About this file

Pre Proposal Agenda

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FINAL-_blank_Section_J_0200000-11_ELINS_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N40080-13-R-1608_0010.pdf PDF
0009.pdf PDF
9-1-Section_J_0200000.pdf PDF
Amendment_0008.pdf PDF
COMMON_OUTPUT_LEVELS.pdf PDF
Schedule_A.PDF PDF
final_J-0200000-11_ELINs-Rev_10-1-13.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amendment_07.pdf PDF
0006.pdf PDF
NAVFAC_DD254.PDF PDF
This_Notice_is_to_clarify_what_has_been_posted_to_FBO.pdf PDF
dd254.pdf PDF
Revised_J-1502000-06.pdf PDF
0005.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_J-1502000-04_398.pdf PDF
J-0200000-11_ELINs.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-0200000-12__Wage_Determination_WD_2005-2013_REV_13.pdf PDF
J-0200000-10_Partnering_Instruction.pdf PDF
J-1502000-11.pdf PDF
J-0200000-08_General_Security_Requirements.pdf PDF
J-0200000-02_CPAR_Form.pdf PDF
Full_RFP.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_C_Corporate_Experience_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
0004.pdf PDF
SITE_VISIT_SIGN_IN_SHEET1.PDF PDF
final_site_visit__PPT.ppt PPT presentation
APP_Review__Training_Power_Point.ppt PPT presentation
minutes_pre_proposal_confer.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_D_Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-0200000-09.pdf PDF
amendment_0003.pdf PDF
10-2-Section_J-_15020000_BLDG_399_FRE_ALM_INVT1.PDF PDF
Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
amendment_1.pdf PDF
Anacostia_CBA_with_IUOE_Local_99_10.1.2010-9.30.2013.pdf PDF
Anacostia_CBA_with_SEIU_Local_32BJ_10.1.2010-9.30.2013.pdf PDF
N4008013R1608_Synopsis_WHCA.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

AGENDA

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40080-13-D-1608

PROJECT TITLE: Facility Support Services ACTIVITY White House Communication and HMX LOCATION: Joint Base Anacostia Bolling, Washington DC

DATE: August 26, 2013

0900-0915 Welcome/Admin/Security Brief FEAD

0915-0930 Safety Brief Gerald Burbidge

0930-1015 RFP Presentation Marcus M. Sims

1015-1100 Questions and Answers Marcus M. Sims

1100-1145 Lunch On Site

1145-1155 Board Buses Bldg 370

1200-1700 Site Tours WHCA/HMX

NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS:

YOUR QUESTIONS ARE ENCOURAGED. PLEASE USE THE QUESTION SHEETS

PROVIDED TO SUBMIT YOUR QUESTION IN WRITING. QUESTIONS WILL BE

ANSWERED, IF POSSIBLE, DURING THE ALLOTTED QUESTION AND ANSWER

PERIOD.

MINUTES OF THE CONFERENCE, INCLUDING QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, WILL

BE POSTED ON THE NECO WEBSITE.

THE SOLICITATION REMAINS UNCHANGED UNLESS AN AMENDMENT IS

ISSUED.

AGENDA

1. Welcome/Introductions – LCDR Tamanh Duong, Facilities Engineering Acquisition Director, NAFVAC Joint Base Anacostia Bolling, Washington DC

Attendance Roster.

Please take a moment to sign the attendance roster. Minutes of the Pre-Proposal Conference minutes will be posted on the FBO website.

2. Background on JBAB/HMX/WHCA – LCDR Tamanh Duong, Facilities Engineering Acquisition Director, NAFVAC Joint Base Anacostia Bolling, Washington DC

Overview on JBAB transformation and the mission of WCHA and HMX

3. Safety – NAVFAC Field Office Safety Representative

4. Project Overview – Marcus M. Sims

Brief Overview of Section C and J

5. Contractual Background – Marcus M. Sims

a) FBO Registration.

Register at – https://www.fedbizopps.gov

b) The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm

The Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm

c) The Contract.

i) Advertised solicitation – https://www.fedbizopps.gov

ii) Posted amendments 0001 and 0002

iii) The awarded proposal.

iv) CAUTION – Today’s Q&As are not contractually binding.

6. Contract Procedures – Marcus M. Sims

a. Evaluation Factors

b. Source Selection Procedures

c. Proposal Requirements

d. Request for proposals (RFI) information/clarification questions

e. Points of Contact.

7. Site Tour – FSC Service Manager

8. Wrap-up – Contract Specialist https://www.fedbizopps.gov/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm https://www.fedbizopps.gov/

CONTRACT SPECIALIST BRIEF

1. Contract Procedures – Contract Specialist

a. EVALUATION FACTORS.

The Evaluation Factors for this acquisition are:

Factor 1 – Technical/Management Approach Factor 2 – Corporate Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

Offerors should respond specifically to the factor submittal requirements as described in the RFP. Failure to do so or to deviate from the RFP requirements may result in a less than favorable rating and could prevent an opportunity to receive the contract award if discussions are not held.

b. SOURCE SELECTION PROCEDURES

Two panels have been appointed to evaluated proposals.

The technical panel will focus on the technical proposal and the evaluation of past performance.

The price panel will evaluate proposed prices.

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offerors submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.”

3. Per NFAS 15.101-2, the number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the five lowest priced offers at the discretion of the contracting officer.

If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, technical proposals shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of prices or rank order of prices. If no proposals are found to be technically acceptable within the first group of proposals, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal.

4. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

The evaluation panel will brief the Source Selection Authority (SSA) who will make the final decisions.

c. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS.

1. The proposal submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clear, concise, and shall contain sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposals should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather should demonstrate convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the RFP. Nonconformance with the solicitation requirements, specified organization and content may result in elimination or misevaluation of the proposal. All claimed technical capabilities to meet the requirements shall be realistic and are subject to verification by the Government. Offerors should assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s business and that the Government will base its evaluation on the information contained in the offeror’s proposals.

2. Team Arrangements: FAR 9.6 defines contractor team arrangements. Team arrangements mean: (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractor under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

3. All offerors proposing a partnership, joint venture, other teaming arrangement, or resource of a parent company/subsidiary/affiliate shall submit the following information in the front of the technical and price proposals:

a. Provide a listing of the team members’ corporate name (no abbreviations), address, point of contact, phone number, DUNS Number, and CAGE code.

b. Submit a letter of commitment from the team members. The commitment letter shall clearly identify the expected relationship, role, and responsibility of the team member.

d. Proposal Organization and Number of Copies.

1. Volume 1: Technical Proposal - submit one (1) original and four (4) copies in 8-

1/2 x 11 format, font size 10. Proposals shall be submitted in three ring binders and tabbed appropriately by major evaluation factor and subfactors. In addition, submit two (2) complete copies of the technical proposal on CDs. The document should be Adobe Acrobat files (pdf format). No pen and ink changes are allowed. Page limit is one hundred twenty five (125) pages (front and back) total for Volume 1: Technical Proposal. Submission over this page limit will NOT be evaluated. The Government will accept 125 sheets of paper, either single sided or double sided.

2. Volume 2: Price Proposal - Submit one (1) original of the price proposal in a three ring binder. Submit on one (1) CD, a complete copy of the price proposal.

Documents should be in Microsoft Word or Excel. Please do not submit Adobe Acrobat files.

3. Staples or other binding shall not be used. Elaborate brochures or documentation, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

4. The proposal shall be written to the greatest extent possible on a stand-alone basis so that its content may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. Hyperlinking of cross-references is permissible. Information required for proposal evaluation, but not provided in its designated volume or cross-referenced, is assumed omitted from the proposal.

NOTICE TO OFFERORS:

a. Proposal Organization and Number of Copies.

Your acquisition points of contact for this project are Contract Specialist Marcus Sims at 202-685-8262, or email marcus.sims@navy.mil and Contracting Officer James Waite at 202-685-3141, or email james.h.waite@navy.mil.

The proposals and all copies shall be sent via Mail or hand-carried to the address and

POC shown below:

NAVFAC Washington mailto:marcus.sims@navy.mil mailto:james.h.waite@navy.mil

Attn: Marcus Sims 1314 Harwood Street SE, Bldg 212, First Floor Mail Room Washington Navy Yard Washington, DC 20374

Proposals must be received no later than 16 September 2013, 2:00 P.M local time

(EST).

If hand-delivering, please deliver to the first floor mailroom of BLDG 212 at the

Washington Navy Yard. Visitors will first need to obtain a visitor’s pass at the Visitor Office by entering the O St, SE and 11th St, SE gate.

Facsimile copies and email copies will NOT be accepted.

Please allow SUFFICIENT TIME for your proposal to be received prior to the proposed closing time.

Technical and Price proposals shall be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “Solicitation N40080-13-R-1608, DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM.”

**All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be stamped with the date and hour of receipt and held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 14.304-4.

d. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) INFORMATION/CLARIFICATION

QUESTIONS.

All questions from offerors concerning any aspect of this request for proposal (RFP) must be submitted in writing. Prospective offerors are requested to submit written questions specifying the section paragraph of the specification for which clarification is desired.

All inquiries will be answered in writing. Telephone questions will not be entertained.

Offerors are specifically cautioned that verbal discussions and replies to question shall not have the effect of changing the provisions of the written RFP.

Prospective offerors are required to review the entire solicitation package before submitting questions. Requests for Information (RFI’s) during the proposal preparation period shall be submitted by email to marcus.sims@navy.mil and james.h.waite@navy.mil. RFI’s must be submitted in a WORD document and submitted by the Prime Contractor only. Subcontractors with questions must submit them through the Prime Contractor.

THE RFI CUT-OFF DATE IS COB 3 Sept 2013.

mailto:marcus.sims@navy.mil mailto:james.h.waite@navy.mil

e. POINTS OF CONTACT.

Your points of contact for this solicitation are:

Contract Specialist: Marcus M. Sims Telephone: 202-685-8262

Procuring Contracting Officer: James Waite Telephone: 202-685-3141

QUESTION SHEET

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40080-13-D-1608

PROJECT TITLE: Facility Support Services ACTIVITY White House Communication and HMX LOCATION: Joint Base Anacostia Bolling, Washington DC

1.____________________________________________________________________________

2.____________________________________________________________________________

3.____________________________________________________________________________

4.____________________________________________________________________________

5.____________________________________________________________________________

6.____________________________________________________________________________

AGENDA
CONTRACT SPECIALIST BRIEF
a. EVALUATION FACTORS.
b. SOURCE SELECTION PROCEDURES
5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discu...
d. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) INFORMATION/CLARIFICATION QUESTIONS.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .