9000-0004.doc

HQ AFSPC

CONTRACT INFORMATION

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND ICBM AND HELICOPTER OPERATIONS DIVISION (HQ AFSPC/XON) MCCC OPERATIONS SUPPORT

1050 North Newport Rd

Colorado Springs, CO 80916-2742

(Base Plus 2 Option Years)

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND

ICBM AND HELICOPTER OPERATIONS DIVISION

(HQ AFSPC/XON) MCCC OPERATIONS SUPPORT

9000-0004 XX Dec 04

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES. The United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) Mobile Consolidated Command Center (MCCC) is one of two MCCCs to provide a survivable, endurable command and control node. The former USSPACECOM MCCC has been re-designated the USNORTHCOM MCCC. In addition, United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) is leading an effort, the Combatant Commanders Integrated Command and Control System (CCIC2 S), (formerly called the NORAD/USSPACECOM Warfighting Support System (N/UWSS)). This effort will modernize both fixed and endurable nodes in support of Commander USNORTHCOM and Commander USSTRATCOM. The CCIC2S business process reengineering (BPR) effort continues. In addition, USNORTHCOM could initiate a BPR effort to identify transformation capabilities for the new Unified Command. This task order continues ongoing work previously accomplished under Encore Task Order 0011 activities. This prior task order effected the CCIC2S BPR modernization, integrating the modernization into the existing MCCC system engineering, requirements analysis, configuration management, Battlestaff training, and security engineering efforts to facilitate identification of MCCC legacy systems and migration systems. This task order continues the CCIC2S accomplished under Task Orders 0011 supporting the CCIC2S efforts to complete BPR effort to modernize the USSTRATCOM and USNORTHCOM fixed and endurable command and control centers into an evolutionary development compliant with a Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) Common Operating Environment (COE) architecture meeting the Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management (TAFIM) standard.

1.1 ORGANIZATION BEING SUPPORTED:

HQ AFSPC/XONN

150 Vandenberg Street Suite 1105

Peterson AFB CO 80914-4180

1.2 OVERVIEW OF SERVICES REQUIRED. In general, XONN requires technical support for MCCC classified operations, planning, budgeting, requirements development and justification, configuration control, analysis, studies, and program reviews supporting ground mobile, survivable integration of systems. The contractor provides a broad range of research, technical advice and analytical reports, planning, studies, cost and feasibility analyses, decision support, quick response support, and planning for current and future training scenario generation and exercise support to USNORTHCOM. Additionally, they interface on operational matters at the classified level with USNORTHCOM, CJCS, Air Staff, SPO and the Operational unit. The MCCC integrates existing communications and automated data processing systems and capabilities into a mobile, survivable command and control center. These systems include - but are not limited to - Milstar, Global Command and Control System (GCCS), Defense Message System (DMS), Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS), Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF), Nuclear Planning and Execution System (NPES), Intelligence systems, Defense Automated Warning System (DAWS) Messaging Front End (DMFE), and Ground Nuclear Detonation (NUDET) Detection System (NDS) Terminal (GNT).

1.3 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. The Contractor shall assist the Nuclear Operations Branch (HQ AFSPC/XONN) by providing technical analysis and engineering support for NORTHCOM MCCC programs/operations, will interface with other National, Civil, and DoD entities an provide assistance in solving problematic issues and concerns experienced by the management and operational communities,

2. Task Order Title. USNORTHCOM MCCC Integration Support

3. Objectives. This task order supports the USNORTHCOM/J3C objectives of migrating the current MCCC to DII COE architecture meeting the TAFIM standard. In addition, the USNORTHCOM/J3C effort will integrate DII COE compliant systems including Global Command and Control System (GCCS, secret and top secret), Defense Messaging System (DMS), and Defense Red Switch Network (DRSN) into the MCCC. The CCIC2S goals of flexibility, interoperability, and reduced cost of ownership for both the USNORTHCOM/USSTRATCOM fixed and endurable command and control nodes complies with Department of Defense goals of integrated and interoperable systems. The contractor shall furnish USNORTHCOM/J3C technical solutions including integration solutions management, business process reengineering, requirements analysis, standard/ common/migration application development, product integration, and deployment operations and maintenance including configuration management and training in support of the CCIC2S and MCCC programs.

4. Scope. The contractor shall comply with the appropriate DoD-approved architectures, programs, standards and guidelines, such as DII Strategic Technical Guidance (STG), DII COE, Defense Information Systems Network (DISN) and Shared Data Environment (SHADE). Specific services addressed in this SOW are

· Task Area 1 - Enterprise IT Policy and Planning

· Task Area 2 - Integrated Solutions Management

· Task Area 4 - Business Process Reengineering

· Task Area 5 - Requirements Analysis

· Task Area 7 - Information and Knowledge Engineering

· Task Area 8 - Custom Application Development

· Task Area 9 - Product Integration

· Task Area 10 - Test and Evaluation

5. Specific Tasks. This task order provides management and technical support in five task areas. The first task area provides Contract Level and Task Order Management, including quality assurance, security management, cost monitoring, and performance requirements. The CCIC2S Engineering and Integration Support task provides CCIC2S integration management and MCCC integration strategies. The MCCC Engineering and Integration Support task will review, analyze, and evaluate design activities for compliance with identified standards/common/migration applications. The Operational Support task will provide MCCC training and requirements and configuration control support. The USNORTHCOM MCCC Transformation task provides analysis and documentation of USNORTHCOM legacy and transformation capabilities.

5.1 Task 1 - Enterprise Management Controls.

5.1.1 Subtask 1 - Integration Management Control Planning. Provide the technical and functional activities at the contract level needed for the program management of this SOW. Include productivity and management methods such as quality assurance, configuration management, work breakdown structuring and human engineering at the contract level. Provide the centralized administrative, clerical, documentation and related functions.

5.1.2 Subtask 2 - TO Management. Prepare a TO Management Plan describing the technical approach, organizational resources and management controls to be employed to meet the cost, performance and schedule requirements throughout TO execution. Provide a monthly status report monitoring the quality assurance, configuration management, and security management applied to the TO.

Deliverables:

Task Order Management Plan Monthly Status Report

5.2 Task 2 - CCIC2S Integration Solutions Management. The CCIC2S Engineering and Integration Support task includes technical support for the research, analysis, recommendation, and documentation of CCIC2S and MCCC integration issues and approaches.

5.2.1 Subtask 1 - CCIC2S Integration Management. This subtask area recommends opportunities for resolving issues in MCCC requirements, data, applications and infrastructure elements. This subtask also includes planning, analyzing, and reporting MCCC programmatic impacts on the issues such as costs, return on investment, schedule dependencies, and recommending functional solutions. In addition, this subtask examines functional, management and technical issues to provide effective solutions for the CCIC2S integration efforts. Documentation will be developed for studies, analyses, assessments and system architectures.

Deliverables:

CCIC2S Architecture Impact on MCCC

5.3 Task 3 - MCCC Application Development. The MCCC Engineering and Integration Support task includes technical support that supplements the design activities; provides documentation and technical reviews; and provides support services for all aspects of deploying approved standard/common/migration applications/systems.

5.3.1 Subtask 1 - MCCC Integration Strategies. This subtask will produce integration strategies to reduce the large number of MCCC legacy systems to a more manageable, cost effective, standard number of applications as AFSPC transitions to its target information architecture supporting interoperability and cross-functional data sharing. In addition, the integration strategies will examine all aspects of change to the MCCC organization resulting from functional process improvements and the selection of standard/ common/migration applications. The MCCC integration strategy will consider all integration management components in order to recommend a standard/common/migration system, provide cost and economic analyses supporting the migration strategy, identify and evaluate risks inherent with the proposed strategy, and provide a tentative implementation plan.

5.3.2 Subtask 2 - Standard/Common/Migration Application Development. This subtask will evaluate standard/common/migration systems for incorporation into the MCCC. This subtask provides technical support in areas that supplement the design stage activities. This subtask includes analysis and evaluation of existing government DII COE applications and commercial off-the-shelf applications; review and evaluation of planned application development and security engineering; and attendance at design sessions for evaluation of designs to meet standard/common/migration applications.

5.3.3 Subtask 3 - Documentation Reviews. This subtask includes attendance at design walkthroughs and meetings where development documentation is discussed. In addition, this subtask shall provide identification of design issues and questions, responses to management concerns, and any supporting information where required.

5.3.4 Subtask 4 - MCCC Integration of GCCS, DMS and DRSN. This subtask will evaluate DII COE compliant Global Command and Control System (GCCS), Defense Messaging Service (DMS), and Defense Red Switch Network (DRSN) integration into the MCCC. In addition, this subtask shall provide identification of integration and operations design issues and questions, responses to management concerns and any supporting information where required.

Deliverables:

MCCC Migration Strategy

5.4 Task 4 - MCCC Product Integration and Requirements Analysis. The MCCC Operational Support task includes training support services and requirements identification support services.

5.4.1 Subtask 1 - MCCC Training. This subtask provides MCCC training support services for all levels of MCCC information system operators, maintainers, and users. This subtask includes development of alternative training scenarios; development of appropriate training approaches to include MCCC exercises; preparation of training plans; development of training curricula and materials for MCCC information systems operators and users; preparation of materials and schedules; and administration and conduct of training sessions at in-garrison and deployed sites.

5.4.2 Subtask 2 - Requirements Identification Support. This subtask provides MCCC requirements identification support to include analyzing, tracking and reporting requirements and change requests. In addition, this subtask maintains the prioritized list of MCCC upgrades and funding status. This subtask also provides configuration control support services to assist the customer in Requirements Review Board preparation, to include maintaining copies of change requests.

Deliverables:

MCCC Training Scenarios MCCC Requirements Review Board Minutes

5.5 Task 5 - USNORTHCOM MCCC Transformation. The USNORTHCOM MCCC Transformation task provides analysis and documentation of USNORTHCOM legacy and transformation capabilities. This task incorporates the USNORTHCOM capabilities transformation effort to define the future USNORTHCOM MCCC capabilities.

5.5.1 Subtask 1 - USNORTHCOM MCCC Communications and Data Processing Analysis. This subtask evaluates current MCCC communications and data processing capabilities to enhance the USNORTHCOM MCCC transformation to homeland security and defense. The reengineered MCCC communications and data processing capabilities will meet the USNORTHCOM operational challenges of the 21st Century. Analysis will be performed to determine transformation of communications and data processing capabilities to meet USNORTHCOM requirements.

5.5.2 Subtask 2 - USNORTHCOM MCCC Operational Analysis. This subtask evaluates current MCCC operations to enhance the USNORTHCOM MCCC transformation to homeland security and defense. The redefined MCCC operations will meet the USNORTHCOM operational needs of the 21st Century. Analysis will be performed to determine transformation of operations to meet USNORTHCOM requirements.

Deliverables:

USNORTHCOM MCCC Transformational Analysis

6. Place of Performance. The task order will be performed at the Government and contractor sites. One contractor person will be based in their own facility and will provide part-time task order management support. Three contractor personnel will be based at Government facilities and will travel to other Government and Contractor facilities for data gathering, meetings, training, and management reviews. For the three contractor personnel based at the Government facility, the Government will provide workspace, access to Government safes, access to a telephone, and access to a computer in the performance of task order assignments. The contractor will require local travel between the contractor facilities and Government facilities located in the Colorado Springs area. Twenty-eight long distance trips will be required to the following locations for the meetings specified - Cheyenne, WY (16) for modernization testing and in-garrison exercises; Albuquerque, NM (6) for Program Management Reviews (PMR), Modernization Implementation Product Team (IPT) reviews and Logistics Support Facility reviews; Washington, DC (3) for SMCC Conference and PMR; and Omaha, NE (4) for PMR, Operational Requirements Meeting, and Exercise Requirements Meetings. Duration of the long distance trips will be five days or less.

7. Period of Performance. The period of performance is 365 calendar days (15 Jan 2004 - 13 Jan 2005).

8. Delivery Schedule. The following table describes the items to be delivered for each task in Section 5, data item description (DID) format for each deliverable, the distribution number and receiving organizations, and the delivery dates either after task order award or determined by specific task order events.

9. Security. Work to be performed under this task order requires TOP SECRET/Single Integrated Operations Plan/Extremely Sensitive Information (TS/SIOP/ESI) and TOP SECRET/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) clearances. Also see attached DD Form 254.

10. Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE)/Government-Furnished Information (GFI). The following list contains GFI documentation required by the contractor in the performance of this task order.

Survivable Mobile Command Center Conference Review

Concept of Operations for the AFSPC Mobile Command and Control System, Jun 99

Configuration Management Plan for the MCCC

Mobile Command and Control System Operations Requirements Document, Nov 90

11. Other Pertinent Information or Special Considerations. Government will furnish TS/SCI billets for contractor personnel. The Contractor will require access to Government facilities within the Colorado Springs area including Peterson AFB, Schriever AFB, Cheyenne Mountain Air Station and Fort Carson. The contractor will also require access to Government facilities outside the Colorado Springs area including FE Warren AFB, WY ANG facilities in Cheyenne, and other sites necessary to perform the tasks outlined in this statement of work. Government furnished information required by the contractor includes, but is not limited to, CCIC2S, DMS, GCCS, SBIRS, GBS and MCCC system and operations documents.

a. Government-Owned Vehicles (GOVs). The Government may authorize the contractor to use GOVs or Government billeting when it is advantageous to the Government.

b. Funding Plans. The Government may authorize the contractor access to funding documents (Fin Plans, POMs, etc.) for the MCCS and other related systems for which the contractor is doing analysis work to develop funding plans and submissions.

c. Program Familiarization. Contractor personnel familiarization with NORAD/USNORTHCOM, USSTRATCOM, ACC and AFSPC organizations and operations is required. In addition, familiarization with ground mobile command and control system operations, support, sustainment and maintenance is required.

d. Identification of Possible Follow-on Work. This task order potentially leads to follow-on CCIC2S and MCCC engineering and integration support to complete the migration from legacy systems to a DII COE based evolutionary system.

e. Identification of Potential Conflicts of Interest (COI). The contractor will be performing BPR tasking for the USSTRATCOM CCIC2S program and integration and operations tasking for the AFSPC MCCS program. The AFMC Integrated Space Command and Control (ISC2) contract will perform research and develop tasking to produce DII COE products. No COI exists between the CCIC2S and USNORTHCOM MCCC Integration Support and the ISC2 contract.

f. Identification of Non-Disclosure Requirements. The contractor will be required to assist in MCCC funding activities including POM/APOM/FinPlan. A non-disclosure agreement will be maintained by the contractor.

g. Packaging, Packing and Shipping Instructions. None.

h. Inspection and Acceptance Criteria. None.

12. Section 508 Accessibility Standards. The following Section 508 Accessibility Standard(s) (Technical Standards and Functional Performance Criteria) are applicable (if box is checked) to this acquisition.

Technical Standards

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.21 - Software Applications and Operating Systems

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.22 - Web Based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.23 - Telecommunications Products

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.24 - Video and Multimedia Products

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.25 - Self-Contained, Closed Products

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.26 - Desktop and Portable Computers

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.41 - Information, Documentation and Support

The Technical Standards above facilitate the assurance that the maximum technical standards are provided to the Offerors. Functional Performance Criteria is the minimally acceptable standards to ensure Section 508 compliance. This block is checked to ensure that the minimally acceptable electronic and information technology (E&IT) products are proposed.

Functional Performance Criteria

FORMCHECKBOX

1194.31 - Functional Performance Criteria

Section I - Contract Clauses

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

Accounting and Appropriation Data

CLIN/SubCLIN Purchase Request Number Obligated Amount

NMIPR044600330

$325,490.20

NMIPR044600353

$127,450.80

TOTAL TASK ORDER AMOUNT

$452,941.00 DITCO Points of Contact Contracting Officer Name: Mark Schneider

Organization: DISA/DITCO-Scott (AQSS32)

Phone No.: (618) 229-9132; DSN 779-9132

E-Mail: schneidm@scott.disa.mil Contract Specialist Name: Darlene Cutler

Organization: DISA/DITCO-Scott (AQSS32)

Phone No.: (618) 229-9697; DSN 779-9697

E-Mail: cutlerd@scott.disa.mil Contractor Point of Contact Contractor Name: Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC)

DUNS: 043991108

CAGE Code: 52939

Contractor POC: Bill Cox

Email Address: bcox@csc.com Phone Number: (618) 622-4709

Fax Number: (618) 624-5848

Electronic invoices may be sent to:

invoicereceipt@scott.disa.mil Questions regarding invoices may be directed to (618) 229-9228. Vendors may check the status of invoices at the following web site:

http://www.dfas.mil/money/vendor

CREDIT CARD METHOD OF PAYMENT

If payment is to be made via credit card, contact the Contracting Officer listed above.

DRAFT