ITO_ATTACHMENT_1.2_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

DOC document 70 KB Posted

Attached to
Protective Coating/Paint Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8101-12-R-0009
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Tinker Air Force Base

About this file

Section L-ITO ATTACHMENT 1.2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Protective Coating/Paint, newest first.
File Type Posted
fa8101-12-r-0009-0004_amend.pdf PDF
Question-Answers__5_to_FBOcomplete21_Mar_13_84-88_thru.doc.docx DOCX document
PROTECTIVE_COATING_BID_SCHEDULE_REVISED_13_Mar_13.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA8101-12-R-0009_solicitation_final.pdf PDF
FA8101-12-R-0009-0003.pdf PDF
3rd_amendment_paint_IDIQ.doc DOC document
Amendment_1.doc DOC document
Prot_Coat_SOW_Rev_26_Feb_13.pdf PDF
Bid_Schedule_to_Paint_Ext_B1086_Seed_Project.pdf PDF
B-1086_Paint_Exterior_SOW_26_Feb_13_(2).pdf PDF
PROTECTIVE_COATING_BID_SCHEDULE_REVISED_26_FEB_13.xls XLS spreadsheet
Question-Answers__4_Complete_to_FBO_14Feb__13_-19_feb_13_82__-_83_thru_____.doc DOC document
Question-Answers_Complete__3_to_FBO_15_Feb_13_69_-_81_CE_Res.doc DOC document
Ques-Ans_complete__2_to_FBO_30_Jan_13_6Feb_thru_68_CE_Res_complete_.doc DOC document
Question-Answers__1_to_FBO_29_Jan_13_final.doc DOC document
00_70_00_dated_07_11.pdf PDF
Protective_Coating_SOW_14_Aug_12_(2).doc DOC document
EXHIBITS_A-E._BID_SCHEDULE.xls XLS spreadsheet
01_33_00_Submittal_Procedures_16_Feb_12.pdf PDF
DD_254.pdf PDF
AF_66_Submittals_for_Protective_Coating__26_Jul_12.pdf PDF
ITO_ATTACHMENT_1.5_SAMPLE_CLIENT_AUTHORIZATION_LETTER.doc DOC document
ITO_ATTACHMENT_1.3_SAMPLE_QUESTIONNAIRE_COVER_LETTER.doc DOC document
ITO_ATTACHMENT_2.0_PROPOSED_TEAM_LIST.doc DOC document
ITO_ATTACHMENT_1.1_PAST_AND_PRESENT_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION_SHEET.doc DOC document
Solicitation.doc DOC document
B-1086_Paint_Exterior_SOW.doc DOC document
ITO_ATTACHMENT_1.4_SAMPLE_CONSENT_LETTER.doc DOC document
00_71_00_dtd_07_11.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination_OK120080.mht MHT file
Section_M.doc DOC document
00_72_00_dtd_07_11.pdf PDF
Section_L_27_jun_2012.doc DOC document
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

PROTECTIVE COATING IDIQ, TINKER AFB, OK

ITO ATTACHMENT 1.2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

Section 1: Contractor References (To be filled out by the contractor and submitted with Past Performance Proposal).

Contractor’s name and address: _____________________________________________

1st Reference Point of Contact:_______________________________________________ Phone number (w/area code) _________________________________________________

Email address: ____________________________________________________________

Contract Number:__________________________________________________________

Project Title or Description of Work Performed:__________________________________

Contract Type: □Firm Fixed Price □ Cost Reimbursement □ Time & Material

Project Award Date: _________________ Sched Completion Date: __________________

Actual Completion Date: ___________________

Project Award Amount:_______________ Final Project Amount: ____________________

Contractor being evaluated performed as the: □ Prime □ Subcontractor

2nd Reference Point of Contact:______________________________________________ Phone number (w/area code) _________________________________________________

Email address: ____________________________________________________________

Contract Number:__________________________________________________________

Project Title or Description of Work Performed:__________________________________

Contract Type: □Firm Fixed Price □ Cost Reimbursement □ Time & Material

Project Award Date: _________________ Sched Completion Date: __________________

Actual Completion Date: ___________________

Project Award Amount:_______________ Final Project Amount: ____________________

Contractor being evaluated performed as the: □ Prime □ Subcontractor

3rd Reference Point of Contact:_______________________________________________ Phone number (w/area code) __________________________________________________

Email address: _____________________________________________________________

Contract Number:___________________________________________________________

Project Title or Description of Work Performed:___________________________________

Contract Type: □Firm Fixed Price □ Cost Reimbursement □ Time & Material

Project Award Date: _________________ Sched Completion Date: __________________

Actual Completion Date: ___________________

Project Award Amount:_______________ Final Project Amount: ____________________

Contractor being evaluated performed as the: □ Prime □ Subcontractor

SECTION 2: Respondent Information (To be sent to contractor provided references identified under section 1 by the AFSC/PZIOC. Once completed, respondent sends relevant pages to Contracting Office.)

Evaluated By:

(Signature) (Date) (Typed or Printed Name) (Address) (Title) (Address Continued) (Phone Number) (No. of years evaluator worked on contract)

SECTION 3: Performance Ratings (Project Title, Contract #, and Description)

SATISFACTORY (S)

(GREEN)

Performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed may contain some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M)

(YELLOW)

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractors proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U)

(RED)

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective.

UNKNOWN (UK)
Unknown Performance rating due to lack of sufficient information to assign a rating.

Evaluation Areas: Please circle a letter.

1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the Contractor.
S
M
U
UK

2. QUALITY:

A
Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements
S
M
U
UK
B
Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittal that matched contract requirements
S
M
U
UK
C
Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications
S
M
U
UK
D
Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan
S
M
U
UK

3. TIMELINESS:

A
Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time
S
M
U
UK
B
Contractor provided timely cost proposals
S
M
U
UK
C
Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required
S
M
U
UK
D
Contractor provided on time submittals as required
S
M
U
UK
E
Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractors employees as required
S
M
U
UK
F
Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items
S
M
U
UK

4. RESPONSIVENESS

A
Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations
S
M
U
UK
B
Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meeting as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay
S
M
U
UK
C
Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems and performed as a Team Member
S
M
U
UK
D
Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract
S
M
U
UK

5. SUBCONTRACTS AND MANAGEMENT:

A
Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements
S
M
U
UK
B
Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively
S
M
U
UK

6. CHANGE/COST CONTROL

A
Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals
S
M
U
UK
B
Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or modifications within the magnitude specified
S
M
U
UK
C
Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government
S
M
U
UK

SECTION 4: Narrative Summary

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

3. Please provide any additional comments concerning the contractor’s performance that you feel would help us in our evaluation.

4. Government Contracts Only. Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

______ Yes ________No

If Yes, please provide explanation__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Government Contracts Only: Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

______ Yes ________No

If Yes, please provide explanation__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

Department of the Air Force: AFSC/PZIOC

Attn: Sharla Brandon

7858 5th ST STE 1

Tinker AFB OK 73145-3020

E-mail (preferred: sharla.flowers-brandon@tinker.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .