CN-370000-HW550-SA133.pdf

DEP CONTRACT NO.

Task Assignment #: Module #: Grant #:

Contractor Name:

Contractor Representative:

DEP Contract Manager: Phone #:

DEP Site #:

Site Name:

Address(Street, City, County):

Phase:

Task Description [use additional pages if necessary]:

The Deliverable and Invoice Schedule is attached.

Final Deliverables:

Final Deliverable Due Date:

TASK ASSIGNMENT TYPE AND NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNTS:

FIXED FEE

RETAINAGE:

TOTAL TASK ASSIGNMENT VALUE: $0.00

DEP Task Manager:

DEP Contract Manager:

Contractual Authority:

Contractor Representative:

CC: Procurement Section (MS 93) Section Representative ________

TASK ASSIGNMENT NOTIFICATION FORM

COST PLUS FIXED FEE

COST REIMBURSEMENT

FIXED PRICE FEE SCHEDULE

Period of Performance:

Execution of Task Assignment through:

DEP will review the deliverables to verify that they meet the specifications of this contract and task description. DEP’s Contract Manager shall notify the Contractor of any deficiencies in the deliverable(s) and shall give the Contractor reasonable opportunity to correct noted deficiencies and provide a revised deliverable(s).

WCP TAFORM 01_18

HW550

N/A N/ASOL-0A133

Geosyntec

Todd Kafka

850-245-8970Brandie Stringer

ERIC_7410

Indian River State College

4600 Kirby Loop Rd, Ft. Pierce, St. Lucie Co.

Assessment

Geosyntec will conduct supplemental assessment activities at Indian River State College, as detailed in the July 2, 2021 revised Geosyntec proposal. Samples will be collected from monitoring wells, soil, and surface water. Also included are costs for land clearing, utility locating, DPT groundwater sampling, and transportation and disposal (T&D) of IDW.

Geosyntec will provide a Site Assessment Work Plan, a Health & Safety Plan, Trip Reports, and a Supplemental Site Assessment Report as deliverables.

Supplemental Site Assessment Report

11/29/2021

02/04/2022

$ 148,746.77 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00

Brandie Stringer Digitally signed by Brandie Stringer Date: 2021.07.06 16:21:56 -04'00'

Brandie Stringer Digitally signed by Brandie Stringer Date: 2021.07.06 16:22:09 -04'00'

Teresa Booeshaghi Digitally signed by Teresa Booeshaghi Date: 2021.07.07 13:31:53 -04'00'

Todd K. Kafka, PG Digitally signed by Todd K. Kafka, PG Date: 2021.07.07 14:26:52 -04'00'

$ 148,746.77

Task Assignment Notification/Change Order Deliverables and Invoice Schedule Attachment

WCP TAFORM 04-2017

Contract Number:

Task Assignment #:

Deliverables:

Deliverable Deliverable Due Date

Invoice Schedule:

Requirements for Invoice Submittal Amount to be Invoiced

TOTAL COST

Site Assessment Work Plan and Health & Safety Plan - Subtask 2 08/06/2021

Site Assessment (Soil, Surface Water, & DPT Groundwater Sampling) Trip Report - Subtask 3 10/01/2021

Groundwater Sampling Trip Report - Subtask 4 10/08/2021

Waste Trip Report - Subtask 5 11/05/2021

Supplemental Site Assessment Report - Subtasks 1 & 6 11/29/2021

FDEP approval of Site Assessment Work Plan and Health & Safety Plan; FDEP approval of Site Assessment (Soil, Surface Water, & DPT Groundwater Sampling) Trip Report - Subtasks 2 & 3

$ 119,391.91

FDEP approval of Groundwater Sampling Trip Report; FDEP approval of Waste Trip Report - Subtasks 4 & 5 $ 15,430.52

FDEP approval of Supplemental Site Assessment Report; Project Management - Subtasks 1 & 6 $ 13,924.34

$ 148,746.77

HW550

SOL-0A133

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

Environmental Protection

Bob Martinez Center

2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

Ron DeSantis Governor

Jeanette Nuñez

Lt. Governor

Shawn Hamilton Interim Secretary

Memorandum

TO: Site # ERIC_7410

Indian River State College Fire Training Facility File

FROM: Brandie Stringer, Contract Manager

SUBJECT: Negotiation Summary

HW550 SOL-0A133

DATE: July 6, 2021

Geosyntec will conduct supplemental assessment activities at Indian River State College, as detailed in the July 2, 2021 revised Geosyntec proposal. Samples will be collected from monitoring wells, soil, and surface water. Also included are costs for land clearing, utility locating, DPT groundwater sampling, and transportation and disposal (T&D) of IDW. Geosyntec will provide a Site Assessment Work Plan, a Health & Safety Plan, Trip Reports, and a Supplemental Site Assessment Report as deliverables.

GeoTek Services, LLC will conduct utility survey. Action Environmental, LLC will provide land clearing services. Preferred Drilling Solutions, Inc. will conduct DPT groundwater sampling. Erwin Remediation, Inc. will provide T&D of IDW.

Negotiations between FDEP and Geosyntec resulted in saving FDEP a total of $1,020.02. Total task amount is $148,746.77. Geosyntec’s time, labor, and subcontractor costs for these activities have been reviewed and are appropriate. The level-of-effort and cost estimate are reasonable for the scope of services. Final deliverable is due November 29, 2021. Task completion date is February 4, 2022.

LEVEL OF EFFORT/EXPENSE WORKSHEET (Haz. Waste Dept.)

Contractor: Geosyntec Consultants

Date: 6/11/2021

Task #: SubTask 1 Project Management SubTask 6 Supplemental Site Assessment Report

Site: Indian River State College SubTask 2 Work Plan and HASP SubTask 7

Activity/Phase: SubTask 3 SubTask 8

Project Manager: Zack Munger SubTask 4 Groundwater Sampling SubTask 9

SubTask 5 Investigation Derived Waste SubTask 10

Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Labor Rate Category

Geosyntec Consultants

$34.13 Project Manager Z. Munger 60 59.8

$70.67 Principal E. Sager 20 4 10 1 1 4 0 0 0 0

$40.38 Project Professional M. Hensley 30 4 4 2 0 20 0 0 0 0

$34.13 Professional Z. Munger 94 2 50 0 0 42 0 0 0 0

$29.45 Staff Professional R. Joslyn 292 0 240 44 8 0 0 0 0 0

$28.85 Staff Professional J. Udvardy 66 0 27 39 0 0 0 0 0 0

$30.53 Admin Asst P Gallagher 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Hours 562.0 60 10 331 86 9 66 0 0 0 0

Direct Labor $18,378.59 $2,042.07 $512.46 $10,421.67 $2,572.38 $306.27 $2,523.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Overhead 172.70% $31,739.82 $3,526.65 $885.02 $17,998.22 $4,442.50 $528.93 $4,358.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Labor $50,118.41 $5,568.72 $1,397.48 $28,419.89 $7,014.88 $835.20 $6,882.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Other Direct Costs $918.92 $102.10 $25.62 $521.08 $128.62 $15.31 $126.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Supplemental Assessment Site Assessment (Soil, SW, and DPT GW Sampling)

IRSC_CEF-LOE_Supplemental Assessment_rev1.xls 7/2/2021 Page 1 of 8 Cost Estimate

Contractor: Geosyntec Consultants

Date: 6/11/2021

Task #: SubTask 1 Project Management SubTask 6 Supplemental Site Assessment Report

Site: Indian River State College SubTask 2 Work Plan and HASP SubTask 7

Activity/Phase: SubTask 3 SubTask 8

Project Manager: Zack Munger SubTask 4 Groundwater Sampling SubTask 9

SubTask 5 Investigation Derived Waste SubTask 10

Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Supplemental Assessment Site Assessment (Soil, SW, and DPT GW Sampling)

Travel

Vehicle Rental $3,038.00 $0.00 $2,165.00 $776.00 $97.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Mileage Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Air Fare $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Per diem + Hotel $4,818.00 $0.00 $3,650.00 $1,168.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Travel $7,856.00 $0.00 $5,815.00 $1,944.00 $97.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor (Equipment Procurement)

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Procurement Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Subcontractor Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor (Services Procurement)

Drilling (Conventional) $63,175.00 $0.00 $63,175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Drilling (Non-conventional) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Mobile Laboratory $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Surveying $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

IDW $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Utilities $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Clearing $3,950.00 $0.00 $3,950.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor Subtotal $71,125.00 $0.00 $68,625.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Handling Fee $6,717.25 $0.00 $6,467.25 $0.00 $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Subcontractor Cost $77,842.25 $0.00 $75,092.25 $0.00 $2,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Laboratory

Analytical Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Fast Turnaround Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Sample Shipping $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Laboratory $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Field Expenses

Personal Protection $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Expendables $1,007.50 $0.00 $747.50 $260.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Drilling related) $5,425.25 $0.00 $3,824.75 $1,600.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Analytical related) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (IDW related) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Other) $566.60 $0.00 $566.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Field Expenses $6,999.35 $0.00 $5,138.85 $1,860.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subtotal $143,734.93 $5,670.82 $1,423.10 $114,987.07 $10,948.00 $3,697.51 $7,008.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Completion Fee $5,011.84 $556.87 $139.75 $2,841.99 $701.49 $83.52 $688.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Estimated Cost $148,746.77 $6,227.69 $1,562.85 $117,829.06 $11,649.49 $3,781.03 $7,696.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

IRSC_CEF-LOE_Supplemental Assessment_rev1.xls 7/2/2021 Page 2 of 8 Cost Estimate

SITE : Indian River State College SUBTASK: Work Plan and HASP

DATE: 6/11/2021

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Principal (E. Sager)

Project Professional (Scientist/GIS) (M. Hensley)

Professional (Z. Munger)

TOTAL LABOR 10

Technical review of proposal (1 hr), technical discussions with FDEP on Draft Site Assessment Work Plan (1 hr), technical review of final Site Assessment Work Plan (2 hrs)

Prepare and revise draft Site Assessment Work Plan (4 hrs)

Proposal preparation (2 hrs)

IRSC_CEF-LOE_Supplemental Assessment_rev1.xls 7/2/2021 Page 3 of 8 Subtask 2

SUBTASK: Site Assessment (Soil, SW, and DPT GW Sampling)

DATE: 6/11/2021

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Principal

(E. Sager)

Project Professional (Scientist/GIS) (M. Hensley) 4

Professional

(Z. Munger)

Staff Professional

(J. Udvardy)

Staff Professional

(R. Joslyn) 240

TOTAL LABOR 331

TRAVEL

TYPE RATE UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Vehicle Rental

Truck $420.00 week 4 $1,680.00

Truck $97.00 day 5 $485.00 subtotal $2,165.00

Per diem ($36/110)

$36.00 day 25 $900.00

$110.00 day 25 $2,750.00 subtotal $3,650.00

TOTAL TRAVEL $5,815.00

2 truck x 2 days for soil and surface water sampling and 1 truck for 1 day for DPT groundwater sampling

Complete field preparation activities (1 hrs), field readiness review (1 hrs), rd trip mobe (3 hrs), conduct 2 days of soil and surface water sampling (2 days x 10 hrs = 20 hrs), finalize and organice field notes (2 hrs)

Technical discussions with field staff prior to (2 hrs) and during field investigations (0.25 hrs/day x 21 days = 5 hrs), technical discussions with FDEP prior to and during field investigations (2 hrs); review of Trip Report (1 hr)

Prepare ROW permit figures (2 hrs), update Work Plan figures and prepare figures/tables for Trip Report (2 hrs)

Complete field preparation activities and prepare/conduct field readiness review (8 hrs), field staff support and provide FDEP with daily progress updates (19 days x 0.5 hrs = 9 hrs), rd trip mobe (3 hrs), conduct 1 day of land clearing oversight (10 hrs), conduct 2 days of soil and surface water sampling (2 days x 10 hrs = 20 hrs)

1 person x 21 days 2 people x 2 days

Per Diem/Hotel

4 weeks for assessment

Complete ROW permit application (2 hrs), complete pre-field work and field preparation activities (2 hrs), field readiness review (1 hr), 5 rd trip mobes (5 days x 3 hrs = 15 hrs), conduct 21 days of DPT screen point sampling (21 days x 10 hrs = 210 hrs), set-up and breakdown (2 hrs), finalize and organize field notes (4 hrs), prepare Trip Report (4 hrs)

7/2/2021 Page 4 of 8 Subtask 3

SUBTASK: Site Assessment (Soil, SW, and DPT GW Sampling)

DATE: 6/11/2021

SUBCONTRACTOR (SERVICES PROCUREMENT)

NAME PURPOSE RATE UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Drilling (Conventional)

$61,945.00 Lump Sum 1 $61,945.00 $1,230.00 Lump Sum 1 $1,230.00 subtotal $63,175.00 Land Clearing

Action $3,950.00 Lump Sum 1 $3,950.00 $0.00 Lump Sum 0 $0.00 subtotal $3,950.00 Mobile Laboratory

$0.00 Lump Sum 0 $0.00 subtotal $0.00

Surveying GeoTek; utility survey (full day) $1,500.00 Lump Sum 1 $1,500.00 subtotal $1,500.00

TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR (SERVICES) $68,625.00

FIELD EXPENSES

ITEM RATE UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Drilling Related Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit 1 person x 4 weeks $834.20 week 4 $3,336.80 Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit 1 person x 1 day $208.55 day 1 $208.55 Soil Assessment Kit 2 days $139.70 day 2 $279.40 subtotal $3,824.75

Expendables $32.50 day 23 $747.50

Other Total GPS Station $566.60 week 1 $566.60 subtotal $566.60

TOTAL FIELD EXPENSES $5,138.85

21 days drilling, 2 days soil sampling

PDS; Maintenance of Traffic PDS; DPT GW sampling

7/2/2021 Page 5 of 8 Subtask 3

SUBTASK: Groundwater Sampling

DATE: 6/11/2021

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Principal

(E. Sager) 1

Project Professional (Scientist/GIS)

(M. Hensley) 2

Staff Professional

(J. Udvardy)

Staff Professional

(R. Joslyn)

TOTAL LABOR 86

TRAVEL

TYPE RATE UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Vehicle Rental

Truck 2 people x 4 days $97.00 day 8 $776.00 subtotal $776.00

Per diem ($36/110)

2 people x 4 days $36.00 days 8 $288.00

$110.00 days 8 $880.00 subtotal $1,168.00

TOTAL TRAVEL $1,944.00

FIELD EXPENSES

ITEM RATE UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Drilling Related

Deep Groundwater Sampling Kit 1 kit x 1 day $349.20 day 1 $349.20

Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit 1 kits x 2 days $208.55 day 2 $417.10

Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit 1 kits x 1 week $834.20 week 1 $834.20 subtotal $1,600.50

Expendables 1 person x 8 days $32.50 day 8 $260.00

TOTAL FIELD EXPENSES $1,860.50

Complete field preparation activities (4 hrs), mobilize/demobilize (3 hrs), collect sitewide depth-to-water measurements (4 hrs), complete monitoring well sampling with minimal purge volume (1.5 hrs/well x 18 wells = 27 hrs), complete monitoring well sampling with conventional purge volume (2 hrs/well x 1 wells = 2 hrs), finalize and organize field notes (2 hr), prepare Trip Report (2 hrs)

Review Trip Report (1 hr)

Update Work Plan figures and prepare figures/tables for Trip Report (2 hrs)

Complete field preparation activities (2 hrs), mobilize/demobilize (3 hrs), collect sitewide depth-to-water measurements (4 hrs), complete monitoring well sampling with minimal purge volume (1.5 hrs/well x 19 wells = 29 hrs), finalize and organize field notes (1 hr)

7/2/2021 Page 6 of 8 Subtask 4

SUBTASK: Investigation Derived Waste

DATE: 6/11/2021

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Principal

(E. Sager) 1

Staff Professional

(R. Joslyn) 8

TOTAL LABOR 9

TRAVEL

TYPE RATE UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Vehicle Rental

Truck 1 person x 1 day $97.00 day 1 $97.00 subtotal $97.00

TOTAL TRAVEL $97.00

SUBCONTRACTOR (SERVICES PROCUREMENT)

IDW

Erwin Remediation, Inc. $100.00 drum 25 $2,500.00 subtotal $2,500.00

TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR (SERVICES) $2,500.00

On-site IDW management (6 hrs), Trip Report (2 hrs)

Review Trip Report (1 hr)

7/2/2021 Page 7 of 8 Subtask 5

SUBTASK: Supplemental Site Assessment Report

DATE: 6/11/2021

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Principal

(E. Sager) 4

Project Professional (Scientist/GIS)

(M. Hensley) 20

Professional

(Z. Munger) 42

TOTAL LABOR 66

Provide technical support and review Supplemental Site Assessment Report (4 hrs)

Prepare figures/tables for Supplemental Site Assessment Report (20 hrs)

Process and evaluate analytical data, review figures/tables, and prepare Supplemental Site Assessment Report (42 hrs)

7/2/2021 Page 8 of 8 Subtask 6

19321 U.S. Highway 19 North, Building C, Suite 200 Clearwater, Florida 33764

PH 813.792.4820

www.geosyntec.com

2 July 2021

Ms. Brandie Stringer Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

Subject: Proposal and Cost Estimate Supplemental Site Assessment Indian River State College Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida

ERIC_7410

Dear Ms. Stringer, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) has prepared this Scope of Work (SOW) and Cost Estimate Form/Level of Effort (Attachment A) for additional assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soil, groundwater, and surface water at the Indian River State College’s (IRSC) fire training facility (Site) located in Fort Pierce, Florida. The objective of this investigation is to further evaluate the extent and magnitude of PFAS-impacted media at the Site. This proposal was prepared based on the findings and recommendations in the January 2021 Supplemental Site Assessment Report and correspondence with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).

Subtask 1 – Project Management

Zack Munger, PhD, will serve as the Project Manager for the proposed SOW. Costs associated with this subtask are directly computed.

Subtask 2 – Supplemental Site Assessment Work Plan and Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan

Geosyntec will prepare a Site Assessment Work Plan (Work Plan) that describes the proposed sampling activities to assess the presence or absence of soil impacts in the southern portion of the Site and delineate impacted soil, surface water, and groundwater that were previously identified.

The Work Plan will include figures showing the proposed sampling locations and a table summarizing the sampling locations, depth intervals, matrices, analytes and laboratory methods, rationale, and screening criteria. Consistent with previous PFAS-related work plans prepared for FDEP, the proposed sampling methods are discussed in this SOW and will not be summarized in the Work Plan. A draft copy of the Work Plan is included in Attachment B.

Geosyntec previously prepared a Site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) to address project-specific hazards that are known or suspected to be present due to existing conditions and work to be performed at the Site. No updates to the HASP are required to complete this SOW.

Subtask 3 – Site Assessment (Soil, Surface Water, and DPT Groundwater Sampling)

This subtask includes the estimated labor and subcontractor costs for Geosyntec to collect grab surface water samples and soil samples using a hand auger, use a direct-push technology (DPT) rig to collect grab groundwater samples at discrete intervals as summarized in the draft Work Plan (Attachment B), and clear vegetation to access the DPT sampling locations to the north of the Site. The work will be conducted in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for PFAS sampling that were developed by Geosyntec.

The activities included in this subtask are described below.

Pre-Field Work and Field Planning

This activity includes the items described below:

Applying for and obtaining right-of-way (ROW) permits from St. Lucie County to complete the DPT groundwater sampling along roadways to the south of the Site.

Activities associated with the ROW permits will include requesting a utility mark-out, mobilizing to the proposed sampling locations to map the marked utilities, and preparing scaled figures depicting the locations of the utilities and proposed well locations for submittal with the ROW application.

Contacting Sunshine 811 and obtaining a dig permit;

Procuring the utility locating, drilling, land clearing, and investigation derived waste

(IDW) transportation and disposal subcontractors;

Providing technical support to the FDEP Task Manager and Site Manager prior to mobilization;

Coordinating field activities with IRSC personnel;

Acquiring field equipment (groundwater sampling equipment, global positioning system

[GPS] unit, etc.) prior to sampling activities;

Requesting and reviewing specifications for materials and equipment from the selected drilling subcontractor prior to mobilization to confirm they are acceptable items and PFAS-free materials as described in the SOPs; and

Preparing for and conducting a field-readiness review webinar/teleconference with Geosyntec staff to discuss the scope of work, SOPs, and expectations to successfully complete the field sampling event.

Due to the complexities associated with a PFAS investigation and to expedite the completion of field activities, Geosyntec will mobilize one staff from our Titusville office and one staff from our Boca Raton office to complete the investigation activities at IRSC. We estimate that the land clearing activities will take 1 day to complete, soil and surface water sampling will take 2 days to complete, and the DPT groundwater sampling will take 21 days to complete. The anticipated timeframe to complete the work was based on input from the land clearing subcontractor, the drilling subcontractor, Geosyntec’s experience completing PFAS investigations, and the time necessary to follow PFAS SOPs to avoid cross contamination of samples.

Utility Locating, Land Clearing, and Drilling Subcontractors

Geosyntec will observe a subsurface survey to identify potential subsurface utilities or obstructions.

Based on previous experience at IRSC with subsurface utilities, Geosyntec proposes to sole source the utility survey to GeoTek Services, LLC (GeoTek). GeoTek estimates that the work will take one day to complete. Geosyntec has included costs to mobilize to IRSC and observe the survey concurrently with the first day of sampling activities. The GeoTek bid is included in Attachment C.

Geosyntec will provide oversight for land clearing activities required to access proposed DPT groundwater boring locations north of the Site property. Geosyntec requested bids for land clearing from Action Environmental, LLC (Action); Optimum Services, Inc.; and South Florida Land Clearing, Inc. Action provided the most competitive bid and their estimate is used in the Cost Estimate Form. South Florida Land Clearing, Inc. was unable to provide a bid. Action estimates that the work will take one day to complete. Geosyntec has included costs to mobilize to IRSC and observe the land clearing prior to mobilizing for sampling activities. The land clearing bids are included in Attachment D.

Based on previous drilling experience at IRSC, subcontractor availability, and availability of PFAS-free water for decontamination purposes, Geosyntec proposes to sole source the DPT groundwater sampling to Preferred Drilling Solutions, Inc. (PDS) due to their familiarity with the PFAS SOPs and decontamination procedures. The PDS quote includes the cost for providing PFAS-free water for decontamination purposes and maintenance of traffic for work conducted in rights-of-way.

The drilling quote is included in Attachment E.

Soil Investigation

Two Geosyntec staff will conduct soil sampling in accordance with the SOPs for PFAS sampling.

Soil samples will be collected from land surface to approximately 10 feet below land surface (ft BLS; the approximate depth the water table was observed at during previous assessment activities) at up to 19 boring locations (SB-49 through SB-67). Samples will be collected from 0 to 0.5, 0.5 to 2, 2 to 4, 5 to 7, and 8 to 10 ft BLS using a hand auger. If the water table is encountered at a depth shallower than 10 ft BLS, the soil sample interval will be terminated at the observed water table.

Geosyntec will document the lithology encountered and record the GPS coordinates of completed soil borings. Based on the number of proposed boring locations and depth intervals, Geosyntec will collect up to 95 soil samples in addition to quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples (discussed in more detail below). The sampling locations, depth intervals, matrices, laboratory analyses, rationale, and screening criteria will be summarized in the draft Work Plan (Attachment B).

Surface Water Investigation

Geosyntec will collect up to five surface water samples (SW-16 to SW-20) from Fivemile Creek and a retention pond and canals connected to Fivemile Creek. Geosyntec will also collect the appropriate number of QA/QC samples. The sampling locations, depth intervals, matrices, laboratory analyses, rationale, and screening criteria will be summarized in the draft Work Plan (Attachment B).

Groundwater Assessment (DPT Grab Sampling)

Geosyntec will mobilize one staff from our Titusville office to IRSC to complete the DPT groundwater sampling in accordance with SOPs for PFAS sampling. The DPT groundwater sampling will run concurrently with the soil and surface water sample collection. The objectives of the DPT groundwater investigation are to obtain vertical groundwater profiles of PFAS constituent concentrations at strategic locations across the Site to assess the horizontal and vertical extent of groundwater impacts. Geosyntec anticipates advancing up to 14 DPT groundwater borings. Depending upon refusal depths and production rates that can be achieved, groundwater samples will be collected at the 11 to 15, 26 to 30, and 41 to 45 and in 10-ft intervals beginning at the 46 to 50 ft BLS interval and down to 180 ft BLS (up to 17 groundwater samples per boring).

Based on lithology in the area and prior drilling experience, 180 ft BLS is estimated to be the maximum feasible depth to advance the groundwater sampler. Four proposed DPT groundwater borings are co-located with previously sampled locations (DEPMW-6/16/38 monitoring well cluster, SP-2, SP-9, and SP-19) and groundwater samples will be collected in 10-ft intervals beginning at the 46 to 50 ft BLS interval and down to 180 ft BLS (up to 14 groundwater samples per boring). The proposed DPT sampling locations are shown in Attachment B.

Based on the number of proposed boring locations and depth intervals, Geosyntec will collect up to 226 groundwater samples and an appropriate number of QA/QC samples. The approximate sampling locations, depth intervals, matrices, analytes and laboratory methods, rationale, and screening criteria are summarized in the draft Work Plan (Attachment B).

Laboratory Analysis

Geosyntec understands that the FDEP laboratory will analyze up to 95 soil samples, 5 surface water samples, and 226 DPT screen point groundwater samples for PFAS constituents, and the FDEP will ship the sampling kits to Geosyntec with return shipping labels. Geosyntec recommends following the QA/QC sampling protocol described in the SOPs for PFAS sampling.

We anticipate collecting duplicate samples at a ratio of 1:10 per water media (1 duplicate for surface water and 23 duplicates for groundwater screen point samples), equipment rinsates at a ratio of 1:20 with a minimum of at least one rinsate for each media sampled (5 rinsates for soil, 1 for surface water, and 12 for DPT screen point sampling equipment), and field blanks at a rate of at least 1 field blank for each type of water-sampling activity (1 for surface water, 1 for DPT groundwater, 1 for decontamination activities, and 1 extra field blank, if unforeseen conditions arise). Geosyntec understands that the FDEP will provide PFAS-free water for the equipment rinsates and field blanks and will deliver the PFAS-free water with the sampling kits.

Trip Report

Within three to five business days of completing this field event, Geosyntec will prepare a Trip Report briefly summarizing the field activities. The Trip Report will include a brief summary of work completed, figure(s) showing the sampling locations, a photo log depicting representative activities completed, and copies of field notes.

Subtask 4 – Groundwater Sampling

This subtask includes the estimated labor and subcontractor costs for Geosyntec to collect groundwater samples from Site monitoring wells. Geosyntec will mobilize one staff from our Titusville office and one staff from our Boca Raton office to IRSC. We estimate that the groundwater sampling summarized in this SOW will take approximately four days to complete.

The anticipated timeframe to complete the work was based on Geosyntec’s experience sampling the monitoring wells at IRSC and the time necessary to follow PFAS SOPs to avoid cross contamination of samples.

Geosyntec will collect groundwater samples from the 38 Site monitoring wells and QA/QC samples in accordance with SOPs for PFAS sampling. The sampling locations, depth intervals, matrices, analytes and laboratory methods, rationale, and screening criteria are summarized in the draft Work Plan (Attachment B).

Prior to groundwater sampling, Geosyntec will collect depth-to-water measurements from the 38 monitoring wells and 2 staff gauges to evaluate the groundwater flow directions. Geosyntec will evaluate groundwater flow directions, horizontal hydraulic gradients in the Surficial Aquifer, and vertical hydraulic gradients across the aquifer zones.

Laboratory Analysis

Geosyntec understands that the FDEP laboratory will analyze up to 38 groundwater samples for PFAS constituents, and the FDEP will ship the sampling kits to Geosyntec with return shipping labels. Geosyntec recommends following the QA/QC sampling protocol described in the SOPs for PFAS sampling. We anticipate collecting duplicate samples at a ratio of 1:10 per water media (4 duplicates for monitoring well samples), equipment rinsates at a ratio of 1:20 with a minimum of at least one rinsate for each media sampled (2 rinsates for groundwater sampling equipment), and field blanks at a rate of at least 1 field blank for each type of water-sampling activity (1 for groundwater and 1 for decontamination activities). Geosyntec understands that the FDEP will provide PFAS-free water for the equipment rinsates and field blanks and will deliver the PFAS-free water with the sampling kits.

Trip Report

Within three to five business days of completing field work, Geosyntec will prepare a Trip Report briefly summarizing the groundwater sampling activities. The Trip Reports will include a brief summary of work completed, figure(s) showing the sampling locations, a photo log depicting representative activities, and copies of field notes.

Subtask 5 –Investigation Derived Waste

Decontamination activities will take place in accordance with the SOPs for PFAS sampling at a designated staging and laydown area. The liquid IDW and soil cuttings generated will be containerized in 55-gallon drums and staged on Site at a location designated by Geosyntec. It is assumed 25 drums of IDW will be generated in Subtask 3 and Subtask 4, and the transportation and disposal cost of the drums are included under Subtask 5.

The FDEP requested that that IDW be sent to a landfill for disposal. Erwin Remediation, Inc (Erwin) has previously provided the most competitive bid for other fire training facilities, and Geosyntec proposes to sole source this work to Erwin. The IDW quote is included in Attachment F. We have assumed the analytical results from IRSC and those from previous waste characterization activities will be sufficient for waste characterization for liquid and solid IDW.

Geosyntec has included the costs to mobilize to IRSC, provide oversight of the IDW pickup, and sign waste manifests as an agent of FDEP to minimize potential disruption to IRSC operations. At the request of FDEP, Geosyntec can coordinate pick-up of the IDW with PBSC and sign/return manifests to the IDW subcontractor.

Trip Report

Within three to five business days of completing field work, Geosyntec will prepare a Trip Report briefly summarizing the IDW management activities. The Trip Report will include a brief summary of work completed, a photo log depicting representative activities, and copies of field notes.

Subtask 6 – Preparation of Supplemental Site Assessment Report

Geosyntec will prepare a Supplemental Site Assessment Report summarizing the field activities and sampling results. Summary table(s) and map(s) depicting the analytical results will be prepared. The report will also include recommendations for a path forward based on the current and previous results and discussions with FDEP.

Invoice and Deliverable Schedule:

Subtask Deliverable Deliverable Date Invoice Amount

Site Assessment Work Plan and Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan

6 August 2021 $1,562.85

Site Assessment (Soil, Surface Water, and DPT Screen Point Sampling) Trip Report

1 October 2021 $117,829.06

4 Groundwater Sampling Trip Report 8 October 2021 $11,649.49

Decontamination and Investigation Derived Waste Trip Report

5 November 2021 $3,781.03

1 & 6 Supplemental Site Assessment Report 29 November 2021 $13,924.34

Total $148,746.77

The above schedule is based on the assumptions that Geosyntec is tasked for this scope of work by 30 July 2021.

Assumes soil, surface water, and DPT screen point sampling occurs by 16 August 2021. Assumes monitoring well sampling occurs by 27 September 2021. Assumes a 3-week analytical data turnaround time for surface water, DPT screen point, and monitoring well sampling assessment data from FDEP laboratory.

As always, it is a pleasure to work with the FDEP. Please contact us if you have any questions or require additional information.

Sincerely, Zackary Munger, Ph.D.

Scientist

Eric Sager, P.G.(FL) Senior Principal Geologist

Copy: Todd Kafka, Geosyntec

Attachments

ATTACHMENT B

DRAFT SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN

Location ID Sample ID Matrix Depth

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

SB-49 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-49 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-49 (2-4') 2-4

SB-49 (5-7') 5-7

SB-49 (8-10') 8-10

SB-50 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-50 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-50 (2-4') 2-4

SB-50 (5-7') 5-7

SB-50 (8-10') 8-10

SB-51 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-51 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-51 (2-4') 2-4

SB-51 (5-7') 5-7

SB-51 (8-10') 8-10

SB-52 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-52 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-52 (2-4') 2-4

SB-52 (5-7') 5-7

SB-52 (8-10') 8-10

SB-53 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-53 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-53 (2-4') 2-4

SB-53 (5-7') 5-7

SB-53 (8-10') 8-10

SB-54 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-54 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-54 (2-4') 2-4

SB-54 (5-7') 5-7

SB-54 (8-10') 8-10

SB-55 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-55 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-55 (2-4') 2-4

SB-55 (5-7') 5-7

SB-55 (8-10') 8-10

SB-56 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-56 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-56 (2-4') 2-4

SB-56 (5-7') 5-7

SB-56 (8-10') 8-10

SB-57 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-57 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-57 (2-4') 2-4

SB-57 (5-7') 5-7

SB-57 (8-10') 8-10

SB-58 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-58 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-58 (2-4') 2-4

SB-58 (5-7') 5-7

SB-58 (8-10') 8-10

SB-59 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-59 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-59 (2-4') 2-4

SB-59 (5-7') 5-7

SB-59 (8-10') 8-10

SB-60 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-60 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-60 (2-4') 2-4

SB-60 (5-7') 5-7

SB-60 (8-10') 8-10

SB-61 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-61 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-61 (2-4') 2-4

SB-61 (5-7') 5-7

SB-61 (8-10') 8-10

SB-62 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-62 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-62 (2-4') 2-4

SB-62 (5-7') 5-7

SB-62 (8-10') 8-10

SB-60

SB-61

SB-62

SB-51

SB-52

SB-53

SB-54

SB-55

SB-56

SB-57

SB-58

SB-59

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

SB-49

SB-50

Soil HA PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Soil Cleanup Target Levels

Soil Sampling

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

SB-63 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-63 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-63 (2-4') 2-4

SB-63 (5-7') 5-7

SB-63 (8-10') 8-10

SB-64 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-64 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-64 (2-4') 2-4

SB-64 (5-7') 5-7

SB-64 (8-10') 8-10

SB-65 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-65 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-65 (2-4') 2-4

SB-65 (5-7') 5-7

SB-65 (8-10') 8-10

SB-66 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-66 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-66 (2-4') 2-4

SB-66 (5-7') 5-7

SB-66 (8-10') 8-10

SB-67 (0-0.5') 0-0.5

SB-67 (0.5-2') 0.5-2

SB-67 (2-4') 2-4

SB-67 (5-7') 5-7

SB-67 (8-10') 8-10

SW-16 SW-16

SW-17

SW-17 (DUP)

SW-18 SW-18

SW-19 SW-19

SW-20 SW-20

SP-21 (46-50')

SP-21 (46-50') (DUP)

SP-21 (56-60') 56-60

SP-21 (66-70') 66-70

SP-21 (76-80') 76-80

SP-21 (86-90') 86-90

SP-21 (96-100') 96-100

SP-21 (106-110') 106-110

SP-21 (116-120') 116-120

SP-21 (126-130') 126-130

SP-21 (136-140') 136-140

SP-21 (146-150')

SP-21 (146-150') (DUP)

SP-21 (156-160') 156-160

SP-21 (166-170') 166-170

SP-21 (176-180') 176-180

SP-22 (46-50') 46-50

SP-22 (56-60') 56-60

SP-22 (66-70') 66-70

SP-22 (76-80') 76-80

SP-22 (86-90')

SP-22 (86-90') (DUP)

SP-22 (96-100') 96-100

SP-22 (106-110') 106-110

SP-22 (116-120') 116-120

SP-22 (126-130') 126-130

SP-22 (136-140') 136-140

SP-22 (146-150') 146-150

SP-22 (156-160') 156-160

SP-22 (166-170') 166-170

SP-22 (176-180') 176-180

SB-63

SB-64

SB-65

SB-66

SP-21

46-50

DPT Sampling Points

86-90

146-150

SW-17

Surface Water N/A Grab PFAS Assess

Potential PFAS Impacts

SP-22

Surface Water Sampling

SB-67

Soil HA PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Soil Cleanup Target Levels

N/A

Groundwater DPT PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Groundwater

Cleanup Target Levels

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

SP-23 (46-50') 46-50

SP-23 (56-60') 56-60

SP-23 (66-70')

SP-23 (66-70') (DUP)

SP-23 (76-80') 76-80

SP-23 (86-90') 86-90

SP-23 (96-100') 96-100

SP-23 (106-110') 106-110

SP-23 (116-120') 116-120

SP-23 (126-130') 126-130

SP-23 (136-140') 136-140

SP-23 (146-150') 146-150

SP-23 (156-160') 156-160

SP-23 (166-170') 166-170

SP-23 (176-180') 176-180

SP-24 (46-50')

SP-24 (46-50') (DUP)

SP-24 (56-60') 56-60

SP-24 (66-70') 66-70

SP-24 (76-80') 76-80

SP-24 (86-90') 86-90

SP-24 (96-100')

SP-24 (96-100') (DUP)

SP-24 (106-110') 106-110

SP-24 (116-120') 116-120

SP-24 (126-130') 126-130

SP-24 (136-140') 136-140

SP-24 (146-150') 146-150

SP-24 (156-160') 156-160

SP-24 (166-170') 166-170

SP-24 (176-180') 176-180

SP-25 (11-15')

SP-25 (11-15') (DUP)

SP-25 (26-30') 26-30

SP-25 (41-45') 41-45

SP-25 (46-50') 46-50

SP-25 (56-60') 56-60

SP-25 (66-70') 66-70

SP-25 (76-80') 76-80

SP-25 (86-90') 86-90

SP-25 (96-100')

SP-25 (96-100') (DUP)

SP-25 (106-110') 106-110

SP-25 (116-120') 116-120

SP-25 (126-130') 126-130

SP-25 (136-140') 136-140

SP-25 (146-150') 146-150

SP-25 (156-160') 156-160

SP-25 (166-170') 166-170

SP-25 (176-180') 176-180

SP-26 (11-15') 11-15

SP-26 (26-30') 26-30

SP-26 (41-45') 41-45

SP-26 (46-50') 46-50

SP-26 (56-60') 56-60

SP-26 (66-70') 66-70

SP-26 (76-80') 76-80

SP-26 (86-90')

SP-26 (86-90') (DUP)

SP-26 (96-100') 96-100

SP-26 (106-110') 106-110

SP-26 (116-120') 116-120

SP-26 (126-130') 126-130

SP-26 (136-140') 136-140

SP-26 (146-150') 146-150

SP-26 (156-160') 156-160

SP-26 (166-170') 166-170

SP-26 (176-180') 176-180

Delineation Sampling

Provisional Groundwater

Cleanup Target Levels

96-100

86-90

46-50

SP-23

SP-24

SP-25

66-70

96-100

SP-26

11-15

Groundwater DPT PFAS

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

SP-27 (11-15') 11-15

SP-27 (26-30') 26-30

SP-27 (41-45') 41-45

SP-27 (46-50') 46-50

SP-27 (56-60') 56-60

SP-27 (66-70') 66-70

SP-27 (76-80')

SP-27 (76-80') (DUP)

SP-27 (86-90') 86-90

SP-27 (96-100') 96-100

SP-27 (106-110') 106-110

SP-27 (116-120') 116-120

SP-27 (126-130') 126-130

SP-27 (136-140') 136-140

SP-27 (146-150') 146-150

SP-27 (156-160') 156-160

SP-27 (166-170') 166-170

SP-27 (176-180') 176-180

SP-28 (11-15') 11-15

SP-28 (26-30') 26-30

SP-28 (41-45') 41-45

SP-28 (46-50') 46-50

SP-28 (56-60') 56-60

SP-28 (66-70')

SP-28 (66-70') (DUP)

SP-28 (76-80') 76-80

SP-28 (86-90') 86-90

SP-28 (96-100') 96-100

SP-28 (106-110') 106-110

SP-28 (116-120') 116-120

SP-28 (126-130') 126-130

SP-28 (136-140') 136-140

SP-28 (146-150')

SP-28 (146-150') (DUP)

SP-28 (156-160') 156-160

SP-28 (166-170') 166-170

SP-28 (176-180') 176-180

SP-29 (11-15') 11-15

SP-29 (26-30') 26-30

SP-29 (41-45') 41-45

SP-29 (46-50') 46-50

SP-29 (56-60')

SP-29 (56-60') (DUP)

SP-29 (66-70') 66-70

SP-29 (76-80') 76-80

SP-29 (86-90') 86-90

SP-29 (96-100') 96-100

SP-29 (106-110') 106-110

SP-29 (116-120') 116-120

SP-29 (126-130') 126-130

SP-29 (136-140') 136-140

SP-29 (146-150') 146-150

SP-29 (156-160') 156-160

SP-29 (166-170') 166-170

SP-29 (176-180') 176-180

Groundwater DPT PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Groundwater

Cleanup Target Levels

76-80

66-70

56-60

SP-27

SP-28

SP-29

146-150

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

SP-30 (11-15') 11-15

SP-30 (26-30') 26-30

SP-30 (41-45') 41-45

SP-30 (46-50')

SP-30 (46-50') (DUP)

SP-30 (56-60') 56-60

SP-30 (66-70') 66-70

SP-30 (76-80') 76-80

SP-30 (86-90') 86-90

SP-30 (96-100') 96-100

SP-30 (106-110') 106-110

SP-30 (116-120') 116-120

SP-30 (126-130') 126-130

SP-30 (136-140')

SP-30 (136-140') (DUP)

SP-30 (146-150') 146-150

SP-30 (156-160') 156-160

SP-30 (166-170') 166-170

SP-30 (176-180') 176-180

SP-31 (11-15') 11-15

SP-31 (26-30') 26-30

SP-31 (41-45')

SP-31 (41-45') (DUP)

SP-31 (46-50') 46-50

SP-31 (56-60') 56-60

SP-31 (66-70') 66-70

SP-31 (76-80') 76-80

SP-31 (86-90') 86-90

SP-31 (96-100') 96-100

SP-31 (106-110') 106-110

SP-31 (116-120')

SP-31 (116-120') (DUP)

SP-31 (126-130') 126-130

SP-31 (136-140') 136-140

SP-31 (146-150') 146-150

SP-31 (156-160') 156-160

SP-31 (166-170') 166-170

SP-31 (176-180') 176-180

SP-32 (11-15') 11-15

SP-32 (26-30')

SP-32 (26-30') (DUP)

SP-32 (41-45') 41-45

SP-32 (46-50') 46-50

SP-32 (56-60') 56-60

SP-32 (66-70') 66-70

SP-32 (76-80') 76-80

SP-32 (86-90') 86-90

SP-32 (96-100') 96-100

SP-32 (106-110') 106-110

SP-32 (116-120') 116-120

SP-32 (126-130') 126-130

SP-32 (136-140') 136-140

SP-32 (146-150')

SP-32 (146-150') (DUP)

SP-32 (156-160') 156-160

SP-32 (166-170') 166-170

SP-32 (176-180') 176-180

46-50

Groundwater DPT PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Groundwater

Cleanup Target Levels

146-150

41-45

26-30

SP-32

136-140

SP-30

SP-31

116-120

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

SP-33 (11-15')

SP-33 (11-15') (DUP)

SP-33 (26-30') 26-30

SP-33 (41-45') 41-45

SP-33 (46-50') 46-50

SP-33 (56-60') 56-60

SP-33 (66-70') 66-70

SP-33 (76-80') 76-80

SP-33 (86-90') 86-90

SP-33 (96-100')

SP-33 (96-100') (DUP)

SP-33 (106-110') 106-110

SP-33 (116-120') 116-120

SP-33 (126-130') 126-130

SP-33 (136-140') 136-140

SP-33 (146-150') 146-150

SP-33 (156-160') 156-160

SP-33 (166-170') 166-170

SP-33 (176-180') 176-180

SP-34 (11-15') 11-15

SP-34 (26-30')

SP-34 (26-30') (DUP)

SP-34 (41-45') 41-45

SP-34 (46-50') 46-50

SP-34 (56-60') 56-60

SP-34 (66-70') 66-70

SP-34 (76-80') 76-80

SP-34 (86-90') 86-90

SP-34 (96-100') 96-100

SP-34 (106-110') 106-110

SP-34 (116-120')

SP-34 (116-120') (DUP)

SP-34 (126-130') 126-130

SP-34 (136-140') 136-140

SP-34 (146-150') 146-150

SP-34 (156-160') 156-160

SP-34 (166-170') 166-170

SP-34 (176-180') 176-180

Groundwater DPT PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Groundwater

Cleanup Target Levels

26-30

11-15

SP-33

SP-34

116-120

96-100

(ft BLS) Method Analyses Rationale Criteria

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

DEPMW-1 (5-15') DEPMW-1 (5-15') 5-15

DEPMW-2 (7-17') DEPMW-2 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-3 (7-17') DEPMW-3 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-4 (7-17') DEPMW-4 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-5 (5-15') DEPMW-5 (5-15') 5-15

DEPMW-6 (7-17') DEPMW-6 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-7 (5-15') DEPMW-7 (5-15') 5-15

DEPMW-8 (7-17')

DEPMW-8 (7-17') (DUP)

DEPMW-9 (7-17') DEPMW-9 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-10 (5-15') DEPMW-10 (5-15') 5-15

DEPMW-11 (5-15') DEPMW-11 (5-15') 5-15

DEPMW-12 (5-15') DEPMW-12 (5-15') 5-15

DEPMW-13 (40-50') DEPMW-13 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-14 (40-50') DEPMW-14 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-15 (40-50') DEPMW-15 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-16 (40-50') DEPMW-16 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-17 (40-50') DEPMW-17 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-18 (38-48') DEPMW-18 (38-48') 38-48

DEPMW-19 (40-50') DEPMW-19 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-20 (7-17') DEPMW-20 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-21 (7-17') DEPMW-21 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-22 (7-17')

DEPMW-22 (7-17') (DUP)

DEPMW-23 (7-17') DEPMW-23 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-24 (7-17') DEPMW-24 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-25 (7-17') DEPMW-25 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-26 (7-17') DEPMW-26 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-27 (7-17')

DEPMW-27 (40-50') (DUP)

DEPMW-28 (7-17') DEPMW-28 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-29 (9-19') DEPMW-29 (9-19') 9-19

DEPMW-30 (7-17') DEPMW-30 (7-17') 7-17

DEPMW-31 (40-50')

DEPMW-31 (90-110') (DUP)

DEPMW-32 (40-50') DEPMW-32 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-33 (40-50') DEPMW-33 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-34 (40-50') DEPMW-34 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-35 (40-50') DEPMW-35 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-36 (40-50') DEPMW-36 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-37 (40-50') DEPMW-37 (40-50') 40-50

DEPMW-38 (90-110') DEPMW-38 (90-110') 90-110

Sonic, Electric Submersible

Groundwater PFAS Delineation Sampling

Provisional Groundwater

Cleanup Target Levels

Sonic, Peristaltic

Pump

7-17

40-50

DPT/Auger, Peristaltic

Pump

DEPMW-22 (7-17')

Monitoring Wells

7-17

DEPMW-27 (7-17')

DEPMW-31 (40-50')

DEPMW-8 (7-17') 7-17

Location ID Sample ID Matrix Analyses Rationale CriteriaEquipment Sampled

Table 1: Proposed Sampling Locations, Matrices, Analytes, Rationale, and Criteria Indian River State College

EQB-39

EQB-40

EQB-41

EQB-42

EQB-43

EQB-44

EQB-45

EQB-46

EQB-47

EQB-48

EQB-49

EQB-50

EQB-51

EQB-52

EQB-53

EQB-54

EQB-55

EQB-56

EQB-57

EQB-58

FRB-10

FRB-11

FRB-12

FRB-13

Notes:

1. SP indicates sampling point (via DPT). 8. SED indicates sediment sample

2. ft BLS indicates feet below land surface. 9. SW indicates surface water sample

3. SB indicates soil boring. 10. (spec) indicates specified or specification

4. MW indicates monitoring well. 11. DUP indicates duplicate.

5. HA indicates hand auger. 12. EQB indicates equipment blank.

6. PFAS indicates per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. 13. FRB indicates field reagent blank.

7. N/A indicates not applicable. 14. DPT indicates direct-push technology

PFAS

Evaluate potential impact of sample cross-contamination

N/A

Surface Water Sampling

Monitoring Well Sampling

Decontamination

Surface Water Sampling Equipment

DPT Groundwater Sampling Equipment

Monitoring Well Sampling Equipment

Field Reagent Blanks (1 per sample media)

Water

DPT Groundwater Sampling

Equipment Blanks (ratio of 1:20)

Water

Soil Sampling Equipment

PFAS

Assess potential sources of contamination from sampling equipment

N/A

Laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples

Figure 2

Proposed Sampling Locations and

Summary of Analytical Results in Groudwater

Indian River State College

4600 Kirby Loop Road

Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida

%2

%2

$1 $1 $1

$1 $1 $1 $1 $1

$1

$1 $1 $1

$1 $1

$1 $1 $1

$1 $1

$1

$1$1

$1

$1

$1 $1 $1

$1 $1

$1

$1

$1$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

Five M ile C reek

Parcel Owner (mulitple parcels within orange boundary):

Indian River Community College

Parcel Owner: District Board of Trustees of Indian River Community College

Parcel Owner: NSLRWCD

Parcel Owner: NSLRWCD

Parcel Owner: Indian River Community College

Parcel Owner:

North St. Lucie River Water Control District

Parcel Owner: Indian River Community College

Parcel Owner:Harry J Kicliter Jr (TR)

Parcel Owner:

Treasure Coast Land Development LLC

Parcel Owner:

Treasure Coast Land Development LLC

Parcel Owner:

Treasure Coast Land Development LLC

Parcel Owner:

Bethel Baptist Church of Fort Pierce Fla Inc.

Parcel Owner:

Joseph C Carter

Parcel Owner:

Indian River

Community College

Parcel Owner:

Indian River

Community College

Parcel Owner: North St. Lucie River Water Control District

Parcel Owner:

North St. Lucie River Water Control District

Parcel Owner: MWD/KGI Joint VentureParcel Owner:

MWD/KGI

Joint Venture

P a rc e l O w n e r: N

S L

R W

C D

Parcel O w ner: N orth St. Lucie

R iver W ater C ontrol D istrict

P a rc e l O w n e r: In d ia n

R iv e r C o m m u n ity

C o lle g e

Parcel Owner:

Edward F Ruby

Parcel Owner:

Harry J Kicliter Jr (TR)

Deborah F Fournier

Kirby Loop Road

TMW-2

DEPMW-9 (7-17')

DEPMW-7 (5-15')

DEPMW-3 (7-17')

DEPMW-1 (5-15')

DEPMW-30 (7-17')

DEPMW-29 (9-19')

DEPMW-28 (7-17')

DEPMW-27 (7-17')

DEPMW-26 (7-17')DEPMW-25 (7-17')

DEPMW-24 (7-17')

DEPMW-23 (7-17')

DEPMW-22 (7-17') DEPMW-21 (7-17')

DEPMW-20 (7-17')

DEPMW-12 (5-15')

DEPMW-37 (40-50')

DEPMW-36 (40-50')

DEPMW-35 (40-50')

DEPMW-34 (40-50')

DEPMW-33 (40-50')

DEPMW-32 (40-50')

DEPMW-31 (40-50')

TMW-1

DEPMW-8 (7-17')

DEPMW-6 (7-17')

DEPMW-5 (5-15')

DEPMW-4 (7-17')

DEPMW-2 (7-17')

DEPMW-11 (5-15')DEPMW-10 (5-15') DEPMW-19 (40-50')

DEPMW-18 (38-48')

DEPMW-17 (40-50')DEPMW-16 (40-50')

DEPMW-15 (40-50')

DEPMW-14 (40-50')

DEPMW-13 (40-50')

DEPMW-38 (90-110')

SP-30

SP-24

SP-21

SP-34

SP-33

SP-32

SP-31

SP-29

SP-28

SP-27

SP-25 SP-26

SB-67

SB-66

SB-65

SB-64

SB-63

SB-62

SB-61

SB-60

SB-59

SB-57

SB-56

SB-55

SB-54

SB-53

SB-52

SB-50

SW-20

SW-19

SW-16

SP-23

SP-22

SB-58

SB-51

SB-49

SW-18

SW-17

Feet

Date: June 14, 2021

Path: (Titusville-01\DATA) T:\0GIS\FR3598_IRSC_FTF\MXDs\202106\Prop_GW_SW_locs.mxd 14 June 2021 MAH

Legend

Proposed Screen Point (sample from 11- 15, 26-30, and 41-45 ft BLS)

Proposed Screen Point (sample from 11- 15, 16-20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, and 41-45 ft BLS)

") Proposed Sediment and Surface Water

Proposed Soil Sample (sample from 0-0.5 and 0.5-2 ft BLS)

%2 Temporary Monitoring Well

$1 Monitoring Well Location

Symbology Shading

Results Less than Provisional GCTL (70 ng/L)

At Least One Result Greater than Provisional GCTL (70 ng/L)

Approximate Proposed Land Clearing Area

Approximate AFFF Usage

Approximate Site Boundary

Adjacent Parcel Boundary

Notes:

1. ng/L indicated nanogram per liter.

2. TMW indicates temporary monitoring well.

3. GCTL indicates Florida Department of Environmental Protection Provisional Groundwater Cleanup Target Level.

4. AFFF indicates aqueous film forming foam.

5. Approximate site boundary and adjacent parcel boundaries obtained from Florida Department of Revenue GIS and Cadastral Mapping website on 14 May 2019

(St. Lucie County 2018 data).

6. Source of 2017 aerial: Florida Department of Transportation Aerial Photo Look Up System website.

ATTACHMENT C

UTILITY SURVEY QUOTE

GeoTek Services, LLC

16 May 2021

To: Zackary Munger

Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.

6770 South Washington Avenue, Suite 3 Titusville, Florida 32780

From: GeoTek Services, LLC 4060 Sparrow Hawk Road

Melbourne, Florida 32934

RE: Utility Locating Services – 32 Bore Locations, IRSC, Ft. Pierce, Florida

Mr. Munger, GeoTek Services is pleased to respond to your request for Utility Locating services at the IRSC located in Ft. Pierce, Florida. We will scan up to a 10’ x 10’ area around the 32 proposed bore locations with the goal of locating underground utilities.