Attachment_22_Sample_YDP_and_PS1_Water_Quality_Reports.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 140 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF YDP, IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- 140R3026R0012
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
This file is a sample water quality and operational data report for the Yuma Desalting Plant (YDP) for fiscal year 2026, documenting potable water and service water treatment performance metrics. The report contains detailed daily operational data for June 10, 2026, including three main treatment train sections: Pilot System 1 (PS1) Pretreatment, PS1 Reverse Osmosis (RO) systems, and potable/service water quality parameters. Key operational metrics tracked include turbidity (measured in NTU), pH levels, free and total chlorine residuals, conductivity, flow rates, and pressure differentials across cartridge filters and RO membrane stages. The document specifies water quality compliance standards, such as maintaining turbidity under 0.30 NTU for 95% of monthly readings, minimum free chlorine residuals of 0.2 mg/L, and pH ranges appropriate for each treatment stage.
The report also includes calendar year 2025 summary data showing cumulative water diversions, production volumes, and consumptive use tracked in acre-feet across multiple water source feeds including the Colorado River, WQIC well, and MODE (Main Outlet Drain Extension). Daily product discharge records indicate YDP produced approximately 247,116 cubic meters (approximately 200 acre-feet) of product water distributed through service water systems, potable water systems, and discharge to the Colorado River, with documented operational events including temporary flow interruptions for maintenance, equipment cleaning, and system outages. The facility tracks water conservation metrics, cooling tower operations, irrigation usage, and maintains detailed records of chemical dosing rates for sodium bicarbonate, ferric sulfate, lime slurry, and antiscalant (VITEC 5100) to optimize treatment efficiency and water quality compliance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PW
| Yuma Desalting Plant | ||||||||||||||
| FY 2026 | ||||||||||||||
| Potable Water and Service Water | ||||||||||||||
| Date: | 6/10/26 | |||||||||||||
| North UV Light | ||||||||||||||
| Manual Data | Instrument Data | UV Light Instrument | Sample Probe Selected (1 or 2) | |||||||||||
| Potable Water | Potable Water | Data | Dose | Flow | ||||||||||
| Time | Turbidity | pH | Chlorine | Time | Turbidity | pH | Chlorine | Time | mJ/cm2 | GPM | Time | Turbidity | pH | Chlorine |
| 0000 | 0.13 | 8.06 | 0.94 | 0000 | 0.02 | 8.06 | 0.91 | 0000 | 41.6 | 11.2 | 0000 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0300 | 0.11 | 8.07 | 0.96 | 0300 | 0.02 | 8.08 | 0.94 | 0300 | 42.2 | 13.1 | 0300 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0600 | 0.13 | 8.12 | 1.04 | 0600 | 0.02 | 8.10 | 1.01 | 0600 | 42.4 | 13.8 | 0600 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0900 | 0.10 | 8.07 | 0.84 | 0900 | 0.02 | 8.07 | 0.85 | 0900 | 41.6 | 16.8 | 0900 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1200 | 0.11 | 8.08 | 1.06 | 1200 | 0.02 | 8.04 | 1.02 | 1200 | 41.1 | 15.1 | 1200 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1500 | 0.09 | 7.97 | 0.98 | 1500 | 0.02 | 8.02 | 0.99 | 1500 | 40.7 | 15.4 | 1500 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1800 | 0.09 | 8.04 | 1.00 | 1800 | 0.02 | 8.02 | 1.00 | 1800 | 40.4 | 17.5 | 1800 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 2100 | 0.09 | 8.07 | 1.00 | 2100 | 0.02 | 8.04 | 0.98 | 2100 | 40.2 | 15.0 | 2100 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| PW | NTU | pH | Chlorine | PW | NTU | pH | Chlorine | UV | mJ/cm2 | GPM | GAC in Service (S or N) | ||
| average | 0.11 | 8.06 | 0.98 | average | 0.02 | 8.05 | 0.96 | average | 41.3 | 14.7 | South 21:00 | Influent pH | Secured |
| Effluent pH | Secured | ||||||||||||
| *Minumum manual free chlorine residual for the previous 24 hour period | North 21:00 | Influent pH | 9.41 | ||||||||||
| mg/L | 0.84 | Effluent pH | 7.21 |
| * Record time and turbidity value for any readings exceeding 1 NTU | ||||||||||||||
| Service Water Influent | * Turbidity values must reamin under .30 NTUs for 95% of the monthly readings | |||||||||||||
| Manual | Instr. | * Record time and chlorine residual for any readings less than .2 mg/L | ||||||||||||
| Data | Data | |||||||||||||
| Time | pH | pH | Turbidity | Free Chlorine | Cartridge Filter Differential Pressure | |||||||||
| 0000 | 9.28 | 9.04 | Time | NTU | Time | mg/L | Time | North Bank | South Bank | |||||
| 0300 | 9.26 | 8.94 | 0000 | Secured | #1 kPa | 8.9 | #3 kPa | |||||||
| 0600 | 9.51 | 9.24 | 0000 | Secured | #2 kPa | 1.8 | #4 kPa | |||||||
| 0900 | 9.41 | 9.32 | 1200 | Secured | #1 kPa | 11.2 | #3 kPa | |||||||
| 1200 | 9.59 | 9.35 | 1200 | Secured | #2 kPa | 2.5 | #4 kPa | |||||||
| 1500 | 9.30 | 9.11 | ||||||||||||
| 1800 | 9.28 | 9.20 | ||||||||||||
| 2100 | 9.36 | 9.18 | Sodium Bicarbonate | Service Water | Potable Water | |||||||||
| Drawdown | Ortho Polyphosphate Drawdown | TI-2906 Drawdown | ||||||||||||
| SW | pH | pH | 0000 | 100 | mL/min | S.G. | 0000 | 200 | mL/hr | 0000 | Secured | mL/hr | ||
| average | 9.37 | 9.17 | 1200 | 100 | mL/min | 1.040 | 1200 | 200 | mL/hr | 1200 | Secured | mL/hr |
Comments: 18:00 found PW pH & CL2 #2 probes selected
PS 1
| Yuma Desalting Plant | ||||||
| FY 2026 | ||||||
| Pilot System 1 Pretreatment | ||||||
| Date: | 6/10/26 | |||||
| 2400 - 0600 | 0600 - 1800 | 1800 - 2400 | ||||
| Operator | Mendoza | Herrera | Weber | |||
| Actual Time | 3:15 | 10:00 | 18:30 | |||
| MODE 1 | manual | pH | 7.89 | |||
| Intake Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 3783 | 3612 | 3702 | |
| Intake Turbidity | manual | NTU | 5.8 | 6.7 | 11.0 | |
| Chlorine Dosage Rate | manual | lbs/day | 35 | 40 | 40 | |
| 1 Ton Scale Reading | manual | kg | 140 | |||
| Intake Temperature | Instrument | OC | 27.8 | 27.6 | 28.5 | |
| Intake Free Chlorine | manual | mg/L | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Intake Total Chlorine | manual | mg/L | 5.9 | 5.6 | 5.3 | |
| SCR Influent Flow | UCOS | L/s | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
| SCR Influent Flow Totalizer | From Flow Meter | m3 | 3809022 | |||
| SCR Mixer Speed | UCOS | % | 56 | 56 | 56 | |
| SCR Rake Speed | UCOS | % | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| SCR Rake Torque | UCOS | N m | 29 | 60 | 99 | |
| SCR RZ pH | manual | pH | 10.10 | 10.02 | 10.15 | |
| SCR RZ pH | Instrument | pH | 10.07 | 9.90 | 10.10 | |
| SCR Effluent pH | manual | pH | 10.11 | 10.07 | 10.15 | |
| SCR Effluent pH | Instrument | pH | 10.14 | 9.96 | 10.07 | |
| SCR Eff Turbidity | manual | NTU | 4.86 | 14.40 | 16.50 | |
| SCR Eff Turbidity | Instrument | NTU | 64.80 | 19.45 | 28.05 | |
| Sludge Level | manual | inches | 8 | 10 | 6 | |
| Blowdown Solids | manual | % | 16.1 | 19.9 | 24.7 | |
| Blowdown Interval | UCOS | minutes | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| SCR RZ V/V's | manual | % / % | 5/6 | 8/10 | 7/10 | |
| Ferric Sulfate Drawdown | manual | mL/minute | 89 | 89 | 89 | |
| Ferric Sulfate specific gravity | manual | S.G. | 1.244 | 1.244 | 1.244 | |
| Lime slurry specific gravity | manual | S.G. | 1.060 | 1.060 | 1.060 | |
| Lime slurry pump speed | manual | % | 23.00 | 25.00 | 23.50 | |
| DMGF Influent pH | manual | pH | 7.78 | 7.90 | 7.90 | |
| Clearwell Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 3387 | 3535 | 3448 | |
| Clearwell Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.11 | |
| Clearwell Turbidity | UCOS | NTU | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |
| Clearwell pH | manual | pH | 3.86 | 4.09 | 4.03 | |
| Clearwell pH | Instrument | pH | 4.15 | 4.00 | 4.14 | |
| Clearwell Free Chlorine | manual | mg/L | 0.89 | 1.19 | 0.81 | |
| Clearwell Free Chlorine | Instrument | mg/L | 0.81 | 1.24 | 0.86 | |
| Clearwell Total Chlorine | manual | mg/L | 1.32 | 1.55 | 1.38 | |
| Clearwell Plugging Factor | Instrument | % | 14 | 14 | 12 | |
| Filter Cell 1 Plugging Factor | Instrument | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Filter Cell 2 Plugging Factor | Instrument | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Filter Cell 3 Plugging Factor | Instrument | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Filter Cell 4 Plugging Factor | Instrument | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Filter Cell 1 Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.28 | |
| Filter Cell 2 Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.28 | |
| Filter Cell 3 Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.12 | |
| Filter Cell 4 Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.12 | |
| Filter Cell 1 pH | manual | pH | 7.79 | 8.50 | 8.62 | |
| Filter Cell 2 pH | manual | pH | 8.56 | 8.39 | 8.35 | |
| Filter Cell 3 pH | manual | pH | 8.46 | 8.49 | 8.68 | |
| Filter Cell 4 pH | manual | pH | 8.18 | 8.47 | 8.61 |
| Yuma Desalting Plant | |||||||||||
| FY 2026 | |||||||||||
| Pilot System 1 RO | |||||||||||
| Date: | 6/10/26 | North Bank | South Bank | North Bank | South Bank | South Bank | South Bank | ||||
| 0001 - 0600 | 0600 - 1800 | 0600 - 1800 | 1800 - 2400 | ||||||||
| Operator | Mendoza | Herrera | Weber | ||||||||
| Actual Time | 3:30 | 10:30 | 19:00 | ||||||||
| RO #1 Feed pH | manual | pH | 5.26 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 5.72 | |||||
| RO #1 Feed Temperature | instrument | oC | 27.1 | 0.0 | 26.0 | 28.0 | |||||
| RO #1 Feed Chlorine | manual | mg/L | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.18 | |||||
| RO #1 Feed Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.11 | |||||
| RO #1 Ammonia Feed Rate | rotometer | kg/hr | 0.11 | 0 | 0.11 | 0.11 | |||||
| RO #1 Feed Pressure | instrument | mpa | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 1.52 | |||||
| RO #1 Feed Plugging Factor | manual (Chemetek) | % | 14 | 0 | 13 | 11 | |||||
| RO #1 Feed Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 3342 | 0 | 3485 | 3401 | |||||
| RO #1 Product Flow | instrument | L/s | 8.2 | 0.0 | 8.2 | 8.3 | |||||
| RO #1 Product Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 672 | 0 | 686 | 683 | |||||
| RO #1 VITEC 5100 Drawdown | manual | mL/hour | 74.4 | 0 | 74.4 | 74.4 | |||||
| RO #1 Reject Flow | instrument | L/s | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | |||
| RO #1 Reject Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 9150 | 9288 | 9393 | 9466 | 9397 | 9472 | |||
| RO #1 1ST Stage Differential | UCOS | kPa | 241 | 249 | 238 | 248 | 244 | 255 | |||
| RO #1 2nd Stage Differential | UCOS | kPa | 139 | 109 | 130 | 109 | 130 | 111 | |||
| RO #1 Intersatge Conductivity | Manual | uS/cm | 5433 | 5459 | 5669 | 5676 | 5567 | 5562 | |||
| RO #1 Intestage Temperature | Manual | oC | 28 | 28 | 26.3 | 26.3 | 28.3 | 28.1 | |||
| RO #1 Reject Free Chlorine | Manual | mg/L | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |||
| RO #1 Interstage Free Chlorine | Manual | mg/L | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| RO #2 Feed pH | manual | pH | 5.83 | 6.02 | 6.15 |
| RO #2 Feed Temperature | instrument | oC | 26.4 | 25.9 | 27.9 |
| RO #2 Feed Chlorine | manual | mg/L | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| RO #2 Feed Turbidity | manual | NTU | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| RO #2 Ammonia Feed Rate | rotometer | kg/hr | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| RO #2 Feed Pressure | instrument | mpa | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.23 |
| RO #2 Feed Plugging Factor | manual (Chemetek) | % | 13 | 12 | 10 |
| RO #2 Feed Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 3373 | 3490 | 3412 |
| RO #2 Product Flow | instrument | L/s | 12.9 | 12.9 | 12.9 |
| RO #2 Product Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 663 | 654 | 668 |
| RO #2 Reject Flow | instrument | L/s | 4.29 | 4.29 | 4.29 |
| RO #2 Reject Conductivity | manual | uS/cm | 8979 | 9342 | 9135 |
| RO #2 VITEC 5100 Drawdown | manual | mL/hour | 114 | 114 | 114 |
| RO #2 1ST Stage Differential North | instrument | kPa | 99.0 | 98.0 | 103.0 |
| RO #2 1ST Stage Conductivity North | manual | uS/cm | 5760 | 5839 | 5735 |
| RO #2 2nd Stage Differential North | instrument | kPa | 96.0 | 101.0 | 102.0 |
| RO #2 1ST Stage Differential South | instrument | kPa | 145.0 | 148.0 | 145.0 |
| RO #2 1ST Stage Conductivity South | manual | uS/cm | 6009 | 6134 | 5984 |
| RO #2 2nd Stage Differential South | instrument | kPa | 58.0 | 56.0 | 62.0 |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 1 | instrument | kPa | 140 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 2 | instrument | kPa | 160 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 3 | instrument | kPa | 150 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 4 | instrument | kPa | 140 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 5 | instrument | kPa | 40 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 6 | instrument | kPa | 50 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 7 | instrument | kPa | 160 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 8 | instrument | kPa | 140 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 9 | instrument | kPa | 120 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 10 | instrument | kPa | 60 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 11 | instrument | kPa | 60 | |
| RO #2 Product Pressure Vessel 12 | instrument | kPa | 50 | |
| Product Airbreak | manual | pH | 5.31 | |
| Product Airbreak | manual | oC | 26.4 | |
| MODE 2 Influent | manual | pH | 4.37 | |
| MODE 2 Influent | manual | oC | 27.2 | |
| MODE 2 Discharge to River | manual | pH | 6.39 | |
| MODE 2 Discharge to River | manual | oC | 28.9 |
Data
| Yuma Desalting Plant | |||||||
| FY 2026 | |||||||
| Date: | 06/10/26 | Name: | Mendoza | Time: 0500 | |||
| PS1 Daily Data | |||||||
| PS 1 Pretreatment | PS 1 Dual Media Gravity Filters | ||||||
| Intake Turbidity | NTU | 5.79 | DMGF Influent pH | pH | 7.78 | ||
| Intake Conductivity | uS/cm | 3783 | Cell 1 & 3 Plugging Factors | % | N/A | N/A | |
| Chlorine Dosage Rate | lbs/day | 35.0 | Cell 2 & 4 Plugging Factors | % | N/A | N/A | |
| Intake Temperature | OC | 27.8 | Clearwell Turbidity | NTU | 0.14 | ||
| Intake Free Chlorine | mg/L | 4.7 | Clearwell Free Chlorine | mg/L | 0.89 | ||
| SCR Influent Flow | L/s | 37 | Clearwell Plugging Factor | % | 14.0 | ||
| SCR pH setpoint | pH | Manual | Clearwell pH | pH | 3.86 | ||
| SCR Reaction Zone pH | pH | 10.10 | Clearwell Conductivity | uS/cm | 3387 | ||
| SCR Effluent pH | pH | 10.11 | Cell Backwashed (previous day) | 1 | |||
| SCR Effluent Chlorine | mg/L | 2.50 | Sewage Treatment Facility | ||||
| SCR Mixer Speed | % | 56 | Blower In Service | 1 | |||
| SCR Rake Speed | % | 20 | Lift Station Vault Inspection | ||||
| SCR Effluent Turbidity | NTU | 4.9 | Lift Station 1 | Dry | |||
| SCR Blowdown Solids | % | 16.1 | Lift Station 2 | Dry | |||
| SCR V/V Solids | % | 5/6 | Lift Station 3 | Dry | |||
| SCR Blowdown Interval | minutes | 20 | Lift Station 4 | Dry | |||
| SCR Sludge Level | inches | 8 | PS1 Air Break ORP (manual mV) | 258 | |||
| Ferric Sulfate Drawdown | mL/min | 89 | Sodium Bisulfite Drawdown (mL/min) | 10 | |||
| Ferric Sulfate Specific Gravity | s.g. | 1.244 | Cold Storage Facility | East | West | ||
| Lime Slurry Specific Gravity | s.g. | 1.060 | Maximum Temperature | OC | 9 | 9 | |
| Lime Slurry Pump Speed | % | 23 | Minimum Temperature | OC | 6 | 6 | |
| RO #1 Unit | RO #2 Unit | ||||||
| Feed Conductivity (bench) | uS/cm | 3342 | Feed Conductivity (bench) | uS/cm | 3373 | ||
| Feed Free Chlorine (bench) | mg/L | 0.10 | Feed Free Chlorine (bench) | mg/L | 0.11 | ||
| Feed pH (bench) | pH | 5.26 | Feed pH (bench) | pH | 5.83 | ||
| Feed Temperature | OC | 27.1 | Feed Temperature | OC | 26.4 | ||
| Feed Turbidity (bench) | NTU | 0.18 | Feed Turbidity (bench) | NTU | 0.15 | ||
| Ammonia Feed Rate | kg/hr | 0.11 | Ammonia Feed Rate | kg/hr | 0.17 | ||
| Feed Pressure | mPa | 1.43 | Feed Pressure | mPa | 1.21 | ||
| Feed Plugging Factor | % | 14.0 | Feed Plugging Factor | % | 13.0 | ||
| Total Product Flow | L/s | 8.22 | Product Flow | L/s | 12.88 | ||
| Product Conductivity (bench) | uS/cm | 672 | Product Conductivity (bench) | uS/cm | 663 | ||
| Total Reject Flow | L/s | 3.00 | Reject Flow | L/s | 4.29 | ||
| Reject Conductivity NB (bench) | uS/cm | 9150 | Reject Conductivity (bench) | uS/cm | 8979 | ||
| Reject Conductivity SB (bench) | uS/cm | 9288 | 1ST Stage Differential North | kPa | 99.0 | ||
| Reject Free Chlorine SB | mg/L | 0.10 | 1ST Stage Differential South | kPa | 145.0 | ||
| Interstage Free Chlorine SB | mg/L | 0.09 | VITEC 5100 Drawdown Rate | mL/hour | 114.0 | ||
| 1ST Stage Differential North | kPa | 241.0 | Cartridge Filter Pressure | Inlet / PSI | 30 | ||
| 1ST Stage Differential South | kPa | 249.0 | Outlet / PSI | 24 | |||
| VITEC 5100 Drawdown Rate | mL/hour | 74.4 | Comments: | ||||
| Cartridge Filter Pressure | Inlet / PSI | 32 | |||||
| Outlet / PSI | 24 |
Calcs
| RO Calculations | ||
| HWS | ||
| Result | ||
| Calculation | Method | (%) |
| Recovery | Flow | 73.2620320856 |
| Recovery | TDS | 70.8965458521 |
| Salt Passage | TDS | 9.8057398282 |
| Salt Rejection | TDS | 90.1942601718 |
| FS | ||
| Recovery | Flow | 75.0145602796 |
| Recovery | TDS | 69.8244428922 |
| Salt Passage | TDS | 9.7016238317 |
| Salt Rejection | TDS | 90.2983761683 |
TDS
| TDS Calculations | |||
| MODE | |||
| Stream | ac | bc | bp |
| 0.5175 | 0.00351 | 0.503 | |
| HWS | |||
| Cond. | TDS | ||
| (μS/cm) | (mg/l) | ||
| Feed | 3342 | 2080.4203675184 | |
| Reject | 9150 | 6324.9492301967 | |
| Product | 672 | 338.016 | |
| Concentrate (TDS) | 3447.1238878653 | ||
| FS | |||
| Feed | 3373 | 2101.3570262255 | |
| Reject | 8979 | 6192.0984033419 | |
| Product | 663 | 333.489 | |
| Concentrate (TDS) | 3437.4554794815 |
Summary Yuma Desalting Plant
| Calendar Year 2025 - In Acre Feet | ||||||
| DIVERSIONS | ||||||
| MODE | DW8 | WQIC Well | Colorado River | Cooper Lateral | Yuma Mesa Conduit |
| Month | From | Total | Discharge | Septic | From | Discharge | Septic | Consumptive Use | From | Discharge | Septic | Consumptive Use | From | Discharge | Septic | Consumptive Use | From | Discharge | Septic | Consumptive Use | From | Discharge | Septic | Consumptive Use |
| Reject | to River | Discharge | to River | Discharge | to River | Discharge | to River | Discharge | to River | Discharge | to River | Discharge | ||||||||||||
| (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | (acre-feet) | |
| January | 58.0 | 14.7 | 13.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16.1 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 12.4 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| February | 24.9 | 8.9 | 6.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35.0 | 8.7 | 0.2 | 26.1 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| March | 80.3 | 15.9 | 22.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| April | 77.7 | 15.4 | 21.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| May | 79.5 | 15.6 | 21.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| June | 77.7 | 15.4 | 21.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| July | 75.7 | 13.7 | 18.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| August | 80.0 | 15.7 | 22.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| September | 67.7 | 14.4 | 18.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.1 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| October | 80.3 | 15.9 | 23.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| November | 77.1 | 15.1 | 21.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| December | 38.6 | 11.9 | 9.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41.8 | 10.4 | 0.2 | 31.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| PS 1 Total | 817.5 | 172.5 | 220.7 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 106.9 | 26.4 | 0.5 | 80.0 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Returned to MODE via Service Water Overflow | 151.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Returned from Potable Water Sampling System | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Returned via WQIC Drains | 0.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Returned to MODE via PS 1 Clearwell Overflow | 253.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Returned to MODE via Cooling Tower Blowdown | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total to MODE - Measured | 586.3 | AF |
| Used by cooling tower | 3.0 | Evaporation | |
| Used by irrigation | 0.5 | Consumption | |
| On-Site Usage | 3.6 | AF |
Water Conserved 225.4 AF MODE water (non-Colorado River water) discharged to River/River aquifer. This goes into USBR Conservation Table.
Unaccounted for (air compressors, etc.) 104.4 AF Plant Drain to MODE
Total Returned to MODE 690.7 AF
Consumptive Use 102.2 AF Offset for water returned to River
Flows
| Pilot System 1 - cubic meters/acre feet | CY 2025 | ||||||||
| WQIC Feed (total) | Return To MODE | Discharge To Colorado River | Total Product Produced | ||||||
| Reject | Product | Product | |||||||
| Jan | 91414 | 74.1 |
Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
16.1 ac.ft. of the 74.1
| ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well | Jan | 18097 | 14.7 | Jan | 20638 | 16.731 | Jan | 52122 | 42.3 |
| Feb | 73843 | 59.9 |
Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
1,135.9 ac.ft. of the 59.9
| ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well | Feb | 10970 | 8.9 | Feb | 18369 | 14.892 | Feb | 32154 | 26.1 | ||||||
| Mar | 99049 | 80.3 | Mar | 19607 | 15.9 | Mar | 27480 | 22.278 | Mar | 56468 | 45.8 | ||||
| Apr | 95854 | 77.7 | Apr | 18974 | 15.4 | Apr | 26373 | 21.381 | Apr | 54646 | 44.3 | Delivered to Service Water System | 251.1 | ||
| May | 98073 | 79.5 | May | 19243 | 15.6 | May | 26987 | 21.879 | May | 55420 | 44.9 | Delivered from Service Water System | 100.1 | ||
| Jun | 95854 | 77.7 | Jun | 18974 | 15.4 | Jun | 26952 | 21.850 | Jun | 54646 | 44.3 | Returned to MODE via Service Water Overflow | 151.0 | ||
| Jul | 98224 | 79.6 |
Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
3.9 ac.ft. of the 79.6
| ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well | Jul | 16841 | 13.7 | Jul | 24208 | 19.626 | Jul | 48666 | 39.5 | Returned to MODE via PS 1 Clearwell Overflow | 253.7 | |||||
| Aug | 98680 | 80.0 | Aug | 19407 | 15.7 | Aug | 27764 | 22.509 | Aug | 55892 | 45.3 | Returned from Potable Water Sampling System | 6.0 | |||
| Sep | 95911 | 77.8 |
Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
10.1 ac.ft. of the 77.8
| ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well | Sep | 17743 | 14.4 | Sep | 26192 | 21.234 | Sep | 51312 | 41.6 | Returned via WQIC Drains | 0.43 | |||||
| Oct | 99108 | 80.3 | Oct | 19607 | 15.9 | Oct | 28331 | 22.969 | Oct | 56468 | 45.8 | Used for potable water | 5.2 | |||
| Nov | 95113 | 77.1 | Nov | 18646 | 15.1 | Nov | 26941 | 21.842 | Nov | 53701 | 43.5 | Used by cooling tower | 3.0 | |||
| Dec | 99108 | 80.3 |
Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
41.8 ac.ft. of the 80.3 ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
16.1 ac.ft. of the 74.1 ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
1,135.9 ac.ft. of the 59.9 ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
3.9 ac.ft. of the 79.6 ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well Olaiz, Antonio M: Olaiz, Antonio M:
10.1 ac.ft. of the 77.8
| ac.ft. that was reported came from WQIC well | Dec | 14648 | 11.9 | Dec | 24578 | 19.926 | Dec | 43031 | 34.9 | Used by irrigation | 0.5 | |
| 924.4 | 172.5 | 247.116 | 498.2 |
| PS 1 Clearwell Overflow | ||
| Feedwater | ||
| Jan | 21195 | 17.2 |
| Feb | 30719 | 24.9 |
| Mar | 22974 | 18.6 |
| Apr | 22233 | 18.0 |
| May | 23410 | 19.0 |
| Jun | 22233 | 18.0 |
| Jul | 32717 | 26.5 |
| Aug | 23381 | 19.0 |
| Sep | 26856 | 21.8 |
| Oct | 23033 | 18.7 |
| Nov | 22766 | 18.5 |
| Dec | 41429 | 33.6 |
| 253.7 |
Product to River
| avg flow | |||||
| date | hrs | from PI | cubic meters | total cubic meters | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.515 | 908 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.497 | 907 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.502 | 907 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.507 | 908 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.494 | 907 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.491 | 906 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.503 | 907 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.506 | 908 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.491 | 906 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.493 | 907 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.497 | 907 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.495 | 907 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.495 | 907 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.499 | 907 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.247 | 885 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.110 | 873 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.001 | 864 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 9.987 | 863 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.050 | 868 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.071 | 870 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.491 | 906 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 8.877 | 767 | ||
| 24 | 12.33 | 3.010 | 134 | Product to the river was secured at 1140 due to scheduled MODE outage to repair concrete upstream. | |
| 25 | 0 | 0.189 | 0 | Product to the river remained secured due to schedule MODE outage to repair concrete upstream. | |
| 26 | 0 | 0.183 | 0 | ||
| 27 | 0 | 0.191 | 0 | ||
| 28 | 0 | 0.187 | 0 | ||
| 29 | 0 | 0.187 | 0 | ||
| 30 | 0 | 0.194 | 0 | January | |
| 31 | 0 | 0.181 | 0 | 20638 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0.188 | 0 | Product to the river remained secured due to scheduled MODE outage to repair concrete upstream in canal. | |
| 2 | 0 | 0.179 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0.178 | 0 | ||
| 4 | 0 | 0.178 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 0 | 0.177 | 0 | ||
| 6 | 0 | 0.180 | 0 | ||
| 7 | 11 | 4.616 | 183 | Product to the river was resumed on 2/7/25 at 13:00. | |
| 8 | 24 | 10.180 | 880 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.195 | 881 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 9.841 | 850 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 9.550 | 825 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 9.150 | 791 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 9.176 | 793 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 9.379 | 810 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 9.597 | 829 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 9.780 | 845 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 9.851 | 851 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 9.793 | 846 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.380 | 897 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.381 | 897 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.384 | 897 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.368 | 896 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.383 | 897 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.411 | 900 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.438 | 902 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.470 | 905 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.418 | 900 | February | |
| 28 | 24 | 10.366 | 896 | 18369 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.373 | 896 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.372 | 896 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.358 | 895 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.354 | 895 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.387 | 897 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.370 | 896 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.345 | 894 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.354 | 895 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.348 | 894 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.370 | 896 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.369 | 896 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.383 | 897 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.325 | 892 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.288 | 889 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.307 | 891 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.332 | 893 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.330 | 893 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.279 | 888 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.092 | 872 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.031 | 867 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.062 | 869 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.086 | 871 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.103 | 873 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.218 | 883 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.213 | 882 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.216 | 883 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.207 | 882 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.159 | 878 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.120 | 874 | ||
| 30 | 24 | 10.140 | 876 | March | |
| 31 | 24 | 10.162 | 878 | 27480 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.098 | 872 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 8.687 | 751 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.085 | 871 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.142 | 876 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.138 | 876 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.163 | 878 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.215 | 883 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.217 | 883 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.263 | 887 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.273 | 888 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.295 | 889 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.271 | 887 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.250 | 886 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.235 | 884 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.228 | 884 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.242 | 885 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.189 | 880 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.168 | 878 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.197 | 881 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.191 | 880 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.249 | 886 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.281 | 888 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.284 | 889 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.251 | 886 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.240 | 885 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.185 | 880 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.175 | 879 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.304 | 890 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.365 | 896 | April | |
| 30 | 24 | 10.364 | 895 | 26373 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.399 | 899 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.375 | 896 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.376 | 897 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.358 | 895 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 9.839 | 850 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.266 | 887 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.336 | 893 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.373 | 896 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.440 | 902 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.499 | 907 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.464 | 904 | ||
| 12 | 22.75 | 9.895 | 810 | Product to the river flow was temporary secured at 0840 to clean algae in product air break. Product to the river flow was resumed at 0955. | |
| 13 | 24 | 9.915 | 857 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.157 | 878 | ||
| 15 | 22.167 | 9.580 | 764 | Product to the river flow was temporary secured at 1630 due to RO 1 & 2 down. Product to the river flow was resumed at 18:20. | |
| 16 | 24 | 10.507 | 908 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.505 | 908 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.465 | 904 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.311 | 891 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.196 | 881 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.240 | 885 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.346 | 894 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.323 | 892 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.275 | 888 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.246 | 885 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.285 | 889 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.319 | 892 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.318 | 892 | ||
| 29 | 17.38 | 7.479 | 468 | Product to the river flow was temporary secured at 0538 to clean PS 1 intake basin. Product to the river flow was resumed at 1215. | |
| 30 | 24 | 10.282 | 888 | May | |
| 31 | 24 | 10.289 | 889 | 26987 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.200 | 881 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.271 | 887 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.327 | 892 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.363 | 895 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.367 | 896 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.366 | 896 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.345 | 894 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.355 | 895 | ||
| 9 | 22.667 | 9.856 | 804 | Product to the river flow was temporary secured at 0750 to clean algae in product air break. Product to the river flow was resumed at 0910. | |
| 10 | 24 | 10.360 | 895 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.180 | 880 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.502 | 907 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.477 | 905 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.494 | 907 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.512 | 908 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.511 | 908 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.499 | 907 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.496 | 907 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.507 | 908 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.539 | 911 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.494 | 907 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.488 | 906 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.500 | 907 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.503 | 907 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.499 | 907 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.495 | 907 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.488 | 906 | June | |
| 30 | 24 | 10.500 | 907 | 26952 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.491 | 906 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.513 | 908 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.501 | 907 | ||
| 5 | 22.33 | 9.263 | 745 | Product flow to the river was temporarily secured at 15:20 due to PS 1 intake influent line plugged. Flow was resumed at 17:00 | |
| 6 | 24 | 5.497 | 475 | Product flow to the river was decreased to fill service water tank. | |
| 7 | 24 | 5.489 | 474 | Product flow to the river was decreased to fill service water tank. | |
| 8 | 0.60 | 0.258 | 1 | Product flow to the river was secured at 00:36 due to the installation of PS 1 RO 2 cartridge filter housings. | |
| 9 | 0 | 0.131 | 0 | Product flow to the river remained secured. | |
| 10 | 4.50 | 2.085 | 34 | Product flow to the river was resumed at 19:30 | |
| 11 | 24 | 10.495 | 907 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.496 | 907 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.454 | 903 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.510 | 908 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.463 | 904 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.506 | 908 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.502 | 907 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.508 | 908 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.499 | 907 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.505 | 908 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.147 | 877 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.059 | 869 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.495 | 907 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.502 | 907 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.497 | 907 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.500 | 907 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.468 | 904 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 29 | 22.33 | 9.753 | 784 | Product flow to the river was temporarily secured at 07:30 to clean algae in product break piping. Flow was resumed at 09:10 | |
| 30 | 24 | 10.509 | 908 | July | |
| 31 | 24 | 10.4916322958 | 906 | 24208 | |
| 1 | 20 | 8.773 | 632 | Product flow to the river was temporarily secured at 11:15 due to PS 1 intake pumps tripped due to power control board failure. Flow was resumed at 15:15. | |
| 2 | 24 | 10.492 | 907 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.506 | 908 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.501 | 907 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.657 | 921 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.333 | 893 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.251 | 886 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.333 | 893 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.473 | 905 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.475 | 905 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.464 | 904 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.475 | 905 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.411 | 899 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.500 | 907 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.493 | 907 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.501 | 907 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.504 | 908 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.479 | 905 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.477 | 905 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.505 | 908 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.491 | 906 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.516 | 909 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.486 | 906 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.502 | 907 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.491 | 906 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.498 | 907 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.506 | 908 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.501 | 907 | ||
| 30 | 24 | 10.404 | 899 | August | |
| 31 | 24 | 10.310 | 891 | 27764 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.107 | 873 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.120 | 874 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 9.900 | 855 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.474 | 905 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 9.666 | 835 | Product flow to the river was decreased to 8.5 l/s due to RO 1 secured. | |
| 6 | 24 | 8.511 | 735 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 8.481 | 733 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 8.503 | 735 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 8.619 | 745 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.474 | 905 | Product flow to the river was increased to 10.5 l/s. | |
| 11 | 22.83 | 10.130 | 833 | Product flow to the river was temporary secured at 07:20 to clean product air break pipe. Product to the river flow was resumed at 08:30. | |
| 12 | 24 | 10.789 | 932 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.532 | 910 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.339 | 893 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.364 | 895 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.420 | 900 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.465 | 904 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.466 | 904 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.517 | 909 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.582 | 914 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.564 | 913 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.520 | 909 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.469 | 905 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.332 | 893 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.423 | 901 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.351 | 894 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.351 | 894 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.338 | 893 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.410 | 899 | September | |
| 30 | 24 | 10.431 | 901 | 26192 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.410 | 899 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.461 | 904 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.468 | 904 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.381 | 897 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.342 | 894 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.362 | 895 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.343 | 894 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.341 | 893 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.416 | 900 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.617 | 917 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.619 | 917 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.692 | 924 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.689 | 924 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.555 | 912 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.610 | 917 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 10.631 | 919 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 10.632 | 919 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.664 | 921 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 10.678 | 923 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 10.702 | 925 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.689 | 924 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.678 | 923 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.674 | 922 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.673 | 922 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.710 | 925 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.759 | 930 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.765 | 930 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.643 | 920 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.609 | 917 | ||
| 30 | 24 | 10.552 | 912 | October | |
| 31 | 24 | 10.542 | 911 | 28331 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.597 | 916 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.747 | 929 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.676 | 922 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 10.390 | 898 | ||
| 5 | 24 | 10.647 | 920 | ||
| 6 | 24 | 10.723 | 926 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 10.712 | 926 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 10.741 | 928 | ||
| 9 | 24 | 10.764 | 930 | ||
| 10 | 24 | 10.757 | 929 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 10.787 | 932 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 10.728 | 927 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 10.729 | 927 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 10.793 | 933 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 10.807 | 934 | ||
| 16 | 18 | 5.950 | 386 | Product water flow to the river with sodium bisulfite injection was secured from 09:40 to 15:40 due to unscheduled power outage. | |
| 17 | 24 | 9.912 | 856 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 10.512 | 908 | ||
| 19 | 22.83 | 10.111 | 831 | Product water flow to the river with sodium bisulfite injection was secured from 08:50 to 10:00 due to unscheduled power outage. | |
| 20 | 24 | 10.623 | 918 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 10.651 | 920 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 10.672 | 922 | ||
| 23 | 24 | 10.695 | 924 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 10.592 | 915 | ||
| 25 | 22.50 | 10.123 | 820 | Product water flow to the river was temporary secured at 08:00 to clean algae build up in the product air break. Product water flow to the river was resumed at 09:30. | |
| 26 | 24 | 10.797 | 933 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 10.801 | 933 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 10.795 | 933 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 10.790 | 932 | November | |
| 30 | 24 | 10.812 | 934 | 26941 | |
| 1 | 24 | 10.846 | 937 | ||
| 2 | 24 | 10.829 | 936 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 10.828 | 936 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 9.625 | 832 | Product water flow was decreased to 8.5 L/s due to only one RO online. | |
| 5 | 22.42 | 7.803 | 630 | Product water flow was temporarily secured at 06:55 due to scheduled outage of RO's to perform PM. Flow was resumed at 08:30. | |
| 6 | 24 | 8.276 | 715 | ||
| 7 | 24 | 8.402 | 726 | ||
| 8 | 24 | 8.624 | 745 | ||
| 9 | 23.22 | 8.457 | 707 | Product water flow was temporarily secured at 08:30 due to FCU update. Flow was resumed at 09:17. | |
| 10 | 24 | 8.542 | 738 | ||
| 11 | 24 | 8.578 | 741 | ||
| 12 | 24 | 8.584 | 742 | ||
| 13 | 24 | 8.691 | 751 | ||
| 14 | 24 | 8.744 | 755 | ||
| 15 | 24 | 8.716 | 753 | ||
| 16 | 24 | 8.659 | 748 | ||
| 17 | 24 | 8.682 | 750 | ||
| 18 | 24 | 8.709 | 752 | ||
| 19 | 24 | 8.733 | 755 | ||
| 20 | 24 | 8.736 | 755 | ||
| 21 | 24 | 8.578 | 741 | ||
| 22 | 24 | 8.622 | 745 | Product water flow was increased to 10.5 L/s, both RO's are online. | |
| 23 | 24 | 9.710 | 839 | ||
| 24 | 24 | 9.705 | 838 | ||
| 25 | 24 | 10.033 | 867 | ||
| 26 | 24 | 10.026 | 866 | ||
| 27 | 24 | 9.882 | 854 | ||
| 28 | 24 | 9.908 | 856 | ||
| 29 | 24 | 9.889 | 854 | ||
| 30 | 24 | 9.909 | 856 | December | |
| 31 | 24 | 9.932 | 858 | 24578 | |
| 18369 |
Other Usage-Returns
| Liters | liters | liters | liters | liters | liters | liters | liters | Liters | |||||||||||||||
| Potable | Potable | Service | Service | Service | Service | Potable | Liters | ||||||||||||||||
| produced | return | Feed | Blowdown/Overflow | Evaporation | used | used | return | DW-8 | WQIC Well | ||||||||||||||
| Service Water | Dry Chem | Potable Sample | Cooling Tower | Cooling Tower | Cooling Tower | Irrigation | personnel/process areas | WQIC-C100 | used | used | |||||||||||||
| Jan | 17,981,620 | 14.58 | 959,626 | 0.8 | 620,300 | 0.5 | 735,804 | 0.6 | 677,880 | 0.5 | 57,924 | 0.0 | 43,297 | 0.0 | 352,005 | 0.29 | 12,842 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 19,886,390.0 | 16.1 | 2.19786909905463 |
| Feb | 4,287,548 | 3.48 | 985,144 | 0.8 | 572,434 | 0.5 | 641,179 | 0.5 | 545,586 | 0.4 | 95,593 | 0.1 | 46,162 | 0.0 | 374,715 | 0.30 | 9,424 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 43,186,850.0 | 35.0 | 2.12377173319360 |
| Mar | 8,167,987 | 6.62 | 1,118,867 | 0.9 | 606,273 | 0.5 | 225,586 | 0.2 | 54,710 | 0.0 | 170,876 | 0.1 | 52,256 | 0.0 | 401,210 | 0.33 | 83,422 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.94910993969073 |
| Apr | 7,922,717 | 6.42 | 1,314,203 | 1.1 | 621,876 | 0.5 | 260,030 | 0.2 | 76,652 | 0.1 | 183,377 | 0.1 | 52,975 | 0.0 | 469,340 | 0.38 | 201,955 | 0.16 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.20386168425124 |
| May | 9,129,866 | 7.40 | 1,336,572 | 1.1 | 645,935 | 0.5 | 423,163 | 0.3 | 173,711 | 0.1 | 249,452 | 0.2 | 51,351 | 0.0 | 526,115 | 0.43 | 151,471 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.41846779107922 |
| Jun | 8,107,533 | 6.57 | 1,201,382 | 1.0 | 619,473 | 0.5 | 695,683 | 0.6 | 246,276 | 0.2 | 449,407 | 0.4 | 46,238 | 0.0 | 586,675 | 0.48 | 12,318 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 3,785.0 | 0.0 | 2.55330112217238 |
| Jul | 9,734,052 | 7.89 | 1,199,292 | 1.0 | 635,020 | 0.5 | 1,086,295 | 0.9 | 57,778 | 0.0 | 1,028,517 | 0.8 | 33,225 | 0.0 | 605,600 | 0.49 | 13,002 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 4,803,165.0 | 3.9 | 2.88567826589567 |
| Aug | 18,813,644 | 15.25 | 1,253,466 | 1.0 | 619,678 | 0.5 | 950,414 | 0.8 | 496,885 | 0.4 | 453,528 | 0.4 | 10,061 | 0.0 | 753,215 | 0.61 | 15,279 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.90789286133259 |
| Sep | 10,488,049 | 8.50 | 1,345,566 | 1.1 | 628,429 | 0.5 | 795,229 | 0.6 | 377,326 | 0.3 | 417,903 | 0.3 | 81,222 | 0.1 | 730,505 | 0.59 | 15,279 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 12,399,660.0 | 10.1 | 2.90312407202340 |
| Oct | 11,066,944 | 8.97 | 1,391,533 | 1.1 | 641,616 | 0.5 | 589,703 | 0.5 | 294,270 | 0.2 | 295,433 | 0.2 | 79,027 | 0.1 | 749,430 | 0.61 | 4,035 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.79802175429709 |
| Nov | 10,416,639 | 8.44 | 1,086,585 | 0.9 | 613,227 | 0.5 | 370,173 | 0.3 | 195,284 | 0.2 | 174,889 | 0.1 | 86,847 | 0.1 | 529,900 | 0.43 | 5,863 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.17816893869537 |
| Dec | 7,378,587 | 5.98 | 872,347 | 0.7 | 609,657 | 0.5 | 241861.50 | 0.2 | 101,037 | 0.1 | 140,824 | 0.1 | 89,670 | 0.1 | 386,070 | 0.31 | 7,294 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.0 | 51,547,915.0 | 41.8 | 1.78324955263705 |
| liters | 123,495,186 | 14,064,583 | 7,433,918 | 7,015,119 | 3,297,396 | 3,717,723 | 672,330 | 6,464,780 | 532,184 | 0 | 131,827,765 | ||||||||||||
| acre feet | 100.1 | 11.4 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 0.43 | 0 | 106.9 | ||||||||||||
| Description: | Total amount of service water produced. | Total amount of potable water produced. Subset of service water. | Continuously running sample lines. Flow to plant drain which discharges to MODE. Subset of potable water. | Feed to cooling tower. Subset of service water. | Blowdown/overflow from cooling tower. Flows to plant drain. Subset of cooling tower feed. | Evaporation of cooling water. Difference between feed and blowdown values. Subset of cooling tower feed. | Total amount of water used for irrigation of grounds. Subset of service water. | Potable water supplied to plant facilities. Includes bathrooms, drinking fountains, kitchens and showers. Flows to plant sewers which discharge to septic fields. Subset of potable water. | Potable water supplied to WQIC and Contractor Maintenance Bldg. Flow to plant drain. Subset of potable water. | Total pumped from on-site salinity management well DW-8. | Total pumped from dedicated, on-site test train well. |
Flow Diagram
| MODE | |||||
| Yuma | Feed | Reject | PS1 Clearwell | ||
| Mesa | 818 | 172 | Overflow | ||
| Conduit | AF | AF | 254 | Service Water | |
| AF | Overflow | ||||
| 151 | |||||
| AF |
| 0 | 107 | AF | ||||||||||
| AF | ||||||||||||
| 0 | AF | 5.7 | 6.0 | |||||||||
| AF | AF | |||||||||||
| 11.4 | 5.24 | |||||||||||
| AF | AF | |||||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||||
| AF | River | |||||||||||
| Feed | Returned | Conserved | ||||||||||
| Cooper | 22.236 | 26 | 221 | Irrigation | ||||||||
| Lateral | AF | AF | AF | 1 | Returned | Conserved | ||||||
| AF | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||
| AF | AF |
Colorado River
WQIC
WQIC Well Service Water System
Potable Water System Septic Fields Drainage Well 8 Samples Cooling Tower
WQIC
WQIC Well Service Water System
Potable Water System Septic Fields Drainage Well 8 Samples Cooling Tower
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .