MAPS Draft 5 RFP Slides - 12MAR2026.pdf

PDF 694 KB Posted

Attached to
MAPS RFP Draft 5, Virtual Listening Session & Survey! Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W15P7T-25-R-MAPS
Issued by
Department of the Army

About this file

This document is a presentation from the U.S. Army's ACC-APG (Army Contracting Command – Augusta, Georgia) outlining changes to the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) contract from Draft 4 to Draft 5, presented during a virtual listening session on March 12, 2026. MAPS is a professional services indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract designed to procure services across three technical domains: Engineering, Logistics, and Operational Services; Emerging IT; and Business Transformation. The solicitation will be released at the end of March/beginning of April 2026, with proposals due by end of April 2026 and awards expected by end of July/beginning of August 2026. The contract structure provides for 70 total awardees per domain, broken down as 30 Large Businesses (with 15 reserved for Emerging Large Businesses), 25 Small Businesses, and 15 Commercial-Sector Vendors.

Key changes from Draft 4 include: increasing awardees from 50 to 70 per domain; introducing Emerging Large Business (ELB) status for entities not exceeding $50 million average annual revenue over three years that became other-than-small within the past five years; reducing the minimum guarantee from $500 to $100 (satisfied by attendance at a government-hosted postaward meeting); removing the 50 percent bid-rate off-ramp criteria; establishing pricing analysis methodology with a fair and reasonable range of $50–$100 for the minimum guarantee order; allowing subcontracts for Small Businesses, ELBs, and Commercial-Sector Vendors only; introducing two Qualifying Project (QP) types (Level-of-Effort and Outcome-Based) with distinct evaluation criteria; updating evaluation criteria to include Passthrough Rate and removing Agreements and certain systems requirements; and adjusting dollar value thresholds by business size. All proposals are evaluated on non-price technical factors first, with price reasonableness assessed only for the highest-rated proposal. The government encourages industry participation in a released survey (https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/5dh7zSU8hz) as the timeline is data-driven and contingent on survey results. Inquiries may be directed to usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MAPS RFP Draft 5, Virtual Listening Session & Survey!, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 0001 Cover Letter 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 Qualifying Project 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
MAPS Request For Proposal (RFP) Draft 5 - 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Summary of Changes to Draft 5 - 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Large Businesses - 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Emerging Large Businesses - 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Small Businesses - 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Commercial-Sector Vendors - 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 PPQ Form 10MAR2026.pdf PDF
January 2026 Industry Update QA_Industry Update NON MAPS answered - Final.pdf PDF
ACC APG Industry Update Consolidated FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment 0001 Cover Letter Form 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard Large Business 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 Systems Agreements and Certifications Form Small Business 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
MAPS Request For Proposal (RFP) Clean Draft 4 - 23JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 Systems Agreements and Certifications Form Large Business 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 Qualifying Project Form 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard Commercial-Sector Vendors 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 Systems Agreements and Certifications Form Commercial-Sector Vendors 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
MAPS Request For Proposal (RFP) Tracked Changes Draft 4 - 23JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Scorecard Small Business 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0006 PPQ Form 22JAN2026.pdf PDF
Information Flyer.pdf PDF
Industry Update Portion.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ACC-APG

MARKETPLACE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (MAPS) VIRTUAL

LISTENING SESSION

DATE: 03/12/2026

UNCLASSIFIED | FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

2BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

AGENDA

▪Disclosures ▪Key Notes ▪Proposed Timeline ▪Summary of Changes to Draft #5

3BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

DISCLOSURES

OVERVIEW OF CHANGES FROM

DRAFT 4 TO DRAFT 5 ONLY

EVERYTHING IS NOTIONAL AND IS

NOT TO BE CONSIDERED BINDING

OFFERORS SHALL REFER ONLY TO

THE FINAL SOLICITATION

4BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

KEY NOTES

▪ Commercial-Sector Vendor:

– MAPS Definition is independent from that of a “nontraditional defense contractor” as defined in the U.S. Code. Distinction is necessary as the USC definition is exclusively associated with Other Transaction Agreements, a category under which MAPS does not fall.

▪ MAPS is intended to be a Professional Services Contract to obtain services, not to develop commercial capabilities.

▪ Survey: Participation in the released survey is encouraged; all responses will be carefully reviewed.

https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/5dh7zSU8hz

▪ Timeline: While we understand that the timeline is extremely important, our timeline is 100% data driven, so our timeline has a direct correlation with survey results.

https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/5dh7zSU8hz

5BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

PROPOSED TIMELINE

March 12, 2026

Virtual Listening Session

End of March/ Beginning of April 2026

Solicitation Release

End of April 2026

Proposal Due Date

End of July/Beginning of August 2026

MAPS Award

▪ NOTE: Timeline is contingent upon Survey Results

6BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS

LB Large Business

ELB Emerging Large Business

SB Small Business

CSV Commercial-Sector Vendors

QP Qualifying Project

FFP Firm Fixed Price

AQL Acceptable Quality Level

7BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

HIGHLIGHTED CHANGES

Category Draft 4 Draft 5 Awardees 50 per Domain 70 per Domain

Emerging Large Businesses N/A Awarding 15 per Domain

Minimum Guarantee $500 $100

Off Ramp Criteria To include 50% bid rate 50% bid rate removed

Highest Rated Technical Offeror N/A Offerors will be award based on highest rated technical proposal

Evaluation of Price N/A FFP Price Analysis for a Government hosted postaward meeting

Subcontracts Not allowed for QPs Allowed for SBs, ELBs and CSVs only

Technical Domain N/A Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services Domain

Dollar Values All business sizes were $25M minimum Each Business size has new thresholds

LOE Based QPs and Outcome Based QPs N/A Included definitions and evaluation criteria base on QP type

Evaluation Criteria

Systems, Agreements and Certifications, Recency, Relevance, NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality, Dollar Value, Vacancy Rate, Time-to-Fill Rate

Removed Agreements, and added Passthrough Rate, Schedule and Completeness

8BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

VOLUMES

VOLUME I – COVER

LETTER

VOLUME II – SCREENING

QUESTIONS AND

SCORECARD

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE

VOLUME IV – SMALL

BUSINESS

SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

(LB ONLY)

9BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

TOTAL NUMBER OF AWARDEES

▪ Increasing from 50 to 70

▪ Ensure best of the best are awarded while fostering a competitive ecosystem through a manageable IDIQ.

10BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

OFF-RAMPING & DOMAIN UPDATES

Based on Industry feedback the following updates were made:

▪ Off-Ramp Criteria

– Removed 50% Bid-Rate

▪ Renamed Technical Domain

– Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services Domain

▪ Emerging IT Domain: Performance Quality Technical Capabilities Updated

– Removed Intelligent Automation (AI/Robotic Pre-Automation), Infrastructure, Services Platform, and

Infrastructure Cloud Services and Telecommunications/Systems Operation and Maintenance

11BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

EMERGING LARGE BUSINESS (AKA MID-TIER COMPANIES)

▪ An entity, to include parent and affiliates, that is not a small business under the applicable Small

Business Administration size standard for the proposed Domain, has become other-than-small business within the last five years from the final RFP solicitation date, and has an average annual revenue not exceeding $50M over the last 3 years.

▪ All evaluation criteria updated to include ELBs

▪ Focus is on maintaining a balanced and competitive procurement environment. By including “Emerging Large Business” it further allows for a diverse pool of qualified vendors, and ensures a robust, competitive, and diverse industrial base.

12BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

HIGHEST TECHNICAL RATED OFFEROR & MINIMUM GUARANTEE

▪ Highest Technical Rated Offeror

– All proposals will be evaluated based on non-price factors to identify the highest technically rated offeror. Following that, the price of the highest-rated proposal will be assessed to ensure it is both fair and reasonable.

▪ Minimum Guarantee

– The minimum guarantee will be satisfied by the first order, which is for attendance of two (2) individuals to participate in a Government hosted virtual postaward meeting after award of base contract.

Propose FFP to Attend

Postaward Meeting

Is Proposed Price Fair and Reasonable?

Attend Postaward

Meeting

$100 Minimum Guarantee Satisfied

13BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

▪ Offeror must propose a FFP for attendance of two (2) individuals to participate in a Government hosted virtual postaward meeting after award of base contract

▪ Keep it simple: No cost buildup, no supporting documentation

▪ Highest Rated Technical Offeror = No Tradeoffs

What is Evaluated Total FFP submitted on Attachment 0001

Analysis Method Price Analysis to determine fair and reasonableness

Fair & Reasonable Range $50 - $100

Results Not Fair and Reasonable Not eligible for award; next highest rated offeror is evaluated

PRICE ANALYSIS

14BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

JOINT VENTURES

Added clarifying language for JVs in section L.1.1.3 to include:

▪ Members of JVs can propose as a JV or a single offeror under each Domain but cannot propose as both.

▪ JVs shall provide a copy of their agreement with Attachment 0001 Cover Letter

– Must list the specific systems that the JV is operating under

JVs Certifications JV Entity Rely on Managing Partner Other

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 X X

Government Determined Acceptable Business Systems

Unpopulated JVs Populated JVs

Facility Clearance X

CMMC X

Presenter Notes Presentation Notes FCL: The JV Entity can hold the FCL; OR whichever member is performing the security work must have the FCL CMMC: The JV Entity can hold the FCL; OR whichever member is processing, storing or transmitting data Govt Determined Systems: Populated JVs must have their own government determined systems

15BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

QUALIFYING PROJECT UPDATES

▪Subcontracts as QP

– Permitted only for SBs, ELBs and CSVs

▪Types of QPs: LOE and Outcome –The QP Type will be selected on Attachment 0003 QP Form, and –The Government or Private Official is required to certify the QP Form

16BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

EVALUATION CRITERIA PER QP TYPE

▪ Definition

– Requires results, definite goal or target, or performance outcomes/end-product to be achieved.

▪ Contract Types

– FFP (except LOE Term)

– CPFF Completion Form

– Grants

– Agreements

▪ Definition

– Provide a stated number of labor hours or full-time equivalents over a defined period of time with payments based on the effort expended.

– Contract Types

– Cost Reimbursement

(except CPFF Completion Form)

– FFP LOE Term

– T&M

– Labor Hour

17BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

OUTCOME VS LOE QP TYPES

▪ Outcome

▪ Schedule

– Timeliness/delivery of the service outcome as identified in the contract/agreement.

– (Actual Delivery / Contractual Delivery) *100

– AQL is 100% of Project Schedule has been met

▪ Completeness

– Completeness against the project requirements as identified in the contract/agreement, as well as customer recognized efficiencies.

– Recognized efficiency must show measurable improvements tied to results.

– AQL is 100% of requirements fulfilled.

▪ LOE

▪ Vacancy

– Vacant positions for the last full year of performance.

– (# of vacant positions at the end of the last full year of performance of QP / # of positions proposed) *100

▪ Time-to-Fill

– Average time to fill any vacant positions for the last full year of performance.

– Date Offer Acceptance – Date Vacancy Opened =

Time-to-Fill

18BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

SCORECARD

▪ Systems and Agreements

– Removed Government Approved Rate Agreements

– Removed Government Determined Acceptable Earned Value Management System

▪ Screening Questions combined into the Scorecard Attachment 0002

▪ Overall points have been redistributed

– All Business Sizes can earn 130,000.00 points

– Reduced points allocated towards Vacancy and Time-to-Fill Rates

▪ Dollar Values Updated Dollar Values SBs & CSVs ELBs LBs

1,000 points Between $2.5M and $5M Between $2.5M and $10M Between $2.5M and $25M

2,000 points Between $5M and $10M Between $10M and $25M Between $25M and $50M

4,000 points Over $10M Over $25M Over $50M

19BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

SCORECARD

▪ Passthrough Rate

– The passthrough rate will be calculated by the total Subcontractor Labor Dollars divided by the Total Labor Dollars for each QP.

▪ Commercial-Sector Vendors Recency

– CSV QPs shall be complete and have to occurred in the last four (4) years prior to the final solicitation release, if a CSV QP is within two (2) years of the final solicitation release they will earn 1,000 points

Passthrough Rate

6,000 points Per QP if the Subcontractor performed between 0 to 30.00% of the work

2,500 points Per QP if the Subcontractor performed greater than 30.00% but less than/equal to 50.00% of the work

1,000 points Per QP if the Subcontractor performed greater than 50.00% but less than/equal to 65.00% of the work

Zero (0) points Per QP if the Subcontractor performed greater than 65.00% of the work

20BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

CSV TIE BREAKER

21BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

OTHER CHANGES

▪ APG Vendor Report

– Added APG Vendor Report requirement for Cost Plus Fixed Fee Term CLINs

▪ Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCRAFT) System Reporting

– Added eCRAFT requirement for Cost-Reimbursement Type CLINS

▪ Attachment 0003 – Qualifying Project Form

– Requires that a Government/Private Official signature is required to verify all information

22BE ALL YOU CAN BE16 March 2026

INDUSTRY FEEDBACK OPPORTUNITY

Survey:

Please complete the below survey https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/5dh7zSU8hz

MAPS Email Box usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/5dh7zSU8hz mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil mailto:usarmy.apg.acc.mbx.acc-apg-maps-contracting-office@army.mil

THANK YOU.

Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) Virtual listening session
Agenda
Disclosures
Key Notes
Proposed Timeline
Commonly Used Acronyms
Highlighted Changes
Volumes
Total number of awardees
Off-Ramping & Domain Updates
EMERGING LARGE BUSINESS (aka mid-tier companies)
Highest Technical Rated offeror & Minimum guarantee
Slide Number 13
Joint ventures
Qualifying Project Updates
evaluation criteria PER QP Type
Outcome vs loe QP Types
SCORECARD
SCORECARD
CSV tie breaker
Other changes
Industry Feedback opportunity
Slide Number 23

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .