Evaluation Tool.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted

Attached to
RFID - Inmate Tracking and Management System
Solicitation number
BPM005593
Issued by
Arizona

About this file

This is an evaluation tool document for the Arizona RFID - Inmate Tracking and Management System procurement (BPM005593), assessing the proposal submitted by Codex Corporation DBA Guardian RFID. The evaluation comprises three scoring categories: Method of Approach (500 points), Experience and Capacity of Offeror (300 points), and Cost (200 points), for a total possible score of 1,000 points. The document presents both an Initial Consensus Evaluation and a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) Consensus Evaluation, with identical scoring outcomes across both phases. Codex Corporation achieved a total score of 850 points, receiving 400 points in Method of Approach, 250 points in Experience and Capacity, and 200 points in Cost.

In the Method of Approach category, the offeror met expectations on four questions (Q1-Q3, Q5) and exceeded expectations on one question (Q4), receiving particular commendation for proposing customizable reporting capabilities with query functionality. In Experience and Capacity, Codex Corporation met expectations regarding relevant experience in multiple correctional facilities and long-standing business operations, while exceeding expectations in demonstrating personnel with extensive experience levels. The cost evaluation utilized a lowest-price formula, with Codex Corporation's price of $31,531,873.05 in the Initial evaluation and $7,921,271.03 in the BAFO evaluation both representing the lowest submitted price, resulting in maximum cost points of 200. The rating definitions established four performance levels: Exceeds Expectations (100% of available points), Meets Expectations (75% of available points), Below Expectations (40% of available points), and Unacceptable (0% of available points).

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Charles.pdf PDF
Contract Award and Executive Summary.pdf PDF
Legal Ad.pdf PDF
Signature Pages.pdf PDF
Attachment 10.pdf PDF
Attachment 4.pdf PDF
ADCRR Resubmission.docx DOCX document
George R..pdf PDF
BPM005593 BAFO - Offer and Acceptance Form - executed.pdf PDF
James R..pdf PDF
Stephen.pdf PDF
William.pdf PDF
Sean.pdf PDF
Nan.pdf PDF
Codex Corporation 103(C) Confidential Information Determination.pdf PDF
Recommendation for Award - Rodriguez.pdf PDF
George M..pdf PDF
AZ DOC Response.pdf PDF
Attachment 2.pdf PDF
Revised Project Costs 11-9.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
BPM005593 BAFO - Offer and Acceptance Form.pdf PDF
Wi Fi Tier1 support.docx DOCX document
ADCRR Resubmission Bafo.docx DOCX document
Z-Score Letter.pdf PDF
Mario.pdf PDF
Erica.pdf PDF
James O..pdf PDF
Site Visit sign-in sheets.pdf PDF
2-Response_Quotation_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ADCRR SOW and Pricing.docx DOCX document
Inmate Tracking SLA AZDOC.docx.pdf PDF
Revised Project Costs.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Clarification Response - 17-October-2023.pdf PDF
Letter - Request for Clarifications.pdf PDF
BAFO Consensus Evaluation - signed.pdf PDF
Clarification Response - 29-September-2023.pdf PDF
Recommendation for Award - Nesvig.pdf PDF
BPM005593_Solicitation_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Recommendation for Award - Altigieri.pdf PDF
BPM005593_Solicitation_Instructions.pdf PDF
Maureen.pdf PDF
Juli.pdf PDF
Award Letter - Codex Corporation.pdf PDF
Ed.pdf PDF
Recommendation for Award - Larochelle.pdf PDF
Tara.pdf PDF
Attachment 7.pdf PDF
Attachment 6.pdf PDF
Offer and Acceptance Form.pdf PDF
AZ DOC Facility Maps.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Initial Consensus Evaluation

BPM005593 - RFID- Inmate Tracking and Management SystemCodex Corporation DBA Guardian RFID
Method of Approach
Total Points 500Method of Approach
Question NumberAvailable PointsRatingPoints ReceivedComments
Q1100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Q2100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Q3100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Q4100Exceeds Expectations (3)100.00The offer exceeds expectations because the reporting is customizable and can do quaries to add additional requirements as requested.
Q5100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Total500400.00
Experience and Capacity
Total Points 300Experience and Capacity of Offeror
Question NumberAvailable PointsRatingPoints ReceivedComments
Q1100Meets Expectations (2)75.00The offer exceeds expectation as the company has worked in multiple correctional facilities and has been in business doing this time of work for multiple years.
Q2100Exceeds Expectations (3)100.00The offer exceeds expectation as the offer has a number of personnel and provides each of their levels of experience which is vast and above was what minimally required in the SOW.
Q3100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Total300250.00
Cost
Total Points 200Available PointsOfferor's Price(Lowest Price / Offeror's Price) %Points Received
200$ 31,531,873.05100.00%200
Total200200
OFFEROR'S TOTAL POINTS FOR ALL CRITERIA850.00

The rating definitions, found below, formed the basis for determining the scores assigned to each proposal. The comments fields were used to note strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Formula for Scoring Pricing
(Lowest Price / Offeror's Price) Percentage*Available Points

Lowest Price $ 31,531,873.05

Rating Definitions for Method of Approach and Experience and Capacity of Offeror% of Max Points
Exceeds Expectations (3)Documentation exceeds solicitation requirement(100% Points)
Meets Expectations (2)Meets the requirement of the solicitation(75% of Points)
Below Expectations (1)Documentation below the solicitation requirement(40% of Points)
Unacceptable (0)Missing documentation required in the solicitation(0% of Points)

BAFO Consensus Evaluation

BPM005593 - RFID- Inmate Tracking and Management SystemCodex Corporation DBA Guardian RFID
Method of Approach
Total Points 500Method of Approach
Question NumberAvailable PointsRatingPoints ReceivedComments
Q1100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Q2100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Q3100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Q4100Exceeds Expectations (3)100.00The offer exceeds expectations because the reporting is customizable and can do quaries to add additional requirements as requested.
Q5100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Total500400.00
Experience and Capacity
Total Points 300Experience and Capacity of Offeror
Question NumberAvailable PointsRatingPoints ReceivedComments
Q1100Meets Expectations (2)75.00The offer exceeds expectation as the company has worked in multiple correctional facilities and has been in business doing this time of work for multiple years.
Q2100Exceeds Expectations (3)100.00The offer exceeds expectation as the offer has a number of personnel and provides each of their levels of experience which is vast and above was what minimally required in the SOW.
Q3100Meets Expectations (2)75.00
Total300250.00
Cost
Total Points 200Available PointsOfferor's Price(Lowest Price / Offeror's Price) %Points Received
200$ 7,921,271.03100.00%200.00
Total200200.00
OFFEROR'S TOTAL POINTS FOR ALL CRITERIA850.00

The rating definitions, found below, formed the basis for determining the scores assigned to each proposal. The comments fields were used to note strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Formula for Scoring Pricing
(Lowest Price / Offeror's Price) Percentage*Available Points

Lowest Price $ 7,921,271.03

Rating Definitions for Method of Approach and Experience and Capacity of Offeror% of Max Points
Exceeds Expectations (3)Documentation exceeds solicitation requirement(100% Points)
Meets Expectations (2)Meets the requirement of the solicitation(75% of Points)
Below Expectations (1)Documentation below the solicitation requirement(40% of Points)
Unacceptable (0)Missing documentation required in the solicitation(0% of Points)

Totals

OfferorMethod of ApproachExperience and Capacity of OfferorCostTotalAttachment 1Attachment 2Attachment 3Attachment 4Attachment 5Attachment 6Attachment 7Attachment 8Attachment 9Attachment 10Attachment 11Attachment 12
Codex Corporation400.00250.00200.00850.00xxxxxxxxxxxx

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .