Attach_L_-_2_PPQ.pdf

SECTION L, ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation W9124R-15-R-0001 Installation Support Services

Directorate of Public Works, Yuma Proving Ground, Yuma, AZ

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

The Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Joint Base Lewis-McChord are in the process of selecting a contractor for Installation Support Services, Directorate of Public Works, Yuma Proving Ground, Yuma, AZ.

The contractor shall be required to provide DPW services to include: preventive maintenance and repair of facilities, real property, and test sites; support of Unaccompanied Personnel Housing; grounds keeping;

engineering design; wastewater collection; sanitary landfill operation; heating and air conditioning maintenance and repair; water treatment and distribution; pest control; and test site support.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

The past performance questionnaire will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the Solicitation’s requirements, on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, as indicated by that offeror’s record of past performance.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Please complete this survey and return directly to contract specialist, Jean L. Birdsell, via email to usarmy.jblm.acc-micc.list.proposals@mail.mil, by 2:00 PM PST, 15 May 2017. Thank you!

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost (If other than the awarded price):

mailto:usarmy.jblm.accmicc.list.proposals@mail.mil

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

IDIQ or Requirements:

Cost Type Fee Associated Scope Change

Other(if applicable):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Recency

1. Please check the appropriate box below to determine if this past performance is in regards to a contract that is within 5 years of this date: 31 MAR 17.

Yes No

2. Please check one of the following blocks to refine your response to the question above:

More than 9 months old, and less than 3 years old 3 years old, and less than 4 years old 4 years old, and less than 5 years old Less than 9 months old

Relevancy

Please place a “X” in the box next to any/all of the task below that the contractor performed for your customer(s). Please comment regarding any pertinent information regarding the performance of these tasks and the satisfaction of the service. The Government seeks to determine the ability of the submitting contractor to perform in areas that are critical to the potential services that are required in support of the award.

Repair of Electrical Systems and Equipment

Repair of Heating Plants and Equipment Repair Water Supply Distribution Systems Repair of Sanitary Sewage Collection Systems Repair of Air Conditioning/Refrigeration Plants and Evaporative Cooling Systems Repair of Structures and Facilities Grounds Maintenance Heavy Equipment Operations Sanitary Landfill Operations Food Service Equipment Maintenance and Repair Pest Control Unaccompanied Personnel Housing (UPH) Operations Emergency Repair Animal Control Management Installation and Repair of Equipment in Place (EIP) Qualified Recycling Program Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants Facility Maintenance Recycling Services Cathodic Protection

Comments:

Magnitude

This factor will be evaluated by identifying the awarded price (at the time of the award, and/or by the end date or current expenditure if an active contract). The Government expects that a magnitude of effort in dollars will provide insight and understanding of the offerors’ past performance with differing sizes of contracts. Awarded dollars can be equated to the scope and frequency of an overall effort. Please place an “X” in the appropriate block for the value of the contract, and leave any comments that are appropriate.

At the time of award:

$36 + million:

$21-$35 million:

$6-$20 million:

0-$5 million:

At the current time or at time of Close:

$36 + million:

$21-$35 million:

$6-$20 million:

0-$5 million:

Management

Management is considered the General Overall approach that demonstrates the ability of the vendor to integrate with the Government team, build working relationships, manage to meet the mission, and deliver services when and where required (within the terms and conditions of the PWS and Contract Terms). This factor is subjective and based completely upon the submitter’s overall perceived, supportable, position regarding the experience they have had and the opinions they have formed. The Government seeks to evaluate this information to gain a broad determination of how the proposing vendor conducts operations within the broad categories listed below.

The contractor:

* Employs adequate workforce (Prime and Subcontracted labor), with workflow process and clear lines of communication for all functional areas.

* requires little oversight for simple tasks and can work through complex tasks as a team with the customer.

* uses acceptable methods of quality control and achieves the customer's level of required service frequently.

* implements and manages price control practices that are consistent with fair and reasonable pricing, as well as good stewardship of costs.

* responds in a timely manner in regards to the customer's need, delivery of projects within an acceptable time frame, meeting the needs of the customer per scheduled task, call out, task order or other contractual requirement.

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block below, and leaving any comments that further explain your choice.

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

Very Satisfied S Satisfied SS Somewhat Satisfied LS Less than Satisfied

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been/being partially or completely terminated for default, convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

Yes____ No ____

Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Please complete this survey and return directly to contract specialist, Jean L. Birdsell, via email to usarmy.jblm.acc-micc.list.proposals@mail.mil, by 2:00 PM PST, 15 May 2017. Thank you!

mailto:usarmy.jblm.accmicc.list.proposals@mail.mil