198,618 | ||
| 16 | $6,929,937 | |||
| 17 |
Harold Lemay Enterprises Incorporated
|
$6,655,792 | ||
| 18 | $6,567,849 | |||
| 19 | $6,381,435 | |||
| 20 | $6,069,346 | |||
| 21 | $5,681,559 | |||
| 22 | $5,655,909 | |||
| 23 |
CTI Environmental Inc
Top agencies
|
$5,308,796 | ||
| 24 | $5,282,047 | |||
| 25 | $5,243,071 | |||
| 26 | $4,496,094 | |||
| 27 | $4,328,938 | |||
| 28 | $4,206,568 | |||
| 29 |
Wasteholdco 1 Limited
Top agencies
|
$4,048,530 | ||
| 30 |
Landscape Management Systems Inc.
|
$4,046,358 | ||
| 31 | $3,850,157 | |||
| 32 | $3,665,817 | |||
| 33 | $3,299,201 | |||
| 34 | $3,166,149 | |||
| 35 | $3,158,134 | |||
| 36 | $3,086,952 | |||
| 37 |
Native Services LLC
Top agencies
|
$3,011,795 | ||
| 38 |
Perikin Enterprises LLC
Top agencies
|
$2,918,557 | ||
| 39 |
Recology Inc.
|
$2,876,453 | ||
| 40 |
TLI Construction, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,573,961 | ||
| 41 | $2,535,605 | |||
| 42 | $2,522,334 | |||
| 43 |
Calista Corp
Top agencies
|
$2,434,602 | ||
| 44 |
Loop Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,295,919 | ||
| 45 |
Six-Nations Inc
Top agencies
|
$2,283,733 | ||
| 46 |
Noreas, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,238,458 | ||
| 47 |
Mellor Engineering Inc
Top agencies
|
$2,208,231 | ||
| 48 |
Syscom, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,115,683 | ||
| 49 |
Nisou Enterprises Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,091,332 | ||
| 50 | $2,035,213 | |||
| 51 | $2,033,082 | |||
| 52 | $1,999,712 | |||
| 53 |
Onaka-Nisiko JV
Top agencies
|
$1,978,667 | ||
| 54 |
Potomac Environmental Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,963,913 | ||
| 55 |
J Torres Co Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,962,432 | ||
| 56 |
Donato Marangi, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,916,108 | ||
| 57 | $1,915,986 | |||
| 58 |
Cook Inlet Region Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,878,488 | ||
| 59 | $1,850,435 | |||
| 60 | $1,847,259 | |||
| 61 | $1,820,344 | |||
| 62 | $1,803,934 | |||
| 63 |
Sagc-Dorado JV, LLC
Top agencies
|
$1,770,624 | ||
| 64 | $1,697,584 | |||
| 65 |
Haztrain Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,633,626 | ||
| 66 |
Birdon America Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,608,821 | ||
| 67 | $1,544,943 | |||
| 68 |
Nascence Group LLC
|
$1,465,208 | ||
| 69 |
City of Port Hueneme
Top agencies
|
$1,438,341 | ||
| 70 | $1,420,506 | |||
| 71 | $1,414,344 | |||
| 72 |
Ad Improvements Inc
|
$1,411,999 | ||
| 73 | $1,400,108 | |||
| 74 | $1,391,212 | |||
| 75 |
SWM LLC
Top agencies
|
$1,315,420 | ||
| 76 |
Comune DI Vicenza
Top agencies
|
$1,260,000 | ||
| 77 |
CCS King George 2 LLC
Top agencies
|
$1,193,760 | ||
| 78 | $1,160,187 | |||
| 79 | $1,153,669 | |||
| 80 |
County of Kitsap
Top agencies
|
$1,125,208 | ||
| 81 | $1,066,391 | |||
| 82 | $1,061,844 | |||
| 83 |
Comune DI Pisa
Top agencies
|
$1,055,637 | ||
| 84 |
Stericycle Inc
|
$994,262 | ||
| 85 | $993,462 | |||
| 86 |
N&S Property Services LLC
Top agencies
|
$981,850 | ||
| 87 | $979,841 | |||
| 88 | $961,320 | |||
| 89 | $953,996 | |||
| 90 | $944,737 | |||
| 91 |
Lane Services LLC
Top agencies
|
$922,937 | ||
| 92 | $919,672 | |||
| 93 | $912,796 | |||
| 94 | $897,457 | |||
| 95 |
Pureservice Corp
Top agencies
|
$897,080 | ||
| 96 | $880,958 | |||
| 97 |
Set the Standard, LLC
Top agencies
|
$879,604 | ||
| 98 |
Jaedong Environment
Top agencies
|
$862,177 | ||
| 99 |
Ahtna Solutions, LLC
Top agencies
|
$846,987 | ||
| 100 |
Cogetrina Logistics
Top agencies
|
$843,606 |
Show 75 more
100 of 937 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Rankings for the codes under NAICS 56211
| Code | Net obligations | Largest contractor |
|---|---|---|
| 562119 Other Waste Collection | $4,063,587,301 | Ashbritt Inc. |
| 562111 Solid Waste Collection | $299,135,141 | Hamilton Alliance Inc. |
| 562112 Hazardous Waste Collection | $71,406,771 | Republic Services Inc. |
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $4.61 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. An awardee whose own actions mostly name no parent, and that no other company's actions name as their parent, rolls up its SAM.gov registration's chain of parent companies: it counts under the first company there that other companies' actions name as their parent, or under the parent most of a company's own actions name, whichever comes first; with neither, under the highest company in the chain with federal contracts of its own. Joint ventures stay companies of their own. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2025 ran Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2024. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2024 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 56211 contractors in FY2025?
1. Ashbritt Inc. ($1.83B), 2. Environmental Chemical Corporation ($1.74B), 3. JBW Group LLC ($234M), 4. Tmsab LLC ($169M), 5. Bering Straits Native Corporation ($55.3M), 6. Republic Services Inc. ($18.3M), 7. Hamilton Alliance Inc. ($17.3M), 8. Perry Management Corp of South Dakota, L.l.c ($13.7M), 9. Yamaki Co., Ltd. ($10.4M), 10. Kurashiki, Co.,Ltd. ($9.91M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work