1_-_Final_ACM_HazMat_SurveySummary_FOVA_041414KMA.PDF

Prepared by:

White Shield, Inc.

320 N 20th Avenue Pasco, WA 99301

509‐547‐0100 Phone 509‐547‐8292 Fax

Hazardous Materials Survey

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Building 404 and Building 987 Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

320 N 20th Avenue Pasco, WA 99301

File: Good Faith Asbestos Survey Ft Vancouver Bldg 404 and Bldg 987, WA‐041414

Page ii

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ III

Findings ..................................................................................................................................................... v

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Regulatory Requirements

1.2 Property & Building Description

2.0 LEAD‐BASED PAINT SURVEY (2011)

2.1 Building 987

2.2 Building 404

3.0 GOOD FAITH ASBESTOS SURVEYS (2011 & 2014)

3.1 2011 Asbestos Surveys

3.2 2014 Supplemental Asbestos Survey

3.3 Sampling Method

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS

5.0 ACM QUANTIFICATION

6.0 CONCLUSIONS

6.1 Standard Limitations

7.0 REFERENCES

List of Appendices:

Project Figures

Figure 1 – Site Vicinity Map

Figure 2 – Site Map; Building 404 & 987 Locations

Figure 3 – Building 987 Basement Interior Map

Figure 4 – Building 987 First Floor Interior Map

Figure 5 – Building 987 Second Floor Interior Map

Figure 6 – Site Photographs; Two sheets

Graph of All PLM Samples

Asbestos Sample Survey Log for 2011 & 2014 sampling events

Laboratory Samples

Bulk Asbestos PLM Analysis including Chains of Custody

AHERA Certifications

Page iii

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

White Shield Environmental, Inc. (White Shield) was retained by the National Park Service (NPS) to complete a Hazardous Materials Survey at Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve in Vancouver, Washington (Subject Site). This survey was performed on Buildings 404 and 987 at the Subject Site, building descriptions are provided below. The initial survey, including asbestos and lead‐based paint sampling was completed on September 6th, 7th and 8th of 2011, and a supplemental good faith asbestos survey was completed on January 21st of 2014. Refer to the attached Appendices for the Project Figures;

Graph of all samples collected; laboratory analysis; and project personnel certifications. This survey is being conducted prior to renovation activities at the Subject Site.

This report focuses on the good faith asbestos surveys. The summary of findings and recommendations for the lead‐based paint survey is provided in Section 2 of this report.

These surveys were conducted in general accordance with United States Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61, subpart M requirements. The survey was conducted by properly trained and licensed environmental professionals in compliance with Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSCA) Title II Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), EPA Certificate

1085, and requiring annual re‐certification.

In 2011, Roxanne Bradshaw, Faith Preston and Raymond Miller of White Shield performed a good faith asbestos survey and Lead inspection Building 404 and Building 987 at the Subject Site. The details of the

Lead inspection are not detailed within this survey. In 2014, asbestos building inspector Kaitlyn

Allegretti and asbestos abatement planner Janielle Linder completed a supplemental asbestos survey and site reconnaissance at the Subject Site. Both surveys were conducted to determine the presence/absence of asbestos containing building material (ACM) through the sampling and analysis of suspect ACM and quantify the total ACM identified within building’s 404 and 987.

Building 404 was located on the south side of East 5th Street, as a rectangular four bay, two‐story garage with a brick exterior, metal windows and composition/mastic roofing. White Shield technicians observed Building 987, located on the north side of McClellan Road and east of Fort Vancouver Way, as a horse shoe shaped building, four floors (including the basement and attic), with a concrete foundation, wood siding, composition roofing with mastic around penetrations and wood‐framed windows with putty, and is reportedly 33,000 square feet in size. Note that each of the floors was separated into wings: west side: wing 1, central: wing 2 and east side: wing 3.

In 2011, White Shield set out to survey all areas of Building 404 and Building 987, and collected one hundred and seven (107) samples, eleven (11) from building 40 and ninny six (96) from building 987. No

ACM was identified from the eleven (11) samples collected at Building 404. Five (5) of the 96 samples were identified ACM. Three thermal system insulation (TSI) samples collected in Wing 3 of the

Basement; Samples 5, 7 and 9, were reported containing Chrysotile asbestos ranging from 10% to 90%.

Page iv

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

In addition, ACM was identified (10% Chrysotile asbestos) in sample 13 collected in Wing 3 of the First

Floor. Exterior Sample 1 was collected from the mastic on the roof surrounding the penetrations, and is reported containing 10% Chrysotile asbestos. The composite roofing material was reported none detected for asbestos. During the 2011 Asbestos Survey, White Shield encountered limitations to accesses all areas of Building 987. The one 107 bulk samples were collected in new laboratory provided sample containers and shipped under standard industry Chain of Custody protocols to Triangle

Environmental Service Center, Inc. of Midlothian, Virginia an NVLAP1 accredited laboratory. All samples were analyzed utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), in accordance with EPA Test Method 600/M4‐

82‐020. The complete analytical results are provided in the Laboratory Samples appendix, and the photographs of the positive asbestos samples (excluding the Exterior mastic sample surrounding the roof penetrations) are included in Project Figures appendix of this survey.

In 2014, as set forth in the scope of work for Task Order P14PD00192, GSA Contract No. GS‐10F357U;

White Shied technicians assessed the rooms that were not accessible during the September 2011

Asbestos survey. These rooms included rooms 51, 52 and 61 in Basement Wing 2; rooms 162 and 155 on Wing 1 room 169 on Wing 2, and room 109A on Wing 3 of Level 1; rooms 209 and 212 of Wing 3 on

Level 2. Three suspect ACM samples were collected, Samples B987‐W2‐R51‐S1, B987‐W2‐R52‐S2 and

B987‐W2‐R61‐S3. Samples B987‐W2‐R52‐S2 and B987‐W2‐R61‐S3 were reported containing asbestos at

10% in Layer 1 of each sample.

During the 2014 site reconnaissance and ACM quantification, three additional suspect ACM materials were observed that were not reported in the 2011 survey. These additional areas include: Room 53, Wing 1 basement; room 159, Wing 1, Level 1; and Room 205, Wing 2, Level 2. These additional samples are identified as B987‐W1‐R159‐S4, B987‐W1‐R53‐S5 and B987‐W2‐R205‐S6. Sample B987‐W2‐R205‐S6 was reported containing asbestos in layer 3 at 15% and layer 4 at 4%. Labroatory analytical reports are provided in Attachment C. Sample locations are presented in Figure 2, Sample Location Map, provided in

Attachment A.

The six (6) bulk samples were collected in new laboratory provided sample containers and shipped under standard industry Chain of Custody protocols to EMC Laboratories of Phoenix, Arizona an NVLAP accredited laboratory. All samples were analyzed utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), in accordance with EPA Test Method 600/M4‐82‐020. The complete analytical results are provided in the

Laboratory Samples appendix, and the photographs of the positive asbestos samples and the location of the samples are included in Project Figures appendix of this survey.

1 The National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) provides third-party accreditation to testing and calibration laboratories in response to legislative actions or requests from government agencies or private-sector organizations.

Page v

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

In addition, White Shied technicians in 2014 identified the locations, types and quantities by square or linear feet, per industry standards, of existing ACM (White Shield, Inc survey, 2011) throughout the

Subject Site. The estimated quantities are reported within this survey report.

Findings

According to EPA Standards, any material that contains 1.0 percent (1.0%) or more of asbestos is considered an ACM. If disturbed, ACM must be handled, removed, and disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal laws.

Laboratory analysis reports five of the one hundred and seven samples collected during the 2011

Asbestos Survey positive for asbestos exceeding 1%. All five samples were collected from Building 987.

Basement Wing 3 Samples 5, 7 and 9 Thermal system insulation (TSI), First Floor Wing 3 Sample 13

Mastic and Tile, and Exterior Roof Mastic Sample 1 are each reported containing Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%. None of the samples collected from Building 404 reported with asbestos.

Laboratory analysis for samples collected during the 2014 sampling reported three of the six samples collected containing Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%. Samples W2‐R52‐S2 TSI, W2‐R561‐S3 (TSI), and W2‐R205‐S6 (layer 3, green/tan floor tile, and layer 4, yellow mastic) are each reported containing

Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%. Please refer to the laboratory samples report provided in the appendix of this survey.

The 2014 White Shield site reconnaissance also included identifying the quantities by square feet (SF) or linear feet (LF) of existing ACM throughout Building 987. Known ACM included vinyl composition tile

(VCT), mastics, and pipe TSI. The exterior roof Sample 1 was not accessible during the site reconnaissance. The 2011 Whiteshield Survey reports that the mastic was sampled surrounding the penetrations, and the composite roofing material was reported none detected for asbestos. If additional mastics are observed, additional sampling is recommended.

The following are the known quantities of ACM identified during, both during the 2011 survey and the

2014 survey:

ACM mastic and associated VCT:

o Level 1: 10,100 SF; with 4,855 SF underneath carpet o Level 2: 9,800 SF; with 5,180 underneath carpet

ACM VCT (red and green) underneath surface non ACM VCT; Level 2, Wing 2, Room 205:

o 190 SF

ACM Pipe TSI throughout building:

o 1,050 LF (exposed in basement). An additional 1,500 LF of TSI is assumed behind walls/ ceilings. As noted by the National Parks Service (NPS), historical walls are not torn into

Page vi

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014 to abate TSI. NPS has stated that TSI will only be removed on exposed pipe or if hidden pipe is disturbed, which should be very limited on this project.

ACM Mastic; Exterior roof mastic, surrounding the penetrations o 300 SF

As required by Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296‐56 and Southwest Clean Air Agency

(SWCAA) 476 (Standards for Asbestos Control) and 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M (Federal Asbestos

Requirements), any demolition, renovation or repair of ACM must be completed by properly licensed/certified asbestos abatement personnel.

Notification of asbestos containing building materials is required by the Department of Labor &

Industries to both building maintenance staff and tenants. Notification is typically provided through an

Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

1.0 INTRODUCTION

White Shield completed a Good Faith Asbestos Survey and Supplemental Good Faith Asbestos Survey at

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve in Vancouver, Washington (Subject Site). The initial survey was conducted on September 6th, 7th and 8th, at Building 404 and Building 987 at the Subject Site. The supplemental survey was conducted on January 21st, 2014, at Building987 the Subject Site. These surveys were conducted to identify asbestos containing materials (ACM), prior to renovation or demolition activities for Building 404 and Building 987 at the Subject Site.

1.1 Regulatory Requirements

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Code of Federal Regulations 40CFR Part 61, subpart M requires for a supplemental survey by a Certified Asbestos Building Inspector. The Federal government has developed several laws and regulations designed to govern the use of asbestos and better protect the public. In 1986, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) was signed into law as Title II of the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) of 1976. According to EPA Standards, any material that contains 1.0 percent (1.0%) or more of asbestos is considered ACM or Asbestos Containing

Building Material (ACBM) and, if disturbed, must be handled in accordance with local, state and federal laws.

The survey was conducted by a properly trained and licensed environmental professional in compliance with TSCA Title II AHERA, EPA Certificate 1085, requires annual re‐certification. Clark County requires that a copy of the written asbestos survey be available on site for inspection during renovation, construction, and/or demolition work. It is the responsibility of the owner and/or contractor to make this survey document available to all concerned parties who may be handling the ACM.

The purpose of an AHERA asbestos survey is to locate, identify, sample, and analyze suspect ACM that may be disturbed by demolition on a building or structure. The survey is required to be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 763.86. These federal standards require surveys to be conducted by an AHERA

Accredited Building Inspector with analysis to be provided by an asbestos laboratory certified by the

National Bureau of Standards. All survey work was conducted in compliance with the above‐mentioned standard.

Suspect ACM are identified by types of material such as the following:

Surfacing Material ‐ means material that is sprayed‐on, troweled‐on, or otherwise applied to the surfaces including, but not limited to, surfacing material, thermal system insulation, roofing material, fire barriers, gaskets, flooring materials, and cement siding.

Thermal System Insulation ‐ means material applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, tanks, ducts, or other structural components to prevent heat loss or gain.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

Miscellaneous Material ‐ building materials on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, concrete pipe (transite), glazing putty, wallboard, various mastics, and does not include surfacing material or thermal system insulation.

1.2 Property & Building Description

The buildings of the Subject Site are listed by the Clark County Assessor under parcel number 38279906.

White Shield observed Building 404 as a rectangular two‐story garage with four bays, brick exterior, with metal windows and a composition with mastic roof. Building 987 was observed as a horseshoe‐shaped four‐level structure (including a basement and attic), with a concrete foundation and approximately

33,000 square‐feet (sq/ft) in size. White Shield was not granted access to attic due to restrictions from military. According to Fort Vancouver maintenance mechanic, Bryan Playle, Building 987 was constructed in the early 1900’s.

2.0 LEAD‐BASED PAINT SURVEY (2011)

The following is the summary of findings and recommendations for the lead‐based paint (LBP) survey completed at the Subject site by White Shield in 2011.

2.1 Building 987

Total samples for Building 987: X‐Ray Florescence (XRF)‐1323, Soil‐1 composite from drain drip lines (6 areas), Dust wipes‐1 composite random (6 areas):

Calibrations: 9/6/2011‐30 calibration readings, 9/8/2011‐ 11 calibration readings, 9/9/2011‐ 9 calibration readings 439

Positive samples: 9/6/2011 ‐50 positives for LBP, 9/8/2011‐79 positives for LBP, 9/9/2011‐310 positives of LBP.

Exterior Soil: 2680ppm, well over local guidelines of 250 ppm.

Interior Composite Wipe Sample: 576.8 ug/sqft. The local guidelines are set at 250 ug/sqft. The samples were taken from 6 window sills, selected randomly, 2 from each floor.

The interior condition: ranges from intact to failing LBP. Full extent of Lead dust contamination is unknown. Interior window sills are contaminated with lead dust per random dust wipe sampling, the reading above the local regulatory level of 250 ug/sqft. Further extensive dust wipe sampling would be required to identify. At this point the entire interior of the building is considered contaminated. White

Shield recommends that all failing paint be stabilized prior to clean up activities for Lead dust contamination to ensure safe environment for workers and public.

The exterior condition: Building 987 has a large amount of paint chips on the ground, due to bad repair of the exterior of the building. White Shield recommends exterior clean up and stabilization of damaged areas.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

The soil requires proper clean up to ensure a safe environment for the public and workers.

Given the age of the building and average reading results, all the following components are presumed to be positive:

Exterior: All components are presumed positive for LBP, except new additions to the porch on

Wing 3 which are depicted in the White Shield report.

Interior: All perimeter walls (plaster), any interior plaster walls, ceilings, window assemblies, pillars/columns, rock walls, vents, chimney wraps, stairwells, cove base trim of exterior walls, are to be considered Lead Based Paint. Although the window assemblies were restored in the

1990's, all window assemblies must be presumed to be positive for LBP.

2.2 Building 404

A total of 232 readings, (including Calibrations) were taken from Building 404: 6 readings were found to contain LBP.

214 readings were of painted surfaces, 18 samples were Calibration readings.

The exterior of building was clean of paint chips except a few around the yellow columns outside the bay doors

White Shield suggests having the yellow and black columns and orange L bracket stabilized and all visible paint chips properly cleaned up.

3.0 GOOD FAITH ASBESTOS SURVEYS (2011 & 2014)

Two Good Faith Asbestos Surveys were performed by a properly trained, qualified and certified environmental professional using the applicable portions of the currently recognized standard protocol, as developed for supplemental asbestos investigations as promulgated in 40 CFR Part 763 and as amended in the Federal Register.

3.1 2011 Asbestos Surveys

Areas of Building 404 surveyed during the 2011 survey included the exterior, the bays and the following rooms: Dispatch Room, Battery Room, 2 Storage Areas (fence walls), Janitor Closet, Men’s and Women’s

Restroom and Lube Room (access only from exterior of building). Suspect ACM samples from Building

404 were collected from the following areas and include:

Exterior: Brick, metal windows and composition with mastic roofing.

Office and Dispatch: Wood doors, 1’ x 1’ floor tile, ceiling tiles with mastic dots, pink insulation, cove base and plaster walls.

Battery Room: Brick walls, metal door and chemical wash station.

Storage Areas: Located in back corners; brick walls and fence interior walls.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

Janitor Closet: Brick walls and porcelain drain.

Men’s and Women’s Restroom: Brick walls, 1” x 1” blue tile on floor and trim on walls.

Lube Room: Brick walls and pipes.

Bays: Brick walls, large insulation board and ducting.

Areas of Building 987 surveyed during the 2011 survey included the exterior and interior of 4 floors

(includes basement and attic). No access to attic was granted due to restrictions from military. White

Shield separated each floor into wings (west side: wing 1, central: wing 2 and east side: wing 3). Suspect

ACM samples from Building 404 were collected from the following areas and include:

Basement:

o Wing 1: Includes a mail room, women’s restroom, men’s locker room with showers, and furnace room with 3 adjoining storage rooms.

Floors: 1’ x 1’ floor tile and concrete foundation throughout.

Walls: Brick and rock mostly on exterior walls, sheet rock and plaster and 1’ x 1’ acoustic tile.

Ceilings: Standard acoustic tile, sheetrock/plaster and open ceilings with wood structural beams.

Misc. Materials: Formica on counters in mail room and restrooms. Piping exposed on ceiling throughout basement (some marked as asbestos containing wrap and some marked without.) Piping in furnace room not marked and the same materials found in furnace room in wing 3.

o Wing 2: Includes 2 locked rooms we were not allowed accesses to. 1 room we were allowed limited access to and a room labeled the “cubby hole” that had cabinets with a sink and an adjoining storage room. Also stairways that led to the first floor on both the west and east sides.

Floors: Concrete foundation throughout.

Walls: Brick and rock mostly on exterior walls, sheet rock and plaster.

Ceilings: Sheetrock/plaster, and open ceilings with wood.

Misc. Materials: Piping exposed on ceiling throughout basement (some marked as asbestos containing wrap and some marked without.) Vinyl stair tread, pergo and 1’ x 1’ tile on stairs.

o Wing 3: Includes furnace room, large conference room, 3 offices, telecom room, storage room and stairwell leading to 1st floor.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

Floors: Concrete foundation throughout, 1’ x 1’ floor tile and carpet found.

Walls: Brick and rock mostly on exterior walls, bare wood, sheet rock and plaster and 1’ x 1’ acoustic tile.

Ceilings: Standard acoustic tile, 1’ x 1’ acoustic tile, sheetrock/plaster and open ceilings with wood.

Misc. Materials: Piping exposed on ceiling throughout basement (some marked as asbestos containing wrap and some marked without.) Piping in furnace room not marked and the same materials found in furnace room in wing 1.

First Floor:

o Wing 1: Includes 8 offices, a copy room, large connecting hallway and large conference room.

Floors: Carpet and 1’ x 1’ floor tile.

Walls: Sheet rock and plaster and 1’ x 1’ acoustic tile.

Ceilings: Standard acoustic tile, sheetrock/plaster and molded tin on ceiling.

Misc. Materials: Formica on counters in mail room and restrooms and cove base.

o Wing 2: Includes 10 offices and 2 stairwells that lead down to basement and up to 2nd floor.

Floors: 1’ x 1’ floor tile and carpet.

Walls: Sheet rock and plaster.

Ceilings: Sheetrock/plaster, and tin ceilings.

Misc. Materials: Vinyl tread on stairways and cove base.

o Wing 3: Includes 12 offices connected by a large hallway and a large area split into several spaces with partition walls.

Floors: 1’ x 1’ floor tile throughout (small patch of blue).

Walls: Sheet rock, plaster, small patches of wallpaper, plywood and wood paneling.

Ceilings: Molded tin ceiling and sheetrock/plaster.

Misc. Materials: Metal covering the brick chimney and cove base.

Second Floor:

o Wing 1: Includes 16 offices and a large hallway connecting all.

Floors: 1’ x 1’ floor tile throughout.

Walls: Sheet rock and plaster.

Ceilings: Sheetrock/plaster.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

Misc. Materials: Cove base.

o Wing 2: Includes 5 offices, men’s restroom and women’s locker room with shower and a break room.

Floors: 1’ x 1’ floor tile and carpet.

Walls: Sheet rock, plaster, wall paper and 1’ x 1’ acoustic tile.

Ceilings: Standard acoustic tile and sheetrock/plaster.

Misc. Materials: Formica on counters in restrooms and cove base.

o Wing 3: Includes 11offices and a large hallway connecting all.

Floors: Carpet throughout.

Walls: Sheet rock and plaster and carpet.

Ceilings: Sheetrock/plaster.

Misc. Materials: Cove base.

Exterior: Incudes Wood Siding, composition roofing with mastic around penetrations and wood windows with putty.

3.2 2014 Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Areas surveyed included all rooms that were inaccessible in 2011. Suspect ACM samples include;

thermal system insulation (TSI), acoustical wall tile, silver paint, and floor tile and mastics. The uniform materials observed within the previously inaccessible rooms were not sampled during the 2014 sampling event.

The rooms that were inaccessible in 2011 include (Room Number Location & Sample Identification):

Room 51, Basement, Wing 2; sampled TSI (W2‐R51‐S1)

Room 52, Basement, Wing 2; sampled TSI (W2‐R52‐S2)

Room 61, Basement, Wing 2; sampled TSI (W2‐R61‐S3)

Room 162, Level 1, Wing 1; observed 3” taupe cove base & carpet (uniform in Level 1, Wing 1)

Room 155, Level 1, Wing 1; observed 1’x1’ tile and 3” dark cove base

Room 169, Level 1, Wing 2; observed 1’x1’ tile (uniform in Level 1, Wing 2)

Room 109A, Level 1, Wing 3 of Level 1; observed 1’x1’ tile (uniform in Level 1, Wing 2)

Room 209, Level 2, Wing 3; observed floor tile and cove base (uniform in Level 2, Wing 3)

Room 212, Level 2, Wing 3; (uniform in Level 2, Wing 3)

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

Three additional suspect ACM samples were collected during the site reconnaissance in areas previously sampling in 2011. These areas include:

Room 159, Level 1, Wing 1; sampled acoustical wall tile (W1‐R159‐S4)

Room 53, basement, Wing 1; sampled silver paint (W1‐R53‐S5)

Room 205, Level 2, Wing 3; sampled exposed subfloor and associate layers (W2‐R205‐S6)

3.3 Sampling Method

Sample locations for each of the surveys were chosen in a non‐random fashion, with emphasis placed on obtaining samples of each type of suspect ACM using destructive methods in some cases. Samples were collected by carefully removing portions of the suspect material.

Sample containers were labeled with identification and record numbers. Sample locations and the type of material sampled were documented on a sampling data form. Areas where samples of potentially friable materials were to be extracted were moistened by spraying the immediate area with a mix of

10% alcohol and water. Samples were extracted using a clean knife, drill capsule, or cork‐boring tool, which were used to cut out or scrape off approximately one tablespoon of the material. Where possible, all layers of material were penetrated and incorporated into each specific sample. Each sample was placed in a laboratory provided container, which was then tightly sealed. The exterior of the container was wiped with a “wet‐wipe” to remove any material that may have adhered to it during sampling.

Sampling tools, if utilized, were cleaned with wet‐wipes. Used wet wipes and rags were placed in a labeled plastic waste bag for disposal. Immediately after collection, samples were placed in pre‐labeled plastic containers. Containers with samples were then placed in a large re‐sealable plastic bag for transport to the laboratory.

During the 2014 survey, a sample location diagram was completed concurrent to sampling activities, detailing the sample identifications with the sample locations. The 2011 survey included a drawing for

Building 987, with sample locations, without sample identifications, and is therefore not provided as part of this comprehensive survey. The lack of a sample location map is recognized as a data gap.

Photographs were taken to identify building construction, types of building materials and identify each sample collected. Selected photographs of all samples reported containing greater than 1% asbestos

(with the exception of the exterior roof mastic sample) are included in the Project Figures appendix of this report.

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS

In 2011, White Shield collected one hundred and seven (107) bulk samples from Building 404 and

Building 987 at the Subject Site. Each sample was assigned sample identification numbers and entered on sample summary/chain‐of‐custody forms. The samples were delivered to the laboratory under standard chain‐of‐custody protocol. All of the analysis for the 2011 survey was performed at Triangle

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

Environmental Service Center, Inc. (a NVLAP accreditation lab) in Triangle Environmental Service Center, Inc. of Midlothian, Virginia.

During the supplemental survey conducted in 2014, White Shield collected six (6) bulk samples from

Building 987 at the Subject Site. Each sample was assigned sample identification numbers and entered on sample summary/chain‐of‐custody forms. The samples were delivered to the laboratory under standard chain‐of‐custody protocol. All analysis for the 2014 supplemental survey was performed at

EMC Laboratory, Inc. (NVLAP Accreditation #1926) in Phoenix, Arizona.

All samples collected during the 2011 and 2014 surveys were analyzed utilizing EPA Test Method

600/M4‐82‐020. This method employs polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining for identification of mineral forms of asbestos. Testing was conducted by trained asbestos microscopists with active participation in the EPA bulk analysis quality control program. Results are reported by type of asbestos, percent of fibrous asbestos and non‐asbestos materials present. The non‐fibrous material is not identified in the PLM Method. The quantification of asbestos in the sample is intended to be an estimate only and the limit of detection for this method is approximately 1% by volume.

The US EPA defines ACM as “Any material containing at least one percent (1%) asbestos, as determined by polarized light microscopy”. The laboratory will break down the individual sample results into separate layers if needed (an example would be floor tile and the mastic used to hold it down).

Laboratory analysis from the 2011 survey reports that 5 of the 107 samples collected are positive for asbestos. Basement samples W3‐S5 (TSI), W3‐S7 (TSI), and W3‐S9 (TSI), first floor sample S3‐S13

(mastic) and the Exterior‐1 (mastic surrounding the roof penetrations), are each reported containing

Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%. Please refer to the laboratory samples report in the appendix of this survey.

Laboratory analysis from the 2014 supplemental survey reports that 3 of the 6 samples collected are positive for asbestos. Samples W2‐R52‐S2 (TSI), W2‐R561‐S3 (TSI), and W2‐R205‐S6 (layer 3, green/tan floor tile, and layer 4, yellow mastic) are each reported containing Chrysotile asbestos greater than at

1%. Please refer to the laboratory samples report in the appendix of this survey.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

Positive for Asbestos Fibers (PLM Method)

Date

Collected Sample ID Location Material

Percent Asbestos

Sample Photograph

9/8/11 W3‐S13 First floor; Wing 3 Black mastic & associated tile

10%

9/8/11 W3‐S5 Basement; Wing 3 TSI 10%

9/8/11 W3‐S7 Basement; Wing 3 TSI 90%

9/8/11 W3‐S9 Basement; Wing 3 TSI 80%

9/8/11 Exterior‐1 Exterior; Roof, surrounding roof penetrations

Surfacing Mastic 10% <No photograph>

1/21/14 W2‐R52‐S2 Room 52, Basement, Wing 2

TSI 10%

1/21/14 W2‐R61‐S3 Room 61, Basement, Wing 2

TSI 5%

1/21/14 W2‐R205‐ S6

Room 205, Level 2, Wing 2

L3 – Green/ Tan floor tile

L4 – Mastic (yellow)

15% 4%

Note: Chrysotile asbestos was the only type of asbestos identified. L=Layer, Quantity* ‐ All quantities are estimated and should be verified by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

5.0 ACM QUANTIFICATION

The 2014 supplemental survey and site reconnaissance included identifying the quantities by square feet (SF) or linear feet (LF) of existing ACM throughout the building. Known ACM included mastics

(black) and associated vinyl composition tile (VCT), and pipe thermal system insulation (TSI).

The following are the known quantities of ACM identified during the 2011 and 2014 ACM Surveys:

ACM mastic and associated VCT:

o Level 1: 10,100 SF; with 4,855 SF underneath carpet o Level 2: 9,800 SF; with 5,180 underneath carpet

ACM VCT (Red/ green) underneath non ACM VCT; Level 2, Wing 2, Room 205:

o 190 SF

ACM Pipe TSI throughout building:

o 1,050 LF (exposed in basement). An additional 1,500 LF of TSI is assumed behind walls/ ceilings. As noted by the National Parks Service (NPS), historical walls are not torn into to abate TSI. NPS has stated that TSI will only be removed on exposed pipe or if hidden pipe is disturbed, which should be very limited on this project.

ACM Roof Mastic (Surrounding the penetrations) o 300 SF

6.0 CONCLUSIONS

X‐Ray Florescence (XRF), soil composite sampling and dust wipe sampling analysis confirm lead‐based paints were identified at both Building 404 and Building 987, exterior and interior. Additional details regarding the Lead‐Based Paint Survey is available within the 2011 White Shield Survey.

Laboratory analysis reports five of the one hundred and seven samples collected (in 2011) are reported positive for asbestos. All five samples were collected from Building 987. Basement Wing 3 Samples 5, 7 and 9 Thermal system insulation (TSI), First Floor Wing 3 Sample 13 Mastic and Tile, and Exterior‐1

(mastic surrounding penetrations) are each reported containing Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%.

None of the samples collected from Building 404 reported with asbestos. Samples collected during the

2014 sampling event identified that three of the six samples collected are reported containing Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%. Samples W2‐R52‐S2 TSI, W2‐R561‐S3 (TSI), and W2‐R205‐S6 (layer 3, green/tan floor tile, and layer 4, yellow mastic) are each reported containing Chrysotile asbestos greater than at 1%. Please refer to the laboratory samples report provided in the appendix of this survey.

ACM quantification identified 10,100 SF (4,855 SF underneath carpet) of ACM Mastic and associated VCT on Level 1, 9,800 SF (5,180 underneath carpet) on Level 2, 190 SF of ACM VCT and mastic underneath non ACM VCT, 1,050 LF of exposed TSI, (1,500 assumed behind walls/ ceilings, slated to remain in place unless disturbed) throughout the building, and approximately 300 SF of mastic was identified on the

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014 roof, surrounding the penetrations, with the tar‐like composition roofing material reported as none detected for asbestos.

As required by Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296‐56 and Southwest Clean Air Agency

(SWCAA) 476 (Standards for Asbestos Control) and 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M (Federal Asbestos

Requirements), any demolition, renovation or repair of ACM must be completed by properly licensed/certified asbestos abatement personnel.

Notification of asbestos containing building materials is required by the Department of Labor &

Industries to both building maintenance staff and tenants. Notification is typically provided through an

Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Plan.

6.1 Standard Limitations

Hazardous material surveys are non‐comprehensive by nature and subject to many limitations including those presented below. Our assessment has considered risks pertaining to asbestos; however, this survey is limited to only those locations sampled. This survey was not designed to identify all potential concerns or eliminate all risk.

The site visit consisted of a thorough visual walk‐through of the site for the purpose of viewing, mapping and sampling suspect asbestos‐containing building materials. White Shield is not responsible for identifying materials that require destructive means to access, materials that are hidden from sight or in enclosed areas (e.g.: hidden between walls), or materials that cannot be found with reasonable diligence. No questionable areas were identified during the investigation. The SWCAA requires that asbestos‐containing materials be removed by a certified contractor prior to demolition or major renovation project.

White Shield performed this survey in accordance with the generally accepted standards of care that exist in the industrial hygiene profession in State of Washington at the time of this study. The asbestos survey was performed as a pre‐renovation or demolition measure for identification of asbestos containing materials. This survey is not intended for use as plans and specifications for abatement.

Actual abatement costs can be determined by acquiring contractor bids.

Thank you for allowing White Shield the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have questions regarding this report or require further discussion of any portion of this project we will be pleased to offer our assistance.

7.0 REFERENCES

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants, 40

CFR 61 Subpart M.

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve Vancouver, Washington 98661

April 14, 2014

EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 40 CFR 763. EPA /600/R‐93/116: Bulk PLM

400 Point Count, /1000 Point Count, Asbestos Test Method

Fort Vancouver Good Faith Asbestos and Lead Inspection; White Shield, Inc, October 21, 2011

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Construction Industry Standard (1994), 29 CFR 1926.1101

Occupational Safety & Health Administration, May 4, 1993, Lead Exposure in Construction; Interim

Final Rule, 29 CFR Part 1926.62

Southwest Clean Air Agency; Guidance for Demolition or Renovation of Structure(s) or Area(s)

Project Figures

Figure No.:

Sheet 01 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

N

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

ECI-001

0506-01

Site Vicinity Map Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Vancouver, WA 98661

Subject Property Fort Vancouver

Vancouver, WA 98661

Sheet 02 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

N

Site Map Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Vancouver, WA 98661

McClellan Rd

E 5th Street

Fo rt

Van co uve r W ay

Building 987

Building 404

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

ECI-001

0506-01

Sheet 03 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

Basement Interior Sketch Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Barracks Bldg 987 Vancouver, WA 98661

Explication

Carpet on Tile on Mastic

Tile on Mastic

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

ECI-001

0506-01

<Wing 2> <Wing 3><Wing 1>

ACM Sample <1% Asbestos

ACM Sample >1% Asbestos

Room 52 Room 51

Room 1

Room 1B

Room 1A

Room 61

Room 53

W2-R51-S1

W1-R53-S5

W2-R61-S3

W3-S5

W3-S7

W3-S9

W2-R52-S2

Sheet 04 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

First Floor Interior Sketch Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Barracks Bldg 987 Vancouver, WA 98661

Explication

Carpet on Tile on Mastic (black)

Tile and Mastic (black)

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

ECI-001

0506-01

<Wing 2> <Wing 3><Wing 1>

ACM Sample <1% Asbestos

ACM Sample >1% Asbestos

W1-R159-S4

Room 159

Room 155

Room 169

Room 109A

R o o m

W3-S13

Sheet 05 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

Second Floor Interior Sketch Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Barracks Bldg 987 Vancouver, WA 98661

Explication

Carpet on Tile on Mastic

Tile on Mastic

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

ECI-001

0506-01

<Wing 2> <Wing 3><Wing 1>

ACM Sample <1% Asbestos

ACM Sample >1% Asbestos

Room 205

W2-R205-S6

Room 209 Room 212

Sheet 06 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

Site Photographs Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Barracks Bldg 987 Vancouver, WA 98661

Photograph 1 - Subject Property; viewing north. Photograph 2 - Sample B987-W2-R52-S2; basement room 52.

TSI 10% asbestos

Photograph 3 -Sample B987-W2-R61-S3; basement room 61.

TSI 10% asbestos

Photograph 5 - Floor 1: Wing 3 Sample 13 ~10% Chrysotile in the black mastic only. The 1’x1’ tile associated with the mastic is considered asbestos due to the mastic used to adhere it to the floor.

Photograph 6 - Basement: Wing 3 Sample 5 ~ 10% Chrysotile; TSI.

Photograph 4 - Sample B987-W2-R205-S6; Level 2, room 205.

Subfloor vinyl composite tile (green & tan) 15% asbestos; mastic (yellow) 4% asbestos.

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

Sheet 07 of 07

Date:

Completed By:

Reviewed By.:

Version:

Project No.:

environmental services www.ecocononline.com

Site Photographs Supplemental Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver Barracks Bldg 987 Vancouver, WA 98661

Photograph 7 - Basement: Wing 3 Sample 7 ~ 90% Chrysotile; TSI. Photograph 8 - Basement: Wing 3 Sample 9 ~ 80% Chrysotile; TSI.

March 3, 2014

K. Allegretti

S. Spencer

Graph of all PLM Samples

Good Faith Asbestos Survey

Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve, Vancouver, Washington

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; Basement: Wing 1

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

No 1/21/2014

No 9/8/2011

B987‐W1‐R53‐S5 Silver paint Basement: Room 53‐ East wall Surfacing Yes Good

W‐1 S‐9 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Basement: Hall B‐Wall B Joint compound Yes Good

9/8/2011

W‐1 S‐8 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Basement: Hall B‐Wall B Surfacing Yes Good No 9/8/2011

No 9/8/2011

W‐1 S‐7 Plaster Basement: Under Stairs Surfacing Yes Good No

No 9/8/2011

W‐1 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Basement: Room 53‐Wall B Joint compound Yes Good

W‐1 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Basement: Room 53‐Wall B Surfacing Yes Good

9/8/2011

W‐1 S‐4 Formica Basement: Mail Room Counter misc No Good No 9/8/2011

No 9/8/2011

W‐1 S‐3 Formica Basement: Latrine‐Wall B misc No Good No

No 9/8/2011

W‐1 S‐2 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Basement: Shower‐Wall E Joint compound Yes Good

W‐1 S‐1 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Basement: Shower‐Wall E Surfacing Yes Good

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; Basement: Wing 2

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

TSI = Thermal System

Insulation

1/21/2014

B987‐W2‐R61‐S3 Pipe wrap Basement: Room 61 Ceiling TSI YES Good Yes: 10% 1/21/2014

No 1/21/2014

B987‐W2‐R52‐S2 Pipe wrap Basement: Room 52 Ceiling TSI YES Good Yes: 10%

No 9/8/2011

B987‐W2‐R51‐S1 Pipe wrap Basement: Room 51 Ceiling TSI YES Good

W‐2 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Basement: Room 3‐Wall D2 Surfacing Yes Good

9/8/2011

W‐2 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Basement: Room 3‐Wall B2 Surfacing Yes Good No 9/8/2011

No 9/8/2011

W‐2 S‐4 Pergo flooring Basement: Stairs A Misc No Good No

No 9/8/2011

W‐2 S‐3 Formica Basement: Room 3‐Wall B2 Misc No Good

W‐2 S‐2 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Basement: Room 3‐Wall D2 Joint compound Yes Good

W‐2 S‐1 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Basement: Room 3‐Wall B2 Surfacing Yes Good No 9/8/2011

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; Basement: Wing 3

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

TSI = Thermal System

Insulation

No 9/8/2011W‐3 S‐11 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Basement: Room 8‐Wall D2 Joint compound Yes Good

9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐10 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Basement: Room 8‐Wall D2 Surfacing Yes Good No 9/8/2011

No 9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐9 Pipe Wrap Basement: Room 1‐Ceiling TSI Yes Good Yes‐80%

Yes‐90% 9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐8 White Patching Material Basement: Room 1‐Ceiling TSI Yes Good

W‐3 S‐7 Pipe Wrap‐Heavy Canvas Basement: Room 1‐Furnace TSI Yes Good

9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐6 White Tape on Pipe Basement: Room 1‐Ceiling TSI YES Good No 9/8/2011

No 9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐5 Pipe Wrap with Silver Paint Basement: Room 1‐Ceiling TSI Yes Good Yes‐10%

No 9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐4 1 x 1 Brown Floor Tile Basement: Room 2‐Floor Misc. No Good

W‐3 S‐3 Cement Board Basement: Room 2‐Wall C Misc. Yes Good

9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐2 1 x1 Acustic Tile Basement: Room 2‐Ceiling Misc. Yes Good No 9/8/2011

W‐3 S‐1 Mastic Dots Basement: Room 2‐Ceiling Misc. No Good No

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; First Floor: Wing 1

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

1/21/2014

No 9/7/2011

B987‐W1‐R159‐S4 Acoustal tile (beige/ off white) and mastic

First Floor: Room 159; south wall Misc Yes Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐1 S‐9 Stair Tread First Floor: Stairwell B Misc No Good

W‐1 S‐8 Joint Compound First Floor: Room 101‐Ceiling Joint compound Yes Good

9/7/2011

W‐1 S‐7 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound First Floor: Hall Joint compound Yes Good No 9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐1 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor: Hall Surfacing Yes Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐1 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound First Floor: Room 101‐Wall D Joint compound Yes Good

W‐1 S‐4 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor: Room 101‐Wall D Surfacing Yes Good

9/7/2011

W‐1 S‐3 Cove Base First Floor: Room 101‐Wall D Misc No Good No 9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐1 S‐2 Plaster First Floor: Room 101‐Wall B Surfacing Yes Good No

W‐1 S‐1 Plaster First Floor: Room 101‐Wall B Surfacing Yes Good

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; First Floor: Wing 2

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐2 S‐7 Plaster First Floor: Office 7 Wall B Surfacing Yes Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐2 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound First Floor: Office 6 Wall C Joint compound Yes Good

W‐2 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor: Office 6 Wall C Surfacing Yes Good

9/7/2011

W‐2 S‐4 Plaster First Floor: Office 3‐Wall A Surfacing No Good No 9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐2 S‐3 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor: Office 4‐Wall D Surfacing No Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐2 S‐2 Plaster First Floor: Office 5‐Wall D Surfacing Yes Good

W‐2 S‐1 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor: Office 4‐Wall D Surfacing Yes Good

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; First Floor: Wing 3

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐13 1 x 1 Floor Tile First Floor: Floor Misc No Good Yes‐10% 9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐12 Wall Paper First Floor Misc No Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐11 Blue 1 x 1 Floor Tile First Floor Misc No Good

W‐3 S‐10 Wall Paper First Floor Misc No Good

9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐9 Wall Paper First Floor Misc No Good No 9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐8 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound First Floor Joint compound Yes Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐7 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound First Floor Joint compound Yes Good

W‐3 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor Surfacing Yes Good

9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound First Floor Joint compound Yes Good No 9/7/2011

No 9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐4 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor Surfacing Yes Good No

No 9/7/2011

W‐3 S‐3 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing First Floor Surfacing Yes Good

W‐3 S‐2 Plaster First Floor Surfacing Yes Good

W‐3 S‐1 Plaster First Floor Surfacing Yes Good No 9/7/2011

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; Second Floor: Wing 1

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐12 Cove Base Second Floor: Room 259 Wall

A Misc No Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐11 Plaster Second Floor: Hall B Wall D Surfacing Yes Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐10 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Second Floor: Hall B Wall C Joint compound Yes Good

W‐1 S‐9 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Hall B Wall C Surfacing Yes Good

9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐8 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Second Floor: Room 272 Wall

A Joint compound Yes Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐7 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Room 272 Wall

A Surfacing Yes Good No

Yes‐<1% 9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Second Floor: Room 267 Wall

D Joint compound Yes Good

W‐1 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Room 267 Wall

D Surfacing Yes Good

9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐4 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Room 273 Wall

D Surfacing Yes Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐3 Wall Paper Second Floor: Room 273 Wall

D Misc No Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐1 S‐2 1 x 1 Floor Tile Second Floor: Room 270 Floor Misc No Fair

W‐1 S‐1 Plaster Second Floor: Room 270 Wall

C Surfacing Yes Good

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; Second Floor: Wing 2

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

*L = Layer

1/21/2014

B987‐W2‐R205‐S6 (L 3&4)* Floor tile (Red/ green); Mastic Second Floor: Room 205;

southeast corner Misc No Fair

Yes: 15%

Yes: 4% 1/21/2014

No 9/6/2011

B987‐W2‐R205‐S6 (L 1, 2 &

5)*

Vinyl tile (beige/gray); Mastic;

Leveling cmpound

Second Floor: Room 205;

southeast corner Misc No Fair No

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐15 Plaster Second Floor: C430Womans

Bath‐Wall B Surfacing Yes Good

W‐2 S‐14 Plaster Second Floor: Room 254‐Wall

B Surfacing Yes Good

9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐13 Plaster Second Floor: Break Room‐

Wall A Surfacing Yes Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐12 Vinyl Tile Second Floor: Break Room‐

Wall F Misc No Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐11 Wall Paper Second Floor: Break Room‐

Wall A Misc No Good

W‐2 S‐10 Formica Second Floor: Break Room‐

Sink Misc No Good

9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐9 Formica Second Floor: Mens Bath‐Sink Misc No Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐8 Sheet Vinyl Second Floor: Womans Bath‐

Wall D Misc Yes Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐7 Cove Base Second Floor: Womans Bath‐

Wall D Misc No Good

W‐2 S‐6 Sheet Rock‐Joint Compound Second Floor: Room 252‐Wall

A Misc Yes Good

9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐5 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Room 252‐

Ceiling Surfacing Yes Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐4 Acoustic Tile Second Floor: Room 204‐

Ceiling Misc Yes Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐2 S‐3 Acoustic Tile Second Floor: Room 203‐Wall

D Misc Yes Good

W‐2 S‐2 Wall Paper Second Floor: Room 254‐Wall

D Misc No Good

W‐2 S‐1 Cove Base Brown Second Floor: Room 202‐Wall

B Misc No Good No 9/6/2011

Buildings 987 and 404

Building 987; Second Floor: Wing 3

Sample # Materials & Description Location Type Friable Condition Asbestos Date

No 9/6/2011W‐3 S‐15 Cove Base Second Floor: Stair Well Misc No Good

9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐14 Plaster Second Floor: Room 209‐Wall

C Surfacing Yes Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐13 Sheet Rock‐Joint Second Floor: Room 214‐Wall

C Joint compound Yes Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐12 Sheet Rock‐Joint Second Floor: Room 208‐Wall

A Joint compound Yes Good

W‐3 S‐11 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Room 208‐Wall

A Surfacing Yes Good

9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐10 Sheet Rock‐Joint Second Floor: Hall A‐Wall A Joint compound Yes Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐9 Sheet Rock‐Surfacing Second Floor: Hall A‐Wall A Surfacing Yes Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐8 Cove Base Second Floor: Room 200‐Wall

C Misc No Good

W‐3 S‐7 Carpet & Glue Second Floor: Room 200‐Wall

F Misc No Good

9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐6 Carpet & Glue Second Floor: Room 200‐Wall

C Misc No Good No 9/6/2011

No 9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐5 Wall Paper Second Floor: Room 222‐Wall

A Misc No Good No

No 9/6/2011

W‐3 S‐4 Wall Paper Second Floor: Room 218‐Wall

C Misc No Good

W‐3 S‐3 Wall Paper Second Floor: Room 211‐Wall

D Misc No…