W912DS-17-R-0001_SOLICITATION_FOR_NCO_ACADEMY_COMPLEX_FORT_DRUM_NEW_YORK.pdf

a. Project: Non-Commission Officer's Academy (NCOA) Complex (45,670 SF).

b. Description: Primary structure includes barrack area, automated classrooms, general purpose administration area, organizational storage rooms arms and an auditorium.

c. This Procurement w ill be "Best Value, Trade-Off" utilizing FAR Part 15.

d. This Procurement is 100% Set Aside for Small Business (SB) Concerns. The Estimated Cost Range for this project is $15,000,000 and $25,000,000. NAICS CODE: 236220; Size Standard is $36,500,000.00.

e. Submit Proposals no later than the date and time stated in Block 13, or as amended to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contracting Division, Room 1843, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278-0090.

f. All Offerors are instructed to allow ample time to get thorugh security Security Check in order to have their Proposals delivered before 2:00 PM Eastern Standard time to the address above.

Note that Bid Bond w ill be required..

LORETTA E PARRIS 917-790-8182

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

14-Dec-2016

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______5 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________810 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, X negotiable. (See _________________________00 73 00

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________5 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________13 Jan 2017 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK

26 FEDERAL PLAZA, RM 1843

NEW YORK NY 10278-0090

W912DS

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

212 -264-3013FAX:TEL: (917)790-8173 TEL: FAX:

W912DS-17-R-0001 85

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section Supplies or Services and Price

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Base Item

FFP

All work (includes all plant, labor and material) for the construction of the NCO Academy Complex Facility (Building 4870) and the storage Facility (Building 4872) within their respective five-foot line described in the plans and specifications except for all work included in items in the below CLINs FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Section 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

0002 1 Job Base Item

FFP

All work (includes all plant, labor and material) outside the five-foot line of the building perimeter of Buildings 4870 and 4872 except for work included in items in the below CLINs

0003 1 Job Base Item

FFP

All work (includes all plant, labor and material) for the construction of the track and artificial turf.

0004 1 Job Base Item

FFP

All work (includes all plant, labor and material) for the demolition shown on Drawing C-102.

0005 1 Job Base Item

FFP

All work (includes all plant, labor and material) for the abatement of lead and asbestos for the building requiring demolition shown on Drawing C-102. (OMA Funded)

0006 1 Job Base Item

FFP

All work for the Final Record Drawing Submission. this Line Item is Pre-priced and cannot be changed. $100,000.00

TOTAL AMOUNT

Total Base Items: (CLINS 0001 – 0006) __________________

NOTES:

(1) Total Offer shall include all costs associated with each item number including all bonding, overhead and profit.

(2) Offerors must submit a price for every CLIN. Failure to do so may result in Offer being unacceptable.

(3) Line Item Number 0005 is pre-priced at $100,000.00, it’s a firm fixed line item, and the price shown may not be changed.

Section 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICE TO OFFEROR

CPARS

CPARS

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires that Past Performance Information (PPI) be collected on DoD Contracts. The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) is a web-enabled application the Supports the completion, distribution and retrieval of all contract performance evaluations. Contractor Representatives are responsible for reviewing and commenting on evaluations submitted on the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) website at https://www.cpars.gov/index.htm.

Veterans Employment Emphasis for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contracts

In addition to complying with the requirements outlined in FAR Part 22 .13, FAR Provision 52.222-38, FAR Clause 52.222-35, FAR Clause 52.222-37, DFARS 222.13 and Department of Labor regulations, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) contractors and subcontractors at all tiers are encouraged to promote the training and employment of U.S. veterans while performing under a USACE contract. While no set-aside, evaluation preference, or incentive applies to the solicitation or performance under the resultant contract, USACE contractors are encouraged to seek out highly qualified veterans to perform services under this contract. The following resources are available to assist USACE contractors in the outreach efforts:

Federal Veteran employment information at http://www.fedshirevets.gov/index.aspx Department of Labor Veterans Employment Assistance http://www.dol.gov/vets/ Department of Veterans Affairs-VOW to Hire Heros Act http://benefits.va.gov/vow/ Army Wounded Warrior Program http://wtc.army.mil/modules/employers/index.html U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation-Hiring Our Heros http://www.hiringourheroes.org/ Guide to Hiring Veterans-Reference Material http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/white_house_business_council_guide_to_hiring_veterans_0.pdf

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Electronic Submission: In addition to the hard copies required in block 13 of the Standard Form 1442, the offeror shall submit his proposal on a CD-ROM. Written portions of the proposal shall be in MS Word or Adobe Acrobat PDF format. The electronic version shall be either a single file tabbed in the same order as the hard copy or multiple files hyperlinked to a single table of contents. Any portion of the proposal not available in electronic format i.e. cut sheets, if applicable should be scanned in Adobe Acrobat format, thus making it available electronically. The CDROM must be clearly labeled by solicitation number, project name, installation, and offeror’s name. The CD-ROM shall be marked with a label stating “Unclassified/Controlled Unclassified Info.: In the event of any conflict between the electronic submission and the hard copy submission, the hard copy submission will govern and will be the material upon which the Government bases its evaluation and ultimately, its decision.

Electronic media may be submitted in an un-editable format.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2004 52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data or

Information Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

OCT 2010

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a FIRM FIXED PRICE contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS--SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY

2014)

(a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements,of this solicitation.

(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.

(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.

(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

Chief, Contracting Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 26 Federal Plaza, Room 1843 New York, NY 10278.

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:

Name: Tim Kelley; timothy.m.kelly@usace.army.mil

Address: Building 4849, Fort Drum, NY Telephone: 315-405-5853

Site Visit will start at 1030 hours at Building 4849 Jones Street. Note: All parties needing to be “Signed in” for access to Fort Drum shall meet at Route 26 Gate not later than 1000hrs.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/far http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of"(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any “Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR Chapter 201) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

252.204-7007 ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2015)

Substitute the following paragraphs (d) and (e) for paragraph (d) of the provision at FAR 52.204-8:

(d)(1) The following representations or certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM) database are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 252.209-7003, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus--Representation. Applies to all solicitations with institutions of higher education.

(ii) 252.216-7008, Economic Price Adjustment--Wage Rates or Material Prices Controlled by a Foreign Government. Applies to solicitations for fixed-price supply and service contracts when the contract is to be performed wholly or in part in a foreign country, and a foreign government controls wage rates or material prices and may during contract performance impose a mandatory change in wages or prices of materials.

(iii) 252.222-7007, Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking in Persons, as prescribed in 222.1771. Applies to solicitations with a value expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(iv) 252.225-7042, Authorization to Perform. Applies to all solicitations when performance will be wholly or in part in a foreign country.

(v) 252.225-7049, Prohibition on Acquisition of Commercial Satellite Services from Certain Foreign Entities-- Representations. Applies to solicitations for the acquisition of commercial satellite services.

(vi) 252.225-7050, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism. Applies to all solicitations expected to result in contracts of $150,000 or more.

(vii) 252.229-7012, Tax Exemptions (Italy)--Representation. Applies to solicitations when contract performance will be in Italy.

(viii) 252.229-7013, Tax Exemptions (Spain)--Representation. Applies to solicitations when contract performance will be in Spain.

(ix) 252.247-7022, Representation of Extent of Transportation by Sea. Applies to all solicitations except those for direct purchase of ocean transportation services or those with an anticipated value at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

(2) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated by the Contracting Officer: [Contracting Officer check as appropriate.]

____ (i) 252.209-7002, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by a Foreign Government.

____ (ii) 252.225-7000, Buy American--Balance of Payments Program Certificate.

____ (iii) 252.225-7020, Trade Agreements Certificate.

____ Use with Alternate I.

____ (iv) 252.225-7031, Secondary Arab Boycott of Israel.

____ (v) 252.225-7035, Buy American--Free Trade Agreements--Balance of Payments Program Certificate.

____ Use with Alternate I.

____ Use with Alternate II.

____ Use with Alternate III.

____ Use with Alternate IV.

____ Use with Alternate V.

(e) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the SAM Web site at https://www.acquisition.gov/. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by submission of the offer that the representations and certifications currently posted electronically that apply to this solicitation as indicated in FAR 52.204-8(c) and paragraph (d) of this provision have been entered or updated within the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer, and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201); except for the changes identified below ____ [offeror to insert changes, identifying change by provision number, title, date]. These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer.

FAR/DFARS Clause # Title Date Change

Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications located in the SAM database.

Section 00 24 00 - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION 00 22 10

APPENDIX D

SECTION 00 22 10 –SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

(Best Value Trade Off)

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS AND

ELEMENTS

4.1 VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

4.2 VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO-FORMA INFORMATION

5.0 VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

5.1 TAB A – FACTOR 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE

5.2 TAB B – FACTOR 2 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.3 TAB C – FACTOR 3 - PLANNING, SCHEDULING AND PHASING

6.0 VOLUME 2 - PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

6.1 GENERAL

6.3 TAB A – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND CONTRACT LINE

ITEM SCHEDULE)

6.4 TAB B – BID BOND

6.5 TAB C – SELF-PERFORMED WORK

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

7.2 EVALUATION

7.3 DEFINITIONS

7.4 EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

7.5 PAST PERFORMANCE (CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM)

ATTACHMENTS

1 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS PAST

2 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE PRIME CONTRACTOR OR KEY SUBCONTACTOR

3 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

1. OVERVIEW

This is a "Best Value – Tradeoff" solicitation in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.101-1 for the Construction of the FY16 Non-Commissioned Officer Academy (NCOA) Project located at Fort Drum, NY.

The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible firm, whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government.

The FY16 Non-Commissioned Officer Academy (NCOA) Project will construct communication, electrical, water, sanitary and natural gas utilities with supporting facilities. The location of the construction will be in the Cantonment Area of Fort Drum, New York.

2. BASIS OF AWARD

This is a Best Value Trade Off procurement. The Contracting Officer/SSA will award a firm fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer has determined conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than the price. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the target amount. There is no obligation to approach or match the target amount in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the target amount) would justify award to that Offeror.

The Target value for this project is $16,650,000.

2.1. As part of the evaluation, the Government will evaluate betterments in proposals relative to the minimum standards in the RFP to determine if they offer additional value to the Government. In addition, innovations in proposals will be evaluated to determine if creative ideas of the Offeror are a better value to the Government compared to the minimum criteria.

3. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. Submit proposals initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that firms will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals. Submit proposals in tabbed, three-ring binders.

1.2 Page Limit and Size of Printed Materials:

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer/PCO must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly address submission requirements as outlined below. The written portion of the proposal (Volume I - Technical Proposal), however, shall not exceed 75 pages. A page printed on two sides will be counted as two pages. Pages containing text shall be submitted on 8-1/2 x 11 inch paper. Schedules, Drawings and/or sketches may be submitted on paper not exceeding 11 x 17 inch paper, folded to not exceed 9 x 11 inch. Use of ‘TAB’ pages are encouraged to identify each section of the proposal and shall not count against proposal’s total page count. Each page of text shall be minimally single spaced with a minimum 12-point font and one inch margins all around.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND ELEMENTS

4.1 VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

4.2 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 4 PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

Vol. 2 TAB A N/A Price (Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Bid Schedules)

Not Rated

Vol. 2 TAB B N/A Bid Bond Not Rated

Vol. 2 TAB C N/A Self- Performed Work Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

GENERAL: The technical Factors consists of examples of Past Performance and Past Specialized Experience that meet the relevant magnitude and scope described below. Also a Summary Schedule for the contract duration with narrative showing all the elements described below.

5.2 VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

5.2.1 Contractor shall demonstrate three (3) projects not less than 75% complete or physically completed within the last seven (7) years. Relevant projects are those which are similar in magnitude and complexity. If a project is not relevant to both the Scope, Magnitude and complexity, the project will not be evaluated and as a result it will be considered Unacceptable. If an offeror receives less than a Satisfactory Confidence rating (at least

80% of the items listed on the Past Performance Questionnaire being Satisfactory or better rating) for Past

Performance it will be considered unacceptable and will not be considered for award. If the Government does not obtain past performance information and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance risk will be considered

“unknown”. An unknown rating will be considered acceptable for award.

Relevant Scope: Construction of individual projects or multiple Task Orders under a MATOC are acceptable, if each meets the criteria. Examples should be given for Magnitude and complexity of the following type projects to show relevant PAST PERFORMANCE.

Relevant Magnitude shall be at least ten (10) million dollars in construction value or at least 15,000 SF.

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance Vol 1 TAB A

Factor 1 Prime Contractor Past

Performance 1st (Most important Factor but not as important as 2 and 3 combined)

Vol 1 TAB B Factor 2 Prime Contractor Specialized Experience

2nd Most Important Factor (slightly less important than Factor 1)

Vol 1 TAB C Factor 3 Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

3rd Most Important Factor (slightly less important than Factor 2.)

Relevant Complexity: The construction of Barracks or Dormitories, School or facility with automated Classrooms, and or Facilities with administrative areas (administrative area must exceed 5000 SF of 10,000 sf facility).

Offeror’s shall include in their proposal Attachment 1 as listed below.

The Offeror shall provide the Contractor’s Past Performance questionnaire (attachment 1) to each Owner or Owner’s Technical Representative (OTR) for the projects listed under Volume 1. The OTR will input data and send back to the Offeror which is to be included within their proposal.

5.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.2.1 The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related performance of the prime contractor. Federal Government project performance will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project performance.

5.2.2.2 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview commercial owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s) or other personnel with knowledge of performance, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources. The relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project will not be evaluated or considered under this factor.

5.3. VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 2 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

5.3.1 Contractor shall demonstrate three (3) projects not less than 75% complete or physically completed within the last seven (7) years. These projects must be the same projects submitted for factor one Past Performance. Relevant projects are those which are similar in magnitude and complexity. Relevant projects are those which are similar in magnitude and complexity. The projects submitted for the prime contractor shall indicate they self-performed a minimum of 25% for each project. If a project is not relevant to both the Scope, Magnitude and complexity, the project will not be evaluated and as a result it will be considered unacceptable for Specialized Experience and will not be considered for award.

Relevant Scope: Construction of individual projects or multiple Task Orders under a MATOC are acceptable, if each meets the criteria. Examples should be given for Magnitude and complexity of the following type projects to show relevant SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE.

Relevant Magnitude shall be at least ten (10) million dollars in construction value or at least 15,000 SF.

Relevant Complexity: The construction of Barracks or Dormitories, Schools with automated Classrooms, and or Administrative Office Buildings.

5.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.3.2.1 The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related Specialized Experience of the prime contractor and/of Major Subcontractors. Federal Government project performance will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project performance. Conversely, proposals that do not include substantial evidence that the prime contractor has specialized experience to successfully construct the proposed project considered will not meet the minimum requirements of the RFP.

5.3.2.2 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience by reviewing the CPARS other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview commercial owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. The relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project will not be evaluated or considered under this factor.

5.4. VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 3 – Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

5.4.1.1. Planning and Scheduling. Describe the time control capabilities and systems to be used to plan the project and how the schedule will be used to manage construction from notice to proceed to completion of demolition.

Discuss internal procedures for handling delays to minimize time growth.

5.4.1.1.1. Submit a summary level schedule for new construction and required demolition. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab C. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01:

Project Schedule. The schedules shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features:

(1) The schedule shall at a minimum include the following activities: submission of quality control and safety plans; procurement for long lead material items; site and foundation; site utilities; building construction addressing at a minimum Steel, Masonry, Mechanical systems, Electrical/Communications, Finishes, Mechanical Testing and

Balancing, Whole Building Commissioning and other critical closeout activities such as-built, etc..

(2) Submission must include the following for each activity: activity duration (activity duration not to exceed 20 days) early start, early finish, late start and late finish, float, predecessors and successors. This information can be provided in table format or graphically.

(3) Schedule should show turnover of new facility and phasing of demolition activities. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(4) Submit narrative discussing the projects critical path. Ensure critical path is shown graphically. Discuss critical path activities that have the greatest risk to project delivery. Discuss how your schedule mitigates those risks and what measures you will take to ensure the project is delivered on time.

(5) Submit narrative discussing submittal procedures and linkage of submittal register to scheduled activities.

Discuss how the schedule accounts for management of the submittal process and lead time is reflected in the submittal register to meet activity early start date. Discuss internal procedures for preventing late submittal submission to minimize time growth.

(6) Constraints: Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Discuss how winter weather conditions at Fort Drum are taken into considerations in your planning and scheduling.

5.4.1.2 PHASING.

5.4.1.2.1 Submit a Site phasing plan for both new construction and demolition activities.

5.4.2. Evaluation Criteria

5.4.2.1. The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the plan focused on logic, task duration and critical path. The Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding and the capability to execute the project as presented in the narrative required in the submission. Some additional specific evaluation considerations are listed below. This list is not all-inclusive.

5.4.2.1.1. Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for new construction and demolition. The length of the schedule can match the proposed contract duration but not exceed it. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it is binding. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., long lead items, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of all elements required in the submission and the offeror's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

5.4.2.1.2. Phasing: The Government will evaluate the phasing plans for the site work, the building and the demolition. The phasing plans will be evaluated to determine if they are advantageous to the Government or if they add additional risk for unsuccessful performance.

6.0 VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

GENERAL: Submit the Pro Forma information in a separate envelope labeled: “Volume 2 – Pro Forma Requirements.”

6.1 VOLUME 2 TAB A – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE).

Submission Requirements: Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the CLIN Schedule, containing proposed line item and total pricing, as well as the proposed contract duration. See instructions in Section 00 21 16, “Instructions to Offerors”.

6.1.1 Evaluation Criteria: Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Firms are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

6.1.2 If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

6.1.3 Award may not be made for project cost for design and construction exceeding the price target described herein.

6.2 VOLUME 2 TAB B – BID GUARANTEE

6.2.1 Submission Requirements Submit the Bid Bond in accordance with the solicitation request for proposals.

6.2.2 Evaluation requirements:

This item is not rated. The Government will review the Bid Bond for legal sufficiency. The Bond must be legally sufficient.

6.3 VOLUME 2 TAB C – SELF- PERFORMED WORK

6.3.1 Submission Requirements:

6.3.1.1 The Firm shall confirm that it understands and that it shall perform the amount of work required to be self-performed, in accordance with the appropriate clause in Section 00 72 00 that applies to the contract performance (see Section 00 73 00 for a description of the applicable clause for self-performance of work).

6.3.2 Evaluation Requirements:

6.3.2.1 This item is not rated. In order to assure adequate interest in and supervision of all work, the Contractor shall be required to perform a significant part of the contract with its own forces. This public policy is expressed in various Statutes, as well as in the Federal Acquisition Regulations and in the Small Business Administration Code of Federal Regulations. The Firm must confirm that it understands the amount of work performed, based on the status of the firm, and that it will self-perform the required amount of work with its own forces. This is also a statutory requirement for any set-aside for Small Business or Small Disadvantaged Business or Hubzone firms before contract award can be made.

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

7.1.1 The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal and any subsequent discussions required, as well as information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The SEB will not consider any information incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

7.2 EVALUATION

7.2.1 The SSEB will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus rating for the evaluation factor.

7.2.2 The Government intends to award without discussions. Firms are cautioned to put forth their best efforts, and to furnish all information clearly to allow the Government to evaluate proposals. Firms should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in their proposal after submitting it.

7.2.3 A “Competitive Range” is a subjective determination of the most highly rated proposals in the event that the Government decides that discussions with competing firms are required or are considered to be in the Government’s best interests. In such an event, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range of all the most highly rated proposals.

7.2.4 If discussions are held, the Government may engage in a broad give and take with those firms in the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 15.306 (d). The Government will provide the Firm an advance agenda for the discussions. During discussions, the Government may ask the Firm to further explain its proposal and to answer questions about it.

7.2.5 Upon conclusion of discussions, those firms still considered the most highly rated, will be afforded an opportunity to submit their proposal revisions for final evaluation and selection.

7.3 DEFINITIONS

7.3.1 Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

7.3.2 Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance

7.3.3 Significant Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance

7.3.4 Strength: Any aspect of a proposal that, when judged against a stated evaluation criteria, enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

7.3.5 Significant Strength: A significant strength appreciably enhances the merit of a proposal or appreciably enhances the probability of successful contract performance.

7.3.6 Deviation: Proposal implies or specifically offers a deviation below the specified criteria. The firm may or may not have called the deviation to the Government’s attention. A deviation is a deficiency. The proposal must conform to the solicitation requirements for award.

7.4 EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

7.4.1 General: The Government will review the proposals and rate the quality of each evaluation factor and subfactor(s). The SSEB will rate each proposal against the specified evaluation criteria in the Solicitation requirements. They will not compare proposals at this time. After all proposals are rated, the Government will compare the ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages of proposals against each other in order to rank order the Offerors based on the judgment of the SSEB and present their findings to the Contracting Officer.

7.4.2 Review Write-up: The Government will support each rating with a narrative, separately listing all strengths or advantages, weaknesses or disadvantages, deficiencies, and required clarifications.

7.4.3 Rating System: After listing proposal strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies, the SSEB will assign an adjective rating of “Outstanding”, “Good”, “Acceptable”, “Marginal”, or “Unacceptable” to each factor and subfactor, which reflect the Government's confidence in each offeror's technical ability, as demonstrated in its proposal, to perform the requirements stated in the RFP. The adjectival ratings shall be assigned, using the following criteria:

(a) Outstanding: Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths.

(b) Good: Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength.

(c) Acceptable: Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

(d) Marginal: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

(e) Unacceptable. Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable.

7.5 PAST PERFORMANCE (CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM)

7.5.1 Past Performance Risk Ratings assess the risks associated with an Offeror's likelihood of success in performing the requirements stated in the RFP based on the Offeror's demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts. Performance Confidence Assessment (Overall) Rating System:

(a) Substantial Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(b) Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(c) Neutral Confidence: No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance

(d) Limited Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(e) No Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a) (2) (IV)).

Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, "unknown" shall be considered ·'acceptable.'·

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

SECTION 00 22 10 - ATTACHMENT 1

Name of Solicitation:

Name of Firm:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

DUNS # (CPARS)

Also provide any other assigned number that identifies the member firm(s) in the CPARS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must also be submitted. Provide a DUNS number for each company identified in any proposed Contractor-subcontractor association of firms. If the firm is a joint venture or contractor-subcontractor association of firms, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association. Provide DUNS for each.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Firm 3:

Nature of Association:

AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

[List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.]

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

W912DS-17-R-0001

SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

PRIME CONTRACTOR OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR

SECTION 00 22 10 - ATTACHMENT 2

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last seven years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

Type of Dental/Medical Facility Represented_____________ ___________________________

Your Firm’s Name: _____________________________________________________________

Name of Project_______________________________________________________________

Location of Project_____________________________________________________________

Owner ______________________________________________________________________

General Scope of Construction Project _____________________________________________

Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self-Performed:

Construction Cost _____________________________________________________________

Did this project include LEED (Bronze, Silver, Gold or Platinum) _________________________

Percent of Work Self Performed ___________________________________________________

Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out _____________________________________

Dates Construction: Began______________________ Completed_______________________

Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known ____________________________________

Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages? _____________________________

(If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company) __________________________

Current Telephone Number of Reference __________________________________________ Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE

AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE

COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A…