Proposal_Score_Sheet_BPM003384.xlsx_-_drodriguez.pdf
PDF 288 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR057596
- Contract number
- CTR057596
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
The document is a Request for Statement of Qualification (SOQ) for Hydro Engineering Services, issued by the Arizona Game and Fish Department under Solicitation BPM003384. The SOQ evaluates proposals from multiple engineering and environmental consulting firms, including Cardno Inc, DOWL Hkm, J2 Engineering and Environmental Design LLC, JE Fuller Hydrology & Geomorphology Inc, Natural Channel Design Inc, NextGen Engineering Inc, Stantec Consulting Services Inc, Tetra Tech Inc, and Wilson & Co.
The evaluation matrix scores each offeror across five key criteria: Project Experience (40 points), Overall Experience (20 points), Design Philosophy and Process/QA/QC (15 points), Common Problems (15 points), and Overall Quality of Proposal (10 points). The scoring resulted in a ranked list of proposals, with DOWL (78 points) and Wilson & Co. (74 points) receiving the highest scores. The document includes a signed evaluation by Jose Daniel Rodriguez, the Watercraft Law Enforcement Programs Coordinator, dated 6/8/2021, who provides a final ranking of the nine competing firms based on their total point scores.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offerors
ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT
M ax im um
P oi nt s
C ar dn o
In c
D ow l H km
J 2 E ng in ee rin g an d En vi ro nm en ta l D es ig n
LL
C
JE
F ul le r H yd ro lo gy
G eo m or ph ol og y In c
N at ur al
C ha nn el
D es ig n In c
N ex tG en
E ng in ee rin g
In c
St an te c
C on su lti ng
Se rv ic es
In c
Te tra
T ec h In c
W ils on
C o.
Request for Statement of Qualification for Hydro Engineering Services Solicitation BPM003384
Evaluator's name:
Project Experience 40 28
Overall Experience 20 16
Design Philosophy, Process, QA/QC 15 12
Common Problems 15 12
Overall Quality of Proposal 10 10
TOTAL POINTS 100 78 70 60 68 46 48 58 62 74
I hereby attest that the points awarded to each bidder listed above were scored in accordance with the established evaluation criterita and represent my best judgement of the bidder's proposal. As indicated by the highest total score, my ranking of the proposals are:
DOWL - 3 JE Fuller - 4 Wilson -2 CARDO -1 TETRA -5
Stantec - 7 NEXT Gen - 8 J2 - 6 NATURAL - 9
SIGNATURE
Jose Daniel Rodriguez Watercraft Law Enforcement Programs Coordinator
PRINTED NAME TITLE
DEPARTMENT DATE
Arizona Game and Fish Department 6/8/2021
1. Project Experience (Maximum 40 Points) -List of relevant projects completed within the last 5 years. Please list the location of the project and the personnel who worked on that project that would be working with AGFD. Please list what items of work which that person was responsible for on that project. Please do not list items that were consulted out. A resume should be provided for each person listed. Resumes will not be part of the page count.
2. Overall experience. (Maximum 20 Points) Provide any relevant organizational charts, resumes, and projects created as a team. Please list what design services will be performed in house versus subcontracted. Provide a list of all sub-consultants.
3. Design Philosophy (Maximum 15 Points) Provide factors your firm would consider for each study or design for each category.
4. Common Problems (Maximum 15 Points) List the common problems that you have seen with each criteria or challenges to design. How you have overcome these problems. Provide reference for projects listed with company/agency name, contact person and phone number
5. Overall Quality of Proposal (Maximum 10 Points)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .