Attachment_Jb6_FILMSS_2__Cover_Letter_and_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80ARC019R0004
About this file
This document contains a presolicitation notice and draft solicitation for the Fully Integrated Lifecycle Mission Support Services 2 (FILMSS 2) federal contract opportunity. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center plans to issue a request for proposal for support services encompassing all phases of mission and project lifecycles for flight programs, research and technology development, and other programs. Key details include a five-year period of performance with a two-year base period and three one-year options. The North American Industry Classification System code is 541715 and small business size standard is 1000 employees. Subcontracting goals are specified for various socioeconomic categories totaling 35% of the overall contract value. The draft solicitation and statement of work will be posted in November 2018 seeking industry comments, with an industry day in December 2018 and comment period closing approximately two weeks later. The final solicitation will be issued in February 2019 and proposals will be due in March 2019.
Jb6 Cover Letter and PPQ
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER (to be completed by the Offeror for its Customers used as references)
INSERT DATE HERE
Dear Client:
We are currently responding to the NASA Ames Research Center request for proposal (RFP) for the Fully Integrated Lifecycle Mission Support Services (FILMSS) procurement. NASA Ames Research Center is continuing to place increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. As such, a requirement of its solicitation is that past clients of ours be identified and participate in the evaluation process. You are hereby authorized to respond to this and other inquiries.
We have identified ______________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge concerning our work.
Please complete the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire and forward it directly to NASA Ames Research Center, ATTN: Jeannette Albiez Code JAC: 241-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001, telephone 650-604-1029. Facsimile responses are acceptable. Please fax to the attention of Jeannette Albiez, fax 650-604-1029. E-mail responses may be sent to: Jeannette.albiez@nasa.gov.
A response to this questionnaire is requested to the above address no later than ___________.
Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to the undersigned.
Sincerely, Enclosure
80ARC019R0004 J.1(b) Attachment 6
This form contains Source Selection Information when completed.
Past Performance Questionnaire
OFFEROR’S HISTORICAL DATA
A. Offeror Identification(to be completed by Offeror)
Offeror:
Contract Number:
Agency/Company:
Contract Title
CONTRACT INFORMATION. Please provide the following information for the contractor and contract number identification in 1.A. above (to be completed by Offeror’s customer):
1. Type of Contract
| Firm Fixed Price |
| ☐ |
| Cost Plus Fixed Fee |
| ☐ |
| Cost Plus Award Fee |
| ☐ |
| Other (Describe): ____________________ |
| ☐ |
2. Method of Competition
| Non-Competitive |
| ☐ |
| Competitive (provide description—e.g., Full and Open, Small Business Set-Aside, etc.) _____________________________________________________ |
| ☐ |
| Follow-on? |
| ☐ |
| New requirement? |
| ☐ |
3. Period of Performance (including extensions/options):
From:
To:
4. Contract Value (including all options at award): $________________________________ Contract Value (including options/ modifications at completion): $ ______________________
5. If this is (was) an award fee contract, please provide award fee percentages and adjectival ratings earned for the life of the contract by period.
| PERIOD |
| PERCENTAGE |
| RATING |
| PERIOD |
| PERCENTAGE |
| RATING |
1.
6.
2.
7.
3.
8.
4.
9.
5.
10.
6. Was the contractor the prime contractor or a subcontractor? Indicate the percentage of overall contract work performed by the offeror as prime/ or as a subcontractor and number of Work Year Equivalents (WYEs) used to perform the work.
| Prime contractor |
| ☐ |
| Subcontractor |
| ☐ |
% of work performed
# of WYEs provided
7. Description of services provided:
Use the following adjectival ratings to respond to the questions on the following pages. Please select one rating per statement, using the following definitions and provide additional remarks to further explain any Excellent, Very Good and Poor rating, as well as in response to the more detailed questions.
B. RATINGS AND QUESTIONS
A. RATINGS. Please review this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
1. Please return the completed questionnaire within five working days of receipt. A telephone interview may be conducted to obtain your responses or for clarification purposes.
2. You are urged to read the questionnaire and provide your own knowledge of the offeror’s performance with the judgment of others (e.g., coordinated effort between the Contracting Officer and the Technical Point of Contact) in your program. In addition to providing the information for the contract or order identified, we solicit your comments on other similar contract or order that your activity has with this offeror.
3. For each item requesting a rating, respond with the rating that best describes the contractor’s performance for the referenced contract or order. If an item is not applicable to your contract order, or if you do not know how the contractor performed/is performing on that item, please respond N/A. The rating scale is defined as:
Definition of Ratings
| Excellent (E) |
| Consistent record of exceptional past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work identical or very similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract; indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Consistent record of successful past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work identical or very similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract; demonstrating very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Good (G) |
| Successful past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract; and it demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Neutral (N) |
| Neutral score. Assigned to offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or not applicable. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Successful past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract and may be limited in terms of the size, scope and complexity when compared to this contract; demonstrates meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Poor (P) |
| The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates performance that does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas, which adversely affect overall performance. |
Provide additional remarks to further explain any Excellent, Very Good or Poor ratings.
| Place an “X” in the appropriate column |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Relevant Technical Performance |
| Experience with space life sciences and space flight hardware |
Partnership experience with academia, industry and other government agencies.
Experience with Science Technology Engineering and Math (STEM) Education and Public Outreach (EPO)
Experience with global virtual communications
Compliance with contractual requirements including technical and schedule requirements, and experience with tailoring these processes for innovative missions
Contractor flexibility and effectiveness in dealing with changes to technical requirements
Innovation and resource-efficient solutions to satisfy requirements
Approach to dealing with short-term, high demand requirements
Please provide details on any Excellent, Very Good or Poor ratings from the table above:
Please describe the complexity of the technical requirements of this contract: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Please describe the extent that life sciences and space flight were requirements of this contract: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments/Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provide additional remarks to further explain any Excellent, Very Good or Poor ratings.
| Place an “X” in the appropriate column |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Contract Management |
| Ability to manage both small and large tasks as well as the simultaneous management of a large number of varied tasks |
Ability to attract and retain high-caliber Key personnel and technical employees to address contract objectives
Qualifications, effectiveness, and authority of on-site contract management
Proactiveness and cooperativeness in resolving issues
Past Performance of Subcontract management, including meeting subcontract goals
Conformance with the terms and conditions of contracts, including delivery of products and reports, and adherence to cost and schedule constraints
Efficiency and effectiveness of approach used to attract and retain employees
Effectiveness of any Corporate Management Involvement in the operation of the contract.
Management of the phase-in period to ensure efficient continuation of operations during contract turn-over, retention rates for technical personnel, technical milestones met or slipped, any other pertinent issues
Employee safety record
Comments/Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
III. OTHER INFORMATION
1. Describe any serious performance problems, termination for default, and any regulatory or safety violations resulting from contractor performance.
2. Explain any schedule slips and steps taken to mitigate the impact of the slips.
3. Discuss any major problems encountered and the contractor’s resolutions to those problems.
4. Examples of innovative methods implemented by the contractor that resulted in cost savings to the customer.
5. Discuss any overruns in direct or indirect overhead rates and their impact on overall performance
6. Management of Phase-In period for all contracts including factors such as efficient continuation of operations during contract turn-over, technical milestones met or slipped, any other pertinent issues. Please include whether or not contractor was the incumbent.
7. Discuss any schedule slips and steps taken to mitigate the impact of the slips.
8. List any U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) or Agency Inspector General (IG) audit reports and those decisions and/or findings, within the last three (3) years.
IV. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name (Print): ___________________________________
Telephone: _______________________________
Contracting Agency or Company: ________________________
Position/Title: ________________________________
Relationship to Contract: ________________________
Length of Involvement in Contract: ____________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .