PastPerfFACTSSheetRFPAttachment8Rev1.DOC
DOC document 62 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8530-08-R-21758
About this file
RFP Attachment 8 Rev 1 (FACTS Sheet)
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 54 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP ATTACHMENT 8
RFP NUMBER: FA8530-08-R-21758
Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”, REV 1
(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)
Request the offeror complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Section L, Clause L-900(2)(f)(i), Instructions to Offerors, of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits of number and recency of contracts. Offeror is requested to use the format below and provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in paragraph B, below.
A. OFFEROR: (Including: (1) Name (Company/Division), (2) Address, (3) CAGE Code)
B. PROGRAM TITLE
C. CONTRACT NUMBER: D/TO No.:
D. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:
E. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – PLEASE LIST ALL THAT APPLY (pricing arrangements i.e. Firm Fixed Price, T&M, etc)
F. CONTRACT VALUE:
1. Original contract dollar value and current dollar value:
2. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes to original contract dollar value:
3. If award fee contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last three years:
G. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT AS PRIME
1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to subcontractor management: addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to subcontractor management of the program identified in paragraph B. above.
2. This paragraph shall also include details to support the offeror’s record for subcontractor management (to include, but not limited to, how many subcontractor(s) were used on the contract, what percentage of work was completed by the subcontractor(s), what was total dollar amount paid to subcontractor(s), and whether subcontractor’s proposal was submitted in a timely manner that facilitated your proposal being submitted by the due date as stated in the request for proposal), timely delivery, technical quality, and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.
3. Discuss your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business
Concerns. That is, did you carry out the policy of the United States in the awarding of subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and woman-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? This is applicable to all offerors.
4. Address subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. If one was required, complete the following regarding subcontracting goals and status-to-date for effort identified in paragraph B. If goals were not met, please explain.
This is applicable to large business concerns only.
| Category |
| Goals |
| Achieved-to-Date |
Small Business
Small Disadvantaged Business
Women-Owned Small Business
HUBZone Small Business
Veteran-Owned Small Business
Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
HBCU/MI
5. Include relevant information concerning your compliance with subcontracting plan goals for small disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns, monetary targets for SDB participation
(FAR 52.219-24), and notifications submitted under FAR 52.219-25, Small
Disadvantaged Business Participation Program-Disadvantaged Status and Reporting.
PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.
H. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Original schedule and
2. Current schedule:
3. Estimate @ completion:
4. How many times has scheduled changed and what are/were the primary causes:
I. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for ensure that current information is provided for all individuals. Five attempts will be made to contact and interview point of contacts provided. If the Government is unsuccessful in contacting any point of contact on the effort the contract’s past performance will receive an Unknown Confidence Rating. )
| Name and Office Symbol |
| Phone Number |
| Email Address |
| 1. Procuring Contracting Officer |
| DSN & Comm |
| 2. Program Manager/Lead Engineer |
| DSN & Comm |
| 3. ACO, QAP, QAE, COTR, etc. |
| DSN & Comm |
J. Specify, by name, key individual(s) who managed subcontractor involvement in the program identified in paragraph B. above. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of subcontractor management on the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort. Include information on subcontractor management plans.
K. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique in connection with subcontractor management. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for managing subcontractors.
L. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects, and corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above based on subcontractor(s) management polices/procedures of the prime.
M. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports in connection to subcontractor management previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining “fixes” made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS Sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that the offeror’s performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror’s ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised) and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.
N. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B, above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes____ No_____. If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.
O. Complete the following regarding subcontractor relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This information is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS Sheet information.
| Category |
| Example |
| Fill-in for the Effort Identified in Para B. Above |
| 1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved |
| Development, Services, Repair |
| 2. Performance Location |
| Facility |
| 3. Contract Type |
| FFP, T&M, etc |
| 4. Extent of subcontractor involvement |
| Percentage of work performed |
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – See FAR 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY RFP
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .