IDIQ PWS Attch 4 Midwest Perf Obj Def and Req BECOS vf2.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Midwest Region Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA890320R0015
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

This document provides performance objective definitions and requirements for a federal contract opportunity for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Construction and Optimization Services (BECOS) in the Midwest Region. The contract objectives include long-term management, remedial action-operation, response complete, and site closeout at various Department of Defense and Department of the Air Force sites. Requirements for each objective include continuation and optimization of established remedies, development and review of performance models, documentation of regulatory concurrence, and demonstration of progress toward completion milestones. The solicitation seeks optimization and completion of cleanup activities to achieve response complete or site closeout, including removal of remediation systems and monitoring wells and restoration of sites to conditions allowing unrestricted use.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Midwest Region, newest first.
File Type Posted
20200518_Midwest TO2 Price Model_Amendment_02.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20200518_TO2 PWS Attch1 Midwest Base Site List BECOS_Amendment_02.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
05182020_Amendment 02_Additional Question and Response 20R0015 Midwest.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20200501_FA890320R0015_BECOS_Midwest_Section_M_Amendment_01.docx DOCX document
20200501_Midwest TO2 Price Model_Amendment_01.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TO 2 PWS Attch 1 Midwest Base Site List BECOS_Amendment_01.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20-R-0015 Midwest RFP QAs 2 of 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20200203_FA890320R0015_Midwest_BECOS_Section_M v4.docx DOCX document
OH20190001 25Oct2019 Statewide Heavy.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A007-A008-A009 (ENVR) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Grissom Base Specific Req Midwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A014 (DRPR) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Midwest BECOS vf3.docx DOCX document
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Newark Base Spec Req Midwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
OH20190096 22Nov2019 Pickaway Building.pdf PDF
20201217_Compensation Plan Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MI20190048 1Nov2019 Marquette Heavy.pdf PDF
MO20190001 8Nov2019 Statewide Missouri.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 1 Midwest Base Site List BECOS vf9.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A001-A002-A004 (MISC) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
MI20190135 1Nov2019 Marquette Building.pdf PDF
MO20190038 8Nov2019 Cass Building.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A013 (MISC CONT) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Richards-Gebaur Base Spec Req Midwest BECOS vf3.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B004 (CMAN) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Gentile Base Spec Req Midwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Chanute Base Spec Req Midwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A010 (QCIC) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
Midwest IDIQ_Sched B_CLIN Structure and Price Model_v1_02032020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TO 1 PWS MidWest BECOS vf3.docx DOCX document
IN20190006 1Nov2019 Cass Heavy.pdf PDF
OH20190086 22Nov2019 Licking Building.pdf PDF
IL20190009 6Dec2019 Cook Building Heavy.pdf PDF
20200131_FA890320R0015_BECOS_Relevancy_Matrix v2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A005-A006-A011 (CMAN) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 1 CDRLs Exhibit A B Midwest BECOS vf1.docx DOCX document
OH20190093 25Oct2019 Montgomery Building.pdf PDF
IDIQ PWS Attch 3 Midwest Del Rev Process BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 General Mitchell Base Spec Req Midwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B002-B003 (MGMT) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IL20190002 6Dec2019 Champaign Building.pdf PDF
MI20190042 27Sep2019 Heavy Iosco.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A003-A012 (MGMT) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
MI20190116 1Nov2019 Delta Building.pdf PDF
MI20190047 1Nov2019 Delta Heavy.pdf PDF
20200203_FA890320R0015_BECOS_Midwest_Section_L v5.docx DOCX document
IDIQ PWS Midwest BECOS vf4.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT C001 (MGMT) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Midwest Base Site List BECOS vf6.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B005-B006-B007 (ADMN) Midwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
Show all 50

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Midwest Region has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

- Former Plattsburgh AFB PBR RFI - SOO Enclosure 5 Acronyms and Definitions

FA8903-20-R-0015

Midwest Region Attachment 4 5 December 2019

Performance Objectives (PO) Definitions and Requirements

PO - LTM:

Long-term Management LTM is defined as environmental monitoring, review of site conditions, and maintenance of a remedial action to ensure continued protection as designed once a site achieves response complete. Long-term management includes the operations and maintenance measures required to maintain the effectiveness of response actions and should be used until no further response actions are appropriate or anticipated. Examples of long-term management include landfill cap maintenance, leachate disposal (i.e., disposing of undesirable liquid material that drains from land or stockpiled material), fence monitoring and repair, performance of 5-year reviews, and land use control maintenance. [DoDI 4715.07, DERP, May 21, 2013]

Requirements for this objective include:

· Continuation of established activities required to ensure compliance with existing remedies as documented in the decision document (DD) at sites that have achieved RC, excluding emerging contaminants unless otherwise specified (e.g., landfill cap maintenance, groundwater monitoring, LUC inspection/monitoring/reporting, and Five-Year Reviews).

· LTM includes implementing cost-saving approaches where feasible.

· LTM may also include sites where activities are being completed by the AF or another contractor and the only remaining requirements are LTM.

PO – RA-O:

Remedial Action–Operation RA-O is defined as the period of time that a selected remedy must operate before achieving remedial action objectives. At the end of this phase of work, the response is complete. [DoDI 4715.07, DERP, May 21, 2013]

Requirements for this objective include:

· Continuation of remedial actions in accordance with the DD or current approach and optimization of the established remedy to continue to advance the site toward closure where feasible and cost effective to advance sites toward completion.

· Development and establishment of a performance model, including strategy, metrics, and model for the site which illustrates the anticipated progress towards achieving the proposed remediation goal by year during the PoP. Some possible optimization endpoints are: a) reduction in plume size exceeding cleanup levels, b) reduction in concentrations exceeding cleanup levels in specified wells, and c) reduction in monitoring requirements and other efforts.

· Review of monitoring data against the performance model to demonstrate adequate progress and measure the success of remedial action, as well as identify the need for alternative action where necessary, during the PoP.

· Demonstration that the proposed remediation goal has been achieved during the PoP using the performance metrics.

· Documentation of the remaining activities and a realistic schedule to achieve RC or SC, excluding emerging contaminants, after the PoP.

· Recommendations to accelerate site completion where feasible.

PO - RC:

Response Complete RC is defined as a milestone signifying that the DoD Component has met the remedial action objectives for a site, documented the determination, and sought regulatory agreement. Response complete signifies that DoD has determined at the end of the preliminary assessment or site inspection or remedial investigation that no additional response action is required; achieved remedy in place and the required remedial action-operation has achieved the remedial action objectives; or where there is no remedial action-operation phase, then the remedial action-construction has achieved the remedial action objectives. Long-term management may occur after response complete is achieved. [DoDI 4715.07, DERP, May 21, 2013]

Requirements for this objective include:

· Completion of all restoration activities necessary to achieve cleanup at sites where UU/UE is not the objective for remedial action and in accordance with applicable DDs and regulatory requirements for all contaminants (except emerging contaminants as noted below) and pathways associated with the site. This includes the removal and decommissioning of any remediation system or monitoring well network not required for LTM and site restoration consistent with the surrounding area, unless specifically excluded by the AF.

· Written documentation from the regulatory agencies of NFA with restrictions or equivalent determination with respect to the contamination resulting from the site with the exception of LTM (such as monitoring, maintenance, LUCs, and Five-Year Reviews). Where regulatory acceptance/concurrence cannot be obtained within the PoP, provide documents acceptable to the AF to achieve RC, in accordance with applicable DDs, laws, and regulations.

· Optimization of the established remedy where feasible and cost effective to achieve RC.

· Development and establishment of a performance model, including strategy, metrics, and model for the site, which illustrates the anticipated progress towards achieving RC by year during the PoP.

· Review of monitoring data against the performance model to demonstrate adequate progress and measure the success of remedial action, as well as identify the need for alternative action where necessary, during the PoP.

· For sites with both emerging contaminants and non-emerging contaminants, the Contractor can achieve RC as defined above with the exception of regulatory concurrence within the PoP for non-emerging contaminants where it can be demonstrated that no further activities are required for non-emerging contaminants associated with the site with the exception of LTM. The same conditions for achieving RC would apply to non-emerging contaminants contamination.

PO - SC:

Site Closeout The stage at which the DoD has completed active management and monitoring at an environmental restoration site, and no additional environmental restoration funds will be expended at the site. SC occurs when environmental restoration goals have been achieved that allow UU/UE of the property (e.g., no further LTM, including LUCs, is required). Also may be a no further action. [DoDM 4715.20, March 9, 2012] Requirements for this objective include:

· Completion of all restoration activities necessary to achieve cleanup resulting in unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (UU/UE) and in accordance with applicable DDs and regulatory requirements for all contaminants (except emerging contaminants as noted below) and pathways associated with the site. This includes the removal and decommissioning of any remediation system or monitoring network and site restoration consistent with the surrounding area, unless specifically excluded by the AF.

· Written documentation from the regulatory agencies of no further action (NFA) or equivalent determination with respect to contamination resulting from the site that includes no further monitoring, maintenance, LUCs, or Five-Year Reviews. Where regulatory acceptance/concurrence cannot be obtained within the PoP, provide closeout documents acceptable to the AF to achieve closeout in accordance with applicable DDs, laws, and regulations.

· Demonstrating to the AF that no additional known AF financial liabilities associated with the site exist (e.g., wells and systems decommissioned, site restored, no further LUC responsibilities that could generate costs to the AF).

· Optimization of the established remedy where feasible and cost effective to achieve SC.

· Development and establishment of a performance model, including strategy, metrics, and model for the site which illustrates the anticipated progress towards achieving SC by year during the PoP.

· Review of monitoring data against the performance model to demonstrate adequate progress and measure the success of remedial action, as well as identify the need for alternative action where necessary, during the PoP.

· For sites with both emerging contaminants and non-emerging contaminants, the Contractor can SC as defined above with the exception of regulatory concurrence within the PoP for non-emerging contaminants associated with the site where it can be demonstrated that no further activities are required for non-emerging contaminants. The same conditions for achieving SC would apply to non-emerging contaminants.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .