B08_Attach_8_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD.docx

DOCX document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
NOCA 156728 Stehekin WWTP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P2023R0131
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service National Office

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor to complete and provide as a reference for a federal solicitation. The solicitation is for wastewater treatment plant services at Stehekin, Washington issued by the National Park Service with a number of 140P2023R0131. The past performance questionnaire requests information on a previous contract for the contractor including the project title, contract number, type of contract, awarded and final prices, award and completion dates, scope of work, and performance ratings in quality, schedule, cost control, management, small business subcontracting, regulatory compliance, and an overall recommendation. The reference is asked to provide ratings on a scale and comments supporting each rating. The completed questionnaire is to be returned to the contracting officer at the National Park Service Denver Service Center by a given date.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NOCA 156728 Stehekin WWTP, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P2023R0131_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_03_SF30_NOCA_156728_140P2023R0131_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_03_Attach_02_Solit_Clauses_Construction_REVISED_20230828_0003.docx DOCX document
B09_Amd_03_Attach_03_01_27_00_Definition_of_Contract_Line_Items_Rev_1_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2023R0131_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_03_Attach_01_140P2023R0131_QA3_0003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B09_Amd_03_Attach_05_NOCA_STEHEKIN_Drawings_for_Rev_2_Structural_Updates_08-25-23_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_03_Attach_04_32_62_17_Driven_Steel_Sheet_Piling_Rev_1_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_03_Specification_03_31_30_correction_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_SF30_NOCA_156728_140P2023R0131_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_11_Site_Visit_Sign-in_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_10_Site_Visit_Tri_Fold_NOCA_156728_0002.docx DOCX document
B09_Amd_02_Attach_05_Specification__40_66_40_correction_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_07_26_09_13_Electrical_Metering_Devices_Rev_1_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_02_Specification_01_73_20_correction_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_09_NOCA_STEHEKIN_Drawings_for_Rev_1_Electrical_Updates_08-10-2023_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2023R0131_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_04_Specification_40_61_96_correction_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_01_140P2023R0131_QA2_0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B09_Amd_02_Attach_06_Specification__46_53_25_correction_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_02_Attach_08_26_28_00_Overcurrent_and_Short_Circuit_Protective_Devices_Rev_1_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_01_140P2023R0131_QA1s_0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B09_Amd_01_SF30_NOCA_156728_140P2023R0131_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2023R0131_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_SF_1442_140P2023R0131.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_2d_NOCA_156728_100__CD_Drawings_Part4.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_5_Const_WD_DBA_WA20230065.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_2a_NOCA_156728_100__CD_Drawings_Part1.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_1_NOCA_156728_100___CD_Specifications.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_7_Deliverables_LmtOnSubconRpt_REQ.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach_4_22_10_06_-_Geotech_Report_for_Disposal_Field_Test_Pits_-r1.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2023R0131.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_2c_NOCA_156728_100__CD_Drawings_Part3.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_2b_NOCA_156728_100__CD_Drawings_Part2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_3_22_07_26_-_Final_Geo-tech_Report.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_6_Construction_Contract_Administration.docx DOCX document
B08_Attach_9_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs.doc DOC document
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
DUNS Number
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by
Time / Date
Name
CO or CS name
Title
Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist
Organization
National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email
First_Last@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .