Amendment 0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

PAGE OF PAGES

1 4

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Jan-2020

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. P ROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (Ifother than item6) CODE

NAVFAC MID

ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIT AT ION NO.

N4008519R9255

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Dec-2019

10A. MOD. OF CONT RACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. T HIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt ofthis amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one ofthe following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies ofthe amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt ofthis amendment on each copy ofthe offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegramwhich includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. Ifby virtue ofthis amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegramor letter, provided each telegramor letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIAT ION DAT A (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICAT IONS OF CONT RACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONT RACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. T HIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT T O: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORT H IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINIST RAT IVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO T HE AUT HORIT Y OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INT O PURSUANT TO AUT HORIT Y OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT : Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT /MODIFICAT ION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Continuation.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions ofthe document referenced in Item9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONT RACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNIT ED ST AT ES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

06-Jan-2020

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

30-105-04 ST ANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N4008519R9255

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

This amendment is hereby issued to:

1. Provide response to PPI #7-13.

Reference

Inquiry Government Response Page Section Paragraph of

00 21 16 Evaluation

Factors for

Award (Phase

I Proposals)

The second paragraph on RFP page 10 of 53

(Section 00 21 16) indicates, "In accordance with

FAR 36.303-1(a)(4), the solicitation states that the

Government shall select a maximum of three offerors to submit Phase II proposals, unless the

Government determines it is in its best interest to include up to a maximum of the five most highly qualified offerors." It is our understanding that

NAVFAC will limit the number of offerors shortlisted to phase II to a maximum of three according to recent Hurricane Florence Recovery

Industry Day events. Please confirm that the maximum number of offerors to be selected to participate in Phase II is three.

Bid per RFP.

of

00 21 16 Factor 2 -

Experience,

(a) Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements

Factor 2 defines relevant project experience as a

"single facility that is 20,000 square feet or greater for an Academic Facility, Dining Facility, Applied

Instruction Facility, Fire Station, Administrative

Facility, or Operations Facility." For design and construction experience, Factor 2 also indicates that “At least one of the relevant facilities meeting the above Size/Scope/Complexity requirements must be a Dining Facility". In cases where a single building includes multiple, distinct functional program spaces (e.g., a large operations building with a full-service dining facility on one floor), please confirm that the dining facility portion of the building must be over 20,000 SF in order for it to meet the intent of the size/scope/complexity requirement above and count as the “at least one” dining facility project.

Confirmed.

of

00 21 16 Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements

The last paragraph of Factor 2, (2) Design

Experience on page 15 of 53 indicates that "The

Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor." Please confirm that the necessary teaming agreement information and any related teaming explanation narrative is to be included in Factor 1 and not in Factor 2.

Confirmed.

of

00 21 16 Factor 3 - Past

Performance,

(2) Design

Past

Performance

In a government design-build project where the prime construction contractor holds the design-build contract, government clients are frequently not in a position to fill out PPQs for the contractor’s AE design-partner, since there is no direct contractual relationship between that government client and the AE firm. Since an

ACASS or design firm CPAR is not available for government design-build contracts, please confirm if it is acceptable for a design-build prime contractor (as the offeror) to submit the design-build prime contractor’s CPAR or CCASS evaluation as evidence of past performance of the design partner, if the design partner of the featured project is the same as the proposed design partner.

This is acceptable.

of

00 21 16 Factor 3 - Past

Performance,

(2) Design

Past

Performance

In a government design-build project where the prime construction contractor holds the design-build contract, government clients are frequently not willing to fill out PPQs for the contractor’s

AE design-partner, since there is no direct contractual relationship between that government client and the AE firm. And, of course, there is no

ACASS/CPAR provided to the design partner, for the same reason. Please clarify if a PPQ, filled out by the design-build contractor (offeror), is an acceptable evaluation for the AE partner’s design past performance, since the design-build contractor is a client of that AE firm.

This is acceptable.

of

SECTIO

N 00 70

00 -

CONDIT

IONS OF

THE

CONTR

ACT

52.211-

LIQUID

ATED

DAMAG

ES--

CONST

RUCTIO

N

N/A The LD rates per project were issued in RFP

Section 00 70 00, Clause 52.211-12. Please advise if the start of these LDs is: 1) for each project that is not completed before the 1826 calendar day total project allowance or 2) for each project that is not completed by it's individual completion date as stated (in the Phase 2 submission) in

Attachment H?

In accordance with the RFP, Factor 5 -

Project Management

Approach, (a)

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements, (4)

Schedule, "The awardee’s proposed project duration from award for each

Project will be incorporated into the contract. Upon award, each project will have a separate completion date."

Liquidated Damages will be assessed on a per Project basis based on the awardee's proposed completion date for each Project.

12 of

(b) Block 13A of the SF1442 instructs to submit one

(1) Original and Nine (9) Copies, however on page 12 of 53, paragraph "b. Non-price Factors,

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements", it says to submit One (1) Original and Six (6) copies.

Please confirm the correct number of proposal copies to be submitted with our Original proposal.

Correct Box 13A to read "Sealed offers in original and 6 copies to perform the work required"

(End of Summary of Changes)