Attachment 1 Specs Repair Aircraft Maint Hangar B700.pdf

SPECIFICATION

REPAIR AIRCRAFT

MAINTENANCE HANGER,

BUILDING 700

AT

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON

AIR BASE, SOUTH CAROLINA

PROJECT No.: DKFX 11-1171

1051184 TWCF

SUBMITTAL DATE: 29 January, 2021

ARCHITECTURE / PLANNING / INTERIOR DESIGN

493 King Street, Suite 100 Charleston, South Carolina 29403

Telephone: 843.577.6377 / Fax: 843.722.1768 Internet: www.gbaarchitecture.com

GBA Project No.: 2003

Project Design Team

Architect: Glick/Boehm & Associates, Inc.

493 King Street, Suite 100 Charleston, South Carolina 29403 843.577.6377

Mechanical / Plumbing / DWG Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Electrical Consultant: 1009 Anna Knapp Blvd., Suite 202 Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina 29464 843.849.1141

Structural Consultant: ADC Engineering 1226 Yeamans Hall Road Hanahan, South Carolina 29406 843.566.0161

Environmental/Geotech: S&ME, Inc.

620 Wando Park Blvd.

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina 29464 843.884.0005

Repair Aircraft Maint. Hanger Bldg. 700 DKFX 11-1171-1051184 TWCF

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

00 01 15 LIST OF DRAWINGS

00 31 26 INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO PROPOSERS

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 11 00 JBCGS SUMMARY OF WORK

01 14 00 JBCGS WORK RESTRICTIONS

01 22 00.00 10 Unit Price Payment

01 30 00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

01 32 16.00 20 JBCGS PROJECT SCHEDULE AND PROGRESS DOCUMENTATION

01 33 00 JBCGS SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 35 26 JBCGS GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00 JBCGS QUALITY CONTROL FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION

01 45 35 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

01 50 10 JBCGS ENVIRONMENTAL

01 54 00 JBCGS GREEN PROCUREMENT

01 57 20 JBCGS WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 57 50 JBCGS TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

02 82 16.00 20 ENGINEERING CONTROL OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

02 82 33.13 20 REMOVAL/CONTROL AND DISPOSAL OF PAINT WITH LEAD

DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE

03 30 00 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

DIVISION 05 - METALS

05 05 23.16 STRUCTURAL WELDING

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

05 51 33 METAL LADDERS

05 52 00 METAL RAILINGS

DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

07 41 13 METAL ROOF PANELS

07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS

DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS

08 22 20 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) DOORS AND FRAMES

08 43 13 BLAST RESISTANT ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 91 00 METAL WALL LOUVERS

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

DIVISION 09 - FINISHES

09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR GYPSUM BOARD

09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD

09 30 00 CERAMIC TILE

09 51 00 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS

09 65 00 RESILIENT FLOORING

09 68 00 CARPET

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

DIVISION 21 - FIRE SUPPRESSION

21 13 25 HIGH-EXPANSION FOAM SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION

DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING

22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

DIVISION 23 - HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC)

23 00 00 AIR SUPPLY, DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS

23 03 00.00 20 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

23 05 15 COMMON PIPING FOR HVAC

23 05 48.00 40 VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

23 09 23.02 BACNET DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL FOR HVAC AND OTHER BUILDING

CONTROL SYSTEMS

23 23 00 REFRIGERANT PIPING

23 31 13.00 40 METAL DUCTS

23 81 00 DECENTRALIZED UNITARY HVAC EQUIPMENT

23 81 00.00 20 UNITARY AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT

23 81 43 AIR-SOURCE UNITARY HEAT RECOVERY UNITS

DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL

26 00 00.00 20 BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

26 05 48.00 10 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

26 08 00 APPARATUS INSPECTION AND TESTING

26 09 23.00 40 LIGHTING CONTROL DEVICES

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

26 51 00 INTERIOR LIGHTING

DIVISION 27 - COMMUNICATIONS

27 10 00 BUILDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLING SYSTEM

DIVISION 28 - ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

28 05 26.00 40 GROUNDING AND BONDING FOR ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

28 31 76 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

DOCUMENT 00 01 15

LIST OF DRAWINGS

02/11

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SUMMARY

This section lists the drawings for the project pursuant to contract clause "DFARS 252.236-7001, Contract Drawings, Maps and Specifications."

1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS

Contract drawings are as follows:

DKFX 11-1171 REPAIR AIRCRAFT HANGER MAINTENANCE HANGER B700

GENERAL

1 of 56 G000 COVER SHEET 2 of 56 G001 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION 3 of 56 G100 PROJECT MAPS 4 of 56 G101 PROJECT AND CODE INFORMATION

STRUCTURAL

5 of 56 S000 GENERAL NOTES 6 of 56 S101 FOUNDATION PLAN 7 of 56 S102 PLATFORM FRAMING PLAN 8 of 56 S201 TYPICAL DETAILS 9 of 56 S221 TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS 10 of 56 S222 TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS 11 of 56 S231 TYPICAL CMU DETAILS 12 of 56 S241 ATFP DETAILS

ARCHITECTURAL EXISTING

13 of 56 AE100 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 14 of 56 AE130 EXISTING ROOF PLAN 15 of 56 AE200 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 16 of 56 AE201 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION

17 of 56 AD100 DEMOLITION PLAN 18 of 56 AD120 DEMOLITION CEILING PLAN 19 of 56 AD130 DEMOLITION ROOF PLAN 20 of 56 AD200 DEMOLITION ELEVATIONS 21 of 56 AD201 DEMOLITION ELEVATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL

22 of 56 A100 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 23 of 56 A101 FLOOR PLANS - 1 STORY AREA 24 of 56 A120 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 25 of 56 A130 ROOF PLAN 26 of 56 A200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 27 of 56 A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 28 of 56 A420 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 29 of 56 A421 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 30 of 56 A500 TYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHT DETAILS

DOCUMENT 00 01 15 Page 1

31 of 56 A560 CEILING DETAILS

PLUMBING

32 of 56 P001 PLUMBING NOTES & LEGENDS 33 of 56 P101 PLUMBING PLAN

MECHANICAL

34 of 56 M001 HVAC - NOTES & LEGENDS 35 of 56 M002 HVAC SCHEDULES 36 of 56 M003 HVAC DETAILS 37 of 56 M003 HVAC DETAILS 38 of 56 M051 HVAC DEMOLITION PLAN 39 of 56 M052 HVAC ENLARDED DEMO PLANS 40 of 56 M101 HVAC NEW WORK PLAN 41 of 56 M102 HVAC NEW WORK ENLARGED PLAN 42 of 56 M500 HVAC ISOMETRIC AND SECTION VIEWS 43 of 56 M501 HVAC ISOMETRIC AND SECTION VIEWS

ELECTRICAL

44 of 56 E001 ELECTRICAL NOTES & LEGENDS 45 of 56 E002 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES & DETAILS 46 of 56 E002 ELECTRICAL DETAILS 47 of 56 E010 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES 48 of 56 E051 POWER & SYSTEMS DEMO KEY PLAN 49 of 56 E052 POWER & SYSTEM ENLARGED DEMO PLANS 50 of 56 E053 LIGHTING DEMO KEY PLAN 51 of 56 E054 LIGHTING ENLARGED DEMO PLANS 52 of 56 E101 POWER & SYSTEMS KEY PLAN 53 of 56 E102 POWER & SYSTEMS ENLARGED PLANS 54 of 56 E103 LIGHTING PLAN 55 of 56 E104 LIGHTING ENLARGED PLANS 56 of 56 E105 LIGHTING CALCULATIONS

1051184 TWCF REPAIR AIRCRAFT HANGER MAINTENANCE HANGER FIRE SYSTEMS B700

GENERAL

1 of 8 G000 COVER SHEET

ELECTRICAL

2 of 8 E200 ELECTRICAL NOTES & FOAM ROOM POWER PLAN 3 of 8 ED201 FIRST FLOOR SYSTEMS DEMO PLAN 4 of 8 ED202 SYSTEMS ENLARGED DEMO PLANS 5 of 8 E201 FIRST FLOOR SYSTEMS PLAN 6 of 8 E202 SYSTEMS ENLARGED PLANS

FIRE PROTECTION

7 of 8 FP100 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN

MECHANICAL

8 of 8 M100 MECHANICAL FOAM ROOM PLAN

-- End of Document --

DOCUMENT 00 01 15 Page 2

DKFX 11-1171 Repair Aircraft Maint. Hanger, Bldg. 700

SECTION 00 31 26

INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO PROPOSERS

03/01

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SUMMARY

These documents furnish the following physical data as attachments.

a. Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report JBC-AFB

Building 700, dated November 30, 2016

b. Supplemental Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Testing

Report Joint Base Charleston-AFB Building 700, dated August 23,

1.2 PROPOSERS RESPONSIBILITY

Data and information furnished in the attached document produced by S&ME, Mount Pleasant, SC is for the Proposer's information. The Government shall not be responsible for any interpretation of, or conclusion drawn from, the data or information by the Proposer.

PART 2 NOT USED

PART 3 NOT USED

-- End of Section --

DOCUMENT 00 31 26 Page 1

Limited Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Assessment Report

JBC – AFB Building 700

North Charleston, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-16-292

Assessment Performed by and Report Prepared by:

James L. Killingsworth (SCDHEC Accreditation# ASB-20232) Date

Prepared for:

Glick Boehm and Associates

493 King Street, Suite 100

Charleston, SC 29403

Prepared by:

S&ME, Inc.

620 Wando Park Boulevard

Mt Pleasant, SC 29464

November 30, 2016

11/30/16

S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | f 843.881.6149 | www.smeinc.com

November 30, 2016

Glick Boehm and Associates

493 King Street, Suite 100

Charleston, South Carolina 29403

Attention: Mr. Shawn Mellin, AIA, LEED AP

Reference: Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report

Joint Base Charleston – AFB Building 700

Dear Mr. Mellin:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide the enclosed report detailing the limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of Building 700 located at the referenced site. The assessment was performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal 42-1600509 dated April 19, 2016 and the Design Work Order for

Project DKFX 11-1171 dated March 28, 2016. The enclosed report includes the executive summary, project background, assessment procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations for the proper treatment of asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint.

This report is provided for the sole use of Glick Boehm and Associates. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the specific areas referenced. The information provided in this assessment report should not be used as a bidding document, and field conditions should be verified.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene/environmental services. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (843) 884-0005.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

Terry W. Richburg James L. Killingsworth, CHMM

Environmental Group Leader Environmental Services Area Manager, V.P.

Attachments

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report

North Charleston, SC

November 30, 2016 ii

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Background

1.1 Asbestos Assessment

1.2 Lead-based Paint Assessment

2.0 Asbestos Assessment

2.1 Assessment Procedures

2.2 Findings and Results

2.3 Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key

3.0 Lead-Based Paint Assessment

3.1 Procedures

3.2 Findings

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

4.1 Asbestos Recommendations

4.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations

Appendices

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results ................................................................................................... i

Appendix II – Diagram of Confirmed ACM and Bulk Sample Locations ................................................. ii

Appendix III – Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License................................................................................ iii

Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Records .......................................... iv

Appendix V – Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings .......................................................................... v

November 30, 2016 1

Executive Summary

A asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on November 18, 2016 of Building 700 on

Joint Base Charleston, Air Force Base located in North Charleston, South Carolina, limited to areas that will be impacted by renovations activities. The purpose of the limited assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint associated with the planned renovations as detailed in the Design Work Order for Project DKFZ 11-1171 dated March 28, 2016. The assessment also complies with the federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of asbestos containing building materials that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

The building is an aircraft hangar totaling approximately 96,000 square feet in size. The building was constructed slab on grade and has exterior metal panels on a steel structural frame. The office and support areas are along the perimeter of the west side of the building. There are also two modular offices inside the hangar. Interior finishes include concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls, suspended ceiling systems, limited drywall ceilings, and various floor coverings.

Asbestos

The suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment included drywall and associated joint compound, floor tiles and associated mastics, ceiling tiles, mastic associated with rubber cove base, elbow/joint insulation on cold water lines, and various duct mastics. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, various ACMs were identified as summarized in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Summary of Confirmed ACMs

Material HA Location Asbestos

Type Percent Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

*Approx.

Quantity

Elbow/Joint Insulation on cold water lines

PE

West Hangar

Wall Chrysotile 8-10 G, F PD 20 each

*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.

Abbreviations:

HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear feet

G = good D = damaged NF = non-friable F = friable

LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for sig. disturbance

The identified asbestos containing elbow/joint insulation is classified as a friable ACM, in good condition, with a potential for disturbance due to the planned renovation activities. The remaining bulk samples analyzed did not exhibit the presence of asbestos.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control (SCDHEC) define materials as an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

November 30, 2016 2

Due to the planned renovation activities, we recommend proper removal and disposal of the identified

ACMs by a SCDHEC licensed asbestos abatement contractor, prior to any destructive activities that may disturb the ACMs, as required by the SCDHEC and the EPA. In accordance with the SCDHEC, onsite asbestos air monitoring, by a SCDHEC licensed Air Sampler, must be performed prior to, during and following the completion of friable abatement activities or activities rendering non-friable ACMs friable. If additional suspect ACMs, not identified in this report, are discovered during the planned renovation activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials. This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

Lead-based Paint Assessment

A lead-based paint assessment was performed of representative interior and exterior painted components, limited to the areas that will be impacted by the planned renovation activities. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology using a

Thermo Scientific XLp 302 (serial #25910). For the purpose of this assessment, painted surfaces with lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit (0.7 mg/cm2) are considered lead-based paint.

Of the representative suspect painted components tested, the following components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit of 0.7 mg/cm2 and are considered lead-based paint:

Wall Guards (metal; beige) at threshold of small Roll-up Door on West Side - Intact condition

The identified lead based paint was in good (intact) condition at the time of the assessment. The representative suspect painted components tested in other areas of the referenced building did not exhibit lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit. Additionally, detectable levels of lead were present which may be applicable to the standards of the Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.

The components possessing lead based paint which are scheduled to remain may be properly prepared/stabilized and repainted or the lead based paint may be removed by chemical treatment depending upon planned renovation goals. Component removal of the items containing lead-based paint requires disposal in a Class II or Class III lined landfill or those metal components may be recycled at an appropriately licensed facility.

Accumulations of paint waste (sludge, chips, dust, or flakes) and lead contaminated products must be tested by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) to determine if the waste is classified as hazardous, which requires disposal in a Subtitle C (hazardous waste) landfill. Lead waste, at a minimum, must be disposed in a Class II or III landfill.

Destructive actions to paint containing detectable levels of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in

Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

November 30, 2016 3

1.0 Background

S&ME was contracted by Glick Boehm and Associates to perform a limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of Building 700 at the Joint Base Charleston, Air Force Base located in North Charleston, South

Carolina. The assessment was subsequently performed on November 18, 2016. The assessment was requested to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint limited to the planned renovation areas described in the Design Work Order for Project DKFX 11-1171 dated

March 28, 2016. The assessment also complies with the federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of asbestos containing building materials that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

The building is an aircraft hangar totaling approximately 96,000 square feet in size. The building was constructed slab on grade and has exterior metal panels on a steel structural frame. The office and support areas are along the perimeter of the west side of the building. There are also two modular offices inside the hangar. Interior finishes include concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls, suspended ceiling systems, limited drywall ceilings, and various floor coverings.

1.1 Asbestos Assessment

The asbestos assessment was conducted to assess, sample, and identify ACMs that will be disturbed, in accordance with regulatory requirements. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations related to ACMs.

1.2 Lead-based Paint Assessment

The purpose of the testing was to assess and identify lead-based paint coatings associated with the referenced renovation project. The identification of these materials will aid in the compliance of occupational exposure (OSHA) and/or environmental releases of airborne lead dust in accordance with

OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) and provide information to determine proper disposal of lead-based paint coated components and debris in accordance with the SCDHEC and the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA).

2.0 Limited Asbestos Assessment

2.1 Assessment Procedures

The assessment was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs, limited to the project area.

Significant destructive testing was not performed, therefore the possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as inside pipe chases, wall voids, or flooring overlays. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.

November 30, 2016 4

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and EPA. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to EMSL Analytical of Charlotte, North Carolina and analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy

(PLM). Confirmation analysis was performed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for non-friable organically bound materials reported negative by PLM. The laboratory is accredited by the National

Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of

Standards and Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I

(1-1-87 edition), Part 763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics: morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors. The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Suspect non-friable organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with SCDHEC requirements.

2.2 Findings and Results

Based on the bulk sampling performed on November 18, 2016, as part of this limited assessment, the following ACMs were identified as summarized in Table 2 below:

Table 2: Summary of Confirmed ACMs

Material HA Location Asbestos

Type Percent Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

*Approx.

Quantity

Elbow/Joint Insulation on cold water lines

PE

West

Hangar

Wall

Chrysotile 8-10 G, F PD 20 each

*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.

Abbreviations:

HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear feet

G = good D = damaged NF = non-friable F = friable

LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for sig. disturbance

The EPA classifies ACMs into two categories; friable and non-friable. A friable material creates a greater health hazard due to the fact that it may be "crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act upon it in the course of demolition or renovation operations". The identified asbestos containing elbow/joint insulation is classified as a friable ACM, in good condition, with a potential for disturbance due to the planned renovation activities. The remaining bulk samples analyzed did not exhibit the presence of asbestos. The EPA and the SCDHEC define materials as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

November 30, 2016 5

A summary of asbestos results is provided in Appendix I, and exhibits the sample number, location, type of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and corresponding result for each sample. A diagram of the confirmed ACM and bulk sample locations are provided in Attachment II, and a copy of the inspector’s SCDHEC license is provided in Attachment III.

Copies of the laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Attachment IV.

2.3 Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key

In accordance with the EPA and SCDHEC, confirmed ACM is assigned a hazard assessment based on its present condition and potential for disturbance. The hazard assessment is used as a tool for prioritization in remedial actions regarding ACM(s) as noted in Appendix I, Table 3.

Present Condition

F = Friable

NF = Non-friable

G = Good (Very localized limited damage)

D = Damaged (Damage of less than 10% distributed and less than 25% localized)

SD = Significantly Damaged (Damage equal to or greater than 10% distributed, 25% localized)

Potential for Future Disturbance

LPD = Low Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, and Air Erosion all of Low Concern)

PD = Potential for Damage (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of Moderate Concern)

PSD = Potential for Significant Damage (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of High Concern)

Hazard Assessment

3.0 Lead-Based Paint Assessment

3.1 Procedures

Lead-based paint testing was performed on representative interior and exterior painted components associated with the planned renovation project area. The components were analyzed with a Thermo

Scientific XLp-302 XRF spectrum analyzer (serial #25910). Authorization for use of the XRF on the base was obtained by Major Scott King, Installation Radiation Safety Officer, as the XRF possesses a radioactive source. The suspect painted finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The possibility exists that lead-based paint

Significantly

Damaged

(SD)

Damaged

(D)

Good

(G)

PSD PD LPD PSD PD LPD

7 6 5 4 3 2 1

November 30, 2016 6 finishes are present in those inaccessible areas such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc. The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned activities.

The OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m3.

3.2 Findings

Based on the assessment and testing performed on November 18, 2016, of the painted components associated with the referenced renovation project area, the following components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 mg/cm2 and are considered lead-based paint:

Wall Guards (metal; beige) at threshold of small Roll-up Door on West Side - Intact condition

The identified lead-based paint coatings associated with the renovation project area was in intact condition at the time of the assessment. The remaining representative suspect painted components tested did not exhibit lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit. Additionally, detectable levels of lead were present which may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) depending upon the tasks impacting those painted surfaces.

The summary of XRF readings is provided in Appendix V, and should be reviewed in full.

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment performed on November 18, 2016 of Building 700 located at Joint Base Charleston, Air Force Base in North Charleston, South Carolina identified the presence of friable ACM, and lead-based paint applicable to SCDHEC and EPA disposal standards. Also, low levels of lead were identified that may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

4.1 Asbestos Recommendations

Due to the planned renovation of the structure, we recommend proper removal and disposal of the identified ACMs by a SCDHEC licensed asbestos abatement contractor. Onsite air monitoring, by a

SCDHEC licensed Air Sampler, must be performed prior to, during and following the completion of friable

(regulated) abatement activities. If additional suspect materials that are not included in this report will be disturbed during the destructive work activities, work impacting those suspect materials must cease and bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.

4.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations

Lead-based paint on the identified building components, as defined by the SCDHEC, requires proper handling and/or disposal if they are to be impacted by the renovation. In the case that the identified

November 30, 2016 7 lead-based paint on the wall guards are scheduled to remain they may be properly prepared/stabilized and repainted or the lead based paint may be removed by means of chemical treatment depending upon planned renovation goals. Component removal of the items containing lead-based paint requires disposal in a Class II or Class III lined landfill or metal components may be recycled at an appropriately licensed facility.

Accumulations of paint waste (sludge, chips, dust, or flakes) and lead contaminated products must be tested by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) to determine if the waste is classified as hazardous, which requires disposal in a Subtitle C (hazardous waste) landfill. Lead waste, at a minimum, must be disposed in a Class II or III landfill.

Destructive actions to paint containing detectable levels of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) may require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) depending upon the planned impacts to those subject paints. OSHA compliance may require training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results

S u m m a ry o f

A s b e s to s R e s u lt s

J B

C

A F

B B u ild in g

N o rt h

C h a rl e s to n

S o u th

C a ro lin a

S

M E

P ro je c t

N o

-1

-2

D a te o f S a m p lin g

N o v e m b e r

S a m p le N o

L o c a ti o n M a te ri a l A p p ro x

Q u a n ti ty

A s b e s to s

T y p e P e rc e n t C o n d it io n

P o te n ti a l fo r

D is tu rb a n c e

H a z a rd

A s s e s s m e n t

C B

M -1

C o o rd in a to r S h a c k

N D

A

N

A N

A

C B

M -2

C o o rd in a to r S h a c k

N

A N

A

C

B M

-3 C o o rd in a to r S h a c k

N

A N

A

C T

-1 F lig h t C h ie f O ff ic e

N

A N

A

C T

-2 F lig h t C h ie f O ff ic e

N A

N A

C T

-3 F lig h t C h ie f O ff ic e

N A

N A

C T

-4 B re a k ro o m

N A

N A

C T

-1

C o m m a n d

O ff ic e

N A

N A

C T

-2

C o m m a n d

O ff ic e

N

A N

A

C T

-3

C o m m a n d

O ff ic e

N

A N

A

C M

-1 C o m m a n d

O ff ic e a n d R e s e rv e

O ff ic e

N

A N

A

J E

-F T

-0

C o m m a n d

O ff ic e a n d R e s e rv e

O ff ic e

N

A N

A

J E

-F T

-0

C o m m a n d

O ff ic e a n d R e s e rv e

O ff ic e

N A

N A

J C

-1 F lig h t C h ie f O ff ic e

N A

N A

J C

-2 F lig h t C h ie f O ff ic e

N A

J C

-3 T o o l R o o m

N A

J C

-4 T o o l R o o m

N

A N

A

J C

-5 B re a k ro o m

N

A N

A

D M

-1 T o o l R o o m

N

A N

A

D M

-2 T o o l R o o m

N A

N A

D

M -3

T o o l R o o m

N

A N

A

S R

-1 T o o l R o o m

N

A N

A

S R

-2 T o o l R o o m

N A

N A

S R

-3 T o o l R o o m

N

A N

A

C T

-1

S u p e rv is io n

O ff ic e

N

A N

A

C T

-2

S u p e rv is io n

O ff ic e

N A

N A

C T

-3

S u p e rv is io n

O ff ic e

N

A N

A

T a b le

I

S u m m a ry o f

A s b e s to s R e s u lt s

M a s ti c a s s o c ia te d w it h r u b b e r c o v e b a s e

C e ili n g

T ile

' x

' s ti p p le d

C e ili n g

T ile

' x

' s o lid

S

F

C a rp e t

M a s ti c

S

F

L

F

,3

S F

D u c t

M a s ti c w h it e

,0

S

F

S h e e tr o c k

,0

S F

C e ili n g

T ile

' x

' r o u g h

S

F

J o in t

C o m p o u n d

,0

S

F o f m m a ry o f

A s b e s to s R e s u lt s

J B

C

A F

B B u ild in g

N o rt h

C h a rl e s to n

S o u th

C a ro lin a

S

M E

P ro je c t

N o

-1

-2

D a te o f S a m p lin g

N o v e m b e r

S a m p le N o

L o c a ti o n M a te ri a l A p p ro x

Q u a n ti ty

A s b e s to s

T y p e P e rc e n t C o n d it io n

P o te n ti a l fo r

D is tu rb a n c e

H a z a rd

A s s e s s m e n t

T a b le

I

S u m m a ry o f

A s b e s to s R e s u lt s

G D

M -1

M e n 's

R e s tr o o m

N

A N

A

G D

M -2

M e n 's

R e s tr o o m

N

A N

A

G

D M

-3 M e n

's R e s tr o o m

N

A N

A

G D

M -4

B o ile r

R o o m

N A

N A

P E

-1 H a n g a r W e s t W a ll

C h ry s o ti le

G

/F P

D

P E

-2 H a n g a r W e s t W a ll

C h ry s o ti le

G

/F P

D

P E

-3 H a n g a r W e s t W a ll

C h ry s o ti le

G /F

P D

A H

M -1

A H

U

W e s t

H a n g a r W a ll

N A

N A

A H

M -2

A H

U

W e s t

H a n g a r W a ll

N

A N

A

A

H M

-3 A

H U

W e s t

H a n g a r W a ll

N A

N A

C T

-1

M e n 's

R e s tr o o m

N

A N

A

C T

-2

M e n 's

R e s tr o o m

N A

N A

C T

-3

M e n 's

R e s tr o o m

N

A N

A

B R

-1 M e c h a n ic a l R o o m

N

A N

A

B R

-2 M e c h a n ic a l R o o m

N A

N A

B

R -3

M e c h a n ic a l R o o m

N

A N

A

N D

N o A s b e s to s D e te c te d

L P

D l o w p o te n ti a l fo r d is tu rb a n c e

F f ri a b le

N A

N o t

A p p lic a b le p o te n ti a l fo r d is tu rb a n c e

S F s q u a re f e e t

P S

D p o te n ti a l fo r s ig n if ic a n t d is tu rb a n c e

L F l in e a r fe e t

E

P A

S

C D

H E

C a n d

O S

H A d e fi n e s a m a te ri a l a s a s b e s to s c o n ta in in g i f a n a s b e s to s c o n te n t g re a te r th a n o n e p e rc e n t is d e te c te d i n a r e p re s e n ta ti v e s a m p le

Q u a n ti ti e s a re e s ti m a te d a n d s h o u ld n o t b e u s e d f o r b id d in g p u rp o s e s a s f ie ld c o n d it io n s s h o u ld b e v e ri fi e d

S a m p le s a n a ly z e d b y T

E M t o c o n fi rm n e g a ti v e r e s u lt s r e p o rt e d b y P

L M a n a ly s is

C e ili n g

T ile d e n s e

G g o o d

D d a m a g e d N

F n o n -f ri a b le

S D s ig n if ic a n tl y d a m a g e d

S

F

D u c t

M a s ti c g re e n

S F

P ip e /J o in t In s u la ti o n n

C ld W a te r L in e

E A

M a s ti c w h it e a n d

C lo th

H

U

,4

S

F

M a s ti c w h it e a n d c lo th c tw o rk

S

F o

Appendix II – Diagram of Confirmed ACM and Bulk Sample

Locations

D N

D N

D N

B O

I L

E R

O O

M

R o o m

M E

N

S

T R

O O

M

O F

F I C

E

B R

E A

K

R

O O

M

R o o m

W O

M E

N S

R E

S T

R O

O M

T O

O

M

C O

M M

A N

D

O F

F I C

E

F L

I G

H T

C H

I E

F

H A

N G

A R

R o o m

J E

T

S

H O

P

A S B

E S T O

S

C

O N

T A

I N

I N

G

M

A T E R

I A

L S

A S B

E S T O

S

C

O N

T A

I N

I N

G

E L B

O W

S J O

I N

T S

O

N

O D

C

O

W

T

I N

E S

A

P P

R O

X I M

A T E

Y

E A

C H

L E A

D B

A S

I N

T

W A

L L

G

U A

M

E T A

L

B

E I G

E

A

T

T H

R E S H

O

F

S M

A

L L U

P

D

O O

R

O

N

W

E S T

S I D

E

G D

M

G D

M

G D

M

J C

C T

S R

C B

M

J C

S R

C B

M

C B

M

J C

C M

A H

M

P E

S R

J C

C T

C T

C T

C M

C M

C T

J C

C T

C T

C T

P E

P E

A H

M

A H

M

B U

K

M P

L E

L O

C A

T I O

G

E

X

X

X

C T

C T

D M

D M

D M

C T

C T

C T

S I D

E

C

S I D

E

A

S I D

E

B

S I D

E

D

LL

L

S C

A L E

P R

O J E C

T

N

O

D R

A W

N

B

Y

D A

T E

A P

P R

O V

B

F I G

U R

E

N

O

Q:\drawings\4213\2016\292 Bldg 700\4213-16-292.dwg

L I M

I T

B

E S

T O

S

A

A

D B

A S

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

B U

I L

D I N

G

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R L E S T O

N

C

H A

R L E S T O

N

A

R C

E

B

A S E

C H

A R

L E S T O

N

S O

U T

R

O L I N

A

A S

S H

O W

N L A

J

T R

U E

P R

O J

0 0

JLK

Appendix III – Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License

Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of

Custody Records

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411609364EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SMEI51

Customer PO: 40609

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Jim Killingsworth (843) 884-0005

Fax:S&ME, Inc. (843) 881-6149

Received Date:620 Wando Park Boulevard 11/21/2016 9:20 AM

Analysis Date:Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 11/21/2016 - 11/22/2016

Collected Date: 11/18/2016

Project: 4213-16-292 Bldg. 700

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CM-1

411609364-0001

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Mastic

CM-2

411609364-0002

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

8%

92%

Gray/Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Mastic

GDM-1

411609364-0004

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

90%

Green

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Green Duct Mastic

GDM-2

411609364-0005

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

90%

Green

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Green Duct Mastic

GDM-3

411609364-0006

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Green Duct Mastic

CB-1

411609364-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Cove Base Mastic

Only

CB-2

411609364-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Cellulose<1%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Cove Base Mastic

Only

JC-1

411609364-0011

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound

JC-2

411609364-0012

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound

JC-3

411609364-0013

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound

JC-4

411609364-0014

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

60%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound

JC-5

411609364-0015

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

50%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound

SR-1

411609364-0016

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)93%Cellulose

Glass

5%

2%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sheetrock/ Drywall

SR-2

411609364-0017

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)94%Cellulose

Glass

5%

1%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sheetrock/ Drywall

SR-3

411609364-0018

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)96%Cellulose

Glass

3%

1%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sheetrock/ Drywall

BR-1

411609364-0019

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Wollastonite3%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Boiler Room Mastic

Initial report from: 11/22/2016 10:26:24

Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 11/22/2016 10:26 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411609364EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SMEI51

Customer PO: 40609

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

BR-2

411609364-0020

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)87%Cellulose

Wollastonite

10%

3%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Boiler Room Mastic

DM-1

411609364-0022

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

90%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Mastic (White)

DM-2

411609364-0023

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

95%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Mastic (White)

PE-1

411609364-0025

10% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)70%Min. Wool20%Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Pipe Elbow

PE-2

411609364-0026

10% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)70%Min. Wool20%Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Pipe Elbow

PE-3

411609364-0027

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass2%White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Pipe Elbow

AHM-1

411609364-0028

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

5%

84%

Cellulose

Glass

Wollastonite

3%

5%

3%

Gray/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Air Handler Mastic

AHM-2

411609364-0029

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)88%Cellulose

Glass

Wollastonite

5%

5%

2%

Gray/White/Silver

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Air Handler Mastic

CT-1

411609364-0031

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

20%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

10%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT-2

411609364-0032

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

20%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

10%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT-3

411609364-0033

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

70%

10%

White/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT1-1

411609364-0034

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

15%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

50%

25%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT1-2

411609364-0035

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

15%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

50%

25%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT1-3

411609364-0036

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

5%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

25%

60%

White/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT2-1

411609364-0037

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

15%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

50%

25%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT2-2

411609364-0038

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

15%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

50%

25%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT2-3

411609364-0039

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

30%

50%

White/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT3-1

411609364-0040

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)30%Min. Wool70%Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

CT3-2

411609364-0041

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)30%Min. Wool70%Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 11/22/2016 10:26 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

411609364EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SMEI51

Customer PO: 40609

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CT3-3

411609364-0042

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)15%Min. Wool85%Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile

Analyst(s)

Aaron Hartley (14)

Kyle Collins (22)

Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312

Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008 - 1.71 Printed: 11/22/2016 10:26 AM

Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 http://www.EMSL.com / charlottelab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 411609364

Customer ID: SMEI51

Customer PO: 40609

Project ID:

Attention: Jim Killingsworth Phone: (843) 884-0005

S&ME, Inc. Fax: (843) 881-6149

620 Wando Park Boulevard Received Date: 11/21/2016 9:20 AM

Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Analysis Date: 11/22/2016

Collected Date: 11/18/2016

4213-16-292 Bldg. 700Project:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via

EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types

CM-3

411609364-0003

Carpet Mastic Tan

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

GDM-4

411609364-0007

Green Duct Mastic Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

CB-3

411609364-0010

Cove Base Mastic Only Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

BR-3

411609364-0021

Boiler Room Mastic White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

DM-3

411609364-0024

Duct Mastic (White) White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

AHM-3

411609364-0030

Air Handler Mastic Beige

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

100 None No Asbestos Detected

Analyst(s)

Derrick Young (6) Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC

Initial report from: 11/22/2016 14:10:56

ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012 Printed 11/22/2016 2:10:59PM Page 1 of 1

OrderID: 411609364

Appendix V – Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings

SU

M A

R Y

O F

X R

F

SP

EC

TR

U M

L

EA

D A

N A

LY

ZE

R R

EA

D

IN

G

S

JB

C

A

FB

B

U

IL

D

IN

G

N O

R

TH

C H

A R

LE

ST

O N

, S O

U

TH

C A

R O

LI

N

A

S& M

E P

R O

JE

C

T N

O . 4

-1

-2

D A

TE

O

F

TE

ST

IN

G : 1

-1

-1

LN

Si te Fl o o r Si d e

R o o m

St ru ct re m p o n e n t C o lo r Su b st ra te

C o n d it io n R e su lt s

A ct io n

Le ve l Le ad U n it s

Sh u tt er C al

.8 m g/ cm

C al ib ra te

.7 m g/ cm

C al ib ra te

.8 m g/ cm

C al ib ra te

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D Ex te ri o r

W al l W al l

B ei ge n cr et e

P ee lin g

N eg at iv e

.7

.0 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D Ex te ri o r

W al l W al l

B n cr et e

P ee lin g

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D Ex te ri o r

W al l W al l

B n cr et e

P ee lin g

N eg at iv e

.7 -0

.0 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D Ex te ri o r

W al l D o w n sp o u t B n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D Ex te ri o r

W al l D o w n sp o u t B n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

Ex te ri o r W al l

D o w n sp o u t

B n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

Ex te ri o r W al l

D o w n sp o u t

B n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

Ex te ri o r R o llu p D o o r W a ll

G u a rd

B ei g e

M et a l

In ta ct P o si ti ve

.7

.4 m g

/c m

B u ild in g

D

Ex te ri o r R o llu p D o o r W a ll

G u a rd

B ei g e

M et a l

In ta ct P o si ti ve

.7

.7 m g

/c m

B u ild in g

D

Ex te ri o r R o llu p d o o r P an el

/F ra m e

B la ck M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

M en s R

R W al l

W al l G re y

C o n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

M en s R

R D o o r D o o r B la ck

M et al In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

M en

R R

D o o r

C as in g

B la ck M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

B re ak R m W al l

W al l G re y

C o n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

C

B re ak R m W al l

Tr im

B la ck W o o d In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

La d ie s

R m

D o o r

D o o r

B la ck M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

La d ie s

R m

D o o r

C as in g

B la ck M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

H an ga r

W al l W al l

W h it e

C o n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7

.0 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

To o l R o o m

D o o r

D o o r

B la ck M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

To o l R o o m

D o o r

C as in g

B la ck M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

To o l R o o m

Fl o o r

Fl o o r

G re y C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

Fl ig h t

O ff ic e

W al l W al l

G re y G yp su m In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

Fl ig h t

O ff ic e

D o o r

D o o r

G re y M et al

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm o

M A

R Y

O F

X R

F

SP

EC

TR

U M

L

EA

D A

N A

LY

ZE

R R

EA

D

IN

G

S

JB

C

A

FB

B

U

IL

D

IN

G

N O

R

TH

C H

A R

LE

ST

O N

, S O

U

TH

C A

R O

LI

N

A

S& M

E P

R O

JE

C

T N

O . 4

-1

-2

D A

TE

O

F

TE

ST

IN

G : 1

-1

Si te Fl o o r Si d e

R o o m

St ru ct m p o n e n t C o lo r Su b st ra te

C o n d it io n R e su lt s

A ct io n

Le ve l Le ad U n it s

B u ild in g

C

H an ga r

Fl o o r

Fl o o r

G re y C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

A

H an ga r

Fl o o r

Fl o o r

G re y C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

H an ga r

Fl o o r

Fl o o r

G re y C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

C

H an ga r

Fl o o r

Fl o o r

G re y C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

H an ga r

Fl o o r

Fl o o r

G re y C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

C

H an ga r

Fl o o r

St ri p e

Ye llo w C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

B

H an ga r

Fl o o r

St ri p e

Ye llo w C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

H an ga r

Fl o o r

St ri p e

R ed

C o n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

H an ga r

Fl o o r

St ri p e

R ed

C o n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

H an ga r

Fl o o r

St ri p e

Ye llo w C o n cr et e In ta ct

N eg at iv e

.7

.0 m g/ cm

B u ild in g

D

H an ga r

Fl o o r

St ri p e

R ed

C o n cr et e

In ta ct N eg at iv e

.7

.0 m g/ cm

C al ib ra te

.8 m g/ cm

C al ib ra te

.8 m g/ cm

C al ib ra te

.7 m g/ cm m g

/c m m ill ig ra m p e r s q u a re c e n ti m e te r

S C

D H

E C r e q u ir e s s p e c ia l d is p o s a l fo r p a in t c o n ta in in g l e a d

.7 m g /c m

O S

H A d o e s n o t re c o g n iz e a c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f le a d f o r d e fi n it io n p u rp o s e s o n ly t h e a ir b o rn e c o n c e n tr a ti o n a w o rk e r is e x p o s e d

B o ld

P a in t

R e a d in g s m e e ti n g o r e x c e e d in g

S C

D H

E C d is p o s a l le v e l o f

.7 m g /c

S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | f 843.881.6149 | www.smeinc.com

August 23, 2017

Glick Boehm and Associates

493 King Street, Suite 100

Charleston, South Carolina 29403

Attention: Mr. Shawn Mellin, AIA, LEED AP mellin@glickboehm.com

Reference: Supplemental Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Testing Report

Joint Base Charleston – AFB Building 700

Dear Mr. Mellin:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide this report summarizing the supplemental asbestos and lead-based paint testing we performed on August 17, 2017, limited to the exterior of the referenced structure.

Our services were performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 42-1600509 dated April 19, 2016. The following sections include the project background, sampling and analysis procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations.

Project Background

On August 10, 2017, you contacted Jim Killingsworth via email and requested a proposal for supplemental asbestos and lead-based paint testing, limited to the exterior of Building 700 to support planned renovations. On February 8, 2017, Jim Killingsworth and Bill Seaborn (S&ME) performed the referenced testing. As requested, the assessment did not include the interior of the structure. The purpose of the assessment was to assess, identify, and provide recommendations to properly treat asbestos containing materials (ACMs) associated with the interior of the subject unit, to prevent worker exposures, emissions and properly dispose of the subject materials.

The structure located at Joint Base Charleston – Air Force Base is a hanger, approximately 93,000 square feet in size. The subject unit is used as a repair hanger for C-17 aircraft. The exterior finishes are comprised of metal and concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls with a sloped metal roof. The structure was occupied on the day of our site visit.

Procedures

Asbestos

A sampling…