IDIQ PWS Attch 3 Midwest Del Rev Process BECOS vf2.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Midwest Region Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA890320R0015
About this file
This document outlines a deliverable review process for a federal contract. It details the review tasks, timeframes, and scope for contractors and regulators to follow for draft and final documents related to the contract. Key steps include contractors preparing working copies for review within dependent timeframes, regulators providing comments within 30 calendar days, contractors incorporating comments and preparing submittal letters, and regulators signing off on drafts within 7 calendar days or requesting further revisions. Final documents then go through regulatory acceptance, with timeframes varying according to involved agreements. The process aims to meet predetermined objectives and regulatory concurrence.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Air Force Materiel Command for Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Construction and Optimization Services in the Midwest Region. Additional details are provided in attachments to the solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Midwest Region has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA8903-20-R-0015
Midwest Region Attachment 3 5 December 2019
Deliverable Review Process Air Force Contractor Regulators Task: Prepare working copy document.
Timeframe: Dependent on task Scope: Dependent on task Task: Review working copy document.
Timeframe: 30 calendar days (max) Scope: Comments will focus on regulatory, factual, technical, and legal issues and should not conflict with the terms and conditions of the contract (e.g., directing the contractor on approach).
Tasks: Incorporate review comments. Prepare submittal letter.
Timeframe: Dependent on task Scope: Evaluate and incorporate all regulatory, factual, technical, and legal Air Force comments that do not conflict with the terms and conditions of the contract.
Task: Review draft document and sign submittal letter if document is acceptable. Return for further revisions if required.
Timeframe: 7 calendar days (max) Scope: Review and sign submittal letter. Provide letter to Contractor.
Task: Obtain regulatory review of draft document.
Timeframe: TBD Scope: Distribute submittal letter and document to regulators. Provide copies to the Air Force.
Task: Provide regulatory review.
Timeframe: FFA/DSMOA/Circumstantial Scope: Provide regulatory review of submitted document.
Tasks: Resolve comments and revise document. Prepare submittal letter.
Timeframe: TBD Scope: Provide timely evaluation and resolution of regulatory comments with a goal of meeting predetermined objectives.
Task: Submit final document.
Timeframe: TBD Scope: Submit final document for regulatory acceptance/concurrence.
Task: Review final document and sign submittal letter if document is acceptable. Return for further revisions if required.
Timeframe: 7 calendar days (max) Scope: Review and sign submittal letter. Provide letter to Contractor.
Task: Accept final document.
Timeframe: FFA/DSMOA/Circumstantial Scope: Accept final document and provide written notice.
Note: This is a generic document review process for this contract. Actual review times will be based on the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) where applicable or the Joint Execution Plan (JEP) and associated schedules developed under the Defense State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA). Agencies reviewing the document may make specific requests based on complexity of the deliverable or work load of their technical review team that impact review timelines. Depending on the document, there may or may not be a draft version or there may be multiple draft versions.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .