Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 236220: Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, FY2022
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 30% of FY2022 NAICS 236220 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $28,908,836,870 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 236220
- Contractors
- 3,366 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co $2.39 billion, 8.0% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $2,385,221,630 | |||
| 2 | $2,229,029,524 | |||
| 3 | $1,730,771,022 | |||
| 4 | $425,790,938 | |||
| 5 | $378,880,043 | |||
| 6 | $353,094,843 | |||
| 7 | $351,967,842 | |||
| 8 | $328,557,249 | |||
| 9 |
Itsi Gilbane Japan G.K.
|
$307,798,649 | ||
| 10 |
4Contractor JV
Top agencies
|
$291,560,624 | ||
| 11 | $266,175,112 | |||
| 12 | $241,673,341 | |||
| 13 | $232,537,988 | |||
| 14 |
Gilbane Smcc ECC LLC
Top agencies
|
$213,582,678 | ||
| 15 |
Sauer Holdings Inc.
|
$204,812,048 | ||
| 16 | $198,714,947 | |||
| 17 | $197,127,525 | |||
| 18 | $180,371,340 | |||
| 19 | $179,396,017 | |||
| 20 |
Balfour Beatty LLC
|
$172,153,137 | ||
| 21 | $168,928,480 | |||
| 22 |
Federal Contracting Inc.
Top agencies
|
$159,169,670 | ||
| 23 |
Aptim Federal Services LLC
|
$158,853,766 | ||
| 24 | $155,564,371 | |||
| 25 | $154,272,337 | |||
| 26 | $135,752,612 | |||
| 27 |
Guyco Inc
Top agencies
|
$134,099,447 | ||
| 28 | $131,852,782 | |||
| 29 |
JX Holdings Inc.
|
$130,645,762 | ||
| 30 |
AC JV One LLC
Top agencies
|
$128,193,852 | ||
| 31 |
M. a. Mortenson Companies Inc.
|
$120,174,877 | ||
| 32 |
MLU Services, LLC
Top agencies
|
$120,133,318 | ||
| 33 |
Korte -River City JV
Top agencies
|
$118,631,294 | ||
| 34 |
Rq-Aecom 2 JV
Top agencies
|
$116,178,202 | ||
| 35 | $114,012,275 | |||
| 36 | $110,539,306 | |||
| 37 | $106,231,810 | |||
| 38 | $103,086,568 | |||
| 39 | $92,766,548 | |||
| 40 |
NH1 JV
Top agencies
|
$91,528,217 | ||
| 41 | $91,342,494 | |||
| 42 | $90,695,727 | |||
| 43 |
Turner Construction Company
|
$89,778,086 | ||
| 44 | $86,009,818 | |||
| 45 |
Jccbg
Top agencies
|
$85,448,280 | ||
| 46 |
Tepa EC, LLC
Top agencies
|
$84,900,000 | ||
| 47 | $84,689,124 | |||
| 48 | $84,017,183 | |||
| 49 |
JV AFH Baumholder
Top agencies
|
$83,826,300 | ||
| 50 | $81,883,141 | |||
| 51 | $75,216,236 | |||
| 52 |
Acciona CMS JV LLC
Top agencies
|
$74,672,740 | ||
| 53 |
American International Contractors Inc.
|
$74,472,225 | ||
| 54 | $74,154,498 | |||
| 55 | $73,971,769 | |||
| 56 | $73,427,251 | |||
| 57 | $72,874,807 | |||
| 58 | $72,475,522 | |||
| 59 | $71,696,804 | |||
| 60 | $69,827,824 | |||
| 61 |
American Engineering Corporation
|
$67,360,382 | ||
| 62 |
Caddell Nova A JV
Top agencies
|
$66,541,440 | ||
| 63 | $63,627,410 | |||
| 64 | $61,830,718 | |||
| 65 |
Dobco Inc.
Top agencies
|
$61,487,153 | ||
| 66 | $61,261,715 | |||
| 67 | $59,563,064 | |||
| 68 | $59,280,883 | |||
| 69 | $58,403,974 | |||
| 70 | $57,906,828 | |||
| 71 | $55,715,554 | |||
| 72 | $55,707,910 | |||
| 73 | $55,344,161 | |||
| 74 |
Nana Regional Corporation Inc
|
$54,961,345 | ||
| 75 | $54,846,262 | |||
| 76 | $54,756,918 | |||
| 77 | $54,648,280 | |||
| 78 | $54,049,688 | |||
| 79 | $53,372,264 | |||
| 80 | $52,718,612 | |||
| 81 | $50,849,700 | |||
| 82 | $50,377,227 | |||
| 83 | $50,298,475 | |||
| 84 | $50,135,748 | |||
| 85 | $49,133,923 | |||
| 86 | $48,375,545 | |||
| 87 | $48,351,475 | |||
| 88 | $47,505,369 | |||
| 89 | $47,303,268 | |||
| 90 | $47,193,248 | |||
| 91 | $46,956,459 | |||
| 92 | $46,514,875 | |||
| 93 | $46,402,476 | |||
| 94 | $46,115,632 | |||
| 95 | $45,883,756 | |||
| 96 | $45,602,440 | |||
| 97 | $45,596,193 | |||
| 98 |
Intec Group LLC
Top agencies
|
$45,398,618 | ||
| 99 |
BB Government Services GMBH
|
$45,373,839 | ||
| 100 | $44,995,640 |
Show 75 more
100 of 3,366 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $29.7 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2022 ran Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2021. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2021 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 236220 contractors in FY2022?
1. Hensel Phelps Construction Co ($2.39B), 2. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. ($2.23B), 3. B.l. Harbert Holdings, L.L.C. ($1.73B), 4. Environmental Chemical Corporation ($426M), 5. RQ Construction, LLC ($379M), 6. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company ($353M), 7. Grunley Construction Co., Inc. ($352M), 8. Conti Federal Services, LLC ($329M), 9. Itsi Gilbane Japan G.K. ($308M), 10. 4Contractor JV ($292M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work