Attachment 4 - Cathodic Protection AF Form 813 - 23 May 24.pdf

REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Report Control Symbol (RCS):

BAFB 2024-019

INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function. Continue on separate sheets as necessary. Reference appropriate item number(s).

SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION

1. TO (Environmental Planning Function)

9 CES/CEIE

2. FROM (Proponent organization and functional address symbol) Air Force - Beale Air Force Base, CA

2a. TELEPHONE NO.

530-634-0642

3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION

Repair Well Field Cathodic Protection

4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (Identify decision to be made and need date)

1. State the purpose of this action.

Provide cathodic protection (CP) system for wells 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 to protect the well casings from corrosion and degradation.

2. State the need for this action.

Action is needed because the existing CP system is not functioning. According to 49 CFR part 192, "All corrosion protection systems must be operated and maintained to continuously provide protection to the metal components of that portion of the tank and piping that routinely contain regulated substances and are in contact with the ground." According to UFC 3-570-06 O&M: Cathodic Protection Systems requirements, well casings must have a properly functioning corrosion protection system.

3. What do you intend to accomplish and why is the action necessary?

The intent is to protect the well cassings from corosion and rusting by Installing the CP system for wells 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9. The system will keep the wells functioning for a long duration wich will save significant time and well replacement cost.

4. What is currently being done to meet the need?

The current CP system to Wells 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 connected through an abandoned underground metal pipe is disconnected due to broken (over the surface) testing equipment and unknow faults. Wells 8 and 9 were also disconnected from the system due to removal of overhead bonding wires while demoing the overhead electrical system in 2023.

The CP system currently in place has deteriorated past its end-of-life, disconnected, and no longer provides utility, therefore not meeting the need.

5. Provide any additional details related to the Purpose and Need for Action.

Previously, the CP bonding wire for wells 8 and 9 was extended together with the overhead electrical distribution lines. The electrical overhead system was removed and replaced to underground; thus, the CP bonding wire was also removed and disconnected.

Five other wells were assumed connected using the underground abandoned metal water supply pipe as a bonding conductor for CP.

However, final testing reports showed disconnection of CP for these five wells.

Need Date: 05/15/2024

5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES (DOPAA) (Provide sufficient details for evaluation of the total action.)

1. What other alternatives have been considered (to include the no action alternative)?

Alternative 1: Provide shallow anode CP system separately for all wells including 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9. Possible required depth for the anode beds installation would be 5-50 ft. Trenching to install wires and connect the anode bed to the rectifier would be approx. 3-4 ft wide and 2-3 ft depth. Trenching for cables would be on existing gravel roads and within the fenced area around the wells shown on the attached map — digging must not exceed 4-5 ft deep or 3-4 ft wide.

No Action alternative: No action would not provide CP to the wells and they would be allowed to continue deteriorating, ultimately leading to failure and non-function of the wells.

2. What alternatives were eliminated from consideration and why?

Provide a single source anode bed and reconnect wells 1,2,4,5, and 6 through the existing underground metal pipe and connect well 8, and 9 by placing the bonding wire through the existing underground AC pipe. This alternative was ultimately eliminated because it would've required digging within sensitive environmental areas, a longer timeline for mitigation, and would've increased the cost.

5/23/24, 12:03 PM AF FORM 813

about:blank 1/8

3. Please provide a description of the construction action and timing when it will occur.

Part- I: Provide a single source shallow anode bed as required to cathodically protect wells 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 from corrosion. Anode bed would be installed minimum 300ft away from the well heads. Possible required depth for the anode bed installation would be 5-50 ft.

Trenching to install wires and connect the anode bed to the rectifier at 2-3 ft depth and 3-4 ft width. Installation of single source anode bed would require approximately 200-300 SF. Rectifier, bonding wires, patches, test stations, and all relative equipment and tools must be installed according to the standard criteria and specifications referenced in the SON.

Part - II: Provide shallow anode CP system separately for wells 8 and 9. Possible required depth for the anode bed installation would be 5- 50 ft. Trenching to install wires and connect the anode bed to the rectifier at 2-3 ft depth and 3-4 ft width. Trenching for cables would be on the gravel roads and within the fenced area around the wells shown on the map — digging must not exceed 4-5 ft deep or 3-4 ft wide.

Design and construction are anticipated to complete within 90 days.

4. Describe the project location. Attach map(s)/diagram(s) – make sure to include an overview map of where your requested project area is on the installation.

Well Fields, Beale Air Force Base, CA Maps are provided and attached.

5. Describe additional project requirements: 1) Construction and site preparation requirements (include approx. area of ground to be disturbed); 2) Does the project require a laydown yard or storage area? If so, describe the location and groundwork required.

1)

• Drilling spots for bore holes 5-50 ft deep for installation of individual anode bed,

• 200-300 squere foot area up to 5 ft deep. (possibly 100 ft long trenching on the gravel road area) for a single source anode bed installation

• Trenching 2-3 ft wide and 3-4 ft deep for wire connections to rectifier of each well is needed. (this trenching also can occur on the gravel road surfaces).

2) Laydown area could be provided on nearby hardened road surfaces.

6. Describe additional project requirements: 3) Will soil boring/sampling/potholing occur during a design phase? If so, a separate dig permit will be required; 4) Detailed operational activities; 5) Equipment/material lists.

3) Potholing and soil sampling will be required during the design phase, a dig permit will be provided.

4) The operational activities would be the same as the current CP system (currently disconnected).

5) Backhoe, dump truck, personal vehicles (trucks), and electrical workign tools and equipment.

7. Will the project require utilities? How will those utilities be provided to the facility?

No

8. Provide any additional details related to the Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives.

Map Attachments:

CathodicProtection [Site Maps].pdf

6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) Ahmad Shir DOD - shir.ahmad

6a. SIGNATURE //Ahmad Shir DOD - shir.ahmad i:0e.t|fedvis|shir.ahmad//

6b. DATE 05/08/2024

SECTION II - PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY (Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; 0 = no effect; - = adverse effect; U = unknown effect)

+ 0 - U

7. AIR INSTALLATION COMPATIBLE LAND USE/ZONE USE (Noise, accident potential, encroachment, etc.)

X

8. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, Attainment status, state implementation plan, etc.) X

9. WATER RESOURCES (Drinking water, wastewater, quality, quantity, source, water features, etc.) X

10. SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (Asbestos/lead-based paint/radiation/chemical exposure, X

5/23/24, 12:03 PM AF FORM 813

about:blank 2/8 https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/USAFNEPA/Attachments/1715207765456/CathodicProtection%20[Site%20Maps].pdf explosives safety quantity distance, bird/wildlife aircraft hazard, etc.)

11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, toxic materials, etc.) X

12. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodplains, threatened or endangered species, etc.) X

13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Burial sites, archaeological, historical, etc.) X

14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal, Installation Restoration Program, seismicity, etc.)

X

15. SOCIOECONOMIC (Employment/population projections, school and local fiscal impacts, etc.) X

16. OTHER (Potential impacts not addressed above, such as Host Nation considerations/concerns for non-US locations.)

X

SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

17. PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CATEX) #A2.3.12. ; OR

PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CATEX; FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.

18. REMARKS

Secondary CATEX selections: A2.3.14.

Categorical exclusion (CATEX) A2.3.12. is applied: "Installing, operating, modifying, and routinely repairing and replacing utility and communications systems, data processing cable, and similar electronic equipment that use existing rights of way, easements, distribution systems, or facilities.” Additionally, CATEX A2.3.14. is applicable: “Installing on previously developed land, equipment that does not substantially alter land use (i.e., land use of more than one acre).” None of the unique circumstances that preclude the assignment of a CATEX are known to be present at this time (32 CFR 989 A.2.2). An AF Form 103 is required 30 calendar days before construction begins.

Refer to the attached required Beale Environmental Specifications. Note that there are specific requirements for all media areas that must be included in the awarded contract and/or project design.

Implementation and/or maintenance of this project will require consultation with USFWS if any digging (e.g., trenching or annode bed) is deeper than 6 ft, or if all project activities (including vehicles and equipment) cannot be maintained on hardened (gravel or paved) surfaces or separated from sensitive habitats by hardened surfaces (see footprints provided in SOW).

Implementation of this project shall comply with the Conservation Measures outlined in the 2019 Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan (Appendix V).

19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING

FUNCTION CERTIFICATION (Name and Grade) Robinson, Michael GS-13

19a. SIGNATURE //Robinson Michael D DOD CIV - michael.d.robinson7 i:0e.t|fedvis|michael.d.robinson7//

19b. DATE 05/23/2024

AF IMT 813, 199990901, V1 THIS FORM CONSOLIDATES AF FORMS 813 AND 814.

PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF BOTH FORMS ARE OBSOLETE.

about:blank 3/8

CONTINUATION SHEET

Review Comments:

AICUZ/Land Use (05/09/2024 - Risse Chantz DOD CIV - chantz.p.risse)

From previous review (02/23/2023 - Williams Anissa DOD - anissa.f.williams):

1. Will the Project produce excessive noise?

No.

2. Are there any sensitive receptors within the increased noise zones?

No.

3. Will the effects of the Project require changes to the surrounding land use outside the installation boundaries?

No.

4. Will the Project increase the potential for encroachment concerns?

No.

5. Will installation airspace, range, military training route airspace, special use airspace or uncontrolled airspace be affected and/or requiremodification?

No.

Safety and Occupational Health (05/09/2024 - Risse Chantz DOD CIV - chantz.p.risse)

From previous review (02/23/2023 - Middleton James DOD - james.a.middleton2):

Approved.

Water Resources (05/09/2024 - Risse Chantz DOD CIV - chantz.p.risse)

From previous review: 02/23/2023 - Avery Joshua DOD - joshua.c.avery):

1. Will a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), or HN equivalent, permit be required?

No

2. Would the Project require permitting to discharge effluents into an existing body of water?

No, but the project will need to comply with the General Conditions of a "non-notifying" Nationwide-3 permit for maintenance.

(PermitSummary with General Conditions attached)

3. Would the Project impact any existing body of water, floodplain or jurisdictional wetland?

Potentially. There is potential for impact to WoTUS, but impacts are not likely to be significant.

4. Are there downstream sedimentation or storm water-born pollution issues that may be impacted by implementing the Project?

No

5. Will the Project comply with the installation’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan or require a modification?

Will Comply; No modifications required.

6. Does the installation drain to an impaired water body and would the Project have the potential to create excessive runoff,sedimentation, and/or erosion as a result of implementing the Project?

about:blank 4/8

No

7. Would the Project have the potential to adversely affect/require mods or substantial changes to installation or communitygroundwater, wastewater, storm water or other natural or manmade water systems to accommodate regulated wastewater pollutants?

No

8. Does the installation lack sustainable and adequate potable and process water supplies to support the Project?

No

The proposed action meets requirements.

AFCEC Restoration (05/09/2024 - Risse Chantz DOD CIV - chantz.p.risse) From previous review (02/27/2023 - Rector Darren DOD CIV - darren.w.rector):

1. Would the Project require CERCLA removals or similar actions under RCRA or other authorities?

No.

2. Will there be any existing permits, new or modified permits, manifests, responsible authorities or agencies, contacts, etc., required as aresult of implementing the Project for RCRA, CERCLA, TSCA or UIC regulations?

No.

Hazardous Materials/Waste (05/09/2024 - Risse Chantz DOD CIV - chantz.p.risse)

From previous review (03/02/2023 - Maresh Eric DOD CIV - eric.g.maresh):

HAZARDOUS AND UNIVERSAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

The contractor must properly identify, accumulate, ship and dispose all hazardous and universal waste generated. All hazardous anduniversal waste identification, accumulation, shipping and disposal must abide with Federal, State and Department of Defense regulationsas specified by:

• The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (40 CFR 260-282) sets Federal standards for hazardous and universal waste management.

• CA Code of Regulations - Title 22 Social Security; Division 4.5 Environmental Health Standards for the Management of Hazardous Waste.

• Department of Defense rules and policies regarding hazardous and universal waste are summarized in the Beale Air Force BaseHazardous Waste Management Plan (available at the Beale AFB 9 CES/CEIE Environmental Office or at the following website:https://beale.eim.acc.af.mil/9rw/plans_programs/plans/9%20RW%20Plans%20Finalized/Forms/AllItems.aspx).

HAZARDOUS AND UNIVERSAL WASTE IDENTIFICATION

Proper identification of hazardous and universal waste is the responsibility of the contractor during all waste generation processes.

Thecontractor is responsible for determining if a waste is hazardous or not hazardous by expediently complying with hazardous waste anduniversal identification regulations; Federal (40 CFR 261) and California State (CCR Title 22; Division 4.5; Chapter 11). Results fromhazardous and non-hazardous waste identifications and determinations (analysis results and characterization documents) shall be sharedwith 9 CES/CEIE. Profile documents for hazardous and non-hazardous wastes shall be approved by 9 CES/CEIE. Chemical analysis ofhazardous wastes must be performed by a California Department of Public Health Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Programcertified laboratory.

Examples of processes which generally produce hazardous and universal wastes may include, but are not limited to: paint removal, mediablasting, chemical waste removal, thinner activities, contaminated petroleum activities, demolition, battery removal, lamp removal,electronic waste removal, contaminated equipment/item removal, power transformer removal, treated wood removal and contaminatedsoil removal.

HAZARDOUS AND UNIVERSAL WASTE ACCUMULATION

Proper accumulation of hazardous and universal waste is the responsibility of the contractor. Accumulations of hazardous and universalwaste shall be identified to 9 CES/CEIE within one day of the start of accumulation. Contractors must comply with hazardous and universalwaste accumulation regulations; Federal (40 CFR 262, 273, 279) and California State (CCR Title 22; Division 4.5; Chapters 12, 23, 29, 32, 34,42, 43). Storage (containers, tanks or other storage devices) and labeling of hazardous and universal wastes must be in accordance with40 CFR 262; subpart C and CCR Title 22; Division 4.5; Chapters 12; Article 3.

At completion of work, the contractor shall not leave hazardous wastes or non-waste chemicals at worksite. All non-waste chemicals shallbe retained by the contractor at completion of work.

about:blank 5/8

PCB CONTAMINATED HAZARDOUS WASTES (SUSPECTED OR KNOWN)

• Oil Filled Transformer Disposition - Any waste transformer or electrical equipment (switches, capacitors, etc) which contain insulatingliquid shall be tested by the contractor for PCBs prior to disposition. Results of PCB analysis shall be shared with 9 CES/CEIE.

Equipmentcaps, covers, etc. must be properly secured to prevent spills. Leaking transformers and equipment must be immediately contained. 9CES/CEIE must be notified immediately of leaking transformers or equipment. Sealed transformers or equipment may not need samplingif manufacturer data verifies PCB content (9 CES/CEIE shall concur with manufacturer data prior to disposal).

• Disposal of PCB contaminated ballasts - Ballasts without a “NO PCB” sticker must be assumed to be hazardous waste upon disposal.Manufacturer data may be used to prove non-presence of PCB’s for ballasts. All ballasts shall be separated as to “PCB” and “No

PCB.”

ACCUMULATION AND DISPOSAL OF TREATED WOOD WASTE (TWW)

TWW must be identified, accumulated, labeled and stored according to California hazardous waste regulations (CCR Title 22; Division 4.5;Chapter 34). Accumulation locations and accumulation start dates for TWW must immediately be coordinated with 9 CES/CEIE.

TWWaccumulations must be properly labeled in accordance with California TWW regulations. Disposal of TWW must be coordinated with 9CES/CEIE. Copies of landfill weight tickets must be sent to 9 CES/CEIE.

TWW must be stored off the exposed ground by placing it on blocks, on concrete surfaces or in containers. Do not store TWW beyondallowed limits (90 days – block and tarp, 180 days – containment pad, 1 year – container and storage building). Cover TWW duringinclement weather to prevent rain water from leaching chemicals out of the TWW. Sawdust from cutting TWW must be collected andmanaged as TWW. Accumulate TWW away from public access. Contact 9 CES/CEIE if planning to reuse the removed TWW. Keep TWWfrom mixing with other waste. Label all TWW bundle/shipments with the following information.

TREATED WOOD WASTE – Do not burn or scavenge.

TWW Handler Name:________________________ Address:_______________________ Accumulation Date:_____________

HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPPING AND DISPOSAL (BEALE AFB)

All hazardous and non-hazardous waste shipments from Beale AFB must be coordinated through 9 CES/CEIE. These shipments includehazardous waste manifests, non-hazardous waste manifests and bill of lading waste shipments. The contractor shall submit a waste profile(identification document) to 9 CES/CEIE for all wastes generated, before removal from Beale AFB. At least two working days prior totransporting wastes from Beale AFB, the contractor shall make an appointment to deliver all hazardous waste manifests to 9 CES/CEIE forreview. Hazardous and non-hazardous waste to be shipped off site shall be inspected by 9 CES/CEIE before leaving Beale AFB. Thecontractor shall provide the properly completed shipping document to:

9 CES/CEIE

6425 B Street Beale AFB CA 95903-1708

EPA ID # CA7570024508

9 CES/CEIE shall sign all hazardous and non-hazardous waste shipping documents leaving Beale AFB.

Air Quality (05/15/2024 - Stewart Susan DOD - susan.b.stewart)

1. Will the Project create criteria pollutant and/or hazardous air pollutant emissions during construction and or operations?

Neutral effect. Proposed actions would result in no emission increase or an increase in emissions that is clearly de minimis.

2. Will implementation of the Project require the issuance of a new or modified air permit?

No. Project will not require the issuance of a new or modified air permit.

3. Has the Project been analyzed in Air Conformity Applicability Model (ACAM)? Attach the ACAM report.

Yes. Project has been analyzed in ACAM. ACAM report is attached.

4. Will the Project include source(s) that may be classified as a New Source or a major modification of an existing source?

No. Proposed action will not include source(s) that may be classified as a New Source or a major modification of an existing source.

5. Will mitigation, emissions control devices and/or other management practices be required to minimize or eliminate effects to the region’s air quality condition with regard to attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)?

about:blank 6/8

Project proponents and project Contractors shall adhere to 813 & 103 work clearance Air Quality best management practices throughout duration of project.

*Minimize nuisance dust emissions

*Air Quality (FRAQMD compliance): The contractor/shop shall comply with the Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) Standard Mitigation Measures for All Projects, Indirect Source Review Guidelines, and Fugitive Dust Control Mitigation Measures during construction to minimize construction related air quality impacts. Reference: FRAQMD requirements at https://www.fraqmd.org/ceqa-planning

*All abrasive blasting shall be performed under permit issued by applicable air quality regulatory agency (FRAQMD) and all abrasive blasting shall be performed/conducted in a manner complying with Title 17 CCR, Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 6. Contractor shall obtain abrasive blasting permit prior to performing blasting work and comply with air quality rules/regulations. Contractor shall only use abrasive blasting media certified for use by California’s Air Resources Board (See section 92530 Certified Abrasives of Subchapter 6, Chapter 1, Division 3 of Title 17)

*Any portable equipment, having a 50 bhp engine or more, brought onto Beale AFB property shall be registered under California Air Resources Board (CARB) Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP). PERP Registration numbers must be provided to 9 CES/CEIE Air Quality Manager (530-634-2844) within three (3) business days of arriving on Beale property. Portable equipment includes, but not limited to, air compressors, generators, concrete pumps, tub grinders, wood chippers, water pumps, drill rigs, pile drivers, rock drills, abrasive blasters, aggregate screening and crushing plants, and concrete batch plants.

*Air Quality (Title 13 CCR): In accordance with Title 13 CCR, Section 2485, all diesel-fueled commercial vehicles operating in the State of California with a gross vehicular weight of greater than 10,000 lbs. and are or must be licensed to operate on highways shall not be idled for greater than five (5) minutes at any location. See Title 13 CCR, Section 2485, Subsection (d) for exceptions.

Natural Resources (05/15/2024 - Rose Eli DOD - eli.t.rose) Implementation of this project would not impact caves, faults, geothermic vents, mineral resources or any other geologic features.

Biological Resources (05/15/2024 - Rose Eli DOD - eli.t.rose) This project is in the vicinity of sensitive, candidate, or listed species and/or their habitats.

Implementation and/or maintenance of this project will require consultation with USFWS if any digging (e.g., trenching or annode bed) is deeper than 6 ft, or if all project activities (including vehicles and equipment) cannot be maintained on hardened (gravel or paved) surfaces or separated from sensitive habitats by hardened surfaces (see footprints provided in SOW).

Implementation of this project shall comply with the Conservation Measures outlined in the 2019 Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan (Appendix V).

Cultural Resources (05/15/2024 - Gallentine Tamara DOD - tamara.a.gallentine)

1. Does the Project involve ground disturbance, construction, demolition or other effects that may impact significant historic buildings or structures, or does it create noise, dust, odors, light, or other disturbances to the existing cultural environment? Negative

2. Are the cultural areas of concern subject to potential impacts within the boundaries of the Project? Negative; access routes will need to be designated.

3. Are there Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) or Programmatic Agreements (PA) in affect within the areas of concern? Negative

4. Will identified historic properties be potentially impacted by the Project? Negative, access routes will need to be identified

5. Are there any historic properties (i.e. archaeological sites or buildings/structures/districts eligible for the National Register) that may be impacted by the Project? Negative, access routes will need to be coordinated and designated.

Legal (05/22/2024 - Wright William M DOD - william.m.wright) The proposed action meets requirements.

I have conducted a review of the proposed action and the associated categorical exclusions (CATEX) A2.3.12 and A2.3.14. I find that both the proposed action and the identified CATEXs are appropriate for the following reasons:

Proposed Action: Repair well field cathodic protection which would include providing shallow anode CP system separately for all wells about:blank 7/8 including 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9.

CATEX A2.3.12: This categorical exclusion applies as the proposed action involves installing, operating, modifying, and routinely repairing and replacing utility and communications systems, data processing cables, and similar electronic equipment. Importantly, these activities utilize existing rights of way, easements, distribution systems, or facilities, aligning with the criteria outlined in the CATEX.

CATEX A2.3.14: The proposed action also falls within the scope of this categorical exclusion as it involves installing equipment on previously developed land that does not substantially alter land use. This aligns with the intent of the CATEX to streamline the environmental review process for activities that have minimal environmental impact.

Based on this assessment, I believe that the proposed action complies with the relevant categorical exclusions and is therefore appropriate for implementation. I am happy to discuss this action further if you all have any additional questions or considerations.

Attachments:

ACAM ROCA_Repair Well Field CP.docx 2019 Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan (Appendix V).pdf Final Beale Environmental Specifications [Dec 2023].pdf

5/23/24, 12:03 PM AF FORM 813

about:blank 8/8 https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/USAFNEPA/Attachments/1715207765456/ACAM%20ROCA_Repair%20Well%20Field%20CP.docx https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/USAFNEPA/Attachments/1715207765456/2019%20Integrated%20Natural%20Resource%20Management%20Plan%20(Appendix%20V).pdf https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/USAFNEPA/Attachments/1715207765456/Final%20Beale%20Environmental%20Specifications%20[Dec%202023].pdf

0 750 1,500375 Feet

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Overview Map

1:8,625Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

!( Well Location

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

UV65

UV20

N Beale Rd

Patrol Road

0 100 20050 Feet

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #1

1:1,070Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

UV65

UV20

N Beale Rd

0 50 10025

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #2

1:454Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

UV65

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #4

1:454Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #5

1:454Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #6

1:454Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #8

1:454Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

Prepared By:

Brett Gelinas

CSU-CEMML GIS Analyst brett.gelinas@colostate.edu Last Save Date: 6/15/2023

Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N Map created for presentation purposes only. Although efforts have been made to verify data, accuracy cannot be guaranteed

Beale Air Force Base

Cathodic Protection Project Area Well #9

1:454Scale:

CONTROLLED BY CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF MILITARY LANDS & AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL GIS PROGRAM OFFICE

Wetlands

Proposed Project Area

Base Boundary

Legend

Locator Map

AIR CONFORMITY APPLICABILITY MODEL REPORT

RECORD OF CONFORMITY ANALYSIS (ROCA)

1. General Information: The Air Force’s Air Conformity Applicability Model (ACAM) was used to perform a net change in emissions analysis to assess the potential air quality impact/s associated with the action. The analysis was performed in accordance with the Air Force Manual 32-7002, Environmental Compliance and Pollution Prevention; the Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP, 32 CFR 989); the General Conformity Rule (GCR, 40 CFR 93 Subpart B); and the USAF Air Quality Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) Guide. This report provides a summary of the ACAM analysis.

Report generated with ACAM version: 5.0.23a

a. Action Location:

Base: BEALE AFB State: California County(s): Yuba Regulatory Area(s): Yuba City-Marysville, CA; NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

b. Action Title: Repair Well Field Cathodic Protection

c. Project Number/s (if applicable):

d. Projected Action Start Date: 6 / 2024

e. Action Description:

Alternative 1: Provide shallow anode CP system separately for all wells including 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9.

Possible required depth for the anode beds installation would be 5-50 ft. Trenching to install wires and connect the anode bed to the rectifier would be approx. 3-4 ft wide and 2-3 ft depth. Trenching for cables would be on existing gravel roads and within the fenced area around the wells shown on the attached map — digging must not exceed 4-5 ft deep or 3-4 ft wide.

No Action alternative: No action would not provide CP to the wells and they would be allowed to continue deteriorating, ultimately leading to failure and non-function of the wells.

Alternatives eliminated from consideration is providing a single source anode bed and reconnect wells 1,2,4,5, and 6 through the existing underground metal pipe and connect well 8, and 9 by placing the bonding wire through the existing underground AC pipe. This alternative was ultimately eliminated because it would've required digging within sensitive environmental areas, a longer timeline for mitigation, and would've increased the cost.

Description of the construction action and timing includes:

Part- I: Provide a single source shallow anode bed as required to cathodically protect wells 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 from corrosion. Anode bed would be installed minimum 300ft away from the well heads. Possible required depth for the anode bed installation would be 5-50 ft. Trenching to install wires and connect the anode bed to the rectifier at 2-3 ft depth and 3-4 ft width. Installation of single source anode bed would require approximately 200-300 SF. Rectifier, bonding wires, patches, test stations, and all relative equipment and tools must be installed according to the standard criteria and specifications referenced in the SON.

Part - II: Provide shallow anode CP system separately for wells 8 and 9. Possible required depth for the anode bed installation would be 5-50 ft. Trenching to install wires and connect the anode bed to the rectifier at 2-3 ft depth and 3-4 ft width. Trenching for cables would be on the gravel roads and within the fenced area around the wells shown on the map — digging must not exceed 4-5 ft deep or 3-4 ft wide.

The operational activities would be the same as the current CP system (currently disconnected).

Construction and site and site preparation requirements include:

• Drilling spots for bore holes 5-50 ft deep for installation of individual anode bed,

• 200-300 square foot area up to 5 ft deep. (possibly 100 ft long trenching on the gravel road area) for a single source anode bed installation

• Trenching 2-3 ft wide and 3-4 ft deep for wire connections to rectifier of each well is needed. (this trenching also can occur on the gravel road surfaces).

Laydown area could be provided on nearby hardened road surfaces.

f. Point of Contact:

Name: Susan Stewart Title: CIV / Air Quality Program Manager Organization: 9 CES/CEIE Email: susan.stewart.7@us.af.mil Phone Number: (530) 634-2844

2. Analysis: Total reasonably foreseeable net change in direct and indirect emissions associated with the action were estimated through ACAM on a calendar-year basis for the "worst-case" (highest annual emissions) and "steady state" (no net gain/loss in emission stabilized and the action is fully implemented) emissions. General Conformity under the Clean Air Act, Section 1.76 has been evaluated for the action described above according to the requirements of 40 CFR 93, Subpart B.

All emissions estimates were derived from various sources using the methods, algorithms, and emission factors from the most current Air Emissions Guide for Air Force Stationary Sources, Air Emissions Guide for Air Force Mobile Sources, and/or Air Emissions Guide for Air Force Transitory Sources. For greater details of this analysis, refer to the Detail ACAM Report.

applicable X not applicable

Conformity Analysis Summary:

Pollutant Action Emissions (ton/yr) GENERAL CONFORMITY

Threshold (ton/yr) Exceedance (Yes or No) Yuba City-Marysville, CA VOC 0.061 100 No NOx 0.485 100 No

CO 0.687

SOx 0.001 100 No

PM 10 0.115

PM 2.5 0.018 100 No Pb 0.000 NH3 0.001 100 No

NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

VOC 0.061

NOx 0.485

CO 0.687

SOx 0.001

PM 10 0.115

PM 2.5 0.018

Pb 0.000

NH3 0.001

2025 - (Steady State) Pollutant Action Emissions (ton/yr) GENERAL CONFORMITY

Threshold (ton/yr) Exceedance (Yes or No) Yuba City-Marysville, CA VOC 0.000 100 No NOx 0.000 100 No

CO 0.000

SOx 0.000 100 No

PM 10 0.000

PM 2.5 0.000 100 No Pb 0.000 NH3 0.000 100 No

NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

VOC 0.000

NOx 0.000

CO 0.000

SOx 0.000

PM 10 0.000

PM 2.5 0.000

Pb 0.000

NH3 0.000

The Criteria Pollutants (or their precursors) with a General Conformity threshold listed in the table above are pollutants within one or more designated nonattainment or maintenance area/s for the associated National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). These pollutants are driving this GCR Applicability Analysis. Pollutants exceeding the GCR thresholds must be further evaluated potentially through a GCR Determination.

The pollutants without a General Conformity threshold are pollutants only within areas designated attainment for the associated NAAQS. These pollutants have an insignificance indicator for VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM 10, PM 2.5, and NH3 of 250 ton/yr (Prevention of Significant Deterioration major source threshold) and 25 ton/yr for Pb (GCR de minimis value). Pollutants below their insignificance indicators are at rates so insignificant that they will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of one or more NAAQSs. These indicators do not define a significant impact;

however, they do provide a threshold to identify actions that are insignificant. Refer to the Level II, Air Quality Quantitative Assessment Insignificance Indicators for further details.

None of the annual net change in estimated emissions associated with this action are above the GCR threshold values established at 40 CFR 93.153 (b); therefore, the proposed Action has an insignificant impact on Air Quality and a General Conformity Determination is not applicable.

Susan Stewart, CIV / Air Quality Program Manager May 15 2024 Name, Title Date

Appendix V General Measures and Monitoring for

Proposed Projects

2018 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-244

2018 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-245

GENERAL MEASURES AND MONITORING FOR PROPOSED

PROJECTS

Beale AFB has developed general and species-specific avoidance and minimization measures designed to protect natural resources. General and activity-specific avoidance and minimization measures were designed to reduce effects and include measures such as identification of limited operating periods, pre-maintenance flagging of resources, and equipment restrictions. Most of these measures have been required or negotiated with the Service during previous Section 7 ESA consultations at Beale AFB.

Preconstruction Survey

MM-1. A Service-approved Biologist will conduct preconstruction surveys of all ground disturbance areas within sensitive habitats to determine if any federally-listed species may be present during the start of construction. These surveys will be conducted prior to the start of construction activities in and around any sensitive habitat. If any federally-listed species are found during the preconstruction surveys, the Service-approved Biologist will follow procedures outlined in Table 1 and Table 2. At least 15 business days prior to the onset of activities, Beale AFB will submit the name(s) and credentials of biologists who will conduct these preconstruction surveys if they have not previously received Service approval for similar surveys. A formal letter will be updated every time a Service-approved Biologist is added to the PBO list. No project activities will begin until proponents have received written approval from the Service that the biologist(s) is qualified to conduct the work through an updated Formal Letter from the Service of all Service-approved Biologists.

Monitoring

MM-2. A Natural Resources Monitor will monitor construction activities in or adjacent to sensitive habitats as required. The Natural Resources Monitor will ensure compliance with all applicable avoidance and minimization measures required to protect federally-listed species and their habitats.

MM-3. If federally-listed species are found that are likely to be affected by work activities, the Service-approved Biologist will have the authority to stop any aspect of the project that could result in take of a federally-listed species with the coordination from Beale AFB Contracting Office. If the Service-approved Biologist exercises this authority, she/he must coordinate this with the Beale Environmental Office to follow protocol laid out in this PBA.

Environmental Awareness Training

MM-4. A Service-approved Biologist will conduct environmental awareness training for all construction personnel working within and near sensitive habitat on Beale AFB. Training will be provided at the start of work and within 15 days of any new worker arrival. The program will consist of a briefing on environmental issues relative to the proposed project. The training program will include an overview of the legal status, biology distribution, habitat needs, and compliance requirements for each federally-listed species that may occur in the project area. The presentation will also include a discussion of the legal protection for endangered species under the ESA, including penalties for violations. A fact sheet conveying this information will be distributed to all personnel who enter the project site. Upon completion of the orientation, employees will sign a form stating that they attended the program and understand all avoidance and minimization measures. These forms will be maintained at Beale AFB and will be accessible to the appropriate resource agencies.

2018 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-246

Erosion Controls

MM-5. Wetlands/drainages/vernal pools, if present, will have erosion control measures (straw waddles, silt fencing) installed where hydrological continuity exists between the construction activities and the wetland or when work is within 25 feet of a wetland/drainage/vernal pool. A Service-approved Biologist or Natural Resources Monitor will determine whether erosion control measures should be utilized, weighing the potential for impacts to other species. Construction boundaries within the buffer will be designated with fencing or other suitable means to ensure no equipment and/or construction workers access protected wetland resources. These measures are in accordance with the current Beale AFB Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.

MM-6. All areas of upland ground disturbance or exposed soil will be reseeded with a native “weed free” seed mix approved by 9 CES/CEIE. Ground disturbance within vernal pools will require a restoration plan and two years of follow-up monitoring by a Service-approved Biologist. Note: direct impacts to wetlands require a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit issued by the USACE and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Pesticide and Herbicide Application

MM-7. Herbicide will only be administered by current Qualified Applicator Certificate holders (minimum qualification) from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. If the applicator will be using herbicides within jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S., the applicator needs to also have a current Aquatic Pesticide Applicator License. The Installation Pest Management Coordinator will receive qualifications from applicators within 30 days of contract award. These applicators must know and be able to recognize sensitive resources including listed wildlife plants, vernal pools and nesting birds. If not, they will receive Environmental Awareness Training (MM-4).

MM-8. The application of any pesticide, including herbicides will be conducted in accordance with approved Integrated Pest Management Plan, Invasive Plant Species Management Guidelines, and Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan.

MM-9. In areas with sensitive resources, use low-volume applications and reduce the amount of herbicide applied per acre. Spot applications rather than broadcast applications will be used when feasible to limit the effects of contamination of small mammals’ insect-based diets (Cal-IPC 2015b).

MM-10. Herbicides will not be sprayed in wetlands or waters of the US when water is present unless specifically targeting aquatic weeds and all permits and permissions are obtained. These permits include a NPDES Aquatic Pesticide Permit.

MM-12. When applying herbicides near wetlands in the dry season, herbicides can be applied up to the edge of the wetland. The wetland edge will be marked before application by a Service-approved Biologist. If application is required within a vernal pool, notification to the Service will be required.

MM-13. When applying herbicides near wetlands in the wet season (1 Nov to 1 May) or when the 2-week chance of rainfall is greater than 70%, herbicides may not be applied within the effective catchment or natural drainage area (as indicated by micro- and macro-topography) of a wetland where they may potentially run off into the wetland (Ripley et al. 2002, 2003).

MM-14. Herbicides will be applied under low wind conditions and within specified heat tolerances of volatile herbicides to protect nearby non-target vegetation.

MM-15. Herbicides will be applied according to the chemical manufacturer’s instructions on the label.

2018 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-247

All mixing of herbicides will be conducted at least 150 feet from water and often off Beale AFB.

MM-16. Herbicide applicators will prescribe and use only non-ionic surfactants near open water. These surfactants are readily biodegradable and low in aquatic toxicity.

MM-17. No herbicide will be applied within 100 feet of known Native American cultural sites without prior consultation with the Base NRM/CRM and local tribes.

Additional Measures

MM-18. Tools used to manage or control vegetation (such as chainsaws, hand clippers, and pruners, should be washed before being used on Beale AFB and before being moved from one location to another.

Earth-moving equipment brought onto Beale AFB should be washed before use and before being moved from one location to another (i.e. from one construction site to another). Water or compressed air will be used to remove any visible plant material, soil or compacted mud, gravel, sand, etc.

MM-19. Off-road travel outside of the demarcated construction boundaries will be prohibited.

MM-20. Prior to initiation of construction activities, sensitive areas, such as vernal pools, wetlands, riparian areas, and potential habitat for federally-listed species (i.e., VPFS/VPTS, VELB, WYBC or GGS), will be staked and flagged as exclusion zones where construction activities cannot take place.

Orange construction barrier fencing (or an appropriate alternative method) will designate exclusion zones where construction activities cannot occur. The flagging and fencing will be clearly marked as an environmentally sensitive area. The contractor will remove all fencing, stakes and flagging within 60 days of construction completion.

MM-21. Any worker that inadvertently kills or injures a federally-listed species, or finds one injured or trapped, will immediately report the incident to the on-site Biologist. The Biologist will inform the Beale Natural Resources Manager (NRM) immediately (9 CES/CEIE). The Beale NRM will verbally notify the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office within one day and will provide written notification of the incident within five days.

MM-22. Motor vehicles and equipment will only be fueled and serviced in designated service area. All fueling and maintenance of vehicles and other equipment will occur in a designated area with appropriate spill containment. Any newly established, project specific fueling and maintenance areas will be located at least 250 feet away from any wetland/drainage/creek habitat or water body. Prior to the onset of work, Beale AFB will ensure a plan, to allow a prompt and effective response to any accidental spills, is in place. All workers will be informed of the importance of preventing spills and of the appropriate measures to take should a spill occur.

MM-23. During construction activities, all trash that may attract animals will be properly contained, removed from the work site daily, and disposed of properly. Following construction, all refuse and construction debris will be removed from work areas. All garbage and project construction-related materials in construction areas will be removed immediately following project completion.

MM-24. Unless otherwise designated as part of a habitat restoration plan, all excess soil excavated during construction in the vicinity of vernal pools and other wetlands will be removed and disposed of outside the project area. Coordination with the Beale AFB Environmental Office and appropriate regulatory agencies is required prior to disposal of the excavated soil.

MM-25. The number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of the activity will be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal. Routes and boundaries will be

2018 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan A-248 clearly demarcated, and these areas will avoid wetlands/drainage areas whenever feasible.