Amendment 0013.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

P856 Manchester Tank Farm Improvements, Manchester, WA

See page tw o for description of amendment.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jan-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4425521R2000

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Nov-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Jan-2021

CODE

NAVFAC NORTHWEST

1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE

SILVERDALE WA 98315-1101

N44255 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4425521R2000

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0013

a. Proposal due date changed.

b. Factor 1 – Experience changed.

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 21-Jan-2020 02:00 PM to 28-Jan-2021 02:00 PM.

1. Paragraph B. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD, page 13, (1) Factor 1 – Experience: pages 13 and 14 of the solicitation is changed as follows:

(1) Factor 1 – Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects best demonstrates experience on relevant projects that are similar in magnitude, scope, and complexity to the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) construction projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered. Failure to meet all of the stated criteria will result in in an unacceptable rating.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Similar in Magnitude: Construction project greater than $7,000,000.

Similar in Scope:

Construction of above ground fuel storage facilities with transfer pipelines for liquid fuel with minimum individual tank storage volume (capacity) of 50,000 barrels of fuel storage.

Construction of fuel tank secondary containment structures.

Demolition and removal of fuel storage tanks with individual volumes no less than 35,000 barrels.

Cathodic protection of field erected aboveground tanks and associated constructed fuel systems.

Automatic Tank Gauging (ATG) & Automatic Fuel Handling Equipment (AFHE) System installation with instrumentation and controls integration.

NOTE: Each submitted project must include one of the above scope elements, and associated tank capacity. Each of scope elements must be demonstrated at least once by the submitted projects.

N4425521R2000

Similar in Complexity: Planning and multidisciplinary construction of an above ground storage facility while integrating with an active fuel depot that will remain operational during the construction process or within a controlled (security gated) industrial area.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be substantially completed (85%) within the past ten (10) years preceding the original date of issuance of this solicitation.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A -DBB) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), partnership, or mentor protégé, recent and relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV, partnership, or mentor protégé entity. If the JV, partnership, or mentor protégé does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the JV, partnership, or mentor protégé members. At least one recent and relevant project shall be submitted for each JV, partnership, or mentor protégé member. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all JV, partnership, or mentor protégé members may be rated unacceptable. Offerors are still limited to five (5) projects combined. In addition, the offeror shall submit a signed copy of a JV agreement, partnership agreement, or approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA) for each member of the offeror’s JV team.

If the offeror's proposal presents the experience, past performance, or safety data of any entity with a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNs) or CAGE code that differs from that in the SF 1442 such as affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the information will not be considered unless the offeror establishes a basis for imputing the other entity's data to the offeror. The offeror must clearly explain why another entity's experience, past performance, or safety record is relevant to or indicative of the offeror's ability to perform this contract. A mere statement describing a corporate affiliation is insufficient; the offeror must also establish how the connection or nexus between it and the other entity relates to the offeror's qualifications. The explanation must be included in the solicitation attachment “Construction Experience Project Data Sheet”, required under Factor 1 - Experience (Construction). An offeror's failure to adequately justify a basis for crediting it with another entity's experience, past performance, or safety data may result in a deficiency, thereby making the offeror ineligible for award without discussions. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

(End of Summary of Changes)