52.212-2 Eval Criteria_REV2.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Crane Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911N224R0015-0006
About this file
This document is an evaluation criteria addendum to FAR 52.212-2 for a Department of the Army crane maintenance contract. The evaluation will use a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach with awards made without discussions unless deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer.
Technical evaluation includes three subfactors: 1) Capability Statement demonstrating ability to perform OSHA inspections and maintenance on mobile cranes, 2) Qualifications showing technicians are trained, licensed, and certified with OEM credentials, and 3) Experience requiring minimum 5 years performing similar work. Past Performance evaluation requires five relevant projects from the past two years. Pricing evaluation will consider all option years, with offerors required to complete Schedule B pricing for all CLINs. Proposals must be rated Technically Acceptable in all factors to be considered, with technical evaluation conducted independently of price review. Past Performance will only be evaluated for technically acceptable proposals.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOL AMENDMENT W911N224R00150006.pdf | ||
| SOLICITATION W911N224R0015 - CONFORMED COPY.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors, in the below Addendum, shall be used to evaluate offers.
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(d) All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the solicitation requirements, including the areas of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment, past performance, and technical acceptability, with the exception of price realism, due to the fact that this is no longer included in the solicitation.
(End of Provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, BASIS OF AWARD:
A. General Information:
1. The basis of award will be the Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable offer. Offerors must receive a rating of Technically Acceptable in all factors/subfactors in order for their overall proposal to be determined Technically Acceptable.
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and technical requirements.
3. The Government intends to make award without discussions, unless the Contracting Officer determines that discussions are necessary. Offerors should provide their most favorable prices in their initial offers.
B. Non-Price Evaluation Factors and Subfactors:
1. Factor 1- Technical:
(a) Subfactor 1 Capability Statement: The offeror shall provide information of their ability to perform annual OSHA inspection, frequent monthly OSHA inspections, annual preventative maintenance and repair service to the mobile cranes listed in this requirement. This shall include information on personnel and knowledge to perform the services.
(b) Subfactor 2 Qualifications: The offeror shall demonstrate that their technicians and/or sub-contractors performing maintenance on the listed equipment are fully trained, licensed, certified and qualified to perform the duties in this performance work statement. Offerors shall provide verification that they have received training approved by the manufacturers for the specific cranes listed in the Performance Work Statement. The offerors shall provide a copy of their OEM licenses and certifications.
(c) Subfactor 3 Experience: The offeror shall demonstrate that their technicians shall have a minimum of five (5) years’ experience performing the requirements in this Performance Work Statement.
2. Factor 2- Past Performance: The offeror shall provide five (5) recent and relevant Government or private sector projects completed within the past two (2) years that demonstrates the ability to perform the duties in this performance work statement. The Offeror shall identify the Contract number, Period of Performance, Entity in which the contract was held, total dollar amount, and a POC information.
C. Price Evaluation Factor: Offerors shall complete the Schedule B with pricing for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including all option years. The Government may require continued performance under FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. The Government will evaluate the basic and all option year prices on the basis that the rates will not change if the Government opts to utilize its option per FAR clause 52.217-8 at the end of the basic or any option year during the performance of the contract. Evaluation of the option year pricing in this manner shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options.
D. Proposals will be evaluated initially independently of the price to determine the Offerors’ ability to meet the Government’s requirement set forth in the solicitation. The Government may make a final rating determination based on the proposal as submitted without requesting any further information. For all proposals determined to be Technically Acceptable, the offer providing the lowest price will receive the contract award.
1. Offerors’ technical proposals will receive an overall rating based on the following:
(a) Technically Acceptable: Offeror meets all requirements or technical specifications or has submitted all documentation requested in any technical evaluation criteria and all documentation meets the standard set forth in the solicitation.
(b) Technically Unacceptable: Offeror fails to meet all requirements or technical specifications or has failed to comply in submitting requested documentation in any technical evaluation criteria or the submitted documentation fails to meet the standard set forth in the solicitation.
2. Evaluation of past performance will be performed only on proposals that receive a technically acceptable rating on technical evaluation factors. Offerors past performance information will receive an overall rating based on the following:
(A) Acceptable: Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. An Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability or unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”
(b) Unacceptable: Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .