52.212-2 Evaluation Factors for Award.pdf
PDF 81 KB Posted
- Attached to
- KLAXON Data Cable
- Solicitation number
- FA4600_KlaxonDataCable
About this file
This document is the 52.212-2 Evaluation Factors for Award clause from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). It outlines the evaluation criteria that will be used to award a contract resulting from this solicitation.
The key evaluation factors are: (1) Price - the total evaluated price of all contract line items will be ranked, and price reasonableness will be determined using FAR 13.106 procedures; and (2) Technical Capability - offers will be rated as technically acceptable or unacceptable based on meeting the requirements in the Statement of Need. The Government will award the contract to the responsible offeror whose offer is most advantageous, considering price and technical factors.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation - FA460024Q0029.pdf | ||
| 52.212-1 Instruction to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Statement of Need - Klaxon Data Cable.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Nov 2021
Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
(1) Price: The quotations will be ranked according to their total evaluated price (TEP) as identified by contract line-item total pricing. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all CLINs for the required period of performance.
The offeror's price quotation will be evaluated using one or more of the procedures and techniques defined in FAR 13.106-2 and FAR 13.106-3 in order to determine price reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through competitive quotations as described in FAR 13.106-3.
(2) Technical Capability: Offerors will be considered technically acceptable or unacceptable per the Statement of Need. Acceptable ratings will only be given to offerors that meet the requirements outlined in the Statement of Need.
Quotes will be evaluated to be technically acceptable or not technically acceptable based on the evaluation factors listed above.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .