Group_C_Final_RFP_QA_157-165.pdf

PDF 480 KB Posted

Attached to
SOCOM Wide Mission Support (SWMS) Group C Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
H92222-14-R-0019
Issued by
United States Special Operations Command

About this file

Questions and answers pertaining to the Group C Final RFP.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SOCOM Wide Mission Support (SWMS) Group C, newest first.
File Type Posted
H92222-14-R-0019_Amendment_0005.doc DOC document
Amend_05_Atch_1_Revision_2_9-9-2014.pdf PDF
Amend_04_Atch_3_Pricing_Rev_4_9-8-2014.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H92222-14-R-0019_Amendment_0004.doc DOC document
Final_Group_C_QnA_181-183.pdf PDF
140905_Final_RFP_QnA_175-180.pdf PDF
H92222-14-R-0019_Amendment_0003.doc DOC document
Amend_03_Atch_3_Pricing_Rev_3_9-5-2014.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H92222-14-R-0019_Amendment_0002.doc DOC document
140904_Final_RFP_QnA_166-174.pdf PDF
Amend_02_Atch_3_Pricing_Rev_2_9-3-2014.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H92222-14-D-0019_Amend_0001.doc DOC document
Amend_01-Summary_of_Changes_RFP_Attachments.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_5a_Rev_1_8-20-14.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_6a_Revision_1_8-20-14.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_7a_Revision_1_8-20-14.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_2_Group_DD254_Rev_1.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_1_Revision_1_8-20-14.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_7b_J8S_DD254_Rev_1.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_5b_SORDAC_DD254_Rev_1.pdf PDF
140825_FBO_Group_C_QnA_80-156.pdf PDF
Amend_01_Atch_3_Pricing_Rev_1_8-22-2014.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_QA_57-79.pdf PDF
RFP_QA_1-56.pdf PDF
Atch_8_Group_C_PPI.doc DOC document
Atch_5b_SORDAC_TO_DD254.pdf PDF
Atch_7a_J8-S_Analytical_and_Technical_Support_SOW.pdf PDF
Atch_6a_SOFM_SOW.pdf PDF
Atch_2_Group_C_DD254.pdf PDF
Atch_12_Modified_SF1408.doc DOC document
Atch_5a_SORDAC_SOW.pdf PDF
Atch_11_Client_Auth.doc DOC document
Atch_7b_J8-S_DD254.pdf PDF
Atch_3_Pricing_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_6b_SOFM_DD254.pdf PDF
Atch_1_Group_C_SOW.pdf PDF
Atch_10_Consent_Letter.doc DOC document
Atch_9_Group_C_PPQ.doc DOC document
Final_Group_C_RFP.doc DOC document
Exhibit_A_CDRLS.pdf PDF
140714_Group_C_Labor_Categories_Rev_1.pdf PDF
140710_Group_C_Labor_Categories.pdf PDF
Group_C_Draft_RFP_Sample_SOO.doc DOC document
Draft_H92222-14-R-0019_SWMS_Group_C_SOFM_SOW.doc DOC document
DRAFT_H92222-14-R-0019_SWMS_Group_C.doc DOC document
Show all 45

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

# RFP Ref. Question/Comment Response Amend # 157 Question 41 & 60 Are BOEs to be submitted only when the offeror does not use the

Government’s labor categories and FTEs?

Discussion—updates to Questions 41 and 60 say that “Any BOE will be part of the Cost Volume.” The SOWs and the pricing templates specify in detail the labor categories for each task order, and the number of FTEs in each. We are presuming the reference to BOE means a BOE that explains why a particular position is necessary and how much time that position needs to devote to the task. There seems no need for an offeror to submit a BOE if the offeror intends to price the labor categories and FTEs as listed by the Government.

are BOEs to be submitted only when the offeror does not use the Government’s labor categories and FTEs?

Discussion—updates to Questions 41 and 60 say that “Any BOE will be part of the Cost Volume.” The SOWs and the pricing templates specify in detail the labor categories for each task order, and the number of FTEs in each. We are presuming the reference to BOE means a BOE that explains why a particular position is necessary and how much time that position needs to devote to the task. There seems no need for an offeror to submit a BOE if the offeror intends to price the labor categories and FTEs as listed by the Government.

The BOE references refer to the basis of an offeror’s direct labor rates, indirect rates, and proposed hours (offeror’s may calculate a man-year differently than the government’s assumption of 1880).

N/A

158 L4.3 Are the BOEs being referred to the same as the substantiation of direct labor rates described in L4.3?

Discussion—updates to Questions 41 and 60 explain that “Any BOE will be part of the Cost Volume.” The SOWs and the pricing templates specify in detail the labor categories for each task order, and the number of FTEs in each. There does not seem a need to justify the labor category or the FTEs, only the direct labor rate being used for the position.

The BOE references refer to the basis of an offeror’s direct labor rates, indirect rates, and proposed hours (offeror’s may calculate a man-year differently than the government’s assumption of 1880). Regarding labor categories, if the Government labor category detailed in the Attachment 3 is not the same as the labor category used by the offeror’s company, map the Government labor category based on the required qualifications and experience level to the labor category used by your company. In addition, provide the labor category title used by your company.

N/A

159 L4.5 What substantiation is the offeror required to provide for subcontractor FFP/T&M fully loaded rates? We read L4.5 as requiring only a cost or price analysis of the subcontractors’ rates, and not Attachment 3? Is this correct?

Discussion—L4.5 says the prime has the subcontractor submit Attachment 3 when the prime cannot determine reasonableness of the subcontractors FFP or T&M fully loaded rates. If the prime can determine reasonableness and does provide the cost or price analyses, it does not appear that Attachment 3 needs to be filled out by the subcontractors. However an earlier sentence in L4.5 says the offeror will provide the same level of detail for subcontractors as required of the prime. L3.4 says the offeror and any subcontractors shall submit detailed substantiation for all direct labor rates for which there is no available FPRA.

The Offeror may submit the subcontractor's fully loaded labor rate if they can provide support for the prime's determination of price reasonableness for the FFP/T&M labor rate. If the Prime cannot determine the reasonableness of the proposed subcontractor rates, then the buildup of the rates is required. Otherwise, they may submit the fully loaded labor rate on Attach 3.

N/A

160 L1.4 How long does it take for mail to be delivered from the Joint Mail Screening Facility to the Command Mailroom?

Discussion—the answer to question 106 says packages are date/time stamped when they reach the Command Mailroom. The answer to Question 107 says mail and packages received through commercial carriers and the USPS is screened at the Joint Mail Screening Facility prior to being delivered to the Command Mailroom. Can the Government clarify how much time offerors should allow for the Screening facility to deliver our proposals to the Mailroom where the proposal will be time/date stamped?

All mail delivered to the JMSF is delivered to Command on the same day. No mail or packages are stored or held overnight in the JMSF.

N/A

161 L4.6 Can the Government clarify whether offerors are to indicate a max fee?

And if so, are offerors to write it into the cost volume, as there is no place on Attachment 3 for it?

Discussion—the clarification to answer 63 says the requirement to propose a max fee for future task orders will be removed. However, L4.6 says “the proposed fee will become the maximum allowable fee on all future task orders. For task orders 1-3, the Offeror may elect to propose a lower fee. The fee per Task Orders 1-3 will be input on the Tab 2.”

The max fee language was inadvertently left in the language of Amendment 0001. Amendment 0002 will revise L4.6 as follows:

L4.6 Fee. IAW FAR 15.404-4(c) For other cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts, the fee shall not exceed 10 percent of the contract’s estimated cost, excluding fee. The fee per Task Orders 1 – 3 will be input on the Tab 2.

162 General If an unpopulated joint venture (JV) is established to be the small business prime, will SOCOM/SORDAC treat the individual members’ past performance as the JV’s past performance?

SOCOM will evaluate individual joint venture member’s past performance as part of the Past Performance assessment.

N/A

163 General Will the facility clearance (FCL) of the managing member of an unpopulated JV be viewed as the JV’s FCL?

No. An FCL is required for the JV . And SOCOM’s understanding is that each of the joint venturers needs to have an FCL in order to receive an FCL for the JV.

Suggest you contact the Defense Security Service for additional information.

N/A

164 SF1408 Is it acceptable to submit the completed form and provide instructions on how to access the supporting documentation via a company sponsored, secure web-site? Many companies maintain records, policies, and procedures electronically and extracts from those records are considered uncontrolled copies. Providing support data via a secure web-site would ensure that data is protected and easier to find and retrieve.

Please refer to your DCAA POC. N/A

165 H.4 There were several inconsistencies with the H.4 CPFF-LOA language Amendment 0002 will include a revision to H.4 02

H92222-14-R-0019 Final RFP Group C Q&A's (Questions 157-165)

POSTED TO FBO 8-28

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .