Section L Attachments Version 2 18 Jun 09.doc
DOC document 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advisory & Assistance Services & Systems Engineering & Technical Assistance Services for Headquarters, Air Force Space Command Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2517-08-R-9000
About this file
Section L Attachments
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Advisory & Assistance Services & Systems Engineering & Technical Assistance Services for Headquarters, Air Force Space Command has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 8
Attachment L-1
Table of Contents for Section L Attachments
| Attachment Number |
| Description |
| Number of Pages |
| L-2 |
| Performance Work Statements for MILSATCOM Task Order |
| 27 |
| L-3 |
| Performance Work Statements for MW/MD Task Order |
| 25 |
| L-4 |
| Client Authorization Letter |
| 1 |
| L-5 |
| Team Relevancy Matrix |
| 4 |
| L-6 |
| Past Performance Information |
| 2 |
| L-7 |
| Consent Letter |
| 1 |
| L-8 |
| Past Performance Questionnaire Information |
| 3 |
| L-9 |
| Past Performance Questionnaire |
| 5 |
| L-10 |
| Questionnaire Cover Letter |
| 1 |
| L-11 |
| Position Description Format |
| 1 |
| L-12 |
| Staff Table Format |
| 1 |
Attachment L-2 and L-3 MILSATCOM AND MW/MD Task Orders Instructions: Offerors shall propose total cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF). Include pricing for a basic year and four option years. Do not include travel or ODC costs in your proposal. These amounts would be determined by the Government, and those costs would be reimbursable to the Contractor. However, any applicable indirect costs or burdens for travel and ODCs should be identified. No profit or fee is allowed on travel, material, or other direct costs.
Attachment L-4 Client Authorization Letter
NOTICE TO OFFERORS: To assist the Government’s Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing past performance on relevant contracts, the following letter must be transmitted to points of contact (POCs) for those efforts identified to the Government in the past performance volume. Should the proposal contain subcontractors, team members and/or joint venture partners, a similar client authorization letter must be obtained from these first tier subcontractors/team members/partners. The Offeror is solely responsible for transmittal of these authorization letters with questionnaires to the Offeror’s first tier subcontractors/team members and/or partners’ POCs.
SAMPLE PAST PERFORMANCE TRANSMITTAL LETTER FOR CONTRACTS
CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
(To be Accomplished by Offeror)
Dear (Client)
(Name of offeror’s company) is currently responding to a request for proposal (RFP) FA2517-08-R-9000 issued by the 21st Contracting Squadron, Peterson AFB CO for the acquisition of the Contract for Space and Missile Capabilities (CSMC) Advisory and Assistance Services. The Government requests clients of companies submitting proposals in response to the request for proposal be contacted and their participation in the validation process be requested. We, therefore, respectfully request and hereby authorize you to complete the attached questionnaire with regard to work (name of offeror’s company) has performed for you. Please forward the attached questionnaire directly to the Government point of contact via e-mail to:
peterson.csmc.ex@peterson.af.mil or via FAX to 719-556-7900 to the attention of Jeane Steed.
(Name of offeror’s company) has identified ____________________ (POC) of your organization as the point of contact based on their knowledge concerning our work. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Any questions may be directed to (Name, phone, fax number/e-mail for the undersigned).
Sincerely, (Offeror’s POC)
Attachment L-5 Team Relevancy Matrix
Note: “Relevant” means sufficiently similar to this acquisition to provide indicators of expected performance. Only identify subcontractors/team members past performance in areas in which subcontractors/team members are proposing to provide support on this contract. Offerors shall address relevancy in narrative in Volume IV, Past Performance. Offerors shall only submit the information requested on the Team Relevancy Matrix (Citation#, Page# and Paragraph#). Any additional narrative will not be evaluated.
TEAM RELEVANCY MATRIX INSTRUCTIONS:
The offeror’s assessment of relevancy shall be summarized for each Past Performance citation in Volume IV. The following Team Relevancy Matrix shall be completed with names of the prime and subcontractors on their team (i.e. their team members) providing support for each of the Mission Capability Areas and Directorates not covered under a Mission Capability. In each appropriate column, list the citation number, page number (Page #), and paragraph number (Paragraph #) of citations provided for past performance provided in Volume IV, with at least the minimums referenced by Section L, paragraph L-8B. The Government will consider each citation in accordance with the relevancy criteria in Section M, Paragraph M-5B. Offerors shall place “N/A” in the appropriate column if they determine there are no team members whose past performance is relevant for a particular Mission Capability Area or Directorate not covered under a Mission Capability. The Government is not bound by the offeror’s assessment of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided by the offeror or obtained from other sources. The PCAG team may also enter additional data if available from other sources.
TEAM RELEVANCY MATRIX
| Contractor |
| Contractor |
| Contractor |
| Contractor |
| PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, BUDGETING & EXECUTION (PPBE) & PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| ACQUISITION PROCESS & PROGRAM LIFE CYCLE |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| TRAINING, TEST, EXERCISES & EVALUATION |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS/COMMAND & CONTROL |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| NUCLEAR DETERENCE & STRIKE |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| POSITION, NAVIGATION & TIMING |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| LAUNCH, RANGE & NETWORKS |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| DATABASE MANAGMENT |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| MODELING & SIMULATION |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
| CYBER/NETCENTRIC |
| Citation # |
Page #
Paragraph# Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph # Citation #
Page #
Paragraph#
Attachment L-6 Past Performance Citation Information
Provide the information requested in this Past Performance Citation form for each citation. Offerors shall use the Past Performance Citation format shown below. The Offeror shall give each citation a Past Performance Citation Number and list it in the appropriate space at the top of each citation. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on each of the examples you identified. Provide a completed form for each example submitted. Provide the number of Past Performance Citations submitted as set forth in paragraph L-8B.
Past Performance Citation No.
Offeror Name (Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
DUNS No.:
Address:
Program Title:
Contract Number:
| Contract Type(s): |
| List all that apply |
Contracting Agency/Customer:
Period of Performance:
| Contract Value: |
| Exclude unexercised options |
| Ceiling: |
Original:
Current:
Reason for Change(s) in Value:
| Completion Date: |
| Original: |
Current:
Estimate at Completion ($):
Number and Reason for Change(s) in Schedule:
Points of Contact:
| Program Manager/QAE |
| Contracting Officer |
| Admin Contracting Officer |
Name:
Office:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
Other
(Please specify)
Name:
Office:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
Description of Effort:
Joint Venture Partners shall specifically identify the managing partner and other partners. Subcontractor/Teaming Partner shall identify Prime Contractor.
The narrative description shall explain what aspects of the example are deemed relevant to this solicitation by highlighting those portions of the example meeting the definitions of very relevant, relevant, somewhat relevant or not relevant in paragraph M-5B. Completion of the Team Relevancy Matrix will supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph.
The narrative description should include the following:
· General Description of Program and Project.
· Achievement of Small Business Goals (if there was a Subcontracting Plan).
· Technical Performance.
· Quality program or effort.
· Security requirements and any security problems of violations, if applicable.
· Performance incentives and/or award fee earned vs. total award fee pool
· Management Program in achieving program goals and schedules
· Cost performance including any underruns or overruns, cost incentives earned or lost, etc.
The narrative description shall describe major program risks for the Past Performance example. For program risks that resulted in problems, describe how the problems were identified and solved, measures taken to prevent problem recurrence, and management indicators that clearly support the problem was solved. For major program risks that did not result in problems, describe how proactive risk management techniques prevented problems. Program risks are defined as potential negative program events, and problems are defined as actual negative program events. Providing Past Performance efforts where many program risks resulted in problems is not considered an uncertainty unless the Offeror did not demonstrate the ability to overcome the problems encountered.
Attachment L-7 Consent Letter
Joint Venture Partner/Subcontractor Teaming Partner Consent Form for the Release of Past Performance Information to the Prime Contractor.
Past Performance Information concerning joint venture partners and subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming joint venture partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/joint venture/teaming partner Past Performance Information to the prime during discussions. In an effort to assist the Government’s Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your Past Performance relevancy and confidence, we request the following consent form be completed by the joint venture partners/major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.
SAMPLE:
Dear Ms. Steed, We are currently participating as a (joint venture partner/subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Contract for Space and Missile Capabilities (CSMC) for Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), Request for Proposal Solicitation No. FA2517-08-R-9000.
We understand the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss our past performance information with the Prime Contractor during the source selection process.
(Signature and title of individual possessing the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)
Company Name:
Address:
Attachment L-8
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INFORMATION
SECTION A: Offerors are reminded to provide a minimum of five references for the prime and a minimum of two references for each subcontractor/team member not to exceed the page limits set in Table L-3 for Volume IV.
Offeror please complete the following information:
Contract Number:
Contractor:
Questionnaire Respondent please complete the following:
Type of Contract (Circle One): CPFF CPIF CPAF T&M FFP LH
Security Clearance Required (Circle): Secret TS TS/SCI SAP/SAR
Total Task Order/Contract Award Amount: ____________________________________________
Current Task Order/Contract Value: __________________________________________________
Status:
Active Completed:________
Period of Performance & Date of Award: _______________________________________________
Contract Completion Date (Including Extensions): _______________________________________
Product Description and/or service provided:
*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS*****
SECTION B: EVALUATOR INFORMATION
Please provide the following for this survey:
Name:______________________________________________________________________
Office Identifier:_____________________________________________________________
Telephone Number:___________________________________________________________
Mailing Address:_____________________________________________________________
E-Mail Address:______________________________________________________________
Relation to Contract:__________________________________________________________
Name:______________________________________________________________________
Office Identifier:_____________________________________________________________
Telephone Number:___________________________________________________________
Mailing AddressAddress:_______________________________________________________
E-Mail Address:______________________________________________________________
Relation to Contract:__________________________________________________________
L-10
Questionnaire Cover Letter
MEMORANDUM FOR QUESTIONNAIRE POCs
FROM: 21CONS/LGCCB, Suite 1240 Bldg. 350
135 Dover St.
Peterson Air Force Base, CO 80914 SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information
1. Headquarters Air Force Space Command (HQ AFSPC) is in the process of selecting contractors for the Contract for Space and Missile Capabilities (CSMC), RFP #FA2517-08-R-9000. The estimated value of this acquisition is $450 million over the life of the 5-year contract. Detailed information regarding this solicitation may be found at http://www.fedbizops.gov.
2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offeror’s past performance on contracts which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.
3. Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the attached questionnaire. We need your written response by hours, local Colorado time on . This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of discussions. It is important that you return the completed questionnaire directly to the Government. We may also contact you for further information if required.
4. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and e-mailed to: peterson.csmc.ex@peterson.af.mil or faxed to (719) 556-7900 to the attention of Jeane Steed. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.
5. We greatly appreciate your assistance. Your prompt response is important to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.
--signed--
JEANE E. STEED
Contracting Officer
Atch: Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .