Section L - Attachment 4 LAS SOO for LAS Aircraft and GTD

FA8637-10-R-6000-0007

Section L, Attachment 4, Amendment 7

10 June 2011

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

FOR

LIGHT AIR SUPPORT AIRCRAFT

And

GROUND TRAINING DEVICES

10 June 2011

Prepared by

Light Attack Branch

ASC/WWYA

AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS CENTER

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OHIO

10 June 2011Page 2 of 16

Table of Contents

1.0 SCOPE

1.1 Background

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 US Government Documents. ................................................................................................... 43.0

OBJECTIVES

3.1 General

3.2 Aircraft Production

3.2.1 Aircraft Certification

3.3 Ground Training Devices (GTDs)

3.4 First Article Test (FAT)

3.5 Inspection, Acceptance and Delivery

3.5.1 Delivered LAS Aircraft Configuration

3.5.2 Other LAS Equipment

3.6 Configuration Management

3.6.1 Change Management Process

3.6.2 Configuration Status Accounting (CSA)

3.6.3 Commercial Service Actions

3.7 Systems Engineering

3.7.1 Software Documentation

3.7.2 Support to USG

3.7.3 Structural Integrity Program

3.7.3.1 Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP)

3.7.3.2 Engine Structural Integrity Program (ENSIP)

3.8 System, Ground and Flight Safety Program

3.9 Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH)

3.10 Manufacturing Management

3.11 Aircraft Interim Contractor Support (ICS)

3.12 GTD Contractor Logistics Support (CLS)

3.13 Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)

3.14 Information Assurance (IA), Critical Program Information (CPI) and Anti-Tamper

3.15 Flight Operations Manuals (FOM), Organizational-Level (O-Level) Maintenance Manuals, Weapons Loading Manuals, and Checklists

3.16 Program Management

3.16.1 Program Management Reviews

3.16.2 Contract Work Breakdown Structure

3.16.3 Integrated Master Plan; Integrated Master Schedule

3.16.4 Administrative Support

10 June 2011Page 3 of 16

3.16.5 Operations Security (OPSEC)

3.16.6 Import/Export Licenses

3.16.7 [Reserved] ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.16.8 Contract Funds Status Report

3.17 Risk Management

3.18 Management Information

3.19 Quality

3.20 Warranties

3.21 Calibration

3.22 Human Engineering

3.23 Air Advisor Training

3.24 Aircraft and GTD Modifications

3.25 Item Unique Identification (IUID)

Glossary

10 June 2011Page 4 of 16

1.0 SCOPE. The Light Air Support (LAS) aircraft is a non-developmental aircraft being procured for conducting advanced flight training, surveillance, air interdiction and close air support. The LAS aircraft shall be a single-engine turboprop fixed-wing aircraft with tricycle, retractable landing gear, tandem two-place pressurized cockpit with ejection seats, capable of operating from semi-prepared air fields and employing various munitions from NATO-compatible hard points. Ground training devices

(GTDs) may be procured to support pilot training. Interim Contractor Support (ICS) will be required for all maintenance and supply requirements for the aircraft and associated support equipment for the first year of LAS operations, with options for additional ICS as required.

1.1 Background. The LAS is being procured to support the US objective of improving the capabilities of the Building Partnership Capability partner nation forces.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS. The following documents are applicable to this Statement of

Objectives and attached appendices to the extent specified herein.

2.1 US Government Documents.

MIL-HDBK-516B, Change 1 Airworthiness Certification

Criteria 29 February 2008

MIL-HDBK-61A

Configuration Management

Guidance 7 February 2001

MIL-STD-1530C

Aircraft Structural Integrity

Program 1 November 2005

DODI 5000.02

Operation of the Defense

Acquisition System 8 December 2008

Defense Systems Acquisition

Guidebook 19 March 2010

MIL-STD-882D

Standard Practices for System

Safety 10 February 2000

MIL-STD-130N

Identification Marking of U.S.

Military Property 17 December 2007

DFARS 252.228-7005

Accident Reporting and

Investigation Involving Aircraft, Missiles, and Space Launch

Vehicles

23 November 2009

Manufacturing Readiness

Assessment (MRA) Deskbook, Version 7.1

2 May 2009

MIL-HDBK-1783B W/Change 2 Engine Structural Integrity

Program (ENSIP) 22 September 2004

DODI 8500.2

Information Assurance (IA)

Implementation 6 February 2003

DOD 5200.1-R

DOD Information Security

Program 13 December 1996

AFI 31-401

Managing the Information

Security Program 22 July 1994

10 June 2011Page 5 of 16

Integrated Master Plan and

Integrated Master Schedule

Preparation and Use Guide, Version 9

21 October 2005

MIL-HDBK-881A

Breakdown Structures for

Defense Materiel Items 30 July 2005

Risk Management Guide for

DOD Acquisition, 6th Edition August 2006

AS 9100, Rev C

Quality Management Systems -

Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense

Organizations

MIL-HDBK-46855A

Human Engineering Program

Process and Procedures 17 May 1999

2.2 Non-Government standards and other publications.

ANSI/EIA-649A

National Consensus Standard for

Configuration Management

ANSI/NCSL Z540.3 2006

Technical requirements for the calibration of measuring and test equipment

Unless otherwise indicated, copies of specifications, standards and handbooks listed above are available from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Ave, Bldg 4D, Philadelphia PA 19111-

5094 Application for copies of Non-Government standards and other publications should be addressed to the name and address of the source.

3.0 OBJECTIVES.

3.1 General. The work required by this contract shall be performed in accordance with (IAW) LAS

System Requirements Document (SRD), the GTD SRD, and this Statement of Objectives (SOO) and all

Section J attachments to the model contract. This SOO provides general direction for performance of the

LAS production program. The contractor shall develop a Statement of Work that describes these requirements in detail and provides the approach to performing the tasks. Performance Work Statements

(PWSs) are included for Interim Contractor Support (ICS), GTDs Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), and Air Advisor Training. The contractor shall develop Contractor PWSs that provide the contractor’s approaches to performing the PWS requirements. A fixed price single-award Indefinite Delivery

Indefinite Quantity contract will be established to provide delivery of LAS aircraft/ICS, GTDs/CLS, Air

Advisor Training and associated support.

3.2 Aircraft Production. The contractor shall manufacture and deliver USAF Airworthiness

Military Type Certified LAS aircraft as identified in Delivery Orders. Pricing shall be as directed in http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/joint.cgi/9000store/cgi-bin/detail?product_id=1599705 http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/joint.cgi/9000store/cgi-bin/detail?product_id=1599705 http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/joint.cgi/9000store/cgi-bin/detail?product_id=1599705 http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/joint.cgi/9000store/cgi-bin/detail?product_id=1599705

10 June 2011Page 6 of 16

Section L of the Request for Proposal (RFP). Schedule details shall be documented in the Integrated

Master Schedule (see paragraph 3.16.3).

3.2.1 Aircraft Certification. LAS aircraft will be USAF Airworthiness military type certified under the approach presented in MIL-HDBK-516B, Change 1

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=212162). Aircraft certification shall include aircraft operation with associated weapons identified as threshold requirements in the SRD.

For certification purposes, the LAS aircraft is not considered a commercial derivative. A Technical

Interchange Meeting (TIM) shall be hosted by the contractor within 30 days after contract award to jointly finalize and begin implementation of the plan to achieve USAF Airworthiness military type certification.

This plan shall be described as part of the Integrated Master Plan (IMP). The contractor shall provide the

USG access to any requested data required for certification purposes. The requested certification data shall be available for Government review not later than 90 days after contract award. If the USG determines that the data is insufficient with respect to the certification criteria identified in MIL-HDBK-

516B Change 1, the LAS Program Office will notify the contractor. Upon notification the contractor shall develop and execute the steps required to provide sufficient verification data for the certification.

Sufficiency of test data and system verification resides with the LAS Program Office. Additional certification TIMs may be necessary to allow for USG engineer-to-contractor engineer discussions of test results, design and production data. USAF Military Type Certification shall be complete no later than 90 days before Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). In accordance with the above provision, the Contractor shall submit sufficient data to ensure USAF Military

Type Certification occurs on or before such date (see 3.6). FCA / PCA and certification of the first LAS production asset will be accomplished by the USG before issuing Material Inspection and Receiving

Report (DD Form 250). FCA/PCA confirms the final configuration meets LAS SRD requirements; the aircraft was built to the manufacturing and engineering specification; and meets air worthiness requirements. Commercial derivative certification described in AFPD 62-6, paragraph 1.6, shall in no event be used as a substitute certification process for the aforementioned MILHDBK approach. (DI-

SESS-81766, A001)

3.3 Ground Training Devices (GTDs). The contractor shall produce and deliver LAS GTDs to support pilot training in accordance with the GTD SRD and CLS/GTD operation in accordance with the

Performance Work Statement (PWS). These shall include a Flight Training Device (FTD), Basic

Aviation Training Device (BATD) and Computer-Based Training (CBT).

3.4 First Article Test (FAT). FAT is defined as the combination of all activities necessary to verify aircraft and GTDs meet the design and performance requirements and are ready for production. If, at the time of proposal submittal, the proposed aircraft and/or GTDs have not successfully completed FAT in the specific configuration as proposed, the contractor shall provide a comprehensive, technically sound, realistic and reasonable plan for completing FAT as part of the IMP. LAS aircraft FAT shall be accomplished by the contractor prior to contract award. LAS GTDs FAT shall be accomplished prior to ordering any GTDs on the LAS contract. The contractor shall submit Letters of Completion to the USG verifying successful completion of FAT for LAS aircraft and GTDs. USG reserves the right to review and verify any documentation supporting FAT.

https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=212162

10 June 2011Page 7 of 16

3.5 Inspection, Acceptance and Delivery. A USG inspection and acceptance of each aircraft shall occur at the contractor’s facility to assure conformity with contract requirements. The DD Form 250 for each unit will document USG inspection and acceptance. Aircraft presented for inspection and acceptance must conform to the requirements as stated in Para 3.5.1 below. For LAS aircraft, the DD

Form 250 will specify a conditional acceptance with final acceptance at destination (to include transfer of title). After conditional acceptance at the contractor’s facility, the contractor shall ferry the aircraft to destination as directed by the contracting officer in accordance with terms of the contract or as specified in the delivery order. For the aircraft, conditional acceptance shall be converted to acceptance upon successful ferry and landing at destination. This shall include removal of any changes made solely for ferrying purposes, functional checks and contractor completion of repairs required in making the aircraft fully mission capable (FMC). Upon arrival, the contractor shall restore the aircraft to fully mission capable status as part of ferry. Representatives of the USG will conduct a final inspection at destination to determine that the items are operationally ready and recommend release of the conditional acceptance be accomplished by Procuring Contracting Officer Letter (PCOL). The contractor shall develop and submit for Government approval an Aircraft Acceptance Test Plan and Procedure that defines the procedures for conditional acceptance at the contractor’s facility, to include inspection and final acceptance after restoration to fully mission capable status in-country. The offeror shall develop and deliver a Ferry and Transportation Plan that describes how export/import clearance is obtained for LAS aircraft as well as the procedures for ferrying the aircraft to the final delivery destination.

GTD acceptance shall occur upon successful shipment, installation and fully capable operation of the

GTDs at destination. Also, the contractor shall develop and submit for Government approval individual

Ground Training Device Acceptance Test Plans and Procedures that define the procedure for acceptance at the contractor’s facility, to include inspection and final acceptance after restoration to fully mission capable status in-country. Acceptance Test Plans and Procedures will be attached to the contract after award. The Contractor shall support Government-conducted acceptance tests and generate acceptance test reports documenting the results of acceptance tests. The offer shall include in the Ferry and

Transportation Plan how import/export clearance is obtained for GTDs as well as procedures for shipping them to the final delivery destination.

Other equipment purchased and not included with each LAS aircraft or GTD shall be accepted after shipment to and inspection at the location designated by each DO. Other equipment includes, but is not limited to, the items presented in Para 3.5.2 below.

See ASC/LAS-H031 LIGHT AIR SUPPORT (LAS) AIRCRAFT INSPECTION, FERRY, AND

ACCEPTANCE (JUL 2010). (DI-QCIC-80553A, A002; DI-NDTI-80603A/T, A003; DI-NDTI-

80809B/T, A004; DI-MGMT-80004A/T, A025)

3.5.1 Delivered LAS Aircraft Configuration. Each contractor aircraft presented for inspection and acceptance as LAS aircraft shall fully conform to the Aircraft Specification, be properly represented in the approved Flight Operations Manual (FOM) and Organization-Level (O-Level) Maintenance Manuals, and include all mission equipment necessary to accomplish the Standard LAS Combat Mission as defined in

Paragraph 2.3.2 of Section L, Attachment L-2, SRD for Acquisition of LAS Aircraft and Section J, 10 June 2011Page 8 of 16

Attachment 36, Aircraft SRD-Functional Baseline In addition, each delivered aircraft shall include seat survival kit equipment with each ejection seat. Each survival kit shall be equipped as defined in the LAS

FOM and shall contain, at a minimum, one each of the items of Para 3.5.1.1 below.

3.5.1.1 Minimum Ejection Seat Survival Kit Equipment (SKE):

3.5.1.1.1 Inflatable Life Raft Assembly

3.5.1.1.2 Visual Signal Device

3.5.1.1.3 Life Raft Repair Kit

3.5.1.1.4 First Aid Kit

3.5.1.1.5 Survival Radio with GPS

3.5.1.1.6 Survival Locator Beacon with GPS

3.5.1.1.7 Compacted Sleeping Bag

3.5.2 Other LAS Equipment. To support expanded operations, individual LAS customers may desire to purchase additional quantities of LAS aircraft equipment, Alternate Mission Equipment (AME), GTD equipment and LAS unique Support Equipment (SE). These items are equipment required by the FOM, O-Level Maintenance Manuals, GTD operations manual, or GTD maintenance manuals. The contractor shall provide for DO purchase, at a minimum, the following items:

3.5.2.1 EO/IR Imaging Sensor

3.5.2.2 External Fuel Tanks and Mated Pylon (with Fairing if part of LAS aircraft)

3.5.2.3 Travel Pod

3.5.2.4 Weapon Pylon (with Fairing if part of LAS aircraft)

3.5.2.5 Flare/Chaff Magazine (if part of LAS aircraft)

3.5.2.6 Flare/Chaff Cover (if available)

3.5.2.7 50 Cal Internal Machine Gun (if part of LAS aircraft)

3.5.2.8 Machine Gun Magazine (if part of LAS aircraft)

3.5.2.9 Machine Gun Port Cover (if available)

3.5.2.10 EO/IR Imaging Sensor Cover (if required)

3.5.2.11 HUD Laser Range Finder (if part of LAS aircraft)

3.5.2.12 HUD Laser Range Finder Cover (if available)

3.5.2.13 Pilot IFR Practice Shield/Cover

3.5.2.14 Removable Armor Set

3.5.2.15 Illumination Flare Dispenser

3.5.2.16 50 Cal Machine Gun Pod

3.5.2.17 2.75” (70 mm) Folding Fin Rocket Pod

3.6 Configuration Management. The contractor shall develop and deliver specifications that document the final design, performance, and characteristics of the weapon system (aircraft, GTDs and interfaces). At a minimum, each threshold requirement in the LAS and GTD SRDs shall be included and objective requirements as may be proposed by the contractor for contractual incorporation. These specifications shall include verification sections covering each requirement in the specification. The

10 June 2011Page 9 of 16 verification section, to include the verification date, shall cite all actual analyses, simulation results, test results, test reports and inspections detailing how the contractor’s aircraft/GTDs specifications meet LAS and GTD SRDs requirements. Any configuration changes or deviations from this specification must be processed through a formal Configuration Control Board chaired by the U.S. Government per ANSI/EIA-

649A, National Consensus Standard for Configuration Control. Refer to MIL-HDBK-61A for guidance

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=202239). The contractor shall develop a Configuration Management Plan for the LAS system to include aircraft and GTDs that align with ASC/LAS-H036, Configuration Baselines and Changes (Aug 2010) and ASC/LAS-H029, Change

Management Instructions to Include Engineering Change Proposals, Configuration Change Proposals, Deficiencies and Nonconforming Items (Aug 2010) The contractor shall support the Government in conducting a combined Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and Physical Configuration Audit (PCA).

The contractor shall prepare and submit a Configuration Audit Plan. The FCA and PCA must occur at least 30 days prior to first DD Form 250 processing in order to provide time to clear all action items.

FCA / PCA and certification of the first LAS aircraft and GTD will be accomplished by the USG before

DD250. FCA/PCA confirms the final configuration meets LAS SRD requirements; the item was built to the manufacturing and engineering specification; and the aircraft meets air worthiness requirements.

(DI-SDMP-81493/T, A005; DI-CMAN-80858B, A006; DI-SESS-81628, A026)

3.6.1 Change Management Process. The contractor shall implement and maintain a change management process to develop, document, and process Specification Change Notices (SCNs), Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Airworthiness Directives (ADs)/Service Bulletins/Advisory Data, Contract Change Proposals (CCPs), Notice of Revision (NOR), and Request for Deviations. The contractor shall develop a Supplemental Airworthiness Specification, Airworthiness Plan and GTD specification for each ECP. (DI-CMAN-80643C/T, A007; DI-CMAN-80639C/T, A008; DI-MISC-

81241/T, A009; DI-CMAN-80640C/T, A010; DI-CMAN-81401B, A011; DI-CMAN-80642C, A012)

3.6.2 Configuration Status Accounting (CSA). The contractor shall document and maintain CSA information capturing the current change status and change history, as-designed, as-built, as-delivered, or as-modified configuration, for any serial number and any component within the LAS system. The contractor shall develop and document status reports which capture time change status, ADs and service alert status, service related issues, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or equivalent, configuration status and airworthiness reports, and service action kit status. (DI-CMAN-81253A/T, A013; DI-MGMT-

80368A/T, A014)

3.6.3 Commercial Service Actions. The contractor shall review new and revised vendor and supplier literature (service bulletins, service letters, advisories, instructions, etc.) that affect the LAS aircraft/GTD system configuration, maintenance, airworthiness or operational requirements and provide recommendations to the Government as required. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A015).

3.7 Systems Engineering. The contractor shall employ sound systems engineering discipline into developing an integrated, life-cycle balanced solution of products and processes in compliance with using

DoD Instruction 5000.02, Enclosure 12 (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/500002p.pdf) and

Defense Systems Acquisition Guide Book, Chapter 4

(https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=346680). All design, integration, and testing shall be conducted utilizing the contractor systems engineering approach. The contractor shall conduct https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=202239 http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/500002p.pdf https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=346680

10 June 2011Page 10 of 16 engineering investigations and analyses to address Government inquiries or concerns in areas including, as a minimum: LAS aircraft/GTD design, performance, airworthiness, reliability, safety and other technical related items. The contractor shall provide to the USG their approach to systems engineering for the LAS aircraft/GTD in an LAS Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP). (DI-SESS-81785/T, A016)

3.7.1 Software Documentation. The contractor shall develop and maintain software documentation for any software developed for the LAS system. (DI-IPSC-81756/T, A017)

3.7.2 Support to USG. The contractor shall support the USG in conducting planning, technical reviews, and completing military certifications.

3.7.3 Structural Integrity Program. The Contractor shall establish a Structural Integrity program for the

LAS Aircraft and Engine.

3.7.3.1 Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP). The Contractor shall develop a Structural Integrity

Program for the LAS Aircraft using MIL-STD-1530C as a guide

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=36952)

3.7.3.2 Engine Structural Integrity Program (ENSIP). The contractor shall establish an ENSIP using

MIL-HDBK-1783B W/Change 2 as a guide

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/A/0000/0020/5103/000000449683_000000163438_BZYCGQBXP

E.PDF?CFID=17197440&CFTOKEN=33845348&jsessionid=5c30e70592b26f8a5106752e135f305e4e3

2).

3.8 System, Ground and Flight Safety Program. The contractor shall implement a ground and flight safety program managed under an overall system safety process. Use MIL-STD-882D

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=36027) as a guide for the systems safety program and document this approach in a System Safety Plan. The contractor shall document their ground and flight safety programs in Ground and Flight Safety Plans. The contractor shall comply with the Mishap Notification/Reporting requirements of DFARS 252.228-7005

(http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252228.htm#252.228-7005) even in cases where the damaged property is fully indemnified by the contractor or its subcontractors. The contractor shall report accidents in an Accident/Incident Report. The contractor shall provide technical expertise and access to available aircraft related data, drawings, and records to support user mishap investigations. (DI-

SAFT-81563/T, A018; DI-SAFT-81066/T, C004; DI-SAFT-81626/T, C006)

3.9 Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH). The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain an ESOH program to identify and eliminate, reduce or control ESOH risks and hazards within the constraints of program cost, schedule and performance throughout the life cycle of the system. Refer to DFARS 222.102-1 (http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/222_1.htm)

3.10 Manufacturing Management. The contractor shall conduct Manufacturing Readiness

Assessments (MRA) using the definitions, criteria, and processes defined in the DOD MRA Deskbook as a guide (http://www.dodmrl.com/MRL_Deskbook_v1.pdf). An MRA will be conducted with the LAS https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=36952 https://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/A/0000/0020/5103/000000449683_000000163438_BZYCGQBXPE.PDF?CFID=17197440&CFTOKEN=33845348&jsessionid=5c30e70592b26f8a5106752e135f305e4e32 https://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/A/0000/0020/5103/000000449683_000000163438_BZYCGQBXPE.PDF?CFID=17197440&CFTOKEN=33845348&jsessionid=5c30e70592b26f8a5106752e135f305e4e32 https://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/A/0000/0020/5103/000000449683_000000163438_BZYCGQBXPE.PDF?CFID=17197440&CFTOKEN=33845348&jsessionid=5c30e70592b26f8a5106752e135f305e4e32 https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=36027 http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252228.htm#252.228-7005 http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/222_1.htm http://www.dodmrl.com/MRL_Deskbook_v1.pdf

10 June 2011Page 11 of 16 program office not later than 30 calendar days after contract award at the contractor’s manufacturing facility. A follow-up MRA will be conducted not later than 20 calendar days thereafter if the

Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) is less than 9. The contractor shall conduct MRAs at suppliers and include program office participants as required by the USG. The contractor shall monitor and provide status at all program reviews (see 3.16.1) for in-house and major suppliers’ MRLs and shall re-assess MRLs in areas for which design and process changes have occurred which could impact the MRL.

The contractor shall maintain access to subcontractors of critical subsystems and components and establish subcontractor agreements as required. The contractor shall conduct required review, USG notification and resolution of technology obsolescence and life-limited items at the prime or subcontract level. The contractor shall develop and report forecasting source data for Diminishing Manufacturing

Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS). No additional funding will be provided for on-going actions to assess and attain the required MRL assessments. (DI-SESS-81656/T, A032)

3.11 Aircraft Interim Contractor Support (ICS). Support shall be conducted in accordance with the contractor ICS Performance Work Statements (Section J, Attachments 7 and 8).

3.12 GTD Contractor Logistics Support (CLS). Support shall be conducted in accordance with the contractor GTD CLS Performance Work Statement (Section J, Attachments 9, 10, and 11).

3.13 Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). The contractor shall determine whether their

LAS design includes any MTCR Category I & II items (http://www.mtcr.info/english/index.html). The results of this assessment will be provided to the Government in a technical report 90 days after contract award. (DI-MISC-80805B/T, A015).

3.14 Information Assurance (IA), Critical Program Information (CPI) and Anti-Tamper. The

LAS system shall be protected against compromising security requirements in accordance with

Certification and Accreditation (C&A), INFOSEC, EMSEC, COMSEC, OPSEC, COMPUSEC, Physical

Security, and Procedural Security. The contractor shall identify and document the applicable information assurance controls of DoDI 8500.2 (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/850002p.pdf) for the system. In addition, identify and document any critical program information and anti-tamper requirements and established protection measures. The results of this assessment will be provided to the

Government in a technical report. See also DOD 5200.1-R

(http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001r.pdf) and AFI 31-401

(http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/usaf/afi31-401.pdf). (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A015)

3.15 Flight Operations Manuals (FOM), Organizational-Level (O-Level) Maintenance

Manuals, Weapons Loading Manuals, and Checklists. The contractor shall provide the contractor’s engineering-approved FOMs, Manuals and Checklists with appropriate procedures for operating the LAS aircraft in an airworthy manner for both advanced pilot training and the combat air support missions

(including weapons carriage employment and accuracy information). The contractor shall provide

Weapons Loading Manuals for all weapons required to be integrated and certified for use on the LAS aircraft. The contractor shall provide commercial O-Level maintenance manuals with appropriate procedures to maintain the LAS aircraft in an airworthy and mission capable condition. The O-level procedures shall include transient and emergency servicing and response Checklists. The contractor shall http://www.mtcr.info/english/index.html http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/850002p.pdf http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001r.pdf http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/usaf/afi31-401.pdf

10 June 2011Page 12 of 16 develop and implement a process where the USG reviews and approves the FOM and aircraft and GTD

Operations and Maintenance manuals, including changes that occur throughout the contract. The change process for these manuals shall be compatible with existing FAA or equivalent processes and the weapon system change process described in paragraph 3.6 above. All manuals shall be provided in paper copies.

The contractor shall maintain the manuals in an electronic format for ease of maintenance and updates.

(DI-TMSS-80067B/T, A020)

3.16 Program Management. The contractor shall establish and implement a program management organization to manage all contractual and technical performance, including, as a minimum, subcontracts, finances, schedule, data, airworthiness certification, and ICS/CLS. As necessary, the Government will initiate, and the contractor will support, weekly teleconferences to provide updated status and resolve management and technical issues.

3.16.1 Program Management Reviews. The contractor shall participate in and host Program

Management Reviews (PMR) on a quarterly basis to present current status of detailed program activities.

Activities may include manufacturing, production, engineering, contract execution, or other relevant topics. It may be necessary to conduct contractor/USG TIMs before or soon after PMRs. The initial

PMR will occur within one month after contract award in conjunction with the first TIM and will be hosted by the contractor. Subsequent reviews may be conducted via video teleconference as requested by the contracting officer. Action items will be assigned during these PMRs and the contractor shall work to resolve all actions items as required and approved by the USG. Every three (3) months, PMRs will alternately be hosted by the Government and contractor at their facilities.

3.16.2 Contract Work Breakdown Structure. The contractor shall develop and deliver a Contract Work

Breakdown Structure (CWBS) for the LAS production program in accordance with MIL-HDBK-881A

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=202687). (DI-MGMT-81334, A021)

3.16.3 Integrated Master Plan; Integrated Master Schedule. The contractor shall manage the LAS program using the Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and the associated Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) as day-to-day execution tools and to periodically assess progress meeting program requirements. The contractor shall report on program progress in accordance with the IMP at each Program Management

Review. The IMS will be maintained to reflect and track to the IMP. Refer to Department of Defense

“Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule Preparation and Use Guide” as a guide

(http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/IMP_IMS_Guide_v9.pdf). The IMP and IMS shall be based on the

CWBS developed in accordance with paragraph 3.16.2 above. (DI-MGMT-81650, A022)

3.16.4 Administrative Support. The contractor shall develop agenda and minutes for all meetings, reviews, audits, etc. (DI-ADMN-81249A/T, A023, DI-ADMN-81250A, A024)

3.16.5 Operations Security (OPSEC). The contractor shall develop an Operations Security Plan to identify OPSEC security responsibilities and requirements; define overall OPSEC security standard practice procedures; identify potential problem areas and determine solutions; and develop OPSEC security awareness inputs into the overall system security process. (DI-MGMT-80934A/T, A031) https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=202687 http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/IMP_IMS_Guide_v9.pdf

10 June 2011Page 13 of 16

3.16.6 Import/Export Licenses. The contractor shall acquire the appropriate import and export licenses required to support manufacture and delivery of LAS aircraft/GTDs and performance of ICS/CLS to include delivery and repair of contractor owned aircraft spares and equipment.

3.16.7 [Reserved]

3.16.8 Contract Funds Status Report. The contractor shall prepare and submit a Contract Funds Status

Report (CFSR). (DI-MGMT-81468/T, A029)

3.17 Risk Management. The contractor shall develop and implement a Risk Management Plan that clearly defines how the Risk Definition and Risk Reduction will be managed and controlled. A task matrix keyed to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) shall be developed in sufficient detail to identify

Contractor and subcontractor responsibilities. Refer to “Risk Management Guide for DOD Acquisition” as a guide (http://www.dau.mil/pubs/gdbks/risk_management.asp). The initial submission shall be included in the proposal. (DI-MISC-80508B/T; A015; DI-MGMT-81808, A019)

3.18 Management Information. The contractor shall establish and host a capability to electronically communicate and exchange information and data. This shall include access control for those approved by both the contractor and the US Government program office. This capability shall be designed to easily incorporate additional capabilities as the program progresses.

3.19 Quality. The contractor shall maintain a quality system in accordance with Aerospace Basic

Quality System Standard 9100 (AS 9100C) for LAS aircraft and GTDs. The quality system shall ensure delivery of production units that comply with all technical requirements. The quality system shall ensure defect prevention and minimize product variability. The contractor’s quality system shall contain procedures that ensure the selection and control of suppliers providing products or services that meet contract requirements. The quality system will directly support the continuance of aircraft airworthiness and acceptance (DD250) process. The contractor shall deliver a Quality Management Plan. (DI-MISC-

80508B/T, A015)

3.20 Warranties. The contractor shall be responsible for correction of nonconformance in accordance with ASC/LAS-H027, Correction of Nonconformance (Aug 2010). (DI-MISC-80805B/T; A015)

3.21 Calibration. The contractor shall maintain a calibration system in accordance with ANSI/NCSL

Z540.3 2006 (http://www.qualitymag.com/Articles/Industry_Headlines/BNP_GUID_9-5-

2006_A_10000000000000389497). The calibration system shall control the accuracy of measuring and test equipment, and measurement standards, used to ensure that products delivered to the Government comply with the technical specifications and provide an airworthy aircraft. The calibration system shall prevent inaccuracy by ready detection of deficiencies and timely positive action for their correction.

3.22 Human Engineering. The contractor shall develop and implement a Human Engineering

Program (HEP) to ensure that appropriate studies are performed and that human engineering criteria are applied to subsystem hardware and computer software design as are relevant to the LAS design and production program. MIL-HDBK-46855A

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=201925) can be used as a guide.

http://www.dau.mil/pubs/gdbks/risk_management.asp http://www.qualitymag.com/Articles/Industry_Headlines/BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_10000000000000389497 http://www.qualitymag.com/Articles/Industry_Headlines/BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_10000000000000389497 https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=201925

10 June 2011Page 14 of 16

3.23 Air Advisor Training. The contractor shall conduct Air Advisor Training for pilots and maintenance personnel in accordance with the contractor Air Advisor Training PWS (Section J, Attachment 12, PWS for Air Advisor Pilot Training).

3.24 Aircraft and GTD Modifications. The contractor shall develop, test, implement, certify and document aircraft and GTD modifications utilizing the ECP process of the contract and as negotiated in response to changes in training, combat operations, country environment or interoperability of the aircraft.

While it is desired for modifications to be incorporated during aircraft production, the USG understands that may not always be possible; therefore, some modifications may be retrofits conducted by the contractor or with contractor support.

3.25 Item Unique Identification (IUID). The LAS program will not require UID for those programs specifically identified in the Delivery Order as supporting Contingency Operations. However, all LAS programs, unless otherwise identified by DO, will require UID compliance in accordance with

DFARS 252.211-7003 (http://farsite.hill.af.mil) and MIL-STD-130N

(https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=35521). Non recurring UID implementation costs will be funded on the initial DO SOO requiring UID compliance (or not specifically exempted). As such, the contractor shall price in the CLIN identified as Non Recurring Implementation of UID all non recurring costs to implement a LAS UID program for LAS aircraft and LAS unique systems including GTDs and Support Equipment. Each DO requiring UID compliance will also task the contractor to identify and mark mission critical and mission essential items costing less than $5000, and other items as determined by the USG in accordance with DFARS 252/211-7003 (c)(1)(ii) and (iii)

(referenced attachment to be defined in the DO) and any required equipment changes that will be subject to UID.

3.26 Reserved – Sustainment of LAS System and GTDs

Glossary

AD Airworthiness Directive

ASIP Aircraft Structural Integrity Program

BATD Basic Aviation Training Device

CBT Computer Based Training

CCP Contract Change Proposal

CFSR Contract Funds Status Report

CLIN Contract Line Item Number

CLS Contractor Logistics Support

CPI Critical Program Information

CSA Configuration Status Accounting

CWBS Contract Work Breakdown Structure

DMSMS Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages

DO Delivery Order

DOD Department of Defense http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=35521

10 June 2011Page 15 of 16

ECP Engineering Change Proposal

EO/IR Electro Optical and Infrared

ENSIP Engine Structural Integrity Program

ESOH Environmental Safety and Occupational Health

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAT First Article Test

FCA Functional Configuration Audit

FCF Functional Check Flight

FMC Fully Mission Capable

FOM Flight Operations Manual

FTD Flight Training Device

GTD Ground Training Device

HEP Human Engineering Program

HUD Heads Up Display

IA Information Assurance

IAW In Accordance With

ICS Interim Contractor Support

IFR Instrument Flight Rules

IMP Integrated Master Plan

IMS Integrated Master Schedule

ISAF International Security Assistance Forces

IUID Item Unique Identification

LAS Light Air Support

MESL Mission Essential Subsystem List

MRA Manufacturing Readiness Assessment

MRL Manufacturing Readiness Level

MTCR Missile Technology Control Regime

NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization

NMC Non-Mission Capable

NOR Notice of Revision

NRT Non-Reportable Time

O-Level Organizational Level

OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer

OPSEC Operations Security

PCA Physical Configuration Audit

PCOL Procuring Contracting Officer Letter

PMR Program Management Review

PWS Performance Work Statement

RFP Request for Proposal

SB Service Bulletin

SCN Specification Change Notice

SEMP Systems Engineering Management Plan

SOO Statement of Objectives

SOW Statement of Work

SRD System Requirements Document

T&M Time and Materials

TIM Technical Interchange Meeting

UID Unique Identification

10 June 2011Page 16 of 16

US United States

USAF United States Air Force

USG United States Government