RFP_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_05Nov18.pdf

RFP ATTACHMENT: 4

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 8

The AFLCMC/WLDK office of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a T-38 Pacer Classic III – Phase III & Talon Repair Inspection and Maintenance (TRIM) program. T-38 Program Office (PO) is focused on removing and replacing key fuselage structural components identified on T-38A/B/C aircraft historically exposed to the greatest fatigue damage.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 30 November 2018. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to russell.walter.1@us.af.mil, and casey.hodson@us.af.mil. Please call Russell Walter at 801-586- 0690, or Casey Hodson at 801-777-8416, if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Signature (Procuring Contracting Officer)

1 Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:russell.walter.1@us.af.mil mailto:casey.hodson@us.af.mil

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 8

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 8

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 8

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

T1. How would you rate this contractor’s ability to acquire and properly kit higher quantities of aircraft parts and assemblies of varying sizes and weights?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How would you rate this contractor’s ability to interpret 2D drawings and point-to-point loft data?

T3. How would you rate contractor’s ability to verify the accuracy of contractor-created 3D models?

T4. How would you rate the extent to which contractor’s products met the technical requirements (product quality)?

T5. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to identify part discrepancies and the speed of which corrective action was taken?

T6. How well did the contractor implement quality control processes?

T7. How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for sheet metal fabrication, complex machining, and application of corrosion protection?

T8. How well did the contractor manage Critical Safety Items and the associated requirements (i.e. products requiring added traceability, qualification, certification, inspection, etc)?

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 8

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness including timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor monitor the program schedules and critical milestones?

P4. How well did the contractor control and manage subcontractors?

P5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

P6. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P7. How would you rate contractor’s ability to maintain an experienced personnel base to support contract requirements throughout the performance period?

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 8

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P8. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

P9. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention / Attraction E V S M U N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 8

Employee Retention / Attraction E V S M U N/A

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation E V S M U N/A

S1. If the contract included FAR 52.219-9, to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-9 was not included in the contract)

S2. If the contract included FAR 52.219-8, how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-8 was not included in the contract)

Cost Performance E V S M U N/A

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

For Official Use Only Page 8 of 8

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

AFLCMC/WLDKA

ATTN: Russell Walter, and Casey Hodson 6072 Fir Ave. Building 1233 Hill AFB, UT 84056 or

E-Mail the completed form to:

russell.walter.1@us.af.mil casey.hodson@us.af.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:russell.walter.1@us.af.mil mailto:casey.hodson@us.af.mil