F16_BCSR_TRDSOW_20201028_RevA.pdf
PDF 261 KB Posted
- Attached to
- F-16 Brake Control System Redesign (BCSR) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SPRHA1-21-R-7000
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
About this file
This technical requirements document and statement of work outlines the key requirements and deliverables for the F-16 Brake Control System Redesign program. The supplier will be responsible for developing new BACU, BCV and wiring harness configurations to meet the performance specification. Major deliverables include an integrated master schedule, status reports, design reviews, qualification testing, tooling and fixtures, technical orders, logistics data, and initial investment spare parts. The supplier must also provide engineering support and retrofit assistance through the duration of the program, with final deliverables due 47 months after receipt of order. Qualification testing is required to demonstrate compliance with requirements prior to the vendor airworthiness certification report and delivery of flight test articles 30 months after receipt of order.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
F-16 Brake Control System Redesign (BCSR) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (TRD)
– STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
U.S. Air Force (USAF)
F-16 Brake Control System Redesign (BCSR) Program
28 October 2020 – Revision A
Prepared by
Air Force Sustainment Center (417 SCMS)
Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PURPOSE/SCOPE
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Scope
2.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
2.1 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and Supplier Status Reports (SSRs) ... 3
2.2 Supplier Performance Review Board (SPRB) Meetings
2.3 Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs)
2.4 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
2.5 Critical Design Review (CDR)
2.6 F-16 BCSR Configuration Management
2.6.1 Quality Assurance 5
2.6.2 Hardware Configuration 5
2.6.3 Tooling, Fixtures, and Inspection Equipment 5
2.6.4 Implementation/Troubleshooting Support 6
3.0 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
3.1 Performance Specification (PS)
3.2 Qualification Test Plan (QTP)
3.3 Test Readiness Review (TRR)
3.4 Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
3.5 Antiskid System Performance Evaluation Articles
3.6 Pre-CDR Fit Check Support/Articles
3.7 Post-CDR Fit Check Support/Articles
3.8 Flight Test Support/Articles/Spares
3.9 Vendor Airworthiness Certification Report (VACR)
3.10 Qualification Test Report (QTR)
3.11 Technical Data Package (TDP)
4.0 TECHNICAL ORDERS (TOS)
4.1 Aircraft TO Source Data
4.2 Commodity TO Source Data
4.2.1 Repair - Brake and Antiskid Control Unit (BACU) 10
4.2.2 Repair - Brake Control Valve (BCV) 10
4.3 TO Formatting
4.4 TO Requirement Conferences (TORCs)
4.5 Commodity TO Validation/Verification
5.0 LOGISTICS
5.1 Spare Parts Packages
5.2 Spares Requirement Conferences (SRCs)
5.3 Logistics Management Information (LMI)
5.4 Initial Investment Spare Parts
1.0 PURPOSE/SCOPE
1.1 Purpose
This TRD shall become the Supplier’s SOW for the F-16 BCSR contract and defines contractual obligations for which the Supplier shall be responsible if awarded.
1.2 Scope
This document lists the Supplier’s major program milestone schedule, hardware, data, and support requirements for the F-16 BCSR Program. For reference, a shipset is considered one each of the Brake Antiskid Control Unit (BACU), Brake Control Valve (BCV) and wiring harness.
2.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
2.1 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and Supplier Status Reports (SSRs)
The Supplier shall deliver a comprehensive IMS as an appendix to the proposal. It shall contain all critical events, milestones, completion criteria, predecessors, successors, and their dependencies while providing clear evidence of the Supplier’s understanding of all program objectives, major milestone, and schedule requirements. The IMS shall facilitate critical path analysis. Following award, the Supplier shall maintain and provide monthly updates/revisions to the IMS (changes clearly identified) throughout the duration of the program, including the retrofit phase. The Supplier shall not revise contractual deliverable/milestone dates without Government approval (Reference DID DI-MGMT-81650, CDRL A001). The following event schedule is provided to clarify the Government’s required critical milestones necessary for meeting the overall program schedule.
The Supplier shall deliver a detailed SSR no more than one month After Receipt of Order (ARO) and every month thereafter throughout the duration of the program. The SSR shall summarize current activities, document progress toward upcoming milestones, provide an updated IMS, identify problems/concerns, and outline mitigations/solutions as necessary (Reference DID DI-MGMT-81928, CDRL A017).
2.2 Supplier Performance Review Board (SPRB) Meetings
The Supplier shall attend and facilitate SPRB meetings. The initial meeting shall serve as a System Requirements Review (SRR) and shall be conducted no later than two months ARO. Subsequent meetings shall be called on an as-needed basis and hosted by the Government and shall be conducted at locations designated by the Government (which may or may not include the Supplier’s facility). The Supplier shall provide agenda/data inputs to support these meetings. The meetings shall support review of the IMS and the Supplier’s strategy to comply with all contractual requirements (Reference DID DI-SESS-81766, CDRL A002 and DID DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003).
2.3 Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs)
The Supplier shall support TIMs via teleconferencing or at locations as determined by the Government. These meetings will be conducted monthly (schedule to be determined after contract award) and chaired by the Government for the purpose of reviewing overall program and technical progress. Meeting frequency may be increased to bi-weekly as determined necessary by the Government during critical periods of the program such as qualification testing, if schedule milestones are at increased risk for delay, or if problems arise. The Supplier shall provide agenda inputs/data to support these meetings. Required actions, many of which will be the responsibility of the Supplier, will be identified and documented by the Government in meeting minutes and action lists (Reference DID DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003).
2.4 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
The Supplier shall host a PDR at the Supplier’s facility or at a location designated by the Government. The PDR meeting shall be completed no later than nine months ARO. The Supplier shall deliver pre-PDR data and briefing materials no later than 15 calendar days prior to the meeting to enable Government review/preparation. The PDR shall provide the Government with an opportunity to consider design concepts/options and establish which configuration(s) should be subjected to development testing/analyses.
Additionally, the PDR will enable the Supplier and the Government to coordinate on program issues and contract requirements. The Supplier shall provide agenda inputs to support a combined Government/Supplier agenda (Reference DID DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003 and DID DI-SESS-81766, CDRL A006).
2.5 Critical Design Review (CDR)
The Supplier shall host a CDR at the Supplier’s facility or at a location designated by the Government. The CDR shall be completed no later than 16 months ARO. The Supplier shall deliver pre-CDR data and briefing materials no later than 15 calendar days prior to the meeting to enable Government review/preparation. The CDR shall provide the Government with an opportunity to evaluate/approve the Supplier’s final design based on testing and analyses. The Supplier is required to present its strength and fatigue analysis, interference and tolerance analysis, and electromagnetic interference analysis.
Additionally, the CDR will enable the Supplier and the Government to coordinate on program issues and contract requirements. The Supplier shall document anticipated hardware performance and the intended method of verifying compliance for each individual technical requirement contained in the F-16 BCSR Performance Specification (PS) 202023741. The Supplier shall provide agenda inputs to support a combined Government/Supplier agenda (Reference DID DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003 and DID
DI-SESS-81766, CDRL A007).
2.6 F-16 BCSR Configuration Management
The Supplier shall deliver a Configuration Management Plan (CMP) no later than 15 calendar days prior to PDR which has been tailored to specifically address the F-16 BCSR program. The CMP shall define configuration control requirements for the entire program, including post-retrofit sustainment. The CMP shall include a specific definition and process for identification, coordination, and approval of Class I and Class II engineering change notices by the Government. The Supplier shall provide a detailed CMP briefing at PDR. CMP format and content shall be consistent with best commercial practices (Reference DID DI-SESS-80858D, CDRL A004).
2.6.1 Quality Assurance
The CMP shall reference the Supplier’s Quality Assurance Plan (QAP). The QAP shall demonstrate Supplier compliance with ISO 9001:2015/AS9100D standards or equivalent. Access to the Supplier’s Quality Assurance System shall be available to the Contracting Officer for audits/surveys throughout the contract including all options.
2.6.2 Hardware Configuration
The new Brake and Antiskid Control Unit (BACU), Brake Control Valve (BCV) and harness configurations shall comply with the requirements of PS 202023741. During the design, development, qualification, and airworthiness certification phases of the program, the Supplier shall incorporate design changes as they are identified by the Government to satisfy PS performance, reliability, and maintainability requirements.
This provision includes, but is not limited to, all design changes identified during design reviews, qualification testing, fit checks, Technical Order (TO) validation/verification activities, and flight evaluation. Following airworthiness approval, the Supplier shall incorporate all design changes (as determined by the Government to satisfy PS 202023741) into all delivered production hardware and previously delivered evaluation articles such that these articles may eventually be incorporated into the Government supply system in production configuration, at no additional cost to the Government. The Government reserves the right to determine which assets are subject to this provision.
2.6.3 Tooling, Fixtures, and Inspection Equipment
The Supplier shall leverage/utilize existing F-16 tooling, fixtures and inspection equipment to support the BCSR configurations to the greatest extent possible. Any tooling capable of being locally manufactured by the USAF back shops shall have detailed drawings included in the applicable TOs. The Supplier shall deliver a single/complete set of stand-alone prototype tooling, fixtures, and inspection equipment to support depot TO validation/verification activities as defined in the contract no later than 22 months ARO (Reference DID DI-SESS-81004F, CDRL A012 and DID DI-
SESS-81008F, CDRL A013).
The required prototype tooling, fixtures and inspection equipment are as follows:
• BACU Prototype Equipment:
- Portable stand-alone automated test equipment capable of downloading any stored operational data and functionally testing the BACU
- All non-standard disassembly/assembly tooling/repair equipment necessary for overhaul of the BACU
• BCV Prototype Equipment:
- All non-standard disassembly/assembly tooling/repair equipment necessary for overhaul of the BCV
- All functional test equipment necessary to complete hydraulic functional testing on the USAF hydraulic test stands
2.6.4 Implementation/Troubleshooting Support
The Supplier shall provide technical/troubleshooting support to resolve performance or reliability issues identified by the Government during the retrofit period at no additional cost to the Government. This shall include, but is not limited to, performance/design deficiency resolution, Engineering Change Notice (ECN) processing, on-site support/assistance, and if necessary, parts rework/replacement resulting from equipment design/performance deficiencies.
3.0 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
3.1 Performance Specification (PS)
The proposed antiskid system shall satisfy all requirements/criteria set forth in PS 202023741 and shall interface at the weapon system level as a form, fit, function, interface-equivalent replacement.
3.2 Qualification Test Plan (QTP)
The Supplier shall deliver a draft QTP no later than 90 days prior to CDR which defines all formal qualification testing to be conducted by the Supplier. The QTP shall reference the TRD-SOW and PS and shall demonstrate how all performance/interface requirements will be demonstrated and when. The QTP outline/format shall mirror the PS and shall serve as an outline for the pending Qualification Test Report (QTR) (reference paragraph 3.10). The QTP can, at the discretion of the Supplier, include all system components in one QTP or have separate QTPs for each Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) or each group of tests (i.e. EMI and environmental, etc.). Final QTP approval shall be granted with Test Readiness Review (TRR) approval (reference paragraph 3.3) (Reference DID DI-NDTI-80566A, CDRL A005).
3.3 Test Readiness Review (TRR)
The Supplier shall support a TRR prior to initiating formal qualification testing. The Government shall determine the location and date of the TRR in coordination with the Supplier. The TRR shall occur approximately 30 calendar days prior to qualification test start (no later than 22 months ARO). TRR data/documentation shall be delivered for
Government review/comment a minimum of 15 calendar days prior to the TRR. The Supplier shall support the TRR with the following data/documentation as a minimum (Reference DID DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003 and DID DI-NDTI-80603A, CDRL A009):
• TRR Checklist and Approval Sheet (Supplier and Government signatures)
• QTP (reflecting prior Government feedback/approval)
• Qualification Test Schedule
• Assessment of Test Facilities/Equipment/Resources and Risks
3.4 Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
The Supplier shall deliver a Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) report in conjunction with CDR. The report shall be delivered a minimum of 15 calendar days prior to CDR to enable Government review/preparation. Analyses and conclusions from the report shall be summarized and briefed during CDR. (Reference DID DI-NDTI-
80809B, CDRL A008.)
3.5 Antiskid System Performance Evaluation Articles
The Supplier shall deliver a total of two (2) BCSR shipsets in accordance with the contract to serve as antiskid system performance evaluation articles. These articles will be used by the Government to perform a hardware-in-the-loop (HITL) antiskid system compliance evaluation. All assemblies shall be qualification equivalent (CDR-approved design). These articles shall be delivered no later than 22 months ARO.
3.6 Pre-CDR Fit Check Support/Articles
The Supplier shall support a pre-CDR aircraft fit check by providing development-vintage test assets (one shipset). The assets will not be considered formal contract deliverables and will not be retained by the Government following the event. The Supplier shall be responsible for shipping the assets to and from the fit check location.
The assets need not be functional, but they must simulate the anticipated design envelope and enable verification of physical/electrical/hydraulic interfaces. The pre-CDR fit check will be conducted at a date and location to be determined by the Government after contract award (no later than 12 months ARO).
3.7 Post-CDR Fit Check Support/Articles
The Supplier shall support a post-CDR aircraft fit check (and TO validation/verification per paragraph 4.5) by providing qualification-vintage test articles (one shipset) no later than 22 months ARO. The assets will not be considered formal deliverables and will not be retained by the Government following the event. The Supplier shall be responsible for shipping the assets to and from the fit check location. The assets must be fully functional and support completion of the following activities:
• Verification of physical/hydraulic interfaces on the aircraft (hydraulic pressurization, electrical connection, and an antiskid operational checkout)
• Verification of physical interfaces (via gear retraction/extension and inspection)
• Validation/verification of aircraft technical data (reference paragraph 4.5)
The post-CDR fit check will be conducted at a date and location to be determined by the Government after contract award.
3.8 Flight Test Support/Articles/Spares
The Supplier shall deliver approved configuration test articles to support flight testing of the BCSR equipment as defined in the table below. In addition to the flight test articles, the Supplier shall provide appropriate consumable spare parts that are unique to the new design (if any) to support flight test maintenance activities. Specific contents of the spares package shall be negotiated AFTER contract award and will not include any items currently stocked and managed by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). In order to facilitate pricing, the Government shall specify a Not-To-Exceed (NTE) price in the contract. The Supplier shall provide technical support as requested by the Government throughout the flight test effort, including post-flight test hardware inspections/assessments. The post-flight test inspection reports shall be delivered within 60 days of receiving flight test hardware (Reference DID DI-NDTI-80809B, CDRL A018).
ARTICLE QUANTITY USE and SPECIAL CONDITIONS
BACU 4 Four each BACUs shall be provided to support flight test.
BCV 4 Four each BCVs shall be provided to support flight test.
Wiring Harness 4 Four each wiring harnesses shall be provided to support flight test.
3.9 Vendor Airworthiness Certification Report (VACR)
No later than 34 months ARO, the supplier shall deliver a final VACR that addresses all F-16 BCSR Vendor Airworthiness Certification Criteria (VACC) requirements as defined by the Government. Contractor format is acceptable. This report shall document the Supplier’s claim that all critical performance requirements have been satisfied through testing/analysis and that the results demonstrate compliance with airworthiness requirements preparatory for aircraft flight testing. (Reference DID DI-NDTI-80809B, CDRL A016).
3.10 Qualification Test Report (QTR)
The final QTR shall demonstrate full compliance with all test requirements as outlined in PS 202023741 and this TRD-SOW. The QTR outline/format shall mirror that of the QTP (reference paragraph 3.2). Data that supports qualification by analysis/similarity shall be included within the QTR where appropriate. A compliance matrix referencing the applicable paragraphs of the QTP, PS, and this TRD-SOW shall be included. The final QTR shall be delivered no later than 30 months ARO (Reference DID DI-NDTI-80809B, CDRL A010).
3.11 Technical Data Package (TDP)
All drawings shall be prepared in accordance with (IAW) MIL-STD-31000. The Supplier shall PREPARE conceptual-level drawings/models for inclusion in the proposal and for review at PDR, developmental-level drawings/models for review at CDR, and production-level drawings/models for review at the conclusion of the qualification program. The conceptual-level design drawings are not contract deliverables.
The Supplier shall DELIVER assembly, subassembly, and commercial-level component drawings of sufficient detail and information to permit Government cataloging and procurement (Reference DID DI-SESS-81003F, CDRL A011). As a minimum, all commercial drawings shall include envelope dimensions, weights, performance parameters, and field/depot-level inspection requirements (as applicable).
Assembly/subassembly drawings shall identify/define each component within the assembly/subassembly.
If the Supplier separately prices the line items for Engineering Data Rights associated with the designs developed under this contract, the Supplier shall deliver assembly, subassembly, and production-level component drawings of sufficient detail and information to permit Government maintenance, modification, and engineering analysis (Reference DIDs DI-DRPR-81000A, DI-AVCS-80700A, and DI-SESS-81000F, CDRL B001).
4.0 TECHNICAL ORDERS (TOs)
4.1 Aircraft TO Source Data
The Supplier shall deliver procedural source data (including required figures/artwork) to support revision of aircraft TOs (system volumes and job guides). The Supplier shall submit draft source data deliverables prior to submitting final deliverables so that the Government can verify acceptability of data format/content and to facilitate formal validation/verification of the final products. Final (USAF-approved) aircraft TO source data shall be delivered no later than 47 months ARO (Reference TM-86-01Q, CDRL A014).
4.2 Commodity TO Source Data
The Supplier shall develop and deliver a single commodity TO that contains applicable intermediate-level maintenance information (if any), depot-level overhaul information, and an illustrated parts breakdown (IPB) for each LRU, (i.e. BACU and BCV). The commodity volume(s) shall provide details/instructions that are comparable to existing Government antiskid TOs. Additionally, the TOs shall include the tool, fixture, and inspection equipment drawing information with full manufacturing detail to support back shop and depot repair (as applicable). The Supplier shall submit, as a minimum, the following iterations to ensure the documents are compatible with format requirements of the Government’s Automated Technical Order System (ATOS) and to ensure that final content has been fully reviewed/approved. The Government may determine that additional submittals are required based upon Supplier performance. Final (USAF-approved) commodity TO source data shall be delivered no later than 47 months ARO (Reference TM-86-01Q, CDRL A014).
TO Iteration Purpose Minimum Submittal Requirements
SAMPLE
To determine format is compatible and acceptable with ATOS and to review proposed content
Sample from the BACU or BCV volume containing sufficient data to enable an ATOS compatibility assessment
DRAFT
To conduct table-top review for initial red line changes
Complete draft BACU and BCV volumes that are ATOS-compatible (two (2) volumes total)
FINAL DRAFT
To support TO Val/Ver and final red line changes
Updated draft versions with all requested changes incorporated (two (2) volumes total)
FINAL To support flight test Final versions (two (2) volumes total)
FINAL (Post Flight Test)
To incorporate any changes identified during flight test
Updated final versions (as required) (two (2) volumes total)
The commodity TO data shall include, as a minimum, the repairs and instructions listed below in paragraphs 4.2.1 and 4.2.2.
4.2.1 Repair - Brake and Antiskid Control Unit (BACU)
Depot repairs for the BACU shall include individual circuit card subcomponent repair/replacement in addition to all mechanical (housing/cover/display/indicator) repair with adequate repair limits identified.
4.2.2 Repair - Brake Control Valve (BCV)
Depot repairs for the BCV shall include, but are not limited to the areas identified in the following list:
Repair – Brake Control Valve Assembly
• Mounting point blend/bushing repair • Re-plating requirements for all plated components
(cadmium-free)
• Metering valve subcomponent repair/replacement • Filter/screen repair
Note: Minimum/maximum material conditions and allowable damage limits shall be clearly defined by appropriate figures.
4.3 TO Formatting
TO data (commodity and aircraft) shall be consistent with the style, format, and content of current TOs and comply with Government requirements (Reference TM-86-01Q, CDRL A014).
Examples of correctly formatted commodity TOs (combined, depot, and IPB content) are as follows:
Commodity TO Examples
TO 4BA8-47-3
TECHNICAL MANUAL
OVERHAUL INSTRUCTIONS WITH ILLUSTRATED PARTS
BREAKDOWN
DIGITAL ANTISKID CONTROL UNIT (DACU)
PART NO. 142-171
DACU MOUNTING PLATE ASSEMBLY
PART NO. 142-17140
TO 4BA4-131-3
TECHNICAL MANUAL
OVERHAUL INSTRUCTIONS WITH ILLUSTRATED PARTS
BREAKDOWN
ANTISKID CONTROL VALVE (ACV)
PART NO. 39-965
SERVOVALVE ASSEMBLY
PART NO. 37-543
4.4 TO Requirement Conferences (TORCs)
The Supplier shall support TORCs prior to and during development of all TO deliverables as deemed necessary by the Government. The purpose of TORCs shall be to establish expectations prior to commencing activities, review preliminary/interim submittals, ensure that changes/revisions have been incorporated as requested by the Government, and approve final submittals. TORCs shall be held at sites to be selected by the Government and will be documented by the Government with minutes and action items. The Supplier shall provide agenda inputs to support these conferences at least 30 days in advance and provide responses to all action items as assigned. The initial TORC shall be conducted no later than 9 months ARO (and may be held in conjunction with PDR) (Reference DID DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003).
4.5 Commodity TO Validation/Verification
The Supplier shall support coordination/completion of formal TO validation/verification activities with the Government for all TO data (field level and depot level) prior to submittal of final TO deliverables. TO validation/verification shall be accomplished at sites to be selected by the Government. The Supplier shall support all required visits with the latest BCSR configuration (reference paragraph 3.7) and all proposed prototype tooling, fixtures, and configuration-unique hardware required for validation/verification of the TO deliverables (including shipping to and from Government-defined destinations).
Government-requested revisions shall be promptly incorporated and submitted to the Government within 30 calendar days.
5.0 LOGISTICS
5.1 Spare Parts Packages
The Supplier shall deliver consumable spare parts packages in accordance with the quantities identified in the contract. Packages shall include parts required to support depot-level and Centralized Repair Facility (CRF) maintenance of the antiskid system for an initial two (2) year use period. Specific contents of the consumables package shall be negotiated AFTER contract award and will not include any items currently stocked and managed by the DLA. In order to facilitate pricing, the Government shall specify a Not-To-Exceed (NTE) price in the contract. Delivery containers shall be marked with a “F-16 BCSR PROGRAM” identification and include points of contact as defined by the Government prior to shipment.
5.2 Spares Requirement Conferences (SRCs)
The Supplier shall support SRCs prior to and during development of all logistics deliverables as deemed necessary by the Government. The purpose of SRCs shall be to consider/identify future spares requirements and to develop a preliminary long-term procurement schedule. SRCs shall be held at sites to be selected by the Government and will be documented by the Government with minutes and action items. The Supplier shall provide agenda/data inputs to support these conferences and provide responses to all action items as assigned. The initial SRC shall be conducted no later than 9 months ARO (and may be held in conjunction with PDR). The final SRC shall be conducted no later than 2 months after the Critical Design Review (and may be held in conjunction with CDR) (Reference DID-DI-ADMN-81249B, CDRL A003).
5.3 Logistics Management Information (LMI)
The Supplier shall provide LMI data to support cataloging, development of usage projections, and preparation for long-term sustainment of the new configurations.
Format, content, and schedule for submitting LMI data shall be determined by the Government at the initial SRC. Final LMI data shall be delivered no later than 36 months ARO (Reference CDRL A015).
5.4 Initial Investment Spare Parts
The Supplier shall deliver initial investment pipeline spare parts in support of the F-16 BCSR program as defined in the table below. Component types and quantities are listed as subcontract line items to the Initial Investment Spare Parts line item. The Supplier shall price these components within their proposal. Final specific components and component part numbers will be determined after CDR based on the Government approved design.
Investment Spares
ASSEMBLY QUANTITY
BACU 40
BCV 40
Wire Harness 40
BACU Housing 30
Metering Valve Solenoid 40
Circuit Card Assembly* 20
*Will be required to provide 20 of each circuit card identified in the final design.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .