Attachment 6 Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey Report.pdf

S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | www.smeinc.com

April 15, 2020

GBA Architecture

493 King Street, Suite 100

Charleston, South Carolina 29403

Attention: Mr. Shawn Mellin, AIA, LEED AP mellin@glickboehm.com

Reference: Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Update Report

Joint Base Charleston – Building 700

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-20-292

Dear Mr. Mellin:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide this asbestos and lead-based paint assessment update of the structure located at the referenced site. The attached report presents the findings of S&ME’s assessment conducted on

April 8, 2020. Our services were performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 42-2000093 dated

January 28, 2020. The following sections include the project background, sampling and analysis procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations.

This report is provided for the sole use of GBA Architecture, Joint Base Charleston, and their direct assignees. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the specific area referenced. The information provided in this assessment report should not be used as a bidding document, and field conditions should be verified.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (843) 884-0005.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

James L. McMillan James L. Killingsworth, CHMM

Staff Industrial Hygienist Environmental Services Area Manager/V.P.

Attachments

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Update Report

Joint Base Charleston – Building 700

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

Assessment Performed by:

4-16-2020

Anthony Prioleau (SCDHEC Accreditation #BI-01544) Date

Report Prepared by:

4-16-2020

James McMillan (SCDHEC Accreditation #BI- 01643) Date

PREPARED FOR:

GBA Architecture

493 King Street, Suite 100

Charleston, SC 29403

PREPARED BY:

620 Wando Park Boulevard

Mt Pleasant, SC 29464

April 16, 2020

North Charleston, South Carolina

April 16, 2020 ii

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Background

2.0 Site and Project Description

2.1 Purpose

2.2 Site Description

3.0 Assessment Procedures

3.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

3.2 Lead-Based Paint

4.0 Findings and Results

4.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

4.2 Lead-Based Paint

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

5.1 Asbestos Recommendations...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

5.2 Lead-Based Paint Recommendations ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

Appendices

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results

Appendix II – Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations, Confirmed ACMs and Lead-Based Paint

Appendix III - Copy of Inspectors’ SCDHEC Licenses

Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Records

Appendix V – Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings

Appendix VI – Support Data: 2016 and 2017 S&ME Reports

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 1

Executive Summary

An asbestos and lead-based paint assessment update was conducted on April 8, 2020, of Building 700 located at

Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base in North Charleston, South Carolina. This assessment update was requested to support planned mechanical and fire-suppression upgrades. This assessment updates and supplements the

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Report, prepared by S&ME, dated November 30, 2016, and the

Supplemental Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Testing Report, also prepared by S&ME, dated August 23, 2017. The purpose of the assessment was to update the referenced reports, perform additional sampling and testing as necessary for a revised and expanded project scope, and identify the presence of asbestos containing materials

(ACMs) and lead-based paint associated with the structure to support planned renovations. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of ACMs that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

Building 700 is located at Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base, serves as an aircraft hangar, approximately

96,000 square feet in size, and situated on a concrete slab, on-grade. Interior office and support area finishes include concrete masonry unit (CMU) and drywall walls, suspended ceiling systems with acoustical tiles, and various floor coverings. Exterior finishes consist of steel structural framing with metal paneling. The building was occupied on the day of our assessment.

Asbestos Assessment

The suspect ACMs sampled as part of the assessment update performed on April 8, 2020, include drywall, gasket material and door insulation associated with the boiler, vinyl sheet flooring and associated mastic, acoustical ceiling tiles, and fire-stop mastic. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of the previous assessments, and the supplemental sampling performed as part of this assessment, the ACMs summarized in the following table were confirmed present:

Table I: Summary of Confirmed ACMs

Material HA Location Asbestos

Type Percent Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

*Approx.

Quantity

1Pipe Elbows/Joints on 3” and 8” O.D. Water Lines

PE

West Hangar

Wall (Interior) Chrysotile 8-10 G, F LPD 29 each

1Caulk (grey) C Exterior Wall

Louvers Chrysotile 2 G, NF I LPD 125 SF

*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.

1Identified in previously performed assessment.

Abbreviations:

HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear feet O.D. = Outside Diameter

G = good D = damaged NF = non-friable F = friable

LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for sig. disturbance

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 2

The identified asbestos containing pipe elbows/joint insulation is classified as friable ACM, with a low potential for disturbance due to the planned mechanical upgrades. The identified asbestos containing caulk (grey) is classified as a Category I non-friable ACM, in good condition, also with a low potential for disturbance.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

(SCDHEC), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines a material as an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

Prior to any activity that disturbs the identified ACMs, we recommend proper removal and disposal of the ACM by a SCDHEC licensed asbestos abatement, as required by the EPA and SCDHEC. Onsite asbestos air monitoring must be performed by a SCDHEC licensed Air Sampler in conjunction with removal of friable ACMs or non-friable

ACMs rendered friable and totaling 160 square feet or 260 linear feet or greater. If additional suspect ACMs not addressed in this report are discovered, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect material(s). This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

Lead-Based Paint Assessment

A lead-based paint assessment update was performed on April 8, 2020, concurrently with the asbestos assessment. Testing was performed to assess the physical condition of lead-based paints identified in the referenced 2016 and 2017 S&ME reports, and test any painted surfaces not previously addressed. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology using a Heuresis

Pb200i (serial #1852). The following lead-based paints and respective conditions were confirmed:

• Hangar door curbing (yellow paint on concrete) – non-deteriorated condition;

• Wall guards at threshold of roll-up door on west side (beige paint on metal) – non-deteriorated condition.

The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as a coating with a lead level of 0.7 milligrams per square centimeter

(mg/cm2) as measured by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) technology. The SCDHEC requires disposal of lead-based paint coated components in a Class II or III landfill. Accumulations of paint waste (chips, dust, or flakes) must be tested by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) to determine if the waste is classified as hazardous, which requires disposal in a Subtitle C (hazardous waste) landfill. Lead waste, at a minimum, must be disposed in a Class

II or Class III, lined landfill.

Additionally, low levels of lead were detected in other various paint coatings which may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.

Destructive actions to paint containing detectable levels of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

This summary if for the convenience of the ready and should not be completely relied upon without reviewing the full contents of this report, including appended materials.

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 3

1.0 Background

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by GBA Architecture to perform an asbestos and lead-based paint assessment update of Building 700 located at Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base in North Charleston, South Carolina. This assessment update was requested to support planned mechanical and fire-suppression upgrades. This assessment updates and supplements the Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Report, prepared by S&ME, dated November 30, 2016, and the Supplemental Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Testing Report, also prepared by

S&ME, dated August 23, 2017. The purpose of the assessment was to update the referenced reports, perform additional sampling as necessary for a revised and expanded project scope, and identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint associated with the structure to support planned renovations.

The assessment update also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of ACMs that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

The asbestos assessment was conducted to assess, sample, and identify ACMs in accordance with regulatory requirements. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the

Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations related to ACMs.

The purpose of the lead assessment update was to assess the current condition of previously identified lead-based paint coatings associated with the referenced structure. The identification of lead-based paints and materials will aid in the compliance of occupational exposure (OSHA) and/or environmental releases of airborne lead dust in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) and provide information to determine proper disposal of lead-based paint coated components and debris in accordance with the SCDHEC and the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

2.0 Site and Project Description

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of ACMs and lead-based paint prior to destructive activities associated with the planned mechanical and fire-suppression upgrades. An assessment strategy appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal and is described in this report. The report should be interpreted only with regard to the specific location and materials referenced.

2.2 Site Description

Building 700 is located at Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base, serves as an aircraft hangar, approximately

96,000 square feet in size, and situated on a concrete slab, on-grade. Interior office and support area finishes include concrete masonry unit (CMU) and drywall walls, suspended ceiling systems with acoustical tiles, and

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 4 various floor coverings. Exterior finishes consist of steel structural framing with metal paneling. The building was occupied on the day of our assessment.

3.0 Assessment Procedures

3.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The assessment was performed by reviewing the referenced 2016 and 2017 S&ME reports, prepared by S&ME.

Following review, the facility was subsequently assessed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs not addressed in the referenced reports. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as wall voids. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and EPA.

Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to our in-house laboratory for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). No non-friable organically bound materials required confirmation analysis via Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The laboratory is located in Charlotte, North

Carolina and is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal

Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part 763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics: morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors. The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified

(there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

One representative sample from each suspect non-friable organically bound homogeneous material, which exhibited negative results via PLM analysis, was analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with

ASTM E2356 per SCDHEC requirements.

Suspect ACMs are categorized based on the EPA’s NESHAP regulation categories. A friable ACM is classified as an

ACM that can be crumbled to a powder by moderate hand pressure. A non-friable ACM is classified as either

Category I or Category II non-friable ACM. Category I and Category II non-friable ACMs are distinguished from each other by their fiber release potential when damaged. Generally, Category I non-friable ACM, which by definition includes intact asbestos-containing roofing materials, gaskets, packing, and resilient floor coverings, is less likely to become friable and release fibers in a damaged state. Category II non-friable ACM include all other non-friable ACMs excluding Category I that have a high probability of being rendered friable during removal

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 5 activities or demolition. All friable ACM, Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or Category II non-friable

ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations are considered to be a

Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM).

3.2 Lead-Based Paint

The lead-based paint assessment update was performed by reviewing the referenced S&ME reports (provided in

Appendix VI), visually assessing identified lead-based paints associated with the referenced structure, and testing surfaces not previously addressed. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence

(XRF) technology using a Heuresis Pb200i (serial #1852). The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment update, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint.

The OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m3

4.0 Findings and Results

4.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The assessment update and supplemental sampling of suspect ACMs was performed on April 8, 2020, and consisted of drywall, gasket material and door insulation associated with the boiler, vinyl sheet flooring and associated mastic, acoustical ceiling tiles, and fire-stop mastic. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of the previous assessments, and the supplemental sampling performed as part of this assessment, the ACMs summarized in the following table were identified:

Table I: Summary of Confirmed ACMs

Material HA Location Asbestos

Type Percent Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

*Approx.

Quantity

1Pipe Elbows/Joints on 3” and 8” O.D. Water Lines

PE

West Hangar

Wall Chrysotile 8-10 G, F LPD 29 each

1Caulk (grey) C Exterior Wall

Louvers Chrysotile 2 G, NF I LPD 125 SF

*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.

1Identified in previously performed assessment.

Abbreviations:

HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear feet O.D. = Outside Diameter

G = good D = damaged NF = non-friable F = friable

LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for sig. disturbance

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 6

The identified asbestos containing pipe elbows/joint insulation is classified as friable ACM, with a low potential for disturbance due to the planned mechanical upgrades. The identified asbestos containing caulk (grey) is classified as a Category I non-friable ACM, in good condition, also with a low potential for disturbance. The EPA, SCDHEC, and OSHA defines a material as an ACM if an asbestos content of greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

A summary of asbestos results is provided in Appendix I, and exhibits the sample number, location, type of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and corresponding result for each sample. A diagram of bulk sample locations is provided in Appendix II, and a copy of the inspectors’

SCDHEC licenses are provided in Appendix III. A copy of the laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Appendix IV, and the referenced 2016 and 2017 reports are provided as support data in Appendix VI.

4.2 Lead-Based Paint

A lead-based paint assessment update was performed on April 9, 2020, concurrently with the asbestos assessment update. Of the lead-based paint previously identified and the additional surfaces tested as part of this assessment the following lead-based paints and respective conditions were confirmed:

• Hangar door curbing (yellow paint on concrete) – non-deteriorated condition;

• Wall guards at threshold of roll-up door on west side (beige paint on metal) – non-deteriorated condition.

The referenced lead-based paints were observed to be in non-deteriorated (intact) condition on the day of the assessment update. A summary of XRF results is provided in Appendix V and should be reviewed in its entirety.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The asbestos and lead-based paint assessment update conducted on April 8, 2020, of Building 700 located on

Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base in North Charleston, South Carolina, confirmed the presence of friable and

Category I non-friable ACMs, in good condition. Lead-based paint (>0.7 mg/cm2), applicable to the SCDHEC and

EPA disposal standards, was also confirmed in addition to low levels of lead that may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA regulations found in 29 CFR 1926.62. Based on the planned renovation/upgrades, it is our understanding the identified ACM and lead-based paint will not be impacted or require removal and disposal. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

This report is provided for the sole use of GBA Architecture, Joint Base Charleston, and their assignees. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or specification for the abatement of hazardous materials.

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

April 16, 2020 7

S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site.

The findings of the asbestos assessment update were based largely on visual observations within the amount of time available. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos containing materials have been identified; ACMs and lead-based paint could be present in areas not readily-accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance or related operations. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as under soils and inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples should be collected by an asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.

Summary of Asbestos Results

Joint Base Charleston - Building 700

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

Date of Sampling: April 8, 2020

HA Material Description Material

Location

2Approx.

Quantity

Cat.

(F/I/II)

Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample

Location

1Type and

Percent

Asbestos

292-DW-01 Shop (113) ND

292-DW-02 Breakroom ND

292-DW-03 Jets Admin ND

292-RG-01 Boiler Room ND

292-RG-02 Boiler Room ND

292-RG-03 Boiler Room ND

292-BDI-01 Boiler Room ND

292-BDI-02 Boiler Room ND

292-BDI-03 Boiler Room ND

292-VSF-01 Shop (113)

ND

ND

292-VSF-02 Breakroom

ND

ND

³292-VSF-03 Jets Admin

ND

ND

292-CT-01 Shop (113) ND

292-CT-02 Breakroom ND

292-CT-03 Jets Admin ND

292-FS-01 Foam Room (112) ND

292-FS-02 Foam Room (112) ND

³292-FS-03 Foam Room (112) ND

LF = linear feet Sur = Surfacing Misc. = Miscellaneous EA = each

F= friable TSI = Thermal System Insulation PD = potential for disturbance Bold = >1% Asbestos

NF = non-friable G = good PSD = potential for significant disturbance

Cat I = Category I D = damaged ND = No Asbestos Detected

Cat II = Category II SD = significantly damaged N/A = Not Applicable

EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample

Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified

Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis

F

NF Cat I

Misc.

Misc. N/A

N/A

VSF

Boiler Door Insulation

Vinyl Sheet Flooring (grey)

Mastic (tan)

Boiler Room

Shop (113), Break Room, &

Admin

BDI

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

Misc.DW Drywall Metal Shop 1,000 SF F N/A

N/ARG

1,536 SFCeiling Tile (2x2, white)CT Throughout F Misc. N/A

Rope Gasket Boiler Room 10 LF F Misc.

1,536 SF

6 SF

Misc. N/AFS Fire Stop (red) Foam Room 10 LF NF Cat I

Appendix II – Diagrams of Bulk Sample Locations, Confirmed ACMs and Lead-Based Paint

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

ASBESTOS CONTAINING ELBOWS/JOINTS

ON 3.0" O.D. AND 8.0" O.D. WATER LINES

-APPROXIMATELY 29 EACH

LEAD-BASED PAINT

WALL GUARD (METAL; BEIGE) AT THRESHOLD

OF SMALL ROLL-UP DOOR ON WEST SIDE.

BULK SAMPLE LOCATIONS

LEGEND

292-XX-XX

L

DN

DN

DN

DN

UP

BOILER

ROOM

STORAGE

MEN'S

RESTROOM

OFFICE

BREAK

ROOM

STORAGE

WOMEN'S

RESTROOM

TOOL

ROOM

F L

I G

H T

L E

A D

E R

S H

I P

SECTION

CHIEFS

HANGAR

FOAM

ROOM

(112)

SHEET

METAL

SHOP

SMCO

(113)

C O

O R

D I N

A T

O R

S

S H

A C

K

JETS

ADMIN.

OFFICE

CONF. ROOM /

BREAK

ROOM

VEST.

KIT

STO

L

L

SIDE C

SIDE A

292-FS-01

292-FS-02

292-FS-03

292-VSF-01

292-DW-01

292-CT-01

292-VSF-02

292-DW-02

292-CT-02

292-VSF-03

292-DW-03

292-CT-03

292-RG-01

292-RG-02

292-RG-03

292-BDI-01

292-BDI-02

292-BDI-03

FIGURE NO.

T P r o j e c t s E N

V

G l i c k

B o e h m a n d

A s s o c i a t e s J B

C

A

F B l d g

A b N o r t h

C a r l e s t o n C

A D d w g

PROJECT NUMBER

DATE:

SCALE:

0 40 80

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

B U

I L D

I N

G

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R E S T O

N

N O

R T H

A

R L E S T O

N

S O

U

A R

O L I N

A

4-16-2020

A S

B E

S T

O S

N D

L

E A

D B

A S

P

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

U

P D

A T

E

AS SHOWN

4213-16-292

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

CAULK (GRAY) LOCATED AROUND WALL LOUVERS

-APPROXIMATELY 125 SQUARE FEET

LEAD-BASED PAINT

HANGAR DOOR CURB (CONCRETE)

-APPROXIMATELY 2,100 SQUARE FEET

SIDE C

SIDE A

SIDE B

SIDE D

FIGURE NO.

T P r o j e c t s E N

V

G l i c k

B o e h m a n d

A s s o c i a t e s J B

C

A

F l d g

A b N o r t a r l e s t o n C

A D d w g

PROJECT NUMBER

DATE:

SCALE:

0 40 80

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

B U

I L D

I N

G

R

O O

F

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R E S T O

N

N O

R

A

R L E S T O

N

S O

U

R

O L I N

A

4-16-2020

A S

B E

S T

O S

N

L

A

D B

A S

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

U

P D

A T

E

AS SHOWN

4213-16-292

Appendix III- Copy of Inspectors’ SCDHEC Licenses

South Carolina

Department of Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

Antonio Prioleau

Building Inspector BI-01544

Air Sampler AS-00494

S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com http://www.smeinc.com/

Department of Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

John McEathron

Building Inspector BI-00794

Air Sampler AS-00235

S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com http://www.smeinc.com/

Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of

Custody Records

Charleston Branch 620 Wando Park Blvd.

Mt. Pleasant SC 29464

Asbestos Analysis Summary

Client Job

Client Name

Date Analyzed

Date Received

4/13/2020

4/10/2020

Joint Base Charleston Bldg 700

9771D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-16-292

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

2 CELLULOSE 98 GYPSUM20-6222 292-DW-01 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

2 CELLULOSE 98 GYPSUM20-6223 292-DW-02 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

2 CELLULOSE 98 GYPSUM20-6224 292-DW-03 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 GLASS <1 OTHER20-6225 292-RG-01 GOLD FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane Wasilewski Laboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-16-292

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 GLASS <1 OTHER20-6226 292-RG-02 GOLD FIBROUS ND

100 GLASS <1 OTHER20-6227 292-RG-03 GOLD FIBROUS ND

100 MINERAL WOOL20-6228 292-BD1-01 PALE YELLOW FIBROUS ND

100 MINERAL WOOL20-6229 292-BD1-02 PALE YELLOW FIBROUS ND

100 MINERAL WOOL20-6230 292-BD1-03 PALE YELLOW FIBROUS ND

65 CELLULOSE

5 MINERAL WOOL

30 PERLITE20-6231 292-CT-01 GREY FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-16-292

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

15 PERLITE20-6232 292-CT-02 GREY FIBROUS ND

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

15 PERLITE20-6233 292-CT-03 GREY FIBROUS ND

5 SYNTHETIC

5 GLASS

90 OTHER20-6234A 292-VSF-01 GREY FIBROUS NDSHEET FLOOR 1

100 OTHER20-6234B 292-VSF-01 YELLOW NONFIBROUS NDMASTIC 1

5 SYNTHETIC

3 GLASS

92 OTHER20-6234C 292-VSF-01 GREY FIBROUS NDSHEET FLOOR 2

5 SYNTHETIC

5 GLASS

90 OTHER20-6235A 292-VSF-02 GREY FIBROUS NDSHEET FLOOR 1

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-16-292

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER20-6235B 292-VSF-02 YELLOW NONFIBROUS NDMASTIC 1

5 SYNTHETIC

5 GLASS

90 OTHER20-6235C 292-VSF-02 GREY FIBROUS NDSHEET FLOOR 2

2 GLASS 98 OTHER20-6237 292-FS-01 RED FIBROUS ND

2 GLASS 98 OTHER20-6238 292-FS-02 RED FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

10801 Southern Loop Blvd Pineville, NC 28134

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 412003447

Customer ID: SMEI54

Customer PO: 4213-16-292

Project ID:

Attention: Jane Wasilewski Phone: (704) 940-1830

S&ME, Inc. Fax: (704) 565-4929

9771D Southern Pine Blvd. Received Date: 04/10/2020 1:00 PM

Charlotte, NC 28273 Analysis Date: 04/14/2020

Collected Date:

4213-16-292 (Phase 2020)Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

292-VSF-03

412003447-0001

Sheet Floor 1 White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

292-VSF-03

412003447-0002

Mastic Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

292-VSF-03

412003447-0003

Sheet Floor 2 Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

292-FS-03

412003447-0004

Fire Stop Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100.0 None No Asbestos DetectedOther

Analyst(s)

Derrick Young (4) Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Pineville, NC

Initial report from: 04/15/2020 07:55:54

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 4/15/2020 7:56:01AM Page 1 of 1

OrderID: 412003447

Appendix V – Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings

Summary of XRF Spectrum Lead Analyzer Readings

Joint Base Charleston - Building 700

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

Date(s) of Testing: April 8, 2020

XLN

No.

Site Floor Side Room Structure Component Substrate Color Condition Results

Action

Level Lead Units

1 Calibration 1 mg/cm

2 Calibration 1 mg/cm

3 Calibration 0.9 mg/cm

4 Building 700 1 C Break Room Wall Drywall Blue Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0.1 mg/cm

5 Building 700 1 D Break Room Baseboard Wood Blue Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

6 Building 700 1 A Break Room Misc. Wainscoting Wood Blue Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

7 Building 700 1 A Sheet Metal Door Casing Metal Beige Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0.1 mg/cm

8 Building 700 1 A Sheet Metal Door Metal Beige Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

9 Building 700 1 C Sheet Metal Wall Drywall Beige Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0.1 mg/cm

10 Building 700 1 D Sheet Metal Vertical Pole Metal Beige Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

11 Building 700 1 A Sheet Metal Door Casing Metal Brown Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0.3 mg/cm

12 Building 700 1 A Foam Room Door Casing Metal Brown Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0.5 mg/cm

13 Building 700 1 A Foam Room Door Metal Brown Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

14 Building 700 1 C Foam Room Wall CMU Beige Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

15 Building 700 1 C Foam Room Wall Metal Beige Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0 mg/cm

16 Building 700 1 B Foam Room Misc. Tank Metal Red Non-deteriorated NEG 0.7 0.1 mg/cm

17 Calibration 0.7 1.1 mg/cm

18 Calibration 0.7 1.1 mg/cm

19 Calibration 0.7 1.1 mg/cm

The SCDHEC requires special disposal for paint containing lead ≥0.7 mg/cm

The OSHA does not recognize a concentration of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration a worker is exposed.

Bold = Lead results meeting or exceeding SCDHEC disposal level of 0.7 mg/cm

Appendix VI – Support Data: 2016 and 2017 S&ME Reports

S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | f 843.881.6149 | www.smeinc.com

August 23, 2017

Glick Boehm and Associates

493 King Street, Suite 100

Charleston, South Carolina 29403

Attention: Mr. Shawn Mellin, AIA, LEED AP mellin@glickboehm.com

Reference: Supplemental Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Testing Report

Joint Base Charleston – AFB Building 700

Dear Mr. Mellin:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide this report summarizing the supplemental asbestos and lead-based paint testing we performed on August 17, 2017, limited to the exterior of the referenced structure.

Our services were performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 42-1600509 dated April 19, 2016. The following sections include the project background, sampling and analysis procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations.

Project Background

On August 10, 2017, you contacted Jim Killingsworth via email and requested a proposal for supplemental asbestos and lead-based paint testing, limited to the exterior of Building 700 to support planned renovations. On February 8, 2017, Jim Killingsworth and Bill Seaborn (S&ME) performed the referenced testing. As requested, the assessment did not include the interior of the structure. The purpose of the assessment was to assess, identify, and provide recommendations to properly treat asbestos containing materials (ACMs) associated with the interior of the subject unit, to prevent worker exposures, emissions and properly dispose of the subject materials.

The structure located at Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base is a hanger, approximately 93,000 square feet in size. The subject unit is used as a repair hanger for C-17 aircraft. The exterior finishes are comprised of metal and concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls with a sloped metal roof. The structure was occupied on the day of our site visit.

Procedures

Asbestos

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples, limited to the interior of the referenced unit, in accordance with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

(SCDHEC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) minimum sampling requirements. Bulk mailto:mellin@glickboehm.com

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Supplemental Testing Report

Joint Base Charleston – AFB Building 700

August 23, 2017 2 samples of suspect ACMs were collected by an SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs, recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to our in-house

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) laboratory. Confirmation of negative results were analyzed by

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) by EMSL Analytical for those non-friable organically bound materials reported negative via PLM. The laboratories are located in Charlotte, North Carolina and both are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Lead-based Paint

The suspect painted finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 milligrams per centimeter squared (mg/cm2) or greater by

XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned activities.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m3.

Findings and Results

Asbestos

The supplemental testing performed on August 17, 2017, included the assessment and bulk sampling of roof flashing mastic, and caulk. Based on the results of the bulk samples collected from the subject areas, the identified ACMs are summarized in Table 1 on the following page.

Table 1: Summary of Confirmed ACMs

Material HA Location Asbestos

Type Percent Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

*Approx.

Quantity

Caulk (grey) C Exterior Wall

Louvers Chrysotile 2 G, NF PD 125 SF

*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.

Abbreviations:

HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear foot

G = good D = damaged NF = non friable F = friable

LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for sig. disturbance

The identified asbestos containing caulk is classified as a Category I non-friable ACM, in good condition, with a potential for disturbance due to the planned renovations. No asbestos was detected in the

August 23, 2017 3 remaining bulk samples collected and analyzed. The EPA and the OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

The summary of asbestos results is provided in Attachment I, and a diagram of bulk sample locations and confirmed ACMs is provided in Attachment II. A copy of the inspector’s SCDHEC license is provided in

Attachment III, and the laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Attachment IV.

Lead

Based on the assessment and testing performed on February 8, 2017, of the painted components associated with the interior of the referenced unit, the following components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 mg/cm2 and are considered lead-based paint.

Hanger door curbing (yellow paint on concrete) – intact condition

The identified lead-based paints were in intact condition on the day of the assessment. Low levels of lead were also identified on multiple surfaces which may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR

1926.62 (Lead in Construction), depending on the tasks impacting those painted surfaces.

The location and extent of the identified lead-based paint is graphically represented in Attachment II, Figure 1 with a supporting digital image in Attachment II, Photo 1. The summary of XRF readings is provided in Attachment V, and should be reviewed in full.

Limitations

The asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to the exterior of the subject area and did not include an assessment of interior or the entire building. The sampling was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs associated with the referenced areas, and the possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as flooring overlays and wall voids/cavities.

This report is provided for the sole use of the client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling and of the specific area(s) referenced.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment performed on August 17, 2017 at Building 700 at

Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base in North Charleston, South Carolina, identified the presence of a

Category I non-friable ACM and lead-based paint applicable to the SCDHEC and EPA disposal requirements. Low levels of lead were also identified which may be applicable to the standards of the

OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), depending on the tasks impacting those painted surfaces.

This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) working in the referenced areas.

August 23, 2017 4

Asbestos Recommendations

If the identified asbestos containing caulk will be disturbed as part of the planned renovations, we recommend proper removal and disposal of the ACM by a SCDHEC licensed asbestos abatement contractor. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned renovation activities that are not addressed in this report, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector, prior to continuation of the work or disturbance to the material.

Lead Recommendations

The identified lead-based paints may be removed from the substrate, removed along with the building component, or properly prepared and re-coated. The lead-based paints identified are applicable to EPA, OSHA and SCDHEC standards associated with the treatment and disposal of lead-based paints.

In regard to disposal, component removal of the items containing lead-based paint requires disposal in a

Class II or Class III lined landfill. Accumulations of paint waste (sludge, chips, dust, or flakes) and lead contaminated products must be tested by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) to determine if the waste is classified as hazardous, which requires disposal in a Subtitle C (hazardous waste) landfill. Lead waste, at a minimum, must be disposed in a Class II or III landfill.

Destructive actions to paint containing detectable levels of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) may require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) depending upon the planned impacts to those subject paints. OSHA compliance may require training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance. Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations

29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

Closing

S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services and we look forward to our continued association. If you have any questions concerning the results, please call either of us at (843) 884-0005.

Sincerely, William R. Seaborn James L. Killingsworth, CHMM

Staff Professional Environmental Services Area Manager, V.P.

Attachment I – Summary of Asbestos Results

Joint Base Charleston - Air Force Base, Building 700

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

Date of Sampling: August 17, 2017

Sample No. Location Material Approx.

Quantity

Asbestos

Type Percent Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

Hazard

Assessment

292-BRS-01 Roof above office area ND NA NA NA NA

292-BRS-02 Roof above office area ND NA NA NA NA

292-BRS-03 Roof above office area ND NA NA NA NA

292-C-01 Wall louvers - SW wall Chrysotile 2 G, NF PD 3

292-C-02 Wall louvers - SW wall Chrysotile 2 G, NF PD 3

292-C-03 Wall louvers - SW wall Not Analyzed 2 G, NF PD 3

ND = No Asbestos Detected LPD = low potential for disturbance F= friable

NA = Not Applicable PD = potential for disturbance

SF = square feet PSD = potential for significant disturbance EA = each

LF = linear feet

EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.

Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis.

D = damaged NF = non-friable

SD = significantly damaged

Caulk

Table II: Summary of Asbestos Results

25 SFRoof Flashing Mastic

125 LF

G = good

Attachment II – Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations and

Confirmed ACMs and Digital Photograph

292-C-1

292-C-2

292-C--3

292-BRS-1

292-BRS-2

292-BRS-3

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

CAULK (GRAY) LOCATED AROUND WALL LOUVERS

-APPROXIMATELY 125 SQUARE FEET

LEAD-BASED PAINT

HANGAR DOOR CURB (CONCRETE)

-APPROXIMATELY 2,100 SQUARE FEET

BULK SAMPLE LOCATIONS

LEGEND

292-XX-XX

SIDE C

SIDE A

SIDE B

SIDE D

SCALE:

PROJECT NO.

DRAWN BY:

DATE:

APPROVED BY:

FIGURE NO.

Q d r a w i n g s

B l d g d w g

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SUPPLEMENT

BUILDING 700

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON - CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

AS SHOWN LAJ JLK

4213-16-292 8-22-2017

TRUEPROJ.

00 40' 80'

Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base, Building 700 Representative Photograph Project…